Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Feb 15;6(7):e01585-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01585-17

High-Quality Draft Genome Sequences of Five Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae Isolates

Michael Gétaz a, Steve Baeyen b, Jochen Blom c, Martine Maes b, Bart Cottyn b, Joël F Pothier a,
PMCID: PMC5814503  PMID: 29449402

ABSTRACT

Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae was described in 2001 as the causal agent of strawberry bacterial leaf blight. We report here the first draft whole-genome sequences of five X. arboricola pv. fragariae isolates from Italy and France.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae was described in 2001 as the causal agent of strawberry bacterial leaf blight (1). The first symptoms related to this bacterium were observed in 1993 in strawberry cultivations in northern Italy (1). Afterward, the disease has only been reported in plantlets from Turkey in 2004 (2). The bacterium was under quarantine status in Europe starting in 2002 (3), but it was derestricted in 2007 (see https://www.eppo.int/MEETINGS/2007_meetings/phytomeasures.htm). This was partly due to the observation that the pathogen was sometimes coisolated with Xanthomonas fragariae (4, 5), which is the causal agent of bacterial angular leaf spot and is under quarantine status in Europe (6, 7). Also, the reported pathogenicity of X. arboricola pv. fragariae upon artificial inoculation on strawberry has often been ambiguous (4, 5, 8; M. Gétaz and J. F. Pothier, unpublished data). This could be related to the important heterogeneity among X. arboricola pv. fragariae strains, as observed in previous studies (4, 5, 911). Very recently, the pathogenicity of the pathotype strain was proved to produce typical symptoms in the strawberry cultivars Candonga, Sabrina, and Murano (12).

Until now, no whole-genome data for this bacterium were available in GenBank. In this study, whole-genome sequences of five X. arboricola pv. fragariae strains isolated from strawberry plants in Italy and France between 1986 and 1993 were obtained (Table 1).

TABLE 1 .

Draft whole-genome sequences of five Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae strains submitted to the ENA database

Straina Synonym(s) Yr, country of
isolation
ENA accession no. No. of
contigs
Genome
size (bp)
G+C
content (%)
No. of
CDSs
LMG 19145b CFBP 6771, PD 2780 1993, Italy OEQL00000000 39 4,906,785 65.88 4,019
LMG 19144 CFBP 6770, PD 2696 1993, Italy OEQF00000000 58 4,842,182 65.94 3,954
CFBP 6762 PD 2694 1993, Italy OEQE00000000 38 4,889,284 65.75 4,044
LMG 19146 CFBP 3548, PD 3164 1986, France OEQG00000000 39 4,884,039 65.75 4,020
CFBP 6773 NAc NA OEQD00000000 39 4,692,498 65.95 3,852
a

The culture collections providing strains are abbreviated in the strain names as LMG (Collection of the Laboratorium voor Microbiologie en Microbiele Genetica, Ghent, Belgium), CFBP (Collection Française de Bactéries Associées aux Plantes, Beaucouzé, France), or PD (Culture Collection of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Wageningen, the Netherlands).

b

Pathotype strain.

c

NA, not applicable.

Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel AG, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Paired-end libraries constructed by the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) were sequenced on a MiSeq system (Illumina) using a 600-cycle MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina). De novo assemblies were created using SeqMan NGen from the Lasergene genomics package version 12.1.0 (DNAStar, Madison, WI). This was followed by contig reassembly using SeqMan Pro and read mapping using SeqMan NGen to check for inconsistencies.

The five genomes displayed an overall size between 4,692,498 and 4,906,785 bp, which is in the range previously observed with other X. arboricola genomes (1317). The G+C contents in all the genomes were similar (65.75 to 65.95%). Genomes were annotated automatically using GenDB (18), and a total of 3,852 to 4,044 coding sequences (CDSs) were detected (Table 1). Using EDGAR 2.0 (19), a total of 3,523 CDSs were found to be shared between these five genomes.

Average nucleotide identities (ANIs) between these five genomes ranged from 96.57% to 97.69%, thus confirming the species designation but also suggesting some genome content heterogeneity.

The X. arboricola pv. fragariae draft genome sequences presented here add to the existing genomic information and further clarify the complexity of the species X. arboricola.

Accession number(s).

The annotated draft whole-genome sequences of the five X. arboricola pv. fragariae isolates were deposited at ENA under the sequencing project number PRJEB23514. The accession numbers for the isolates are shown in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are thankful to Marilena Palmisano for her assistance in the lab.

The EDGAR platform is funded by BMBF grant FKZ 031A533. This research project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement 613678 (DROPSA). This article is based on work from European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST.

Footnotes

Citation Gétaz M, Baeyen S, Blom J, Maes M, Cottyn B, Pothier JF. 2018. High-quality draft genome sequences of five Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae isolates. Genome Announc 6:e01585-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01585-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Janse JD, Rossi MP, Gorkink RFJ, Derks JHJ, Swings J, Janssens D, Scortichini M. 2001. Bacterial leaf blight of strawberry (Fragaria (x) ananassa) caused by a pathovar of Xanthomonas arboricola, not similar to Xanthomonas fragariae Kennedy & King. Description of the causal organism as Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae (pv. nov., comb. nov.). Plant Pathol 50:653–665. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00644.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ustun N, Tjou-Tam-Sin NNA, Janse JD. 2007. First report on bacterial leaf blight of strawberry caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae Janse et al. in Turkey. J Plant Pathol 89:109–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anonymous. 2002. A new pathogen, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae, causing bacterial leaf blight of strawberry: addition to the EPPO Alert List. OEPP/EPPO Reporting Serv 2012(4):10–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scortichini M, Rossi MP. 2003. Genetic diversity of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae strains and comparison with some other X. arboricola pathovars using repetitive PCR genomic fingerprinting. J Phytopathol 151:113–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00591.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vandroemme J, Cottyn B, Pothier JF, Pflüger V, Duffy B, Maes M. 2013. Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae: what’s in a name? Plant Pathol 62:1123–1131. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anonymous. 1986. Xanthomonas fragariae Kennedy & King. EPPO Bull 16:17–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.European Union 2000. Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the community of organisms harmful to plants and plant products and their spread within the community. Council of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merda D, Bonneau S, Guimbaud J-F, Durand K, Brin C, Boureau T, Lemaire C, Jacques M-A, Fischer-Le Saux M. 2016. Recombination-prone bacterial strains form a reservoir from which epidemic clones emerge in agroecosystems. Environ Microbiol Rep 8:572–581. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hajri A, Pothier JF, Fischer-Le Saux M, Bonneau S, Poussier S, Boureau T, Duffy B, Manceau C. 2012. Type three effector gene distribution and sequence analysis provide new insights into the pathogenicity of plant-pathogenic Xanthomonas arboricola. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:371–384. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06119-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cesbron S, Pothier J, Gironde S, Jacques MA, Manceau C. 2014. Development of multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for Xanthomonas arboricola pathovars. J Microbiol Methods 100:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fischer-Le Saux M, Bonneau S, Essakhi S, Manceau C, Jacques MA. 2015. Aggressive emerging pathovars of Xanthomonas arboricola represent widespread epidemic clones distinct from poorly pathogenic strains, as revealed by multilocus sequence typing. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:4651–4668. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00050-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ferrante P, Scortichini M. 2017. Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae: a confirmation of the pathogenicity of the pathotype strain. Eur J Plant Pathol doi: 10.1007/s10658-017-1326-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ibarra Caballero J, Zerillo MM, Snelling J, Boucher C, Tisserat N. 2013. Genome sequence of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. corylina, isolated from Turkish filbert in Colorado. Genome Announc 1:e00246-00213. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00246-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Garita-Cambronero J, Sena-Vélez M, Palacio-Bielsa A, Cubero J. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni, strain Xap33, causal agent of bacterial spot disease on almond. Genome Announc 2:e00440-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00440-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ignatov AN, Kyrova EI, Vinogradova SV, Kamionskaya AM, Schaad NW, Luster DG. 2015. Draft genome sequence of Xanthomonas arboricola strain 3004, a causal agent of bacterial disease on barley. Genome Announc 3:e01572-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01572-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pereira UP, Gouran H, Nascimento R, Adaskaveg JE, Goulart LR, Dandekar AM. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis 417, a copper-resistant strain isolated from Juglans regia L. Genome Announc 3:e01126-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01126-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garita-Cambronero J, Palacio-Bielsa A, López MM, Cubero J. 2016. Draft genome sequence for virulent and avirulent strains of Xanthomonas arboricola isolated from Prunus spp. in Spain. Stand Genomic Sci 11:12. doi: 10.1186/s40793-016-0132-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, Clausen J, Kalinowski J, Linke B, Rupp O, Giegerich R, Pühler A. 2003. GenDB—an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, Juhre T, Bertelli C, Ernst C, Goesmann A. 2016. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W22–W28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES