Skip to main content
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology logoLink to International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology
. 2015 Dec 18;29(2):241–251. doi: 10.1177/0394632015617064

CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory cells, Th1 (CCR5, IL-2, IFN-γ) and Th2 (CCR4, IL-4, Il-13) type chemokine receptors and intracellular cytokines in children with common variable immunodeficiency

Necil Kutukculer 1, Elif Azarsiz 1,, Guzide Aksu 1, Neslihan Edeer Karaca 1
PMCID: PMC5806726  PMID: 26684629

Abstract

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous group of primary antibody deficiencies characterized by decreased serum immunoglobulin G along with a decrease in serum IgA and/or IgM, defective specific antibody production, and recurrent bacterial infections. Abnormal lymphocyte trafficking, dysregulated cellular responses to chemokines, and uncontrolled T cell polarization may be involved in the pathogenesis and may help to understand the clinical complications. We evaluated T helper cell subsets (chemokine receptors CCR4, CCR5, and CCR7), expressions on T lymphocytes, intracellular cytokines – IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, IFN- γ-on CD4+ T cells, and expression of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells of 20 CVID patients and 26 healthy controls. Autoimmune clinical findings and other complications were also determined. Percentages and absolute numbers of CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ cells did not show any significant difference between CVID cases and healthy controls nor between severe and moderate disease patients. The only significant difference regarding Th1 and Th2 type intracellular cytokines was the decreased absolute numbers of CD3+CD4+IL4+ cells in CVID cases. There were some findings about T helper cell type dominance in CVID patients such as positive correlation between hepatomegaly and high IL-2 and IFN-γ in CD3+CD4+ cells and very high expression of CCR5 (Th1) on CD3+CD4+ cells in patients with granuloma. Th1 (CCR5) and Th2 (CCR4) type chemokine receptors did not show any dominance in CVID cases. However, frequencies of CCR7 expressing CD3+ T cells, CD3+CD4+ T helper cells and CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells were significantly lower in severe CVID patients. In addition, presence of autoimmune clinical findings was negatively correlated with CCR7+ cells. As CCR7 is a key mediator balancing immunity and tolerance in the immune system, the abnormality of this mediator may contribute to the profound immune dysregulation seen in CVID. In addition, Th1 cells seem to be more involved in the disease pathogenesis than Th2 cells.

Keywords: CVID, intracellular cytokines, Th1/Th2 chemokine receptors, Treg cells

Introduction

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous group of primary antibody deficiencies characterized by decreased serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G along with a decrease in serum IgA and/or IgM, defective specific antibody production, and recurrent bacterial infections.1 Most patients present with recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Various autoimmune conditions, particularly autoimmune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia, are common in CVID, occurring in approximately 20% of patients.24 Underlying causes of autoimmunity in CVID are increased tendency towards loss of tolerance and immune dysregulation.24 CVID patients are also prone to develop non-infectious manifestations such as gastrointestinal, lymphoproliferative, and granulomatous complications.13 These complications are more likely to occur in CVID patients with other autoimmune phenomena.4

The CD4+ T cells are central regulators of both humoral and cellular immune responses. The subsets of CD4+ T cells, T-helper 1 (Th1), Th2, and regulatory T cells are specialized in regulating different aspects of immunity. Immune balance controlled by Th1 and Th2 cells is critical for the protection of host autoimmune diseases.5 Th1 cells commonly secrete IL-2 and IFN-γ, activate macrophages, provide helper function for IgM, IgG, and IgA synthesis, and elicit delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. In contrast, Th2 cells develop in response to allergens or helminth antigens, produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, encourage production of all immunoglobulin classes, including IgE, and suppress cell-mediated immunity.6,7 The CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ T regulatory cells (Treg cells) maintain peripheral tolerance by actively blocking immune responses, inflammation, and tissue destruction by suppressing the functions of an array of cell types including classical CD4+ helper T cells, B-cell antibody production and affinity maturation, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte granule release, and antigen presenting cell function.8,9

Chemokines (chemotactic cytokines) direct lymphocyte trafficking to secondary lymphoid tissues, and facilitate appropriate cellular and humoral interactions which have important implications for disorders of the immune system.10 On activation, effector lymphocytes upregulate a different set of chemokine receptors on their cell surface, which increase the chemotactic sensitivity of lymphocytes to chemokines. The expression profile of chemokines in a particular inflammation site determines the type of infiltrating leukocytes. The chemokine receptor CCR7 (the receptor for EBV-induced gene 1 ligand [EBI1]) has previously been shown to contribute to the formation of germinal centers and antibody production.11 Naive T cells express CXCR4 and CCR7. After activation, T cells can be polarized to either Th1 or Th2 type cells. Chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR3 are preferentially expressed in Th1 cells over Th2 cells. More CCR3, CCR4 (the receptor for TARC [thymus and activation-regulated chemokine]), and CCR8 are expressed in Th2 cells than Th1 cells.1013

Abnormal lymphocyte trafficking, dysregulated cellular responses to chemokines, and uncontrolled T cell polarization may be involved in the pathogenesis of primary immunodeficiency disorders and may help to understand the clinical complications of these patients. We investigated T helper cell subset profiles of CVID patients and compared these with a group of healthy controls, and tried to find correlations between these levels and clinical complications such as autoimmune diseases or granulomatous lesion formation.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients admitted to Ege University Pediatric Immunology Department were recruited in the study. All patients fulfilled criteria for CVID based on the European Society for Immunodeficiencies / Pan- American Group for Immunodeficiency (ESID/ PAGID) definition which stipulates a marked decrease of IgG (of at least two standard deviations [SDs] below the mean for age) and reduced serum IgA and/ or IgM, specific antibody deficiency, age older than 2 years, and exclusion of other causes of hypogammaglobulinemia.1 Written informed consent was obtained from parents. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Clinical information was obtained for each CVID patient from their medical records. Information was collected on gender, date of birth, age at onset of symptoms, age at diagnosis, familial history for primary immunodeficiencies, consanguinity, history of pneumonias, chronic lung disease, bronchiectasis, pulmonary granulomata or lymphoid interstitial pneumonia, severe infections, autoimmune diseases (autoimmune hemolytic anemia [AIHA], autoimmune thrombocytopenia [ITP], rheumatoid arthritis, pernicious anemia), granulomatous infiltration at any localization, presence of splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, malignancy, gluten-like enteropathy, chronic giardiasis, osteoporosis, and splenectomy.

Patients were examined as a whole study group and also they were divided into two subgroups due to previously published disease severity criteria for CVID.14,15 The severe disease (SD) group included patients who had splenomegaly and/or granulomatous diseases and/or bronchiectasis and/or lower baseline IgG values (lower than 270 mg/dl at admission) (n = 6). The oderate disease (MD) group were CVID patients diagnosed as having ESID/ PAGID criteria but did not fulfill the severe disease group inclusion criteria (n = 14).

All patients were receiving their regular IVIG replacement therapy and none of them had an infectious episode during data analysis.

Whole blood count assay

Whole blood count; leukocyte counts, absolute neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were performed with hemocounter (Cell- Dyn 3700, Abbott Diagnostics, USA).

Serum immunoglobulin assay

The quantifications of serum IgG, IgM, and IgA had been performed by nephelometric method with Dade Behring BNII Nephelometer Analyzer and commercially available kits by Dade Behring (Germany) and were investigated in comparison to Turkish age-related normal levels.16

Flow cytometric analyses

All flow cytometric analyses were made by using FacsCalibur (Becton Dickinson, USA). The instrument has two lasers for excitation; 488 nm (primary) can detect scattered light in the form of forward scattered light FSC (for cell size), side scattered light SSC (for cell complexity/granularity), FL-1 (FITC), FL-2 (PE), FL-3 (PERCP, PERCPCY5.5), and 635 nm (secondary) can detect FL-4 (APC). Emission filters for FITC, PE, PERCP, and APC are as 530/30, 585/42, 670LP, and 661/16, respectively. The flow cytometric data were given in the text according to standardized publishing rules.1719

Lymphocyte subsets assay

The percentages and absolute counts of lymphocyte subsets (CD3+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD3+CD4+ T helper cells, CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells, CD3+HLA-DR+ activated T cells, CD3-CD16+CD56+ natural killer cells, CD19+CD27+ memory B cells, CD19+CD27+IgDIgM switched memory B cells) were investigated by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, USA) using peripheral blood anti-coagulated with EDTA. CD3/CD4/CD8/CD45, CD3/CD19/CD16/56/CD45, CD3/HLA DR multicolor antibody reagents, and anti-CD27 FITC (clone M-T271), anti-IgD PE (clone IAG2), and anti-IgM PE (clone G20-127) were all purchased from BD Biosciences. Gating strategy for defining the memory and switched memory B cells was as follows: CD19+ B lymphocytes were gated on their forward and side scatters. All cell subpopulations were acquired using Cell Quest-Pro software (BD Biosciences, Belgium) and compensations were made.

Chemokine receptor (CCR4, CCR5, and CCR7) expressions on T lymphocytes

The T cell compartments were analyzed with four-color FACSCalibur flow cytometry (Becton-Dickinson, USA) using peripheral blood anti-coagulated with heparin. The chemokines studied on lymphocytes were as follows; CCR4 for Th2, CCR5 for Th1, and CCR7 for naive T cells. Cells were stained with anti-CD3-APC (clone SK7), anti-CD4-PerCP (clone SK3), anti-CD194-PE (CCR4) (clone 1g1), anti-CD195-FITC (CCR5) (clone 2D7/CCR5), and anti-CD197-PE (CCR7) (clone JD12). All monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Becton-Dickinson, USA. Gating strategy for defining the chemokine receptors expressions was as follows: CD3+ T lymphocytes were gated based on their forward and side scatters. Compensations were made if needed and the percentages of the chemokines were assessed from CD3+CD4+ lymphocytes using Cell-Quest software (Becton Dickinson, USA).

Intracellular cytokine expressions (IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, IFN- γ) on CD4+ T cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation (Biochrome). These PBMC were stained for surface and intracellular markers. IL-2 (PE, clone5344-111) and IFN-γ (PE, clone 25723.11) were the intracellular Th1 cytokines, IL-4 (PE, clone 3010.211) and IL-13 (PE, clone JES10-SA2) were the intracellular Th2 cytokines studied on lymphocytes. All monoclonal antibodies were derived from Becton Dickinson, USA. Lymphocytes were activated by phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) + ionomycine (I) (Sigma Aldrich, USA) permeabilizing solution (Becton Dickinson, Belgium), and brefeldin-A (BFA, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and anti-CD69 PE (clone L78) monoclonal antibody were used in accordance with manufacturer’s recommended protocol for the detection of intracellular cytokines in activated lymphocytes. Gating strategy for defining the intracellular cytokine expressions in patients with altered percentages compared to representative healthy controls was as follows: lymphocytes were gated based on their forward and side scatters. The percentages of the IL-2 and IFN-γ in CD4+ T cells gate were assessed to determine intracellular Th1 type cytokine expression. The percentages of Th2 type cytokine expressions (IL-4 and IL-13) were determined in CD4+ T cells, also. All samples were analyzed by flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, Becton-Dickinson, USA) using Cell-Quest software (Becton-Dickinson, USA) and also compensation was made if it was needed. The percentages of intracellular cytokines of CD4+ T lymphocytes obtained before and after activation were compared for both study and control groups (Table 1) and all intracellular cytokine detections were found to be significantly increased, showing that lymphocytes were activated properly.

Table 1.

Percentages of intracellular cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, and IFN-γ) before and after stimulation in CVID patients and control groups.

Before stimulation After stimulation P
CD3+CD4+IL2+ % Control group 0.10 ± 0.09 6.5 ± 11.6 0.046
Patient group 0.02 ± 0.02 11.7 ± 9.5 0.000
CD3+CD4+IL4+ % Control group 1.35 ± 1.37 3.19 ± 2.76 0.030
Patient group 0.26 ± 0.34 1.91 ± 2.11 0.003
CD3+CD4+IL13+ % Control group 0.13 ± 0.19 0.64 ± 0.76 0.025
Patient group 0.06 ± 0.12 0.77 ± 0.63 0.001
CD3+CD4+IFNγ+ % Control group 1.03 ± 1.15 6.93 ± 8.00 0.009
Patient group 0.33 ± 0.41 8.66 ± 7.86 0.001

Expression of Treg cells

For the intracellular detection of Foxp3, heparinized blood was first stained with anti-CD25-FITC (clone 2A3) and anti-CD4-APC (clone RPA-T4) (BD Pharmingen) for cell surface markers, and then cells were washed in PBS containing FBS and 0.1% sodium azide for cell surface markers. After washing, cells were fixed and permeabilized (permeabilizing buffer, cat. No. 560098) with the appropriate buffers and then stained with intracellular PE-conjugated anti-Foxp3 (clone 259 D/C7) antibody (BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Gating strategy for defining the Treg cells’ frequency in patients with altered percentages compared to representative healthy controls was as follows: CD4+ lymphocytes were gated based on their forward and side scatters. Compensation and the percentage of stained Treg cells was measured by calculating the percentage of CD25+ FoxP3+ double-positive cells within CD4+ population using Cell-Quest software (Becton Dickinson, Belgium) and Flow-Jo software version 8.8.9 (Treestar, US). For determination of Treg frequencies, CD4+ cells with low side scatter were identified and then a forward vs. side scatter gate applied to isolate small lymphocytes and to facilitate the exclusion of cellular debris and non-viable cells. Positive fluorescence staining was established using isotype controls.

Evaluation of growth

Height and weight SDS of patients were determined according to Turkish children’s standards.20 Pubertal development was evaluated according to the method of Tanner and bone age.21,22 A growth rate below the appropriate growth velocity for age was regarded as growth failure.

Evaluation of autoimmunity

In order to evaluate autoimmunity in patients, anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity in serum was determined by immunoflorescence (IF) on mosaic Hep-20-10/liver monkey cell slides (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany) in a double-blind setting. ANA IF titers of 1/100 were taken as cutoff titers. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity with a 1/16 cutoff titer was also evaluated by immunoflorescence. Titrimetric qualitative determinations (+/–) were used. All autoimmune diseases (autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, rheumatoid arthritis, pernicious anemia) records were also evaluated.

Evaluation of coeliac-like disease findings

Gluten-like enteropathy was evaluated from patients’ data records for anti-gliadin (AGA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) IgA antibodies levels which were performed with ELISA. The clinical and also endoscopic findings which were supported with gastroenterology consults confirmed the gluten-like enteropathy diagnosis.

Evaluation of osteoporosis

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Hologic QDR 4500A, Waltham, MA, USA) (g/cm2). The results of BMD were compared to healthy age- and sex-matched Turkish children and Z-scores were calculated.16

All data were expressed as mean plus or minus SD except when indicated otherwise. SPSS 17 program was used for statistical analysis. Correlation comparisons between paired samples were made by Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient. Statistical comparisons of numeric data were made using Student’s t-test. The classified data were evaluated by χ2 test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between clinical parameters and variables. Differences between groups were considered significant at P <0.05.

Results

A total of 20 patients (17 boys, 3 girls) and 26 age-matched controls (12 boys, 14 girls) were included. Mean age of the study group, age at the beginning of symptoms, and mean age at diagnosis were 173.3 ± 77.9 months, 70.1 ± 60.8 months, and 93.3 ± 58.8 months (min. 14 months, max. 204 months), respectively. Mean follow-up time was 80.6 ± 70.3 months. Clinical presentations were as follows: recurrent infections (n = 18, 90%), vasculitis (n = 1, 5%), and autoimmune cytopenia (hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia) (n = 1, 5%). Family history for primary immune deficiencies (consanguinity, primary immunodeficiency history in brothers/sisters/first-degree relatives) was positive in five patients (25%). Fifteen percent of the patients (n = 3) were born to consanguineous parents.

The major complications observed during follow-up were as follows: bronchiectasis (n = 4, 20%), splenomegaly (n = 5, 25%), osteoporosis (n = 6, 30%), delayed growth (n = 6, 30%), autoimmunity (n = 5, 25%), hepatic enlargement (n = 5, 25%), gluten-like enteropathy (n = 2, 10%), granuloma formation (n = 3, 15%), and lymphoma (n = 2, 10%). Autoimmune clinical findings were observed in five patients: chronic arthritis (n = 1), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 2), relapsing polychondritis (n = 1), spondylarthropathy of the hip (n = 1), sacroileitis (n = 1), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and vasculitis (n = 1). Growth failure, autoimmunity, gluten-like enteropathy, osteoporosis, bronchiectasis, splenomegaly, and hepatomegaly were the complications which were significantly prevalent in the severe disease group (Table 2). The complications that presented on admission and developed during follow-up and as well as their observation ages are listed in Table 3.

Table 2.

The complications that have been observed during follow-up in CVID patients (*P <0.05; **Z scores of severe disease group: mean: –2.37 ± –0.38; min_–max: –2.1_–3.1).

Whole group (n = 20)
Severe disease group (n = 6)
Moderate disease group (n = 14)
P
n % n % n %
Growth failure 6 30 6 100 0.000*
Splenomegaly 5 25 4 66.7 1 7.1 0.006*
Hepatomegaly 5 25 4 66.7 1 7.1 0.006*
Bronchiectasis 4 20 3 50 1 7.1 0.032*
Autoimmunity 5 25 4 66.7 1 7.1 0.006*
Giardiasis 3 15 2 33.3 1 7.1 0.143
Osteoporosis 6 30 6** 100 0.000*
Gluten-like enteropathy 2 10 2 33.3 0.026*
Granuloma formation 3 15 2 33.3 1 7.1 0.143
Lymphoma 2 10 1 16.7 1 7.1 0.526

Table 3.

The complications that presented on admission and developed during follow-up as well as their observation ages.

Patient no. with complications Age (months) Age on admission (months) Complications present on admission Complications developed during follow-up/age (months)
1 206 143 Osteoporosis Lymphoma (204)
Granuloma formation (lungs)
Growth failure
2 147 36 (–) Bronchiectasis (72)
Osteoporosis (96)
Granuloma formation (liver) (100)
3 209 193 Osteoporosis (–)
Growth failure
4 204 180 Lymphoma (remission) (–)
5 169 134 Osteoporosis Bronchiectasis (161)
Growth failure
6 350 96 Gluten-like enteropathy Osteoporosis (148)
Growth failure
Bronchiectasis
7 276 144 Gluten-like enteropathy Bronchiectasis (152)
Growth failure Osteoporosis (156)
8 128 96 Bronchiectasis (–)
9 132 42 (–) Granuloma formation (lung) (84)

At the time of diagnosis, before starting intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, baseline IgG level in the whole study group was 405.8 ± 181.6 mg/dl, IgM was 43.4 ± 60.3 mg/dl, and IgA was 43.3 ± 41.6 mg/dl, respectively (the normal immunoglobulin reference range for the mean age of study group ‘173 months’: IgG: 794.4–1209.8, IgM: 61.5–161, IgA: 84.6–143.4 mg/dl). The percentages of CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells and CD3+HLA-DR+ T cells were significantly higher, CD19+ B cells were lower in study group compared to controls (Table 4). White blood cell (WBC) counts, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC), CD3+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD19+CD27+ memory B cells, CD3+CD4+ T helper cells, CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells, CD3-CD16+CD56+ natural killer cells, and HLA-DR+ active T cells of the severe and moderate disease groups did not show any statistically significant difference (Table 4). The percentage of class-switched memory B cells (CD19+CD27+IgM+IgD) was significantly lower in severe patients, although the absolute numbers did not differ. All patients were given regular IVIG replacement therapy with a mean interval of 42.0 ± 11.8, 27.7 ± 4.5, and 50.0 ± 7.7 days in the whole, SD, and MD groups, respectively (P = 0.001).

Table 4.

Immunologic findings in CVID patients and control groups (*P <0.05).

Control group (n = 26) Patient group (n = 20) P Severe disease group (n = 6) Moderate disease group (n = 14) P
WBC /mm3 7214.3 ± 2288.1 7470.1 ± 4395.6 0.826 8833.3 ± 7153.0 6789.2±2254.8 0.522
ALC /mm3 2701.9 ± 1054.5 2524.1 ± 1706.3 0.704 2858.7 ± 2454.7 2358.3±1290.0 0.658
CD3+ Cells /mm3 1918.3 ± 240.4 1968.7 ± 282.6 0.278 2112.5 ±428.8 1879.5 ±219.3 0.287
% 71.1 ± 8.9 78.0 ± 11.2 0.076 73.9 ± 15.0 79.7±9.3 0.413
CD19+ Cells /mm3 351.2 ± 143.2 199.4 ± 161.5 0.871 214.4 ±277.2 179.2 ±115.5 0.507
% 13.0 ± 5.3 7.9 ± 6.4 0.005* 7.5 ± 9.7 7.6 ± 4.9 0.981
C19+CD27+ Cells /mm3 68.4 ± 26.7 56.3 ± 97.2 0.765 21.9 ± 14.3 18.1 ± 6.5 0.262
% 19.9 ± 8.7 19.3 ± 9.5 0.972 14.3 ± 5.8 6.5±1.8 0.441
CD19+CD27+IgMIgD Cells /mm3 40.5 ± 33.0 54.8 ± 13.5 0.697 20.0 ± 16.8 37.0 ± 32.9 0.378
% 19.0 ± 11. 4 21.4 ± 16.9 0.283 5.1 ± 7.1 29.6 ± 13.9 0.001*
CD3+CD4+ Cells /mm3 761.5 ± 174.5 736.2 ± 257.8 0.694 735.1 ± 401.3 723.6 ± 176.6 0.517
% 39.7 ± 9.1 37.4 ± 13.1 0.495 34.8 ± 19.0 38.5 ± 9.4 0.664
CD3+CD8+ Cells /mm3 502.5 ± 118.9 700.8 ± 257.8 0.143 747.8 ± 266.1 670.9 ± 257.4 0.173
% 26.2 ± 6.2 35.6 ± 13.1 0.007* 35.4 ± 12.6 35.7 ± 13.7 0.968
CD3CD16+56+ Cells /mm3 324.2 ± 148.6 229.6 ± 209.5 0.187 311.5 ± 365.9 301.8 ± 136.7 0.781
% 12.1 ± 5.5 9.1 ± 8.3 0.172 10.9 ± 12.8 12.8 ± 5.8 0.646
CD3+HLA DR+ Cells /mm3 117.0 ± 59.4 352.3 ± 354.3 0.006* 509.1 ± 234.4 287.2 ± 375.9 0.754
% 6.1 ± 3.1 17.9 ± 18.0 0.009* 24.1 ± 11.1 15.2 ± 20.0 0.222

The percentages and absolute counts of Treg cells, chemokine receptor expressing T cells, and intracellular IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-13 expressing T helper cells are listed in Table 4. Neither patient and control groups nor severe disease and moderate groups showed any significant difference in terms of percentages and absolute counts of Treg cells, CCR4 (Th2), and CCR5 (Th1) expressing T helper cells. The percentages of CCR7 expressing CD3+ total T cells (P = 0.001), CD3+CD4+ T helper cells (P = 0.038), and CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells (P = 0.038) were significantly lower in patients with severe complications, whereas absolute numbers of these cells did not show any statistically significant difference (P >0.05) (Table 5). There was no significant correlation between Treg cell levels and autoimmune findings (P = 0.419, r = −0.203) (Table 6). On the other hand, presence of autoimmune clinical findings was negatively correlated with CCR7 expression on naive CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells that means as CCR7+ T cells decrease, autoimmune findings are more observed (Table 6).

Table 5.

The percentages and absolute counts of Treg cells, chemokine receptors (CCR4 [CD194], CCR5 [CD195], CCR7 [CD197]), and intracellular cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, and IFN-γ) in CVID patient and control groups (*P <0.05, levels on stimulated lymphocytes).

Control group (n = 26) Whole group (n = 20) P Severe disease group (n = 6) Moderate disease group (n = 14) P
CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ % 1.88 ± 1.96 3.52 ± 2.30 0.098 3.24 ± 2.99 3.66 ± 1.22 0.763
Cells /mm3 19.7 ± 24.3 29.1 ± 39.5 0.571 31.9 ± 62.8 27.2 ± 15.8 0.831
CD3+CD4+CD194+ % 21.2 ± 11.4 16.5 ± 7.81 0.104 19.7 ± 8.63 15.0 ± 7.29 0.277
Cells /mm3 230.7 ± 252.8 130.2 ± 142.5 0.226 171.1 ± 218.2 107.9 ± 84.5 0.399
CD3+CD4+CD195+ % 10.4 ± 6.56 10.0 ± 5.01 0.832 13.9 ± 6.58 8.37 ± 3.16 0.095
Cells /mm3 80.8 ± 69.1 70.6 ± 66.7 0.739 92.1 ± 108.4 58.9 ± 28.5 0.342
CD3+CD4+CD197+ % 28.7 ± 12.7 29.4 ± 15.4 0.860 18.8 ± 12.5 34.0 ± 14.5 0.038*
Cells /mm3 335.0 ± 227.7 247.6 ± 237.4 0.416 176.6 ± 261.8 286.3 ± 226.3 0.380
CD3+CD8+CD197+ % 10.9 ± 5.91 10.9 ± 7.27 0.999 4.92 ± 2.94 13.5 ± 7.06 0.038*
Cells /mm3 73.1 ± 57.1 96.7 ± 127.1 0.654 101.8 ± 203.2 65.4 ± 71.9 0.924
CD3+CD197+ % 36.4 ± 16.8 40.1 ± 21.5 0.533 24.5 ± 14.9 46.8 ± 20.7 0.001*
Cells /mm3 1137.7 ± 641.1 812.6 ± 664.4 0.283 502.1 ± 670.6 981.9 ± 626.2 0.161
CD3+CD4+IL2+† % 6.56 ± 11.6 11.7 ± 9.50 0.173 16.6 ± 11.6 9.13 ± 7.46 0.198
Cells /mm3 23.8 ± 25.6 60.7 ± 45.3 0.104 74.8 ± 44.9 51.3 ± 45.6 0.344
CD3+CD4+IL4+† % 3.19 ± 2.76 1.91 ± 2.11 0.151 1.48 ± 1.09 2.15 ± 2.52 0.460
Cells /mm3 42.2 ± 55.7 8.7 ± 10.2 0.032* 4.8 ± 3.1 11.3 ± 12.6 0.242
CD3+CD4+IL13+† % 0.64 ± 0.76 0.77 ± 0.63 0.591 1.10 ± 0.61 0.59 ± 0.59 0.129
Cells /mm3 2.8 ± 1.6 3.6 ± 3.1 0.562 4.2 ± 3.1 3.2 ± 3.1 0.556
CD3+CD4+ IFNγ+† % 6.93 ± 8.00 8.66 ± 7.86 0.536 12.23 ± 7.37 6.72 ± 7.74 0.176
Cells /mm3 44.4 ± 39.7 78.2 ± 57.1 0.157 53.6 ± 41.1 38.2 ± 40.1 0.484

Table 6.

Statistically significant correlations between chemokine receptor profiles, intracellular cytokine expressions, and complications and clinical findings observed at admission and follow-up.

P r
Hepatomegaly CD3+CD4+IL-2+ 0.026 0.536
CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+ 0.001 0.734
Granuloma CD3+CD4+CD195+ 0.002 0.656
Autoimmunity CD3+CD197+ 0.009 −0.567
CD3+CD4+CD197+ 0.006 −0.587
CD3+CD8+CD197+ 0.016 −0.530

Intracellular IL-2, IL-13, and IFN-γ expressions did not differ in CVID patients and control group in terms of frequency and absolute numbers. Absolute number of CD3+CD4+IL4+ cells were found to be significantly lower in whole disease group compared to healthy controls (8.7 ± 10.2 vs. 42.2 ± 55.7) (P = 0.032) (Table 5).

Patients with hepatomegaly had higher IL-2 and IFN-γ on stimulated CD3+CD4+ cells (Table 6). Patients with granuloma were found to have higher CCR5 expression on CD3+CD4+ cells (P = 0.002, r = 0.656) suggesting that Th1 cells may play a role in granuloma formation (Table 6).

Discussion

CVID is highly heterogeneous immunodeficiency syndrome and may present at any age. About 20% of patients have a family history of immune deficiency and parental consanguinity is a well-known risk factor. In our study, mean age at diagnosis was about 8 years, and family history and parental consanguinity were 25% and 15%, respectively. Although diagnostic delay was not so long (about 2 years), 20% of patients were presenting bronchiectasis and 30% were presenting osteoporosis and growth failure.

Some CVID patients may present low peripheral B cell numbers associated with defective terminal B cell maturation. Kreuzaler et al. reported that 10% of CVID patients have low B cell counts.23 Similar to our previous study,15 there was no significant difference between severe and moderate patient groups in terms of B cell numbers; however, B cells in total CVID patients were significantly lower than healthy controls (Table 4). Previously, it has been reported that there is a decrease in switched memory B cells in CVID patients which is more severe in patients with additional lymphoproliferative, autoimmune, and digestive complications.15 In our study, similar to all other studies, CD19+CD27+IgM+IgD switched memory B cells were found to be significantly decreased in severe CVID patients.

Autoimmune disorders occur with a higher incidence in CVID patients than in the general population. Approximately 20–30% of CVID patients develop autoimmune disorders which sometimes present as the first manifestation of the disease.23 Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), pernicious anemia, autoimmune tiroiditis, alopecia areata, primary biliary cirrhosis, vitiligo, and systemic lupus erythematosus have been described in CVID, however the most common types reported are idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA).23 AIHA (4/14, 28.5% of total autoimmune diseases observed in the study), JIA (4/14, 28.5%), and ITP (3/14, 21.4%) were the most common autoimmune disorders in Abolhassani et al.’s study.23 In our study, autoimmune diseases were observed in five cases (25%) and four of them were in the severe disease group (Table 2).

The pathogenesis of autoimmunity in CVID remains obscure. How autoantibodies can be produced against specific tissues in a state of impaired antibody production is unclear.24 B cells may undergo abnormal somatic hypermutation or there may be a failure to remove self-reactive B cells due to defective receptor editing.25 The lack of switched memory B cells is a characteristic feature of CVID, especially in the cases with autoimmune diseases.4 In our study, the proportions of CD19+CD27+IgDIgM switched memory B cells were significantly lower in severe disease group compared to moderate cases (P = 0.001) (Table 4) that means patients with splenomegaly, granulomatous diseases, bronchiectasis, and autoimmunity have very low switched memory B cells. On the other hand, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that an imbalance in the regulatory immune system plays a major role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease in CVID patients.8 A number of genetic and mechanistic defects may lead to defective regulation by Tregs, because of a deficiency in either Treg frequency or function.8

Tregs play a central role in maintaining self-tolerance and have been implicated in downregulation of the immune response.26 Cell-to-cell contact leading Treg-mediated suppression is thought to be the main mechanism. On the other hand, the immunoregulatory role of IL-10 and TGF-β produced by T cells cannot be ruled out.26 Recently, abnormalities in Treg proportions and functions have been reported in CVID patients.

Genre et al.27 reported for the first time that CVID patients with autoimmune disease had a significantly reduced frequency of Treg cells in their peripheral blood accompanied by a decreased intensity of Foxp3 expression. Foxp3 expression levels in CVID patients without autoimmunity did not differ from those in healthy controls.27 In Arumugakani et al.’s study,28 CVID patients had significantly fewer Treg cells than controls, and low frequency of Treg cells was associated with expansion of CD21lo B cells in patients. In the same study, patients with autoimmunity had significantly reduced frequency but normal numbers of regulatory T cells, while patients with splenomegaly had significant reduction in frequency and number of regulatory T cells.28 In Arandi et al.’s first study in Iranian CVID patients, similar results regarding the proportions of Tregs were obtained.29 In the second study, the levels of immunoregulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β produced by Tregs were also measured. The level of TGF-β did not differ between CVID patients and controls while the amount of IL-10 was remarkably decreased in CVID patients.26 Melo et al. showed significantly reduced Treg cells in CVID patients (P = 0.003) in comparison to healthy subjects.30 In our study, not only percentages, but also absolute numbers of Treg cells did not show any significant difference between CVID cases and healthy controls and also between severe and moderate disease patients (Table 5). The results of previous studies were contradictory and our data may show that Tregs do not play an important role in the pathogenesis of CVID. The low numbers of patients with autoimmunity may be the reason of this non-significant result, because there was no significant correlation between Treg cell numbers and autoimmune findings observed in our patients (Table 6).

Cytokines play an essential role in antibody synthesis. Th1 cells which synthesize cytokines such as IL-2 and IFN-γ have a role in macrophage activation, whereas Th2 cell cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 have a role in the regulation of the humoral immune response. Although cytokine studies highlighting the role of Th1 and Th2 in CVID T cells has been performed in some studies, the results are contradictory. In Rezaei et al.’s study,31 Th2 cytokine levels in serum (IL-4 and IL-10) were significantly higher in the CVID group than controls. However, there were no significant differences in Th1 cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ) between the two groups.31 In two other studies by Holm et al.32 and Zhou et al.,33 the authors have reported a decreased level of IL-10 in CVID. In our study, the only significant difference regarding Th1 and Th2 type intracellular cytokines is the decreased absolute numbers of CD3+CD4+IL4+ cells in CVID cases (P = 0.032) (Table 5). There are some other weak evidences about T helper cell type dominance in CVID patients such as positive correlation between hepatomegaly and high IL-2 and IFN-γ in CD3+CD4+ cells and very high expression of CCR5 (Th1) on CD3+CD4+ cells in patients with granuloma. Rezaei et al.31 agreed that formation of granuloma could be associated with a Th1 response. Similar to our study, based on their finding of significantly increased levels of IFN-γ production in T cells, North et al.34 suggested a Th1 response in CVID, with normal cellular levels of IL-2 production. We suggest that numbers of CVID cases have to be increased in the study group before deciding about Th1 dominance in CVID, because it is a very heterogeneous disease.

The other way to examine Th1/Th2 polarization is to determine chemokine receptors.34 On activation, lymphocytes upregulate a number of chemokine receptors on their surface, which increases the chemotactic sensitivity of lymphocytes to chemokines.10 While naive T cells express CCR7 and CXCR4, activated Th1 cells express CCR5 and CXCR3 and Th2 cells express CCR4 and CCR3.34 Th1 cells bearing CCR5 and CXCR3 are common infiltrates in the rheumatoid synovium whereas Th2 cells bearing CCR3 are predominate in allergic diseases such as asthma and contact dermatitis, but absent from rheumatoid synovium.10

There are few studies investigating the role of chemokine receptors in primary antibody deficiencies. Payne et al.35 hypothesized that abnormal chemokine receptor expression might give rise to defects of lymphocyte migration into lymphoid tissues, and consequently be associated with defective antibody production in primary antibody deficiencies such as CVID and specific polysaccharide antibody deficiency (SPAD). The authors indicated that the expression of CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR7 on peripheral blood lymphocytes was significantly altered in patients with primary antibody deficiency compared with healthy controls.35 Naive (CD27) and memory (CD27+) B cells in study group both showed significantly lower percentages of cells positive for CXCR5 and CCR7.35 There was no clear relationship between abnormal chemokine expression and any clinical complication.35 Fevang et al.36 extended previous reports on dysregulation of CCR7 expression in CVID and reported raised circulatory levels of its ligands CCL19 and CCL21, as well as an attenuated modulatory response to stimulation with these chemokines. In our study, Th1 (CCR5) and Th2 (CCR4) type chemokine receptors did not show any dominance in CVID cases (Table 5). However, as in the studies by Payne et al.35 and Faveng et al.,36 frequencies of CCR7 expressing CD3+ T cells, CD3+CD4+ T helper cells, and CD3+CD8+ T cytotoxic cells were significantly lower in severe CVID patients (Table 5). Moratto et al. also showed that the expressions of CXCR5 and CCR7 were reduced in a subset of CVID patients.37 In addition, presence of autoimmune clinical findings was negatively correlated with CCR7+ cells (Table 6). All of these findings support each other and the probable role of CCR7+ cells in CVID.

The characterization of cell populations was not made at diagnosis in all patients, but it was made at follow-up, when certain complications were already established. It is not therefore so easy to establish a cause–effect correlation between Th1–Th2 polarization and complications.

In conclusion: (1) Our findings did not show reduced proportion of Tregs in CVID patients. Evaluation of other markers related to function of Tregs may provide additional data to clarify whether Tregs play a role in immune dysregulation in CVID disease. (2) Our data showed that severe CVID patients had abnormal chemokine receptor (CCR7) expression compared to healthy controls. As CCR7 is a key mediator balancing immunity and tolerance in the immune system, the abnormality of this mediator might contribute to the profound immune dysregulation seen in CVID. Whether this abnormality is primary or secondary to other factors contributing to the disease remains to be determined. (3) Finally, we compared cytokine production in cells from CVID patients and healthy children and we may speculate Th1 cells seem to be more involved in disease pathogenesis than Th2 cells.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant (no.112S022) from TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) in association with European Research Projects on Rare Diseases (E-RARE).

References

  • 1. Conley M, Notarangelo LD, Etzioni A. (1999) Diagnostic criteria for primary immunodeficiencies. Representing PAGID (Pan-American Group for Immunodeficiency) and ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiency). Clinical Immunology 93: 190–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cunningham-Rundles C. (2008) Autoimmune manifestations in common variable immunodeficiency. Journal of Clinical Immunology 28: 42–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Salzer U, Grimbacher B. (2006) Common variable immunodeficiency: The power of co-stimulation. Seminars in Immunology 18: 337–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Brandt D, Gershwin ME. (2006) Common variable immune deficiency and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity Reviews 5: 465–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Matsuzaki J, Tsuji T, Imazeki I, et al. (2005) Immunosteroid as a regulator for Th1/ Th2 balance: Its possible role in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity 38: 369–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. De Carli M, D’Elios MM, Zancuoghi G, et al. (1994) Human Th1 and Th2 cells: Functional properties, regulation of development and role in autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 18: 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nicholson LB, Kuchroo VK. (1996) Manipulation of the Th1/Th2 balance in autoimmune disease. Current Opinion in Immunology 8: 837–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Brusko TM, Putnam AL, Bluestone JA. (2008) Human regulatory T cells: Role in autoimmune disease and therapeutic opportunities. Immunology Reviews 223: 371–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eddahri F, Oldenhove G, Denanglaire S, et al. (2006) CD41CD251 regulatory T cells control the magnitude of T dependent humoral immune responses to exogenous antigens. European Journal of Immunology 36: 855–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kim CH, Broxmeyer HE. (1999) Chemokines: Signal lamps for trafficking of T and B cells for development and effector function. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 65: 6–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Birkenbach M, Josefsen K, Yalamanchili R, et al. (1993) Epstein-Barr virus-induced genes: First lymphocyte-specific G protein-coupled peptide receptors. Journal of Virology 67: 2209–2220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Paul WE, Seder RA. (1994) Lymphocyte responses and cytokines. Cell 7: 241–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mosmann TR, Sad S. (1996) The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunology Today 17: 138–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rivoisy C, Gerard L, Boutboul D, et al. (2012) Parental consanguinity is associated with a severe phenotype in common variable immunodeficiency. Journal of Clinical Immunology 32: 98–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kutukculer N, Gulez N, Karaca NE, et al. (2012) Three different classifications, B lymphocyte subpopulations, TNFRSF13B (TACI), TNFRSF13C (BAFF-R), TNFSF13 (APRIL) gene mutations, CTLA-4 and ICOS gene polymorphisms in Turkish patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Clinical Immunology 32: 1165–1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aksu G, Genel F, Koturoglu G, et al. (2006) Serum immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgA) and IgG subclass concentrations in healthy children: A study using nephelometric technique. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 48: 19–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lee JA, Spidlen J, Boyce K, et al. (2008) MIFlowCyt: The minimum information about a flow cytometry experiment. Cytometry A 73(10): 926–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Roederer M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Parks DR. (2004) Guidelines for the presentation of flow cytometric data. Methods in Cell Biology 75: 241–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Alvarez DF, Helm K, Degregori J, et al. (2010) Publishing flow cytometry data. American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 298(2): L127–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Neyzi O, Yalçındag A, Alp H. (1973) Heights and weights of Turkish children. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics and Environmental Child Health 19: 5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. No authors listed (1973) Recording adolescent physical changes: Tanner’s system. Delaware Medical Journal 45: 84–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Goksen D, Darcan S, Coker M, et al. (2006) Bone mineral density of healthy Turkish children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 9: 84–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Abolhassani H, Amirkashani D, Parvaneh N, et al. (2013) Autoimmune phenotype in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Journal of Investigative Allergology & Clinical Immunology 23: 323–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Agarwal S, Cunningham-Rundles C. (2009) Autoimmunity in common variable immunodeficiency. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 9: 347–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Knight AK, Cunningham-Rundles C. (2006) Inflammatory and autoimmune complications of common variable immune deficiency. Autoimmunity Reviews 5: 156–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Arandi N, Mirshafiey A, Jeddi-Tehrani M, et al. (2013) Evaluation of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells function in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Cellular Immunology 291: 129–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Genre J, Errante PR, Kokron CM, et al. (2009) Reduced frequency of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells and diminished Foxp3 expression in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. A link to autoimmunity. Clinical Immunology 132: 215–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Arumugakani G, Wood PMD, Carter CRD. (2010) Frequency of Treg cells is reduced in CVID patients with autoimmunity and splenomegaly and is associated with expanded CD21lo B lymphocytes. Journal of Clinical Immunology 30: 292–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Arandi N, Mirshafiey A, Abolhassani H, et al. (2013) Frequency and expression of inhibitory markers of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 77: 405–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Melo KM, Carvalho KI, Bruno FR, et al. (2009) A decreased frequency of regulatory T cells in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. PLoS One 4(7): e6269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rezaei N, Aghamohammadi A, Kardar GA, et al. (2008) T helper 1 and 2 cytokine assay in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Journal of Investigative Allergology and Clinical Immunology 18: 449–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Holm AM, Aukrust P, Aandahi EM, et al. (2003) Impaired secretion of IL-10 by T cells from patients with common variable immunodeficiency-involvement of protein kinase A type I. Journal of Immunology 170: 5772–5777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhou Z, Huang R, Danon M, et al. (1998) IL-10 production in common variable immunodeficiency. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 86: 298–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. North ME, Ivory K, Funauchi M, et al. (1996) Intracellular cytokine production by human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from normal and immunodeficient donors using directly conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies and three-colour flow cytometry. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 105: 517–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Payne D, Drinkwater S, Baretto R, et al. (2009) Expression of chemokine receptors CXCR4, CXCR5 and CCR7 on B and T lymphoctes from patients with primary antibody deficiency. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 156: 254–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Fevang B, Yndestad A, Damas JK, et al. (2009) Chemokines and common variable immunodeficiency; possible contribution of CCL19, CCL21 and CCR7 to immune dysregulation. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 158: 237–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Moratto D, Gulino AV, Fontana S, et al. (2006) Combined decrease of defined B and T cell subsets in a group of common variable immunodeficiency patients. Clinical Immunology 121(2): 203–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES