Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Immunology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Immunology
letter
. 2017 Sep 11;15(2):182–184. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2017.92

Multi-epitope vaccines: a promising strategy against tumors and viral infections

Lifang Zhang 1,*
PMCID: PMC5811687  PMID: 28890542

Immune responses play a critical role in fighting tumors and viral infections. An antigenic epitope is a basic unit that elicits either a cellular or a humoral immune response. A multi-epitope vaccine composed of a series of or overlapping peptides is therefore an ideal approach for the prevention and treatment of tumors or viral infections.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Although some multi-epitope vaccines have entered phase I clinical trials, for example, EMD640744 in patients with advanced solid tumors,6 designing efficacious multi-epitope vaccines remains a great challenge. An ideal multi-epitope vaccine should be designed to include epitopes that can elicit CTL, Th and B cells and induce effective responses against a targeted tumor or virus (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The molecular and cellular mechanism of immune responses induced by a multi-epitope vaccine. Multi-epitope vaccines can be composed of CTL, Th and B-cell epitopes in a series or overlapping epitope peptides. Through TCR, CD8+ precursor CTL (CD8+ pCTL) recognizes the complex of CTL antigen peptides bound to MHC class I molecules that are displayed by target cells (tumor cells or virus-infected cells). Antigen presenting cells (APC) take up the multi-epitope vaccine and present the Th antigen peptides bound to MHC class II molecules to Th0 cells. Th0 cells are differentiated into Th1, Th2 and CD4+ CTL cells. Th1 cells secrete cytokines that stimulate CD8+ pCTL to generate effector CTL cells, the latter of which will kill the target cells by both the perforin/granzyme and the Fas/FasL pathways. Th2 cells recognize the Th epitope bound to MHC class II molecules that are presented by B cells. After being activated, Th2 cells express CD40L molecules and secrete cytokines to stimulate B-cell activation; CD4+ CTL cells secrete cytotoxins, directly killing the target cells by releasing granules containing perforin and granzyme B. B cells recognize and take up the B epitopes of the multi-epitope vaccine by BCR, presenting the Th epitopes bound to MHC class II molecules to activate Th2 cells. The B cells then proliferate and differentiate into plasma cells after binding to the CD40L molecules and cytokines provided by activated Th2 cells. The plasma cells secrete multi-epitope vaccine-specific antibodies to perform anti-tumor or anti-virus tasks in target cells by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC).

Compared to classical vaccines and single-epitope vaccines, multi-epitope vaccines have unique design concepts4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 with the following properties: (I) they consist of multiple MHC-restricted epitopes that can be recognized by TCRs of multiple clones from various T-cell subsets; (II) they consist of CTL, Th and B-cell epitopes that can induce strong cellular and humoral immune responses simultaneously; (III) they consist of multiple epitopes from different tumor or virus antigens that can expand the spectra of targeted tumors or viruses; (IV) they introduce some components with adjuvant capacity that can enhance the immunogenicity and long-lasting immune responses; and (V) they reduce unwanted components that can trigger either pathological immune responses or adverse effects. Well-designed multi-epitope vaccines with such advantages should become powerful prophylactic and therapeutic agents against tumors and viral infections.

Current problems in the field of multi-epitope vaccine design and development include the selection of appropriate candidate antigens and their immunodominant epitopes and the development of an effective delivery system. Development of a successful multi-epitope vaccine first depends on the selection of appropriate candidate antigens and their immunodominant epitopes. The prediction of appropriate antigenic epitopes of a target protein by immunoinformatic methods is extremely important for designing a multi-epitope vaccine.12, 13 In our laboratory, we always use immunoinformatic tools to predict and screen the immunogenic T- and B-cell epitopes of the target antigens, then design peptides rich in epitopes or overlapping epitopes.7, 8, 11, 14, 15 For the prediction of B-cell epitopes, multiple alignments of the target antigen are initially carried out using software from the European Bioinformatics Institute website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2). Then, the structure, hydrophilicity and flexibility, and transmembrane domains of the target antigen are predicted and analyzed by methods including GOR,16 Hoop and Woods17 and artificial neural network (http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de). Antigenic propensity value is further evaluated using the Kolaskar and Tongaonkar approach (http://bio.dfci.harvard.edu/Tools/antigenic.pl). Finally, the B-cell-dominant epitope is determined by comprehensive analysis and comparison, and T-cell epitopes including MHC-I restriction CTL and MHC-restriction Th epitopes are predicted using the SYFPEITHI network database (http://www.syfpeithi.de/Scripts/MHCServer.dll/EpitopePrediction.htm). All the above-mentioned programs are provided on the EXPASY server (http://www.expasy.org/tools). Recently, we have developed a multi-epitope vaccine, named EBV LMP2m, which encodes multiple CTL, Th and B epitopes from the EBV LMP2 gene.11 Expression of the recombinant multi-epitope protein from the constructed multi-epitope vaccine gene was optimized to maximize its production in E. coli. The specific CTL and Th cell reactions and B-cell activation (serum-specific IgG and mucosal IgA antibodies) were analyzed in BALB/c mice immunized with the multi-epitope vaccine. The multi-epitope-specific serum antibodies in patients with EBV-related tumors (nasopharyngeal carcinoma) or EBV infection were analyzed using ELISA and western blotting. All the analyses demonstrated that the multi-epitope vaccine EBV LMP2m had a very high immunogenicity. Therefore, EBV LMP2m could be considered as a potential vaccine candidate and diagnostic agent.

The successful immunotherapy of a multi-epitope vaccine is also associated with an effective vaccine delivery system. At present, both virus-like particles (VLPs)7, 8, 14 and nanoparticles18, 19 have been used as vehicles for delivering multi-epitope vaccines. We have used two types of VLPs: hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg)-VLPs and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-VLPs. Our data have shown that either HBcAg or HBsAg-VLPs multi-epitope vaccines strongly elicit specifically humoral and cellular immune responses and generate vigorous immune responses of the individual epitopes carried by the multi-epitope vaccine.7, 8, 14

In summary, multi-epitope vaccines can be considered as a promising strategy against tumors and viral infections. Immunoinformatics methods can help to predict and screen appropriate epitopes for designing an efficacious multi-epitope vaccine. Both VLPs and nanoparticles used for delivering a multi-epitope vaccine could increase its immunogenicity.

Footnotes

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Buonaguro L. HEPAVAC consortium. Developments in cancer vaccines for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2016; 65: 93–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennick CA, George MM, Corwin WL, Srivastava PK, Ebrahimi-Nik H. Neoepitopes as cancer immunotherapy targets: key challenges and opportunities. Immunotherapy 2017; 9: 361–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuo T, Wang C, Badakhshan T, Chilukuri S, BenMohamed L. The challenges and opportunities for the development of a T-cell epitope-based herpes simplex vaccine. Vaccine 2014; 32: 6733–6745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. He R, Yang X, Liu C, Chen X, Wang L, Xiao M et al. Efficient control of chronic LCMV infection by a CD4 T cell epitope-based heterologous prime-boost vaccination in a murine model. Cell Mol Immunol 2017; e-pub ahead of print 13 March 2017; doi:10.1038/cmi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Lu IN, Farinelle S, Sausy A, Muller CP. Identification of a CD4 T-cell epitope in the hemagglutinin stalk domain of pandemic H1N1 influenza virus and its antigen-driven TCR usage signature in BALB/c mice. Cell Mol Immunol 2017; 14: 511–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lennerz V, Gross S, Gallerani E, Sessa C, Mach N, Boehm S et al. Immunologic response to the survivin-derived multi-epitope vaccine EMD640744 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2014; 63: 381–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang P, Cai Y, Chen J, Ye X, Mao S, Zhu S et al. Evaluation of tamdem Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP multi-epitopes vaccine in BALB/c mice model. Vaccine 2017; 35: 3096–3103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhu S, Feng Y, Rao P, Xue X, Chen S, Li W et al. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen as delivery vector can enhance Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP multi-epitope immune response in mice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 98: 4107–4117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saadi M, Karkhah A, Nouri HR. Development of a multi-epitope peptide vaccine inducing robust T cell responses against brucellosis using immunoinformatics based approaches. Infect Genet Evol 2017; 51: 227–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu C, Meng S, Jin Y, Zhang W, Li Z, Wang F et al. A novel multi-epitope vaccine from MMSA-1 and DKK1 for multiple myeloma immunotherapy. Br J Haematol 2017; 178: 413–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin X, Chen S, Xue X, Lu L, Zhu S, Li W et al. Chimerically fused antigen rich of overlapped epitopes from latent membrane protein 2 (LMP2) of Epstein-Barr virus as a potential vaccine and diagnostic agent. Cell Mol Immunol 2016; 13: 492–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yin D, Li L, Song X, Li H, Wang J, Ju W et al. A novel multi-epitope recombined protein for diagnosis of human brucellosis. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16: 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cherryholmes GA, Stanton SE, Disis ML. Current methods of epitope identification for cancer vaccine design. Vaccine 2015; 33: 7408–7414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang P, Du W, Xiong Y, Lv Y, Feng J, Zhu S et al. Hepatitis B virus core antigen as a carrier for Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP multi-epitope peptide enhances protection against genital chlamydial infection. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 43281–43292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shen X, Jin J, Ding Y, Wang P, Wang A, Xiao D et al. Novel immunodominant epitopes derived from MAGE-A3 and its significance in serological diagnosis of gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013; 139: 1529–1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garnier J, Gibrat JF, Robson B. GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence. Methods Enzymol 1996; 266: 540–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoop TP, Woods KR. Prediction of antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 3824–3828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuai R, Ochyl LJ, Bahjat KS, Schwendeman A, Moon JJ. Designer vaccine nanodiscs for personalized cancer immunotherapy. Nat Mater 2017; 16: 489–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Alipour Talesh G, Ebrahimi Z, Badiee A, Mansourian M, Attar H, Arabi L et al. Poly (I:C)-DOTAP cationic nanoliposome containing multi-epitope HER2-derived peptide promotes vaccine-elicited anti-tumor immunity in a murine model. Immunol Lett 2016; 176: 57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Immunology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES