Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;5(1):ENEURO.0298-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0298-17.2017

Table 4.

[DA]ECvalues (mean ± SEM) under different conditions

Space DAT distribution [DA]EC ± Δ [DA]EC (nM)
Tonic Phasic
Well-mixed DA a 8.16 ± 0.92 8.29 ± 1.41
Ellipsoid geometry 8.21 ± 0.85 8.33 ± 1.44
Complex space
    Case 1 Uniform b 7.54 ± 0.86 6.93 ± 1.92
    Case 2 Nonuniform c 16.59 ± 1.26 14.19 ± 2.44
    Case 3 Sharp bimodal d 33.12 ± 3.13 29.65 ± 4.49
    Case 4 Sharp bimodal d 32.49 ± 2.86 32.89 ± 3.68
a

Space/structure-independent. All other cases are in realistic DA neuronal geometry.

b

DAT densities for uniform and nonuniform (bimodal) distributions; see Table 2.

c

Case 2 (ρh = 6339/μm2 and ρl = 50/μm2).

d

Cases 3 and 4 (ρh = 30,000/μm2 and ρl = 50/μm2; see Figs. 2 and 11).