Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Synlett. 2016 Nov 7;28(3):371–375. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1588638

High-Yielding Automated Convergent Synthesis of No-Carrier-Added [11C-Carbonyl]-Labeled Amino Acids Using the Strecker Reaction

Junhao Xing a,b, Allen F Brooks a, Dylan Fink a, Huibin Zhang b, Morand R Piert a, Peter J H Scott a,c, Xia Shao a,
PMCID: PMC5804752  NIHMSID: NIHMS937852  PMID: 29430080

Abstract

A new variant of the Strecker synthesis using no-carrier-added [11C]cyanide for the synthesis of radiolabeled amino acids is described. The protocol is fully automated using a radiochemistry synthesis module and applied to the production of a number of new PET radiotracers. [11C-Carbonyl]sarcosine, [11C-carbonyl]methionine, [11C-carbonyl]-N-phenylglycine, and [11C-carbonyl]glycine are all synthesized in moderate to good radiochemical yields. The synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine has been validated for production of doses for clinical use, and preliminary evaluation of the new radiotracer in PC3 tumor-bearing mice is also reported.

Keywords: PET imaging, PET radiochemistry, carbon-11

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms937852u1.jpg


Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a functional imaging technique in which patients are injected with a radiotracer, a bioactive molecule tagged with a positron-emitting radionuclide such as 11C or 18F.1 Increasing availability of PET instrumentation around the world is associated with the expanding use of PET imaging in individualized healthcare and drug discovery.2 Unmet clinical challenges in the early diagnosis and/or staging of disease, as well as the pharmaceutical industry’s ■■OK?■■ need to radiolabel new drug scaffolds on an ongoing basis, has created an urgency for development of new PET radiotracers as well as reliable methods for their production.

Radiolabeled amino acids and related compounds are an important group of PET radiotracers used in oncologic imaging, as well as applications in neuroimaging such as neuro-oncology and Parkinson’s disease.3 When radiolabeling such molecules, it is desirable to use 11C so that the final product is structurally identical to the endogenous molecule. This simplifies translation into clinical use because extensive pharmacology and toxicology testing is often not required for radiolabeled versions of endogenous molecules in contrast to, for example, fluorinated analogues designed for incorporation of 18F (e.g., [11C]choline vs. [18F]fluorocholine). Moreover, the half-life of 11C (20 min) allows dual radiotracer studies to be undertaken in a patient on the same day, during a single hospital visit.

In connection with our program developing PET radiotracers based upon sarcosine for prostate cancer imaging, we initially synthesized [11C]sarcosine 1, which was readily accessible by simple N-methylation of methyl glycinate with [11C]methyl triflate, followed by ester hydrolysis (see Supporting Information for details). While we were pleased to see the expected uptake of the radiotracer in preclinical models of prostate cancer (see Supporting Information),4 we had concerns that volatile [11C]CO2 would be exhaled during PET scans because of the metabolic demethylation of sarcosine promoted by sarcosine dehydrogenase.5 This enzyme converts [11C]sarcosine into glycine, with release of [11C]formaldehyde, with the latter being subsequently converted into [11C]CO2, via [11C]formic acid, and exhaled. These concerns proved well founded, and the charcoal filters on the rodent anesthesia machines were found to have retained significant radioactivity (ca. 8–10% of the injected dose) following the pre-clinical PET scans. To overcome this limitation of the radiotracer, we next wished to evaluate [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 as an alternate design (Figure 1), reasoning that moving the labeled carbon would reduce or eliminate exhalation of volatile [11C]CO2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Radiolabeled versions of sarcosine under evaluation

The synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 was expected to be more complicated. To label the carbonyl moiety, we initially focused on [11C]CO2 fixation strategies recently reported by our group6 and others,7 using either a Grignard reagent or organolithium, but the key halogenated intermediate required for either approach proved unstable (see Supporting Information). We next considered whether 2 could be accessed using [11C]cyanide, either via a nucleophilic substitution, or using the Strecker reaction, and subsequent conversion of the cyanide into the carboxylic acid. Similar to the organometallic approaches described above, the requisite precursor for the SN2 approach could never be synthesized (see Supporting Information), and we therefore focused our efforts on the Strecker reaction.

The Strecker reaction, first reported in 1850,8 is a valuable multicomponent reaction for synthesizing amino acids from aldehydes or ketones (Scheme 1).9 Traditionally, an aldehyde is condensed with ammonium chloride in the presence of a source of cyanide (usually potassium cyanide) to form an α-aminonitrile, which is subsequently hydrolyzed to yield the corresponding amino acid. Radiochemical versions,10 employing [11C]cyanide10a–h,10j–n or [11C]aldehydes,10i have also been developed for the convergent radiosynthesis of amino acid based PET tracers. We noted several limitations with these early examples, however: i) most reported examples require the need for addition of carrier cyanide or intermediate purifications, likely due to residual components from production of [11C]cyanide (e.g., ammonia) poisoning the reaction(s); ii) carrier-added syntheses by definition provide radiotracers with lower specific activities; and iii) early reactions were often conducted in sealed tubes, because of the high temperatures and pressures required, making them incompatible with modern automated radiochemistry synthesis modules. To address this, we have modified the Strecker reaction and herein report a new no-carrier-added (n.c.a.) version that is fully automated using a TRACERLab synthesis module and apply it to the synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine as well as several other labeled amino acids of interest to our clinical and preclinical imaging colleagues.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The Strecker reaction

The proposed Strecker synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine required condensation of formaldehyde with methylamine and [11C]NaCN to generate [11C]α-aminonitrile 3 (Table 1). In preliminary work, we tested the reaction with carrier added NaCN. Cyclotron-produced [11C]CO2 was converted into [11C]HCN using published methods.11 [11C]HCN was trapped on a column composed of platinum wire coated with NaOH to simultaneously purify it (removing excess NH3) and convert into [11C]NaCN.10c [11C]NaCN was then eluted from the column with aqueous NaCN into an aqueous solution of methylamine hydrochloride and formaldehyde. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for five minutes and resulted in 63% radiochemical conversion (RCC12) to α-aminonitrile 3 (Table 1, entry 1). Extending the reaction time to 12 minutes resulted in a negligible increase in RCC to 65% (Table 1, entry 2). We next investigated the effect of temperature on the reaction. Heating at 50 °C for five minutes also had little impact, and 3 was obtained in 68% RCC (Table 1, entry 3). Increasing the reaction temperature to 80 °C gave 81% RCC to 3 (Table 1, entry 4) but, notably, we observed the appearance of several other radiolabeled impurities in the crude reaction mixture that we anticipated could be difficult to separate from 3. Given the minimal effect of varying reaction time on RCC and potential impurity profile at higher temperatures, we elected to move forward with the original conditions (r.t. for 5 min, Table 1, entry 1). We next attempted the reaction using water to elute n.c.a. [11C]NaCN off the platinum wire, and were gratified to observe 49% RCC to [11C]α-aminonitrile 3 (Table 1, entry 5).

Table 1.

Synthesis of [11C]α-Aminonitrile 3 via the Strecker Reaction

graphic file with name nihms937852u2.jpg
Entry MeNH2·HCl/HCHO/NaCN Time (min) Temp (°C) RCC (%)a
1 1:1:1   5 r.t. 63
2 1:1:1 12 r.t. 65
3 1:1:1   5 50 68
4 1:1:1   5 80 81
5 1:1:0 (n.c.a.)   5 r.t. 49
a

RCC: radiochemical conversion.

Hydrolysis of 3 to generate [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 was next investigated. Literature reports typically employ 10 M NaOH at ≥100 °C to convert nitriles into carboxylic acids,10 and employing these standard conditions for five minutes resulted in 59% RCC to 2 (Table 2, entry 1). Attempts to reduce the concentration of NaOH were unsuccessful, as using 5 M NaOH resulted in reduced RCC of 15% (Table 2, entry 2). The hydrolysis of 3 was also sensitive to temperature, and reducing the hydrolysis temperature to 60 °C resulted in a significantly improved RCC of 97% (Table 2, entry 3).

Table 2.

Hydrolysis of 3 to Generate [11C-Carbonyl]sarcosine 2

graphic file with name nihms937852u3.jpg
Entry [NaOH] Time (min) Temp (°C) RCC (%)a
1 10 M 5 100 59
2 5 M 5 100 15
3 10 M 5 60 97
a

RCC: radiochemical conversion.

The long-term goal of this work is clinical evaluation of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine in our prostate cancer patient population. It was therefore necessary to adapt this optimized radiosynthesis for use in a radiochemistry synthesis module to enable a fully automated synthesis compliant with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. To accomplish this, a GE TRACERLab FXM synthesis module was adapted to enable automated Strecker reactions. Briefly, two sets of electronic valves were installed on the module that allowed delivery of [11C]HCN from the cyclotron and automated purification using the platinum wire described above (see Supporting Information for full details of module modifications). The optimized conditions worked out above were then programmed into the module. Following synthesis, the crude reaction mixture was purified by semipreparative HPLC. A range of HPLC conditions were tested (see Supporting Information), and an acetonitrile/sodium dihydrogen phosphate mobile phase in combination with a Luna-NH2 amino-capped silica reverse-phase column proved optimal. The fraction corresponding to [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 was collected and reformulated into an injectable buffer suitable for intravenous injection. Three qualification runs were completed using this automated method, qualifying the site for production of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine for use in clinical PET studies.13 Preliminary imaging in PC-3 human prostate cancer bearing nude mice revealed excellent uptake and better retention of the tracer in the tumor (Figure 2) as well as slower metabolism. Clinical trials in prostate cancer patients have commenced and results will be communicated in due course.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PET images of nude mouse showing uptake of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 in implanted PC-3 tumor (a) and associated tumor and muscle time–radioactivity curves (b)

The general applicability of this automated Strecker reaction was next investigated by applying it to the synthesis of a number of radiolabeled amino acids using different amines and carbonyl compounds (Table 3).14 For example, [11C-carbonyl]methionine 4 was prepared from n.c.a. [11C]NaCN with 3-(methylthio)propanal and ammonium hydroxide (Table 3, entry 1). Analogous conditions using formaldehyde were attempted to synthesize [11C-carbonyl]glycine 5 (Table 3, entry 2), but no product was obtained in this case. Switching the amine to ammonium carbonate, per a previous literature report,10g,j generated [11C-carbonyl]glycine 5 (Table 3, entry 3). We also explored variation of the amine and carbonyl sources used in the reaction. Thus, the synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]-N-phenylglycine 6 demonstrated that anilines were tolerated, although the initial Strecker reaction required heating at 80 °C (Table 3, entry 4). Changing the carbonyl source from an aldehyde to a ketone proved more challenging, however. For example, we wished to synthesize 2-amino-2-methyl-3-phenylpropanoic-1-11C acid from 1-phenylpropan-2-one and ammonia using n.c.a. [11C]NaCN. However, the Strecker reaction resulted in none of the desired [11C]α-aminonitrile 7, even if the reaction was heated (Table 3, entry 5). Since ketones are known to react more slowly than aldehydes in the Strecker reaction,15 this was not entirely unexpected. To address this issue, we repeated the reaction in the presence of one equivalent of carrier NaCN and were pleased to see 4% RCC to the desired [11C]α-aminonitrile 7 (Table 3, entry 6). While the need to add carrier NaCN when using ketones is not ideal, it does offer a means for accessing initial doses of new radiotracers for preliminary evaluation, recognizing that a n.c.a. synthesis would [likely] be needed prior to translation into any clinical imaging trials.

Table 3.

Application of the Method to Other 11C-Labeled Amino Acids

graphic file with name nihms937852u4.jpg
Entry Amine Carbonyl Product RCY (%)a
1 NH4OH graphic file with name nihms937852t1.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t2.jpg 5
2 NH4OH graphic file with name nihms937852t3.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t4.jpg 0
3 (NH4)2CO3 graphic file with name nihms937852t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t6.jpg 14
4 PhNH2 graphic file with name nihms937852t7.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t8.jpg 2
5 NH3·H2O graphic file with name nihms937852t9.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t10.jpg 0
6 NH3·H2O graphic file with name nihms937852t11.jpg graphic file with name nihms937852t12.jpg 4b
a

Isolated and formulated noncorrected radiochemical yields (RCY) based upon [11C]HCN.

b

Radiochemical conversion.

In summary, a no-carrier-added Strecker amino acid synthesis has been developed, which enables the fully automated production of carbon-11-labeled amino acids using modern radiochemistry synthesis platforms. The reaction is tolerant of a range of amines and carbonyl sources, although the use of ketones does require the addition of cyanide carrier. Suitability for production of clinical radiotracer doses has been demonstrated through validation of a method for the synthesis of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine. This production method is being used in our facility to prepare doses of this new radiotracer for use in ongoing clinical trials imaging prostate cancer.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file

Acknowledgments

J.X. and H.Z. thank the State Scholarship Fund by China Scholarship Council for education funding (201507060032) and MRP thanks NIH for financial support (R21CA191052-01). Additional funding from a University of Michigan Department of Radiology seed grant is also acknowledged. Lastly, the authors thank the staff of the University of Michigan PET Center for assistance with mouse imaging experiments.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Supporting information for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1588638.

References and Notes

  • 1.For an overview of PET imaging, see:; (a) Ametamey SM, Honer M, Schubiger PA. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1501. doi: 10.1021/cr0782426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For a general review of PET radiochemistry, see:; (b) Miller PW, Long NJ, Vilar R, Gee AD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:8998. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For an overview of the use of PET imaging in individualized healthcare, see:; (a) Pither R. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2003;3:703. doi: 10.1586/14737159.3.6.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For a review covering the use of PET in drug discovery, see:; (b) Matthews PM, Rabiner EA, Passchier J, Gunn RN. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73:175. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04085.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.For recent reviews on the use of radiolabeled amino acids in PET imaging, see:; (a) Galldiks N, Langen KJQ. J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;59:70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Huang C, McConathy J. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1007. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.113100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jager PL, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, de Vries EG, Langen KJ, Piers DA. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Xing J, Brooks A, Scott P, Piert M, Shao X. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Suppl 2):1068. [Google Scholar]; (b) Shao X, Rrajendiran T, Sherman P, Quesada C, Scott P, Chinnaiyan A, Piert M. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(Suppl 1):1064. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Porter DH, Cook RJ, Wagner C. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1985;243:396. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(85)90516-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Glorieux FH, Scriver CR, Delvin E, Mohyuddin F. J Clin Invest. 1971;50:2313. doi: 10.1172/JCI106729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mossine AV, Brooks AF, Jackson IM, Quesada CA, Sherman P, Cole EL, Donnelly DJ, Scott PJH, Shao X. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27:1382. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For recent reviews of CO2 fixation chemistry, see:; (a) Rotstein BH, Liang SH, Placzek MS, Hooker JM, Gee AD, Dollé F, Wilson AA, Vasdev N. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:4708. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00310a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rotstein BH, Liang SL, Holland JP, Collier TL, Hooker JM, Wilson AA, Vasdev N. Chem Commun. 2013;49:5621. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42236d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Strecker A. Ann Chem Pharm. 1850;75:27. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.For reviews of the Strecker reaction, including modern asymmetric variants, see:; (a) Cai XH, Xie B. ARKIVOC. 2014;(i):205. [Google Scholar]; (b) Khan NH, Kureshy RI, Abdi SHR, Bajaj HC, Sadhukhan A. In: In Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II. Reedijk J, Poeppelmeier K, editors. Vol. 6. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2013. p. 413. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang J, Liu X, Feng X. Chem Rev. 2011;111:6947. doi: 10.1021/cr200057t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Martens J. ChemCatChem. 2010;2:379. [Google Scholar]; (e) Sato K. Kendai Kagaku. 2009;465:16. [Google Scholar]; (f) Shibasaki M, Kanai M, Mita T. Org React. 2008;70:1. [Google Scholar]; (g) Galatsis P. In: Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformations. Li JJ, Corey EJ, editors. Vol. 477 John Wiley and Sons; Hoboken: 2007. [Google Scholar]; (h) Yet L. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Enders D, Shilvock JP. Chem Soc Rev. 2000;29:359. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Cai H, Magner TJ, Muzik O, Wang MW, Chugani DC, Chugani HT. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2014;5:1152. doi: 10.1021/ml500285t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kabalka GW, Nichols TL, Akula M, Longford CPD, Miller L. In: Isotopically Labelled Compounds. Pleiss U, Voges R, editors. Vol. 7. John Wiley and Sons; Chichester: 2007. p. 329. [Google Scholar]; (c) Drandarov K, Schubiger PA, Westera G. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64:1613. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Studenov AR, Szalda DE, Ding YS. Nucl Med Biol. 2003;30:39. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(02)00349-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Prenant C, Theobald A, Siegel T, Joachim J, Weber K, Haberkorn U, Oberdorfer F. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm. 1995;36:579. [Google Scholar]; (f) Adam MJ, Grierson JR, Ruth TJ, Pedersen K, Pate BD. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Johnström P, Stone-Elander S, Ericson K, Mosskin M, Bergström M. Appl Radiat Isot. 1987;38:729. doi: 10.1016/0883-2889(87)90254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Halldin C, Schoeps K-O, Stone-Elander S, Wiesel F-A. Eur J Nucl Med. 1987;13:288. doi: 10.1007/BF00256552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Halldin C, Långström B. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm. 1985;22:631. [Google Scholar]; (j) Schmall B, Conti PS, Bigler RE, Zanzonico PB, Dahl JR, Sundoro-Wu BM, Jacobsen JK, Lee R. Int J Nucl Med Biol. 1984;11:209. doi: 10.1016/0047-0740(84)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Barrio JR, Keen RE, Ropchan JR, MacDonald NS, Baumgartner FJ, Padgett HC, Phelps ME. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Zalutsky MR, Wu J, Harper PV, Wickland T. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1981;32:182. [Google Scholar]; (m) Hübner KF, Andrews GA, Buonocore E, Hayes RL, Washburn LC, Collmann IR, Gibbs WD. J Nucl Med. 1979;20:507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Hayes RL, Washburn LC, Wieland BW, Sun TT, Anon JB, Butler TA, Callahan AP. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1978;29:186. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shao X, Rodnick ME, Brooks AF, Scott PJH. In: Radiochemical Syntheses, Further Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography and New Strategies for Their Production. Scott PJH, editor. Vol. 2. Vol. 233 John Wiley and Sons; Hoboken: 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Radiochemical conversion was determined by HPLC; %RCC = (area of product radioactivity peak/total area of all radioactive peaks) × 100.
  • 13.Automated Synthesis of [11C-Carbonyl]sarcosine 2 Methylamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg in 50 μL H2O) and 37% formaldehyde (0.56 μL in 50 μL H2O) were added to the reaction vessel of a TRACERLab FXm synthesis module. [11C]NaCN (ca. 900 mCi) was delivered to the reaction vessel from the PETTrace cyclotron, and the reaction was stirred for 5 min at r.t. 10 M NaOH (250 μL) was then added to the reaction vessel and was heated to 60 °C for 5 min to perform the hydrolysis. The crude reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with HPLC mobile phase (0.6 mL), and purified by semipreparative HPLC (column: Phenomenex Luna NH2 250 × 10 mm; mobile phase: 10 mM NaH2PO4 in 60% MeCN, pH 5.6; flow rate: 4 mL/min; tR = 10 min). The fraction corresponding to [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine was collected into 60 mL of Milli-Q water containing 1 M NaOH (0.2 mL), and the resulting solution was passed through a SAX cartridge to trap the radiotracer. The cartridge was washed with sterile water for injection, USP (SWI) and then [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine and eluted with 2 M NaCl (0.5 mL) into a product collection vial precharged with sterile water (4.3 mL) and sodium phosphates, USP (0.2 mL). The SAX cartridge was rinsed with additional SWI (5 mL) to give a final dose of 10 mL. This dose was passed through a 0.22 μm sterile filter into a sterile dose vial and submitted for QC testing (see Supporting Information for details of QC methods). The yield of [11C-carbonyl]sarcosine 2 was 30±12 mCi (n = 3), corresponding to 1% isolated and formulated end-of-synthesis radiochemical yield (RCY) based on [11C]CO2, or 3% based on [11C]HCN). The product was also obtained in high radiochemical purity (RCP ≥90%) and specific activity (SA ≥1500 Ci/mmol using the 0.3 μg/mL HPLC limit-of-detection for sarcosine).
  • 14.General Procedure (Table 3, Entries 1–4) ■■details differ from table 3■■The carbonyl compound (1 equiv) and amine (1–3 equiv) in water and/or EtOH were added to the reaction vessel of a TRACERLab FXm synthesis module. [11C]NaCN (ca. 100–800 mCi) in H2O (200–250 μL) was added, and reaction was stirred for 5–7 ■■5?■■ min at r.t. to 100■■80?■■ °C. After this time, 10 M NaOH (250–350 μL) was added, and the reaction mixture was heated at 60– 100■■80?■■ °C for 5–7■■5?■■ min. The reaction was cooled, diluted, and purified by semipreparative HPLC to yield [11C-carbonyl] methionine 4 (RCY = 5%; RCP >90%; SA = 1256 Ci/mmol), [11C-carbonyl]glycine 5 (RCY = 14%; RCP >95%; SA > 1500 Ci/mmol), or [11C-carbonyl]-N-phenylglycine 6 (RCY = 2%; RCP >99%; SA = 15453 Ci/mmol).
  • 15.Baeza A, Nájera C, Sansano JM. Synthesis. 2007:1230. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file

RESOURCES