Skip to main content
Current Zoology logoLink to Current Zoology
. 2016 Mar 8;62(3):215–219. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow009

Asiatic Callosciurus squirrels as seed dispersers of exotic plants in the Pampas

S Yasmin Bobadilla 1,*, Verónica V Benitez 1, M Laura Guichón 1,
PMCID: PMC5804237  PMID: 29491908

Abstract

Seed dispersal by exotic mammals exemplifies mutualistic interactions that can modify the habitat by facilitating the establishment of certain species. We examined the potential for endozoochoric dispersal of exotic plants by Callosciurus erythraeus introduced in the Pampas Region of Argentina. We identified and characterized entire and damaged seeds found in squirrel faeces and evaluated the germination capacity and viability of entire seeds in laboratory assays. We collected 120 samples of squirrel faeces that contained 883 pellets in seasonal surveys conducted between July 2011 and June 2012 at 3 study sites within the main invasion focus of C. erythraeus in Argentina. We found 226 entire seeds in 21% of the samples belonging to 4 species of exotic trees and shrubs. Germination in laboratory assays was recorded for Morus alba and Casuarina sp.; however, germination percentage and rate was higher for seeds obtained from the fruits than for seeds obtained from the faeces. The largest size of entire seeds found in the faeces was 4.2 × 4.0 mm, whereas the damaged seeds had at least 1 dimension ≥ 4.7 mm. Our results indicated that C. erythraeus can disperse viable seeds of at least 2 species of exotic trees. C. erythraeus predated seeds of other naturalized species in the region. The morphometric description suggested a restriction on the maximum size for the passage of entire seeds through the digestive tract of squirrels, which provides useful information to predict its role as a potential disperser or predator of other species in other invaded communities.

Keywords: Argentina, Callosciurus erythraeus, endozoochory, invasive species, mutualism


Invasive species elicit changes in ecological, economic, and social systems as a result of their new interactions in the recipient environment (Simberloff et al. 2013; Blackburn et al. 2014). Polinization and seed dispersal are clear examples of these animal–plant interactions that promote species integration in the invaded community (Traveset and Richarson 2006). Fruit consumption and seed hoarding by vertebrate species may develop into mutualistic interactions if viable seeds are deposited in suitable conditions far from the parental plant (Howe and Smallwood 1982; Vander Wall et al. 2005). If the interacting species are both introduced, a beneficial outcome for one or both species would favor establishment, growth and/or spread, enhancing the invasion process (Simberloff and Von Holle 1999; Simberloff 2006). Although the importance of studying dispersal of exotic plants by introduced species has been highlighted, there is still unexplored, fertile ground between invasion and dispersal ecology, particularly for vertebrate-dispersed plants (Traveset and Richardson 2006; Westcott and Fletcher 2011).

Several rodent species are among the most damaging invasive species due to their impact on biodiversity and human activities and health (Jones et al. 2008; Harris 2009). Rodents have multiple effects on seed destiny by either diminishing or increasing seed germination through seed predation or dispersal, respectively (Vander Wall and Longland 2004; Cheng et al. 2005; Traveset et al. 2009; Shiels and Drake 2010; Pearson et al. 2013). Potential and effective dispersal by seed-caching squirrels has been reported (Paschoal and Galetti 1995; Wauters and Casale 1996; Vander Wall 2003; Moore and Swihart 2007; Xiao et al. 2009; Zong et al. 2010); however, few studies (López-Darias and Nogales 2008) have evaluated their role in endozoochory. Although 18 squirrel species have been introduced worldwide (Bertolino 2009; Jessen et al. 2010) the role of squirrels as seed dispersers and predators in invaded communities have remained largely uninvestigated.

Asiatic squirrels of the genus Callosciurus have been introduced in several European countries, South America and Asia (Lurz et al. 2013). Red-bellied squirrels C. erythraeus were imported into Argentina in 1970, where they have now established several populations due to their charismatic appeal and ability to cope with new habitats (Benitez et al. 2013; Guichón et al. 2015). Red-bellied squirrels have established in rural and urban habitats where arboreal vegetation is highly fragmented and mainly composed of exotic trees that provide food and nesting resources (Guichón and Doncaster 2008). These arboreal squirrels feed mainly on fruits, seeds, and leaves (Lurz et al., 2013); however, apart from general foraging habits, the new squirrel–plant interactions established in the invaded communities have not been evaluated and few reports exist on their native range (e.g. caching behavior: Chou et al. 2011).

In this study, we aim to evaluate squirrel–plant interactions taking place in the main invasion focus in Argentina, where exotic trees have facilitated squirrel success (Guichón and Doncaster 2008; Benitez et al. 2013). In particular, we studied the role of red-bellied squirrels as endozoochoric seed dispersers of introduced trees and shrubs in the Pampas Region. We analyzed the percentage and rate of germination of seeds obtained from squirrel faeces, their viability, and morphometric variables of entire and damaged seeds. Positive feedback between introduced species would exemplify facilitation due to animal–plant interactions that might affect the dynamics and structure of the invaded community.

Material and Methods

Study area

We selected 3 study sites within the main invasion focus in Argentina, in the district of Luján (34°36′ S, 59°11′ W), North-eastern Buenos Aires province: 1) UNLu, the campus of the Universidad Nacional de Luján; 2) ACA, a recreational area 2.1 km from UNLu; and 3) Timón, another recreational area 10.3–12.2 km from the previous sites. These forested patches contain high squirrel density (15.3 ind/ha, CI 12.0–19.5, Benitez et al. 2013) and numerous arboreal species. Native grasslands of the Pampas region have been extensively modified by agriculture, livestock, and urbanization and are experiencing a woody invasion process (Ghersa et al. 2002). Squirrels use highly fragmented woodland patches in this rural and urban landscape (Guichón and Doncaster 2008). The arboreal vegetation is mainly composed of exotic species originally planted as windbreaks, for shade, ornamental purposes or timber and fruit production such as Gleditsia triacanthos, Morus alba, Populus spp., Melia azederach, Casuarina spp., Cupressus spp., Ligustrum spp., Pinus spp., Quercus spp., and Tilia spp. Exotic trees are used by red-bellied squirrels for food and nesting. The climate is moist and temperate with a mean annual temperature of 16.6°C and annual precipitation averaging 951 mm (Goldberg et al. 1995).

Faeces and seed collection

Between June 2011 and July 2012, we collected squirrel faeces and leaves, flowers, fruits and seeds to make a reference collection of all tree and shrub species present within a 3-ha area at each study site. Squirrel faeces were collected seasonally during 15 days at 10 locations in each site. Each collection point consisted of 1 m2 surfaces of either baited mesh traps at 1–2 m height hanging from tree branches or permanent tables that were carefully cleaned before each sampling season. The location of the faeces collection points was selected based on arboreal cover and daily movement of squirrels in each site. Squirrel faeces were identified in the field observing their size, color and shape, and by microscopic inspection in the laboratory of their rugosity and the presence of hairs of C. erythraeus (Fasola et al. 2005). All faeces collected in 1 trap or table per season were pooled into 1 sample that was submerged in distilled water for 30 min to facilitate pellet disintegration. Each sample was then filtered to retain fragments >500 µm, which were carefully observed under a binocular magnifying glass (10×) in order to separate all entire and damaged seeds that were identified using the reference collection. We measured the following morphometric variables of all seed species found in the faeces using 50 seeds per species from the reference collection: weight (We), length (L), width (Wi), and length to width rate (L/Wi). Entire seeds were refrigerated until we initiated the germination assay (<1 month in all cases).

Germination and viability assay

We evaluated seed germination capacity by sowing individually all entire seeds found in squirrel feaces in petri dishes (26 × 11 mm) with humid filter paper for a maximum of 30 days. We also sowed seeds belonging to the same species but obtained directly from the fruits within the study sites as a control treatment. During the assay, seeds were kept in a germination room (20–30°C, 12–12 h light–darkness) and observed every day to check for root emergence indicating seed germination. We calculated the germination percentage as the number of germinated seeds over the total number of sown seeds × 100 and the germination rate as the time elapsed until the germination of 50% of the sown seeds (Bewley and Black 1994). We analyzed differences in the proportion of germinated seeds obtained from the feaces and the control treatment using a test of homogeneity with the Yates corrected chi-square statistic.

We evaluated the viability of the seeds that did not germinate during the 30 days assays using a standard bioindicator (2,3,5 triphenil tetrazolium chloride (TTC)) that detects seed viability by staining the embryo tissue pink/red (Moore 1985). We determined seed viability observing seed coloration using microscope amplification in comparison with positive control seeds collected in the study sites.

Results

Faeces and seed collection

We collected ≥ 40 squirrel faeces in 10 samples per site in each season that yielded a total of 883 faeces in 120 samples throughout the study period. We found damaged seeds in 26% of the samples that corresponded to Ligustrum sinense, L. lucidum, and Melia azederach, whereas 21% of the samples contained 226 entire seeds of 4 exotic species plus 2 seeds that could not be identified (Table 1). Most (92%) entire seeds were found in spring and corresponded to only one species, Morus alba (Table 1). Therefore, only a small fraction of the 49 tree and shrub species recorded in the study sites, which included just 3 native species, were present in the faeces.

Table 1.

Number of faeces found in the 30 samples collected every season throughout the sampling year at 3 study sites within the main invasion focus in the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Season Number of faeces Species Germinated
Viable
Digested seeds Control seeds Digested seeds Control seeds
Winter 269 Casuarina sp. 4/8 (50%) 7/8 (88%) 0/4 0/1
Spring 186 Morus alba 141/209 (67%) 205/209 (98%) 0/68 0/4
Summer 172 Schinus molle 0/7 (—) 0/7 (—) 0/7 0/7
Autumn 256 Pyracantha sp. 0/1 (—) 0/1 (—) 0/1 0/1
Casuarina sp. 0/1 (—) 0/1 (—) 0/1 0/1

Number of germinated seeds over the total number of seeds sown for seeds obtained from the faeces (digested) and from the fruits (control); total seeds sown = 452. Number of viable seeds over total number of seeds tested for digested and control seeds that did not germinate in the assay; total seeds tested = 95.

Entire seeds found in squirrel faeces had a mean maximum size of 4.2 × 4.0 mm, whereas damaged seeds had at least 1 larger dimension (> 4.7 mm) (Table 2). High overlap between entire and damaged seeds was found in weight and length/width ratio (Table 2).

Table 2.

Growth form, fruit type, and morphometric measures (mean ± SD) of the 50 seeds measured for each species of entire and damaged seeds found in the faeces

Species Growth form Fruit type Width (mm) Lenght (mm) Length/Width Weight (mg)
Entire seeds
Casuarina sp. Tree Woody infrutescencia 1.6 ± 0.17 3.8 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 0.68 ± 0.15
Morus alba Tree Multiple fruit 1.7 ± 0.14 2.4 ± 0.12 1.4 ± 0.14 1.9 ± 0.5
Schinus molle Tree Drupe 4.2 ± 0.23 4.0 ± 0.22 1.0 ± 0.07 27.06 ± 5.29
Pyracantha sp. Shrub Pome 1.6 ± 0.10 2.3 ± 0.14 1.4 ± 0.09 2.5 ± 0.48
Damaged seeds
Ligustrum sinensi Shrub Drupe 2.7 ± 0.30 4.7 ± 0.45 1.8 ± 0.13 9.16 ± 1.5
Ligustrum lucidum Tree Drupe 2.9 ± 0.28 5.9 ± 0.64 2.0 ± 0.18 11.6 ± 2.1
Melia azedarach Tree Drupe 3.0 ± 0.35 7.3 ± 0.54 2.4 ± 0.36 25.2 ± 5.03

Germination and viability assay

Only 2 of the 4 species sown germinated during the assay, Casuarina sp. and Morus alba (Table 1). The 2 unidentified seeds did not germinate. Taking the 2 species together, seeds obtained from faeces (digested) showed a lower germination percentage (64%) than the seeds obtained from the fruits (control) (94%) (χc2 = 68.77, P < 0.001, df = 1); the same pattern was recorded in both species (Table 1). Germination rate was higher for the control treatment (3 days) than for the digested seeds (5 days) (Figure 1). All digested and control seeds that did not germinate during the assay were not viable (Table 1). Approximately, 50% of the 81 digested seeds that did not germinate were nonproductive seeds, that is empty seeds, poorly developed embryo, infected by fungi, whereas only 29% of the control seeds showed any of these conditions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Proportion of seeds germinated throughout the 30-day assay for seeds obtained from the faeces (digested, lower line) and from the fruits (control, upper line).

Discussion

The role of C. erythraeus as a seed disperser has been reported through seed caching and epizoochory (Xiao et al. 2009; Cao et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2013); however, this is the first study to analyze its role as endozoochorous disperser. Two of the four species of entire digested seeds did germinate, Morus alba and Casuarina spp. Morus alba is from China though it is extensively cultivated and naturalized in north and central Argentina (Ghersa et al. 2002). Its widespread distribution in Argentina mainly results from seed dispersal by birds (Delucchi 1989). This constitutes the first report of mammal mediated dispersal of M. alba in the region; however, dispersal of this species by other mammals such as Sus scrofa (Dovrat et al. 2012) and frugivorous bats (Galindo-Gonzáles 1998; Jordaan et al. 2011) was reported in other regions. As far as we know, this interaction between C. erythraeus and M. alba has not been reported previously in either native or introduced squirrel ranges worldwide. Seeds of Casuarina spp., species native to Australia and cultivated in Argentina, are mainly dispersed by wind and water though in their native range, dispersal by the cockatoo Calyptorhynchus lathami has also been reported (Wheeler et al. 2011). Callosciurus erythraeus is the first disperser reported for Casuarina spp. in our study region.

The passage through the digestive tract of C. erythraeus diminished both germination percentage and rate in comparison with the seeds obtained directly from the fruits. However, the relatively large number of seeds that germinated after ingestion by squirrels could provide an advantage if seeds are deposited in suitable sites, far from the parental tree (Schupp et al. 2010; Westcott and Fletcher 2011). Comparison with other dispersal agents to evaluate facilitation by these incipient new interactions should consider plant benefit resulting from deposition patterns of seeds, field germination success, and disperser abundance and habits regarding feeding and movement (Kitamura et al. 2006; Schupp et al. 2010). Furthermore, the identity and relative importance of each squirrel–plant interaction will largely depend on plant availability in the invaded community (Traveset 1998; Busch et al. 2012), as has been reported for Oryctolagus cuniculus that could disperse 8–50% of the available species depending on the community type (Dellafiore et al. 2009). This reinforces the need for further studies in other areas invaded by C. erythraeus in Argentina (Benitez et al. 2013; Guichón et al. 2015) and in other countries (Lurz et al. 2013) to detect new interactions and their impact on plant recruitment and community structure.

The potential to disperse and depredate 7 tree and shrub species represents only 14% of the available species in the study sites, although seed predation could be underestimated given that we did not conduct microhistological analysis of the faeces. In previous studies conducted in Argentina, 29% of the species available in the study sites were consumed by squirrels, and we also found seeds of M. azedarach, Pyracantha sp., and L. lucidum though seeds of another 16 species were recorded, including Juglands australis, Acer negundo, Fraxinus excelsior, Cupressus spp., and Crataegus monogyna (Zarco, Benitez and Guichón, unpublished data). Callosciurus erythraeus would be dispersing a small number of species according to our results, and thus it could play a more important role as seed predator. Seed predation by C. erythraeus has been reported in its native range (Chou et al. 2011; Sethi and Howe 2012) and other introduced areas where it consumes seeds avoided by native species (Tamura and Miyashita 1984; Corlett 2005). Other Callosciurus species, C. notatus and C. prevostii, also play a more important role as seed predators than dispersers in their native range (Becker and Wong 1985). Seed size could explain whether squirrels may act as a disperser or predator given that it affects ingestion mode, quantity of food consumed, dispersal form and the role of the disperser (Gautier-Hion et al. 1985; Montaldo 2005). Our results suggest that the maximum dimension for squirrels to digest entire seeds ranges 4.2–4.6 mm, though new studies evaluating a larger number of seed species are necessary to predict potential impact.

Our study has identified new interactions between introduced species; further studies may detect others in areas where a different set of species is available in the recipient community. We reinforce the importance of studies that may detect the role of squirrels as dispersers of exotic species or predators of native ones given the proximity of C. erythraeus to areas of high conservation value, such as the Natural Reserve Otamendi and the Delta Region of the Paraná river (Benitez et al. 2013; Guichón et al. 2015). Knowledge regarding squirrel–plant interactions in the invaded communities and size of seeds either dispersed or predated would contribute to the evaluation of potential impacts of squirrel establishment on species of conservation value or on species planted for agricultural production or ornamental purposes.

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Zubelzú and C. Lallana, who collaborated in the fieldwork and laboratory assays. M. Borgnia and C. Gozzi helped throughout the study; A. H. Maroder and J. F. Velazco provided advice and assistance with laboratory work; N. Apóstolo assessed with botanical identification. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of the article. This study was supported by Universidad Nacional de Luján.

References

  1. Becker P, Wong M, 1985. Seed dispersal, seed predation, and juvenile mortality of Aglaia sp. (Meliaceae) in lowland dipterocarp rainforest. Biotropica 17:230–237. [Google Scholar]
  2. Benitez VV, Almada Chavez S, Gozzi AC, Messetta ML, Guichón ML, 2013. Invasion status of Asiatic red-bellied squirrels in Argentina. Mamm Biol 78:164–170. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertolino S, 2009. Animal trade and non-indigenous species introduction: the world-wide spread of squirrels. Div Distribut 15:701–708. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bewley JD, Black M, 1994. Seeds Physiology of Development and Germination. 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Press, Chapter 1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackburn TM, Essl E, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM et al. , 2014. A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12:e1001850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Busch M, Knight C, Mazía CN, Hodara K, Muschetto M et al. , 2012. Rodent seed predation on tree invader species in grassland habitats of the inland Pampa. Ecol Res 27:369–376. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao L, Xiao Z, Guo C, Chen J, 2011. Scatter hoarding rodents as secondary seed dispersers of a frugivore dispersed tree Scleropyrum wallichianum in a defaunated Xishuangbanna tropical forest, China. Int Zool 6:227–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng J, Xiao Z, Zhang Z, 2005. Seed consumption and caching on seeds of three sympatric tree species by four sympatric rodent species in a subtropical forest, China. Forest Ecol Manag 216:331–341. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chou FS, Lin WC, Chen YH, Tsai JB, 2011. Seed fate of Castanopsis indica (Fagaceae) in a subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest. Botan Stud 52:321–326. [Google Scholar]
  10. Corlett RT, 2005. Interactions between birds, fruit bats and exotic plants in urban Hong Kong, South China. Urban Ecosyst 8:275–283. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dellafiore CM, Fernández JG, Vallés SM, 2009. The rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus as a seed disperser in a coastal dune system. Plant Ecol 206:251–261. [Google Scholar]
  12. Delucchi G, 1989. Morus alba (Moraceae), ampliación de su área geográfica en Argentina y observaciones sobre su naturalización. Darwiniana 29:405–406. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dovrat G, Perevolotsky A, Ne'eman G, 2012. Wild boars as seed dispersal agents of exotic plants from agricultural lands to conservation areas. J Arid Environ 78:49–54. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fasola L, Bello M, Guichón ML, 2005. Uso de trampas de pelo y caracterización de los pelos de la ardilla de vientre rojo Callosciurus erythraeus. Mastozool Neotrop 12:9–17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Galindo-Gonzáles J, 1998. Dispersión de semillas por murciélagos: su importancia en la conservación y regeneración del bosque tropical. Acta Zool Mexi 1:55–74. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gautier-Hion A, Duplantier JM, Quris R, Feer F, Sourd C et al. , 1985. Fruit characters as a basis of fruit choice and seed dispersal in a tropical forest vertebrate community. Oecologia 65:324.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghersa CM, De La Fuente E, Suarez S, León RJC, 2002. Woody species invasion in the Rolling Pampa grasslands, Argentina. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 88:71–278. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldberg S, Cirera I, Parella M, Benitez A, Bulos L et al. , 1995. Caracterización climática y agroclimática de la cuenca del Río Luján. In: Momo F, editor. Jornadas sobre la Cuenca del Río Luján. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Luján, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guichón ML, Benitez VV, Gozzi AC, Hertzriken M, Borgnia M, 2015. From a lag in vector activity to a constant increase of translocations: invasion of Callosciurus squirrels in Argentina. Biol Invasions 17:2597.. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guichón ML, Doncaster CP, 2008. Invasion dynamics of an introduced squirrel in Argentina. Ecography 31:211–220. [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris DB, 2009. Review of negative effects of introduced rodents on small mammals on islands. Biol Invasions 11:1611–1630. [Google Scholar]
  22. Howe FH, Smallwood J, 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jessen RR, Merrick MJ, Koprowski JL, Ramirez O, 2010. Presence of Guayaquil squirrels on the central coast of Peru: an apparent introduction. Mammalia 74:443–444. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones HP, Tershy BR, Zavaleta ES, Croll DA, Keitt BS et al. , 2008. Severity of the effects of invasive rats on seabirds: a global review. Conserv Biol 22:16–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jordaan LA, Johnson S, Downs CT, 2011. Wahlberg’s epauletted fruit bat Epomophorus wahlbergi as a potential dispersal agent for fleshy-fruited invasive alien plants: Effects of handling behaviour on seed germination. Biol Invasions 14:959.. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitamura S, Suzuki S, Yumoto T, Poonswad P, Chuailua P et al. , 2006. Dispersal of Canarium euphyllum (Burseraceae), a large-seeded tree species, in a moist evergreen forest in Thailand. J Trop Ecol 22:137–146. [Google Scholar]
  27. López-Darias M, Nogales M, 2008. Effects of the invasive Barbary ground squirrel Atlantoxerus getulus on seed dispersal systems of insular xeric environments. J Arid Environ 72:926–939. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lurz PW, Hayssen V, Geissler K, Bertolino S, 2013. Callosciurus erythraeus (Rodentia: Sciuridae). Mamm Species 48:60–74. [Google Scholar]
  29. Montaldo NH, 2005. Aves frugívoras de un relicto de selva subtropical ribereña en Argentina: manipulación de frutos y destino de las semillas. El Hornero 20:163–172. [Google Scholar]
  30. Moore RP, 1985. Handbook on Tetrazolium Testing. Zurich: International Seed Testing Association. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore JE, Swihart RK, 2007. Importance of fragmentation-tolerant species as seed dispersers in disturbed landscapes. Oecologia 151:663–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paschoal M, Galetti M, 1995. Seasonal food use by the neotropical squirrel Sciurus ingrami in Southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 27:268–273. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pearson DE, Hierro JL, Chiuffo M, Villarreal D, 2013. Rodent seed predation as a biotic filter influencing exotic plant abundance and distribution. Biol Invasions 16:1185–1196. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schupp EW, Jordano P, Gómez JM, 2010. Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review. New Phytologist 188:333–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sethi P, Howe HF, 2012. Fruit removal by hornbills in a semi-evergreen forest of the Indian Eastern Himalaya. J Trop Ecol 28:531–541. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shiels AB, Drake RD, 2010. Are introduced rats Rattas rattus both seed predators and dispersers in Hawaii? Biol Invasions 13:883.. [Google Scholar]
  37. Simberloff D, Von Holle B, 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32. [Google Scholar]
  38. Simberloff D, 2006. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA et al. , 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trend Ecol Evol 28:58–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tamura N, Miyashita M, 1984. Diurnal activity of the Formosan squirrel Callosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis, and its seasonal change with feeding. J Mammal Soc Japan 10:37–40. [Google Scholar]
  41. Traveset A, 1998. Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores' guts on germination: a review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1:151–190. [Google Scholar]
  42. Traveset A, Nogales M, Alcover JA, Delgado JD, López-Daria M et al. , 2009. A review on the effects of alien rodents in the Balearic (Western Mediterranean Sea) and Canary Islands (Eastern Atlantic Ocean). Biol Invasions 11:1653.. [Google Scholar]
  43. Traveset A, Richardson DM, 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trend Ecol Evol 21:208–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vander Wall SB, 2003. Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on sechondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents. Oikos 10025–34. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Beck MJ, 2005. Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vander Wall SB, Longland WS, 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trend Ecol Evol 19:151–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wauters LA, Casale P, 1996. Long-term scatterhoarding by Eurasian red squirrels Sciurus vulgaris. J Zoology 238:195–207. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wheeler GS, Taylor GS, Gaskin JF, Purcell MF, 2011. Ecology and management of Sheoak (Casuarina spp.), an invader of coastal Florida, USA. J Coastal Res 27:485–492. [Google Scholar]
  49. Westcott DA, Fletcher CS, 2011. Biological invasions and the study of vertebrate dispersal of plants: Opportunities and integration. Acta Oecologica 37:650–656. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xiao Z, Gao X, Jiang M, Zhang Z, 2009. Behavioral adaptation of Pallas's squirrels to germination schedule and tannins in acorns. Behav Ecol 20:1050–1055. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhou Y, Newman C, Xie Z, Macdonald DW, 2013. Peduncles elicit large-mammal endozoochory in a dry-fruited plant. Ann Botany 112:85–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zong C, Wauters LA, Van Dongen S, Mari V, Romeo C et al. , 2010. Annual variation in predation and dispersal of Arolla pine (Pinus cembra L.) seeds by Eurasian red squirrels and other seed-eaters. Forest Ecol Manag 260:587.. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Zoology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES