Significance
The perovskite oxide SrTiO3 is an n-type semiconductor, which exhibits superconductivity at low temperatures even though there are extraordinarily few electrons. In most materials, with so few electrons it becomes difficult to pair them into a macroscopic superconducting ground state. This regime is also unusual in that most theories of superconductivity rely on electrons that are much faster than their coupling (typically lattice vibrations or phonons). By using techniques in which tunneling junctions are engineered with atomic recision, we are able to probe the electronic structure of this material. The experiments indicate a large discrepancy between the electron–phonon coupling strength and the superconducting properties. This places SrTiO3, a host material for a variety of exotic quantum phases (i.e., in FeSe/SrTiO3, LaAlO3/SrTiO3), in a unique regime of superconductivity.
Keywords: superconductivity, electronic structure, polaron, oxide interface
Abstract
The nature of superconductivity in the dilute semiconductor SrTiO3 has remained an open question for more than 50 y. The extremely low carrier densities (– cm−3) at which superconductivity occurs suggest an unconventional origin of superconductivity outside of the adiabatic limit on which the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and Migdal–Eliashberg (ME) theories are based. We take advantage of a newly developed method for engineering band alignments at oxide interfaces and access the electronic structure of Nb-doped SrTiO3, using high-resolution tunneling spectroscopy. We observe strong coupling to the highest-energy longitudinal optic (LO) phonon branch and estimate the doping evolution of the dimensionless electron–phonon interaction strength (). Upon cooling below the superconducting transition temperature (), we observe a single superconducting gap corresponding to the weak-coupling limit of BCS theory, indicating an order of magnitude smaller coupling (). These results suggest that despite the strong normal state interaction with electrons, the highest LO phonon does not provide a dominant contribution to pairing. They further demonstrate that SrTiO3 is an ideal system to probe superconductivity over a wide range of carrier density, adiabatic parameter, and electron–phonon coupling strength.
Electron-doped SrTiO3 undergoes a superconducting transition at low temperature following a dome-like behavior that spans the largest range of carrier density () and Fermi energy () of any material (1–3). For much of the superconducting dome, the typical phonon energies () are comparable to or larger than , yielding an adiabatic ratio of . The nature of superconductivity in the limit of so few electrons is a long-standing problem in condensed-matter physics. Several theoretical approaches consider pairing due to electron–phonon (-ph) coupling (4–8). In parallel, there is experimental evidence for the formation of large polarons—quasiparticles arising from strong -ph coupling (9–14). Pairing scenarios involving plasmons or quantum critical ferroelectric fluctuations have also been proposed (5, 6, 15, 16). These fundamental issues are also relevant for emerging 2D superconductors such as LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (17), -doped SrTiO3 (18), and FeSe/SrTiO3 (19).
Tunneling spectroscopy, which we use here, has been instrumental in studying superconductivity, -ph coupling, and their interrelationship (20). The onset of superconductivity creates a gap () in the density of states (DOS), which can be resolved in high-resolution tunneling experiments. In addition, if the coupling is strong, the -ph interaction can induce measurable renormalizations to the electronic band structure (21, 22). Recently, there have been compelling angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) reports of band renormalization at the surface of SrTiO3, where replica or shake-off states arising from polaronic coupling to the highest-energy longitudinal optic (LO) phonon (13, 14) are observed. Such dramatic modifications of the electronic structure should also be directly observable in tunneling experiments. Moreover, while ARPES experiments are limited to temperature regimes above , tunneling spectroscopy offers a unique opportunity to examine the relationship between the superconducting electronic structure and -ph coupling in the same sample.
Energetically resolved tunneling is a challenge in bulk SrTiO3 due to the large dielectric constant ( 20,000 at low temperatures), which generates long depletion lengths (100 nm). Early experiments attempted to examine the superconducting gap using Schottky contacts to heavily doped SrTiO3 and tunnel through the depletion region; they indicated coupling to the LO phonon modes and multiple superconducting gaps, stimulating considerations of multiband superconductivity (23–25). However, because of the uncontrolled and varying interfacial carrier densities and depletion lengths, experiments probing the doping evolution of the bulk material were unfeasible. Recently, pioneering tunneling experiments have examined the 2D superconducting layer formed at the interface between LaAlO3 and undoped SrTiO3 (LaAlO3/SrTiO3) (26, 27), using the thin LaAlO3 as the tunnel barrier. Similar to bulk SrTiO3, LaAlO3/SrTiO3 exhibits a superconducting transition below 0.4 K (28), but in the 2D limit. This system exhibits a superconducting dome that can be tuned by a backgate, where the dominant effect of gating is the variation of the mobility edge rather than modulation of the sheet carrier density (17, 29). Moreover, this 2D superconducting ground state is highly complex, as demonstrated by the coexistence of magnetism (30), a high density of both itinerant and localized states, observation of a pseudogap (26), and the occupation of multiple subbands (31).
Here, we demonstrate access to the bulk Nb-doped SrTiO3 electronic structure in both the normal and the superconducting state, at carrier densities across the superconducting dome. Using atomically engineered interface tunnel barriers (32, 33), in which ultrathin epitaxial (001) LaAlO3 serves as a polar tunnel barrier in planar tunnel junctions (Fig. 1 A and B), we suppress the interfacial depletion layer and ensure that the tunneling spectra reflect the intrinsic bulk properties. Importantly, in contrast to LaAlO3/SrTiO3, when ultrathin epitaxial layers of LaAlO3 are placed on top of metallic Nb-doped SrTiO3, there is no additional electronic reconstruction induced at the interface for the nominal doping concentrations studied here. This is consistent with the observation of the crossover from excess interface charge induced by a polar discontinuity to metallic screening across a metal–insulator transition (34). Instead, the LaAlO3 provides an interfacial dipole, shifting the band alignments to remove the depletion region (Fig. 1 C and D). This simple technique is analogous to band alignment manipulations in semiconductor heterostructures (35) and has been demonstrated to be highly effective across several oxide systems and applications (33, 36, 37).
Fig. 1.
Dipole-controlled interfaces for high-resolution tunneling spectroscopy of Nb:SrTiO3. (A–D) Schematic diagrams of the tunneling junction depict (A) the atomic layer stacking with an interfacial LaAlO3 dipole layer which serves as the tunneling barrier, (B) device measurement geometry, and (C and D) resulting band diagrams without and with the insertion of the interface dipole. (E) Experimental conductance () spectra in the normal state for three characteristic doping concentrations measured at K.
Results
Tunneling Spectroscopy in the Normal State.
Fig. 1E plots the measured differential conductance () in the positive bias regime (electron extraction from SrTiO3) for several characteristic doping concentrations, with 13 meV, 23 meV, and 61 meV (SI Appendix, section I). Complete details on the sample preparation and measurement are provided in Materials and Methods and SI Appendix, section IV. The asymmetry in bias polarity is due to the highly unequal DOS of the semiconducting and metallic electrodes, producing a global minimum set by the SrTiO3 Fermi level. Additionally, we observe clear features of enhanced conductance at 36.0 meV, 60.5 meV, and 98.8 meV, corresponding with the energies of bulk SrTiO3 polar LO2, LO3, and LO4 phonon modes, respectively, and not barrier LaAlO3 modes (SI Appendix, section IV) (38, 39). To examine these features with higher sensitivity, we directly measure / as shown in Fig. 2A. The data clearly indicate phonon interactions at energies above the highest-energy LO phonon branch ( V). For all doping concentrations examined here, the dominant spectral features appear at regular intervals of energy . In the low-density limit ( = 13 meV), additional structure is found up to fourth order in LO4 (i.e., , , and ). At higher density ( = 61 meV), the higher-order structure arising from LO4 is suppressed, indicating that the -ph coupling is larger at low doping. Qualitatively, the observation of interactions involving up to four phonon processes indicates strong -ph coupling. For instance, the second-order acoustic phonon structure has been observed for Pb ( = 1.3) (40, 41).
Fig. 2.
Second-harmonic tunneling spectroscopy of -ph coupling in Nb:SrTiO3. (A) Measured raw data ( K) for three samples with the following doping concentrations: 1.6 1019 cm−3, 3.2 1019 cm−3, and 1.6 1020 cm−3. Dashed lines indicate the transverse optic (TO) and LO phonon modes from infrared reflectivity and Raman spectroscopy on bulk crystals (38, 39), as well as some of their higher harmonics. (B) Extracted LO4 -ph linewidth [defined as twice the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the LO4 feature in (SI Appendix, section IV)] vs. bulk . The lineshape evolves as , increasing the uncertainty toward larger linewidth values (SI Appendix, section IV).
In general, tunneling spectroscopy can exhibit features arising from both elastic (DOS renormalizations via virtual phonons) and inelastic (real phonon emission) processes (21, 42–45). Parsing the contributions is a subtle issue and depends upon the material system, quality of the junction, and experimental probe (i.e., scanning tunneling microscopy, point contact, or planar junction). Here, the observation of peaks, rather than steps in the conductance, rules out threshold inelastic processes (42, 43). Further, the lineshape of the -ph spectral features seen in Figs. 1E and 2A evolves monotonically as a function of doping, depending upon the ratio . One of the key findings here is the observation of a quantitative correspondence between the LO4 phonon spectral linewidth and the bulk Fermi level, as shown in Fig. 2B. This result demonstrates that the -ph linewidth provides an independent spectroscopic measure of the interfacial . Further, Fig. 2B indicates that the interface reflects the intended bulk carrier density and is incompatible with surface accumulation layers. The quantitative agreement with SrTiO3 bulk phonons, sharp bandwidth-limited () spectra at low densities, and evolution as a function of doping indicate the importance of the -ph coupling within SrTiO3. While we cannot rule out the presence of inelastic processes, as a first attempt to estimate the -ph coupling, we consider that similar LO4 features have been observed by ARPES (13, 14) and examine this problem in terms of the many-body interactions within SrTiO3.
Modeling the e-ph Coupling in the Normal State.
To elucidate the impact that the -ph coupling can have on the electronic bands and tunneling spectra, we calculate the normal-state spectral function for noninteracting electrons in a single parabolic band coupled to an Einstein mode of = 100 meV. LO modes in ionic crystals generate long-range dipole fields which can interact strongly with charged carriers, leading to an interaction with matrix element that is highly momentum dependent (46). In the real system, the coupling is screened such that , where is the dielectric function arising from all sources. To calculate the electronic self-energy in the normal state, we consider dynamic screening in the long-wavelength limit such that , where is the plasma frequency. Therefore, , where contains all of the momentum-independent factors and is adjusted to set the value of . Full details of the self-energy calculations are provided in SI Appendix, section II.
Fig. 3A shows the calculated DOS at several values of coupling strength, indicating renormalized spectral weight appearing at intervals of . Second-order phonon structure appears in the calculated self-energy for > 0.5. The formation of the replicated DOS peaks is primarily due to the forward-focusing nature of the polar coupling and is distinct from -linear coupling to acoustic modes or momentum-independent Holstein-like couplings (19, 20). As shown conceptually in Fig. 3B in the antiadiabatic limit (), the replicated DOS with narrow bandwidth generates peaks in the differential conductance as the phonon modes are traversed as a function of bias, enabling a bandwidth-limited resolution of the phonon contributions consistent with the experimental observations.
Fig. 3.
Renormalization of the electron band structure due to a polar -ph interaction. (A) Calculated DOS at several values of for a single parabolic band ( meV and , where is the effective mass and is the bare electron mass) coupled to a single dispersionless phonon mode ( meV). The momentum dependence of the polar interaction generates replicas of the main electronic band, which are offset from the main band by multiples of the phonon energy. Further details are provided in SI Appendix, section II. (B) Schematic depicting tunneling including the -ph–induced structure in the DOS.
We estimate the strength of the -ph interaction () by comparing the relative multiphonon intensities of the measured tunneling spectra with the self-energy calculations. This approach relies on the appearance of multiphonon modes and is distinct from the McMillan and Rowell (21) “inversion” method applicable only for and below the superconducting transition temperature (21, 27) (SI Appendix, section IV). Fig. 4A plots the measured / for = 13 meV (same as Fig. 2A, bottom curve), where the largest number of phonon replicas is observed. Due to the narrow bandwidth, modes are visible at and , where is an integer (Fig. 4B). Here we focus solely on estimating for LO4 which dominates the tunneling spectra at all dopings. A relative increase in the spectral weight of multiphonon processes is observed with decreasing carrier density (Fig. 4C). Fig. 4D shows the measured intensity ratios, , for the LO4 mode together with the DOS calculations of Fig. 3. We have restricted the self-energy calculation to , where a perturbative expansion is a more controlled approximation (SI Appendix, section II). In the absence of an exact strong-coupling theory, an estimate for the -ph coupling can be obtained by extrapolating to larger values. Estimated in this way, ranges from 0.9 to 1.4, where the highest doping concentration ( cm−3) exhibits , similar to other experiments at the same carrier density (10, 47). We conclude that more dilute samples exhibit stronger coupling to LO4.
Fig. 4.
Doping dependence of the e-ph coupling in Nb:SrTiO3. (A) Second harmonic spectra for cm−3 measured at T = 2 K (black line, top). A smoothly varying background has been subtracted from the raw data (Fig. 2A, bottom curve) by a spline fit. The contributions from interactions corresponding to ( is an integer) are fitted with the derivative of an asymmetric Lorentzian (red line, top) for which the integrated -ph contribution to is shown in the bottom (gray curve). (B) Extracted energies for multiphonon processes identified as and , demonstrating that LO3 exhibits repeat structure at intervals of LO4. (C) Amplitude of the phonon contribution (LO4 only) as a function of bias for three different doping concentrations. (D) Black squares show the intensity ratios for one-phonon () and two-phonon () processes calculated from the renormalized DOS (Fig. 3A). We linearly extrapolate out of the perturbative regime of -ph coupling strength in the self-energy calculations (black dashed line) and plot the experimental / ratios (open circles) to obtain .
The tunneling results presented thus far clearly indicate that the LO modes significantly modify the electronic properties in SrTiO3 over a wide range of carrier density. This conclusion is consistent with a growing body of experimental evidence for polaron formation in this system. Our results are strikingly similar to recent photoemission measurements of the electronic spectral function at the surface of SrTiO3, where replica bands were observed at regular intervals of the LO4 phonon mode (13, 14). In particular, the ratios of the photoemission replica intensities (analogous to /) are remarkably close to those found here, indicating comparable regimes for the -ph coupling strength. These observations are also consistent with magnetotransport, optical conductivity, and heat capacity experiments indicating large polaron formation in SrTiO3 (9, 10, 12). Despite the strong -ph coupling, the momentum dependence of the interaction produces relatively modest mass renormalizations, and rather than self-trapped small polarons, highly mobile carriers are found even in the extremely dilute limit (3, 48).
Superconducting Tunneling Spectroscopy.
Fig. 5A shows a wide-scan / spectrum measured below for = 2.5 1020 cm−3 ( 70 meV), corresponding to the overdoped side of the Nb:SrTiO3 superconducting dome. Conductivity steps due to -ph interactions are clearly evident, as well as the superconducting gap at low bias. A high-resolution scan (Fig. 5B) shows a single gap which is well fitted by the BCS gap function, , where is the Fermi function and is the Bogoliubov quasiparticle DOS with a quasiparticle broadening factor . Best fits to the lowest-temperature data yield = 41.9 0.1 eV and = 2.2 0.3 eV (49). The suppression of the DOS in the superconducting gap and the low broadening indicates the very high quality of the junction. For all samples measured we have observed only a single gap, indicating that while at least two -orbital bands are populated for these carrier densities, they are not spectroscopically distinct.
Fig. 5.
Superconducting tunneling spectroscopy of Nb-doped SrTiO3. (A) Wide-scan measured at mK showing the interaction with the high-energy phonon modes, as well as the superconducting gap at low bias (near V = 0 V). (B) High-resolution measurements of the superconducting gap for several temperatures. Dashed curve is the best fit for the 40-mK data to the BCS gap equation. For A and B, n = 2.5 × 1020 cm−3, corresponding with the overdoped side of the Nb:SrTiO3 superconducting dome. (C) Temperature dependence of the superconducting gap () (left axis) and resistivity () (right axis), normalized to the normal-state value () measured at T = 400 mK. Overdoped, n = 2.5 × 1020 cm−3 (black data); underdoped, cm−3 (blue data). (D) Comparison of the e-ph coupling () estimated from the normal-state spectra with the extracted superconducting pairing strength () from the superconducting gap. This unconventional regime is evident compared with conventional superconductors over a broad range of -ph coupling (data compiled from refs. 20, 21, 41, and 51).
For conventional phonon-mediated superconductors, the strength of the pairing interaction can be determined by deviations from the universal thermodynamic relations of BCS theory. In particular, weak-coupling BCS predicts an exact ratio between the zero temperature gap () and of , where is Boltzmann’s constant. In contrast, strong-coupling superconductors deviate from this value (i.e., Pb with = 4.5 and = 1.3), which is accounted for by including retardation corrections within ME (20, 41). Due to the signatures of strong -ph coupling observed in the normal state, one might expect SrTiO3 to exhibit significant departures from weak-coupling BCS theory, particularly in the underdoped region where large phonon renormalizations are found. This, however, is not what we observe. Fig. 5C plots (open circles, left axis) and the normalized resistivity () (solid lines, right axis) for two characteristic samples corresponding to the overdoped and underdoped sides of the Nb-doped superconducting dome. The temperature dependence is accurately described by (50). We find that the gap closes () with the onset of the resistive , indicating the absence of a pseudogap in the bulk limit. Surprisingly, we find and for the overdoped and underdoped samples, respectively. These values are remarkably close to the universal weak-coupling limit predicted by BCS theory, even compared with the vast majority of conventional superconductors (20). Such precise agreement is a surprise for a system that clearly violates key assumptions upon which the theory was derived, but suggests that some of the conclusions apply more generally. In this context, as the simplest estimation for the pairing strength, the BCS equation for indicates a coupling strength of 0.1 (SI Appendix, section III).
Discussion
Taken together, these results reveal an order of magnitude discrepancy between the strength of the -ph coupling that modifies the normal-state properties () and the superconducting pairing strength (), placing SrTiO3 in an unusual regime (Fig. 5D). For conventional -ph–mediated superconductors, the -ph coupling that renormalizes the band structure is in close quantitative correspondence with the superconducting pairing strength needed to fully account for the superconducting within ME (20, 21, 41, 51). This one-to-one correlation is shown in Fig. 5D, and it should be noted that remarkably few (conventional or unconventional) superconductors lie in the extreme weak-coupling regime. Considering the strong -ph coupling, occupation of multiple bands, proximity to a ferroelectric quantum critical point, and low carrier density, it would be natural to expect SrTiO3 to exhibit deviations from the BCS limit. Fig. 5D shows that while the normal-state properties certainly exhibit strong phonon renormalizations, the superconducting state appears conventional and captured by a weak-coupling theory.
In light of this result, it is reasonable to ask whether LO4 contributes to pairing and, if so, whether the discrepancy between and could be explained by invoking the repulsive Coulomb interaction. A conventional Coulomb pseudopotential () approach (questionable in the dilute limit) would require a large (0.5), far in excess of canonical values () and that varies dramatically with density. This, however, is unphysical for SrTiO3, considering the noninteracting behavior found in the dilute limit (3, 48), where the highly polarizable lattice is very effective in dynamically screening the electrons. We can infer that the LO4 mode is not effective in mediating an attractive pairing potential, consistent with proposals for other pairing mechanisms which consider exchanging the available low-energy modes (i.e., acoustic modes, the TO soft mode, plasmons, or quantum critical fluctuations) (4, 6, 8, 15).
While we cannot distinguish between these possible pairing mechanisms, the results presented here offer further perspective. A perturbative treatment of the phonon interactions in semiconductors is typically a reasonable approximation, and a natural consequence of the high-energy LO modes is to simply screen both the Coulomb repulsion and the pairing vertex, promoting superconductivity at lower carrier densities than originally considered by BCS. However, in most superconducting semiconductors the adiabatic (Migdal) ratio () is close to but typically less than 1 (52). It appears essential that in SrTiO3 almost all of the superconducting dome corresponds to , and unity ratio corresponds to the loss of superconductivity in the overdoped regime. Therefore, while large coupling to high-energy modes leads to strongly dressed quasiparticles, this interaction does not lead to a comparable contribution to pairing, leaving low-energy phonons (or other bosonic excitations) to give rise to superconductivity out of these polarons, surprisingly well beyond the Migdal limit. A comprehensive theory of superconductivity here should realize a weak-coupling superconducting state out of strongly dressed quasiparticles over a wide range of coupling strengths and adiabatic parameters.
Materials and Methods
Nb-doped SrTiO3 films were deposited on TiO2 terminated SrTiO3(001) substrates by pulsed laser deposition as described elsewhere (53). Subsequently, 0–4 unit cells (u.c.) single-crystal LaAlO3 epitaxial layers were grown at = 650 °C with = torr of O2 with a fluence of 0.43 J/cm2. During growth, the LaAlO3 thickness was monitored by reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) intensity oscillations. Except where indicated, 3-u.c.-thick LaAlO3 tunneling barriers were used throughout this study. The oxide heterostructure was then postannealed at = 400 °C in 0.4 atm of O2 for 45 min. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements identified that the resulting surface was atomically flat over large areas (50 × 50 m2) with step-and-terrace morphology. Nb-doped SrTiO3 films grown in this regime exhibit bulk-like mobility values and full carrier activation (53). The samples were transferred ex situ to an adjacent chamber for the deposition of metallic electrodes at room temperature through a shadow mask. Just before deposition, the films were preannealed at 500 °C in torr of O2 to remove adsorbates (33). For the superconducting gap measurements, we used Ag electrodes contacted by Au wire and Ag paint. Ohmic contacts were made to the Nb-doped SrTiO3 film by wire bonding with Al wire. Details regarding the electronic measurements, data analysis, and DOS calculations are provided in SI Appendix.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, P. B. Littlewood, D. J. Scalapino, A. V. Maharaj, A. Edelman, A. J. Millis, L. Rademaker, Z.-X. Shen, and Y. Wang for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515; and by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems Initiative through Grant GBMF4415 (dilution refrigerator experiments). S.J. acknowledges support from the University of Tennessee’s Science Alliance Joint Directed Research and Development program, a collaboration with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1713916115/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Schooley JF, Hosler WR, Cohen ML. Superconductivity in semiconducting SrTiO3. Phys Rev Lett. 1964;12:474. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Koonce CS, Cohen ML, Schooley JF, Hosler WR, Pfeiffer ER. Superconducting transition temperatures of semiconducting SrTiO3. Phys Rev. 1967;163:380–390. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin X, et al. Critical doping for the onset of a two-band superconducting ground state in SrTiO3 − δ. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;112:207002. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Appel J. Soft-mode superconductivity in SrTiO3 − x. Phys Rev. 1969;180:508–516. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takada Y. Theory of superconductivity in polar semiconductors and its application to -type semiconducting SrTiO3. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1980;49:1267–1275. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruhman J, Lee PA. Superconductivity at very low density: The case of strontium titanate. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:224515. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rosenstein B, Shapiro BY, Shapiro I, Li D. Superconductivity in the two-dimensional electron gas induced by high-energy optical phonon mode and large polarization of the SrTiO3 substrate. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:024505. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Klimin S, Tempere J, Devreese J, Van der Marel D. Multiband superconductivity due to the electron–LO–phonon interaction in strontium titanate and on a SrTiO3/LaAlO3 interface. J Superconductivity Novel Magnetism. 2017;30:757–761. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahrens M, Merkle R, Rahmati B, Maier J. Effective masses of electrons in -type SrTiO3 determined from low-temperature specific heat capacities. Physica B: Condens Matter. 2007;393:239–248. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Mechelen J, et al. Electron-phonon interaction and charge carrier mass enhancement in SrTiO3. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:226403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.226403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang YJ, Bostwick A, Kim YS, Horn K, Rotenberg E. Structure and correlation effects in semiconducting SrTiO3. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:235109. [Google Scholar]
- 12.van der Marel D, van Mechelen JLM, Mazin II. Common fermi-liquid origin of resistivity and superconductivity in -type SrTiO3. Phys Rev B. 2011;84:205111. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen C, Avila J, Frantzeskakis E, Levy A, Asensio MC. Observation of a two-dimensional liquid of Fröhlich polarons at the bare SrTiO3 surface. Nat Commun. 2015;6:9585. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Z, et al. Tailoring the nature and strength of electron-phonon interactions in the SrTiO3(001) two-dimensional electron liquid. Nat Mater. 2016;15:835–839. doi: 10.1038/nmat4623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Edge JM, Kedem Y, Aschauer U, Spaldin NA, Balatsky AV. Quantum critical origin of the superconducting dome in SrTiO3. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115:247002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.247002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rischau CW, et al. A ferroelectric quantum phase transition inside the superconducting dome of Sr1 − xCaxTiO3 − δ. Nat Phys. 2017;13:643–648. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Caviglia AD, et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface ground state. Nature. 2008;456:624–627. doi: 10.1038/nature07576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kozuka Y, et al. Two-dimensional normal-state quantum oscillations in a superconducting heterostructure. Nature. 2009;462:487–490. doi: 10.1038/nature08566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee JJ, et al. Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3. Nature. 2014;515:245–248. doi: 10.1038/nature13894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carbotte JP. Properties of boson-exchange superconductors. Rev Mod Phys. 1990;62:1027. [Google Scholar]
- 21.McMillan WL, Rowell JM. Lead phonon spectrum calculated from superconducting density of states. Phys Rev Lett. 1965;14:108–112. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lanzara A, et al. Evidence for ubiquitous strong electron–phonon coupling in high-temperature superconductors. Nature. 2001;412:510–514. doi: 10.1038/35087518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sroubek Z. Electron tunneling in Indium-SrTiO3:Nb Schottky barriers. Solid State Commun. 1969;7:1561–1564. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Binnig G, Baratoff A, Hoenig H, Bednorz J. Two-band superconductivity in Nb-doped SrTiO3. Phys Rev Lett. 1980;45:1352–1355. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fernandes RM, Haraldsen JT, Wölfle P, Balatsky AV. Two-band superconductivity in doped SrTiO3 films and interfaces. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:014510. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Richter C, et al. Interface superconductor with gap behaviour like a high-temperature superconductor. Nature. 2013;502:528–531. doi: 10.1038/nature12494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boschker H, Richter C, Fillis-Tsirakis E, Schneider CW, Mannhart J. Electron-phonon coupling and the superconducting phase diagram of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12309. doi: 10.1038/srep12309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reyren N, et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science. 2007;317:1196–1199. doi: 10.1126/science.1146006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bell C, et al. Dominant mobility modulation by the electric field effect at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:226802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.226802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bert JA, et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat Phys. 2011;7:767–771. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen Z, et al. Dual-gate modulation of carrier density and disorder in an oxide two-dimensional electron system. Nano Lett. 2016;16:6130–6136. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yajima T, et al. Enhanced electrical transparency by ultrathin LaAlO3 insertion at oxide metal/semiconductor heterointerfaces. Nano Lett. 2015;15:1622–1626. doi: 10.1021/nl504169m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Inoue H, et al. Origin of the magnetoresistance in oxide tunnel junctions determined through electric polarization control of the interface. Phys Rev X. 2015;5:041023. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mundy JA, et al. Visualizing the interfacial evolution from charge compensation to metallic screening across the manganite metal–insulator transition. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3464. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tung RT. The physics and chemistry of the Schottky barrier height. Appl Phys Rev. 2014;1:011304. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tachikawa T, Minohara M, Hikita Y, Bell C, Hwang HY. Tuning band alignment using interface dipoles at the Pt/Anatase TiO2 interface. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7458–7461. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hikita Y, et al. Band edge engineering of oxide photoanodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting: Integration of subsurface dipoles with atomic-scale control. Adv Energy Mater. 2016;6:1502154. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Petzelt J, et al. Dielectric, infrared, and Raman response of undoped SrTiO3 ceramics: Evidence of polar grain boundaries. Phys Rev B. 2001;64:184111. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vogt H, Rossbroich G. Accurate determination of the far-infrared dispersion in SrTiO3 by hyper-Raman spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 1981;24:3086–3091. [Google Scholar]
- 40.McMillan WL, Rowell JM. In: Superconductivity. Parks RD, editor. Vol 1 Dekker; New York: 1969. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schackert M, et al. Local measurement of the Eliashberg function of Pb islands: Enhancement of electron-phonon coupling by quantum well states. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;114:047002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.047002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wolf EL. Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy. Vol 152 Oxford Univ Press; New York: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Adkins CJ, Phillips WA. Inelastic electron tunnelling spectroscopy. J Phys C. 1985;18:1313. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Conley J, Mahan G. Tunneling spectroscopy in GaAs. Phys Rev. 1967;161:681–695. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jaklevic RC, Lambe J. Molecular vibration spectra by electron tunneling. Phys Rev Lett. 1966;17:1139–1140. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Giustino F. Electron-phonon interactions from first principles. Rev Mod Phys. 2017;89:015003. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Meevasana W, et al. Strong energy–momentum dispersion of phonon-dressed carriers in the lightly doped band insulator SrTiO3. New J Phys. 2010;12:023004. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kozuka Y, Susaki T, Hwang HY. Vanishing Hall coefficient in the extreme quantum limit in photocarrier-doped SrTiO3. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101:096601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.096601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dynes R, Narayanamurti V, Garno JP. Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor. Phys Rev Lett. 1978;41:1509–1512. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Devereaux TP, Einzel D. Electronic Raman scattering in superconductors as a probe of anisotropic electron pairing. Phys Rev B. 1995;51:16336. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.51.16336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Allen PB. Empirical electron-phonon values from resistivity of cubic metallic elements. Phys Rev B. 1987;36:2920. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.36.2920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bustarret E. Superconductivity in doped semiconductors. Physica C Superconductivity Appl. 2015;514:36. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kozuka Y, Hikita Y, Bell C, Hwang HY. Dramatic mobility enhancements in doped SrTiO3 thin films by defect management. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;97:012107. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.