Skip to main content
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism logoLink to Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
. 2018 Jan 8;2018:6352919. doi: 10.1155/2018/6352919

Comparison of Glycomacropeptide with Phenylalanine Free-Synthetic Amino Acids in Test Meals to PKU Patients: No Significant Differences in Biomarkers, Including Plasma Phe Levels

Kirsten K Ahring 1,2,3,, Allan M Lund 2,3, Erik Jensen 4, Thomas G Jensen 5, Karen Brøndum-Nielsen 1, Michael Pedersen 6, Allan Bardow 7, Jens Juul Holst 8, Jens F Rehfeld 9, Lisbeth B Møller 2
PMCID: PMC5817308  PMID: 29511574

Abstract

Introduction

Management of phenylketonuria (PKU) is achieved through low-phenylalanine (Phe) diet, supplemented with low-protein food and mixture of free-synthetic (FS) amino acid (AA). Casein glycomacropeptide (CGMP) is a natural peptide released in whey during cheese-making and does not contain Phe. Lacprodan® CGMP-20 used in this study contained a small amount of Phe due to minor presence of other proteins/peptides.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare absorption of CGMP-20 to FSAA with the aim of evaluating short-term effects on plasma AAs as well as biomarkers related to food intake.

Methods

This study included 8 patients, who had four visits and tested four drink mixtures (DM1–4), consisting of CGMP, FSAA, or a combination. Plasma blood samples were collected at baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes (min) after the meal. AA profiles and ghrelin were determined 6 times, while surrogate biomarkers were determined at baseline and 240 min. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for evaluation of taste and satiety.

Results

The surrogate biomarker concentrations and VAS scores for satiety and taste were nonsignificant between the four DMs, and there were only few significant results for AA profiles (not Phe).

Conclusion

CGMP and FSAA had the overall same nonsignificant short-term effect on biomarkers, including Phe. This combination of FSAA and CGMP is a suitable supplement for PKU patients.

1. Introduction

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of metabolism. If left untreated, severe brain damage will occur [13]. The primary aim of treatment of those suffering from PKU is to control the blood phenylalanine (Phe) concentration in order to prevent neurological damage [2]. PKU treatment is based on a low-protein (LP) diet in combination with free-synthetic (FS) amino acid (AA) supplements without Phe and enriched with vitamins, minerals, trace elements, and in some products also fat and carbohydrates [1, 4, 5]. Dietary AA supplements are administered to obtain optimal metabolic control by ensuring adequate levels of essential AAs. Diet for life is recommended [6]. Compliance becomes a challenge over time, especially in adolescence, and they are often related to disagreeable taste and the current limitations in available dietary products [7, 8]. In order to achieve better compliance, the formulation of the AA supplement should satisfy the need for better taste and easier management [9]. Therefore, alternatives to conventional treatment are investigated.

Casein glycomacropeptide (CGMP) is a 64-amino acid peptide from cheese whey, which is rich in specific essential AAs and is the only known natural protein free from Phe [1014]. Hence, CGMP is an alternative source of protein for PKU patients. In this study, we tested the product Lacprodan CGMP-20, a highly purified CGMP product with minimum 95% CGMP and a low level of Phe (0.16 g/100 g AA) and above 78% protein. The residual amount of Phe is due to the presence of minor amounts of other proteins/peptides. However, to ensure the supplement is nutritionally adequate, it requires supplementation of the following AAs to meet the standards of similar PKU supplements: tyrosine (Tyr), tryptophan (Trp), arginine (Arg), histidine (His), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), and methionine (Met) [1517]. Lacprodan CGMP-20 will be referred to as CGMP in this paper.

In this single-blinded, prospective, crossover intervention study, we investigated the utilization and metabolic short-term effect on absorption of pure CGMP-20, FSAA, and a combination of both, all consumed with a standardized meal, by comparing selected relevant surrogate biomarkers. We also evaluated taste and satiety. A second aim was to investigate whether the small amount of Phe in CGMP-20 affected the plasma Phe concentration significantly.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Protocol

The study was approved by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics prior to the study (ID H-3-2014-115), and all participants gave written consent prior to start of the study.

2.2. Patient Recruitment

Patients were contacted by mail and invited to participate. They were recruited from the clinical PKU database, including all PKU patients diagnosed and living in Denmark. Patients received compensation for lost wages and travel expenses. Participants in the project were invited to participate if they met the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of classical PKU confirmed by mutation analysis and a known phe tolerance (12–20 mg/kg) [1820], age ≥ 15 years at inclusion, had received treatment with a protein-restricted diet since the neonatal period, and were willing and able to visit the PKU clinic four times. The period between visits varied from 24 hours to 1 month, since we estimated this to be sufficient time for a wash-out period [21, 22]. Exclusion criteria were (1) <15 years at inclusion, (2) had not followed the dietary treatment continuously, (3) had a second chronic disease or condition, which potentially could influence the PKU treatment and outcome, (4) treated with BH4, or (5) pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant. Eight patients accepted to participate.

2.3. Study Design

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the absorption rate and absorbed amount of peptide-bound AAs (CGMP-20) (both in its pure form or supplemented with selected FSAAs) with an almost identical mixture of FSAAs with the aim of evaluating the short-term effect on Phe and other AAs as well as biomarkers related to food intake. All patients had four visits in the PKU clinic. The patients consumed a different drink mixture (DM1, DM2, DM3, and DM4) in random order at each visit (blinded to the participants). The order of the DM was randomized by a doctor at the PKU clinic, who was not otherwise involved in the study. CGMP/AA supplements: four different AA sources were tested. DM1: Lacprodan CGMP-20. DM2: FSAA (equivalent AA profile as DM1). DM3: Lacprodan CGMP-20 and synthetic AA. DM4: FSAA (equivalent AA profile as DM3 but without Phe). DM2 had the same AA profile as DM1 consisting of pure CGMP in order to evaluate this; DM3 consisted of CGMP supplemented with FSAA to make it nutritionally adequate and suitable for patients with PKU and had a similar AA profile as DM4 (though this was without the 0.16 g Phe/100 g AA present in CGMP). The crossover study design made it possible to evaluate the effect of the Phe content in GMP. Patients arrived fasting to the clinic in the morning and then subjected to the first venous blood samples (4 ml) at time 0. Subsequently, blood samples were drawn at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes (min) after finishing the meal. Taste was evaluated right after consumption. At the end of the visit, all participants were asked to evaluate satiety.

The test meals consisted of a few selected food items (homemade LP bread, butter, and jam) with individually calculated amounts of fat and carbohydrates and only a minimal content of protein and Phe from LP bread. The test meal was consumed in combination with DM, and the individual intake was designed to cover 25% of the daily requirement. In each meal, the total content of protein was equivalent to 25% of 1 g per kg body weight per day (1 g/kg/d). The composition of the meal was calculated after the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNA) and met the criteria for sex, age, and weight: 10–15% from protein, 30–35% from fat, and 50–60% from carbohydrate. After completing the trial, all participants would continue their usual diet and AA supplements. An example of a meal is shown in Table 1, and the content of DM1–4 is given in Table 2.

Table 1.

Example of a test breakfast meal including DM (calculated individually for each participant).

DM (CGMP-20, AA, or CGMP+AA)
2 slices (80 g) of LP bread
Butter (20 g)
Jam (20 g)

Table 2.

Content of pure CGMP (g AA/100 g p) and DM1–4 (pr. 1000 g mixture) (CGMP and free-synthetic AA). DM1: 100% CGMP: 158.46 g = the content of each AA displayed below. DM2: 100% FSAA (the total amount of AA is shown below). DM3: 119.04 g from CGMP (+AA = the additional amount of AA from FSAA). DM4: 100% FSAA.

CGMP-20 AA DM1: Lacprodan CGMP-20: 158.46 g DM2: FSAA DM3: Lacprodan CGMP-20: 119.04 g + FSAA DM4: FSAA
g AA/100 g protein Total amount of AA (g)
6.4 Ala 8.57 8.40 6.44 6.31
0.3 Arg 0.44 0.43 4.85 4.85
9.2 Asp 12.08 11.83 9.07 8.89
0.08 Cys 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11
21.1 Glu 26.53 25.99 19.93 19.52
1.2 Gly 1.53 1.50 1.15 1.13
0.2 His 0.16 0.16 3.0 3.04
11.5 Ile 14.50 14.21 10.89 10.67
2.5 Leu 3.12 3.06 12.11 12.06
6.4 Lys 8.46 8.29 7.37 7.24
2 Met 2.92 2.85 3.62 3.57
0.2 Phe 0.20 0.20 0.15 0
12.6 Pro 16.45 16.11 12.36 12.10
8.5 Ser 10.46 10.25 7.86 7.70
18.1 Thr 23.62 23.14 17.74 17.38
0.04 Trp 0.00 2.44 2.44
0.06 Tyr 0.05 0.05 10.81 10.81
9.5 Val 11.76 11.52 8.83 8.65
Citric acid powder 14.40 1.40
Citric acid solution (50% w/w in water) 11.20
Tropical twist flavour (IFF SC401962) 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.80
Sucrose 73.00 73.00 80.00 80.00
Water 755.59 787.12 751.95 780.17
109.88 Total 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
DM 1 2 3 4
81 Protein equivalent (g/100 g) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Carbohydrate (g/100 g) 7.46 7.30 8.12 8.00
Fat (g/100 g) 0.03 0 0.02 0
Energy (kcal/100 g) 78 77 81 80

Part of the AA content comes from CGMP and part comes from additional FSAA: Arg: 0.33 (CGMP) + 4.52 (AA) = 4.85, His 0.12 (CGMP) + 2.92 (AA) = 3.04, Leu: 2.35 (CGMP) + 9.76 (AA) = 12.11, Lys: 6.36 (CGMP) + 1.01 (AA) = 7.37, Met: 2.19 (CGMP) + 1.43 (AA) = 3.62, Trp: 0.00 (CGMP) + 2.44 (AA) = 2.44, Tyr: 0.04 (CGMP) + 10.77 (AA) = 10.81.

2.4. Blood Samples

All participants had the following blood samples drawn at start (time 0) before consuming the meal/DM and at the end of the study (240 min): glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), cholecystokinin (CCK), ghrelin, and AA profiles. Furthermore, ghrelin and AA profiles were (besides at time 0) also measured at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min.

2.4.1. BUN, Glucose, Insulin, Ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY, and CCK

2–4 ml of blood was collected for each biomarker and handled immediately according to protocols [2328], placed on ice, spinned at 2500 g for 10 min at 4°C, and transferred to specific glasses for further analyses. EDTA glasses for (1) GLP-1 were added 200 µl DPP-IV inhibitor and for (2) ghrelin were added 100 µl Pefabloc by using a 0.5 ml syringe The samples for the total plasma AA profile were frozen at −80°C and sent on dry ice for quantitative analysis of AA using the stable-isotope dilution technique and HPLC-MS/MS [29].

2.5. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

This scale (http://www.vastranslator.com) was presented to patients as a horizontal line, ranking from “very hungry” (“0”) to “very satisfied” (“100”) and from “bad taste” (“0”) to “good taste” (“100”) as an application (APP) on iPad. The patients were asked to evaluate the taste of the DM shortly after intake and after 240 min to determine the level of satiety.

2.6. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Fat Percentage

These were measured at visit 1 with a body fat monitor (BF306, Omron Healthcare, USA).

2.7. Diet Registration

The patients had filled out a dietary record covering the 24 hours before each visit. They were instructed to eat similar food items every time to ensure that the Phe level would be within the same range the day after. The registrations were calculated with Dankost (http://dankost.dk/english).

2.8. Statistical Methods

All calculations were performed using the software SPSS 22 or Microsoft Excel 2010 for windows. Paired and unpaired t-tests and one- and two-way ANOVA performed at a significance level of α = 0.05 were used. The statistical significance level was at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Protocol

Eight patients (seven females, one male), age 15–48 years (mean 33.25 ± SD 11.21), weight 47–85 kg (mean 72.8 + SD 15.9), and height 162–179 cm (mean 170.1 + SD 5.4) were included in the study. Data for each patient are presented in Table 3. Six out of eight (75%) patients completed the study. Patient ID#4 had difficulties eating the meal within 15 min at visit one, which subsequently delayed blood sampling up to 10 min for each blood sample. Patient ID#4 completed day 1 and day 2 as planned, but on the third day, blood sampling was impossible, and for that reason, visit 4 was cancelled and the patient excluded. Patient ID#5 completed visit 1 and visit 2 but was unable to complete day 3 and day 4 due to health problems.

Table 3.

Patient data, all with classic PKU: age, mutations, height, weight, BMI, and usual AA supplement.

Patient ID# Age Mutation 1 Mutation 2 Phenotype Height (cm) Weight (kg) BMI Usual AA product
1 48 c.1315+1G>A1 c.1315+1G>A1 Classic PKU 169 85 30 PreKUnil tablets
2 27 c.1315+1G>A1 c.1222C>T2 Classic PKU 174 62 20 XPhe energy
3 18 c.842C>T3 c.1315+1G>A1 Classic PKU 171 75 26 Avonil powder
4 16 c.1222C>T2 c.1315+1G>A1 Classic PKU 171 47 16 Avonil tablets
5 38 c.1315+1G>A1 c.1222C>T2 Classic PKU 179 79 25 PreKUnil tablets
6 46 c.814G>T4 c.1222C>T2 Classic PKU 173 94 31 PreKUnil tablets
7 34 c.473G>A5 c.1315+1G>A1 Classic PKU 162 53 20 PreKUnil tablets
8 39 c.1222C>T2 c.1222C>T2 Classic PKU 162 87.5 33 Avonil tablets

1(IVS12+1G>A); 2p.R408W; 3p.E280K; 4p.G272X; 5p.R158Q.

3.2. Diet Registration

The 24-hour diet record confirmed similar intake for each patient prior to the four test days.

3.3. Test Meals and DM

Intake of protein from DM supplement was 25% of the daily recommendation of 1 g protein/kg/day (mean volume 151.8 g (range 97.9–195.8)), and the test meal provided fat and carbohydrates (Table 4). All patients complied with the intake.

Table 4.

Intake of DM (water + CGMP mixture powder = total volume) and standard meal in grams (g) and energy (kilojoule (kJ) and energy % (E %)).

Patient ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mean SD
Powder (g) 41 30 36 21 38 45 27 44 35 8
Water (g) 136 99 120 77 126 151 83 139 116 25
LP bread (g) 70 90 170 100 82 70 96 80 95 30
Butter (g) 23 23 35 26 21 21 23 19 24 5
Marmalade (g) 40 40 40 42 40 40 40 40 40 1
Energy (kJ) 2324 2330 3445 2405 2324 2327 2316 2322 2474 368
Protein (g) 22 16 20 13 20 24 14 23 19 4
Protein E (%) 16 12 10 9 15 18 10 17 13 3
Fat (g) 20 20 32 23 19 18 21 18 21 4
Fat E (%) 32 33 34 35 30 29 33 28 32 2
Carbohydrate (g) 70 75 111 78 74 71 76 74 79 12
Carbohydrate E (%) 52 56 56 57 55 53 57 56 55 2

3.4. AA Profiles

AA profiles were compared in subgroups (DM1 versus DM2 and DM3 versus DM4), since the respective groups were identical concerning the AA composition. Statistical results were calculated between these subgroups.

The area under the curve (AUC) (adjusted for baseline) for total AA demonstrated insignificant differences between DM1 and DM2 (p =0.852) as well as between DM3 and DM4 (p=0.06).

We did find significant differences for the following individual AA for AUC: DM1 and DM2: Lys (p=0.0287), Asn (p =0.0210), and Asp (p =0.0047) and DM3 and DM4: citrulline (p =0.0162). Results for all the AUC for each AA are presented in Table 5. The highest value for the AUC for the individual AA was Ala, Val, Ile, and Asp (DM1), Pro (DM2), and Leu (DM3).

Table 5.

Results for the AUC (µmol/l over time) for all AAs (adjusted for baseline (time 0)). Significant differences for the following AAs for the area under the curve (AUC) minus baseline: DM1 and 2: Lys (p =0.0287), Asn (p =0.0201), and Asp (p =0.0046) and DM3 and 4: citrulline (p =0.0162).

DM 1 2 3 4
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Gly −1145 12734 11361 20714 −16590 15386 11709 9483
Ala 38797 10277 29471 5292 8397 3693 20653 5239
Ser 8021 2312 6262 680 −1264 2222 2180 1230
Pro 28232 3802 33492 7623 9353 2444 15950 2204
Val 46664 5818 33878 7511 14370 5722 24624 7244
Thr 38627 7843 35865 3144 13558 1338 20698 2662
Leu −3102 499 −2979 786 6899 1798 5206 1564
Ile 26638 2253 21551 1691 9666 1474 8429 1146
Lys 16623 3356 5005 3255 3932 2076 7342 2542
Asn 3036 688 910 409 1838 978 1129 652
Met 1976 580 1848 230 842 429 3026 1961
His −419 768 −1133 677 −1036 1151 1003 697
Phe −6717 11135 −2778 6468 −24356 10869 −8944 9170
Tyr −3376 592 −4000 649 6672 1012 6019 1622
Glu 123 399 −305 541 −2302 1004 −988 782
Gln 34247 7716 39614 10878 −4902 4414 9870 7528
Asp 1399 413 −254 239 −682 490 −469 217
Trp −1364 403 −1078 412 804 849 994 484
Orn 1167 818 733 621 799 724 1288 304
Arg −505 1292 −100 1136 −1121 1310 1047 941
Cit −1115 634 790 647 −2193 549 305 652

3.5. Plasma Concentrations of AA

The peak plasma concentrations for AAs (given as mean values in percentage of the premeal level) were as follows: DM1: the peak serum concentrations were reached after 30 min for 19 of 21(90%) AAs. Glu reached a peak after 15 min; Tyr only decreased compared to baseline. DM2: four AAs peaked after 30 min, while 15 (71%) AAs peaked after 15 min. Citrulline peaked after 60 min; Tyr decreased compared to time 0. DM3: majority of the AAs peaked after 30 min (67%) except for Asp, Met, and Gln, where the peaks were reached after 15 min. Phe, Glu, citrulline, and Gly all decreased compared to baseline. DM4: fifteen AAs (71%) peaked after 15 min, only five after 30 min, while citrulline peaked after 60 min. All results are displayed in Table 6.

Table 6.

Plasma concentrations (µmol/l) after intake of the DM and test meal for all AAs presented as % compared to time 0 (=1). Comparison between DM1+2 and DM3+4 gave the following results: time 15: DM1+2: Tyr: 0.0228, Asp: 0.0136, citrulline: 0.0378; DM3+4: Pro: 0.0455, Val: 0.0204, Thr: 0.0239; time 30: DM1+2: Leu: 0.0178, Ile: 0.0021, Asn: 0.0038, Asp: 0.0362; DM3+4: Ser: 0.0031, Pro: 0.0486, Thr: 0.0027, His: 0.0108, Tyr: 0.0412, citrulline: 0.0409; time 60: DM1+2: Asp: 0.0060, citrulline: 0.0100; DM3+4: Pro: 0.0003, Val: 0.0088, Thr: 0.0270, Asp: 0.0155; time 120: DM3+4: citrulline: 0.0364; time 240: DM1+2: Asp: 0.0288. There were no significant differences at time 0.

Time 15 30 60 120 240
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
DM1
Gly 0.961 0.339 1.062 0.616 0.944 0.500 1.011 0.355 0.963 0.717
Ala 1.656 0.435 2.340 0.653 1.940 0.462 1.510 0.419 1.233 0.328
Ser 1.669 0.434 2.189 0.615 1.535 0.434 1.024 0.172 1.194 0.440
Pro 2.904 0.886 3.886 1.117 2.819 1.256 1.782 0.303 1.523 0.374
Val 1.977 0.510 2.509 0.698 2.255 0.422 1.712 0.257 1.583 0.310
Thr 2.594 0.544 3.885 0.867 2.855 0.813 2.013 0.229 1.832 0.829
Leu 1.365 0.152 1.425 0.155 0.995 0.094 0.582 0.162 0.828 0.143
Ile 5.815 1.849 7.033 1.190 5.198 0.841 3.426 0.464 2.603 0.517
Lys 2.195 0.794 2.258 0.500 1.828 0.690 1.468 0.653 1.263 0.734
Asn 1.666 0.251 2.003 0.399 1.412 0.313 1.012 0.091 1.218 0.414
Met 2.255 0.714 2.275 0.684 1.690 0.522 1.165 0.235 1.071 0.387
His 1.000 0.116 1.153 0.245 1.034 0.231 0.842 0.118 1.060 0.339
Phe 0.942 0.130 1.012 0.189 0.990 0.199 0.935 0.131 0.976 0.271
Tyr 0.816 0.143 0.863 0.245 0.765 0.170 0.599 0.134 0.647 0.136
Glu 1.302 0.307 1.243 0.149 1.061 0.180 0.915 0.127 0.961 0.173
Gln 1.278 0.204 1.309 0.296 1.291 0.277 1.245 0.208 1.242 0.402
Asp 1.783 0.495 2.225 0.760 1.592 0.327 1.076 0.245 1.104 0.316
Trp 0.980 0.105 1.116 0.188 0.906 0.155 0.725 0.145 0.808 0.256
Orn 1.288 0.340 1.520 0.501 1.287 0.366 0.989 0.175 1.006 0.325
Arg 1.041 0.135 1.220 0.272 1.024 0.198 0.876 0.193 0.963 0.242
Cit 0.889 0.251 1.075 0.316 0.809 0.228 0.744 0.244 0.939 0.467
DM2
Gly 1.238 0.926 1.197 0.745 1.081 0.938 1.227 0.796 0.979 0.654
Ala 1.603 0.354 1.664 0.483 1.620 0.447 1.312 0.335 1.163 0.379
Ser 1.653 0.297 1.697 0.546 1.457 0.204 1.102 0.213 1.083 0.169
Pro 3.177 0.867 3.052 1.017 2.846 1.185 2.291 1.110 1.617 0.435
Val 1.647 0.579 1.856 0.730 1.719 0.397 1.544 0.560 1.420 0.497
Thr 2.555 0.512 3.182 0.977 2.808 0.691 2.254 0.735 1.957 0.447
Leu 1.389 0.255 1.225 0.196 0.983 0.094 0.635 0.129 0.810 0.160
Ile 4.892 2.668 4.640 2.055 4.192 1.679 3.112 1.420 2.572 0.857
Lys 1.714 0.725 1.420 0.530 1.280 0.341 1.046 0.218 1.023 0.438
Asn 1.518 0.172 1.314 0.359 1.155 0.124 0.954 0.197 1.046 0.270
Met 1.992 0.542 1.830 0.641 1.570 0.328 1.220 0.173 1.085 0.184
His 1.114 0.208 1.045 0.308 0.993 0.175 0.823 0.178 0.944 0.171
Phe 1.055 0.227 0.952 0.195 0.956 0.109 0.964 0.159 1.036 0.130
Tyr 0.951 0.231 0.812 0.187 0.692 0.132 0.586 0.145 0.606 0.125
Glu 1.130 0.182 1.087 0.177 1.016 0.165 0.897 0.222 0.964 0.202
Gln 1.537 0.427 1.508 0.350 1.478 0.531 1.199 0.393 1.271 0.390
Asp 1.200 0.426 1.132 0.266 0.880 0.155 0.814 0.230 1.005 0.190
Trp 1.075 0.304 0.996 0.361 0.871 0.263 0.768 0.171 0.884 0.171
Orn 1.227 0.290 1.081 0.287 1.067 0.211 1.084 0.302 1.079 0.275
Arg 1.207 0.286 1.111 0.395 1.084 0.215 0.927 0.215 0.931 0.258
Cit 1.118 0.525 1.136 0.404 1.211 0.349 1.121 0.359 1.030 0.359

DM3
Gly 0.809 0.355 0.913 0.337 0.822 0.621 0.772 0.318 0.804 0.679
Ala 1.206 0.304 1.435 0.302 1.171 0.192 1.085 0.277 0.987 0.141
Ser 1.210 0.211 1.248 0.262 0.941 0.194 0.862 0.292 0.900 0.200
Pro 1.777 0.313 1.838 0.349 1.471 0.234 1.278 0.415 1.126 0.242
Val 1.459 0.274 1.715 0.330 1.228 0.117 1.314 0.572 1.078 0.143
Thr 1.625 0.368 1.851 0.471 1.635 0.217 1.438 0.463 1.325 0.293
Leu 2.282 0.435 2.328 0.442 1.658 0.366 1.091 0.617 0.887 0.141
Ile 3.524 1.089 3.675 0.890 2.498 0.721 1.736 1.234 1.380 0.386
Lys 1.632 0.560 1.662 0.712 1.389 0.599 0.943 0.117 0.874 0.189
Asn 1.630 0.329 1.534 0.429 1.353 0.335 1.034 0.430 0.980 0.202
Met 1.826 0.370 1.754 0.507 1.255 0.116 1.070 0.374 0.865 0.180
His 1.049 0.153 1.153 0.240 0.915 0.137 0.900 0.264 0.895 0.129
Phe 0.889 0.111 0.911 0.104 0.843 0.100 0.879 0.140 0.910 0.119
Tyr 1.645 0.244 1.985 0.713 1.723 0.437 1.667 0.295 1.305 0.248
Glu 0.950 0.144 0.951 0.152 0.801 0.189 0.756 0.221 0.774 0.111
Gln 1.170 0.104 1.061 0.223 1.036 0.120 0.911 0.148 0.920 0.093
Asp 0.953 0.291 1.111 0.138 0.998 0.158 0.755 0.221 0.724 0.170
Trp 1.244 0.272 1.455 0.302 1.165 0.382 1.071 0.444 0.950 0.383
Orn 1.259 0.247 1.374 0.230 1.147 0.222 1.064 0.335 0.977 0.195
Arg 1.216 0.226 1.236 0.331 0.982 0.138 0.869 0.213 0.835 0.163
Cit 0.815 0.158 0.802 0.173 0.649 0.163 0.642 0.141 0.842 0.211
DM4
Gly 1.179 0.781 1.304 0.630 0.920 0.445 1.230 0.433 1.183 0.690
Ala 1.546 0.395 1.552 0.278 1.463 0.406 1.304 0.157 1.003 0.378
Ser 1.521 0.336 1.419 0.228 1.196 0.382 0.978 0.120 0.961 0.347
Pro 2.499 1.154 2.357 0.774 2.003 0.704 1.509 0.287 1.135 0.429
Val 1.861 0.438 1.865 0.450 1.528 0.297 1.511 0.913 1.263 0.491
Thr 2.067 1.025 2.389 0.795 2.069 0.687 1.654 0.224 1.380 0.525
Leu 2.237 0.667 1.981 0.433 1.579 0.482 0.995 0.277 0.829 0.279
Ile 3.681 1.813 3.072 1.203 2.667 1.251 1.481 0.582 1.132 0.457
Lys 1.671 0.782 1.385 0.292 1.429 0.704 1.184 0.389 1.179 0.589
Asn 1.588 0.591 1.502 0.439 1.291 0.342 1.008 0.191 0.851 0.231
Met 2.527 1.706 2.337 1.887 1.956 2.094 1.503 1.681 1.035 0.763
His 1.237 0.231 1.261 0.135 1.140 0.270 1.004 0.153 0.981 0.342
Phe 1.054 0.126 0.981 0.109 0.947 0.141 0.942 0.108 0.921 0.293
Tyr 1.548 0.594 1.524 0.559 1.606 0.723 1.667 0.568 1.347 0.525
Glu 1.123 0.205 1.013 0.191 0.950 0.221 0.823 0.168 0.893 0.407
Gln 1.236 0.246 1.150 0.160 1.120 0.211 1.107 0.196 0.911 0.319
Asp 1.121 0.261 0.964 0.149 0.854 0.234 0.819 0.177 0.860 0.343
Trp 1.505 0.436 1.403 0.272 1.252 0.345 1.031 0.147 1.010 0.355
Orn 1.470 0.405 1.376 0.200 1.337 0.302 1.105 0.153 0.992 0.314
Arg 1.477 0.315 1.344 0.238 1.138 0.218 0.967 0.116 0.940 0.314
Cit 1.132 0.285 1.105 0.216 1.201 0.603 0.989 0.231 0.971 0.413

Since most of the AAs peaked after either 15 or 30 min, comparison of the concentrations for each DM after 15 min versus 30 min was performed to test for significant differences between these time points. The following AAs showed significant changes between time 15 and time 30: DM1: Ala (0.0474), Pro (0.0174), Val (0.0299), and Ile (0.0294), DM2: Leu (0.0295), and DM4: Asp (0.0423). There were no significant changes for any AA in DM3. More details are provided in Supplemental Table A.

The paired t-test was used for comparison of the concentrations found in DM1 and DM2 and in DM3 and DM4, respectively, at each time point, to test for significant differences between the four DMs. We found no significant differences at time 0. Plasma concentrations (µmol/l) after intake of the DM and test meal for all AAs presented as %. Comparison between DM1+2 and DM3+4 gave the following results: time 15: DM1+2: Tyr: 0.0228, Asp: 0.0136, and citrulline: 0.0378; DM3+4: Pro: 0.0455, Val: 0.0204, and Thr: 0.0239; time 30: DM1+2: Leu: 0.0178, Ile: 0.0021, Asn: 0.0038, and Asp: 0.0362; DM3+4: Ser: 0.0031, Pro: 0.0486, Thr: 0.0027, His: 0.0108, Tyr: 0.0412, and citrulline: 0.0409; time 60: DM1+2: Asp: 0.0060 and citrulline: 0.0100; DM3+4: Pro: 0.0003, Val: 0.0088, Thr: 0.0270, and Asp: 0.0155; time 120: DM3+4: citrulline:0.0364; and time 240: DM1+2: Asp: 0.0288. There were no significant differences at time 0.

Compared to baseline values, ghrelin values demonstrated a significant decrease at 30, 60, and 120 min for DM1, at 30 min for DM2, at 60 and 120 min for DM3, and at 30, 60, and 120 min for DM4, respectively. Final levels decreased 7% for DM1, increased 10% for DM2 and 5% for DM3, and remained unchanged in DM4, all compared to baseline. Table 7 displays results (% compared to baseline) and the t-test for all levels and values (mean and SD) in Supplemental Table B.

Table 7.

Ghrelin levels over time, presented as % relative to start value (time 0) + SD and p value.

DM1 DM2 DM3 DM4
Time Relative (%) SD (%) p value Relative (%) SD (%) p value Relative (%) SD (%) p value Relative (%) SD (%) p value
0 100 100 100 100
15 95 12 0.266 88 11 0.056 90 13 0.171 75 22 0.050
30 82 5 0.006 83 15 0.035 78 19 0.055 80 10 0.015
60 81 13 0.030 84 16 0.068 80 12 0.013 75 11 0.006
120 81 10 0.020 84 15 0.088 75 14 0.011 74 13 0.010
240 93 18 0.454 110 20 0.180 105 25 0.473 100 34 0.986

Significant.

None of the biomarkers GLP-1, PYY, BUN, CCK, insulin, and glucose showed significant changes from baseline (premeal) to the end of the study period (240 min after meal and DM). Results for biomarkers are presented in Figure 1 (% compared to baseline) and values (mean +/− SD) in Supplemental Table C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Results (mean +/− SD) for the following biomarkers: glucose, insulin, GLP-1, PYY, BUN, and CCK. None of them demonstrated significant changes from baseline (premeal) to the end of the study period (240 min after meal and DM).

3.6. VAS Score

The question “how satisfied are you?” obtained the following nonsignificant results: DM1 (mean 36, SD 18), DM2 (mean 41, SD 16), DM3 (mean 28, SD 27), and DM4 (mean 35, SD 30). The results for the other question “how does the DM taste?” were as follows: DM1 (mean 46, SD 31), DM2 (mean 44, SD 22), DM3 (mean 36, SD 28), and DM4 (mean 26, SD 22). All comparisons (DM1 and DM2, DM3 and DM4, but also DM3 compared to DM1 and DM2, resp.) were statistically insignificant.

4. Discussion

This study evaluated the metabolic short-term effect of CGMP compared to an almost identical combination of FSAA by repeated measurements. One of the most important findings was that the residual content of Phe in DM3 did not affect the plasma level significantly compared to DM4 at any time which support data from Ney et al. [11].

Over the last 8 years, CGMP has been investigated in mice studies and a few human studies to evaluate safety, acceptability, and efficacy of CGMP as a nutritional supplement for treatment of PKU [1113, 15, 30, 31]. The present study supports the conclusions of these studies.

The slower absorption of most of the AA in DM1 and DM3, which contained CGMP, compared to DM2 and DM4, which contained only FSAA, could be explained by the fact that CGMP delay the absorption in the gut. The fact that Tyr increased in DM3 and DM4, but only decreased without peak in DM1 and DM2, is assumed to be caused by the low content in DM1 and DM2. Tyr and Trp both peaked at 30 min for DM3 compared to 15 min for DM4, suggesting that the content of Tyr and Trp in the CGMP mixtures were metabolized less rapidly than the FSAA. The Phe/Tyr ratio decreased over time with 30% in both DM3 and DM4, while it increased (caused by the low-Tyr concentration in DM1 and DM2) with 50% for DM1 and 70% for DM2. The Phe/Tyr ratio is an important measure because a high ratio can have a long-term negative effect on executive functions [32].

The AUC for “total AA” was not associated with absorption rate. We also calculated the AUC for each AA and compared with peak values to determine complete absorption and absorption rate, and we did find significant differences for Lys, Asn, and Asp for DM1 and DM2 and for citrulline for DM3 and DM4. None of the LNAA (extra-added in DM3 and matched in DM4) was significantly different.

Ala, Pro, Val, and Ile demonstrated a significant increase from 15 to 30 min for DM1, while only Leu in DM2 and Asp in DM4 decreased significantly, which indicate a better absorption of pure CGMP. The fact that none of the AA in DM3 changed significantly could be the influence of the extra-added AA (LNAA and Lys). In contrast, we did see significant differences between several AAs by comparison between DM1 and DM2 and between DM3 and DM4 at each time point. Especially His, Tyr, and Trp are noteworthy for DM3 and DM4, since they are FSAAs added to the pure CGMP. Also, Thr, Ile, and Val are of certain interest, since the natural content of these three AAs in CGMP is high [33]. The high content of these AAs and addition of extra-LNAA to the CGMP offer an additional positive effect, since LNAA competes for transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via the L-type amino acid transporter (LAT1) [34, 35]. High Phe in plasma diminishes uptake of Tyr and Trp into the brain, and this results in reduced formation of neurotransmitters [36]. This imbalance is possibly the major cause of disturbed brain development in PKU patients [37]. Each LNAA has individual affinity relation to LAT1 [38]. Several studies have shown the positive blocking effect of LNAA which reduces Phe entering the brain [3941]. Matalon et al. [17] demonstrated a decrease in Phe in the blood up to 50% using LNAA tablets and emphasized that LNAA in a specific mixture inhibits Phe uptake already in the gut [16, 42]. Administrations of Val, Ile, and Leu have proved to reduce Phe concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of humans [43].

All biomarkers remained unchanged by comparing time 0 and 240 min, and there were no significant changes in plasma Phe despite the residual amount of Phe in CGMP in line with findings from Ney et al. [11, 13]. This study demonstrated that AA in CGMP is absorbed as efficient as an identical mixture of FSAA.

All the DMs demonstrated a decreasing effect on ghrelin after the meal. Ghrelin values showed significant decreases at 30, 60, and 120 min for DM1, at 30 min for DM2, at 60 and 120 min for DM3, and at 30, 60, and 120 min for DM4. Low-ghrelin concentrations are associated with a feeling of satiety [44, 45]. By only evaluating DM1 and DM2, it could indicate that satiety is reached faster for CGMP. However, VAS scores for satiety did not show any significant difference between DM1 and DM2, nor between DM3 and DM4.

BUN was nonsignificantly lower for DM1 and DM3 compared to DM2 and DM4, which potentially could suggest a more efficient utilization of GMP compared to AA, as found by van Calcar et al. [13]. Similar findings have been reported by Ney et al. [46]. However, our present short-term study was not able to support these findings.

GLP-1 promotes insulin secretion and reduces appetite and reached the highest (nonsignificant) level with DM3 after 240 min (118%) which may indicate that satiety was better obtained with DM3 compared with DM1, DM2, and DM4. This finding concurs with previous studies, showing that GMP promotes satiety [14]. PYY also reduces appetite and reached the highest value for DM3 (111%). CCK is a peptide hormone in the gastrointestinal system responsible for stimulating the digestion of fat and protein. The wide variation from a decrease of 18% in DM3 to an increase of 33% in DM4 was unexpected, since CCK is expected to rise after a mixed meal [23].

A limitation of this study was the small number of patients. However, it was important for the study design to select as homogeneous a test population as possible (only early-treated classical PKU confirmed by mutation analysis), resulting in exclusion of a number of patients.

Three patients had a BMI over 30 and were defined as obese, one slightly obese, three had a normal BMI, and one had a BMI below normal. The patients were receiving dosage after their actual weight, which means that the patients that were categorized with normal BMI received less DM per kg lean body mass.

Although this study demonstrated nonsignificant changes for almost all biochemical markers, it is important to notice that this study only replaced a single meal and a long-term effect could be different. Based on the current results, we consider CGMP to be a safe alternative to FSAA but should be supplemented with additional FSAA to make it nutritionally adequate and potential also with other nutrients as fat, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals to create an easy-to-use supplement for patients with PKU. If CGMP products substitute FSAA completely, it is necessary to carefully monitor if the small content of Phe will have an impact on the blood level in the long term. If Phe levels increase, restrictions of the LP diet must be implemented to balance and control the Phe intake and blood level. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term impact and efficacy of CGMP in the management of PKU.

5. Conclusion

Dietary management of PKU should be lifelong, and good compliance is crucial for a good outcome. CGMP did not change any of the biomarkers significantly compared to free-synthetic AA when consumed with a test meal in PKU patients. The residual amount of Phe in CGMP did not affect the plasma Phe level significantly. Based on these data, we consider CGMP to be a suitable alternative as supplement for PKU treatment. However, further research is needed to determine the long-term effects and safety of CGMP. This study demonstrates that CGMP has the same short-term effect as FSAA.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Arla Foods Ingredients and The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation for funding, the PKU patients for participating in the study, nurse Signe Larsen (PKU clinic, Kennedy Centre) for performing the blood sampling, and lab technicians Søren Andresen and Marianne Falck (University of Copenhagen) for performing the blood analyses and assisting in handling of blood samples.

Abbreviations

CGMP:

Casein glycomacropeptide, CGMP-20 (product name Lacprodan CGMP-20)

PKU:

Phenylketonuria

AA:

Amino acid(s)

FSAA:

Free-synthetic AA

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

GLP-1:

Glucagon-like peptide-1

CCK:

Cholecystokinin

PYY:

Peptide tyrosine-tyrosine

DM:

Drink mix

Ala:

Alanine

Arg:

Arginine

Asn:

Asparagine

Asp:

Aspartate

Cys:

Cysteine

Glu:

Glutamine

Gly:

Glycine

His:

Histidine

Ile:

Isoleucine

Leu:

Leucine

Lys:

Lysine

Met:

Methionine

Phe:

Phenylalanine

Pro:

Proline

Ser:

Serine

Thr:

Threonine

Trp:

Tryptophan

Tyr:

Tyrosine

Val:

Valine

PAH:

Phenylalanine hydroxylase

VAS:

Visual analogue score

LP:

Low protein

min:

Minutes

SD:

Standard deviation

kJ:

Kilojoule.

Disclosure

Kirsten Kiær Ahring is an industrial PhD student sponsored by AFI and The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

All authors have made a substantial contribution to the design and interpretation of data for the work, revised it critically, and been presented for the final version to be published. Erik Jensen, Kirsten K. Ahring, and Lisbeth B. Møller were involved in designing the study. Kirsten K. Ahring was involved in collecting all the data and writing the main manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Table A. Results for all AA at time 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 (Mean and SD). Table B. Ghrelin results for time 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 (Mean and SD). Table C. Results for glucose, insulin, GLP-1, PYY, BUN, and CCK (Mean ± SD). None of them demonstrated significant changes from baseline (pre-meal) to end of study period (240 min after meal and DM).

References

  • 1.Mitchell J. J., Trakadis Y. J., Scriver C. R. Phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Genetics in Medicine. 2011;13(8):697–707. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3182141b48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blau N. Genetics of phenylketonuria: then and now. Human Mutation. 2016;37(6):508–515. doi: 10.1002/humu.22980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giovannini M., Verduci E., Salvatici E., Paci S., Riva E. Phenylketonuria: nutritional advances and challenges. Nutrition and Metabolism. 2012;9(1):p. 7. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Levy H. L. Nutritional therapy for selected inborn errors of metabolism. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1989;8(1):54S–60S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1989.10737970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.MacDonald A., Rocha J. C., van Rijn M., Feillet F. Nutrition in phenylketonuria. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2011;104:S10–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Williams R. A., Mamotte C. D. S., Burnett J. R. Phenylketonuria: an inborn error of phenylalanine metabolism. Clinical Biochemist Reviews. 2008;29(1):31–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.MacDonald A., Gokmen-Ozel H., van Rijn M., Burgard P. The reality of dietary compliance in the management of phenylketonuria. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2010;33(6):665–670. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9073-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aguiar A., Ahring K., Almeida M. F., et al. Practices in prescribing protein substitutes for PKU in Europe: no uniformity of approach. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2015;115(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Spronsen F. J., Burgard P. The truth of treating patients with phenylketonuria after childhood: the need for a new guideline. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2008;31(6):673–679. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0918-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chabance B., Marteau P., Rambaud J. C., et al. Casein peptide release and passage to the blood in humans during digestion of milk or yogurt. Biochimie. 1998;80(2):155–165. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(98)80022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ney D. M., Gleason S. T., van Calcar S. C., et al. Nutritional management of PKU with glycomacropeptide from cheese whey. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2009;32(1):32–39. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0952-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Solverson P., Murali S. G., Brinkman A. S., et al. Glycomacropeptide, a low-phenylalanine protein isolated from cheese whey, supports growth and attenuates metabolic stress in the murine model of phenylketonuria. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2012;302(7):E885–E895. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00647.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van Calcar S. C., MacLeod E. L., Gleason S. T., et al. Improved nutritional management of phenylketonuria by using a diet containing glycomacropeptide compared with amino acids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;89(4):1068–1077. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Calcar S. C., Ney D. M. Food products made with glycomacropeptide, a low-phenylalanine whey protein, provide a new alternative to amino acid-based medical foods for nutrition management of phenylketonuria. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2012;112(8):1201–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laclair C. E., Ney D. M., MacLeod E. L., Etzel M. R. Purification and use of glycomacropeptide for nutritional management of phenylketonuria. Journal of Food Science. 2009;74(4):E199–E206. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01134.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matalon R., Michals-Matalon K., Bhatia G., et al. Double blind placebo control trial of large neutral amino acids in treatment of PKU: effect on blood phenylalanine. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2007;30(2):153–158. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0556-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matalon R., Michals-Matalon K., Bhatia G., et al. Large neutral amino acids in the treatment of phenylketonuria (PKU) Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2006;29(6):732–738. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0395-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guldberg P., Guttler F. Mutations in the phenylalanine hydroxylase gene: methods for their characterization. Acta Paediatrica. 1994;83(407):49–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Güttler F., Lou H. Phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia. In: Fernandes J., Saudubray J.-M., Tada K., editors. Inborn Metabolic Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1990. pp. 161–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guttler F. Hyperphenylalaninemia: diagnosis and classification of the various types of phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency in childhood. Acta paediatrica Scandinavica. Supplement. 1980;280:1–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thompson G. N., Halliday D. Significant phenylalanine hydroxylation in vivo in patients with classical phenylketonuria. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1990;86(1):317–322. doi: 10.1172/JCI114701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson G. N., Pacy P. J., Watts R. W., Halliday D. Protein metabolism in phenylketonuria and Lesch–Nyhan syndrome. Pediatric Research. 1990;28(3):240–246. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199009000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rehfeld J. F. Accurate measurement of cholecystokinin in plasma. Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44(5):991–1001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ABX H. 2008. Diagnostic test for glucose.
  • 25. Diagnostic Test for Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), 2014, http://www.horiba.com.
  • 26.Nauck M. A., Kleine N., Ørskov C., Holst J. J., Willms B., Creutzfeldt W. Normalization of fasting hyperglycaemia by exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36 amide) in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 1993;36(8):741–744. doi: 10.1007/bf00401145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Näslund E., Bogefors J., Skogar S., et al. GLP-1 slows solid gastric emptying and inhibits insulin, glucagon, and PYY release in humans. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 1999;277(3):R910–R916. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.3.R910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Andreasen S. Ghrelin Elisa Kit. 2015.
  • 29.Special Assays: Monitoring of Amino Acid on Request. 2016. http://www.zfs-reutlingen.de.
  • 30.Zaki O. K., El-Wakeel L., Ebeid Y., et al. The use of glycomacropeptide in dietary management of phenylketonuria. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2016;2016:p. 5. doi: 10.1155/2016/2453027.2453027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pinto A., Almeida M. F., Ramos P. C., et al. Nutritional status in patients with phenylketonuria using glycomacropeptide as their major protein source. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2017;71(10):1230–1234. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luciana M., Sullivan J., Nelson C. A. Associations between phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratios and performance on tests of neuropsychological function in adolescents treated early and continuously for phenylketonuria. Child Development. 2001;72(6):1637–1652. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Neelima, Sharma R., Rajput Y. S., Mann B. Chemical and functional properties of glycomacropeptide (GMP) and its role in the detection of cheese whey adulteration in milk: a review. Dairy Science and Technology. 2013;93(1):21–43. doi: 10.1007/s13594-012-0095-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pietz J., Rupp A., Ebinger F., et al. Cerebral energy metabolism in phenylketonuria: findings by quantitative in vivo 31P MR spectroscopy. Pediatric Research. 2003;53(4):654–662. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000055867.83310.9E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pietz J., Kreis R., Rupp A., et al. Large neutral amino acids block phenylalanine transport into brain tissue in patients with phenylketonuria. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1999;103(8):1169–1178. doi: 10.1172/JCI5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leuzzi V., Tosetti M., Montanaro D., et al. The pathogenesis of the white matter abnormalities in phenylketonuria. A multimodal 3.0 tesla MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) study. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2007;30(2):209–216. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0399-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van Spronsen F. J., de Groot M. J., Hoeksma M., Reijngoud D. J., van Rijn M. Large neutral amino acids in the treatment of PKU: from theory to practice. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2010;33(6):671–676. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9216-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Knudsen G. M., Hasselbalch S., Toft P. B., Christensen E., Paulson O. B., Lou H. Blood-brain barrier transport of amino acids in healthy controls and in patients with phenylketonuria. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 1995;18(6):653–664. doi: 10.1007/bf02436753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schindeler S., Ghosh-Jerath S., Thompson S., et al. The effects of large neutral amino acid supplements in PKU: an MRS and neuropsychological study. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2007;91(1):48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yano S., Moseley K., Azen C. Large neutral amino acid supplementation increases melatonin synthesis in phenylketonuria: a new biomarker. Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;162(5):999–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bik-Multanowski M., Pietrzyk J. J. LAT1 gene variants—potential factors influencing the clinical course of phenylketonuria. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2006;29(5):p. 684. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0285-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koch R. Large neutral amino acid therapy and phenylketonuria: a promising approach to treatment. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2003;79(2):110–113. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7192(03)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jordan M. K., Brunner R. L., Hunt M. M., Berry H. K. Preliminary support for the oral administration of valine, isoleucine and leucine for phenylketonuria. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1985;27(1):33–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1985.tb04522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.MacLeod E. L., Clayton M. K., van Calcar S. C., Ney D. M. Breakfast with glycomacropeptide compared with amino acids suppresses plasma ghrelin levels in individuals with phenylketonuria. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2010;100(4):303–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schulpis K. H., Papassotiriou I., Vounatsou M., Karikas G. A., Tsakiris S., Chrousos G. P. Morning preprandial plasma ghrelin and catecholamine concentrations in patients with phenylketonuria and normal controls: evidence for catecholamine-mediated ghrelin regulation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2004;89(8):3983–3987. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ney D. M., Stroup B. M., Clayton M. K., et al. Glycomacropeptide for nutritional management of phenylketonuria: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016;104(2):334–345. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.135293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Table A. Results for all AA at time 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 (Mean and SD). Table B. Ghrelin results for time 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 (Mean and SD). Table C. Results for glucose, insulin, GLP-1, PYY, BUN, and CCK (Mean ± SD). None of them demonstrated significant changes from baseline (pre-meal) to end of study period (240 min after meal and DM).


Articles from Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES