Skip to main content
Current Zoology logoLink to Current Zoology
. 2016 May 9;63(2):165–173. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow054

On the identification of paedomorphic and overwintering larval newts based on cloacal shape: review and guidelines

Mathieu Denoël 1,*
PMCID: PMC5804162  PMID: 29491974

Abstract

Paedomorphosis is an alternative process to metamorphosis in which adults retain larval traits at the adult stage. It is frequent in newts and salamanders, where larvae reach sexual maturity without losing their gills. However, in some populations, larvae overwinter in water, while remaining immature. These alternative ontogenetic processes are of particular interest in various research fields, but have different causes and consequences, as only paedomorphosis allows metamorphosis to be bypassed before maturity. It is thus relevant to efficiently identify paedomorphs versus overwintering larvae. In this context, the aim of this article was 3-fold: firstly, to perform a meta-analysis of the identification procedures carried out in the literature; secondly, to determine the effectiveness of body size to make inferences about adulthood by surveying natural newt populations of Lissotriton helveticus and Ichthyosaura alpestris, and thirdly, to propose easy guidelines for an accurate distinction between large larvae and paedomorphs based on an external sexual trait, which is essential for reproduction—the cloaca. More than half of the studies in the literature do not mention the diagnostic criteria used for determining adulthood. The criteria mentioned were the presence of mature gonads (10%), eggs laid (4%), courtship behavior (10%), and external morphological sexual traits (39%) including the cloaca (24%). Body-size thresholds should not be used as a proxy for paedomorphosis, because overwintering larvae can reach a larger size than paedomorphs within the same populations. In contrast, diagnosis based on cloacal external morphology is recommended, as it can be processed by the rapid visual assessment of all caught specimens, thus providing straightforward data at the individual level for both sexes.

Keywords: amphibians, cloacal morphology, facultative paedomorphosis, neoteny, review, secondary sexual traits, sexual dimorphism, sexual maturity.


Many species of newts and salamanders are biphasic and show the successive use of aquatic and terrestrial habitats across life stages (Griffiths 1996; Petranka 1998). This involves the metamorphosis of an aquatic gilled larva into a terrestrial juvenile phenotype. One of the features of this shift is the resorption of the external gills and the closure of gill slits (Ivanović et al. 2011). However, in some populations, a part of the aquatic larvae do not metamorphose and acquire sexual maturity while retaining larval morphology, including gills (Džukić et al. 1990; Breuil 1992; Whiteman 1994; Denoël et al. 2005). The polymorphism, named facultative paedomorphosis, therefore produces two alternative adult phenotypes: paedomorphs and metamorphs. The term “paedomorphosis” is here used to describe the acquisition of sexual reproduction in larvae, that is, in gilled individuals (Garstang 1922; McKinney and McNamara 1991; Denoël et al. 2005). Although paedomorphosis is rarer than metamorphosis, it is found in a large number of species and is often locally abundant in the geographic areas where it is expressed. In newts, facultative paedomorphosis is particularly observed in Ichthyosaura alpestris, Lissotriton helveticus, and Lissotritonvulgaris in Europe (Džukić et al. 1990; Andreone and Dore 1991; Denoël 2007; Denoël et al. 2009a) and in Notophthalmus viridescens in North America (Wilbur and Collins 1973; Takahashi et al. 2011). It is also present in other families, such as ambystomatid salamanders (Sexton and Bizer 1978; Shaffer and Voss 1996; Whiteman et al. 2012).

However, the persistence of aquatic larvae for longer than usual does not necessarily involve a strictly speaking paedomorphic process (i.e., involving maturity). Indeed, in some populations, larvae do not metamorphose before winter and are then found the year after they hatched from eggs. These larvae are larger than the typical larval cohorts born after winter and coexist with them (Ernst 1952; Grossenbacher 1979; Denoël et al. 2016). They are called overwintering (immature) larvae (Harris 1987) and they can metamorphose during their first year, that is, before the second winter. However, they can also spend more than one winter in water before metamorphosing, or can be present at intermediate developmental stages before the acquisition of sexual maturity in a paedomorphic stage (Sexton and Bizer 1978; Breuil 1992; Wissinger et al. 2010). As they are larger than the usual size at metamorphosis, they can be seen as branchiate juveniles in comparison with the terrestrial juvenile stage that becomes a metamorph at adulthood (Fasola and Canova 1992; Denoël and Joly 2001) and can also reach similar sizes to some paedomorphs, but cannot reproduce.

Both phenomena, that is, the overwintering of larvae and paedomorphosis, are interesting processes in ecology and evolution as well as in conservation, because they represent examples of intraspecific diversity (Emel and Bonett 2011; Denoël and Winandy 2015; Denoël et al. 2016). However, it is essential to distinguish between both states, because they can be produced by various processes and have different implications. Overwintering larvae can be the result of late breeding, second breeding as a maximization on autumnal rains or slow development that prevents metamorphosis before winter (Ernst 1952; Andreone and Dore 1992; Wissinger and Whiteman 1992). In contrast, paedomorphosis involves maturity and can be regarded as a longer-term strategy. Facultative paedomorphosis has indeed been shown to be adaptive in newts and salamanders in allowing either early reproduction or an optimal use of resources and adaptation to local environmental conditions (Semlitsch 1987; Denoël et al. 2005; Denoël and Ficetola 2014). Because maturity is a key life-history trait (Ryan and Semlitsch 1998), the presence of a sexual trait would be expected to be a major diagnostic trait for separating these processes. However, this is often not the case, as body size is also used to describe paedomorphs (see e.g., van Gelder 1973). Therefore, it might be difficult to establish whether studied specimens are larvae (i.e., immature gilled individuals) or paedomorphs (i.e., adult gilled individuals). Unfortunately, no review is currently available to determine what are the diagnostic sexual traits used in the literature, and their respective advantages and drawbacks.

In this context, the aim of this study was 3-fold: firstly, to perform a meta-analysis of the identification procedures carried out in the literature; secondly, to survey natural newt populations to determine the effectiveness of body size to make inferences about adulthood, and thirdly, to propose easy guidelines for an accurate distinction between larvae and paedomorphs based on an external sexual trait, which is essential for reproduction—the cloaca (Sever and Staub 2011).

Material and Methods

Literature analysis

An analysis of the literature on paedomorphosis in the last five decades (1966–2015) was performed to draw conclusions on the presence and absence of criteria used to identify paedomorphs in pond-breeding newts (genera Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Notophthalmus, Ommatotriton, and Triturus; family Salamandridae). A focus was done on this group because facultative paedomorphosis is often reported in species of these genera and because they share similar life-history, morphological and behavioral traits. Reference data (articles in journals and proceedings) were extracted from Scopus, the ISI Web of Science, and the OVID and Google Scholar databases, using combinations of keywords on newts and paedomorphosis (and associated terms), which were then supplemented by searches of the citations in the obtained papers. The meta-analysis was based on 160 references (Supplementary Table S1).

Field data

Newts at either of the two life stages (i.e., overwintering larvae and paedomorphs) were sampled by dip-netting in two natural populations. Because male and female newts are sexually dimorphic, both sexes of paedomorphs were collected. The studied larvae had spent the previous winter in water, as indicated by their large size. Palmate newts (L. helveticus) were sampled, in a pond from a traditional agricultural area (La Clastre, Larzac, Hérault, France; 43°50'40''N–3°30'44"E) while alpine newts (I. alpestris) were sampled from an alpine lake (Lac de la Cabane, Alpes de Haute Provence, France; 44°24'7"N–6°24'40"E). Sampling occurred during the reproductive period (May 2014) at the first site and after the reproductive period (August 1997 and July 2014) at the second site, to show the persistence of traits in these two periods and their presence in species from different genera. These two sites were taken as representative examples over more than one hundred populations personally studied in Europe (see e.g., Denoël et al. 2009a; Denoël and Ficetola 2014). Newts were photographed (Nikon D610, 60-mm lens) during the 2014 surveys. Special attention was paid to the cloaca, to provide data on a qualitative trait that can be used for pond-breeding newts regardless of the species or population considered. This criterion was used to distinguish paedomorphs from larvae. Gilled individuals (including paedomorphs) were distinguished from metamorphs by the presence of gill slits and external gills. Newts were measured (snout-vent length, i.e., from the tip of the snout to the posterior edge of the cloaca), to determine the largest size of larvae and the smallest size of adults, therefore allowing to verify the validity of a size threshold in the identification of paedomorphs (n = 44 for L. helveticus in May 2014 and n =168 for I. alpestris in August 1997).

Results

A meta-analysis of the literature

In 46% of the references (n = 74 out of 160), the criteria for the identification of paedomorphs were indicated, which included the presence of mature gonads (10% out of the 160 references), eggs laid (4%), courtship behavior (10%) and external morphological traits (39%), including the cloaca (24%) (Figure 1). About 26% of papers contained at least one photograph of the branchiate newts in support of the descriptions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Proportion of studies on newt paedomorphosis (1966–2015) that mentioned sexual traits, morphological external sexual trait, cloacal shape, mature gonads, courtship behavior, and laid eggs to identify paedomorphs (i.e., gilled adults).

Differences between paedomorphs and overwintering larvae

In the two studied populations, the largest overwintering larvae were larger than the smallest paedomorphs. In L. helveticus from La Clastre, there were few overwintering larvae (i.e., 7%) in the sampling of gilled overwintering individuals. The snout-vent length of the smallest paedomorph was 33 mm versus 37 mm in the largest larva (mean ± SE = 38.1 ± 0.4 mm and 34.3 ± 1.8 mm, respectively). There were 39% size overlap between the two life stages. In I. alpestris from Lac de la Cabane, there were numerous overwintering larvae (branchiate juveniles) (i.e., 39%). The smallest paedomorph was 44 mm versus 55 mm for the largest branchiate juvenile (mean ± SE = 51.8 ± 0.3 mm and 45.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively). There were 86% size overlap between the two life stages (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Size structure of overwintering larvae (i.e., gilled immature individuals) and paedomorphs (i.e., gilled adults) in alpine newts Ichthyosaura alpestris in La Cabane Lake (France). The gray area represents the size overlap between both life stages.

In both species, paedomorphs and larvae were characterized by a different cloacal shape, as illustrated in both the lateral (Figures 3 and 4) and ventral views (Figure 5). In larvae, including the 1st-year overwintering cohort and the older branchiate juveniles, the cloaca was only a slit, which was slightly swollen in the largest individuals, but remained thin and smooth, that is, much less developed than in adults. In paedomorphic males, the signs of maturity were a well-swollen cloaca that did not contain grooves on its external surface. The male cloaca had a rather spherical shape, which occasionally possessed some surface relief, and a vent that was more or less open and bordered by papillae. In paedomorphic females, the cloaca always contained some types of grooves on its external surface and was generally relatively small and had varied shapes (elongated, spherical, or heart-shaped). Outside the reproductive period, the cloaca was less developed; however, it usually maintained a larger and less smooth shape, and a more pronounced coloration that differentiated it from that of larvae.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lateral view of the branchiate life stages of palmate newts Lissotriton helveticus during the breeding season (left; Larzac, May) and alpine newts Ichthyosaura alpestris after the breeding season (right; Lac de la Cabane, July): overwintering larvae (top), paedomorphic females (center) and paedomorphic males (bottom). Sexual traits (e.g., developed cloaca) are only present in paedomorphs (i.e., gilled adults).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Lateral view of the cloaca of the branchiate life stages of palmate newts Lissotriton helveticus during the breeding season (left; Larzac, May) and alpine newts Ichthyosaura alpestris after the breeding season (right; Lac de la Cabane, July): overwintering larvae (up), paedomorphic females (middle), and paedomorphic males (bottom). Paedomorphs are gilled adults.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Ventral view of the cloaca of the branchiate life stages of palmate newts Lissotriton helveticus during the breeding season (left; Larzac, May) and alpine newts Ichthyosaura alpestris after the breeding season (right; Lac de la Cabane, July): overwintering larvae (top), paedomorphic females (center), and paedomorphic males (bottom). Paedomorphs are gilled adults.

During the reproductive period in May, paedomorphic male palmate newts not only possessed an enlarged cloaca, but also secondary sexual traits, such as a more conspicuous coloration, a tail filament, and partially developed foot-webbing. These traits were absent in larvae. After the reproductive season, paedomorphic male alpine newts had a more conspicuous coloration than that of larvae. In both species, paedomorphic females more resembled larvae than the males, but in addition to the cloacal difference, they often had a more conspicuous coloration. However, it was not always possible to distinguish large overwintering larvae from adults by coloration only. In particular, not all paedomorphs showed the conspicuous adult nuptial dress. As paedomorphs have the typical dorso-caudal crest of the larval stage, this sexually dimorphic trait was not always as obvious as in metamorphs.

Discussion

Although finding large branchiate newts can suggest they are adults, caution is needed, due to individual, population, and species variations in the size at maturity (Miaud et al. 2000; Ficetola et al. 2010; Colleoni et al. 2014). The same large body size can be then associated with reproduction in some populations but not in others (Denoël and Joly 2000; Denoël et al. 2016). As shown here, even within the same population, some branchiate larvae can reach larger sizes than paedomorphs. Although larvae are smaller than paedomorphs in some other populations (see e.g., Denoël and Winandy 2014), the large size overlap between life stages that was found here indicates that using only body size to make inferences concerning paedomorphosis (i.e., sexual maturity while retaining gills) is not a valid approach (see also Semlitsch 1985 for ambystomatid salamanders). The only way to make a confident assessment is to find evidence of primary or secondary sexual traits.

A search of the literature of the last five decades (1966–2015) showed that more than half the published papers did not mention any sexual criteria for the identification of paedomorphs. This does not mean that these studies did not use other traits than size to make inferences about adulthood and it is probable that in many studies, the authors accurately identified paedomorphs and overwintering larvae. However, the absence of diagnostic criteria in the literature leads to doubts, especially for field-based studies in which the paedomorphic process is described for the first time at a new locality and for very few individuals. Furthermore, even in-depth research might contain some biases in the identification of paedomorphs, particularly at the level of individuals. For instance, Gabrion and Sentein (1976) considered paedomorphosis on the basis of the development of sexual traits, and also incorporating a minimum size threshold. Although this means that paedomorphs were clearly present in the studied palmate newt populations, this does not exclude the possibility that some large branchiate individuals might have been counted as paedomorphs and vice-versa around the transitional size threshold. Indeed, smaller paedomorphs and larger larvae than the threshold sizes can be found in the populations studied by Gabrion and Sentein (Denoël M, personal observation). However, as the authors considered sexual traits thoroughly, the examined paedomorphic specimens were probably mature. In contrast, in a long-term field study of paedomorphic palmate newts, van Gelder (1973) could not always distinguish paedomorphs from larvae and used an arbitrary threshold size for classification.

Various sexual traits were listed in the literature to support the adult state of branchiate newts. The presence of functional gonads and mature gametes is clearly proof of reproduction (Kalezić et al. 1996). Such primary traits were used in 10% of the studies. Another effective way was to carry out field or laboratory observations of courtship behavior and sperm transfer (Bovero et al. 1997; Denoël et al. 2001) and to report eggs laid by paedomorphs (Kaya et al. 2008; Başkale et al. 2011; Gvoždík et al. 2013). These methods were performed relatively rarely in the literature, with only 10% of references reporting courtship, and 4%, eggs.

Although determining the presence of traits such as functional gonads, gametes, courtship, or eggs provides insight into the study of paedomorphosis, this cannot be performed for all the individuals of a population, for both ethical and conservation reasons. Knowing the abundance of each morph and their sex, and therefore, their proportions in the populations, is essential in many scientific disciplines (Whiteman 1997; Arntzen 2002; Denoël and Ficetola 2014). Using rapidly assessed traits for large sample sizes and numerous populations is then particularly relevant. Therefore, it is not surprising that 39% of the studies on newt paedomorphosis used external (morphological) sexual traits for diagnosis. This approach was particularly used for species that are characterized by a conspicuous sexual dimorphism (Griffiths 1996; Petranka 1998). For instance, male palmate newts have a long tail filament and webbing between their toes appears at the time of breeding (Halliday 1975; Cornuau et al. 2012). However, these secondary sexual traits are less developed in paedomorphs than in metamorphs (Denoël et al. 2001; Winandy and Denoël 2015) and the tail filament can occasionally be damaged (Denoël M, personal observation). Color patterns can also be effectively used to distinguish larvae and paedomorphs (Kalezić and Džukić 1985; Ceacero et al. 2010; Denoël M, personal observation). However, large larvae can sometimes have similar color patterns to paedomorphs, particularly females (see also Breuil and Thuot 1983). Males exhibit more conspicuous traits than females, but some paedomorphic individuals lack the nuptial coloration that is typical of metamorphic males (Denoël M, personal observation). The external criterion that is most useful in both sexes is the cloaca; despite this, only 24% of studies reported its use for identifying adulthood in branchiate newts.

The cloaca of newts is an essential organ for reproduction (Sever and Staub 2011). In both sexes, but particularly in males, cloacal glands produce sex pheromones that allow the attraction of mates during courtship (Malacarne and Vellano 1987; Kikuyama et al. 1997; Treer et al. 2013; Janssenswillen et al. 2015; Van Bocxlaer et al. 2015). In males, the cloaca is also involved in the synthesis of spermatophore components (Osikowski and Cierniak-Zuzia 2013) and is displayed to females during sperm transfer (Denoël 2003). In females, the cloaca is important for sperm transfer and storage, as it is more open in receptive females and protracted when females follow the males after spermatophore deposition and then pick up the spermatophore, which allows the sperm to be stored in the spermathecae (Halliday 1974, 1975; Sever 2002; Janssenswillen and Bossuyt 2016). As all these functions are only required in adults, the cloacal glands are not present in larvae (Sever and Staub 2011). The external shape of the cloaca can therefore allow the rapid identification of overwintering larvae versus paedomorphs. The smallest paedomorphs identified as such were mature, because the males displayed courtship behavior, including the deposition of spermatophores and the females laid fertilized eggs that gave viable larvae in laboratory experiments in both palmate and alpine newts (Denoël et al. 2001; Denoël M, unpublished data). Moreover, a correspondence between the development of gonads and that of the cloaca has been established in newts (Vilter and Vilter 1963). The size of the cloaca is also correlated with seasonal secondary traits such as the foot-web and tail filament in palmate newts (Winandy and Denoël 2015). On another hand, large or overwintering larvae, determined as such by the shape of the cloaca, were never observed to display courtship behavior or lay eggs (Denoël M, personal observation). The shape of the cloaca is thus a qualitative criterion that should be used to distinguish between paedomorphs and overwintering larvae.

Although body size and proportions can be permanently sexually dimorphic in adult newts (Denoël et al. 2009b; Reinhard and Kupfer 2015), the traits associated with mating (e.g., the tail filament, the dorsal crest, or the tail height) show seasonal patterns of expression and consequently cannot be always assessed all the year round (Griffiths and Mylotte 1988; Andreone and Dore 1992; Secondi et al. 2009; Bloch and Grayson 2010). Courtship behavior and egg-laying are also inherently linked to the reproductive period only (Verrell and McCabe 1988). The same applies to the formation of gametes in gonads (Verrell et al. 1986). However, the breeding period is usually long in newts (often several months) (Gabrion et al. 1977) and external morphological traits can remain visible throughout its duration in both metamorphs and paedomorphs (Griffiths and Mylotte 1988; Winandy and Denoël 2015). Specifically, repeated observations on the same paedomorphs (in both the alpine and palmate newts) across time showed that they maintained external sexual traits during and even beyond the mating period (Winandy and Denoël 2015; Denoël M, unpublished data). Most research occurs mainly during the breeding period, thus efficiently making use of seasonal external sexual traits. Moreover, even if the cloaca of adults becomes smaller over time (Vilter and Vilter 1963), it retains its shape characteristics in paedomorphs. One exception is particularly for skinny paedomorphs that can show a less differentiated cloaca than healthy newts (Denoël M, unpublished data). In case of doubts, it is recommended to avoid classification of the individuals as paedomorphs.

This study focused on newt species because they share ecological and morphological traits. In addition to the two examples presented here in detail, the qualitative external diagnosis of paedomorphs on the basis of their cloaca can be generalized to other populations and has already been applied in over 100 localities in several European countries (Denoël M, unpublished data; see locations of the main populations in Denoël 2007; Denoël et al. 2009a). This is also valid for other salamandrid genera, such as Triturus (Djorović and Kalezić 1996) and Notophthalmus (Takahashi et al. 2011). Although the cloaca is more diverse in other families, such as ambystomatids, distinguishing sex based on the cloacal shape has also been successfully performed during the breeding season (Trauth et al. 1994; Whiteman and Semlitsch 2005). Moreover, studies in ambystomatids showed that paedomorphs have a similar cloacal structure to that of metamorphs (Licht and Sever 1991; Trauth et al. 1994).

Only one-quarter of studies provided photographs of the paedomorphs or overwintering larvae, which often clearly showed the adulthood of the specimens examined (Dörr et al. 1985; Covaciu-Marcov et al. 2013; Gvoždík et al. 2013). However, when images of females did not depict the cloaca in detail, it became more difficult to verify the maturity status. Although it was previously difficult to include pictures in many journals due to space limitations, the current development of online archives now makes this possible.

In conclusion, future studies should avoid using only body size as a proxy for paedomorphosis, and should detail the criteria that are used for identifying sexual maturity, and should possibly use a combination of approaches, depending on the objectives and the characteristics of the studied populations. The advantage of using the shape of the cloaca is that adulthood can be rapidly assessed in both sexes at the individual level and throughout the whole year, thus providing accurate data for research.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

I thank R.A. Griffiths, A. Osikowski, D. Sever, L. Winandy, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. Capture permits were provided by DREAL (Languedoc Roussillon and Rhône-Alpes, France).

Funding

This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS under grant number J.0112.16 and the Fonds Spéciaux de la Recherche—FSR (University of Liège) under grant number C11/23. M. Denoël is a Senior Research Associate at Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique and a member of the Applied and Fundamental Fish Research Center (AFFISH-RC).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material can be found at http://www.cz.oxfordjournals.org/.

References

  1. Andreone F, Dore B,. 1991. New data on paedomorphism in Italian populations of the Alpine newt Triturus alpestris (Laurenti, 1768) (Caudata: Salamandridae). Herpetozoa 4:149–156. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreone F, Dore B,. 1992. Adaptation of the reproductive cycle in Triturus alpestris apuanus to an unpredictable habitat. Amphibia–Reptilia 13:251–261. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arntzen JW, 2002. Seasonal variation in sex ratio and asynchronous presence at ponds of male and female Triturus newts. J Herpetol 36:30–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. Başkale E, Sayim F, Kaya U,. 2011. Body size and reproductive characteristics of paedomorphic and metamorphic individuals of the northern banded newt Ommatotriton ophryticus. Acta Herpetol 6:19–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloch AM, Grayson KL,. 2010. Reproductive costs of migration for males in a partially migrating, pond-breeding amphibian. Can J Zool 88:1113–1120. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bovero S, Giacoma C, Andreone F,. 1997. Sexual selection and facultative paedogenesis in the Alpine newt Triturus alpestris apuanus (Bonaparte, 1839). Geobios 21:287–292. [Google Scholar]
  7. Breuil M, 1992. La néoténie dans le genre Triturus: mythes et réalités. Bull Soc Herpétol France 61:11–44. [Google Scholar]
  8. Breuil M, Thuot M,. 1983. Eco-ethology of neotenic Alpine newt Triturus alpestris montenegrinus Radovanovic 1951 in Lake Bukumir (Montenegro, Yugoslavia): examination of lake communities features and proposal of an ecological determination for neoteny. Glasnik Republicki Zavod Za Zdravstvenu Zastitu Prirode—Prirodnjackog Muzeja Titograd 16:85–96. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceacero F, Donaire-Barroso D, Garcia-Munoz E, Beltran JF, Tejedo M,. 2010. On the occurrence of facultative paedomorphosis in the three newt species of Southern Iberian Peninsula (Amphibia, Salamandridae). Amphibia-Reptilia 31:571–575. [Google Scholar]
  10. Colleoni E, Denoël M, Padoa-Schioppa E, Scali S, Ficetola GF,. 2014. Rensch’s rule and sexual dimorphism in salamanders: patterns and potential processes. J Zool 293:143–151. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornuau J, Rat M, Schmeller D, Loyau A,. 2012. Multiple signals in the palmate newt: ornaments help when courting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1045–1055. [Google Scholar]
  12. Covaciu-Marcov SD, Roşioru CL, Cicort-Lucaciu AS, Sas-Kovács I,. 2013. Lissotriton vulgaris (Amphibia) paedomorphs in Carei Plain natural protected area, North-Western Romania. North-West J Zool 9:217–220. [Google Scholar]
  13. Denoël M, 2003. Avantages sélectifs d'un phénotype hétérochronique. Eco-éthologie des populations pédomorphiques du Triton alpestre Triturus alpestris (Amphibia, Caudata). Cah Ethol 21:1–327. [Google Scholar]
  14. Denoël M, 2007. Priority areas of intraspecific diversity: larzac, a global hotspot for facultative paedomorphosis in amphibians. Anim Conserv 10:110–118. [Google Scholar]
  15. Denoël M, Ficetola GF,. 2014. Heterochrony in a complex world: disentangling environmental processes of facultative paedomorphosis in an amphibian. J Anim Ecol 83:606–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Denoël M, Ficetola GF, Ćirović R,, Radović D, Džukić G. et al. , 2009a. A multi-scale approach to facultative padomorphosis of European newts in the Montenegrin karst: distribution pattern, environmental variables and conservation. Biol Conserv 142:509–517. [Google Scholar]
  17. Denoël M, Ivanović A, Džukić G, Kalezić ML,. 2009b. Sexual size dimorphism in the evolutionary context of facultative paedomorphosis: insights from European newts. BMC Evol Biol 9:278.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Denoël M, Joly P,. 2000. Neoteny and progenesis as two heterochronic processes involved in paedomorphosis in Triturus alpestris (Amphibia: Caudata). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:1481–1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Denoël M, Joly P,. 2001. Size-related predation reduces intramorph competition in paedomorphic Alpine newts. Can J Zool 79:943–948. [Google Scholar]
  20. Denoël M, Poncin P, Ruwet JC,. 2001. Sexual compatibility between two heterochronic morphs in the Alpine newt Triturus alpestris. Anim Behav 62:559–566. [Google Scholar]
  21. Denoël M, Scime P, Zambelli N,. 2016. Newt life after fish introduction: extirpation of paedomorphosis in a mountain fish lake and newt use of satellite pools. Curr Zool 62:61–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Denoël M, Whiteman HH, Joly P,. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of facultative paedomorphosis in newts and salamanders. Biol Rev 80:663–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Denoël M, Winandy L,. 2014. Fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) in Larzac plateau: low occurrence, pond-breeding and cohabitation of larvae with paedomorphic palmate newts Lissotriton helveticus. Acta Herpetol 9:43–49. [Google Scholar]
  24. Denoël M, Winandy L,. 2015. The importance of phenotype diversity in conservation: resilience of palmate newt morphotypes after fish removal in Larzac ponds (France). Biol Conserv 192:402–408. [Google Scholar]
  25. Djorović A, Kalezić ML,. 1996. Paedomorphosis and morphometric variability: ontogenetic allometry in European newts of the genus Triturus. Spixiana 19:315–326. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dörr L, Martens H, Veith M,. 1985. Erstnachweis eines total neotenen Fademolches Triturus helveticus helveticus (Razoumowski, 1789) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Salamandra 21:86–89. [Google Scholar]
  27. Džukić G, Kalezić ML, Tvrtković M, Djorović A,. 1990. An overview of the occurrence of paedomorphosis in Yugoslav newt (Triturus, Salamandridae) populations. Br Herpetol Soc Bull 34:16–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Emel SL, Bonett RM,. 2011. Considering alternative life history modes and genetic divergence in conservation: a case study of the Oklahoma salamander. Conserv Genet 12:1243–1259. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ernst F, 1952. Biometrische Untersuchungen an schweizerischen Populationen von Triton alp. alpestris (Laur.). Rev Suisse Zool 59:399–476. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fasola M, Canova L,. 1992. Residence in water by the newts Triturus vulgaris, T. cristatus and T. alpestris in a pond in northern Italy. Amphibia–Reptilia 13:227–233. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ficetola GF, Scali S, Denoël M,, Montinaro G, Vukov TD. et al. , 2010. Ecogeographical variation of body size in amphibians: comparing the hypotheses using the newt Triturus carnifex. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:485–495. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gabrion J, Sentein P,. 1976. Structure histologique de la peau et phénomènes de dégénérescence chez Triturus helveticus Raz. au cours de la néoténie. Bull Soc Zool Fr 101:33–39. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gabrion J, Sentein P, Gabrion C,. 1977. Les populations néoténiques de Triturus helveticus Raz. des Causses et du Bas-Languedoc. I. Répartition et caractéristiques. Terre Vie 31:489–506. [Google Scholar]
  34. Garstang W, 1922. The theory of recapitulation: a critical re-statement of the biogenetic law. J Linn Soc Zool 35:81–101. [Google Scholar]
  35. Griffiths RA, 1996. Newts and Salamanders of Europe. London: T. & A. D. Poyser Natural History. [Google Scholar]
  36. Griffiths RA, Mylotte VJ,. 1988. Observations on the development of the secondary sexual characters of male newts Triturus vulgaris and Triturus helveticus. J Herpetol 22:476–480. [Google Scholar]
  37. Grossenbacher K, 1979. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschwindigkeit der Larven von Triturus a. alpestris (Laurenti 1768), Bufo b. bufo (Linnaeus 1758) und Rana t. temporaria (Linnaeus 1758) aus Populationen verschiedener Hoehenstufen in den Schweizer Alpen [PhD thesis]. Bern: Universität Bern.
  38. Gvoždík V, Javůrková V, Kopecký O,. 2013. First evidence of a paedomorphic population of the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris in the Czech Republic. Acta Herpetol 8:53–57. [Google Scholar]
  39. Halliday T, 1974. Sexual behaviour of the smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris (Urodela, Salamandridae). J Herpetol 8:277–292. [Google Scholar]
  40. Halliday TR, 1975. On the biological significance of certain morphological characters in males of the smooth newt Triturus vulgaris and of the palmate newt Triturus helveticus (Urodela: Salamandridae). Zool J Linn Soc 56:291–300. [Google Scholar]
  41. Harris RN, 1987. An experimental study of population regulation in the salamander Notophthalmus viridescens dorsalis (Urodela: Salamandridae). Oecologia 71:280–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ivanović A, Cvijanović M, Kalezić ML,. 2011. Ontogeny of body form and metamorphosis: insights from the crested newts. J Zool 283:153–161. [Google Scholar]
  43. Janssenswillen S, Bossuyt F,. 2016. Male courtship pheromones induce cloacal gaping in female newts (Salamandridae). PLoS ONE 11:e0144985.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Janssenswillen S, Vandebergh W, Treer D, Willaert B, Maex M. et al. , 2015. Origin and diversification of a salamander sex pheromone system. Mol Biol Evol 32:472–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kalezić ML, Cvetković D, Djorović A, Džukić G,. 1996. Alternative life-history pathways: paedomorphosis and adult fitness in European newts (Triturus vulgaris and T. alpestris). J Zool Syst Evol Res 34:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kalezić ML, Džukić G,. 1985. The frequent occurrence of paedomorphosis in the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) population from the submediterranean area of Yugoslavia. Amphibia–Reptilia 7:86–89. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaya U, Sayim F, Başkale E, Çevik IE,. 2008. Paedomorphosis in the banded newt Triturus vittatus (Jenyns, 1835). Belgian J Zool 138:196–197. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kikuyama S, Toyoda F, Yamamoto K, Tanaka S, Hayashi H,. 1997. Female-attracting pheromone in newt cloacal glands. Brain Res Bull 44:415–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Licht LE, Sever DM,. 1991. Cloacal anatomy of metamorphosed and neotenic salamanders. Can J Zool 69:2230–2233. [Google Scholar]
  50. Malacarne G, Vellano C,. 1987. Behavioral evidence of a courtship pheromone in the crested newt Triturus cristatus carnifex Laurenti. Copeia 1987:245–247. [Google Scholar]
  51. McKinney ML, McNamara KJ,. 1991. Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny. New York: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]
  52. Miaud C, Guyetant R, Faber H,. 2000. Age, size, and growth of the Alpine newt Triturus alpestris (Urodela: Salamandridae), at high altitude and a review of life-history trait variation throughout its range. Herpetologica 56:135–144. [Google Scholar]
  53. Osikowski A, Cierniak-Zuzia K,. 2013. Cloacal anatomy of the male carpathian newt Lissotriton montandoni (Amphibia, Salamandridae), in the breeding season. Zool Sci 30:748–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Petranka JW, 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Washington (DC: ): Smithsonian Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  55. Reinhard S, Kupfer A,. 2015. Sexual dimorphism in a French population of the marbled newt Triturus marmoratus (Urodela: Salamandridae). Salamandra 51:121–128. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ryan TJ, Semlitsch RD,. 1998. Intraspecific heterochrony and life history evolution: decoupling somatic and sexual development in a facultatively paedomorphic salamander. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5643–5648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Secondi J, Hinot E, Djalout Z, Sourice S, Jadas-Hécart A,. 2009. Realistic nitrate concentration alters the expression of sexual traits and olfactory male attractiveness in newts. Funct Ecol 23:800–808. [Google Scholar]
  58. Semlitsch RD, 1985. Reproductive strategy of a facultatively paedomorphic salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Oecologia 65:305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Semlitsch RD, 1987. Paedomorphosis in Ambystoma talpoideum: effects of density, food, and pond drying. Ecology 68:994–1002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sever DM, 2002. Female sperm storage in amphibians. J Exp Zool 292:165–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sever DM, Staub NL,. 2011. Hormones, sex accessory structures, and secondary sexual characteristics in amphibians In: Norris DO, Lopez KH, editors. Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, vol. 2 London: Academic Press, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sexton OJ, Bizer JR,. 1978. Life history patterns of Ambystoma tigrinum in montane Colorado. Am Midl Nat 99:101–118. [Google Scholar]
  63. Shaffer HB, Voss SR,. 1996. Phylogenetic and mechanistic analysis of a developmentally integrated character complex: alternate life history modes in ambystomatid salamanders. Am Zool 36:24–35. [Google Scholar]
  64. Takahashi MK, Takahashi YY, Parris MJ,. 2011. Rapid change in life-cycle polyphenism across a subspecies boundary of the Eastern Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens. J Herpetol 45:379–384. [Google Scholar]
  65. Trauth SE, Sever DM, Semlitsch RD,. 1994. Cloacal anatomy of paedomorphic female Ambystoma talpoideum (Caudata: Ambystomatidae), with comments on intermorph mating and sperm storage. Can J Zool 72:2147–2157. [Google Scholar]
  66. Treer D, Van Bocxlaer I, Matthijs S, Four DD,, Janssenswillen S. et al. , 2013. Love is blind: indiscriminate female mating responses to male courtship pheromones in newts (Salamandridae). PLoS ONE 8:e56538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Bocxlaer I, Treer D, Maex M,, Vandebergh W, Janssenswillen S, et al. , 2015. Side-by-side secretion of Late Palaeozoic diverged courtship pheromones in an aquatic salamander. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. van Gelder JJ, 1973. Ecological observations on amphibia in the Netherlands. II. Triturus helveticus helveticus Razoumowski: migration, hibernation and neoteny. Neth J Zool 23:86–108. [Google Scholar]
  69. Verrell P, McCabe N,. 1988. Field observations of the sexual behavior of the smooth newt Triturus vulgaris vulgaris (Amphibia, Salamandridae). J Zool Lond 214:533–545. [Google Scholar]
  70. Verrell PA, Halliday TR, Griffiths ML,. 1986. The annual reproductive cycle of the smooth newt Triturus vulgaris in England. J Zool Lond 210:101–119. [Google Scholar]
  71. Vilter V, Vilter A,. 1963. Recherches sur le déterminisme interne de l'évolution cloacale chez le Triton alpestre d'altitude. C R Soc Biol Paris 157:483–486. [Google Scholar]
  72. Whiteman HH, 1994. Evolution of facultative paedomorphosis in salamanders. Quart Rev Biol 69:205–221. [Google Scholar]
  73. Whiteman HH, 1997. Maintenance of polymorphism promoted by sex-specific fitness payoffs. Evolution 51:2039–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Whiteman HH, Semlitsch RD,. 2005. Asymmetric reproductive isolation among polymorphic salamanders. Biol J Linn Soc 86:265–281. [Google Scholar]
  75. Whiteman HH, Wissinger S, Denoël M,, Mecklin CJ, Gerlanc NM. et al. , 2012. Larval growth in polyphenic salamanders: making the best of a bad lot. Oecologia 168:109–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilbur HM, Collins JP,. 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Winandy L, Denoël M,. 2015. Expression of sexual ornaments in a polymorphic species: phenotypic variation in response to environmental risk. J Evol Biol 28:1049–1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wissinger SA, Whiteman HH,. 1992. Fluctuation in a Rocky Mountain population of salamanders: anthropogenic acidification or natural variation? J Herpetol 26:377–391. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wissinger SA, Whiteman HH, Denoël M, Mumford ML, Aubee CB,. 2010. Consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of cannibalism in fluctuating aged-structured populations. Ecology 91:549–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Current Zoology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES