Table 4.
Method | NMC | Q 2 | DQ 2 | AUROC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TSA | 64 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.60 |
2 | IS | 77 | − 0.33 | 0.005 | 0.37 |
3 | UO | 57 | − 0.04 | 0.007 | 0.61 |
4 | PQN | 62 | − 0.05 | − 0.03 | 0.64 |
5 | Loess | 1 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 1 |
6 | Contrast | 23 | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.99 |
7 | Quantile | 7 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.99 |
8 | Linear | 86 | − 0.69 | − 0.02 | 0.28 |
9 | Li Wong | 64 | − 0.25 | − 0.03 | 0.56 |
10 | Spline | 7 | 0.36 | 0.7 | 1 |
11 | VSN | 0 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1 |
12 | None | 33 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.77 |
NMC Number of misclassifications, DQ2 discriminant Q2, AUROC area under the receiver operating curve. The measures are discussed in (Saccenti 2017)