Abstract
The problem of counting derangements was initiated by Pierre Rémond de Montmort in 1708 (see Carlitz in Fibonacci Q. 16(3):255–258, 1978, Clarke and Sved in Math. Mag. 66(5):299–303, 1993, Kim, Kim and Kwon in Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 28(1):1–11 2018. A derangement is a permutation that has no fixed points, and the derangement number is the number of fixed-point-free permutations on an n element set. In this paper, we study the derangement polynomials and investigate some interesting properties which are related to derangement numbers. Also, we study two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and show some relations between them. In addition, we express several special polynomials in terms of the higher-order derangement polynomials by using umbral calculus.
Keywords: Derangement numbers, Derangement polynomials, r-derangement numbers, r-derangement polynomials, Umbral calculus
Introduction
Let be the complex number field, and let be the set of all formal power series in the variable t with coefficients in :
| 1.1 |
Let , and let be the vector space of all linear functionals on . We denote the action of a linear functional on polynomials by , and it is known that vector space operations on are defined by
| 1.2 |
where c is a complex constant (see [3–5]).
For , we define a linear functional on by setting
| 1.3 |
From (1.3), we note that
| 1.4 |
where is the Kronecker symbol.
The order of a power series is the smallest integer k such that the coefficients of do not vanish. For , with and , there exists a unique sequence of polynomials such that for (see [5, 8]). The sequence is called the Sheffer sequence for , which is denoted by . It is known that if and only if
| 1.5 |
where is the compositional inverse of with
| 1.6 |
For and , by (1.4), we get
| 1.7 |
From (1.7), we note that
| 1.8 |
where .
From (1.8), we easily get
| 1.9 |
Let and (). Then we have
| 1.10 |
where
| 1.11 |
For , the Frobenius-Euler numbers are defined by the generating function
| 1.12 |
When , are the ordinary Euler numbers.
The Bernoulli polynomials are given by
| 1.13 |
When , are the Bernoulli numbers.
We know that the Euler polynomials are defined by
| 1.14 |
When , are the Euler numbers.
The falling factorial sequence is defined as
| 1.15 |
The Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined by
| 1.16 |
and the Stirling numbers of the second kind are given by
| 1.17 |
The Stirling numbers of the second kind are also given by the exponential generating function (see [8, p.59])
| 1.18 |
It is well known that the Bell polynomials are defined by the generating function
| 1.19 |
When , () are the Bell numbers.
From (1.19), we have
| 1.20 |
A derangement is a permutation that has no fixed points. The derangement number is the number of fixed-point-free permutations on an n element set (see [1–3]). The problem of counting derangements was initiated by Pierre Rémond de Montmort in 1708 (see [1–3]). The first few terms of the derangement number sequence are , , , , , , , , … .
Indeed, is given by the closed form formula:
| 1.21 |
From (1.21), we note that the generating function of derangement numbers is given by
| 1.22 |
By using (1.22), it is not difficult to show that
| 1.23 |
and
| 1.24 |
For , the derangement numbers of order r (), are defined by the generating function
| 1.25 |
The umbral calculus comes under the heading of combinatorics, the calculus of finite differences, the theory of special functions, and formal solutions to differential equations. Also, formal power series play a predominant role in the umbral calculus. In this paper, we study the derangement polynomials and investigate some interesting properties which are related to derangement numbers. Further, we study two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and show some relations between them. In addition, we express several special polynomials in terms of the higher-order derangement polynomials by using umbral calculus.
Some identities of derangement polynomials arising from umbral calculus
Now, we define the derangement polynomials by
| 2.1 |
We note here that, for , are the derangement numbers.
We observe that
| 2.2 |
| 2.3 |
and
| 2.4 |
Therefore we obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1
For , we have
and
From (2.1), we have
| 2.5 |
Therefore, we obtain the following proposition.
Proposition 2.2
For , we have
with the usual convention about replacing by .
From Proposition 2.2, we have
| 2.6 |
| 2.7 |
That is, () is an Appell sequence.
Now, we note that
| 2.8 |
where are the arrangement numbers defined by
| 2.9 |
Replacing t by in (2.1), we get
| 2.10 |
On the other hand,
| 2.11 |
Therefore, by (2.10) and (2.11), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3
For , we have
For , from (1.5) we have
| 2.12 |
Thus, by (2.12), we get
| 2.13 |
In (2.13), we take , then we have
| 2.14 |
Now, we observe that
| 2.15 |
From (2.15), we note that
| 2.16 |
| 2.17 |
From (2.17), we can derive the following equation.
| 2.18 |
Theorem 2.4
For , we have
From (1.10), we have
| 2.19 |
In particular,
| 2.20 |
Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (1.17), we have
| 2.21 |
Therefore, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2.5
For , we have
and
For , we define the derangement polynomials of order r by
| 2.22 |
When , are the derangement numbers of order r.
For , the r-derangement numbers, denoted by , are the number of derangements on elements under the restriction that the first r-elements are in disjoint cycles. It is known that the generating function of the r-derangement numbers is given by
| 2.23 |
We consider the r-derangement polynomials given by
| 2.24 |
From (2.24), we note that are the r-derangement numbers. By (2.13) and (2.22), we easily get
| 2.25 |
and
| 2.26 |
From (2.22) and (2.24), we have
| 2.27 |
Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (2.27), we get
| 2.28 |
From (2.22), we have
| 2.29 |
Thus, by (2.29), we get
| 2.30 |
From (2.22) and (2.24), we have
| 2.31 |
Therefore, by (2.27) and (2.31), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.6
For , we have
Now, we observe that
| 2.32 |
On the other hand, by (2.24), we get
| 2.33 |
From (2.32) and (2.33), we have
| 2.34 |
In particular, for , we get
| 2.35 |
Therefore, by (2.34) and (2.35), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.7
For , we have
Moreover,
By (2.22), we easily get
| 2.36 |
Comparing the coefficients on both sides of (2.36), we have
| 2.37 |
with the usual convention about replacing by . Thus, by (2.37), we get
| 2.38 |
From (2.22), we can derive the following equation:
| 2.39 |
Thus, by (2.39), we get
| 2.40 |
For , from (2.37) and (2.40) we have
| 2.41 |
From (2.17), we have
| 2.42 |
| 2.43 |
Therefore, by (2.43), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.8
For , we have
For , let
Then is an -dimensional vector space over .
For , we let
| 2.44 |
From (1.4), we have
| 2.45 |
Thus, we have
| 2.46 |
Therefore, by (2.44) and (2.46), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.9
For , we have
where .
Let us take . Then we have
| 2.47 |
where
| 2.48 |
Hence, by (2.47) and (2.48), we get
Assume that . Then, by (2.25), we get
| 2.49 |
Thus, from (2.49), we note that
| 2.50 |
Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.10
For , we have
where
Example 1
For , we have
where
Thus, we note that
Example 2
For (), we have
where
Hence
Example 3
For (), we have
where
Thus, we get
Example 4
For , we have
where
Hence
The ordered Bell polynomials are defined by the generating function
| 2.51 |
When , () are the ordered Bell numbers. From (2.12) and (2.51), we note that (). For , , by (2.7) and (2.13), we get
| 2.52 |
where
| 2.53 |
Therefore, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.11
For , we have
For , , we have
| 2.54 |
where
| 2.55 |
Therefore, by (2.54) and (2.55), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.12
For , we have
Results and discussion
In this paper, as a natural companion to derangement numbers, we have investigated derangement polynomials and derived several interesting properties on them which are related to derangement numbers. Also, we have considered two generalizations of derangement polynomials, namely the higher-order and r-derangement polynomials, and showed some relations between them and also with some other special polynomials. In addition, by using umbral calculus, we derived a formula expressing any polynomials as linear combinations of higher-order derangement polynomials and illustrated this with several special polynomials.
Conclusion
The introduction of derangement numbers goes back to as early as 1708 when Pierre Rémond de Montmort considered some counting problem on derangements. However, it seems that the umbral calculus approach to the derangement polynomials and their generalizations has not yet been done. In this paper, we have used umbral calculus in order to study some interesting properties on them, certain relations between them, and some connections with several other special polynomials.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2017R1E1A1A03070882).
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Taekyun Kim, Email: tkkim@kw.ac.kr.
Dae San Kim, Email: dskim@sogang.ac.kr.
Gwan-Woo Jang, Email: jgw5687@naver.com.
Jongkyum Kwon, Email: mathkjk26@gnu.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Carlitz L. The number of derangements of a sequence with given specification. Fibonacci Q. 1978;16(3):255–258. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clarke R.J., Sved M. Derangements and Bell numbers. Math. Mag. 1993;66(5):299–303. doi: 10.2307/2690504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim D.S., Kim T., Kwon H.-I. Fourier series for r-derangement and higher-order derangement functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018;28(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dere R., Simsek Y. Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2012;22(3):433–438. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim D.S., Kim T., Ryoo C.S. Sheffer sequences for the powers of Sheffer pairs under umbral composition. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2013;23(2):275–285. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim T., Kim D.S. On λ-Bell polynomials associated with umbral calculus. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2017;24(1):69–78. doi: 10.1134/S1061920817010058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim T., Kim D.S., Jang G.-W., Jang L.-C. Degenerate ordered Bell numbers and polynomials associated with umbral calculus. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017;10(10):5142–5155. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.010.10.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roman S. The Umbral Calculus. New York: Academic Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim T., Kim D.S., Jang G.-W. Some formulas of ordered Bell numbers and polynomials arising from umbral calculus. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2017;20(4):659–670. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bayad A., Kim T. Identities for the Bernoulli, the Euler and the Genocchi numbers and polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2010;20(2):247–253. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ding D., Yang J. Some identities related to the Apostol–Euler and Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2010;20(1):7–21. [Google Scholar]
- 12.He Y., Kim T. General convolution identities for Apostol–Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016;9(6):4780–4797. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.009.06.115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simsek Y. Generating functions of the twisted Bernoulli numbers and polynomials associated with their interpolation functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2008;16(2):251–278. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kwasniewski A.K. On Ψ-umbral extensions of Stirling numbers and Dobinski-like formulas. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2006;12(1):73–100. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim T. Identities involving Laguerre polynomials derived from umbral calculus. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2014;21(3):584–589. [Google Scholar]
