Inhibition of YAP ameliorates choroidal neovascularization via inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation

Abstract

Purpose

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of central visual loss among patients over the age of 55 years worldwide. Neovascular-type AMD (nAMD) accounts for approximately 10% of patients with AMD and is characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The proliferation of choroidal endothelial cells (CECs) is one important step in the formation of new vessels. Transcriptional coactivator Yes-associated protein (YAP) can promote the proliferation of multiple cancer cells, corneal endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, which participate in angiogenesis. This study intends to reveal the expression and functions of YAP during the CNV process.

Methods

In the study, a mouse CNV model was generated by laser photocoagulation. YAP expression was detected with western blotting and immunohistochemistry. YAP siRNA and ranibizumab, a VEGF monoclonal antibody, were injected intravitreally in CNV mice. The YAP and VEGF expression levels after injection were detected with western blotting. The incidence and leakage area of CNV were measured with fundus fluorescein angiography, choroidal flat mounting, and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Immunofluorescent double staining was used to detect YAP cellular localization with CD31 (an endothelial cell marker) antibody. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in CNV mice without or with YAP siRNA intravitreal injection and the colocalization of PCNA and CD31 were measured with western blotting and immunofluorescent double staining, respectively.

Results

YAP expression increased following laser exposure, in accordance with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. YAP siRNA and ranibizumab decreased VEGF expression and the incidence and leakage area of CNV. YAP was localized in the vascular endothelium within the CNV site. Additionally, after laser exposure, YAP siRNA inhibited the increased expression of PCNA, which was colocalized with endothelial cells.

Conclusions

This study showed that YAP upregulation promoted CNV formation by upregulating the proliferation of endothelial cells, providing evidence for the molecular mechanisms of CNV and suggesting a novel molecular target for nAMD treatment.

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of central visual loss among patients beyond the age of 55 years worldwide. The neovascular (exudative or wet) type (nAMD) accounts for approximately 10% of patients with AMD. nAMD is characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV), which is the formation of a choroidal neovascular membrane fibrovascular complex that emanates from the choriocapillaris through a defective Bruch’s membrane. The pathogenesis of CNV is not fully understood, but vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) have been found to play important roles in its development [1]. Among them, VEGF-A can promote the division and proliferation of vascular endothelial cells and neovascularization and maintain the survival of new vessels. Furthermore, VEGF-A is an inflammatory cell chemotactic factor [2,3]. It also increases vascular permeability [4]. High VEGF-A expression can be detected in surgically isolated samples of newly formed vessel membranes associated with nAMD [5]. VEGF inhibition has become a widely accepted treatment for exudative AMD.

Ranibizumab (RBZ, trade name Lucentis) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody. Its receptor binding site is VEGF-A, which is known to promote vascular generation and leakage and to cause nAMD. The binding of RBZ prevents the interaction of vascular receptors (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2) on the surfaces of vascular endothelial cells, inhibits vascular endothelial hyperplasia, and reduces vascular leakage into the macular region and the development of CNV [6]. In 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of intravitreal RBZ injections for the treatment of nAMD. The State Food and Drug Authority of China approved the clinical use in December 2011. However, RBZ can cause ocular adverse effects (AEs), including conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, vitreous floaters, and increased intraocular pressure [7]. Reported serious ocular AEs include endophthalmitis, uveitis, retinal detachment, retinal tear, retinal hemorrhage, and vitreous hemorrhage [8]. Therefore, the identification of new molecular targets of nAMD treatment is extremely urgent.

The proliferation of choroidal endothelial cells (CECs) is one important step in the formation of new vessels [9]. Angiogenic cytokines and growth factors secreted through an autocrine loop by CECs, or by a paracrine loop through the RPE, inflammatory cells, or fibroblasts, modulate the development of CNV [10]. Therefore, the molecules that regulate endothelial cell proliferation during CNV are of interest to researchers.

Yes-associated protein (YAP) or its paralog transcriptional coactivator with a PDZ-binding motif (TAZ; also named WWTR1) is a transcription coactivator in the Hippo pathway [11] and has vital roles in regulating the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of cells, tissue growth, and organ morphogenesis [12]. The Hippo pathway has been established in Drosophila melanogaster as an important regulator of organ size, and this pathway is highly conserved in mammals [13,14]. Studies have demonstrated that the fundamental roles of the Hippo signaling pathway include organ size control, regeneration, stem cell self-renewal, and tumorigenesis [15-17]. Neurofibromin 2 (NF2) knockout mice develop cataracts due to the disorganization and accumulation of cells in the lens epithelium as a result of abnormal tissue growth, which can be reversed by deleting YAP, indicating that this phenotype is dependent on the Hippo pathway [18]. This phenotype aligns with the current understanding of elevated YAP activity resulting in overgrowth, especially in tumors such as ovarian cancer [19], colorectal cancer [20], non-small cell lung cancer [21], and prostate cancer [22]. Interestingly, recent studies showed that YAP/TAZ mediates a wide range of cellular signals, including cell–cell contact, cell polarity, mechanical cues, secreted mitogens, and cellular metabolic status [23], which are all required for the regulation of angiogenesis. In addition, the crucial roles of YAP/TAZ have been uncovered in the morphogenesis, polarization, and migration of tip endothelial cells (ECs) and in the proliferation of stalk ECs in the developing vasculature with respect to the regulation of actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, cell cycle progression, and metabolism [24]. However, the expression and functions of YAP in CNV remain unclear.

Based on previous research, we speculated whether YAP regulated CNV formation by modulating the proliferation of CECs. A mouse CNV model was created by laser exposure, and YAP siRNA intravitreal injection was applied while RBZ was regarded as a positive control. This study further illustrates the cellular and molecular mechanisms of CNV formation and suggests novel molecular targets for AMD treatment.

Methods

Mouse laser-induced CNV

All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Animal Welfare committee of Nantong University. The research protocol for the use of animals was approved by the Center of Laboratory Animals, Nantong University (Nantong, Jiangsu, China) and the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Visual Research.

Adult C57BL/6J (B6) mice (Experimental Animal Center of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with 0.5% pentobarbital (0.1 ml per 10 g weight), and the pupils were dilated with topical administration of tropic amide phenylephrine eye drops (Santen, Osaka, Japan). Laser photocoagulation (647.1 nm; 50 mm spot size; 0.05 s duration; 250 mW) with a hand-held contact fundus lens (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, WA) was performed to burn the retina at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock positions. The time at which a bubble was observed, indicating rupture of Bruch’s membrane, was recorded. All mice were randomly divided into five groups based on the time after laser treatment (normal, 1, 3, 7, and 14 days). For western blot analysis, each group contained 24 mice that received laser treatment, and 15 mice that did not receive laser treatment constituted the control group. In the control and 7 day post-laser groups, another 45 mice (90 eyeballs) were included for choroidal flat mount, immunofluorescence, and histopathology.

Western blotting

RPE-choroid-sclera complexes and retinas were extracted from three mice at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after laser injury. Proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membrane was then incubated with rabbit anti-YAP (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), mouse anti-VEGF (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and mouse anti-PCNA (1:1,000; Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The antibodies were incubated with 5% skim milk overnight at 4 °C and reacted with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2,000; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) at 37 °C for 2 h. Extensive washes in 0.05% Tween-20 in TBS were followed by incubation with anti-GAPDH (1:1,000; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO). The blots were then incubated with chemifluorescent reagent enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Thermo Scientific) and exposed to X-ray film in the dark. The intensity of the GAPDH signal was used as an endogenous control, and band optical density was quantified using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Immunohistochemistry

Eight eyes were enucleated in each group, and 8 μm cryosections were prepared for immunohistochemistry staining 7 days after laser photocoagulation. Slides were briefly washed in PBS (136 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 8 mM Na₂PO₄, 2 mM KH₂PO₄, pH 7.4) pH 7.4) and blocked with 3% normal bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. The sections were incubated sequentially with rabbit anti-YAP (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), with three PBS washes in between. Immunoreactivity was visualized with the peroxidase substrate amino ethyl carbazole (AEC kit; Hao Yang Biologic, TianJin, China). Images of the tissue samples were acquired with a microscope equipped with epifluorescence (Eclipse E800; Nikon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) through a digital camera (DS-Fi1c; Nikon).

Intravitreal injection

YAP siRNA (2.5 nmol; Biomics Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Nantong, China) dissolved in 1 μl of PBS (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 μg of RBZ, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) were injected into the vitreous cavity with a 33-gauge, double-caliber needle (Ito Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) immediately after the laser injury. Mice with or without laser injury were killed on day 7. The normal control group represented no laser injury or intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR). The 7 day group represented laser-induced CNV without any injection.

Fundus fluorescein angiography

To confirm the inhibitory effect of YAP siRNA on CNV formation, fluorescein angiography was performed 7 days after laser photocoagulation. The development of CNV was evaluated using a digital fundus camera connected to a slit-lamp delivery system (Heidelberg, Beijing, China), and images were captured 3 min after 0.3 ml of 2% fluorescein sodium (Alcon Laboratories, Irvine, CA) was injected into the intraperitoneal cavity of mice as previously described [25].

Choroidal flat mount

Seven days after laser coagulation, 30 eyes (six eyes from three mice/each group) were subjected to choroidal flat mount. The eyes were enucleated and immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Guoyao Group of Chemical Reagents, Beijing, China) in PBS (pH 7.3) for 1 h. Under a biopsy microscope, the anterior segments were wiped out, and the neurosensory retinas were detached and separated from the optic nerve head. The remaining eyecups were washed with cold immunochemistry (ICC) buffer (0.5% BSA, 0.2% Tween-20, and 0.1% Triton X-100) in PBS. A 1 mg/ml solution of Alexa Fluor 568 conjugated isolectin-B4 (1:100; Invitrogen-Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was prepared in ICC buffer. The eyecups were incubated with the fluorescent dyes above in a humidified chamber at 4 °C with gentle shaking for 4 h, followed by washing with cold ICC buffer. Four or five radial cuts were made toward the optic nerve head for flat mounting of the sclera/choroid/RPE complexes with the gel (Gel-mount; Biomedia Corp. Foster City, CA). The samples were covered and sealed for microscopic analysis.

CNV volume quantification

Z-stack images of CNV retinal flatmounts stained with isolectin B4 were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope with a 10X objective lens. The image stacks were rendered in three dimensions using IMARIS imaging software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland) and processed to digitally extract the fluorescent lesion volume.

Histopathology

Eight eyes were enucleated in each group, and 8 μm cryosections were prepared for hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining 7 days after laser photocoagulation. The sections were coverslipped with mounting medium. Serial sections were examined, and the samples that contained the thickest or widest lesions among the set of specimens obtained for each CNV condition were assessed. Slices with HE staining were examined using a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). IPP 6.0 was used to calculate the maximum thickness and length of each CNV lesion.

Immunofluorescence

YAP tissue localization was examined on 8 μm cryosections (7 days after laser photocoagulation). The cryosections were blocked with 1% BSA for 4 h at room temperature and then incubated with rabbit YAP antibody (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and mouse CD31 antibody (1:50, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at 4 °C overnight. For CD31 staining, antigen retrieval was achieved using a heated water bath at 97 °C for 10 min. Then, the slides were stained with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG), Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and Hoechst 33258 (1:2000; Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 861405). Photomicrographs were taken using a digital high-sensitivity camera (Hamamatsu, ORCA-ER C4742–95, Hamamatsu, Japan).

Statistical analysis

All values are presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD). A one-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons of multiple groups. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Stata statistical software version 11.0. A p value of less than 0.5 was considered statistically significant. Each experiment was performed at least three times.

Results

YAP and VEGF expression increases after laser photocoagulation

To identify the expression levels of YAP and VEGF in CNV, proteins of RPE-choroid complexes and retinas were extracted for western blotting. After laser injury, YAP expression was upregulated and peaked at 7 days, showing a similar tendency to that of VEGF (Figure 1A,B). Immunohistochemistry also showed that YAP expression increased following laser exposure (Figure 1C). These results suggest that YAP may be associated with CNV formation.

Figure 1.

YAP and VEGF expression levels are upregulated after CNV formation. The mouse choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model was generated by laser photocoagulation. A: YAP and VEGF protein levels were detected with western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B: The histogram shows the densitometric analysis of the average levels of YAP and VEGF relative to GAPDH. *p<0.05; compared to normal controls. C: Immunohistochemistry of YAP in the normal and 7 day post-laser photocoagulation groups.

YAP siRNA alleviates the leakage and extent of CNV

To further investigate the functions of YAP in CNV, intraperitoneal (IP) injection of YAP siRNA was applied in the mouse CNV model, and ZBR was used as a positive control. Three types of YAP siRNA (mm-Yap-si-1, -2, and -3, shown in Table 1) and scramble siRNA were used for IP injection, with mm-Yap-si-2 showing the highest knockdown efficiency, which was used in the subsequent experiments (data not shown). Then, the YAP and VEGF expression levels following the YAP siRNA IP injection and laser injury were measured, showing that the YAP protein levels in the RPE-choroid complexes and the retina were reduced dramatically in the YAP siRNA and RBZ groups compared with those in the control, vehicle, and scramble siRNA groups. Furthermore, VEGF expression showed a decrease similar to that of YAP (Figure 2A,B), suggesting that YAP may promote CNV formation by upregulating VEGF expression.

Table 1. The siRNAs used in the study.

SiRNA name	Sequence (5′-3′)	position
Scramble siRNA	Sense: UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT	None
	Anti-sense: ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT
mm-Yap-si-1	Sense: GGAGAAGUUUACUACAUAAdTdT	891
	Anti-sense: UUAUGUAGUAAACUUCUCCdTdT
mm-Yap-si-2	Sense: CAAGACAUCUUCUGGUCAAdTdT	701
	Anti-sense: UUGACCAGAAGAUGUCUUGdTdT
mm-Yap-si-3	Sense: GAAUUGAGAACAAUGACAAdTdT	1278
	Anti-sense: UUGUCAUUGUUCUCAAUUCdTdT

Figure 2.

YAP siRNA IP injection reduces VEGF expression and the leakage area of CNV. A: YAP and VEGF protein levels after scramble siRNA and YAP siRNA intraperitoneal (IP) injection and intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) were detected with western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B: The histogram shows the densitometric analysis of the average levels of YAP and VEGF relative to GAPDH. *p<0.05; compared to the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation group. C: Hyper-fluorescence surrounding the laser spots reflects relatively weak leakage (grade 1) in the YAP siRNA IP injected mouse retinas. D: Mouse RPE-choroid flat mount preparations from laser-injured regions were fluorescently labeled with the endothelial and microglial cell marker isolectin-B4 (63X magnification). Scale bars = 100 μm. E: Comparison of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) size in the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation, vehicle, scramble siRNA, YAP siRNA, and RBZ groups. *p<0.05, compared to the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation group.

The fluorescein angiogram assays showed that the leakage area of CNV decreased in the YAP siRNA and RBZ groups 7 days after laser exposure (Figure 2C). A well-defined radial array of isolectin-labeled vessels was visible within the CNV area in the 7 day, vehicle, and scramble siRNA groups (Figure 2D). Compared to the 7 day, vehicle, and scramble siRNA groups, the extent of CNV was smaller in the YAP siRNA and RBZ groups (Figure 2E).

YAP is localized in the vascular endothelium within the CNV site

Seven days after laser exposure, histopathology analysis showed that YAP siRNA IP injection and IVR statistically significantly decreased the thickness and length of the retinal lesions caused by CNV (Figure 3A,B). To identify the cellular localization of YAP within the CNV site, double immunostaining of YAP with CD31, a marker for endothelial cells, was performed. Within the CNV site, YAP was localized in the vascular endothelium (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

YAP is localized in endothelial cells. A: Normal mouse retinal and choroid structure. Each photograph shows the central area of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) within the mouse retinas and choroids in the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation, vehicle, scramble siRNA, YAP siRNA, or ranibizumab (RBZ) group. Scale bar: 100 μm (RPE: retinal pigment epithelium; OS: outer segment; IS: inner segment; ONL: outer nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; GC: ganglion cell layer). B: Statistical analysis of the data of the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation, vehicle, scramble siRNA, YAP siRNA, and RBZ groups. n = 12–16 spots. *p<0.05, compared to the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation group. Black dashed lines represent the edge of CNV. C: Cellular localization of YAP in the retina/choroid cryosections was determined with double immunostaining with endothelial marker CD31. Scale bar = 100 μm.

YAP siRNA inhibits the proliferation of endothelial cells

Previous studies have revealed that YAP promotes the proliferation of corneal endothelial cells [26] and vascular smooth muscle cells [27]. Therefore, PCNA expression was detected in the mouse CNV model, showing that the PCNA protein level increased following laser exposure, which peaked at 7 days (Figure 4A,B). After YAP siRNA IP injection, PCNA expression decreased compared to that in the 7 day group (Figure 4C,D), which was consistent with the immunofluorescence results (Figure 4E). Taken together, these data indicate that YAP siRNA facilitates CNV by inhibiting the proliferation of endothelial cells.

Figure 4.

YAP siRNA inhibits the proliferation of endothelial cells. A: The PCNA protein level was detected with western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B: The Bar Chart showed the ratio of PCNA to GAPDH. *p<0.05, compared to the normal control group. C: The PCNA protein level following scramble siRNA or YAP siRNA intravitreal (IP) injection was detected with western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. D: The Bar Chart showed the ratio of PCNA to GAPDH. *p<0.05, compared to the 7 day post-laser photocoagulation group. E: Double immunostaining of PCNA and CD31 in the normal control, 7 day post-laser photocoagulation, and YAP siRNA groups. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Discussion

The mouse laser-induced CNV model is widely used in nAMD research. Developed originally for primates [28], this model was later adapted for rodents [29]. These animal models are highly applicable to CNV that occasionally occurs in human eyes after accidental laser burns [30]. Laser-induced CNV models provide preclinical evidence to support the clinical evaluation of anti-VEGF drugs for ocular neovascular diseases such as AMD and diabetic retinopathy [31]. In this study, the mouse laser-induced CNV model was generated and revealed that the VEGF protein level peaked at 7 days, which is consistent with previous research [32-34]. Polyethylene glycol-8 (PEG-8) subretinal injection can also induce CNV based on the principles of intraocular complement activation in mice, with VEGF peaking 5 days after PEG-8 exposure [35]. A JR5558 mouse with an rd8 mutation on a C57BL/6J background is an established model of spontaneous CNV, with spontaneous CNV starting between postnatal days 10 and 15 and increasing in extent and severity, subsequently causing RPE disruption and dysfunction [36,37]. Considering the cost and the lack of relationship between CNV and gene mutation, we did not use mutated mice.

The process of CNV formation involves multiple angiogenic factors, including VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factors, tumor necrosis factor, pigment epithelium-derived growth factor, interleukins, the complement system, chemokines, ephrins, and angiopoietins [38]. Among them, VEGF plays a central role in CNV. Therefore, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents are the mainstay of nAMD treatment worldwide. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, including ranibizumab, does not cure the disease, but it decreases the rate of progression and facilitates visual improvements in some patients [39]. In this study, ranibizumab also inhibited VEGF expression and promoted CNV formation.

YAP promotes tissue growth and cell viability by regulating the activity of multiple transcription factors, including TEA domain family (TEADs) and Sma- and Mad-related family (SMADs) members [16,40]. YAP/TEAD activates CD44 transcription by binding to the CD44 promoter at TEAD binding sites. However, CD44 regulates NF2 (an upstream molecule of YAP) phosphorylation according to cell density and sequentially promotes the YAP transcriptional coactivator, suggesting that CD44 has two pivotal functional roles as an upstream suppressor of the Hippo pathway and as a downstream target regulated by YAP/TEAD [41]. CD44 is a cell–surface adhesion molecule and a receptor for hyaluronan (HA), a major component of the extracellular matrix, which is involved in cell adhesion [42], proliferation [43], inflammation [44,45], tumor invasion, and metastasis [46]. In addition to the proliferation of endothelial cells, inflammation is another pathogenic factor in CNV [47-49]. CD44 is maximally induced at 3–5 days post-laser photocoagulation in rats and is localized to the RPE, choroidal vascular endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells, suggesting that CD44 expression before new vessel formation may be linked to the initiation of CNV [50,51]. Moreover, antibody-based blockade of CD44 significantly reduced CNV [51]. Whether YAP promotes the proliferation and inflammatory response of endothelial cells via CD44 will be addressed in a future study.

A recent study revealed that transglutaminase 2 (TG2; Gene ID 7052; OMIM 190196) is a direct target gene of the YAP/TAZ response, which is supported by YAP1 and TAZ interactions with the TG2 promoter to regulate TG2 mRNA and protein levels in MCF10A, HaCaT, and HCT116 cells [52]. TG2, also known as tissue transglutaminase, has multiple functions in protein cross-linking and protein kinases [53] and serves as a scaffolding factor [54]. TG2 activity has been implicated in various physiologic activities, including apoptosis [55], angiogenesis [56], wound healing [57], and cellular differentiation [58]. TG2 in ECs acts as a multifunctional protein during angiogenesis by regulating the deposition of VEGF into the extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitating the activation of its signaling through VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2). Based on previous research, the hypothesis that YAP may regulate CNV through TG2 functions warrants further study.

The Hippo signaling cascade is regulated by various upstream factors, including cell–cell contact, organ size sensing machinery, and other signaling pathways regulated by WNT, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), especially Gα12/13-linked GPCRs [59]. Moreover, a recent study [60] showed that YAP is essential for tissue morphogenesis mediated through a Rho GTPase-activating protein, ARHGAP18, in the regulation of the cortical actomyosin network and filopodia formation in medaka and zebrafish. TGF-β is a molecule with pleiotropic effects that participates in cell proliferation and differentiation during angiogenesis and fibrotic processes, and the presence of TGF-β in neovascular membranes has been demonstrated [61,62]. TGF-β families are expressed in CNV [63]. Several studies have found that TGF-β significantly enhances VEGF secretion, vascular permeability, and extracellular matrix remodeling on its own or in concert with other cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) [64,65]. Therefore, we proposed that YAP expression may be upregulated by TGF-β during CNV formation, which requires further investigation.

In summary, this study demonstrated that the upregulation of YAP promoted CNV formation by upregulating the proliferation of endothelial cells. Treatment with YAP siRNA significantly decreased the extent of laser-induced CNV in a mouse model, suggesting that YAP may be an important molecular target for antiangiogenesis therapies in AMD. There are limitations in this study that should be mentioned. First, the detailed mechanism of YAP in promoting endothelial cell proliferation has not been investigated. Second, whether YAP promotes CNV formation through other pathways, such as regulation of the inflammatory response, remains uncertain.