Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 Feb 17;2018(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13660-018-1636-8

A note on some identities of derangement polynomials

Taekyun Kim 1,2, Dae San Kim 3, Gwan-Woo Jang 2, Jongkyum Kwon 4,
PMCID: PMC5816772  PMID: 29497260

Abstract

The problem of counting derangements was initiated by Pierre Rémond de Montmort in 1708 (see Carlitz in Fibonacci Q. 16(3):255–258, 1978, Clarke and Sved in Math. Mag. 66(5):299–303, 1993, Kim, Kim and Kwon in Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 28(1):1–11 2018. A derangement is a permutation that has no fixed points, and the derangement number dn is the number of fixed-point-free permutations on an n element set. In this paper, we study the derangement polynomials and investigate some interesting properties which are related to derangement numbers. Also, we study two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and show some relations between them. In addition, we express several special polynomials in terms of the higher-order derangement polynomials by using umbral calculus.

Keywords: Derangement numbers, Derangement polynomials, r-derangement numbers, r-derangement polynomials, Umbral calculus

Introduction

Let C be the complex number field, and let F be the set of all formal power series in the variable t with coefficients in C:

F={f(t)=k=0aktkk!|akC}. 1.1

Let P=C[x], and let P be the vector space of all linear functionals on P. We denote the action of a linear functional LP on polynomials p(x)P by Lp(x), and it is known that vector space operations on P are defined by

L+Mp(x)=Lp(x)+Mp(x),cLp(x)=cLp(x), 1.2

where c is a complex constant (see [35]).

For f(t)=k=0aktkk!, we define a linear functional on P by setting

f(t)xn=an(n0)(see [6, 7]). 1.3

From (1.3), we note that

tkxn=n!δn,k(n,k0)(see [8]), 1.4

where δn,k is the Kronecker symbol.

The order o(f(t)) of a power series f(t)(0)F is the smallest integer k such that the coefficients of tk do not vanish. For f(t),g(t)F, with o(f(t))=1 and o(g(t))=0, there exists a unique sequence Sn(x) of polynomials such that g(t)f(t)k|Sn(x)=n!δn,k for n,k0 (see [5, 8]). The sequence Sn(x) is called the Sheffer sequence for (g(t),f(t)), which is denoted by Sn(x)(g(t),f(t)). It is known that Sn(x)(g(t),f(t)) if and only if

1g(f¯(t))exf¯(t)=n=0Sn(x)tnn!, 1.5

where f¯(t) is the compositional inverse of f(t) with

f(f¯(t))=f¯(f(t))=t(see [8, 9]). 1.6

For f(t)F and p(x)P, by (1.4), we get

f(t)=k=0f(t)|xktkk!,p(x)=k=0tk|p(x)xkk!(see [9]). 1.7

From (1.7), we note that

p(k)(0)=tk|p(x)=1|p(k)(x)(k0), 1.8

where p(k)(x)=(ddx)kp(x).

From (1.8), we easily get

tkp(x)=p(k)(x),eytp(x)=p(x+y),eyt|p(x)=p(y)(see [9]). 1.9

Let Sn(x)(g(t),f(t)) and rn(x)(h(t),l(t)) (n0). Then we have

Sn(x)=m=0nCn,mrm(x)(n0)(see [8, 9]), 1.10

where

Cn,m=1m!h(f¯(t))g(f¯(t))l(f¯(t))m|xn(n,m0). 1.11

For u(1)C, the Frobenius-Euler numbers are defined by the generating function

1uetu=n=0Hn(u)tnn!(see [10–12]). 1.12

When u=1, Hn(1)=En are the ordinary Euler numbers.

The Bernoulli polynomials are given by

tet1ext=n=0Bn(x)tnn!(see [3, 12, 13]). 1.13

When x=0, Bn=Bn(0) are the Bernoulli numbers.

We know that the Euler polynomials are defined by

2et+1ext=n=0En(x)tnn!(see [10, 11]). 1.14

When x=0, En=En(0) are the Euler numbers.

The falling factorial sequence is defined as

(x)0=1,(x)n=x(x1)(xn+1)(n1). 1.15

The Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined by

(x)n=l=0nS1(n,l)xl(n0)(see [8]), 1.16

and the Stirling numbers of the second kind are given by

xn=l=0nS2(n,l)(x)l(n0)(see [8, 14, 15]). 1.17

The Stirling numbers of the second kind are also given by the exponential generating function (see [8, p.59])

1k!(et1)k=n=kS2(n,k)tnn!. 1.18

It is well known that the Bell polynomials are defined by the generating function

ex(et1)=n=0Beln(x)tnn!(see [9]). 1.19

When x=1, Beln=Beln(1) (n0) are the Bell numbers.

From (1.19), we have

Beln(x)=k=0nS2(n,k)xk(n0)(see [9]). 1.20

A derangement is a permutation that has no fixed points. The derangement number dn is the number of fixed-point-free permutations on an n element set (see [13]). The problem of counting derangements was initiated by Pierre Rémond de Montmort in 1708 (see [13]). The first few terms of the derangement number sequence {dn}n=0 are d0=1, d1=0, d2=1, d3=2, d4=9, d5=44, d6=265, d7=1854, … .

Indeed, dn is given by the closed form formula:

dn=n!k=0n(1)kk!(see [3]). 1.21

From (1.21), we note that the generating function of derangement numbers is given by

11tet=n=0dntnn!(see [9]). 1.22

By using (1.22), it is not difficult to show that

dm=(m1)(dm1+dm2)(m2),d0=1,d1=0, 1.23

and

dm=mdm1+(1)m(m1),d0=1(see [1–3]). 1.24

For rN, the derangement numbers dn(r) of order r (n0), are defined by the generating function

(11t)ret=n=0dn(r)tnn!(see [3]). 1.25

The umbral calculus comes under the heading of combinatorics, the calculus of finite differences, the theory of special functions, and formal solutions to differential equations. Also, formal power series play a predominant role in the umbral calculus. In this paper, we study the derangement polynomials and investigate some interesting properties which are related to derangement numbers. Further, we study two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and show some relations between them. In addition, we express several special polynomials in terms of the higher-order derangement polynomials by using umbral calculus.

Some identities of derangement polynomials arising from umbral calculus

Now, we define the derangement polynomials by

n=0dn(x)tnn!=11text. 2.1

We note here that, for x=1, dn=dn(1) are the derangement numbers.

We observe that

11text=elog(1t)ext=(m=0(1)m1m!(log(1t))m)(l=0xltll!)=(k=0(m=0k(1)kmS1(k,m))tkk!)(l=0xltll!)=n=0(k=0nm=0k(nk)(1)kmS1(k,m)xnk)tnn!. 2.2

By (2.1) and (2.2), we get

dn(x)=k=0nm=0k(nk)(1)kmS1(k,m)xnk(n0), 2.3

and

dn=k=0nm=0k(nk)(1)nmS1(k,m)(n0). 2.4

Therefore we obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1

For n0, we have

dn(x)=k=0nm=0k(nk)(1)kmS1(k,m)xnk

and

dn=k=0nm=0k(nk)(1)nmS1(k,m).

From (2.1), we have

n=0dn(x)tnn!=(11tet)e(x+1)t=(m=0dmtmm!)(l=0(x+1)ltll!)=n=0(m=0n(nm)dm(x+1)nm)tnn!. 2.5

Therefore, we obtain the following proposition.

Proposition 2.2

For n0, we have

dn(x)=m=0n(nm)dm(x+1)nm=(d+x+1)n,

with the usual convention about replacing dn by dn.

From Proposition 2.2, we have

ddxdn(x)=ddx(d+x+1)n=n(d+x+1)n1=ndn1(x)(n1). 2.6

By (1.5) and (2.1), we get

dn(x)(1t,t). 2.7

That is, dn(x) (n0) is an Appell sequence.

Now, we note that

n=0dn(x)tnn!=(11tet)e(x1)t=n=0(l=0n(nl)al(x1)nl)tnn!, 2.8

where an are the arrangement numbers defined by

11tet=n=0antnn!. 2.9

Replacing t by et1 in (2.1), we get

k=0dk(x)1k!(et1)k=(12et)ex(et1)=(l=0Hl(2)tll!)(m=0Belm(x)tmm!)=n=0(l=0n(nl)Hl(2)Belnl(x))tnn!. 2.10

On the other hand,

k=0dk(x)1k!(et1)k=k=0dk(x)n=kS2(n,k)tnn!=n=0(k=0nS2(n,k)dk(x))tnn!. 2.11

Therefore, by (2.10) and (2.11), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3

For n0, we have

k=0n(nk)Hk(2)Belnk(x)=k=0nS2(n,k)dk(x).

For Sn(x)(g(t),t), from (1.5) we have

1g(t)ext=n=0Sn(x)tnn!. 2.12

Thus, by (2.12), we get

1g(t)xn=Sn(x)(n0)Sn(x)(g(t),t). 2.13

In (2.13), we take g(t)=1t, then we have

11txn=dn(x)(n0),tdn(x)=ndn1(x)(n1). 2.14

Now, we observe that

dn(x+y)=(d+x+y+1)n=l=0n(nl)(d+x+1)lynl=l=0n(nl)dl(x)ynl(n0). 2.15

From (2.15), we note that

1n+1(dn+1(x+y)dn+1(x))=1n+1k=1n+1(n+1k)dn+1k(x)yk=k=1n+1n(n1)(nk+2)k!dn+1kyk=k=1n+1ykk!tk1dn(x). 2.16

By (2.15) and (2.16), we get

xx+ydn(u)du=k=1n+1ykk!tk1dn(x)=1tk=1n(nk)dnk(x)yk=1t(eytdn(x)dn(x))=1t(eyt1)dn(x)(n0). 2.17

From (2.17), we can derive the following equation.

dn(x)=tet1xx+1dn(u)du=11txn(n0). 2.18

Theorem 2.4

For n0, we have

dn(x)=tet1xx+1dn(u)du=11txn.

From (1.10), we have

eyt1t|dn(x)=eyt1|1n+1dn+1(x)=1|1n+1(dn+1(x+y)dn+1(x))=1n+1(dn+1(y)dn+1(0))=0ydn(u)du(n0). 2.19

In particular,

n=0dn(0)tnn!=(11tet)et=(l=0dltll!)(m=0tmm!)=n=0(l=0n(nl)dl)tnn!. 2.20

Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (1.17), we have

dn(0)=l=0n(nl)dl(n0). 2.21

Therefore, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 2.5

For n0, we have

dn(0)=l=0n(nl)dl

and

eyt1t|dn(x)=0ydn(u)du.

For rN, we define the derangement polynomials of order r by

(11t)rext=n=0dn(r)(x)tnn!. 2.22

When x=1, dn(r)(1)=dn(r) are the derangement numbers of order r.

For 0rn, the r-derangement numbers, denoted by Dn(r), are the number of derangements on n+r elements under the restriction that the first r-elements are in disjoint cycles. It is known that the generating function of the r-derangement numbers is given by

n=0Dn(r)tnn!=tr(1t)r+1et. 2.23

We consider the r-derangement polynomials given by

tr(1t)r+1ext=n=0Dn(r)(x)tnn!(0rn). 2.24

From (2.24), we note that Dn(r)(1)=Dn(r) are the r-derangement numbers. By (2.13) and (2.22), we easily get

dn(r)(x)((1t)r,t)(n0) 2.25

and

trdn(r)(x)=(n)rdnr(r)(x)=r!(nr)dnr(r)(x). 2.26

From (2.22) and (2.24), we have

n=0Dn(r)(x)tnn!=trn=0dn(r+1)(x)tnn!=n=r(nr)r!dnr(r+1)(x)tnn!. 2.27

Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (2.27), we get

Dn(r)(x)=(nr)r!dnr(r+1)(x)(nr). 2.28

From (2.22), we have

n=0dn(r)(0)tnn!=(11t)r=n=0(n+r1n)tn=n=0(n+r1)ntnn!. 2.29

Thus, by (2.29), we get

dn(r)(0)=(n+r1)n(n0). 2.30

From (2.22) and (2.24), we have

trn=0dn(r+1)(x)tnn!=tr(1t)r+1ete(x+1)t=(l=0Dl(r)tll!)(m=0(x+1)mtmm!)=n=0(l=0n(nl)Dl(r)(x+1)nl)tnn!. 2.31

Therefore, by (2.27) and (2.31), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.6

For nr, we have

l=0n(nl)Dl(r)(x+1)nl=(nr)r!dnr(r+1)(x).

Now, we observe that

tr1(1t)rext+tr(1t)r+1ext=tr1(1t)r+1ext=(tr1(1t)ret)(11tet)e(x+2)t=n=0(k=0nl=0k(nk)(kl)Dl(r1)dkl(x+2)nk)tnn!. 2.32

On the other hand, by (2.24), we get

tr1(1t)rext+tr(1t)r+1ext=n=0(Dn(r1)(x)+Dn(r)(x))tnn!. 2.33

From (2.32) and (2.33), we have

Dn(r1)(x)+Dn(r)(x)=k=0nl=0k(nk)(kl)Dl(r1)dkl(x+2)nk. 2.34

In particular, for x=1, we get

Dn(r1)+Dn(r)=k=0nl=0k(nk)(kl)Dl(r1)dkl. 2.35

Therefore, by (2.34) and (2.35), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.7

For n0, we have

Dn(r1)(x)+Dn(r)(x)=k=0nl=0k(nk)(kl)Dl(r1)dkl(x+2)nk.

Moreover,

Dn(r1)+Dn(r)=k=0nl=0k(nk)(kl)Dl(r1)dkl.

By (2.22), we easily get

n=0dn(r)(x)tnn!=(11t)rete(x+1)t=(l=0dl(r)tll!)(m=0(x+1)mtmm!)=n=0(l=0n(nl)dl(r)(x+1)nl)tnn!. 2.36

Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (2.36), we have

dn(r)(x)=l=0n(nl)dl(r)(x+1)nl, 2.37

with the usual convention about replacing (d(r))l by dl(r). Thus, by (2.37), we get

dn(r)(x+y)=(d(r)+x+y+1)n=(d(r)+x+1+y)n=l=0n(nl)(d(r)+x+1)lynl=l=0n(nl)dl(r)(x)ynl(n0). 2.38

From (2.22), we can derive the following equation:

n=0dn(r)(x)tnn!=(11t)rext=(11t)r1et(11t)e(x+1)t=(l=0dl(r1)tll!)(m=0dm(x+1)tmm!)=n=0(l=0n(nl)dl(r1)dnl(x+1))tnn!. 2.39

Thus, by (2.39), we get

dn(r)(x)=l=0n(nl)dl(r1)dnl(x+1)(n0). 2.40

For x=2, from (2.37) and (2.40) we have

dn(r)(2)=l=0n(nl)dl(r1)dnl=l=0n(nl)dl(r)(1)nl(n0). 2.41

From (2.17), we have

et1tdn(r)(x)=xx+1dn(r)(u)du=1n+1{dn+1(r)(x+1)dn+1(r)(x)}=1n+1{l=0n+1(n+1l)dl(r)(x)dn+1(r)(x)}=1n+1l=0n(n+1l)dl(r)(x)=1n+1l=1n+1(n+1l)dn+1l(r)(x)(n0). 2.42

By (2.37) and (2.42), we get

dn(r)(x)=1n+1l=1n+1m=0n+1l(n+1l)(n+1lm)dm(r)tet1(x+1)n+1lm=1n+1l=1n+1m=0n+1l(n+1l)(n+1lm)dm(r)Bm+1lm(x+1). 2.43

Therefore, by (2.43), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.8

For n0, we have

dn(r)(x)=1n+1l=1n+1m=0n+1l(n+1l)(n+1lm)dm(r)Bm+1lm(x+1).

For n0, let

Pn={p(x)C[x]|degp(x)n}.

Then Pn is an (n+1)-dimensional vector space over C.

For p(x)Pn, we let

p(x)=k=0nCkdk(x). 2.44

From (1.4), we have

(1t)tk|p(x)=l=0nCl(1t)tk|dl(x)=l=0nCll!δk,l=Ckk!(k0). 2.45

Thus, we have

Ck=1k!(1t)tk|p(x)=1k!(1t)|p(k)(x). 2.46

Therefore, by (2.44) and (2.46), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.9

For p(x)Pn, we have

p(x)=k=0nCkdk(x),

where Ck=1k!(1t)tk|p(x)=1k!(1t)|p(k)(x).

Let us take p(x)=dn(r)(x)Pn. Then we have

p(x)=l=0nCldl(x), 2.47

where

Cl=1l!1t|p(l)(x)=1l!1t|(n)ldnl(r)(x)=(nl)1t|dnl(r)(x)=(nl)dnl(r)(0)(nl+1)(l+1)dnl1(r)(0). 2.48

Hence, by (2.47) and (2.48), we get

dn(r)(x)=l=0n{(nl)dnl(r)(0)(nl+1)(l+1)dnl1(r)(0)}dl(x).

Assume that p(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x)Pn. Then, by (2.25), we get

(1t)rtk|p(x)=l=0nCl(r)(!t)rtk|dl(r)(x)=l=0nCl(r)l!δl,k=Ck(r)k!(k0). 2.49

Thus, from (2.49), we note that

Ck(r)=1k!(1t)rtk|p(x)=1k!(1t)r|p(k)(x). 2.50

Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.10

For n0, we have

p(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x)Pn,

where

Ck=1k!(1t)rtk|p(x)=1k!(1t)r|p(k)(x).

Example 1

For p(x)=dn(x)Pn, we have

p(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x),

where

Ck(r)=1k!(1t)r|p(k)(x)=(nk)(1t)r|dnk(x)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)jtj|dnk(x)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nk)jdnkj(0)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nk)j(nkj)!=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nk)!.

Thus, we note that

dn(x)=k=0n(j=0r(nk)(nk)!(rj)(1)j)dk(r)(x).

Example 2

For p(x)=Bn(x) (n0), we have

Bn(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x),

where

Ck(r)=1k!(1t)rtk|Bn(x)=(nk)(1t)r|Bnk(x)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)jtj|Bnk(x)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nk)j1|Bnkj(x)=(nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nkj)j!Bnkj.

Hence

Bn(x)=k=0n((nk)j=0r(rj)(1)j(nkj)j!Bnkj)dk(r)(x).

Example 3

For p(x)=En(x)Pn (n0), we have

En(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x),

where

Ck(r)=1k!(1t)tk|En(x)=(nk)(1t)|Enk(x)=(nk)Enk(nk)(nk)Enk1.

Thus, we get

En(x)=k=0n{(nk)Enk(nk)(nk)Enk1}dk(r)(x).

Example 4

For p(x)=Beln(x)Pn, we have

Beln(x)=k=0nCk(r)dk(r)(x),

where

Ck(r)=1k!(1t)tk|Beln(x)=1k!(1t)tk|m=0nS2(n,m)xm=m=knS2(n,m)(mk)(1t)|xmk=S2(n,k)m=knS2(n,m)(mk)(mk)0mk1=S2(n,k)S2(n,k+1)(k+1)=2S2(n,k)S2(n+1,k+1).

Hence

Beln(x)=k=0n(2S2(n,k)S2(n+1,k+1))dk(r)(x).

The ordered Bell polynomials are defined by the generating function

12etext=n=0bn(x)tnn!. 2.51

When x=0, bn=bn(0) (n0) are the ordered Bell numbers. From (2.12) and (2.51), we note that bn(x)(2et,t) (n0). For bn(x)(2et,t), dn(x)(1t,t), by (2.7) and (2.13), we get

bn(x)=m=0nCn,mdm(x)(n0), 2.52

where

Cn,m=1m!1t2ettm|xn=(nm)1t2et|xnm=(nm)1t|12etxnm=(nm)1t|bnm(x)=(nm){bnm(nm)bnm1}. 2.53

Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.11

For n0, we have

bn(x)=m=0n(nm)(bnm(nm)bnm1)dm(x).

For dn(x)(1t,t), (x)n(1,et1), we have

dn(x)=m=0nCn,m(x)m(n0), 2.54

where

Cn,m=1m!11t(et1)m|xn=l=mnS2(l,m)1l!tl1t|xn=l=mnS2(l,m)(nl)11t|xnl=l=mnS2(l,m)(nl)1|dnl(x)=l=mnS2(l,m)(nl)dnl(0). 2.55

Therefore, by (2.54) and (2.55), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.12

For n0, we have

dn(x)=m=0n(l=mnS2(l,m)(nl)dnl(0))(x)m.

Results and discussion

In this paper, as a natural companion to derangement numbers, we have investigated derangement polynomials and derived several interesting properties on them which are related to derangement numbers. Also, we have considered two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely the higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and showed some relations between them and also with some other special polynomials. In addition, by using umbral calculus, we derived a formula expressing any polynomials as linear combinations of higher-order derangement polynomials and illustrated this with several special polynomials.

Conclusion

The introduction of derangement numbers goes back to as early as 1708 when Pierre Rémond de Montmort considered some counting problem on derangements. However, it seems that the umbral calculus approach to the derangement polynomials and their generalizations has not yet been done. In this paper, we have used umbral calculus in order to study some interesting properties on them, certain relations between them, and some connections with several other special polynomials.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2017R1E1A1A03070882).

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Taekyun Kim, Email: tkkim@kw.ac.kr.

Dae San Kim, Email: dskim@sogang.ac.kr.

Gwan-Woo Jang, Email: jgw5687@naver.com.

Jongkyum Kwon, Email: mathkjk26@gnu.ac.kr.

References

  • 1.Carlitz L. The number of derangements of a sequence with given specification. Fibonacci Q. 1978;16(3):255–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clarke R.J., Sved M. Derangements and Bell numbers. Math. Mag. 1993;66(5):299–303. doi: 10.2307/2690504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim D.S., Kim T., Kwon H.-I. Fourier series for r-derangement and higher-order derangement functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018;28(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dere R., Simsek Y. Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2012;22(3):433–438. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim D.S., Kim T., Ryoo C.S. Sheffer sequences for the powers of Sheffer pairs under umbral composition. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2013;23(2):275–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim T., Kim D.S. On λ-Bell polynomials associated with umbral calculus. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2017;24(1):69–78. doi: 10.1134/S1061920817010058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim T., Kim D.S., Jang G.-W., Jang L.-C. Degenerate ordered Bell numbers and polynomials associated with umbral calculus. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017;10(10):5142–5155. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.10.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roman S. The Umbral Calculus. New York: Academic Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim T., Kim D.S., Jang G.-W. Some formulas of ordered Bell numbers and polynomials arising from umbral calculus. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2017;20(4):659–670. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bayad A., Kim T. Identities for the Bernoulli, the Euler and the Genocchi numbers and polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2010;20(2):247–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ding D., Yang J. Some identities related to the Apostol–Euler and Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2010;20(1):7–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.He Y., Kim T. General convolution identities for Apostol–Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016;9(6):4780–4797. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.009.06.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simsek Y. Generating functions of the twisted Bernoulli numbers and polynomials associated with their interpolation functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2008;16(2):251–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwasniewski A.K. On Ψ-umbral extensions of Stirling numbers and Dobinski-like formulas. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2006;12(1):73–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim T. Identities involving Laguerre polynomials derived from umbral calculus. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2014;21(3):584–589. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Inequalities and Applications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES