Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2018 Feb 8;9:577. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03025-1

Methylation profiling identifies two subclasses of squamous cell carcinoma related to distinct cells of origin

Manuel Rodríguez-Paredes 1, Felix Bormann 1, Günter Raddatz 1, Julian Gutekunst 1, Carlota Lucena-Porcel 2,3, Florian Köhler 1, Elisabeth Wurzer 4, Katrin Schmidt 4, Stefan Gallinat 4, Horst Wenck 4, Joachim Röwert-Huber 5, Evgeniya Denisova 6, Lars Feuerbach 6, Jeongbin Park 7, Benedikt Brors 6,8,9, Esther Herpel 2,3, Ingo Nindl 5, Thomas G Hofmann 1, Marc Winnefeld 4, Frank Lyko 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5805678  PMID: 29422656

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin cancer and usually progresses from a UV-induced precancerous lesion termed actinic keratosis (AK). Despite various efforts to characterize these lesions molecularly, the etiology of AK and its progression to cSCC remain partially understood. Here, we use Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips to interrogate the DNA methylation status in healthy, AK and cSCC epidermis samples. Importantly, we show that AK methylation patterns already display classical features of cancer methylomes and are highly similar to cSCC profiles. Further analysis identifies typical features of stem cell methylomes, such as reduced DNA methylation age, non-CpG methylation, and stem cell-related keratin and enhancer methylation patterns. Interestingly, this signature is detected only in half of the samples, while the other half shows patterns more closely related to healthy epidermis. These findings suggest the existence of two subclasses of AK and cSCC emerging from distinct keratinocyte differentiation stages.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a skin cancer that normally progresses from UV-induced actinic keratosis (AK). Here, the authors investigate the epigenomics of cSCC and highlight two distinct subclasses of AK and cSCC originating from distinct keratinocyte differentiation stages.

Introduction

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a nonmelanoma skin cancer type that originates from epidermal keratinocytes and represents about 20% of all skin cancers, with up to 700 000 new cases annually diagnosed in the USA1. Although usually treated effectively by surgery and/or radiotherapy, the percentage of cSCC tumors that recur or metastasize within 5 years is 8% and 5%, respectively1. Chronic sun damage is known to be the main cause of cSCC, which preferably arises on highly exposed areas such as face and neck, from a precancerous lesion termed actinic keratosis (AK)2. AK is defined as an ultraviolet light (UV)-induced keratinocytic dysplasia with abnormal cells3. Although most AKs do not progress to cSCC and many regress spontaneously, the annual risk of progression is estimated at 0.025–20% per individual lesion4. The precise causes of the AK to cSCC transition still remain obscure. It has been shown that cSCC displays a higher mutational load than AK5. However, AK samples already harbor mutations in the same genes that are found mutated in metastatic and aggressive cSCC, such as TP53, NOTCH1-2, FAT1, or MLL25. Other typical cancer-associated genes that are known to be likewise mutated in both entities are CDKN2A, RAS, EGFR, or MYC6–10. Molecular studies using array-based expression profiling have been largely inconclusive11–15. However, a recent study that used RNA-seq to analyze and compare human samples with an UV-irradiated hairless mouse model, identified distinct transcriptional networks driving the initial emergence of AK from healthy epidermis and the transition from AK to cSCC5.

DNA methylation is a covalent epigenetic modification of cytosines within CpG dinucleotides16,17. The modification is established and maintained by a set of specific enzymes called DNA methyltransferases and regulates cellular identity through the modulation of gene expression16,17. Healthy cells are characterized by the absence of DNA methylation at CpG islands, short CpG-rich regions present in ~60% of human promoters, and the extensive methylation of gene bodies and repetitive regions18. The deregulation of the normal methylome is a major hallmark of human cancers19 and frequently characterized by global hypomethylation of lamina-associated domains (LAD) as well as widespread CpG island promoter hypermethylation19,20. Importantly, altered DNA methylation patterns emerge early in tumorigenesis21, and can be used as biomarkers for tumor detection, diagnosis and prognosis22,23.

Our current knowledge about epigenetic changes associated with cSCC is very limited and mostly comprises a moderate number of cancer-associated genes that become silenced by CpG island promoter hypermethylation. Examples include CDKN2A, CDH1, DAPK1, or MGMT24,25. In addition, a recent study suggested that UV-irradiation through chronic sun exposure gives rise to large hypomethylated blocks in healthy epidermis, and that these blocks are conserved in cSCC26. Finally, with respect to the transition between AK and cSCC, it has been suggested that CDH1 promoter hypermethylation might increase from normal skin to AK and cSCC27, and that the silencing of miR-204 might play a role in the progression from AK to cSCC28.

Here, we investigate DNA methylation changes in the progression from healthy epidermis to AK and cSCC using Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips, which contain about 850,000 CpG probes. Our results provide the most comprehensive epigenomic analysis of cSCC development to date and suggest the existence of two distinct subclasses that reflect different cell-of-origin differentiation stages.

Results

AK and cSCC show similar aberrant methylation patterns

Epigenetic modification patterns show a considerable degree of cell-type specificity, which represents a major confounding factor for the interpretation of epigenetic data. For the analysis of human AK and cSCC methylomes, we therefore placed a particular emphasis on the cell-type purity of our samples. Consequently, we separated the epidermal from the dermal parts of punch biopsies and exclusively included samples where a sufficiently large area of the epidermal layer could be dissected in order to isolate at least 500 ng of genomic DNA. In addition, all biopsies were taken from the center of the lesions to ensure the histopathological distinction of AK and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (see Methods for details). Altogether, we analyzed 12 normal epidermis samples, 16 AK epidermis samples, and 18 cSCC epidermis samples using Infinium 850k methylation arrays (Supplementary Table 1). The resulting data sets were quality-assessed, functionally normalized, filtered for potentially confounding probes (those located in sex chromosomes, SNP-containing, and self-hybridizing), and subsequently analyzed using Minfi29.

Principal component analysis (PCA) performed on all 850k probes clearly separated the normal epidermis from AK and cSCC samples, but also indicated highly overlapping patterns between AK and cSCC (Fig. 1a). Moreover, while normal epidermis samples grouped very homogeneously, AK and cSCC distributed more heterogeneously. Pairwise comparisons of the methylation patterns from the three sample groups using Minfi revealed a high number (372,213) of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05, F-test) differentially methylated probes between AK and normal epidermis (Fig. 1b). A similarly high number (310,102) of differentially methylated probes was detected when cSCC and normal samples were compared (Fig. 1b). However, in agreement with our PCA, no significantly differentially methylated probes were detected between AK and cSCC (Fig. 1c). These findings establish pronounced methylation differences between healthy and diseased (AK, cSCC) epidermis samples and also suggest substantial epigenetic similarities between the precancerous lesions and the tumor samples.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Actinic keratosis (AK) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) show similar aberrant methylation patterns. a Principal component analysis of 12 healthy, 16 AK, and 18 cSCC epidermis samples using all 850k CpG probes. b Scatter plots comparing the epidermis methylomes of healthy and AK samples (left panel), and healthy and cSCC samples (right panel). Differentially (P < 0.05, F-test) methylated probes are shown in blue. c Scatter plot comparing the epidermis methylomes of AK and cSCC samples. No significantly (P < 0.05, F-test) differentially methylated probes were detected

AK and cSCC methylomes show cancer-specific features

Cancer methylomes are often characterized by specific features, such as hypomethylated lamina-associated domains (LADs) and hypermethylated CpG islands19,20. Furthermore, hypomethylated LADs have also been described as a prominent feature of cSCC26. We therefore compared the methylation status of different epigenomic substructures such as CpG islands, shelves, shores, and open sea regions in our data sets. The results showed robust hypomethylation of open sea probes as well as hypermethylation of CpG islands and their shores in both AK and cSCC samples. (Fig. 2a). Similarly, the fraction of probes changing their methylation in the different epigenomic substructures was also very similar between normal epidermis and AK or cSCC (Fig. 2b). Finally, we used published data sets30 to define the association of the 850k probeset with LADs. This revealed that LAD probes were significantly hypomethylated in AK and in cSCC (Fig. 2c). Our results thus suggest that the premalignant AK samples already display key features of cancer methylomes and that these features are conserved in cSCC.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

AK and cSCC methylomes show cancer-specific features. a Methylation status of the different epigenomic substructures in the epidermis of AK (left) and cSCC (right) patients compared to healthy controls. The box plots indicate highly significant (P ≤ 9.1E−77, two-sided t-test) hypermethylation of the CpG islands and hypomethylation of the Open Sea probes in both AK and cSCC samples. b Fractions of hyper and hypomethylated CpGs in AK and cSCC epidermis, within different epigenomic substructures and in comparison to healthy skin. c Probes within lamina-associated domains (LADs) are significantly (P ≤ 3.4E−288, two-sided t-test) hypomethylated in AK and cSCC when compared to healthy epidermis

AK and cSCC display typical stem cell methylation features

DNA methylation can be used to predict the chronological age of a given human tissue with high accuracy31. When we applied the age predictor to our samples, we observed a methylation age for the AK and cSCC samples that was clearly below the chronological age of the respective patients (Fig. 3a). This effect is reminiscent of the reduced methylation age observed for stem cells31. Another key feature of stem cells is the presence of DNA methylation marks outside of the canonical CpG context (non-CpG methylation)32,33. Indeed, our analysis revealed significantly (P < 0.05, F-test) increased non-CpG methylation levels, both in AK and in SCC samples (Fig. 3b). Non-CpG methylation has been closely associated with the DNMT3B DNA methyltransferase, which also represents an important epidermal stem cell gene34. Consistent with our methylation data, we observed a significant increase of DNMT3B expression in AK and cSCC samples when compared to healthy controls (Fig. 3c). Together, these results suggest that DNA methylation patterns of AK and cSCC show key features of stem cell methylomes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

AK and cSCC display typical features of stem cell methylomes. a Mean difference between chronological and methylation-based biological age for healthy, AK, and cSCC samples. b Box plots indicating the average methylation levels of the 210 (left panel) and 263 (right panel) differentially (P < 0.05, F-test) methylated non-CpG probes in AK and cSCC. c The DNA methyltransferase DNMT3B gene is significantly upregulated in AK (P < 0.002, two-sided t-test) and cSCC (P < 3.43E−06, two-sided t-test). RNA-seq gene expression data from 7 healthy, 10 AK, and 9 cSCC epidermis samples was obtained from Chitsazzadeh et al.5

Stem cell features of AK and cSCC were also confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis of an independent sample set (11 healthy skin, 11 AK, and 11 cSCC). Specific markers included p63, an epidermal stem cell transcription factor35,36, as well as keratins K5 and K14, that are predominantly expressed in basal keratinocytes37,38. Our results confirmed expression of these three markers in the epidermal basal layers of healthy skin samples (Fig. 4), while atypical keratinocytes from AK and cSCC samples showed broad p63, keratin K5, and keratin K14 expression (Fig. 4). These findings are consistent with previous reports that had shown elevated expression levels of epidermal stem cell markers in AK or cSCC39–42, suggesting that AK and cSCC can arise from mutated epidermal stem cells of the epidermal basal layer43.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

AK and cSCC express epidermal stem cell markers. The figure shows representative hematoxylin and eosin stainings, as well as p63, keratin K5, and keratin K14 immunostainings in epidermis from healthy donors, AK and cSCC patients, respectively. Ectopic expression of the three epidermal stem cell markers was observed in AK and cSCC samples. Scale bars, 200 µm

Keratin gene methylation defines two subclasses of AK/cSCC

Keratin expression patterns correspond to the epithelial cell type and its degree of differentiation44. We therefore analyzed the methylation patterns of the keratin gene clusters on chromosomes 12 and 17 and observed major DNA methylation differences between healthy donors and AK and cSCC patients (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Figure 1). A closer inspection of individual keratin genes confirmed this notion and also indicated the presence of two distinct keratin methylation patterns within the AK and cSCC sample groups (Fig. 5b). Intriguingly, the analysis of TP63 gene methylation provided a similar result (Supplementary Figure 2), suggesting that methylation differences within sample groups may be differentiation-related.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

A specific methylation signature at keratin gene clusters identifies two distinct subclasses of AK/cSCC. a UCSC genome browser tracks showing significant DNA methylation differences (Δβ, P < 0.05, F-test, vertical green lines) at the keratin gene cluster on chromosome 12 for AK (upper part) and cSCC (lower part) in comparison to healthy epidermis. b Specific DNA methylation patterns of the genes encoding keratins K5, K14, K15, and K80 (KRT5, KRT14, KRT15, and KRT80, respectively). Heatmaps show DNA methylation levels (in β values, from blue (= 0) to red (= 1)) of probes (columns) located in the promoter and gene body, for individual healthy, AK, and cSCC samples (rows). Filled and empty circles denote the two distinct subclasses of AK (purple) and cSCC (black), respectively. c Principal component analysis of healthy, AK, and cSCC epidermis samples based on 1364 keratin-associated methylation probes. For comparisons, keratin methylation patterns from 26 additional tumor entities were also included. d Hierarchical clustering of the dataset shown in c. The 26 tumor entities depicted in this graph, and also used in c, are from left to right: testicular germ cell tumors, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, lung squamous carcinoma, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, uterine carcinosarcoma, lung adenocarcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, bladder urothelial carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, rectum adenocarcinoma, skin cutaneous melanoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme, sarcoma, thyroid carcinoma, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, breast invasive carcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma, and mesothelioma

For a more comprehensive and systematic keratin gene methylation pattern analysis, we extracted the methylation data for all 1364 probes that are associated with the 55 keratin genes. This information was also extracted from 7824 cancer data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), representing 26 different tumor entities. In agreement with our initial findings, principal component analysis again distributed the AK and cSCC samples into two groups (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, one group clustered together with the cancer samples, while the other group was closely related to the healthy epidermis samples (Fig. 5c). Similarly, hierarchical clustering of the same samples and tumor entities also separated the AK/cSCC samples into own branches, one closely related to healthy epidermis and the other one related to other epithelial tumor entities such as kidney, thyroid, or breast cancer (Fig. 5d). In conclusion, keratin gene methylation patterns clearly define two distinct subtypes of AK and cSCC that potentially originate from different keratinocyte differentiation stages.

Epidermal differentiation stages define AK/cSCC subclasses

The Infinium MethylationEPIC array provides unique opportunities for the analysis of enhancer methylation states and enhancers have been shown to be a particularly relevant target of DNA methylation32,45. Furthermore, enhancer methylation patterns can be used to define cellular identity46. To determine whether the observed AK/cSCC subtypes could arise from distinct keratinocyte differentiation stages, we classified our AK and cSCC epidermal samples according to the DNA methylation status of 104,477 probes located in the 77,154 enhancers of H1 human embryonic stem cell (ESC) line, as well as 123,257 probes located in the 79,155 enhancers of normal human keratinocytes47,48 (Fig. 6a). Subsequent hierarchical clustering identified the same subclasses of AK and cSCC: one closely related to keratinocytes and the other one related to ESCs (Fig. 6b). These results strongly suggest that the two observed AK/cSCC subclasses develop from two distinct cell types of origin that are related to undifferentiated epidermal stem cells and to more differentiated keratinocytes, respectively.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Enhancer methylation patterns separate AK and cSCC into keratinocyte-like and epidermal stem cell-like subtypes. a Venn diagram displaying the total number of enhancer regions defined for human embryonic stem cells and keratinocytes, respectively47, 48. As expected, both cell types only share about a quarter of their enhancers (b) Hierarchical clustering of AK and cSCC epidermis samples based on the methylation status of the 850k probes contained in ESC (left) and keratinocyte (right) enhancers. Methylation profiles of ESCs epidermis samples were used as reference. Filled and empty circles denote the two distinct subclasses of AK (purple) and cSCC (black), respectively. c Heatmaps showing the methylation profiles of enhancers gained (n = 109, left) and lost (n = 11,825, right) during EpSC differentiation, in AK and cSCC epidermis samples, respectively. Colors represent the normalized average methylation levels of each enhancer region

We further refined our analysis by the integration of reference data sets, using published methylation profiles of epidermal stem cells (EpSC) and differentiated keratinocytes34. Unsupervised clustering of the corresponding enhancer methylation profiles again separated the AK and SCC samples into the two previously described subclasses (Fig. 6c). In addition, our results also identify the EpSC-specific enhancers as a key feature of the EpSC-like subgroup (Fig. 6c). Pathway Analysis of the genes (n = 1188) associated with the hypermethylated EpSC-specific enhancer regions highlighted their role in developmental functions (Supplementary Figure 3). Finally, we also performed whole-exome sequencing of 20 samples (10 AK and 10 cSCC; Supplementary Table 1) to investigate a potential relationship between DNA methylation-based subtypes and genetic mutation patterns. The results showed a higher mutational heterogeneity in the AK samples (Supplementary Figure 4), as described previously5. However, no correlation between genetic mutations and the DNA methylation patterns defining the two subgroups could be found (Supplementary Figure 4). Collectively, these findings confirm the existence of two distinct subclasses of AK and cSCC, which originate from different keratinocyte differentiation stages and are independent of the mutational profile.

Discussion

Altered DNA methylation patterns are considered a classical hallmark of cancer19,49, but their precise significance and functional relevance for tumorigenesis are still not completely understood. We have now generated high-resolution methylation profiles to analyze for the first time the methylomes of cSCC and its precursor lesion, AK, in epidermis samples that were carefully prepared to avoid contamination from surrounding tissue. This focused our analysis on keratinocyte-related methylation patterns and minimized the impact of confounding patterns from other cell types. Our results classify cSCC into two distinct subgroups that are defined by stem cell-like and keratinocyte-like methylation patterns, respectively. Interestingly, the same subclassification could be applied to the AK samples. These findings are consistent with the notion that cSCC develops from AK and that both lesions share common cell types of origin.

Whether AK represents a benign precancerous lesion or malignant tissue is a matter of ongoing debate4. Our observation that AK methylomes display typical cancer-related features, such as CpG island hypermethylation and LAD hypomethylation may indicate a significant malignant potential of AK. This is consistent with previous reports showing that both AK and cSCC share mutations in key genes associated with cancer development and progression5–10. In addition, several published studies failed to identify major expression differences between AK and cSCC5,11–15. This is in agreement with our finding that epigenetic differences in comparison to normal skin are shared between unstratified groups of AK and cSCC samples.

Our detailed analysis of the AK and cSCC methylomes also revealed key features of stem cell methylomes. In particular we observed a lower methylation age and a higher level of non-CpG methylation, both typical characteristics of stem cells31–33. These results, together with the ectopic expression of the epidermal stem cell markers50 p63, keratin K5 and keratin K14, can be interpreted to reflect the development of cSCC from progenitor cells in the epidermal basal layer, as previously proposed43.

Cancer-associated DNA methylation profiles are increasingly interpreted to reflect the epigenetic program of the cancer cell-of-origin51–53. This concept is similar to the use of keratin expression patterns for tumor classification, which is based on the finding that epithelial tumors largely maintain the keratin expression pattern of their cell-of-origin54. Interestingly, our analysis revealed two distinct keratin methylation profiles within our AK/cSCC sample set, one resembling that of the healthy epidermis and the other one resembling that of other tumor entities, which often present a certain degree of dedifferentiation55,56. These results strongly suggested two different cell types of origin for the two observed AK/cSCC subgroups. Our analysis of enhancer methylation patterns further associated these two cell types with epidermal stem cells and more differentiated keratinocytes, respectively. Altogether, our findings support a model (Fig. 7) where AK and cSCC originate from two (or more) differentiation stages of epidermal stem cells. The detailed characterization of these cell types and the analysis of their clinical significance will be important aspects for future studies.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Model describing the emergence of AK/cSCC subtypes from different stages of epidermal differentiation. Mutations giving rise to AK can result in the transformation of distinct epidermal differentiation stages, resulting in two distinct subclasses of AK/cSCC

Methods

Samples

To obtain healthy epidermis samples, suction blisters57 were induced on the forearms of healthy male volunteers. After their removal, suction blister roofs were immediately stored at −80 °C. Suction blistering was approved by the Freiburger Independent Ethics Committee (011/1973) and written, informed patient consents were given from all volunteers. AK and cSCC samples were obtained as punch biopsies (diameter 4 mm) at the Charité University Hospital (Berlin, Germany) from three diagnostic stages of AK and cSCC. Half of the tissue was immersed in liquid nitrogen within 2 min of resection and stored at −70 °C. The other half of each biopsy (excluding normal skin specimens) was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histology. To exclude a misdiagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) as AK, punch biopsies were taken from the center of the lesions. Biopsied tissues were further dissected to allow histopathological analyses of the core of the lesions. AK samples with histopathological features of SCCIS were excluded from further analysis. The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the Charité, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (number Si. 248). An overview of all samples is provided in Supplementary Table 1. The epidermal parts were separated from the dermal parts of the punch biopsies by heat split (56 °C for 2 min) and careful manual dissection. DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA Investigator Kit (Qiagen).

Analysis of Infinium 850k data

DNA methylation profiles were obtained using Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Methylation analysis was performed using the R Bioconductor package Minfi (v1.20.2)29. In short, raw IDAT files were read and preprocessed. Methylation loci (probes) were filtered for high detection p-value (P > 0.01, as provided by Minfi29), location on sex chromosomes, ability to self-hybridize, and potential SNP contamination. Array normalization was carried out using the preprocessFunnorm function, available in Minfi58. Quality control was performed after every preprocessing step. Differentially methylated probes were identified by fitting a linear model followed by statistical analysis using an empirical Bayes method to moderate standard errors. Eventually, differentially methylated probes were filtered by significance threshold (P < 0.05, F-test, after correction for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method). Methylation age was determined by using the DNA methylation calculator (https://dnamage.genetics.ucla.edu/). LAD association of Infinium 850k probes was determined using previously published data sets30.

Gene expression analysis

RNA-seq data were extracted from a published data set5. We plotted the normalized expression counts for healthy, AK, and cSCC samples using R. P-values were calculated by a t-test and corrected for multiple testing (Benjamini–Hochberg method).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis

IHC analysis was performed on 1 µm-thick sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) epidermis from 11 healthy donors, 11 AK, and 11 cSCC patients, respectively. All samples shared the same gender (male) and ethnicity (Caucasian), and were provided and processed by the tissue bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT, Heidelberg, Germany) in accordance with its own regulations and with the approval of the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg. Sections were cut using a HMA 340E Electronic Rotary Microtome (Thermo Scientific), dried and stored at room temperature until their analysis with a BenchMark ULTRA instrument (Ventana Medical Systems). Antigens were retrieved with Protease I (Ventana Medical Systems) for 12 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies and dilutions used to detect the different markers were as follows: p63 (790–4509, Ventana Medical Systems; 0.140 µg mL−1), keratin K5 (790–4554, Ventana Medical Systems; 10.4 µg mL−1) and keratin K14 (760–4805, Ventana Medical Systems; 1–5 µg mL−1). Sections were incubated with the corresponding antibodies at 36 °C for 24 min and detected using the OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems). A NanoZoomer Slide Scanner (Hamamatsu) was used to generate the final images and their analysis was performed with the Aperio ImageScope viewing software (Leica Biosystems, version 12.3.2.8013).

Keratin gene methylation analysis

Keratin gene methylation analyses were based on the 1364 850k probes contained in 55 keratin genes. For comparisons, we also obtained Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip level 3 methylation data from 7824 samples of TCGA, and averaged them for each of the 26 considered cancer types. After extracting the 522 450k CpG probes contained in all keratin genes, the β values corresponding to each gene were also averaged. Finally, PCA and unrooted cluster dendrograms were performed using the R packages FactoMineR and APE, respectively.

Enhancer methylation analysis

ChromHMM segmentations for H1 ESCs and normal human epithelial keratinocytes were downloaded from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) web server (https://genome.ucsc.edu) and enhancer regions were extracted (77,154 and 79,365, respectively). After identifying the 850k CpG probes contained in both enhancer sets (104,477 and 123,257, respectively), the methylation values of those probes contained in each enhancers were averaged for all individual AK and cSCC samples. Methylation data for H1 cells were obtained from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project59, methylation data for keratinocytes was obtained from the healthy epidermis samples. Hierarchical clustering was performed using APE. Locations of enhancers gained and lost during EpSc differentiation were obtained from published data34. We identified the 850k probes contained in these regions (387 and 85,381, respectively) and averaged the methylation values of those contained in each of the enhancers for all our samples. After subtracting the β values of healthy epidermis, the final numbers were used for sample clustering and visualized as heatmaps.

Pathway analysis

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Qiagen) was used to assess the developmental role of the genes (n = 1188) contained in the EpSC-specific enhancer regions found hypermethylated in the EpSC-related AK/cSCC subclass (normalized Δβ value > 0.2).

Whole-exome sequencing

Exome capture was performed using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v5 kit. The capture area comprised 357,999 exons from 21,522 genes (~50 Mb in total). Paired-end 100 bp DNA sequencing reads were subsequently generated on a HiSeq 4000 system (Illumina), achieving an average coverage of 180 × (Supplementary Table 2). Data preprocessing was performed using the One Touch Pipeline (OTP) platform60. Reads were then mapped to the human reference genome build hs37d5 (phase II reference of the 1000 Genomes Project including decoy sequences) using the Burrows-Wheele Aligner (BWA) version 0.7.15 mem function with default parameters (except for invoking -T 0)61,62. Duplicates were marked with Sambamba version 0.6.563. Single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels) were called using an in-house workflow, based on SAMtools/BCFtools 0.1.19 (for SNVs) and Platypus 0.8.1 (for indels)64,65. The annotation was performed with ANNOVAR (version 2016Feb01)66. To remove artifact SNVs/indels we calculated a ‘confidence score’ for each mutation. This score was first defined as 10, and then deducted if the mutation overlapped with repeats or DUKE excluded regions, DAC blacklisted regions, self-chain regions, or segmental duplication records67,68. For indels, the filters from Platypus were additionally considered to calculate the confidence score, which was deducted if alleleBias, badReads, MQ, SC, GOF, QD, or strandBias was set. Thus, mutations were excluded from the analysis if this confidence score was too low (<8), if sequencing depth was too high or too low, or if the reads were not properly mapped. Common polymorphisms that could be found in mutation databases were further filtered out: variants were excluded if present in dbSNP 147 with ‘COMMON = 1’ tag (although rescued if they had the corresponding OMIM record), the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database 0.3.1 (>0.1%)69, the Exome Variant Server (EVS) ESP6500SI-V2 (>1%), and in our in-house control data set (>2%, among 280 controls). Based on ANNOVAR annotations, only the variants in coding regions were selected for the analysis. The oncoprint plot was finally generated using the ComplexHeatmap R package70.

Data availability

Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip data are available from the ArrayExpress database under the accession number E-MTAB-5738. Whole-exome sequencing data has been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), which is hosted by the EBI and the CRG, under accession number EGAS00001002670.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (417.6KB, pdf)
Peer Review File (142.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank the DKFZ Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility for Infinium 850k and whole-exome sequencing services and the Data Management Group (DMG) for their support in the whole-exome sequencing data analysis. This work was supported by the BMBF-funded German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure de.NBI (grant numbers. 031A537A, 031A537C, and 031L0101A). We thank Gregor Warsow for his assistance in preparing the Oncoprint plot and Barbara Hutter for advice.

Author contributions

M.R.-P., F.B., G.R. and J.G. analyzed the data. C.L.-P. performed the immunohistochemistry experiments. F.K. and E.W. contributed to the data analysis. E.D., L.F., J.P. and B.B. carried out whole-exome sequencing data analysis. K.S. prepared epidermis samples. S.G., H.W., J.R.-H., E.H. and I.N. organized the collection of samples. M.W. and F.L. conceived the study. M.R.-P. and F.L. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

E.W., K.S., S.G., H.W. and M.W. are employees of Beiersdorf AG. F.L. has received consultation fees from Beiersdorf AG.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-03025-1.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Alam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:975–983. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103293441306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mittelbronn MA, Mullins DL, Ramos-Caro FA, Flowers FP. Frequency of pre-existing actinic keratosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Dermatol. 1998;37:677–681. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Glogau RG. The risk of progression to invasive disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2000;42:23–24. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Siegel JA, Korgavkar K, Weinstock MA. Current perspective on actinic keratosis: a review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016;177:350–358. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chitsazzadeh V, et al. Cross-species identification of genomic drivers of squamous cell carcinoma development across preneoplastic intermediates. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12601. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pacifico A, et al. Loss of CDKN2A and p14ARF expression occurs frequently in human nonmelanoma skin cancers. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008;158:291–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanellou P, et al. Genomic instability, mutations and expression analysis of the tumour suppressor genes p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a and p53 in actinic keratosis. Cancer Lett. 2008;264:145–161. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Toll A, et al. MYC gene numerical aberrations in actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009;161:1112–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toll A, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene numerical aberrations are frequent events in actinic keratoses and invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Exp. Dermatol. 2010;19:151–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zaravinos A, Kanellou P, Spandidos DA. Viral DNA detection and RAS mutations in actinic keratosis and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010;162:325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nindl I, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by microarray expression profiling. Mol. Cancer. 2006;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Padilla RS, Sebastian S, Jiang Z, Nindl I, Larson R. Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression. Arch. Dermatol. 2010;146:288–293. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ra SH, Li X, Binder S. Author index to abstracts. Mod. Pathol. 2011;24:463A–489A. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hameetman L, et al. Molecular profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas and actinic keratoses from organ transplant recipients. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lambert SR, et al. Key differences identified between actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptome profiling. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:520–529. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baubec T, Schübeler D. Genomic patterns and context specific interpretation of DNA methylation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2014;25:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:204–220. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rodríguez-Paredes M, Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat. Med. 2011;17:330–339. doi: 10.1038/nm.2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baylin SB, Jones PA. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome — biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:726–734. doi: 10.1038/nrc3130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berman BP, et al. Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina-associated domains. Nat. Genet. 2011;44:40–46. doi: 10.1038/ng.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Easwaran H, Tsai HC, Baylin SB. Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol. Cell. 2014;54:716–727. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stirzaker C, Taberlay PC, Statham AL, Clark SJ. Mining cancer methylomes: prospects and challenges. Trends Genet. 2014;30:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Costa-Pinheiro P, Montezuma D, Henrique R, Jerónimo C. Diagnostic and prognostic epigenetic biomarkers in cancer. Epigenomics. 2015;7:1003–1015. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Murao K, Kubo Y, Ohtani N, Hara E, Arase S. Epigenetic abnormalities in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas: frequent inactivation of the RB1/p16 and p53 pathways. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006;155:999–1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07487.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Sawalha AH, Lu Q. Aberrant DNA methylation in skin diseases. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2009;54:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vandiver AR, et al. Age and sun exposure-related widespread genomic blocks of hypomethylation in nonmalignant skin. Genome Biol. 2015;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0644-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chiles MC, Ai L, Zuo C, Fan CY, Smoller BR. E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation in preneoplastic and neoplastic skin lesions. Mod. Pathol. 2003;16:1014–1018. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000089779.35435.9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Toll A, et al. MiR-204 silencing in intraepithelial to invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma progression. Mol. Cancer. 2016;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0537-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aryee MJ, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1363–1369. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guelen L, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature. 2008;453:948–951. doi: 10.1038/nature06947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lister R, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462:315–322. doi: 10.1038/nature08514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schultz MD, et al. Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature. 2015;523:212–216. doi: 10.1038/nature14465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rinaldi L, et al. Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b associate with enhancers to regulate human epidermal stem cell homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:491–501. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Calabrò V, et al. Inhibition of p63 transcriptional activity by p14ARF: functional and physical link between human ARF tumor suppressor and a member of the p53 family. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:8529–8540. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.19.8529-8540.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koster MI, Kim S, Mills AA, DeMayo FJ, Roop DR. p63 is the molecular switch for initiation of an epithelial stratification program. Genes Dev. 2004;18:126–131. doi: 10.1101/gad.1165104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Knöbel M, O’Toole EA, Smith FJD. Keratins and skin disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;360:583–589. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-2105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Loschke F, Seltmann K, Bouameur JE, Magin TM. Regulation of keratin network organization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015;32:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wrone DA, Yoo S, Chipps LK, Moy RL. The expression of p63 in actinic keratoses, seborrheic keratosis, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Dermatol. Surg. 2004;30:1299–1302. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park HR, et al. Expression profiles of p63, p53, survivin, and hTERT in skin tumors. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2004;31:544–549. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2004.00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sakiz D, Turkmenoglu TT, Kabukcuoglu F. The expression of p63 and p53 in keratoacanthoma and intraepidermal and invasive neoplasms of the skin. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2009;205:589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Choi KH, Kim GM, Kim SY. The keratin-14 expression in actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma: is this a prognostic factor for tumor progression? Cancer Res. Treat. 2010;42:107. doi: 10.4143/crt.2010.42.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Boehnke K, Falkowska-Hansen B, Stark HJ, Boukamp P. Stem cells of the human epidermis and their niche: composition and function in epidermal regeneration and carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1247–1258. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moll R, Divo M, Langbein L. The human keratins: biology and pathology. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008;129:705–733. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0435-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xie W, et al. Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2013;153:1134–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wiench M, et al. DNA methylation status predicts cell type-specific enhancer activity. EMBO J. 2011;30:3028–3039. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ernst J, Kellis M. Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:817–825. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ernst J, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature. 2011;473:43–49. doi: 10.1038/nature09906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Esteller M. Epigenetics in Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1148–1159. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saldanha SN, Royston KJ, Udayakumar N. Epigenetic regulation of epidermal stem cell biomarkers and their role in wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;17:16. doi: 10.3390/ijms17010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oakes CC, et al. DNA methylation dynamics during B cell maturation underlie a continuum of disease phenotypes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:253–264. doi: 10.1038/ng.3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pajtler KW, et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:728–743. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moran S, et al. Epigenetic profiling to classify cancer of unknown primary: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1386–1395. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30297-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Karantza V. Keratins in health and cancer: more than mere epithelial cell markers. Oncogene. 2011;30:127–138. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells: current status and evolving complexities. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:717–728. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ben-Porath I, et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:499–507. doi: 10.1038/ng.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Südel KM, et al. Tight control of matrix metalloproteinase-1 activity in human skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2003;78:355–360. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078&#x0003c;0355:TCOMMA&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fortin JP, et al. Functional normalization of 450k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies. Genome Biol. 2014;15:503. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0503-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kundaje A, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518:317–330. doi: 10.1038/nature14248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Reisinger E, et al. OTP: An automatized system for managing and processing NGS data. J. Biotechnol. 2017;261:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491:56–65. doi: 10.1038/nature11632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997 (2013).
  • 63.Tarasov A, Vilella AJ, Cuppen E, Nijman IJ, Prins P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2032–2034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rimmer A, et al. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:912–918. doi: 10.1038/ng.3036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dunham I, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jones DTW, et al. Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:927–932. doi: 10.1038/ng.2682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lek M, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–291. doi: 10.1038/nature19057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2847–2849. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (417.6KB, pdf)
Peer Review File (142.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip data are available from the ArrayExpress database under the accession number E-MTAB-5738. Whole-exome sequencing data has been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), which is hosted by the EBI and the CRG, under accession number EGAS00001002670.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES