Abstract
At least 10 percent of older adults may experience abuse, neglect or exploitation annually in the United States, and this problem is expected to grow as our population ages. Little is known about the prevalence and characteristics of elder abuse among Veterans, but this population is likely at high-risk based on established elder abuse risk factors. Compared to the general population, Veterans who receive their care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) have higher prevalence of poor psychological health, poor physical health, functional impairment, cognitive impairment and social isolation. As the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the VHA has long been a leader in the development of innovative, integrated care programs for populations of geriatric patients. Now, the VHA again has an opportunity to lead by promoting research, clinical care and education in the area of elder abuse, furthering their mission of serving those who served. This article outlines the rationale for developing a research agenda for elder abuse within the VHA as well as potential first steps towards understanding more about this complex problem impacting Veterans.
Keywords: Elder abuse, Elder Justice, Veterans
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has long been tasked with providing care to our Nation’s Veterans, including those who are most vulnerable or at risk. As the healthcare system specifically dedicated to meeting the needs of those who served our country, the VHA has often been at the forefront of developing innovative, integrated care programs. Nowhere has this been more evident than in their pioneering research on geriatric syndromes and models of clinical care for Veterans in later life. From the development of long-term care programs within the VA in 1964 to the advent of Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (GRECCs) in the early 1970s to pioneering comprehensive home-based primary care programs (HBPC) and more recently the innovation of Medical Foster Home, the VA has always been a leader in using research and education to improve care for vulnerable older adults.1 Given the recent and anticipated future growth of the population of older Veterans,2,3 particularly those who receive care through the VHA,4 this focus on innovative, integrated care is of increasing importance. The VHA now has another opportunity for leadership in the care of Veterans facing the challenges of aging, disability, or serious illness: improving identification, intervention, and prevention of abuse, neglect and exploitation.
Abuse, neglect and exploitation occur commonly and can dramatically impact the health and well-being of older adults. Elder abuse is defined as harm of an older adult by another person or entity, that occurs in any setting either in a relationship where there is an expectation of trust, and/or when an older person is targeted based on age or disability.5 Mistreatment can include physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation, with many individuals suffering from multiple types. Studies have shown as many as 10 percent of community-dwelling older adults suffer from mistreatment each year,6–9 and rates may be much higher among those with dementia10 and residents in skilled nursing facilities.11 Abuse has been linked to adverse health outcomes in older adults including depression12 and dramatically increased mortality.13–15 Older adults experiencing mistreatment are also at increased risk of emergency room visits,16 hospitalization17 and nursing home placement.18 Though challenging to quantify, abuse of older adults is estimated to cost many billions of dollars in direct medical costs each year.5 Currently, most cases go undetected, with as few as 1 in 24 cases identified and reported to authorities.8 Much of the morbidity and mortality may be related to this poor detection.19
Veterans: A population potentially at risk
Limited research exists examining elder abuse in sub-populations of older adults, and despite calls for further investigation in this area,20 we know of little published research focusing on U.S. Military Veterans. In the only study we are aware of examining elder abuse among Veterans,21 Moon et al uncovered that reports to Adult Protective Services for elder abuse were made for 5.4 percent of older adults receiving care through the VHA in Los Angeles. As it is widely accepted that most cases of elder abuse go unreported, this figure suggests that a much higher percentage of Veterans may be experiencing abuse or neglect. Existing literature on risk factors for abuse also strongly suggests that Veterans, and particularly those who receive care within the VHA, may be at high risk for experiencing abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
Poor Mental and Physical Health
Poor mental health, prior trauma, and depression increase risk of elder abuse victimization.22–25 Through combat as well as other military experiences, exposure to trauma is near ubiquitous for Veterans. One prior survey of older male Veterans found that 85 percent reported prior exposure to a traumatic event.26 While prevalence estimates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Veterans tend to vary greatly depending on the population being studied,27 rates of PTSD are much higher than in the non-veteran population. Furthermore, though Veterans may have similar rates of anxiety and depression as non-veterans,28 for those who receive care within the VHA the prevalence of depression is higher than the general population.26
Poor physical health has also been linked to increased risk of elder abuse.6,29 Veterans over age 55 are more likely to have two or more chronic medical conditions compared to similarly aged non-veterans and are also more likely to report their health as poor or fair.30
Functional and Cognitive Impairment
Functional dependence and physical disability have repeatedly been shown to increase abuse risk,6,29,31–33 which is concerning given that more than half of older Veterans report difficulties in physical functioning.34 Cognitive impairment may dramatically increase the risk of elder abuse,35,36 and projections by the VA estimate that 18–28% of Veterans over the age of 80 had dementia in 2014, with the prevalence by age and gender expected to increase by 2019.37
Social Isolation
Various components of social isolation have been linked to increased risk of elder abuse. Being divorced or separated is a risk factor for experiencing abuse,32 and the presence of a spouse or other romantic partner appears protective.29,33 Loneliness in an older adult has been shown to increase risk for mistreatment in China38 and the U.K.25 Due to a range of factors, older Veterans experience a high burden of social isolation and loneliness. When compared to similar non-veteran patients, VHA patients have a higher prevalence of loneliness,39 with some studies reporting a prevalence as high as 44 percent in older Veterans.40 More than 50 percent of older Veterans may experience social isolation.41 And, while Veterans overall are more likely to be married than non-veterans,42 older Veterans who receive care through the VHA are less likely to be married than those who do not.4
Low Socioeconomic Status
Low socioeconomic status, which may make elders more dependent on others and provide fewer options for living and caregiving arrangements, is a risk factor for elder abuse victimization.6,32,33 Due to the financial and relational benefits that are afforded to those who served in the military, Veterans on the whole experience less poverty than the general population. However, as the VHA serves as a safety-net healthcare system for Veterans who may not be able to access healthcare in the private system, the socioeconomic status of Veterans who receive VHA care is much lower than those who predominantly receive care in the community.4
A Growing Older Veteran Population
Veterans are older than the overall U.S. population.2 In addition, while the proportion of the population over age 65 is growing across the U.S., the pace of this growth is accelerated among Veterans. In 2015, adults over age 60 represented 55% of all Veterans3 compared to about 15% in the general population.43 Furthermore, Veterans who receive their care within the VHA tend to be older than those who do not.4
Call to action: Expand knowledge and improve care for Veterans affected by elder abuse
While Vognar et al have raised awareness about the potential scope of the problem of elder abuse among Veterans,20 a coordinated research agenda has not yet materialized. Here we propose a call to action. Many older Veterans are likely experiencing abuse, neglect, or exploitation with this mistreatment having a profound effect on their health and quality of life. The VHA has an opportunity to take a leadership role in response to this important and challenging issue, which will grow as the Veteran population ages. In recognizing the urgency of this threat to the well being of older Veterans, the VA is well positioned to further elucidate the problem, develop effective interventions, and disseminate this knowledge. Failing to do so may result in continued undetected abuse among older Veterans, leading to downstream poor health outcomes, increased healthcare utilization, and higher costs.
A senior leader from the VA sits on the Elder Justice Coordinating Council, which was formed under the Elder Justice Act passed in 201044 and is tasked with implementing recommendations for increased federal involvement in elder abuse. One of the 8 recommendations is to develop a federal elder justice research agenda.44 As the largest integrated health system in the country, the VA is poised to lead this charge. Furthermore, pursuing elder abuse work aligns with related VHA clinical priorities. Secretary Shulkin has called suicide prevention the “top clinical priority” for the VHA. Older Veterans are at high risk for this tragic outcome. It is known that the suicide completion rate among older adults is much higher than for any other age group.45 Active research efforts are underway in the VHA to identify modifiable risk factors that predispose older Veterans to suicide. While rigorous studies are lacking, some hypothesize that experiencing abuse may be a risk factor for suicide among older adults,46 and calls for further work studying this potential connection have been made.47
Broadening Understanding of a Unique Population
Research is a critical next step, and many strategies may be used to understand Veterans’ experiences of elder abuse as well as the unique challenges of identifying, intervening, and preventing mistreatment in this population. For example, Veterans may be uniquely less likely to disclose abuse or neglect to providers due to stigma around vulnerability and victimhood.48 In addition, with an over 100-page patient privacy policy49 and a privacy officer at every VHA facility dedicated to investigating incidents of potential privacy violations, the culture of privacy protection at the VA may lead providers to be hesitant to report suspected elder abuse, or to believe that proof, rather than suspicion alone, is needed prior to reporting.
Initial studies may include focus groups and qualitative interviews with Veterans and VHA providers to understand their experiences and current practices surrounding suspected elder abuse. Findings of these may inform larger-scale national surveys to quantify prevalence as well as existing approaches for identification, intervention, and prevention. Creative approaches such as linking local or national VHA databases to Adult Protective Services or law enforcement data sets of known victims may be useful to identify cases of elder abuse in Veterans to study in more detail. Research should describe characteristics of Veterans who experience elder abuse and generate potential Veteran specific risk factors. Risk factors unique to the Veteran population that may aid in detection would be valuable to assist in identifying vulnerable individuals. For example, one might hypothesize that Veterans receiving VA pensions or other VA monetary benefits might be at elevated risk of financial exploitation.
Building Programs to Help Veterans and Others
Data supporting specific elder abuse intervention models are currently lacking and more studies need to be done prior to widespread adoption and implementation within the VHA, community healthcare systems, and social service agencies. Every VA Medical Center is required by policy to establish a local training on abuse and neglect for staff and to outline policy on reporting cases of abuse and neglect. However, additional study is needed to determine types and efficacy of interventions provided. The VHA is the largest healthcare system in the U.S., presenting immense opportunity for developing, testing and disseminating innovative programs for elder abuse interventions. In many settings, successful elder abuse programs have been multi-disciplinary.50,51 The VHA is a potentially ideal environment for integrated, multi-disciplinary approaches. Furthermore, the VHA national health record facilitates longitudinal follow-up for Veterans who have experienced abuse previously, who often continue to be at risk.
Focusing on elder abuse represents an important opportunity for an organization that historically has both collected high quality national data and used these data to design and scale innovative models of clinical care for older adults. For example, VA’s home-based primary care (HBPC) program started in 1972 with a pilot of six locations. Currently, HBPC teams are caring for Veterans with some of the most complex problems at over 130 VHA medical centers. The VHA’s current development of the Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Assistance Program may be a model way forward for elder abuse program development. Recognizing IPV as a significant problem, the VA convened a task force that developed 14 recommendations for high quality IPV care. These recommendations are being piloted in six VA facilities nationally in two phases and are being evaluated using a Modified Delphi instrument. Concurrently, this assessment tool has been administered to all VA facilities nationally to gather information on the current state of IPV programming. The eventual goal will be to disseminate a successful IPV Assistance Program nationally.
While this describes an effective top down approach, local VHA medical facilities may also have developed effective programs for elder abuse and neglect. These programs need to be studied, and those that are effective should be disseminated so that Veterans throughout the country may benefit from best practices that address the unique needs of the Veteran population. There are multiple avenues for doing this within the VA including annual calls from the Secretary for best practices for the diffusion of excellence and already-established national monthly calls for different service lines. Furthermore, as the VHA has historically done in the care of older adults, programs generated within the VHA would push the field of elder abuse forward in community health systems as well.
Challenges and a Way Forward
Variability in state laws regarding reporting of suspected cases of abuse is one obstacle limiting cohesive national efforts. Furthermore, as a federal organization, a state cannot ordinarily compel a VHA facility or its employees, while acting within the scope of their employment, to comply with state law. VA has provided national policy guidance on this issue. In 2012, VA released a directive on “Reporting Cases of Abuse and Neglect” that stipulated that all VHA facilities must comply with their own state laws for reporting abuse and neglect.52 This directive also mandated documentation of the report, examination and subsequent treatment offered in the Veteran’s medical record. One way for the VA to continue this path of leadership would be to call for an inter-agency federal task force on elder abuse. This might include members from the VA, the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, and other departments that have a stake in this complex problem affecting us all as we age. VA leadership could also call for congressional funding for the Elder Justice Act, which has not yet been fully funded. The VA can stimulate research in elder abuse by allocating research dollars or issuing Requests for Applications in this area. They could spearhead efforts at collaboration between state and federal agencies, as well as with private-sector innovators as laid out in the 2015 White House Conference on Aging.53
Conclusion
The Veterans Health Administration has a mandate to provide high quality care for the country’s Veterans. It has a long history of embracing this mission by pioneering leadership in program development, education and research. Now, as the aging of the Veteran population accelerates, the VHA has a new opportunity to lead. The VHA should seize opportunities to partner with the Department of Justice, law enforcement, community service agencies, and social and medical science researchers to leverage their expertise in abuse and neglect. Educational programs for Veterans should be developed and existing trainings for providers enhanced. New, innovative interventions should be nurtured with metrics for evaluation established. By focusing on clinical care, education and research for elder abuse and neglect, the VHA will dramatically improve care for older Veterans who are most at-risk, while also furthering the mission of serving those who served.
Acknowledgments
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts to declare.
Author contributions: Makaroun and Rosen: Manuscript concept, design, preparation, original writing and final approval of version to be published. Taylor: critical revision of manuscript and final approval of version to be published.
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Richard Allman, Chief Consultant, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care for the VA, for his editorial comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Sponsor’s Role: No sponsor had a role in the design, preparation or decision to publish this manuscript.
Funding: Dr. Rosen’s participation was supported by a GEMSSTAR (Grants for Early Medical and Surgical Subspecialists’ Transition to Aging Research) grant (R03 AG048109) and by a Paul B. Beeson Emerging Leaders in Aging Career Development Award (K76 AG054866) from the National Institute on Aging. Dr. Rosen is also the recipient of a Jahnigen Career Development Award, supported by the John A. Hartford Foundation, the American Geriatrics Society, the Emergency Medicine Foundation, and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
References
- 1.Maddox GL. The Encyclopedia of Aging: A Comprehensive Resource in Gerontology and Geriatrics. Springer; 2013. p. 1357. [Google Scholar]
- 2.U.S. Census Bureau. 65+ in the United States: 2010 [Internet] Washington, DC: 2014. Jun, [cited 2017 Jan 9]. Report No.: P23-212. Available from: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/demo/p23-212.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Table 1L: VETPOP2014 LIVING VETERANS BY AGE GROUP, GENDER, 2013–2043 [Internet] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics; 2016. [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/veteran_population.asp. [Google Scholar]
- 4.RAND Corporation, CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare. Assessment A: Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 Section 201: Independent Assessment of the Health Care Delivery Systems and Management Processes of the Department of Veterans Affairs [Internet] U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; 2015. Sep, [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.va.gov/opa/choiceact/documents/assessments/Assessment_A_Demographics.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Connolly M, Brandl B, Breckman R. The Elder Justice Roadmap: A Stakeholder Initiative to Respond to an Emerging Health, Justice, Financial and Social Crisis [Internet] U.S. Deparment of Justice; 2014. Jan, [cited 2017 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.justice.gov/file/852856/download. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, Resnick HS, Steve K, Muzzy W, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Emotional, Physical, Sexual, and Financial Abuse and Potential Neglect in the United States: The National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):292–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.163089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lachs MS, Pillemer KA. Elder Abuse. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1947–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1404688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Under the Radar: New York State Elder Abuse Prevalence Study [Internet] New York, NY: Lifespan of Greater Rochester, Inc., Weill Cornell Medical Center of Cornell University, and New York City Department for the Ageing; 2011. May, [cited 2016 Oct 13]. Available from: http://ocfs.ny.gov/main/reports/Under%20the%20Radar%2005%2012%2011%20final%20report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lachs MS, Pillemer K. Elder abuse. The Lancet. 2004 Oct 2;364(9441):1263–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dyer CB, Pavlik VN, Murphy KP, Hyman DJ. The High Prevalence of Depression and Dementia in Elder Abuse or Neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Feb 1;48(2):205–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lachs MS, Teresi JA, Ramirez M, van Haitsma K, Silver S, Eimicke JP, et al. The Prevalence of Resident-to-Resident Elder Mistreatment in Nursing Homes. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):229. doi: 10.7326/M15-1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dong X, Chen R, Chang E-S, Simon M. Elder abuse and psychological well-being: a systematic review and implications for research and policy--a mini review. Gerontology. 2013;59(2):132–42. doi: 10.1159/000341652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lachs MS, Williams CS, O’Brien S, Pillemer KA, Charlson ME. The mortality of elder mistreatment. JAMA. 1998 Aug 5;280(5):428–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.5.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schofield MJ, Powers JR, Loxton D. Mortality and disability outcomes of self-reported elder abuse: a 12-year prospective investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61(5):679–85. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dong X, Simon M, Mendes de Leon C, Fulmer T, Beck T, Hebert L, et al. Elder self-neglect and abuse and mortality risk in a community-dwelling population. JAMA. 2009 Aug 5;302(5):517–26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong X, Simon MA. Association between elder abuse and use of ED: findings from the Chicago Health and Aging Project. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr 1;31(4):693–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dong X, Simon MA. Elder abuse as a risk factor for hospitalization in older persons. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):911–7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lachs MS, Williams CS, O’Brien S, Pillemer KA. Adult protective service use and nursing home placement. The Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):734–9. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murphy K, Waa S, Jaffer H, Sauter A, Chan A. A literature review of findings in physical elder abuse. Can Assoc Radiol J J Assoc Can Radiol. 2013 Feb;64(1):10–4. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vognar L, Dosa D, Taylor L. The Impact of Elder Abuse on a Growing Senior Veteran Population. Fed Pract. 2016 Aug;33(8):22–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moon A, Lawson K, Carpiac M, Spaziano E. Elder abuse and neglect among veterans in Greater Los Angeles: prevalence, types, and intervention outcomes. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2006;46(3–4):187–204. doi: 10.1300/J083v46n03_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.LICHTENBERG PA, STICKNEY L, PAULSON D. Is Psychological Vulnerability Related to the Experience of Fraud in Older Adults? Clin Gerontol. 2013 Mar 1;36(2):132–46. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2012.749323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Naughton C, Drennan J, Lyons I, Lafferty A, Treacy M, Phelan A, et al. Elder abuse and neglect in Ireland: results from a national prevalence survey. Age Ageing. 2012 Jan;41(1):98–103. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dong X, Simon MA, Odwazny R, Gorbien M. Depression and elder abuse and neglect among a community-dwelling Chinese elderly population. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2008;20(1):25–41. doi: 10.1300/J084v20n01_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Manthorpe J, Biggs S, McCreadie C, Tinker A, Hills A, O’Keefe M, et al. The U.K. national study of abuse and neglect among older people. Nurs Older People. 2007 Oct;19(8):24–6. doi: 10.7748/nop2007.10.19.8.24.c6268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hankin CS, Spiro A, Miller DR, Kazis L. Mental disorders and mental health treatment among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs outpatients: the Veterans Health Study. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;156(12):1924–30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Richardson LK, Frueh BC, Acierno R. Prevalence estimates of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: critical review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;44(1):4–19. doi: 10.3109/00048670903393597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gould CE, Rideaux T, Spira AP, Beaudreau SA. Depression and anxiety symptoms in male veterans and non-veterans: the Health and Retirement Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;30(6):623–30. doi: 10.1002/gps.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Laumann EO, Leitsch SA, Waite LJ. Elder mistreatment in the United States: prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Jul;63(4):S248–54. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.4.s248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kramarow EA, Pastor PN. The Health of Male Veterans and Nonveterans Aged 25–64: United States, 2007–2010 [Internet] Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Aug, [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db101.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Amstadter AB, Zajac K, Strachan M, Hernandez MA, Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R. Prevalence and correlates of elder mistreatment in South Carolina: the South Carolina elder mistreatment study. J Interpers Violence. 2011 Oct;26(15):2947–72. doi: 10.1177/0886260510390959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Burnes D, Pillemer K, Caccamise PL, Mason A, Henderson CR, Berman J, et al. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Elder Abuse and Neglect in the Community: A Population-Based Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1906–12. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Peterson JC, Burnes DPR, Caccamise PL, Mason A, Henderson CR, Wells MT, et al. Financial Exploitation of Older Adults: A Population-Based Prevalence Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1615–23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2946-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Villa VM, Harada ND, Washington D, Damron-Rodriguez J. The health and functional status of US veterans aged 65+: implications for VA health programs serving an elderly, diverse veteran population. Am J Med Qual Off J Am Coll Med Qual. 2003 Jun;18(3):108–16. doi: 10.1177/106286060301800304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.VandeWeerd C, Paveza GJ, Walsh M, Corvin J. Physical Mistreatment in Persons with Alzheimer’s Disease. J Aging Res. 2013 Mar 17;2013:e920324. doi: 10.1155/2013/920324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lachs MS, Williams C, O’Brien S, Hurst L, Horwitz R. Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: A nine-year observational cohort study. The Gerontologist. 1997;37:469–474. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.4.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Projections of the Prevalence and Incidence of Dementias Including Alzheimer’s Disease for the Total Veteran, Enrolled and Patient Populations Age 65 and Older [Internet] Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Policy and Planning; 2013. Sep, pp. 1–21. [cited 2017 Sep 13] Available from: https://www.va.gov/GERIATRICS/docs/Methodology_Paper_Projections_of_the_Prevalence_and_Incidence_of_Dementias_v5_FINAL.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dong X, Simon MA, Gorbien M, Percak J, Golden R. Loneliness in older chinese adults: a risk factor for elder mistreatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1831–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wharton TC, Nnodim J, Hogikyan R, Mody L, James M, Montagnini M, et al. Assessing health status differences between Veterans Affairs home-based primary care and state Medicaid Waiver Program clients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Apr;14(4):260–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kuwert P, Knaevelsrud C, Pietrzak RH. Loneliness among older veterans in the United States: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Off J Am Assoc Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;22(6):564–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Greysen SR, Horwitz LI, Covinsky KE, Gordon K, Ohl ME, Justice AC. Does social isolation predict hospitalization and mortality among HIV+ and uninfected older Veterans? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1456–63. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. Profile of Vetearns: 2014, Data from the American Community Survey [Internet] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics; 2016. Mar, [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Profile_of_Veterans_2014.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Table 6. Percent Distribution of the Projected Population by Sex and Selected Age Groups for the United States: 2015 to 2060 (NP2014-T6). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division; 2014 Dec.
- 44.Colello KJ. The Elder Justice Act: Background and Issues for Congress [Internet] Congressional Research Service. 2017 Jan; [cited 2017 Aug 30]. Available from: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43707.pdf.
- 45.Suicide Statistics [Internet] American Foundation for Suicide Prevention; [cited 2017 Jul 19]. Available from: https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/ [Google Scholar]
- 46.Conwell Y. Elder Abuse — A Risk Factor for Suicide? Crisis. 1995 Jan 1;16(3):104–5. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.16.3.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Salvatore T. Elder Abuse and Suicidal Behavior: What Forensic Professionals Need to Know. Forensic Sch Today. 2017 Jan 30;2(3) [Google Scholar]
- 48.Richards LK, Goetter EM, Wojtowicz M, Simon NM. Stigma and Prejudice [Internet] Humana Press; Cham: 2016. Stigma and Health Services Use Among Veterans and Military Personnel; pp. 203–26. [cited 2017 Aug 30] (Current Clinical Psychiatry). Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-27580-2_12. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Privacy and Releast of Information: VHA Directive 1605.01 [Internet] Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration; 2016. Aug, [cited 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: file:///Users/Lenamak/Downloads/1605_01_D_2016-08-31.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rizzo VM, Burnes D, Chalfy A. A systematic evaluation of a multidisciplinary social work-lawyer elder mistreatment intervention model. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2015;27(1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.792104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Teaster PB, Nerenberg L, Stansbury KL. A national look at elder abuse multi-disciplinary teams. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2003;15(3–4):91–107. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. Reporting Cases of Abuse and Neglect [Internet] VHA DIRECTIVE 2012-022. 2012 Sep 3;:5. Available from: https://www.va.gov/vhapublications/publications.cfm?pub=1.
- 53.White House Conference on Ageing 2015 Executive Summary [Internet] The White House; 2015. [cited 2017 Sep 1]. Available from: https://whitehouseconferenceonaging.gov/2015-WHCOA-Final-Report.pdf. [Google Scholar]