Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;9(5):6188–6200. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23486

Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis of the impact of RBM3 median protein expression on overall and recurrence free survival according to adjuvant treatment.

Death within 5 years Recurrence
HR (95% CI) n (events, %) p† HR (95% CI) n (events, %) p†
All
No adjuvant treatment
RBM3 low 1.00 48 (29, 60.4%) 1 48 (26, 54.2%)
RBM3 high 1.85 (1.12–3.06) 43 (33, 76.7%) 2.00 (1.20–3.33) 43 (34, 79.1%)
2.04 (1.14–3.67) 2.12 (1.13–3.96)
Any adjuvant treatment* 0.003 0.009
RBM3 low 1 35 (27, 77.1%) 1 35 (28, 80.0%)
RBM3 high 0.60 (0.34–1.05) 40 (22, 55.0%) 0.76 (0.45–1.29) 40 (28, 70.0%)
0.24 (0.12–0.49) 0.31 (0.16–0.59)
Pancreatobiliary type
No adjuvant treatment
RBM3 low 1 22 (14, 63.6%) 1 22 (13, 59.1%)
RBM3 high 2.49 (1.27–4.86) 26 (24, 92.3%) 2.86 (1.45–5.65) 26 (26, 100%)
4.25 (1.52–11.87) 2.13 (0.81–5.64)
Any adjuvant treatment* < 0.001 < 0.001
RBM3 low 1 24 (22, 91.7%) 1 24 (22, 91.7%)
RBM3 high 0.45 (0.24–0.85) 33 (21, 63.6%) 0.60 (0.33–1.06) 33 (26, 78.8%)
0.41 (0.21–0.80) 0.36 (0.19–0.69)

Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender, tumor origin, tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, differentiation grade, involved margins, lymphatic growth, vascular growth, perineural growth and growth in peripancreatic fat.

p value for term of interaction by Cox multivariable analysis including treatment, the binary covariate RBM3 expression, any vs no treatment and a term of interaction.

*The majority of patients received gemcitabine alone (n = 51 and n = 44, respectively) or in combination (n = 6 and n = 4, respectively).