Skip to main content
PMC home page
Virulence logoLink to Virulence
. 2017 Aug 25;8(8):1753–1760. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1362533

Lactobacillus fermentum 3872 as a potential tool for combatting Campylobacter jejuni infections

B Lehri 1, A M Seddon 1,✉, A V Karlyshev 1
PMCID: PMC5810503  PMID: 28766992

ABSTRACT

Due to the global spread of multidrug resistant pathogenic bacteria, alternative approaches in combating infectious diseases are required. One such approach is the use of probiotics. Lactobacillus fermentum 3872 is a promising probiotic bacterium producing a range of antimicrobial compounds, such as hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid. In addition, previous studies involving genome sequencing and analysis of L. fermentum 3872 allowed the identification of a gene encoding a cell surface protein referred to as collagen binding protein (CBP) (not found in other strains of the species, according to the GenBank database), consisting of a C-terminal cell wall anchor domain (LPXT), multiple repeats of ‘B domains' that form stalks presenting an “A domain” required for adhesion. In this study, we found that the CBP of L. fermentum 3872 binds to collagen I present on the surface of the epithelial cells lining the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, we found that this host receptor is also used for attachment by the major gastrointestinal pathogen, Campylobacter jejuni. Furthermore, we identified an adhesin involved in such interaction and demonstrated that both L. fermentum 3872 and its CBP can inhibit binding of this pathogen to collagen I. Combined with the observation that C. jejuni growth is affected in the acidic environment produced by L. fermentum 3872, the finding provides a good basis for further investigation of this strain as a potential tool for fighting Campylobacter infections.

KEYWORDS: adhesion, antimicrobials, Campylobacter jejuni, collagen I, collagen binding protein, Lactobacillus, multi-drug resistance, probiotics

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni is an enteric pathogen and one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis in humans with symptoms such as abdominal pains, watery or bloody diarrhea, and fever.1 In rare cases, C. jejuni infections can lead to a neurodegenerative disease such as Guillain-Barre syndrome.2 C. jejuni infections are often caused by poor hygiene standards, consumption of undercooked meat, contaminated water and/or milk.3 Fatalities associated with C. jejuni infections are uncommon, although can occur among immunologically naïve patients.4 C. jejuni infections are an economic burden leading to many hospitalisations/primary care visits.5

There has been a rise in antimicrobial resistant forms of C. jejuni caused by the misuse of antimicrobials.6 C. jejuni has also been placed on a list of antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens by the world health organization (WHO) to promote research and development in novel antimicrobials.7 Due to the appearance of multidrug resistant forms of these bacteria, there is growing interest in alternative approaches to combat C. jejuni infections, such as those using probiotics, bacteriocins and bacteriophages, with the most recent focus on probiotics.1 Effective usage of the latter requires a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of their action. The antagonistic activity of probiotics is associated with the production of bacteriocins, lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, competition for nutrients and colonisation niches, as well as modulation of host immune response.1,8

Lactobacillus fermentum 3872 is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobe isolated from milk of a healthy woman.9 L. fermentum 3872 produces lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide and is capable of binding to human HeLa and buccal cells.9 Genome sequencing of L. fermentum 3872 revealed genes required for bacterial survival in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as those potentially involved in interaction with fibronectin, mucin and collagen, such as the genes encoding enolase and 2 collagen binding proteins.10,11 The full and partial copies of the collagen-binding protein (CBP) encoding genes were found to be located on a plasmid and chromosome respectively.10,11 Collagen I, which is one of several types of collagens ubiquitous in mammals, is commonly found on the surface of host cells present in the gastrointestinal tract.12 In this study, we confirmed the affinity of the putative CBP of L. fermentum 3872 to collagen I and found that both CBP and L. fermentum 3872 compete with C. jejuni for binding to this host cell receptor. In addition, a role of C. jejuni flagellum in binding to collagen I was established.

Results

The purified CBP of L. fermentum 3872 interferes with Campylobacter binding to collagen I

Expression of the L. fermentum 3872 CPB in E. coli as a His-tagged fusion protein allowed its purification as a stable product of an expected size (111 kDa predicted, 115 kDa estimated from a gel, Fig. S1). The slight (3.6%) difference in the sizes is likely to be due to conformational properties of the protein, which is typical for large outer membrane proteins of bacteria.13 It was found that the CBP binds to collagen I in a concentration-dependent manner with no increase in absorbance above 0.1 µg/well of CBP (Fig. 1). Since C. jejuni strains 11168H and 81–176 were also able to bind to collagen I in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2), we aimed to establish if these bacteria compete with the purified CBP for the binding sites.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

ELISA experiments showing CBP binding to collagen I; the data represent 2 biologic repeats each with 3 technical repeats (n = 6).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Detection of adhesion of C. jejuni strains 81–176 (A) and 11168H (B) to collagen I using ELISA; the data represent 2 biologic repeats each with 3 technical repeats (n = 6) apart from (A), 2 × 108 cfu/well, where n = 5.

Inhibition of C. jejuni attachment to collagen I was detected when using 2 µg of CBP per well (Fig. 3). We were then wondering if a similar inhibition of Campylobacter could be observed when using whole cells of L. fermentum. As expected, the inhibition was observed when using high Lactobacillus/Campylobacter cell ratios (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, some increase in C. jejuni binding was seen when using smaller amounts of L. fermentum 3872 (Fig. 4). As described in the discussion section, this could be a result of aggregation of Campylobacter bacteria.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Effect of CBP (2 µg/well) on adhesion of C. jejuni strains 81–176 (A) and 11168H (B) in binding to collagen I, the bars labeled ‘control’ have respective C. jejuni strains (2 × 107 cfu/well) only, while that labeled CBP has a mixture of 2 µg CBP and 2 × 107 cfu/well C. jejuni; the data represent 3 biologic repeats each with 3 technical repeats (n = 9).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Competition between. L. fermentum 3872 and C. jejuni strains 81–176 (A) and 11168H (B) for binding to collagen I detected using ELISA, the bars labeled ‘control’ have respective C. jejuni strains of amount 2 × 107 cfu/well added only, the ratios indicated on the graph are based on cell to cell amounts added to each well; the data represent 2 biologic repeats each with 3 technical repeats (n = 6). Control (B) and 1:10 (B) represent data with 3 biologic repeats each with 3 technical repeats each (n = 9).

Identification of C. jejuni proteins involved in collagen I adhesion

While genome sequencing reveals genes encoding potential collagen binding proteins of L. fermentum 3872, one of which was the subject of this study, no such proteins could be identified in the genomes of C. jejuni strains 11168H and 81–176. Therefore, attempts to identify such proteins were undertaken by using affinity binding followed by mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS). The analysis of the proteins bound to magnetic beads coated with collagen I revealed 2 major bands (65 kDa and 15 kDa, Fig. 5) in both strains tested

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Silver staining of C. jejuni Co-IP eluate; 1, pre-stained ladder (Page ruler plus); 2, 11168H eluate after 1 hour incubation; 3, 11168H eluate after 3 hour incubation; 4, 81–176 eluate after 1 hour incubation; 5, 81–176 eluate after 3 hour incubation.

Analysis of these bands using mass spectrometry identified the top (65 kDa) bands in both strains as flagellin subunits (FlaA and FlaB). Larger observed sizes of these proteins, when compared with those predicted from their amino acid sequences (60 kDa), are likely to be a result of O-linked glycosylation.14 Indeed, it was reported that the molecular mass of flagellin of strain 81–176 as determined by gel electrophoresis was about 65 kDa, larger than that was predicted from its amino acid sequence.15 Slight difference in gel mobilities between flagellins from these 2 strains, as observed in Fig. 5 can also be explained by strain to strain variation in glycosylation pattern.

L. fermentum 3872 inhibits C. jejuni growth by production of acidic environment

Cell-free supernatants of L. fermentum inhibited the growth of C. jejuni (Fig. 6). Adjustment of the supernatant pH (normally about 4.2) to 6.3 abolished inhibition zone, suggesting that it was the acid environment that was causing the inhibitory effect. Acidification of the media is commonly attributed to the release of lactic acid by these bacteria. On the other hand, heat treatment had no effect on the inhibition zone (Fig. 6) indicating the absence of heat labile compounds involved in growth inhibition. The results suggest that the main anti-Campylobacter activity is associated with acidification of the environment.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of growth of C. jejuni strains 81–176 (A) and 11168H (B) in the presence of cell-free L. fermentum 3872 culture supernatant; 1, M.R.S broth (control); 2–4, L. fermentum 3872 cell-free supernatant; 2, untreated; 3, heat-treated; 4, pH adjusted. Three biologic repeats were performed.

Discussion and conclusion

The results of this study suggest that L. fermentum and Campylobacter jejuni may exploit the same host cell receptor for attachment and colonisation. We demonstrated the molecular mechanism of such interaction and identified the adhesins required for binding of these bacteria to collagen receptor. As adhesion is important for C. jejuni host colonisation and infection,16 competition for adhesion to collagen I may be a viable means of reducing pathogen load in hosts and thus preventing C. jejuni infection. Interestingly, whole cell ELISA experiments indicated an increase in absorbance of C. jejuni being detected when using lower amounts of L. fermentum 3872. Potential reasoning for the latter observation could be explained by possible auto-aggregation of C. jejuni or co-aggregation between C. jejuni and L. fermentum 3872. Co-aggregation between C. jejuni and other species of Lactobacilli has previously been reported.17 In vitro experiments demonstrated that the presence of probiotics can lead to co-aggregation with C. jejuni and inhibition of adhesion of the latter to human epithelial cells.18

The ability of probiotic bacteria to cause aggregation of (or co-aggregation with) C. jejuni cells and inhibit their binding to host cells may work synergistically with other antibacterial factors. In particular, higher gastric acidity was found to reduce the likelihood of C. jejuni infection.19 This is supported by our study demonstrating that acidification of the environment caused by Lactobacillus fermentum represents a strong antibacterial factor. Co-aggregation may further assist in the antagonistic action of lactobacilli by reducing the distance between the probiotic cells and the pathogen.17 Utilization of multiple antagonisitic factors would elevate the effect of probiotics in inhibiting a pathogen, and reduce the risk of developing of antimicrobial resistance.

According to our data, C. jejuni flagellin binds to collagen I, supporting other data on the role of flagella in adhesion.20,21 To our knowledge, this is the first study on the identification of a host cell molecule specifically interacting with bacterial flagellum. The latter is known to be modified by O-linked glycosylation, which is variable in the same strain and is also strain-dependent.22-24

Due to the extreme variability of O-linked flagella modifications and the difference between the oligosaccharide structures decorating flagellins in the 2 strains tested, the involvement of sugar residues in binding to collagen seems unlikely.

It would be interesting to investigate other putative L. fermentum 3872 adhesins predicted from its genome sequence,11 such as enolase, mucus and fibronectin binding proteins, as well as aggregation substance precursor. The results of this study warrant further investigation of antagonistic activity of this strain in poultry. Due to its anti-campylobacter activity L. fermentum 3872 could potentially be used for prophylaxis of such C. jejuni induced diseases as traveler's diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome.25,26 Although it was isolated from human milk of a healthy person9 and is predicted to be generally safe, trial experiments are required to confirm its safety. Adhesion experiments using epithelial cell lines could be performed to determine competition between CBP or L. fermentum 3872 and C. jejuni. Furthermore, due to the presence of other genes encoding putative collagen-binding proteins such as enolase, cbp gene knockout experiments could be performed to determine the extent to which CBP plays a role in collagen adhesion for L. fermentum 3872. The experiments described in this study may also be conducted with other pathogenic bacteria, such as e.g. Staphylococci which utilize adhesion to collagen for host colonisation.27 With an increasing understanding of the mechanisms of interaction and competition between bacteria, a wide variety of tools may be developed for anti-microbial purposes, reducing our dependence on antibiotics and widening our means in combatting pathogenic bacteria such as C. jejuni.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

L. fermentum 3872 was grown overnight at 37°C under anaerobic conditions on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (M.R.S.) agar (Oxoid), and in M.R.S broth (Oxoid). C. jejuni 11168H is a hypermotile derivative of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 originally isolated from human faeces.22 C. jejuni 81–176 is a highly virulent strain isolated from raw milk.28 C. jejuni was grown for 24 hours at 37°C in a microaerobic incubator (Don Whitley Scientific) in an atmosphere of 10% CO2, 5% O2, N2 85% on CBA (Columbia Blood Agar Base, Oxoid) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid) and Campylobacter selective supplement Skirrow (Oxoid). E. coli was grown at 37°C overnight on LB (Luria Bertani) agar (Fisher Scientific) or in LB broth (Fisher Scientific) supplemented with chloramphenicol at 25 µg/ml where appropriate, e.g., for expression of CBP (see below).

Cloning and purification of CBP

The cbp gene lacking the region corresponding to the leader peptide was PCR-amplified using the following primers: CBP_Forward, ATATGCTTCTAGAAGAAGGAGGCAACAGTATGCACCATCACCATCACCATGATAGCAAGACAAATATTACTCAGAACGGTACG and CBP_Reverse, ATGAGCATGCTCAAATAGTAAATCTACTTATAACTACTAAACC. The CBP_Forward primer contained a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence, as well as a region encoding a hexa histidine tag. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted by using a Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase kit (NEB) with the following conditions: 98°C for 30 seconds for initial denaturation, 25 cycles of denaturation for 10 seconds at 98°C, annealing for 30 seconds at 55°C and extension for 4 minutes at 55°C, and a final extension at 72°C for 2 minutes.

The PCR product was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen), digested with enzymes XbaI and SphI (NEB) and cloned into expression vector pBAD3329 using Quick Ligation kit (NEB) and E. coli Express competent cells (NEB).

Sanger sequencing, conducted by GENEWIZ revealed no errors in the cloned fragment.

For protein expression, 10 ml of the overnight culture of bacteria containing the recombinant plasmid were inoculated into 250 ml of media, incubated at 37°C on a shaker at 120 rpm to OD600 of 0.6 and induced with L-arabinose (ACROS organics) at a final concentration of 0.1% for 3 hours. The protein was purified using a Clonetech His60 protein purification column. The concentration of protein was determined using a Pierce BCA protein assay kit.

Samples were analyzed on NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis-tris gel (ThermoFisher Scientific) after mixing with1X NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) and incubation at 70°C for 10 minutes, as recommended by the manufacturer. Electrophoresis was conducted using 1X NuPAGE MOPS SDS running buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1 hour at 150 V. The samples were stained using Invitrogen Coomassie Simply Blue Safe stain (ThermoFisher Scientific). Equivalent amounts of samples in relation to the number of cells were loaded onto each well. Silver staining was conducted using the Pierce silver stain kit for mass spectrometry (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the standard manufacturer's protocol. The molecular marker used for Coomassie staining was PageRuler Plus Prestained protein ladder (ThermoFisher Scientific) diluted to 1:10 in 1X NuPAGE LDS buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific). For Silver staining the PageRuler Plus Prestained protein ladder (ThermoFisher Scientific) was diluted to 1:100 in 1X NuPAGE LDS buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Calf skin collagen I (Sigma) was dissolved in 0.1M acetic acid (Fisher Scientific) to a stock concentration of 1 mg/ml. Transparent Corning Costar 96 well flat bottom non-treated polystyrene plates were coated with 0.36 µg/well calf skin collagen I (Sigma) or BSA (Sigma) in ELISA coating buffer (0.19 g Na2CO3, 0.37 g NaHCO3 in 125 ml dH2O; pH 9.6). The plates were incubated at 4°C overnight. For washing steps, 200 µl/well PBS with 0.1%Tween 20 (PBST) was used. After coating, the plates were washed twice with PBST and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 2% BSA (Sigma) in PBS (200 µl/well). Wells were washed 3 times with PBST and 100 µl/well of samples were added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. If bacteria were used, the samples were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Wells were washed 4 times with PBST. One hundred microliters of the primary antibody (1:1000 dilution in PBS containing 0.05% Tween20 (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml BSA (Sigma)) were added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. Wells were washed 4 times with PBST and 100 µl of an appropriate secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution in PBS containing 0.05% tween 20 (Sigma) and 3% BSA (Sigma)) was added, followed by incubation for 1 hour at 37°C. Wells were washed 4 times with PBST and incubated with a 100 µl of 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine substrate (Sigma) for 15 minutes. Fifty µl/well of 1M H2SO4 were added to stop the reaction. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a Tecan Infinite M200 Pro microplate reader.

For C. jejuni binding and CBP/C.jejuni competition assays, Campylobacter jejuni monoclonal primary antibody (Bio-Rad) and goat anti-mouse polyclonal secondary antibody (Bio-Rad) were used. For CBP binding assay, Pierce 6x-His Epitope Tag monoclonal primary antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific), and anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Polyclonal secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) were used.For whole cell competition assay anti-Campylobacter jejuni (PEB1), polyclonal primary antibody (Antibodies-Online) and Goat-anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal secondary antibody HRP conjugate (SAB) were used.

Binding and competition assay

For binding assay, CBP stock was diluted in PBS. The samples were added to collagen I coated wells. BSA-coated wells were used as negative controls. For C. jejuni attachment studies the wells coated with collagen I were incubated with a 100 µl of bacterial suspensions made to an OD600 of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 in PBS. The final amounts of C. jejuni cells added to each well were 2 × 108 cfu/well, 2 × 107 cfu/well and 2 × 106 cfu/well respectively. BSA-coated wells were used as negative controls. For whole cell competition assay, L. fermentum 3872 bacterial suspension was made to an OD600 of 0.5 (1 × 108 cfu/ml), 1 (2 × 108 cfu/ml), 5 (1 × 109 cfu/ml), and 9 (2 × 109 cfu/ml) by mixing with C. jejuni to have a final bacterial suspension of OD600 0.1 (2 × 108 cfu/ml) in PBS. A hundred microliters of the mixture was added to each well. This resulted in a final ratio of L. fermentum 3872 to C. jejuni of 1:2, 1:1, 5:1 and 10:1 respectively. For competition assays involving CBP and C. jejuni, collagen I or BSA coated wells were incubated with a mixture of 2 µg/well CBP and 2 × 107 cfu/well C. jejuni in PBS.

Agar well diffusion assay

Agar well diffusion assay was used to determine anti-C. jejuni activity.18 C. jejuni suspensions were adjusted to an OD600 of 1 in PBS, of which 300 µl were added to 15 ml of soft (0.75%) Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar at 41°C. Soft agar was prepared by mixing MH broth (Fluka) to 0.75% agar (Fluka). The inoculated molten agar was overlaid over 20 ml MH agar. L. fermentum 3872 was cultured overnight in M.R.S broth at 37°C under anaerobic condition and filter sterilised using a 0.22 µm filter (Fisher Scientific). The cell-free culture supernatant was either boiled at 100°C for 5 minutes, or the pH was adjusted to that of the M.R.S broth (6.3) using NaOH (Sigma). Four 10 mm wells were cut in the MH agar after inoculating with C. jejuni. The wells were filled with 300 µl of one of the following 1) MH broth, 2) cell-free 3872 culture supernatant 3) boiled cell-free 3872 culture supernatant, or 4) cell-free 3872 culture supernatant with adjusted pH.

Co-Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry

Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) was conducted using Dynabeads Co-Immunoprecipitation kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) to determine collagen I binding proteins expressed by C. jejuni 11168H and 81–176. Dynabeads were coated with 15 µg of collagen I (15 µg of collagen per 1 mg of Dynabeads). Standard manufacturer's protocol was followed. C. jejuni suspension was made to an OD600 of 1 in 20 ml of PBS. The cell suspension was spun down at 3200 g for 10 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant was removed and the bacteria pellet was weighed. Lysis buffer was prepared using 1X IP buffer provided by the Dynabeads Co-Immunoprecipitation kit (ThermoFisher Scientific), 100mM NaCl (Sigma) and 5 µl DNase I (Promega) in dH2O. The bacterial pellet was lysed in a 1:9 ratio of cell weight to volume and incubated on ice for 10 minutes. To ensure complete lysis, bacterial lysates were sonicated (Soniprep 159) for 10 cycles with 10 seconds sonication and 30 seconds rest, to complete lysis. After sonication, the samples were spun at 3200 g for 5 minutes. The clarified lysates were incubated at room temperature with 2 mg of collagen I coupled Dynabeads on a rotator (30 rpm) for 1 and 3 hours. Standard manufacturer's protocol was followed for protein elution. Prior to mass spectrometry, Pierce silver stain kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to detect protein bands (see above). Bands were cut out using a scalpel and placed into an Eppendorf tube with 50 µl of dH2O. Mass spectrometry was conducted by the Cambridge Center for Proteomics (United Kingdom). Mascot server was used for the identification of proteins using Genbank data of the respective C. jejuni strains.

Statistical analysis

ELISA readings were adjusted by subtracting values of relevant controls. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. On ELISA graphs the P variances are labeled by stars according to the following scheme: * for 0.005<p≤ 0.05, ** for 0.001<p≤ 0.005 and *** for p≤ 0.001. The vertical bars on the diagrams represent SEMs (standard errors of the mean).

Supplementary Material

KVIR_S_1362533.zip

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the Cambridge center of proteomics for conducting mass spectrometry, Dr Ali Ryan for providing access to the Tecan Infinite M200 Pro microplate reader and the Sonicprep 159 sonicator, Ana Vieira and Amritha Ramesh for providing C. jejuni stocks used for this study.

References

  • [1].Saint-Cyr M, Guyard- Nicodeme M, Messaoudi S, Chemaly M, Cappelier J, Dousset X, Haddad N. Recent advances in screening of anti-campylobacter activity in probiotics for use in poultry. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:553. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00553. PMID:27303366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Acheson D, Allos BM. Campylobacter jejuni infections: Update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(8):1201-6. doi: 10.1086/319760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hussain I, Shahid Mahmood M, Akhtar M, Khan A. Prevalence of Campylobacter species in meat, milk and other food commodities in pakistan. Food Microbiol. 2007;24(3):219-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.06.001. PMID:17188200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, Basham D, Chillingworth T, Davies RM, Feltwell T, Holroyd S, et al.. The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000;403(6770):665-8. doi: 10.1038/35001088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Adak GK, Meakins SM, Yip H, Lopman BA, O'Brien S, J. Disease risks from foods, England and wales, 1996–2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(3):365-72. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040191. PMID:15757549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Economou V, Gousia P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infect Drug Resist. 2015;8:49-61. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S55778. PMID:25878509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].World Health Organisation (WHO) Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. 2017. http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Oelschlaeger TA. Mechanisms of probiotic actions – A review. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.005. PMID:19783474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Abramov VM, Khlebnikov VS, Pchelintsev SJ, Kosarev IV, Karlyshev AV, Vasilenko RN, Melnikov VG. Strain of Lactobacillus fermentum having broad spectrum of antagonistic activity and probiotic lactobacterium consortium for manufacturing bacterial preparations. Patent RU2528862C1, C12N-1/20, A61K-35/74, A23C-9/123, C12R-1/225, Application 2013118084/10, priority 19.04.2013, publication 20.09.2014, Russian Federation, https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2528862C1/en. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lehri B, Seddon AM, Karlyshev AV. Lactobacillus fermentum 3872 genome sequencing reveals plasmid and chromosomal genes potentially involved in a probiotic activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362(11):fnv068. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Lehri B, Seddon AM, Karlyshev AV. Potential probiotic-associated traits revealed from completed high quality genome sequence of Lactobacillus fermentum 3872. Stand Genomic Sci. 2017;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40793-017-0228-4. PMID:28163828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].MFVd Mello, A Pissinatti, Ferreira AMR. Distribution of collagen types I, III, and IV in gastric tissue of marmosets (Callithrix spp., Callitrichidae: Primates). Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira 2010;30:317-20. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2010000400006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Rath A, Glibowicka M, Nadeau VG, Chen G, Deber CM. Detergent binding explains anomalous SDS-PAGE migration of membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(6):1760-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813167106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hitchen P, Brzostek J, Panico M, Butler JA, Morris HR, Dell A, Linton D. Modification of the Campylobacter jejuni flagellin glycan by the product of the Cj1295 homopolymeric-tract-containing gene. Microbiology. 2010;156:1953-62. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.038091-0. PMID:20338909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Thibault P, Logan SM, Kelly JF, Brisson J, Ewing CP, Trust TJ, Guerry P. Identification of the carbohydrate moieties and glycosylation motifs in Campylobacter jejuni flagellin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(37):34862-70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104529200. PMID:11461915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Lee S, Lee J, Ha J, Choi Y, Kim S, Lee H, Yoon Y, Choi K. Clinical relevance of infections with zoonotic and human oral species of Campylobacter. J Microbiol. 2016;54(7):459-67. doi: 10.1007/s12275-016-6254-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Tareb R, Bernardeau M, Gueguen M, Vernoux J. In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria, especially Campylobacter jejuni. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(4):637-49. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.049965-0. PMID:23329323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Nishiyama K, Seto Y, Yoshioka K, Kakuda T, Takai S, Yamamoto Y, Mukai T. Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 reduces infection by and colonization of Campylobacter jejuni. Plos One. 2014;9(9):e108827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108827. PMID:25264604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Moore JE, Corcoran D, James S.G. Dooley, Seamus Fanning, Lucey B, Matsuda M, McDowell DA, Francis Megraud, Cherie Millar B, Rebecca O'Mahony, et al.. Campylobacter. Vet Res. 2005;36(3):351-82. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Haiko J, Westerlund-Wikstrom B. The role of the bacterial flagellum in adhesion and virulence. Biology. 2013;2(4):1242-67. doi: 10.3390/biology2041242. PMID:24833223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Newell DG, McBride H, Dolby JM. Investigations on the role of flagella in the colonization of infant mice with Campylobacter jejuni and attachment of Campylobacter jejuni to human epithelial cell lines. J Hyg. 1985;95(2):217-27. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400062653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Karlyshev AV, Linton D, Gregson NA, Wren BW. A novel paralogous gene family involved in phase-variable flagella-mediated motility in Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology. 2002;148(2):473-80. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-473. PMID:11832511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ewing CP, Andreishcheva E, Guerry P. Functional characterization of flagellin glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni 81–176. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(22):7086-93. doi: 10.1128/JB.00378-09. PMID:19749047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Zebian N, Merkx-Jacques A, Pittock PP, Houle S, Dozois CM, Lajoie GA, Creuzenet C. Comprehensive analysis of flagellin glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 reveals incorporation of legionaminic acid and its importance for host colonization. Glycobiology. 2016;26(4):386-97. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwv104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Kaakoush NO, Castano-Rodriguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):687-720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. PMID:26062576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zenner D, Gillespie I. Travel-associated Salmonella and Campylobacter gastroenteritis in England: Estimation of under-ascertainment through national laboratory surveillance. J Travel Med. 2011;18(6):414-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2011.00553.x. PMID:22017719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Ponnuraj K, Bowden MG, Davis S, Gurusiddappa S, Moore D, Choe D, Xu Y, Hook M, Narayana SVL. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a Staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell. 2003;115(2):217-28. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00809-2. PMID:14567919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Hu L, Kopecko DJ. Campylobacter jejuni 81–176 associates with microtubules and dynein during invasion of human intestinal cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67(8):4171-82. PMID:10417189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Guzman LM, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(14):4121-30. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

KVIR_S_1362533.zip
kvir-08-08-1362533-s001.zip (2.4MB, zip)

Articles from Virulence are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES