Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
letter
. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):936. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0410LE

A Word of Caution Regarding Patient Self-inflicted Lung Injury and Prophylactic Intubation

Bhakti K Patel 1, Krysta S Wolfe 1, Jesse B Hall 1, John P Kress 1
PMCID: PMC5803660  PMID: 28460177

To the Editor:

We read the Critical Care Perspective “Mechanical Ventilation to Minimize Progression of Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Failure” by Brochard and colleagues with great interest (1). The concept of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is an intriguing idea. However, there are several important points worth considering when addressing this concept.

First, intubation, with sedation and neuromuscular blockade, is not without risk, particularly with regard to harm apart from lung injury. For example, neurocognitive and neuromuscular dysfunction are ubiquitous in intubated, mechanically ventilated intensive care unit survivors. Accordingly, even if P-SILI does occur, the cost of intubation, with sedation and paralysis, may be greater than maintaining spontaneous breathing without intubation. The intriguing early data regarding benefits on neuromuscular blockade as a strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome management are currently under investigation in a large multicenter trial sponsored by the PETAL (Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury) Network.

The avoidance of intubation using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen, helmet noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and face mask NIPPV have recently been demonstrated to improve outcomes in those with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (24). Although higher tidal volumes during NIPPV predict the need for intubation (5), it is not clear whether this is cause/effect or merely an epiphenomenon.

Although there is evidence describing the potential harm associated with spontaneous breathing, there is also conflicting evidence suggesting that spontaneous breathing with varying tidal volumes is associated with a reduction in lung injury compared with monotonous controlled mechanical ventilation (6). Indeed, the benefits of a varying respiratory volume and cadence (“noisy,” natural breathing) have been known for decades (7).

Although the ideas presented by Brochard and colleagues regarding mechanical ventilation to minimize lung injury are intriguing, we believe it is premature to recommended prophylactic intubation to prevent P-SILI.

Footnotes

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0410LE on May 1, 2017

Author disclosures are available with the text of this letter at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Brochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical ventilation to minimize progression of lung injury in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:438–442. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, et al. FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2185–2196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2435–2441. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jaber S, Lescot T, Futier E, Paugam-Burtz C, Seguin P, Ferrandiere M, Lasocki S, Mimoz O, Hengy B, Sannini A, et al. NIVAS Study Group. Effect of noninvasive ventilation on tracheal reintubation among patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure following abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1345–1353. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carteaux G, Millán-Guilarte T, De Prost N, Razazi K, Abid S, Thille AW, Schortgen F, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Failure of noninvasive ventilation for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: role of tidal volume. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:282–290. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spieth PM, Carvalho AR, Pelosi P, Hoehn C, Meissner C, Kasper M, Hübler M, von Neindorff M, Dassow C, Barrenschee M, et al. Variable tidal volumes improve lung protective ventilation strategies in experimental lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:684–693. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200806-975OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Suki B, Alencar AM, Sujeer MK, Lutchen KR, Collins JJ, Andrade JS, Jr, Ingenito EP, Zapperi S, Stanley HE. Life-support system benefits from noise. Nature. 1998;393:127–128. doi: 10.1038/30130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES