Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2018 Jan 22;115(6):E1100–E1107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716418115

Surface structure evolution in a homologous series of ionic liquids

Julia Haddad a,b, Diego Pontoni c, Bridget M Murphy d,e, Sven Festersen d, Benjamin Runge d, Olaf M Magnussen d,e, Hans-Georg Steinrück f, Harald Reichert g, Benjamin M Ocko h, Moshe Deutsch a,b,1
PMCID: PMC5819424  PMID: 29358372

Significance

This high-resolution X-ray study resolves the liquid–air interface structure for a long homologous series of room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs). RTILs are intensely studied for many potential “green” applications and for their intriguingly complex and rare combination of intermolecular interactions. Varying their cation’s alkyl chain length provides, therefore, an opportunity to tune the main interaction from mostly long-range electrostatic to mostly short-range van der Waals. This variation is found here to drive the interface structure from simple, to layered, to liquid crystalline. The quantitative results obtained constitute an accurate yardstick for testing simulations and theory, impact the bulk–surface structure relations in general, and provide currently scarce data for many RTIL applications, like batteries and supercapacitors.

Keywords: ionic liquids, X-ray reflectivity, surface layering, liquid-like, interdigitated chains

Abstract

Interfaces of room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are important for both applications and basic science and are therefore intensely studied. However, the evolution of their interface structure with the cation’s alkyl chain length n from Coulomb to van der Waals interaction domination has not yet been studied for even a single broad homologous RTIL series. We present here such a study of the liquid–air interface for n=2to22, using angstrom-resolution X-ray methods. For n<6, a typical “simple liquid” monotonic surface-normal electron density profile ρe(z) is obtained, like those of water and organic solvents. For n>6, increasingly more pronounced nanoscale self-segregation of the molecules’ charged moieties and apolar chains yields surface layering with alternating regions of headgroups and chains. The layering decays into the bulk over a few, to a few tens, of nanometers. The layering periods and decay lengths, their linear n dependence, and slopes are discussed within two models, one with partial-chain interdigitation and the other with liquid-like chains. No surface-parallel long-range order is found within the surface layer. For n=22, a different surface phase is observed above melting. Our results also impact general liquid-phase issues like supramolecular self-aggregation and bulk–surface structure relations.


Formally, room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are molten organic salts, which remain liquid to below 100 °C (1). This deceptively simple description covers an incredibly broad, complex, and intriguing novel class of liquids that has attracted an intense, and ever-growing, research activity since the 1990s (2, 3). RTILs consist of organic or inorganic anions and organic cations comprising charged headgroups attached to one or more alkyl moieties. This composition gives rise to a rich array of intermolecular and intramolecular interactions, seldom coexisting in a single material: Coulomb, dipolar, ππ, solvophobic, van der Waals (vdW), and hydrogen bonding (2, 3). These interactions were shown in simulations, (4, 5) and recently experimentally (2, 3, 6), to lead to the self-assembly of local nanostructure within the bulk, previously considered to be a homogeneous, locally isotropic, and unstructured simple liquid. While segregating the charged from the apolar moieties, the nanostructuring nevertheless leaves the corresponding bulk correlations liquid-like (LL) and short-ranged (2, 3, 69). RTILs are, therefore, an intriguing borderline case between molecularly ordered long-range-correlated solids and nanoscale-uniform, isotropic, short-range-ordered, simple liquids. Their study impacts therefore not only RTILs but liquids in general. RTILs’ bulk has been extensively studied by wide-angle X-ray scattering and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) (2, 3, 7, 8), which probe directly the bulk’s molecular-scale structure, by other related measurements (79), and by simulations (1012). All support strongly the existence of segregated domains of charged headgroups and apolar alkyl chains, organized, on a mesoscopic scale, as bilayers, clusters, hydrogen-bound networks, micelles, bicontinuous phases, etc. (2, 11, 1315). Boundary-induced transitions among these, and spontaneous dynamical structural rearrangements, were also suggested (16). The flat topology of the liquid–air interface should render the segregation surface-normal and planar, yielding a stack of alternating headgroup and alkyl-chain regions, as indeed found at RTIL–air (17) and RTIL–solid (18) interfaces.

Being experimentally challenging, the structure of RTIL interfaces, and, in particular, the structure’s evolution when varying the balance among the various molecular interactions, has been much less studied than their bulk counterparts. While a detailed review is outside the scope of this manuscript (see refs. 2 and 3 for recent excellent overviews), most published RTIL–air interface studies address Coulomb-dominated RTILs with relatively short alkyl moieties. High-resolution X-ray studies of RTIL interfaces are particularly scarce. The structure of the RTIL–air interface, the subject of the present study, has been previously measured by angstrom-resolution X-ray methods only for a few short-chain (n4) RTILs (1923), one pair of n=6,8 RTILs (24), and a single RTIL with n=18 (17). For n4, only weak layering of one to two layers was found, or none at all. The RTILs with n=6,8 show the start of a more pronounced layering, and the single long (n=18) RTIL measured exhibits a distinct surface layering penetrating tens of nanometers into the liquid. Importantly, among all of the RTILs studied previously, not more than two belong to the same homologous series, and even those are of close lengths: n=2,3 (23) and n=6,8 (24). The full body of RTIL–air surfaces studied to date by X-ray methods does reveal a variation in the level and characteristics of the near-surface structure. Nevertheless, since only two different-length RTILs were studied within any single homologous series, one cannot confidently elucidate which changes within this body are due to chain length variation, and which are due to different sizes, conformations, and interactions of the many different ionic species used. Thus, the evolution of the RTIL–air interface structure as the main interactions change gradually from mixed Coulomb–vdW to vdW dominance by varying the chain length, and that only, has not been hitherto determined by high-resolution X-ray methods for even a single long homologous RTIL series. Related issues were, however, addressed by simulations (1012), and macroscopic (9, 25, 26) and compositional (2731) methods. Thus, a quantitative determination of the structure’s characteristics (layering periodicity and decay length) for a broad n range in a single RTIL series, as done here, should also provide an important yardstick for testing theoretical and simulation studies. Finally, the interface structure of RTILs is of great importance not only to basic science but also to the many applications involving interfaces: supercapacitors, solar cells, batteries, metal extraction from wastes, chemical reactions and catalysis, and more (28, 3234). Elucidation of the RTIL–air interface’s influence and its variation with n should provide insights also for other interfaces, including the RTIL–solid one, involved in the above applications.

Here, we present a systematic angstrom-resolution synchrotron X-ray reflectivity (XR) study of the liquid–air interface structure of a homologous RTIL series, [Cnmim]+[NTf2], with alkyl lengths n=2to22. A series of surface phases are found: For small n, a monotonic surface-normal electron density profile (EDP) is observed, akin to that of simple liquids like water and organic solvents. As n increases, first a single high-density surface-segregated monolayer appears. For still-larger n, a nonmonotonic layered EDP develops, decaying into the bulk over a length scale which increases with n. For n=22, we observe a new surface phase above melting. The periodicities and decay lengths of the layering are determined, and their evolution with n is characterized and discussed. The interfacial molecular ordering reflected in the EDP and its relation to the bulk’s nanoscale local structure are also discussed, along with the broader impact of these results on liquids in general.

Results

The measured, Fresnel-normalized XR curves, R/RF, are plotted in Fig. 1A (symbols) versus the surface-normal scattering vector qz=(4π/λ)sin(α), where α is the grazing angle of incidence of the X-rays on the surface, and RF is the XR of an ideally abrupt and smooth surface (35).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) Fresnel-normalized measured (symbols) and model-fitted (lines) XR curves of the liquid–air interface of the RTILs studied at temperatures given in parentheses (in degrees Celsius). Note the higher temperatures for n14 which melt above RT (see Supporting Information for melting temperatures). Curves are shifted for clarity from each other by a decade for n14, and by multiplication by 4×102 (n=16), 3×103 (n=18), 3×104 (n=20), and 3×107and 5×109 (n=22). The different colors indicate different surface phases. Curves in two colors denote transitions between surface phases. Note the lower-temperature surface phase of n=22, tentatively identified as a liquid-crystal surface phase. (B) The EDPs (normalized to the bulk electron density) obtained from the model fits in A. The brown Gaussian represents the density enrichment at the air side of the surface. EDPs are shifted from each other for clarity, with black horizontal lines denoting ρ/ρb=0 for each. See Results for discussion.

Eye inspection reveals, for n=2to4, smoothly decreasing, unmodulated, R/RF curves typical of simple liquids, indicative of a ρe(z) which varies monotonically from zero to the bulk’s electron density ρb over a width dominated by thermally excited capillary waves (3537). Changes in R/RF start appearing for our RTILs at n=6to8 with a steeper fall-off at high qz, similar to the XR curves of the short-chain studies discussed in the Introduction (1923): the n=6,8 trialkyl-ammonium-based RTILs (24), and the n=4 RTILs with BF4, PF6, and halide anions, all of which are significantly less bulky than the NTf2 used here. We note, in passing, that varying the cations, the dominant and largest of the two ion constituents of an RTIL molecule, would likely induce larger variations in the surface structure, including the threshold for layering. However, since systematic studies of the influence of cation symmetry and architecture on nanostructuring are still scarce even for the RTILs’ bulk (3, 8), and since the variety of available cations is significantly broader than that of the anions (2), elucidating general trends in the cation dependence of layering is not possible at this time.

At n=10to12, our RTILs exhibit a plateau at small qz, which becomes, by n=14, a fully developed modulation with a well-defined dip, apparent in all higher-n curves. A new surface phase, manifested by two peaks, is observed for n=22 above bulk melting. However, as the lowest curve in Fig. 1A shows, the typical R/RF shape of n=16to20 is recovered also for n=22 at high temperatures. The new phase of n=22 is tentatively identified as the surface equivalent of the bulk liquid-crystal phase reported recently for this compound (38, 39). Indeed, the qz positions of the two peaks of n=22 in Fig. 1A are close to those of the (001) and (002) powder reflexes of n=22’s bulk crystalline phase (38). Our peaks do not originate, however, from a 3D powder lying on the liquid surface, since they are confined to the qz axis rather than being cuts through powder rings, and their broad widths imply a short crystalline coherence length. Moreover, the bulk liquid-crystal phase (38) appears only upon cooling below the RTIL’s melting temperature, Tm. The present surface phase seems to exist over a significant temperature range (≲25°C) above Tm. The structure and evolution with temperature and n of this surface phase deserve a detailed study.

Our grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GID) measurements for all n for surface-parallel scattering vectors 0.4 Å−1q1.9 Å−1 found no sharp peaks that would indicate long-range surface-parallel order akin to that detected in a different RTIL, [C4mim][PF6], near its Tm (40). However, since we focused on the structure’s n dependence, we have not measured detailed temperature-dependent grazing incidence SAXS (GISAXS) near Tm, where such surface-parallel order was reported to occur.

For quantitatively analyzing the measured XR curves, we used the distorted crystal model (DCM), developed for liquid mercury interfaces (41) and successfully used for liquid metals and alloys (35), and ionic liquids (17, 18, 24, 42). This model describes ρe(z) by a series of equally spaced (d) Gaussians of increasing widths, yielding ρe(z) modulations of amplitudes decreasing with z and eventually merging smoothly with the constant average density of the bulk, ρb. The rate of amplitude decay is controlled by the width parameter σ¯. To account for a possible density enhancement of the air side of the surface over the DCM contribution (17, 19), we also included a Gaussian of amplitude ρa. The model has the advantage of tuning ρe(z) from a simple-liquid-like monotonic EDP for dσ¯ to that of a decaying-layered one for d>σ¯. This property is particularly valuable here as it allows us to use the same consistent model to describe the structure despite the significant shape variations with n of R/RF and ρe(z), as discussed above. For further details of the model and the fits, see Supporting Information.

The fits, Fig. 1A (lines), reproduce well the measured R/RF curves (symbols) for all n and over the full measured qz range. The corresponding EDPs in Fig. 1B show the evolution from a monotonic ρe(z) for n=2to4, through a single higher-density surface-adsorbed layer for n=6, to a layered structure for n8. This accounts for the transition found in the range n=6±2 in the surface composition and in several macroscopic surface properties (27, 43). For example, Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (31) reveals a surface chain orientation change at n4, the surface tension γ(n) shows a slope change from negative for n<6 to near zero at n8 (44, 45), and the surface enthalpy (25) exhibits a minimum at n=6. As discussed below, bulk SAXS reveals the emergence of a prepeak at n6, indicative of the start of bulk nanostructuring at this n (13). The ρe(z) modulation period d is observed in Fig. 1B to increase with n. The additional Gaussian’s height also increases with n, although more moderately. A careful inspection of Fig. 1B also suggests that the EDP modulations’ decay length, ξ, increases with increasing n faster than does d. These eye estimates are confirmed by the fit-derived parameter values plotted in Figs. 2 and 3 and discussed in the following paragraphs.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Variation with alkyl chain length, n, of (A) fit-derived (symbols) surface layering periodicity, d, compared with bulk values by Rocha et al. (8) and Martinelli et al. (7), (B) d (less 5-Å headgroup size) normalized by the cation’s extended chain length ln, and (C) surface density enrichment of the air side of the surface normalized to the bulk density, ρa/ρb. The dashed lines in B and C are linear fits, intended to highlight a general decreasing (B) or increasing (C) trend. The dash–dot lines in A are the calculated extended alkane lengths, ln, and 2ln, with 5-Å headgroup size added. For discussion, see Results and Discussion.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) The XR-derived EDP of n=12 (symbols), and fit (line) by a decaying cosine. (B) The EDP-fit-derived decay lengths, without (ξ, black) and with (ξ/d, red) normalization to the layering period d, for varying chain length n. Linear fits (dashed lines) are also shown.

The layer spacing d in Fig. 2A increases linearly with n from 20 Å (n=8) to 35 Å (n=22). All values obtained for d are larger than the calculated extended lengths of the cations’ alkyl tails (46, 47), ln=1.27×(n1)+1.5 Å, even with the 5-Å headgroup size (38, 48) subtracted (Fig. 2B). Also, they are all significantly smaller than 2ln+5 Å. Thus, the d values are too large to correspond to molecular monolayers even if comprising surface-normal-aligned, extended alkyl chains, and too small to correspond to bilayers with fully extended chains. They are, however, consistent with the two models used in the literature to account for the structure of the segregated alkyl chains’ domains in the bulk: a bilayer consisting of flexible, partly interdigitated, and/or tilted chains (68) and a layer comprising LL chains (4951). We further discuss these points and the two models in Discussion.

The density enrichment of the surface’s air side, normalized to the bulk density, ρa/ρb (Eq. S2), is plotted in Fig. 2C. For n6, the R/RF fits did not require the additional Gaussian, indicating enrichment below our resolution. The excess density may be due to molecules crowding into the topmost molecular layer, or an enhanced number of chains on the air side, a possibility suggested by the n-increasing trend. This could occur if the balance of an equal number of down- and up-pointing chains in a subsurface cation layer is offset for the topmost cation layer by the presence of the surface, causing more chains to point up into the air than down into the first alkyl slab. A qualitative support, in trend and magnitude, for this interpretation is provided by reactive ion scattering measurements (29).

To quantify trends in ρe(z) of Fig. 1B, they were fitted by an exponentially decaying oscillatory function, ρe(z)=ρb+Aexp(z/ξ)cos[(2π/d^)(z+z0)], yielding excellent agreement; see the example in Fig. 3A. The decay length ξ, and the layer-spacing-normalized ξ/d, are plotted in Fig. 3B. The increase in ξ/d from 0.7 at n=8 to 1.3 at n=22 reflects an increase in the number of layers and a concomitant reduction of the surface entropy, demonstrating the n-increasing dominance of the chain-segregating vdW interaction. This conclusion agrees with the conclusion of bulk RTIL vaporization enthalpy studies (43, 52, 53), where the increase in the enthalpy with n is fully due to the increase in the vdW contribution. The Coulomb contribution remains constant, or even decreases slightly, rendering the vdW contribution at large n twice or more larger than the Coulomb one (5254). Simulation-based cohesive energy calculations (55) also support these results. The lower ξ/d=0.8, and hence the reduced surface order, found for the liquid–air interfacial layering of [C18mim][FAP] (17), compared with our [C18mim][NTf2]’s ξ/d1.1, can be assigned to the bulkier [FAP] anion. Indeed, molecular dynamics simulations (56) found the [FAP] anion to disrupt interfacial order significantly more than smaller, quasi-linear anions like our [NTf2].

For further insight, the bulk and surface X-ray scattering are compared in Fig. 4. The signature of the RTILs’ supramolecular bulk nanostructure in transmission-mode SAXS is peaks I and II, appearing at scattering vectors q smaller than that of the main liquid peak III. Only peak III is observed in a SAXS pattern of a nanoscale-uniform simple liquid (13). Peak I is assigned to the nanoscale segregation of the alkyl chains, thus separating the headgroups longitudinally by the n-increasing lengths shown as and in Fig. 2A. As discussed above, these lengths agree well with the surface-layering periods d (). The other peaks arise from headgroup–headgroup (II) and intramolecular and chain–chain (III) correlations. Both include contributions from additional correlations (57), with those to II being more minor and those to III being more substantial (13).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The bulk X-ray scattering patterns for n=20 in the transmission (SAXS) (black) and grazing incidence (GISAXS) (red) modes are in excellent agreement with each other and with the pattern measured for the surface layers (blue). The agreement supports the same structural motif at the bulk and the surface. The two lowest-q peaks, I and II, are the signatures of nanostructure due to alkyl chain segregation. Peak III is the usual liquid ring peak, the only one observed in this q range for simple, nanoscale-uniform liquids. For a discussion, see Results.

Fig. 4 also shows reflection-mode GISAXS measurements (see Supporting Information) of the same RTIL, with the beam impinging on the interface at an angle α above (red) or below (blue) the critical angle for total external reflection, αc=0.057 (35). For α>αc, the X-rays penetrate to a macroscopic depth z below the surface, thus sampling the bulk. The resultant GISAXS pattern (red symbols) is identical to the transmission-mode SAXS pattern (black symbols), as the figure demonstrates. For α<αc, the X-rays penetrate to 70 Å only (35) (see Supporting Information), and thus sample predominantly the layered surface region. The close match of the GISAXS pattern for this case (blue symbols) with those of the bulk in both scattering geometries (black and red symbols) clearly demonstrates that the lateral structure of the surface layers matches closely that of the nanostructured bulk. Further, the bulk’s low-q SAXS peak I discernibly appears first for n5to6 (8, 57), in good agreement with the emergence of surface layering at n=6±2, observed here. This n seems therefore to be the minimum required for a vdW interaction strong enough to drive the segregation of the polar and apolar moieties into separate domains.

Discussion

Chain Packing in the Apolar Layer.

The XR results (see Results) resolve the surface-normal structure of our RTILs as alternating layers of polar headgroups and apolar alkyl chains. GISAXS measurements can, in principle, determine surface-parallel structure (35). In practice, however, the broad, overlapping, GISAXS peaks in Fig. 4 cannot support the type of atomic resolution structure determination provided by crystallographic methods for crystalline RTILs (38, 5862). Still, the excellent correspondence between the surface GISAXS and the bulk SAXS patterns in Fig. 4 suggests that the lateral surface structure and, specifically, the chain packing in the alkyl layer are very similar to those of the nanosegregated bulk domains. The two literature models (68, 4951) for this packing are shown as cartoons in Fig. 5: Fig. 5A, comprising flexible, kinked, partly overlapping interdigitated chains (IC), and Fig. 5B where the alkyl layer is LL and has a uniform density close to that of bulk liquid alkanes. We now discuss these in more detail.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A and B) Cartoons of the alkyl slab structure for (A) the IC model, comprising flexible ICs, and (B) the LL model, comprising a LL alkyl layer. Brown and blue circles, yellow flexible rods, and yellow areas represent, respectively, cation headgroups, anions, alkyl chains, and LL alkyl domains. (CE) The density-based analysis. (C) The RTILs’ molecular volumes Vm (symbols) as calculated from the RTILs’ mass densities ρm, and their linear fit (line). Note the excellent agreement for all n. (D) Calculated molecular areas Am. (E) Calculated headgroup heights dh. For discussion, see text.

The IC model, proposed originally for alcohols (63, 64) and adopted in numerous RTIL studies (68, 17, 49, 60, 65), proceeds from the RTILs’ crystalline bulk structure of alternating polar and alkyl planar layers, with the latter comprising fully extended, rigid, close-packed interdigitated chains (ICs) (3, 38, 58, 60, 62). The resultant long-range positional order yields a rich diffraction pattern allowing a full atomic resolution crystallographic refinement (38, 62). Melting reduces this long-range order to a short-range one, broadening the diffraction peaks and rendering them highly overlapping (6, 7). However, the longitudinal packing of alternating polar and alkyl layers is preserved, as shown by the persistence of the corresponding (001) crystal peak, albeit broadened, as peak I in Fig. 4. The close q positions of these crystalline and liquid peaks (6, 62, 66, 67) suggest that no major reordering of the molecules occurs. This conclusion is supported by studies showing that, in alkanes (46, 68), the persistence length of the chain’s trans segments is still five methylenes long many tens of degrees above melting (46, 68). Thus, while melting clearly destroys the fully extended, rigid, all-trans conformation of the chains by introducing gauche defects, the interdigitation motif may largely survive in the RTILs’ liquid phase as well, similar to that found in molten alcohols (63, 64). The facts that the layer spacing d for all n8 is intermediate between ln+5 Å and 2ln+5 Å, that, in the bulk, it increases with n by more than the projected C–C bond length, 1.27 Å/CH2, but by less than 2×1.27 Å/CH2 (6, 7), and that it decreases with increasing temperature despite the overall volume expansion (17, 39) are taken, in this approach, as support for chain interdigitation.

The LL model originated in biological membranes (69), and has been used for RTILs (4951) and organic photovoltaic thin films (70). It uses the measured (71) mass densities, ρm, available for [Cnmim][NTf2] of 2n14, the molecular weights, MW, and Avogadro’s number, NA, to calculate the molecular volumes Vm=MW/(ρmNA). As shown in Fig. 5C, Vm exhibits a perfect linear n dependence over the full n range, the slope of which is the volume per CH2 moiety, VCH2RTIL. Liquid alkanes (46) also exhibit a linear n dependence for the alkanes’ molecular volumes, yielding VCH2Alkane as the slope, and VCH3Alkane as half the intercept when plotted against (n2). VCH2RTIL and VCH3Alkane allow calculating the RTILs’ headgroup volume VheadRTIL=Vm[(n1)×VCH2RTIL+VCH3Alkane]. This simple analysis (4951) yields two important results. First, the obtained VCH2RTIL=28.09±0.05 Å3 is about 4% higher than VCH2Alkane=27.01±0.05 Å3. This near-coincidence supports the conclusion that the bulk alkyl domains, and the surface alkyl layers, consist of a uniform liquid similar to molten alkanes. Second, n-independence of the obtained VheadRTIL=344.3±0.6 Å3, as expected, further supports the LL model. Also, the surface-bulk similarity discussed above yields the area per molecule at the surface, Am=2×Vm/d, for n=8to14 where experimental values are available for both bulk Vm and surface d. The average of the Am values (Fig. 5D), Am=59.3±1.6 Å2, is threefold larger than the 20 Å2 of closely packed fully extended alkyl chains (72). This accounts, within the LL model, for the observed dd/dn=1.14 Å/CH2, a value even lower than the 1.27 Å/CH2 slope of the ln line in Fig. 2A. The common Am of the headgroup and chain yields also the headgroup’s height dh=(d/2)×(VheadRTIL/Vm) (Fig. 5E). The average dh=5.75±0.16 Å agrees with, although it is slightly larger than, the 5 Å literature value (38, 48), further supporting the LL model.

Our results are consistent with both models, albeit with caveats. The IC model lacks an unambiguous signature in the X-ray and neutron scattering studies uniquely assignable to chain interdigitation. The LL model infers a particular, nanoscale-uniform, alkyl slab structure from macroscopic mass densities, while many different nanoscale-modulated structures may average to the same macroscopic ρm. We note, however, that the models are not necessarily contradictory, as long as the average density of the interdigitated model remains close to that of the alkanes’ bulk density. Further study is clearly required.

Evolution Trends.

As Fig. 2A shows, the d values start between the 2ln+5 Å and the ln+5 Å lines at n=8 but increasingly approach the ln+5 Å line with increasing n. Within the IC model with fully extended, layer-normal chains, a 2ln+5 Å layer spacing implies a bilayer structure with zero chain overlap, while an ln+5 Å spacing implies a monolayer with full chain overlap. The overlap, in this case, is pn=2ln(d5). Taking the derivative of this expression and using the observed dd/dn=1.14 Å/CH2 and the canonical dln/dn=1.27 Å/CH2 yields an overlap which increases by dpn/dn=1.4 Å/CH2, slightly more than a single methyl, upon a unity increase of n. In practice, however, the chains in the IC model are not extended, but kinked, and have (unknown) effective lengths l^n<ln. Necessarily, therefore, dpn/dn<1.4 Å/CH2, although a quantitative estimate must await the availability of l^n values. We note, however, that the increase of the overlap with n is energetically favorable, since it increases adjacent chains contacts and thus their vdW interaction.

Another important trend is reflected in the linear ξ fit in Fig. 3B. The fit yields a slope dξ/dn=2.35±0.19 Å/CH2. This value agrees within error with 2 × 1.27 Å/CH2, the combined lengths of the two methylenes added to the alkyl layer upon increasing n by unity. The dξ/dn parallels therefore the expected increase in the vdW interaction due to the added methylenes, implying that the layering range is determined by that interaction, with negligible contribution from interactions between the polar headgroups’ layers. This, in turn, suggests that the anomalously negative thermal expansion coefficients found for the surface d of [C18mim][FAP] (17), and for the bulk dI of n=18 and n=22 (39), originate in the alkyl layer, not in the interaction between the polar headgroups’ layers. Finally, we also note that, since d increases with n with a much smaller slope than ξ, ξ/d still increases, reaching values of 1 for n18.

Bulk–Surface Order Relations.

The RTIL–air surface structure resolved here impacts also the important question of the correspondence between bulk and surface structure in liquids in general. For the small, symmetric, and monoatomic molecules of liquid metals, the layered surface structure found was demonstrated to be dominated by bulk correlations, exhibiting identical spacings and order decay lengths (35, 41). Simulations predict that this may be an intrinsic general property of all simple liquids below 10to20% of their critical temperature, provided that they remain liquid (73, 74). Indeed, medium-size, roughly spherical organic molecules were found to exhibit surface layering with characteristics following their bulk correlations (75, 76). In contrast, for larger, asymmetric, molecules, surface-induced effects may dominate over the intrinsic bulk correlations and yield a surface ordering significantly different from the bulk’s. Examples are liquid crystals, exhibiting smectic surface phases on isotropic or nematic bulk (77, 78), and surface freezing of alkanes, and related molecules, where a crystalline monolayer or bilayer forms at the liquid melt’s surface (47). In particular, the elongated shape and combination of mainly polar and vdW interactions of liquid crystals are very similar to those of the RTILs, although they lack the RTILs’ ionic composition. Despite this similarity, which should yield in RTILs a surface phase different from the bulk, as occurs in liquid crystals, our n20 RTILs exhibit a surface phase that practically coincides with that of the bulk (2, 3, 68). Intriguingly, however, for n=22, we find a transition to the behavior observed for long, asymmetric, molecules, namely, a distinct surface phase different from the bulk. This transition is clearly driven by the increasing dominance of the vdW interaction upon chain length increase. Both the new surface phase of n=22, tentatively identified as a liquid crystal, and the transition in the relation of the bulk and surface structures clearly call for further study.

Summary and Conclusions

We present here a first systematic study of the evolution of the liquid–air interface structure with increasing cation chain length for a broad homologous series of RTILs, [Cnmim]+[NTf2], n=4to22. The angstrom-resolution X-ray measurements reveal, in detail, the progress of the EDP from a simple-liquid-like one for n<6, through a layered one for 8<n<20, to a liquid-crystal surface phase for n=22 which reverts to a “conventional” layered surface phase at high temperatures. The layered phase consists of alternating charged and apolar surface-parallel slabs, the former comprising cation headgroups and anions, and the latter comprising alkyl chains. The layer spacing d was found to be larger than the extended length of the cation’s alkyl chain but smaller than twice that length. This implies a bilayer-like packing of molecules within the layer. The d exhibits a good quantitative agreement with the correlation distance of the bulk’s nanoscale structure, obtained from the bulk SAXS prepeak I positions (7). The surface layer spacing d increases linearly with n, with a slope of 1.14 Å/CH2, which is smaller than the 1.27 Å/CH2 projected length of a C–C bond.

The lateral chain packing within the alkyl slab is discussed here within two models. The first, based on a close correspondence of the surface structure with the SAXS-determined nanostructure of the bulk (68, 17, 49, 60, 65), suggests the alkyl slab to consist of flexible, kinked, partially overlapping, interdigitated chains. The second, using macroscopic mass densities (49, 70), shows that the mass densities of the alkyl slab and bulk liquid alkane are within 4% of each other, and thus suggests the alkyl slab to be liquid-like. Our results are consistent with both, indicating need for further studies.

We also discuss the trends in the derived quantities, showing, within the IC model, an increase in the chain overlap with increasing n, as well as a full domination of the layering decay length by the vdW interaction within the apolar layers. Also discussed are the broader implications of our results for the bulk–surface structure relations in our RTILs and in liquids in general.

Future X-ray measurements of the temperature evolution (24) of the surface structure of the present homologous RTIL series may shed more light on the issues discussed here, in particular the chain packing in the apolar domains. As found for [C18mim][FAP] (17), we expect that d for [Cnmim][NTf2] contracts with increasing temperature at a similar n. However, the temperature slope should be stronger, and ξ/d versus T should decrease more slowly, since here the vdW interaction seems more dominant than for [C18mim][FAP]. This anomalous contraction should be, however, of a limited n range. For large n, the limit in the IC model will be set by the achievement of a full IC overlap, above which normal thermal expansion should be recovered. For small n, the increasing dominance of the headgroups’ electrostatic interaction should also dominate the expansion. We speculate therefore that the slopes of d versus T should be found to be maximally negative for some nc of order 18 to 20, and become increasingly less negative, and eventually positive, as n deviates up, or down, from this nc. Whether or not these speculations will be validated by experiment, the thermal behavior should provide important clues for the structure and underlying interactions of the surface layering.

The application of the present X-ray methods to the surfaces of binary mixtures of different-n members of our homologous RTIL series should also be illuminating, particularly in comparison with the growing body of bulk (79, 80) and surface (81) studies on RTIL mixtures. Tuning the chain length difference in mixtures could drive the system from homogeneity to phase separation, induce different bulk and surface phases, and nucleate surface phases having no bulk counterparts, as found in other systems (82, 83). Finally, quantitative theoretical studies elucidating, for example, the roles of the various interactions and molecular conformations in the surface structure and its n evolution, and other related issues, are also much desired.

Materials and Methods

Samples and Cell.

The homologous RTIL series 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Cnmim]+[NTf2]) was synthesized by Iolitec, with purities of >98% (>95% for n=20 and n=22), and water contents of <70 ppm. All liquid samples (n<14) were dried in a vacuum oven at 70 °C to 80 °C for periods of 8 h to 24 h before use.

Samples were contained in a shallow machined PCTFE tray 45 mm long and 1 mm deep, placed in a hermetically sealed, temperature-controlled (to ≤0.05°C) cell allowing measurements at temperatures of 0 °C to 150 °C. Possible beam damage was monitored by comparing repeated scans at the same position with that at a fresh spot. To minimize possible water vapor adsorption at the sample’s surface, particularly for the small-n, less-hydrophobic RTILs, hermetic cell sealing was used. Repeated measurements over a long time scale did not show changes attributable to adsorbed water layer buildup at the surface. No evidence for water adsorption was found upon comparing measurements done under sealed air-filled cell and under dry helium flow. The measurements presented here were done at RT, or, for higher-melting RTILs (n14), on melts above RT (see Supporting Information for melting temperatures). The measurement temperatures are listed in Fig. 1A.

X-Ray Measurements.

The surface-normal and surface-parallel structures were measured by XR and GISAXS, respectively. The liquid–surface diffractometers (8486) high-energy microdiffraction (HEMD) at ID15A and ID10 [European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF)], liquid interfaces scattering apparatus (LISA) [P08, PETRA III; Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)], and 9ID [advanced photon source (APS)] were used, with X-ray wavelengths λ=0.1771, 0.5586, 0.4958, and 0.9202 Å, respectively. The surface-normal EDP ρe(z) is extracted from the measured XR curves by fits of a mathematical model to the measured data (35, 87). Transmission-mode SAXS from the bulk was carried out at ID15B (ESRF) for n=20; see Supporting Information for details.

Note Added in Proof.

A study of the liquid crystalline surface phase of [C22mim][NTf2] has now been published by Mars et al. (88).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.201716418SI.pdf (291.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Martinelli and A. Triolo for sharing numerical data; V. Honkimaki, T. Buslaps, M. Di Michiel, A. Checco, and O. Konovalov for discussions and assistance; ESRF, APS, and PETRA III for beamtime and ESRF’s Partnership for Soft Condensed Matter (PSCM); US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Contract DE-SC0012704 (to B.M.O.); Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) Grants 05k13fk2 and 05k16fk1 (to O.M.M, B.M.M, S.F, and B.R.); and the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation, Jerusalem (M.D.) for support.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1716418115/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Wasserscheid P, Welton T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hayes R, Warr GG, Atkin R. Structure and nanostructure in ionic liquids. Chem Rev. 2015;115:6357–6426. doi: 10.1021/cr500411q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dong K, Liu X, Dong H, Zhang X, Zhang S. Multiscale studies on ionic liquids. Chem Rev. 2017;117:6636–6695. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Urahata SM, Ribeiro MCC. Structure of ionic liquids of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium cations: A systematic computer simulation study. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:1855–1863. doi: 10.1063/1.1635356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Y, Voth GA. Unique spatial heterogeneity in ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:12192–12193. doi: 10.1021/ja053796g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Russina O, Triolo A, Gontrani L, Caminiti R. Mesoscopic structural heterogeneities in room-temperature ionic liquids. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:27–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martinelli A, Marechal M, Ostlund A, Cambedouzou J. Insights into the interplay between molecular structure and diffusional motion in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ionic liquids: A combined PFG NMR and X-ray scattering study. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:5510–5517. doi: 10.1039/c3cp00097d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rocha MAA, et al. Alkylimidazolium based ionic liquids: Impact of cation symmetry on their nanoscale structural organization. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:10889–10897. doi: 10.1021/jp406374a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moschovi AM, Dracopoulos V. Structure of protic (HCnImNTf2, n = 0–12) and aprotic (C1CnImNTf2, n = 1–12) imidazolium ionic liquids: A vibrational spectroscopic study. J Mol Liq. 2015;210:189–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ji Y, Shi R, Wang Y, Saielli G. Effect of the chain length on the structure of ionic liquids: From spatial heterogeneity to ionic liquid crystals. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:1104–1109. doi: 10.1021/jp310231f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shimizu K, Bernardes CES, Canongia Lopes JN. Structure and aggregation in the 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquid homologous series. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:567–576. doi: 10.1021/jp409987d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li S, et al. Alkyl chain length and temperature effects on structural properties of pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids: A combined atomistic simulation and small-angle X-ray scattering study. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:125–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aguilera L, Volkner J, Labrador A, Matic A. The effect of lithium salt doping on the nanostructure of ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:27082–27087. doi: 10.1039/c5cp03825a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Russina O, et al. Morphology and intermolecular dynamics of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis{(trifluoromethane)}sulfonylamide ionic liquids: Structural and dynamic evidence of nanoscale segregation. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:424121. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Araque JC, Hettige JJ, Margulis CJ. Modern room temperature ionic liquids, a simple guide to understanding their structure and how it may relate to dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2015;119:12727–12740. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kornyshev AA. Double-layer in ionic liquids: Paradigm change? J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:5545–5557. doi: 10.1021/jp067857o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mezger M, Ocko BM, Reichert H, Deutsch M. Surface layering and melting in an ionic liquid studied by resonant soft X-ray reflectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:3733–3737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211749110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mezger M, et al. Molecular layering of fluorinated ionic liquids at a charged sapphire (0001) surface. Science. 2008;322:424–428. doi: 10.1126/science.1164502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sloutskin E, et al. Surface layering in ionic liquids: An X-ray reflectivity study. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:7796–7804. doi: 10.1021/ja0509679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jeon Y, et al. Interfacial restructuring of ionic liquids determined by sum-frequency generation spectroscopy and X-ray reflectivity. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:19649–19654. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Niga P, et al. Structure of the ethylammonium nitrate surface: An X-ray reflectivity and vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy study. Langmuir. 2010;26:8282–8288. doi: 10.1021/la904697g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lauw Y, et al. X-ray reflectometry studies on the effect of water on the surface structure of [C4mpyr][NTf2] ionic liquid. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:11507–11514. doi: 10.1039/b916046a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wakeham D, Nelson A, Warr GG, Atkin R. Probing the protic ionic liquid surface using X-ray reflectivity. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:20828–20835. doi: 10.1039/c1cp22351h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nishi N, Uruga T, Tanida H, Kakiuchi T. Temperature dependence of multilayering at the free surface of ionic liquids probed by X-ray reflectivity measurements. Langmuir. 2011;27:7531–7536. doi: 10.1021/la200252z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Almeida HFD, et al. Cation alkyl side chain length and symmetry effects on the surface tension of ionic liquids. Langmuir. 2014;30:6408–6418. doi: 10.1021/la501308q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martinez IS, Santos C, Baldelli S. Structural study at the gas-liquid interface of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium alkylsulfates using surface potential measurements. ChemPhysChem. 2012;13:1818–1824. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201100985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lovelock KRJ, Villar-Garcia IJ, Maier F, Steinrueck HP, Licence P. Photoelectron spectroscopy of ionic liquid-based interfaces. Chem Rev. 2010;110:5158–5190. doi: 10.1021/cr100114t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Villar-Garcia IJ, et al. The ionic liquid-vacuum outer atomic surface: A low-energy ion scattering study. Chem Sci. 2014;5:4404–4418. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tesa-Serrate MA, et al. Ionic liquid-vacuum interfaces probed by reactive atom scattering: Influence of alkyl chain length and anion volume. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:5491–5505. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Waring C, Bagot PAJ, Slattery JM, Costen ML, McKendrick KG. O(3P) atoms as a probe of surface ordering in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids. J Phys Chem Lett. 2010;1:429–433. doi: 10.1021/jp912045j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakajima K, Nakanishi S, Lisal M, Kimura K. Surface structure of imidazolium-based ionic liquids: Quantitative comparison between simulations and high-resolution RBS measurements. J Chem Phys. 2016;144:114702. doi: 10.1063/1.4943887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Plechkova NV, Seddon KR. Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:123–150. doi: 10.1039/b006677j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fedorov MV, Kornyshev AA. Ionic liquids at electrified interfaces. Chem Rev. 2014;114:2978–3036. doi: 10.1021/cr400374x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reichert P, et al. Molecular scale structure and dynamics at an ionic liquid/electrode interface. Faraday Discuss. 2018;206:141–157. doi: 10.1039/c7fd00171a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pershan PS, Schlossman ML. Liquid Surfaces and Interfaces: Synchrotron X-Ray Methods. Cambridge Univ Press; Cambridge, UK: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ocko BM, Wu XZ, Sirota EB, Sinha SK, Deutsch M. X-ray reflectivity study of thermal capillary waves on liquid surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;72:242–245. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vaknin D, Bu W, Sung J, Jeon Y, Kim D. Thermally excited capillary waves at vapor/liquid interfaces of water-alcohol mixtures. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:115105. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/11/115105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li T, Xu F, Shi W. Ionic liquid crystals based on 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium cations and perfluorinated sulfonylimide anions. Chem Phys Lett. 2015;628:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weiss H, et al. Mesoscopic correlation functions in heterogeneous ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:620–629. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jeon Y, et al. Surface nanocrystallization of an ionic liquid. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:055502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.055502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Magnussen OM, et al. X-ray reflectivity measurements of surface layering in liquid mercury. Phys Rev Lett. 1995;74:4444–4447. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mezger M, et al. Solid-liquid interfaces of ionic liquid solutions: Interfacial layering and bulk correlations. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:164707. doi: 10.1063/1.4918742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rocha MAA, et al. High-accuracy vapor pressure data of the extended [CnC1im][NTf2] ionic liquid series: Trend changes and structural shifts. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:10919–10926. doi: 10.1021/jp2049316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lovelock KRJ. Influence of the ionic liquid/gas surface on ionic liquid chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:5071–5089. doi: 10.1039/c2cp23851a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Carvalho PJ, Freire MG, Marrucho IM, Queimada AJ, Coutinho JAP. Surface tensions for the 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquids. J Chem Eng Data. 2008;53:1346–1350. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Small DM. The Physical Chemistry of Lipids. Plenum; New York: 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ocko BM, et al. Surface freezing in chain molecules: Normal alkanes. Phys Rev E. 1997;55:3164–3182. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gebbie MA, Dobbs HA, Valtiner M, Israelachvili JN. Long-range electrostatic screening in ionic liquids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7432–7437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508366112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pott T, Méléard P. New insight into the nanostructure of ionic liquids: A small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) study on liquid tri-alkyl-methyl-ammonium bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl) amides and their mixtures. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:5469–5475. doi: 10.1039/b901582e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Esperança JMSS, Guedes HJR, Blesic M, Rebelo LPN. Densities and derived thermodynamic properties of ionic liquids. 3. Phosphonium-based ionic liquids over an extended pressure range. J Chem Eng Data. 2006;51:237–242. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rebelo LPN, et al. Accounting for the unique, doubly dual nature of ionic liquids from a molecular thermodynamic and modeling standpoint. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:1114–1121. doi: 10.1021/ar7000556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rocha MAA, Coutinho JAP, Santos LMNBF. Vapor pressures of 1,3-dialkylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquids with long alkyl chains. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:134502. doi: 10.1063/1.4896704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Koeddermann T, Paschek D, Ludwig R. Ionic liquids: Dissecting the enthalpies of vaporization. Chem Phys Chem. 2008;9:549–555. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200700814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Verevkin SP, et al. Making sense of enthalpy of vaporization trends for ionic liquids: New experimental and simulation data show a simple linear relationship and help reconcile previous data. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:6473–6486. doi: 10.1021/jp311429r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shimizu K, Tariq M, Gomes MFC, Rebelo LPN, Lopes JNC. Assessing the dispersive and electrostatic components of the cohesive energy of ionic liquids using molecular dynamics simulations and molar refraction data. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:5831–5834. doi: 10.1021/jp101910c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Paredes X, et al. Bulk and liquid-vapor interface of pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids: A molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:731–742. doi: 10.1021/jp406651f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fujii K, et al. Experimental evidences for molecular origin of low-q peak in neutron/X-ray scattering of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide ionic liquids. J Chem Phys. 2011;135:244502. doi: 10.1063/1.3672097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee K, Lee C, Lin IB. First example of interdigitated u-shape benzimidazolium ionic liquid crystals. Chem Commun. 1997;1997:899–900. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Matsumoto K, Hagiwara R. Structural characteristics of alkylimidazolium-based salts containing fluoroanions. J Fluor Chem. 2007;128:317–331. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bradley AE, et al. Small-angle X-ray scattering studies of liquid crystalline 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium salts. Chem Mat. 2002;14:629–635. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hardacre C, Holbrey JD, Mullan CL, Youngs TGA, Bowron DT. Small angle neutron scattering from 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ionic liquids ([Cnmim][PF6], n = 4, 6, and 8) J Chem Phys. 2010;133:074510. doi: 10.1063/1.3473825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Paulechka YU, et al. IR and X-ray study of polymorphism in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imides. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:9538–9546. doi: 10.1021/jp903702c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Franks N, Abraham M, Lieb W. Molecular-organization of liquid n-octanol: An X-ray diffraction analysis. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82:466–470. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600820507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Triolo A, Russina O, Fazio B, Triolo R, Di Cola E. Morphology of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate room temperature ionic liquids. Chem Phys Lett. 2008;457:362–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Shimizu K, Tariq M, Freitas AA, Padua AAH, Lopes JNC. Self-organization in ionic liquids: From bulk to interfaces and films. J Braz Chem Soc. 2016;27:349–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Aoun B, et al. Nanoscale heterogeneity in alkyl-methylimidazolium bromide ionic liquids. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:104509. doi: 10.1063/1.3563540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Annapureddy HVR, Kashyap HK, De Biase PM, Margulis CJ. What is the origin of the prepeak in the X-ray scattering of imidazolium-based room-temperature ionic liquids? J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:16838–16846. doi: 10.1021/jp108545z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brambilla L, Zerbi G. Local order in liquid n-alkanes: Evidence from Raman spectroscopic study. Macromolecules. 2005;38:3327–3333. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tanford CA. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes. 2nd Ed Wiley; New York: 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lu X, et al. Bilayer order in a polycarbazole-conjugated polymer. Nat Commun. 2012;3:795. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tariq M, et al. High-temperature surface tension and density measurements of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bistriflamide ionic liquids. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010;294:131–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kaganer V, Mohwald H, Dutta P. Structure and phase transitions in Langmuir monolayers. Rev Mod Phys. 1999;71:779–819. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chacon E, Reinaldo-Falagan M, Velasco E, Tarazona P. Layering at free liquid surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:166101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.166101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tarazona P, Chacon E, Bresme F. Intrinsic profiles and the structure of liquid surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter. 2012;24:284123. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/28/284123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mo H, et al. Observation of surface layering in a nonmetallic liquid. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:096107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.096107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chattopadhyay S, et al. Structural signal of a dynamic glass transition. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103:175701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.175701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pershan PS. Structure of Liquid Crystal Phases. World Sci; Singapore: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ocko BM, Braslau A, Pershan PS, Als-Nielsen J, Deutsch M. Quantized layer growth at liquid-crystal surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;57:923–923. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Niedermeyer H, Hallett JP, Villar-Garcia IJ, Hunt PA, Welton T. Mixtures of ionic liquids. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:7780–7802. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35177c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chatel G, Pereira JFB, Debbeti V, Wang H, Rogers RD. Mixing ionic liquids – “Simple mixtures” or double salts? Green Chem. 2014;16:2051–2083. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nakajima K, Miyashita M, Suzuki M, Kimura K. Surface structures of binary mixtures of imidazolium-based ionic liquids using high-resolution Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy and time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:224701. doi: 10.1063/1.4838376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sloutskin E, et al. Demixing transition in a quasi-two-dimensional surface-frozen layer. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89:065501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.065501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mechler S, et al. Self-consistent interpretation of the 2D structure of the liquid au82si18 surface: Bending rigidity and the Debye-Waller effect. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:186101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.186101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Honkimäki V, Reichert H, Okasinski JS, Dosch H. X-ray optics for liquid surface/interface spectrometers. J Synch Rad. 2006;13:426–431. doi: 10.1107/S0909049506031438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Murphy BM, et al. A novel X-ray diffractometer for studies of liquid-liquid interfaces. J Synch Rad. 2014;21:45–56. doi: 10.1107/S1600577513026192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Smilgies DM, Boudet N, Struth B, Konovalov O. Troika II: A versatile beamline for the study of liquid and solid interfaces. J Synch Rad. 2005;12:329–339. doi: 10.1107/S0909049505000361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Als-Nielsen J, McMorrow D. Elements of Modern X-Ray Physics. Wiley; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mars J, et al. Surface induced smectic order in ionic liquids—An X-ray reflectivity study of [C22C1im]+[NTf2]- Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19:26651–26661. doi: 10.1039/c7cp04852a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.201716418SI.pdf (291.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES