Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Feb 17;35(2):173–180. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599089

MicroRNAs and Endometriosis: Distinguishing Drivers from Passengers in Disease Pathogenesis

Warren B Nothnick 1
PMCID: PMC5815380  NIHMSID: NIHMS941716  PMID: 28212593

Abstract

Endometriosis is a disease common in women of reproductive age, characterized by pelvic pain and infertility. Despite its prevalence, the factors and mechanisms which contribute to the development and survival of ectopic lesions remain uncertain. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNA molecules that regulate posttranscriptional gene regulation which have been proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of many diseases including that of endometriosis. This review summarizes the results of initial studies describing differentially expressed miRNAs between endometriotic lesion tissue and eutopic endometrium. Focus then moves toward discussion of studies on examining function of differentially expressed miRNAs to determine if they play a permissive role (driver of the disease) in events conducive to endometriosis progression/survival. Included in this discussion are the potential targets of these miRNAs and how their mis-expression may contribute to the disease. Limitations and challenges faced in studying miRNAs and endometriosis pathogenesis and recommendations to overcome these hurdles are presented at the end.

Keywords: endometriosis, pathogenesis, miRNA

Endometriosis Etiology and Pathogenesis

Endometriosis is a debilitating disease that affects as many as 10 to 15% of all women of reproductive age and as many as 40 to 50% of all women with infertility. The disease occurs in women of reproductive age (i.e., menstruating females) and is characterized by the major complaints of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and infertility. Endometriosis is defined as the presence of both ectopic endometrial stromal and glandular tissue. This disease is thought to develop via reverse menstruation of viable endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity.

However, because almost all women of reproductive age exhibit some degree of retrograde menstruation,1,2 it is postulated that some other factors must contribute to the development and progression of the disease. Over the course of the past 30 years, additional factors which may predispose this subset of women to developing endometriosis have been proposed. Alterations in the immune system, eutopic endometrium, and stem cell population have also been demonstrated to be altered in women with endometriosis.35 While these alterations may contribute to the development and/or progression of endometriosis, a limiting factor is the difficulty in assessing cause and effect. This holds true for examining the potential role of any factor, including mRNAs, proteins, or microRNAs. Once a factor is identified as “mis-expressed” in endometriotic tissue, studies must be conducted to determine if this mis-expression is a cause for (driver of the disease) or a result of endometriosis (passenger).

MicroRNA Biogenesis and Function

MicroRNA (MiRNAs) are a class of small noncoding regulatory RNAs that posttranscriptionally regulate gene expression.6,7 The genes which encode miRNAs reside primarily between genes (intergenic) or within introns (intronic) of genes. MiRNAs also make up the entire introns as well as reside with exons,8,9 but this occurrence is less common compared with intergenic or intronic miRNAs. MiRNA transcription is mediated by polymerase II or III as the initial long primary RNA transcript (pri-miRNA) is capped (MGpppG) and polyadenylated.10 Pri-miRNA transcript then binds with the RNA-binding protein DGCR8 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8) and the pri-miRNA–DCGR8 complex is then cleaved by Drosha (an RNAse III enzyme), yielding a stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA). The pre-miRNA is then exported from the nucleus via exportin 5 and RAN-GTP into the cytoplasm. Once in the cytoplasm, a second RNAse III enzyme, DICER, cleaves the pre-miRNA into a transient RNA duplex of approximately 18 to 25 nucleotides. Processing of all miRNAs, except miR-451,11,12 is thought to be DICER dependent.

Once processed, the miRNA duplex is cleaved, generating two strands. One strand is degraded while the remaining strand is preferentially loaded onto the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The RISC is composed of DICER, a TAR RNA-binding protein (referred to as TRBP) and one of the four different Argonaute (Argo) proteins.13 Once within the RISC, miRNAs bind to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the target mRNA transcript. If the binding of the miRNA to the 3′-UTR “seed sequence” exhibits perfect base-pairing, the mRNA transcript is degraded and mRNA translation does not occur.14 If base pair binding homology between miRNA and 3′-UTR of the mRNA is imperfect, mRNA translation is inhibited. This most likely occurs via an inhibition of translation after initiation14 or through an RISC interaction with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 (EIF6) preventing assembly of 80S ribosomes.15 More recently, miRNA regulation of transcript stability and protein translation has also been proposed to be mediated at the level of the 5′-UTR1618 as well as the DNA-coding sequence.17,18

While the majority of the literature supports the notion that miRNAs inhibit translation, there is some evidence that miRNAs can actually enhance translation through alterations in the Argo component of the RISC.7 Thus, while miRNAs appear to primarily regulate translation in an inhibitory manner, they may also enhance translation in certain biological scenarios.

miRNAs are Mis-expressed in Endometriotic Lesion Tissue

MiRNAs are postulated to play a role in normal biological processes while their mis-expression has been associated with numerous diseases.1921 The study of miRNAs and endometriosis began nearly 10 years ago with the generation and comparisons of miRNA expression profiles between eutopic endometrium and endometriotic lesion tissue. One of the first assessments of miRNA expression comparing paired eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissue was conducted in 2009.22 Fourteen upregulated and eight downregulated miRNAs specific to endometriotic lesion were identified by microarray analysis (►Table 1). In silico analysis identified 3,851 mRNA transcripts as putative targets of these 22 miRNAs. Of these predicted targets, 673 were also differentially expressed in ectopic compared with eutopic endometrial tissue, as determined by microarray. Using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software, potential molecular pathways were assessed and determined to involve c-Jun, CREB-binding protein, protein kinase B (AKT), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) signaling, all of which have previously been associated with endometriosis pathogenesis.

Table 1.

Over- and under-expressed endometriotic lesion miRNA identified by array or deep sequencing analysis

miRNA Level of expression Reference
miR-145, miR-143, miR-99a Increased (lesion/eutopic) 22
miR-99b, miR-126, miR-100,
miR-125b, miR-150, miR-125a,
miR-223, miR-194, miR-365,
miR-29c, miR-1
miR-200a, miR-141, miR-200b Decreased (lesion/eutopic) 22
miR-142-3p, miR-424, miR-34c,
miR-20a, miR-196b
miR-1, miR-100, miR-101 Increased (lesion/eutopic) 23
miR-126, miR-130a, miR-143,
miR-145, miR-148a, miR-150,
miR-186, miR-196b, miR-199a,
miR-202, miR-221, miR-28,
miR-299-5p, miR-29b, miR-29c,
miR-30e-3p, miR-30e-5p, miR-34,
miR-365, miR-368, miR-376,
miR-379, miR-411, miR-493-5p,
miR-99a
miR-106a, miR-106b, miR-130b Decreased (lesion/eutopic) 23
miR-132, miR-17-5p, miR-182,
miR-183, miR-196b, miR-200a,
miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-20a,
miR-25, miR-425-5p, miR-486,
miR-503, miR-638, miR-663,
miR-671, miR-768-3p, miR-768-5p
miR-93
let7d, let7i, miR-202, 193a-3p Increased (lesion/eutopic) 24
miR-29c, miR-708, miR-509-3-5p,
miR-574-3p, miR-193a-5p, miR-451,
miR-485-3p, miR-100, miR-720
let7a, b, c, e, f, g, h Decreased (lesion/eutopic) 24
miR-504, miR-141, miR-429,
miR-203, miR-10a, miR-200a,
miR-873, miR-200b, miR-200c,
miR-449b, miR-375, miR-34c-5p
miRPlus-F1038, miR-1915, miR-637 Increased (lesion/eutopic) 26
miR-518e*, miR-519a*, miR-519b-5p,
miR-519c-5p, miR-522*, miR-523*,
miR-574-5p, miR-615-3p, miR-1909,
miR-224*, miR-133b, miR-622,
miR-628-3p, ebv-miR-BHRF1-2, miRPlus-F1215,
miRPlus-F1221, miR-1470, miR-1469,
miR-520d-5p, miR-551b*, miR-361-3p,
miR-941, miRPlus-F1223, miR-202,
miR-663b, miRPlus-F1042, miR-381,
miR-412
miR-203, miR-425, miR-183 Decreased (lesion/eutopic) 26
miR-92a, miR-196b, miR-363*,
let-7i, miRPlus-E1031,miR-200b,
miRPlus-F1231, miR-215, miR-362-3p,
miR-342-3p, miR-200c, miR-93,
miR-24-1*, miR-25, miR-106b*
miR-106-5p, miR-142, miR-145-5p Increased (lesion/eutopic) 27
miR-16-5p, miR-181a, miR-205,
miR-663
miR-126, miR-146a-5p, miR-148a Decreased (lesion/eutopic) 27
miR-150, miR-15a-5p, miR-19b-1-5p,
miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-423,
miR-675

Note: miRNAs which have been identified as mis-expressed in more than one study are indicated in bold text.

Filigheddu and coworkers23 conducted a similar profiling experiment and compared miRNA expression between ectopic and eutopic endometrium using tissue obtained during the proliferative stage of the menstrual cycle. Fifty miRNAs were considered differentially expressed between the two tissue types (►Table 1). Again, the mis-expression of these miRNAs was postulated to allow for dysregulation of several pathways previously proposed to contribute to the pathophysiology of endometriosis, including cytokines, enzymes, growth factors, receptors, and transcription regulators. In both of these studies,22,23 six common miRNAs (miR-145, miR-143, miR-99a, miR-126, miR-100, and miR-29c) were reported as upregulated. However, there were conflicting reports on whether or not their expression was influenced by the stage of the menstrual cycle.22,23

The first transcriptome-miRNA analysis of endometriotic endometriomas (endometriotic cysts of the ovary) was conducted by Hawkins and colleagues in 2011.24 MiRNAs expressed at the highest level in endometriomas and the corresponding abundance of transcript in non-endometriosis control endometrium was determined (►Table 1). Many of the miRNAs previously reported22,23 were again identified by Hawkins and colleagues.24 This 2011 study24 was the only one of the first three studies at the time to analyze the potential function of a differentially expressed miRNA. miR-29c, which exhibited the highest expression differential between tissue types, was evaluated using primary human endometrial stromal cells in vitro.24 Putative extracellular matrix (ECM) protein gene targets of miR-29c (COL7A1, UPK1B, and TFAP2C) were downregulated in cells overexpressing miR-29c and the direct effect on the 3′-UTR of the genes was confirmed. Thus, mis-expression of miR-29c in endometriomas appears to functionally contribute to the aberrant expression of ECM proteins associated with the disease at least in isolated endometrial stromal cell culture.

More recently, Long et al25 also investigated the expression of the miR-29 family in the endometrium samples from women without endometriosis, as well as in paired ectopic and eutopic endometrium samples. As opposed to earlier studies,2224 these authors observed a decrease in lesion expression of miR-29c. The investigators further examined the role of miR-29c in endometrial cell proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis in vitro. miR-29c suppressed endometrial cell proliferation and invasion, promoting cell apoptosis. The authors concluded that miR-29c exhibits inhibitory action on endometrial cell proliferation and invasion by inhibiting the expression of c-Jun. It should be emphasized that while these investigators demonstrated a decrease in miR-29c expression in endometriotic lesion tissue which would suggest enhanced cell proliferation and invasion due to low miR-29c expression, all of the earlier reports demonstrated an increase in miR-29c expression.2224

Since these initial reports, additional studies have focused on differentially expressed miRNA between paired endometriotic lesion and eutopic endometrium. More recently, Shi and colleagues26 profiled differentially expressed miRNAs in the normal, eutopic, and ectopic endometrium using miRNA microarray screening analysis (►Table 1). Of those differentially expressed, miR-1835p was found to be downregulated in the ectopic and eutopic tissues from women with endometriosis compared with eutopic endometrium from women free of disease. Functional analysis indicated that miR-1835p may contribute to endometrial stromal cell apoptosis (but had no influence on cell proliferation) and exhibits a negative regulatory impact on the invasive ability of these cells. Stromal cell miR-183 expression was also examined in response to ovarian steroids (17β-estradiol and progesterone) and inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6). Administration of all these reagents decreased miR-183 expression. It was concluded from this study that repressed levels of miR-183 may modulate the growth and invasive potential of endometriotic endometrial stromal cells contributing to the development and progression of endometriosis.

Yang and colleagues27 used miRNA microarrays to identify differentially expressed miRNAs between endometriotic lesion tissues from women with stage III/IV disease compared with eutopic endometrium from women without endometriosis. Lesion tissue expressed significantly higher levels of expression of seven miRNAs and significantly lower levels of expression of ten miRNAs (►Table 1). Of these miRNAs, two of the upregulated miRNAs (miR-1065p and miR-165p) and six of the downregulated miRNAs (miR-126, miR-146a-5p, miR-15a-5p, miR-19b-15p, miR-200b, and miR-200c) were predicted to target key regulators of angiogenesis. Expression of VEGFA was significantly upregulated, whereas EGFR2, PTEN, and CXCR4 were markedly down-regulated in lesion tissue compared with endometrium from women without endometriosis. The authors concluded that the differentially expressed miRNAs could modulate VEGFA, EGFR2, PTEN, and/or CXCR4 expression and contribute to the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Putative Targets of, and Functions for, Specific miRNAs in Endometriosis Pathogenesis

From the initial generation of miRNA profiles, later investigations began to focus on specific miRNAs and putative targets. The potential miRNA targets may be relevant to the pathophysiology of endometriosis and may aid in determining whether these miRNAs function as drivers of the disease. Ramón and colleagues28 assessed the expression of miRNAs proposed to play a role in angiogenesis. In this study, the investigators correlated the expression of miR-15b, miR-16, miR-175p, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-125a, miR-221, and miR-222 with that of specific angiogenesis factors, vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and thrombospondin-I (TSP-I). When analyzing paired specimens, ovarian endometriomas exhibited significantly lower levels of proangiogenic VEGF-A mRNA and protein and higher levels of miR-125a and miR-222 compared with corresponding eutopic endometrium. In contrast, levels of the angiogenesis inhibitor (TSP-I) were significantly higher in endometriomas and this was associated with reduced levels of miR-175p. Significant inverse correlations were noted between miR-222 and VEGF-A protein expression and miR-175p and TSP-I protein levels. These correlations suggest that the mis-expression of these miRNAs may at least in part contribute to the observed altered expression of the angiogenic factors and thus contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease.

One of the miRNAs evaluated by Ramón and colleagues28 was also examined by Zhao and coworkers.29 miR-20a expression was assessed in a total of 40 patients with ovarian endometriosis and 20 controls with benign ovarian tumors. qRT-PCR assessment revealed significantly increased miR-20a expression in ovarian endometriosis as compared with control ovarian cyst tissue. This increase in miR-20a expression is in contrast to the decrease detected by Ramón and colleagues28 as well as earlier assessments22,23 which reported lower miR-20a expression in lesion tissue. However, the reason for these discrepancies was not discussed. Zhao and colleagues determined the pathways potentially targeted by miR-20a, and the cell cycle pathway was identified as one of the most relevant. Assessment of predicted miR-20a target gene, netrin-4 (NTN4), revealed a significant decrease in patients with ovarian endometriosis. From this study, it was concluded that the increased expression of miR-20a may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ovarian endometriosis by suppressing NTN4 expression.

In addition to the earlier-mentioned miRNAs, several miRNAs have been further examined in endometriotic lesion tissue and/or cells. miR-199a is downregulated in several types of cancers,30,31 but had yet to be reported in endometriotic tissue. Considering that the pathophysiology of endometriosis shares similar characteristics with cancer, Dai and coworkers32 evaluated miR-199a expression in matched ovarian endometriomas and eutopic endometrium as well as endometrium from women free of endometriosis. Compared with eutopic endometrium from women without endometriosis, miR-199a expression was lower in both the eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis and ovarian endometriomas. Forced expression of miR-199a in endometrial stromal cells resulted in dampened cell adhesion, invasion, and migration. These cellular phenotypes were associated with suppression of the IKK/NFκB pathway and reduced interleukin-8 expression, suggesting a possible functional role for the mis-expressed levels of miR-199a in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

More recently, the above group investigated the role of miR-199a in the angiogenic potential of endometrial stromal cells under hypoxic conditions.33 Forced overexpression of miR-199a significantly attenuated its angiogenic potential under hypoxia and was also associated with a reduction in VEGF-A expression in these cells. Reporter gene assays targeting the 3′-UTR of VEGF-A and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α were incorporated to demonstrate that miR-199a downregulation was mediated at the level of the 3′ – UTR of these target genes. These findings may suggest that miR-199a may attenuate the angiogenic potential of stromal cells under hypoxia partly through HIF-1α/VEGF-A pathway suppression, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

miR-126 is also a proposed regulator of angiogenesis as well as growth, adhesion, and invasion.34,35 Earlier reports22,23 demonstrated increased expression of this miRNA in lesion tissue. Liu and colleagues,36 in contrast, reported that miR-126 expression was significantly reduced in ovarian endometriomas and eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis compared with eutopic endometrium from women free from the disease. Associated with this reduction in miR-126 was a significant increase in v-crk sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog (CRK) mRNA and protein as well as a highly significant association between endometrioma and eutopic endometrial miR-126 expression. More severe forms of endometriosis were associated with lower levels of miR-126 expression in these tissues. Unfortunately, the ability of miR-126 to modulate cellular events conducive to endometriosis pathogenesis, such as cellular proliferation, adhesion, and/or invasion, was not evaluated in this study. It should also be noted that a more recent array analysis27 observed decreased levels of ectopic endometrial tissue expression of miR-126 which is in agreement with the study by Liu and coworkers,36 but in contrast to earlier array analysis reports.22,23

There is considerable evidence that steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) expression is increased in stromal cells from endometriotic tissue and this may be due to multiple mechanisms.3739 miR-23a/b expression is reduced in endometriotic and eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis. As miR-23a/b is proposed to target SF-1, the potential mechanistic link between miR-23a/b and SF-1 expression in the pathogenesis of endometriosis was examined.40 Reduced levels of miR-23a/b expression was confirmed in ectopic endometriotic tissue and eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis compared with eutopic endometrium from women free of endometriosis and this reduction was associated with elevated transcript levels of NR5A1 (SF-1), STAR, and CYP19A1. To confirm that miR-23a/b directly regulated NR5A1 (SF-1) expression, luciferase reporter assays were conducted. Despite the fact that transfection with miR-23a/b precursor suppressed NR5A1 (SF-1) transcript, miR-23a/b did not bind to the 3′-UTR for NR5A1 (SF-1), suggesting that miR-23a/b mediation of SF-1 expression is via an indirect mechanism.

miR-145 expression has been shown to be mis-expressed in endometriotic tissue compared with eutopic endometrium.22,23,41,42 Coupled with the fact that miR-145 putatively targets factors involved in cellular events41 conducive to endometriosis survival/progression, Adammek and colleagues43 examined the expression and potential function of miR-145 in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Epithelial endometriotic 12Z cells were transfected with miR-145 which resulted in reduced cell proliferation and invasion, while miR-145 reduced cellular proliferation in transfected primary ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from endometriosis patients. In addition, it was discovered that miR-145 induced posttranscriptional downregulation of targets FASCIN-1, PAI-1, and JAM-A at the transcript and protein level in 12Z cells. Direct binding of miR-145 to the 3′ – UTR of JAM-A was confirmed by luciferase reporter construct assays. In contrast, only FASCIN-1 was shown to be modulated by miR-145 in primary ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from endometriosis patients. Cytoskeleton proteins ACTG2, TAGLN, and MYL9 were shown to be differentially regulated by miR-145 with overexpression of miR-145 leading to decreased ACTG2 transcript expression but increased TAGLN transcript expression, while MYL9 expression was unaffected. Similarly, miR-145 overexpression in 12Z and stromal cells from both eutopic and ectopic endometrial cells from women with endometriosis resulted in decreased transcript expression of pluripotency and stemness-related markers. Modulation of protein expression or verification of direct binding via 3′-UTR reporter assays was not performed to further validate these targets. Although initial results on miR-145 expression in different endometriosis samples are conflicting,22,23,42 these data suggest that miR-145 appears to inhibit endometriotic cell proliferation and invasion as well as regulation of stem cell properties. As discussed earlier, miRNAs are proposed to regulate steroid action within the endometrium to control the cellular events necessary for “normal” endometrial function. Mis-expression of miRNAs is in turn thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases of endometrial tissue origin such as endometriosis. Within the field of endometriosis research, several miRNAs have emerged as potential players in modulating the events conducive to the establishment, survival, and progression of the ectopic implant. Of these, functional data exist for only a few. To truly understand which miRNAs are important in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and how they contribute to the disease, greater effort must be put forth to standardize what constitutes true “control” groups and what constitutes “endometriotic tissue.” Reported and unpublished observations strongly suggest that not only does miRNA expression vary based on the “type” of implant (ovarian endometrioma vs. peritoneal implant) among study subjects but that this expression also varies by type of implant within study subject.

Building upon their earlier observations that miR-183 is decreased in endometriotic lesion tissue,23,26 Chen and colleagues incorporated microarray analysis to identify miR-183 targets that may be relevant to cellular functions associated with endometriosis pathophysiology.44 Twenty-seven differentially expressed genes were identified of which four of those downregulated genes (ITGB1, AMIGO2, VAV3, and PSEN2) were further assessed based on potential function and relevancy to endometriosis. Assessment of protein expression by Western blots demonstrated that integrin β1 (ITGB1), but not AMIGO2, was affected by miR-183 over-expression. Expression of detectable levels of neither VAV3 nor PSEN2 proteins was observed. Luciferase reporter assay verified that miR-183 targeted ITGB1 and that ITGB1 was overexpressed in the endometrium of endometriosis patients. Forced expression of ITGB1 could also rescue the repressive effects of miR-183 on endometrial stromal cell invasiveness. From these studies, the authors concluded that miR-183 may be involved in the development of endometriosis by regulating stromal cell ITGB1 expression and function.

Building upon the initial report by Ohlsson Teague and colleagues which demonstrated decreased levels of miR-1423p in endometriotic lesion tissue,22 Kästingschäfer and coworkers45 investigated the functional effect of miR-1423p expression in endometrial stroma cells in vitro. Increased expression of miR-1423p via transient transfection resulted in a significant reduction in cell viability as well as reduced expression of steroid sulfatase, interleukin-6-coreceptor gp130, and interleukin-6-mediated activation of the STAT3 pathway. These data were interpreted to imply that miR-1423p may modulate cell viability and that this may involve both steroid hormone- and cytokine-mediated signaling events. While these results would be in agreement with reduced levels of miR-1423p22 contributing to the survival of endometriotic lesion tissue, the reader should be aware that Yang and colleagues27 observed increased levels of this miRNA in endometriotic lesion tissue.

miR-451 is one of the few miRNAs associated with endometriosis24 which has been examined not only in human tissue/cells but also in animal models for the disease. Our laboratory reported the initial study examining both miR451 expression and function in human tissue and cells.46 miR-451 is elevated in endometriotic lesion tissue compared with paired eutopic endometrium from women with the disease.24 miR-451 expression exhibited an inverse association with transcript and protein expression of putative target, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Using luciferase reporter constructs for MIF, we demonstrated that miR-451 specifically bound to the 3′ – UTR to regulate its expression. Furthermore, forced expression of miR-451 induced a significant downregulation of both MIF mRNA and protein in a human endometrial cell line which was associated with a significant reduction in cell survival.

An additional study by Joshi and colleagues47 identified miR-451 mis-expression in women with endometriosis as well as in baboons with induced disease. Induction of endometriosis in baboons results in altered expression of several miRNAs including miR-451. Reduction in eutopic endometrial miR-451 expression was associated with increased expression of miR-451 target, YWHAZ, and this was observed in both baboon and human tissue. Regulation of YWHAZ by miR-451 was confirmed using 3′-UTR reporter assays in vitro. Lastly, overexpression of miR-451 in an immortalized human endometriotic epithelial cell line (12Z) led to the decreased expression of its target YWHAZ which was correlated with decreased cell proliferation. Collectively, both our study46 and that of Joshi and colleagues47 demonstrated that miR-451 is capable of modulating cell proliferation and this is associated with alterations in the expression of targets MIF and YWHAZ.

One of the major functional endpoints which have been examined with respect to miRNA function in endometrial/endometriotic cells has been angiogenesis. miR-15a-5p was reported to be suppressed in endometriotic lesion tissue and proposed to mediate angiogenic events associated with the disease.27 In a follow-up to their initial study,27 Liu and colleagues further examined miR-15a-5p expression in endometriotic lesion tissue as well as assessed its functional role.48 Compared with control samples, miR-15a-5p was downregulated in patients with endometriosis, supporting their initial array analysis observation.27 Forced expression of miR-15a-5p suppressed cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in endometriotic ectopic stem cells by targeting the 3′-UTR region of VEGFA. Thus, the suppressed levels of miR-15a-5p in endometriotic tissue coupled with the suppressive effects of this miRNA on cell proliferation in vitro may suggests that reduced miR-15a-5p levels may be conducive to lesion proliferation and survival.

Summary and Conclusion

In summary, early analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs between endometriotic tissue and eutopic endometrium has identified dozens of differentially expressed miRNAs. Subsequent studies have begun to dissect the role of these miRNAs to distinguish between drivers, those miRNAs which modulate key events conducive to the pathophysiology of endometriosis, and passengers, those miRNAs whose expression may change as a result of the disease pathogenesis. Driver miRNAs have been shown to modulate key components of biological pathways highly relevant to the pathophysiology of endometriosis including cellular proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis. While there is agreement among some studies with respect to which miRNAs are differentially expressed and the level of their expression compared with control tissue, there is also disagreement among these levels of expression. These discrepancies may be rooted in differences in the study groups, such as the types of samples that were included in their control groups as well as what “types” of endometriotic lesions were evaluated in their study groups. It is evident that for progress to be made in understanding the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, greater emphasis needs to be placed upon standardization of study designs and populations. By doing so, it will not only lead to more consistent experimental outcomes but also enhance experimental rigor and reproducibility. Nonetheless, the data that exist to date strongly suggest that miRNAs are mis-expressed in endometriotic lesion tissue where they are proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Future studies are expected to more clearly define the roles of these mis-expressed miRNAs in endometriosis pathophysiology by identifying the pathways and their components that are regulated by these miRNAs.

Acknowledgments

Results of original studies conducted by the author and discussed in this article were funded by NIH grant HD069043.

References

  • 1.Halme J, Hammond MG, Hulka JF, Raj SG, Talbert LM. Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(2):151–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu DTY, Hitchcock A. Endometriosis: its association with retrograde menstruation, dysmenorrhoea and tubal pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93(8):859–862. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07995.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dmowski WP, Gebel HM, Rawlins RG. Immunologic aspects of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1989;16(1):93–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharpe-Timms KL. Endometrial anomalies in women with endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;943:131–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sasson IE, Taylor HS. Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1127:106–115. doi: 10.1196/annals.1434.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vasudevan S, Tong Y, Steitz JA. Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007;318(5858):1931–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1149460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berezikov E, Chung WJ, Willis J, Cuppen E, Lai EC. Mammalian mirtron genes. Mol Cell. 2007;28(2):328–336. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saini HK, Griffiths-Jones S, Enright AJ. Genomic analysis of human microRNA transcripts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(45):17719–17724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703890104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cai X, Hagedorn CH, Cullen BR. Human microRNAs are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs. RNA. 2004;10(12):1957–1966. doi: 10.1261/rna.7135204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cheloufi S, Dos Santos CO, Chong MM, Hannon GJ. A dicer-independent miRNA biogenesis pathway that requires Ago catalysis. Nature. 2010;465(7298):584–589. doi: 10.1038/nature09092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cifuentes D, Xue H, Taylor DW, et al. A novel miRNA processing pathway independent of Dicer requires Argonaute2 catalytic activity. Science. 2010;328(5986):1694–1698. doi: 10.1126/science.1190809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hutvagner G, Simard MJ. Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(1):22–32. doi: 10.1038/nrm2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Standart N, Jackson RJ. MicroRNAs repress translation of m7Gppp-capped target mRNAs in vitro by inhibiting initiation and promoting deadenylation. Genes Dev. 2007;21(16):1975–1982. doi: 10.1101/gad.1591507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chendrimada TP, Finn KJ, Ji X, et al. MicroRNA silencing through RISC recruitment of eIF6. Nature. 2007;447(7146):823–828. doi: 10.1038/nature05841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lytle JR, Yario TA, Steitz JA. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(23):9667–9672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703820104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou X, Duan X, Qian J, Li F. Abundant conserved microRNA target sites in the 5′-untranslated region and coding sequence. Genetica. 2009;137(2):159–164. doi: 10.1007/s10709-009-9378-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barrett LW, Fletcher S, Wilton SD. Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression by the untranslated gene regions and other non-coding elements. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(21):3613–3634. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0990-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mendell JT. MicroRNAs: critical regulators of development, cellular physiology and malignancy. Cell Cycle. 2005;4(9):1179–1184. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.9.2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alvarez-Garcia I, Miska EA. MicroRNA functions in animal development and human disease. Development. 2005;132(21):4653–4662. doi: 10.1242/dev.02073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Soifer HS, Rossi JJ, Saetrom P. MicroRNAs in disease and potential therapeutic applications. Mol Ther. 2007;15(12):2070–2079. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohlsson Teague EM, Van der Hoek KH, Van der Hoek MB, et al. MicroRNA-regulated pathways associated with endometriosis. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23(2):265–275. doi: 10.1210/me.2008-0387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Filigheddu N, Gregnanin I, Porporato PE, et al. Differential expression of microRNAs between eutopic and ectopic endometrium in ovarian endometriosis. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:369549. doi: 10.1155/2010/369549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hawkins SM, Creighton CJ, Han DY, et al. Functional microRNA involved in endometriosis. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(5):821–832. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Long M, Wan X, La X, Gong X, Cai X. miR-29c is downregulated in the ectopic endometrium and exerts its effects on endometrial cell proliferation, apoptosis and invasion by targeting c-Jun. Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(4):1119–1125. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shi XY, Gu L, Chen J, Guo XR, Shi YL. Downregulation of miR-183 inhibits apoptosis and enhances the invasive potential of endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. Int J Mol Med. 2014;33(1):59–67. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang RQ, Teng H, Xu XH, et al. Microarray analysis of microRNA deregulation and angiogenesis-related proteins in endometriosis. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(2) doi: 10.4238/gmr.15027826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ramón LA, Braza-Boïls A, Gilabert-Estellés J, et al. microRNAs expression in endometriosis and their relation to angiogenic factors. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(5):1082–1090. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao M, Tang Q, Wu W, Xia Y, Chen D, Wang X. miR-20a contributes to endometriosis by regulating NTN4 expression. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(9):5793–5797. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3452-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen Q, Cicinnati VR, Zhang X, et al. Role of microRNA-199a-5p and discoidin domain receptor 1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma invasion. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:227. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheung HH, Davis AJ, Lee TL, et al. Methylation of an intronic region regulates miR-199a in testicular tumor malignancy. Oncogene. 2011;30(31):3404–3415. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dai L, Gu L, Di W. MiR-199a attenuates endometrial stromal cell invasiveness through suppression of the IKKβ/NF-κB pathway and reduced interleukin-8 expression. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012;18(3):136–145. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dai L, Lou W, Zhu J, Zhou X, Di W. MiR-199a inhibits the angiogenic potential of endometrial stromal cells under hypoxia by targeting HIF-1α/VEGF pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):4735–4744. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guo C, Sah JF, Beard L, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, Guda K. The noncoding RNA, miR-126, suppresses the growth of neoplastic cells by targeting phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and is frequently lost in colon cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47(11):939–946. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Feng R, Chen X, Yu Y, et al. miR-126 functions as a tumour suppressor in human gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2010;298(1):50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu S, Gao S, Wang XY, Wang DB. Expression of miR-126 and Crk in endometriosis: miR-126 may affect the progression of endometriosis by regulating Crk expression. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(4):1065–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2112-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Utsunomiya H, Cheng YH, Lin Z, et al. Upstream stimulatory factor-2 regulates steroidogenic factor-1 expression in endometriosis. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22(4):904–914. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bulun SE, Utsunomiya H, Lin Z, et al. Steroidogenic factor-1 and endometriosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;300(01/02):104–108. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xue Q, Lin Z, Yin P, et al. Transcriptional activation of steroidogenic factor-1 by hypomethylation of the 5′ CpG island in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):3261–3267. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shen L, Yang S, Huang W, et al. MicroRNA23a and microRNA23b deregulation derepresses SF-1 and upregulates estrogen signaling in ovarian endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1575–1582. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Götte M, Mohr C, Koo CY, et al. miR-145-dependent targeting of junctional adhesion molecule A and modulation of fascin expression are associated with reduced breast cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Oncogene. 2010;29(50):6569–6580. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng B, Xue X, Zhao Y, Chen J, Xu CY, Duan P. The differential expression of microRNA-143,145 in endometriosis. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(8):555–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Adammek M, Greve B, Kässens N, et al. MicroRNA miR-145 inhibits proliferation, invasiveness, and stem cell phenotype of an in vitro endometriosis model by targeting multiple cytoskeletal elements and pluripotency factors. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1346–1355.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen J, Gu L, Ni J, Hu P, Hu K, Shi YL. MiR-183 regulates ITGB1P expression and promotes invasion of endometrial stromal cells. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:340218. doi: 10.1155/2015/340218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kästingschäfer CS, Schäfer SD, Kiesel L, Götte M. miR-142-3p is a novel regulator of cell viability and proinflammatory signalling in endometrial stroma cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(5):553–556. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Graham A, Falcone T, Nothnick WB. The expression of microRNA-451 in human endometriotic lesions is inversely related to that of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and regulates MIF expression and modulation of epithelial cell survival. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):642–652. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Joshi NR, Su RW, Chandramouli GV, et al. Altered expression of microRNA-451 in eutopic endometrium of baboons (Papio anubis) with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2881–2891. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu XJ, Bai XG, Teng YL, Song L, Lu N, Yang RQ. miRNA-15a-5p regulates VEGFA in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(16):3319–3326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES