Abstract
Fractures are a common comorbidity in children with the neural tube defect (NTD) spina bifida. Mutations in the Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway contribute to NTDs in humans and mice, but whether this pathway independently determines bone mass is poorly understood. Here, we first confirmed that core Wnt/PCP components are expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro. In vivo, we performed detailed µCT comparisons of bone structure in tibiae from young male mice heterozygous for NTD-associated mutations versus WT littermates. PCP signalling disruption caused by Vangl2 (Vangl2Lp/+) or Celsr1 (Celsr1Crsh/+) mutations significantly reduced trabecular bone mass and distal tibial cortical thickness. NTD-associated mutations in non-PCP transcription factors were also investigated. Pax3 mutation (Pax3Sp2H/+) had minimal effects on bone mass. Zic2 mutation (Zic2Ku/+) significantly altered the position of the tibia/fibula junction and diminished cortical bone in the proximal tibia. Beyond these genes, we bioinformatically documented the known extent of shared genetic networks between NTDs and bone properties. 46 genes involved in neural tube closure are annotated with bone-related ontologies. These findings document shared genetic networks between spina bifida risk and bone structure, including PCP components and Zic2. Genetic variants which predispose to spina bifida may therefore independently diminish bone mass.
Introduction
Genetic analyses of rare human diseases associated with altered fracture risk have identified critical determinants of bone mass and architecture, some of which are now established clinical targets1. Fracture incidence in the general population follows a biphasic epidemiological pattern with a high incidence in childhood, a low incidence following skeletal maturity, increasing again in women following the menopause and in both men and women with age2,3. Progress has been made in delineating the genetic and pathophysiological basis of osteoporosis-related fragility fractures in the elderly4,5, whereas fractures during childhood have been less intensively studied. A number of genetic conditions presenting in childhood with primary skeletal disorders, such as osteogenesis imperfecta associated with mutations in the Wingless homology (Wnt) ligand Wnt16, are now recognised, while multigenic disorders such as Down’s syndrome are also directly associated with skeletal effects7.
Paediatric fractures are important comorbidities in rare and multigenic conditions that do not primarily present with skeletal phenotypes, as is the case in paediatric spina bifida (myelomeningocele)8–11 patients. The best established risk factor for fractures in affected children is being non-ambulatory9,10, consistent with mechanical loading being the major functional determinant of bone mass and architecture. However, in a subset of patients primary skeletal disorders may also be involved. This is suggested by reports of fractures during childbirth and the neonatal period12,13 as well as low trauma fractures in ambulatory children11. Furthermore, differences in tibial mass and architecture in affected infants, independently of the degree of paralysis, have previously been described14. Specifically, tibiae from affected perinatal infants had smaller cortical area and thickness than age-matched infants who died for unrelated reasons, and their cross-sectional geometry clustered into groups with normal, increased or decreased eccentricity (a perfect circle has an eccentricity of 0)14.
Spina bifida and associated neural tube defects (NTDs) continue to affect around 1:1,000 pregnancies, with higher incidence in some geographical areas such as Northern China and in high risk groups such as those who have previously had an affected pregnancy15,16. Two molecular pathways clearly associated with spina bifida risk in humans are folate metabolism and the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway, a non-canonical branch of Wnt signalling16. In mice, over two hundred genes have been identified which, when mutated, result in NTDs including spina bifida17,18. Some of these, such as components of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway19, are very well established to have critical skeletal roles independently of their role in neural tube closure. This raises the hypothesis that genetic variants which predispose to spina bifida may independently diminish bone mass. However the extent of the genetic commonalities between NTD risk and skeletal functional competence has not been systematically investigated.
Recently we reported that osteoblasts from NTD-predisposed Loop tail (Lp) mice which carry a heterozygous dominant negative mutation of Vangl2, a core PCP component, are less able to reorient their divisions following mechanical strain in vitro20. The PCP pathway is highly conserved from mammals to Drosophila, in which its core components follow highly polarized distributions in embryonic epithelia21. The pathway is activated by non-canonical Wnt ligands such as Wnt5a binding to the frizzled (Fzd) Wnt co-receptors. These cluster with the trans-membrane proteins Vangl1/2 and Celsr1-3, recruiting intracellular proteins including scribbled (Scrib) and dishevelled (Dvl). The outcomes of PCP signalling include regulation of gene expression through the JNK/c-Jun pathway as well as cytoskeletal reorganisation through Rho/ROCK signalling.
The roles of this pathway in mammals have primarily been studied in cancer and in development, primarily due to its role in convergent extension movements which narrow and elongate the early embryo22. Homozygous Lp mutation results in shorter but wider and thicker early limb buds and digit pre-chondrogenic condensates, as well as delayed ossification and absence of the middle phalanx in all digits23. This phenotype is exacerbated by heterozygous deletion of the PCP ligand Wnt5a, whereas homozygous Wnt5a deletion results in near-complete absence of digit mineralisation23,24. The roles of Wnt5a in osteoblasts and osteoclasts have been extensively studied. Its expression increases biphasically during osteoblastic differentiation25 and it promotes osteoclastic resorption in association with its alternate receptor, receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 226. However, whether its roles in postnatal bone include interactions with core PCP components are understudied.
We previously reported that Wnt5a mRNA increases rapidly in osteoblast-like cells subjected to strain in vitro20. In vivo, young female Vanlg2Lp/+ mice without spina bifida had lower distal femoral trabecular bone mass and a more circular mid-shaft cross-section than wild-type (WT) littermates20. This finding suggests that the PCP pathway influences post-natal bone mass and architecture and identifies a mouse genotype, known to be at increased risk of NTDs, which independently has low bone mass. This initial skeletal phenotyping was undertaken at a single pre-selected site of the femur, however, recent methodological developments now allow systematic analyses of cross-sectional bone mass and architecture across the bone’s length. For example, Site Specificity Analysis (SSA)27, has demonstrated that locally- and systemically-acting interventions can have site-specific effects on bone. SSA analysis has not yet been applied to document the effects of PCP pathway disruption on bone mass and architecture.
In this study we determined the expression of core PCP components during osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vitro. The relevance of this pathway to bone in vivo was investigated by applying SSA to study tibial structure in heterozygous Lp versus wild-type (WT) young male mice (assaying an additional bone and sex from that previously studied). To determine whether the roles of PCP signalling in bone extend beyond Vangl2, we similarly applied SSA to tibiae from Crash (Crsh) mice which carry a heterozygous mutation in another core PCP component, Celsr1, as well as in two non-PCP gene models, Splotch (Sp2H) and Kumba (Ku), which carry NTD-associated mutations in the transcription factors Pax3 and Zic2 respectively. Homozygous mutations of each of the genes tested result in NTDs with high or complete penetrance and render the mice non-viable, whereas a small proportion of heterozygous embryos develop spina bifida (Vangl2Lp/+ ~5%28, Celsr1Crsh/+ predisposed when modifier genes also mutated29, Pax3Sp/+ ~6%30, Zic2Ku/+ ~3%31). To determine whether commonalities extend beyond the genes directly investigated here, we subsequently document the known extent of shared genetic networks between NTD risk and bone-related functions.
Results
Core mammalian Wnt/PCP components are expressed in bone cells
Core components of the mammalian Wnt/PCP pathway are expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Analysis of a previously-reported RNA-Seq dataset32 confirmed PCP pathway components are detectably expressed in bone and marrow of adult mice (Fig. 1A,B). In cultured osteoblasts, expression of Vangl2 and Celsr1 was increased in mature, mineralising osteoblasts (day 21) compared to differentiating cells (day 7). Vangl1 and Scrib mRNA expression was not significantly altered during osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 1C). In contrast, Vangl1 and Scrib mRNA expression was increased in mature, actively resorbing osteoclasts (day 9, two days following medium acidification) compared to mature, inactive osteoclasts (day 7). Vangl2 and Celsr1 mRNA expression was unaffected by osteoclast activation. This data demonstrates that core PCP components are expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts.
Vangl2 mutation diminishes trabecular bone mass
Male mice carrying a heterozygous Vangl2 mutation, Vangl2Lp/+, displayed diminished trabecular bone mass. Young male Vangl2Lp/+ mice had lower bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV, −35.0% on average), trabecular number (Tb.N, −29.2%) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, −8.7%), and higher trabecular pattern factor (Tb.Pf, +5.7%) and structure model index (SMI, +18.7%) than Vangl2+/+ littermates (Fig. 2A–F). Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) was unchanged (Supplementary Table S1).
Detailed analysis of tibial cortical bone using SSA identified minimal effects of Vangl2Lp/+ mutation on cortical bone mass (Fig. 3). Cortical area (Ct.Ar) was 3.3% lower on average across all sites in tibiae from Vangl2Lp/+ than Vangl2+/+ mice (Fig. 3A) whereas total tissue area (Tt.Ar) was not significantly different (Fig. 3B). Medullary area (Ma.Ar) was bigger (+7.8% across all sites, Fig. 3C) whereas cross-sectional thickness (Cs.Th) was smaller (−3.7% across all sites, Fig. 3D) on average in tibiae from Vangl2Lp/+ mice. These differences were not associated with a significant change in polar moment of inertia (PMI, a computed parameter associated with bone strength, Fig. 3E). Although none of the differences overserved were site-specific (genotype * site interaction p > 0.10 in each case), the differences in Ct.Ar reached significance in the proximal tibiae (Fig. 3A) whereas differences in Ma.Ar and Cs.Th were significant at sites distal to the tibia/fibula junction (Fig. 3C,D).
Eccentricity, which is a measure of cross-sectional circularity rather than mass, was significantly higher in the proximal tibia of Vangl2Lp/+ than Vangl2+/+ mice (Fig. 3F).
Celsr1 mutation diminishes trabecular bone mass and mid-shaft cortical thickness
Mice carrying the heterozygous Celsr1 mutation, Celsr1Crsh/+, displayed diminished trabecular bone mass, similarly to that seen in heterozygous Loop tail mice, demonstrating other components of the PCP signalling pathway also contribute to this bone compartment. Specifically, young Celsr1Crsh/+ male mice had lower BV/TV (−41.0%), Tb.N (−23.5%) and Tb.Th (−15.5%), and higher Tb.Pf (+44.4%) and SMI (+16.5%) than Celsr1+/+ mice (Fig. 4A–F and Supplementary Table S2).
In the tibial cortical compartment, the Crsh mutation in Celsr1 was associated with smaller Ct.Ar and Tt.Ar compared with Celsr1+/+ littermates (−11.0% and −5.7% on average across all sites respectively, Fig. 5A,B). Ma.Ar was regionally higher (Fig. 5C) in the same region of the tibia affected by mutation of Vangl2. The Crsh mutation had a more pronounced effect on Cs.Th (−14.7% across all sites), reducing it primarily in the distal tibia below the tibia-fibula junction, and consequently reducing PMI (−14.0% across all sites) significantly in the same region (Fig. 5D,E,E’). None of the differences observed were site-specific (genotype * site interaction p > 0.10 in each case).
Contrary to the effect of the Lp mutation, Crsh reduced eccentricity (Fig. 5F).
Mutation of the non-PCP gene, Pax3 minimally affects bone mass
Pax3 mRNA expression was below the limit of reading in osteoblast and osteoclast cultures (CT > 35 cycles whereas CT values in E9.5 mouse embryo RNA used as positive controls were 26.3 ± 0.7 cycles, mean ± SEM, n = 3). Consistent with this, heterozygous mutation of Pax3 (Pax3Sp2H/+) in the Splotch mouse, did not significantly alter trabecular bone structure and minimally affected cortical bone in the tibia of young male mice. None of the standard measures of trabecular bone mass and architecture were significantly different between Pax3Sp2H/+ and Pax3+/+ littermates (Supplementary Table S3).
Ct.Ar, Tt.Ar and PMI were unchanged between Pax3Sp2H/+ and Pax3+/+ littermates, whereas Ma.Ar was significantly larger and Cs.Th was smaller (+4.8% and −7.1% on average across all sites respectively), primarily in a localised region of the distal tibia Supplementary Figure S1). None of the differences observed were site-specific (genotype * site interaction p > 0.10 in each case).
Unlike the PCP mutants analysed above, eccentricity was not different between Pax3 genotypes (Supplementary Figure S1).
Mutation of the non-PCP gene Zic2 diminishes cortical bone structure
Zic2 mRNA expression increased in mineralising (day 21) relative to differentiating (day 7) osteoblasts and tended to increase in resorbing (day 9) versus mature (day 7) osteoclasts (Supplementary Figure S2).
Heterozygous mutation of Zic2 (Zic2Ku/+) in the Kumba (Ku) mouse diminished cortical bone mass without altering trabecular bone in the tibia of young male mice. None of the standard measures of trabecular bone mass and architecture assessed were significantly different between Zic2Ku/+ and Zic2+/+ littermates (Supplementary Table S4). In cortical bone, SSA revealed that the tibia/fibula junction was significantly more proximal, as a percentage of the bone’s length, in Zic2Ku/+ than littermate Zic2+/+ (2.5% more proximal on average, Fig. 6A). Tibial length was unchanged (Supplementary Table S4). The shift in tibia/fibula junction position is clearly visible in SSA plots of tibial eccentricity, which show a sharp change at the point the tibia and fibula become separated (Fig. 6B). To account for this, the analysis of each tibia was adjusted such that the tibia/fibula junction was defined as being at 61% of the bones length (average junction position across the two genotypes). Applying this normalisation reduced the observed differences in cortical bone mass (e.g. at the 20% site of the proximal tibia, Ct.Ar was on average 34% lower in Zic2Ku/+ than littermate Zic2+/+ prior to normalisation and 27% lower following normalisation).
Following normalisation young male Zic2Ku/+ mice had lower Ct.Ar (−13.4% across all sites), Tt.Ar (−12.0% across all sites) and Ma.Ar (−6.5% across all sites) than Zic2+/+ littermates, with differences reaching significance at various sites in the proximal tibia (Fig. 7A–C). The reduction in Tt.Ar was site specific (site * genotype interaction p = 0.045). Cs.Th was unchanged, but PMI was smaller (−17.6% across all sites) in tibiae of Zic2Ku/+ mice (Fig. 7D,E).
Although normalising the position of the tibia/fibula junction largely restored the otherwise marked apparent effect of the Zic2 mutation, eccentricity was nonetheless greater compared with Zic2+/+ littermates in the proximal tibia and immediately distal to the tibia/fibula junction (Fig. 7F).
Interlinked networks of genes involved in neural tube closure have skeletal functions
NTD determinants and bone-related functions share genetic networks which extend beyond PCP signalling and Zic2. 259 genes were identified to be involved in mouse neural tube closure based on literature reviews published by Harris and Juriloff17,18 and genotypes annotated as having “abnormal neural tube closure” by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium or Deciphering Mechanisms of Developmental Disorders consortia (as of May 2017, Fig. 8A). This NTD genes list is significantly enriched for biological processes containing “bone”, “osteoblast” or “osteoclast” terms (p < 0.05 in each case, Fig. 8B). These terms are associated with 46 genes (Supplementary Table S5) that indicate genetic commonalities between NTD phenotypes and skeletal functions. These 46 genes form an interlinked network (Fig. 8C) of genes with well-known functions in bone including secreted ligands or their receptors (e.g. Fgfr1, Bmp2, Wnt3a), intracellular signalling molecules (e.g. Rac1, Mapk8) and transcriptional regulators (e.g. Rara/g, Msx1, Dlx5). Indeed, various signalling pathways with key functions in bone are significantly over-represented in this list (Fig. 8D). The most over-represented pathway is Wnt signalling (12 genes, adjusted p < 1 × 10−13), including known components of the canonical Wnt pathway such as Wnt3a and Lrp6. Core components of the PCP pathway and Zic2 did not feature, reflecting the current lack of knowledge of these genes’ functions in bone.
Discussion
Here we tested the hypothesis that mouse genotypes predisposed to spina bifida independently have diminished bone mass. Hypothesis based selection of genes with well-established roles in neural tube closure confirmed that the PCP pathway contributes to trabecular bone mass, as well as implicating Zic2 in the determination of cortical bone mass. Unbiased bioinformatics analysis of genes known to be involved in neural tube closure identified 46 genes with annotated roles in bone, primarily involving bone development and osteoblast functions. This demonstrates genetic commonalities, at least in mice, between NTDs and bone properties. Implied functional commonalities between NTDs and bone competence may compound with other fracture risk factors such as disuse and vitamin D deficiency in spina bifida patients9–11.
The importance of PCP signalling to skeletal development is clearly shown by limb dysmorphogenesis in Vangl2Lp/Lp embryos, Vangl2/Wnt5a double mutant embryos, and Prickle1 mutants23,24,33. However, the post-natal roles of PCP and specifically Vangl2 in bone are poorly understood. In order to confirm the potential relevance of PCP signalling to bone biology we first confirmed expression of several known core pathway components. While Vangl1 and Scrib were expressed at stable levels during osteoblastic differentiation in vitro, expression of both Vangl2 and Celsr1 increased significantly with differentiation and the onset of mineralisation. This is consistent with a previous report that deletion of the PCP downstream component Jnk1 diminishes late osteoblastic differentiation in vitro and decreases bone formation in vivo34. In contrast, Vangl1 and Scrib expression increased in resorbing osteoclastic cells in vitro. What functions of these cells are promoted or inhibited by the PCP pathway is not known, but roles of this pathway in other cell types include coordination of cell migration35,36, extracellular matrix remodelling37, and organisation of the actin cytoskeleton38,39. This is consistent with our previous report that prevention of strain-related actin regulation by the PCP down-stream component ROCK, or mutation of Vangl2 in cortical osteoblasts from Lp mice, in each case prevented reorientation of cell division20. Of note, Vangl2 protein follows a planar-polarised distribution along the proximal to distal axis of developing chondrocytes and WT Vangl2 protein retains this distribution in heterozygous Vangl2Lp/+ fetuses40, despite the Lp allele having dominant negative effects in other contexts41.
Analyses of Lp mice have delineated roles for Vangl2 in various organs including the lungs42 and kidneys43, in which it is involved in branching morphogenesis. It is therefore intriguing that Vangl2 mutation primarily diminishes bone mass in the branched, trabecular compartment, particularly as both of the PCP mutant genotypes investigated here primarily had a reduced number of trabeculae. This finding is consistent between the femur of female mice previously reported20 and the tibia of male mice studied here. Vangl2 mutation had minimal effects in the cortical compartment, which was extensively mapped using SSA in the present study thereby providing a more global representation of their skeletal phenotype than can be achieved by analysing individual sites. However, whereas Vangl2 mutation decreased eccentricity in the femoral midshaft20, it resulted in greater eccentricity in the proximal tibia. This discrepancy may be due to differences in muscle insertion between the two sites, or structural functional adaptations of the tibia such as those involved in stress damping given the reduction in proximal trabecular bone44,45.
Paradoxically, Celsr1 mutation mildly but significantly reduced eccentricity in the proximal tibia and around the tibia/fibula junction. Although the cellular or biomechanical bases for these differences are not known, they confirm that PCP signalling influences this parameter whereas, for example, the Pax3Sp2H mutation does not. Differences in cross-sectional eccentricity have previously been reported in human infants with spina bifida14, although it is not known whether these patients had mutations in PCP pathway components. Unique sequence variants in both VANGL2 and CELSR1 have been previously identified in human spina bifida patients46,47, but to the authors’ knowledge skeletal structure has not been investigated in these patients. To our knowledge, all deleterious mutations in PCP genes associated with NTDs in humans reported to date have been identified in heterozygous patients, which is presumed to reflect multigenic aetiologies underlying these conditions48. Bone phenotypes identified in heterozygous mice in the present study may therefore be relevant to human NTD patients with heterozygous PCP mutations.
In the present study, mutation of Celsr1 in the Crsh mice was found to be associated with more marked reduction in cortical bone mass than Vangl2 mutation in Lp mice (i.e. 11.0% versus 3.3% reduction in Ct.Ar on average across all sites). A potential explanation for this is partial compensation for Vangl2 by Vangl149, although Vangl1 does not compensate for Vangl2 during neural tube closure29. Cortical thickness was particularly reduced around the tibia/fibula junction of Celsr1Crsh/+ mice, where tissue area was reduced (suggesting diminished periosteal expansion) whereas the medullary area was increased (suggesting greater endosteal expansion in these rapidly growing mice). The cell-specific roles of Vangl2 and Celsr1 in the osteoblast and osteoclast lineage are not currently known and merit investigation through targeted deletion. Nonetheless, the findings presented here confirm that PCP signalling enhances post-natal bone mass, particularly in the trabecular compartment.
In contrast, the heterozygous Pax3Sp2H mutation had no significant effect on trabecular bone and minimal effects in the cortical compartment. Homozygous Pax3 mutation results in NTDs and also diminishes embryonic muscle development, which is associated with skeletal dysmorphology50. The interpretation that skeletal phenotypes in homozygous Pax3 mutants are secondary to reduced muscle formation50 is consistent with our findings that Pax3 is not expressed at detectable levels in osteoblast or osteoclast cultures at various stages of differentiation. Consequently, haploinsufficiency for Pax3 minimally altered tibial bone mass postnatally in male mice at the age investigated here despite these mice having detectable phenotypes in other organs; most notably the characteristic white ventral skin spot which gives the line its name51. Given our analyses of young male mice, we cannot exclude the possibility of deterioration (or indeed resolution) of skeletal phenotypes with age. Nonetheless, the young mice used in this study may be most relevant to paediatric cohorts. Fracture incidence in spina bifida patients, as in the general population, decreases in adulthood10.
As well as potentially contributing to a minority of spina bifida cases (at least in a Dutch population)52, ZIC2 mutations are also directly associated with holoprosencephaly in humans53. We chose to study mutation of this gene because it causes fully penetrant spina bifida in mice54 and a polymorphism in it has previously been associated with reduced hip bone mineral density in a Chinese population55. Unexpectedly, we observed that tibial structure in Zic2Ku/+ mice was substantially different from their littermate controls in that their tibia/fibula junction was more proximally positioned. The genetic and/or environmental control of this anatomical landmark is not known, in part because it is not commonly analysed, reflecting an additional advantage of the global SSA approach we have used. In addition, Zic2 mutation was associated with a significant reduction in cortical bone mass, site-specifically in the proximal region of the tibia. Intriguingly, this is the region of the tibia most responsive to axial mechanical loading27 and the associated transcription factor Zic1 translocates to the nucleus following mechanical stimulation of osteocyte-like cells in vitro56. Further work will be required to determine whether Zic transcription factors contribute to functional adaptation in vivo. An alternative mechanisms by which Zic2 may influence bone mass includes its known regulation of hedgehog signalling, which plays diverse roles in skeletal physiology and pathology57. Zic2 binds with the hedgehog pathway transcriptional regulator Gli and promotes its nuclear translocation58. Both Gli3 and Ptch1, another member of the hedgehog pathway, featured in the list of genetic commonalities between NTDs and bone. Zic2 has also recently been reported to be over-expressed in osteosarcoma cells59, in which it promotes viability and migration through a PI3K/AKT-dependant mechanism. Whether Zic2 promotes the same processes in non-neoplastic osteoblastic cells is not known.
Despite our findings that Zic2Ku/+, Vangl2Lp/+ and Celsr1Crsh/+ mice all have significantly lower bone mass than their WT littermates, none of these genes featured in an unbiased analysis of the known commonality between the genetic networks involved in NTDs and bone. This reflects the current lack of knowledge of these genes’ roles in bone, contrasting with the well-established roles of canonical Wnt signalling which substantially influences processes including osteoblast differentiation60 and bones’ functional adaptation to mechanical loading61. Specific Wnt pathway components are now important clinical targets for the treatment of osteoporosis62. Human syndromes associated with high or low bone mass caused by mutations in Wnt pathway components are not, to our knowledge, associated with NTDs. However, this is unsurprising given redundant expression of some Wnt pathway components during development (e.g. Lrp5 and Lrp6 redundantly control embryonic skeletogenesis63) and bone-specific expression of other proteins (e.g. of sclerostin primarily in osteocytes64). Wnt signalling was the most prominently enriched pathway in the NTD/bone overlapping genes list, which included canonical Wnt pathway components. Although PCP and canonical Wnt branches may be mutually antagonistic in other contexts65, both appear to promote bone mass in mice.
In summary, this study confirms extensive commonalities between molecular networks involved in successful neural tube closure in mice and those that determine bone structure. Our findings extend these commonalities to include two core components of the PCP pathway, Vangl2 and Celsr1, as well as Zic2. Detailed analysis of tibial structure revealed that mutation of either PCP component substantially diminished trabecular bone mass, whereas Zic2 mutation diminished cortical bone in a site-specific manner. Importantly, each of these effects was seen following heterozygous mutation of the gene in question. In as far as these findings can be extrapolated to humans, they suggest heterozygous mutations in these pathways may predispose to low bone mass even in spina bifida patients whose neurodevelopmental defect has multi-allelic bases66. Extension of these findings through human genetic and clinical studies may allow stratification of patients at high risk of fracture in spina bifida cohorts, as well as in other conditions associated with mutations in these genes, and determine whether they substantially contribute to fracture risk in the wider population.
Methods
Mouse models
Studies were performed under project license number 70/7469 under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the Medical Research Council’s Responsibility in the Use of Animals for Medical Research (1993) in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All analyses were performed on 21 day old male mice sacrificed at the time of weaning, representing a rapidly-growing “paediatric” stage. Mutant and WT littermates were always included from each litter, analysing n = 8 of each genotype. Loop tail mice carry a mutation in Vangl267, Crash (Crsh) mice a mutation in Celsr129, Splotch (Sp2H) mice a deletion in Pax368, and Kumba (Ku) mice a mutation in Zic254 as previously described. Although heterozygous mutation of the genes analysed occasionally result in NTDs, only unaffected mice were used in this study. As expected all Vangl2Lp/+, all Celsr1Crsh/+ and one of the Zic2Ku/+ mice had looped or kinked tails believed to reflect secondary neurulation defects, whereas Pax3Sp2H/+ mice have a ventral area of depigmentation associated with defective neural crest migration.
Mouse body weights and tibial lengths were not significantly different between any of the mutants and their WT littermates at the age investigated (Supplementary Tables 1–4).
Bioinformatics analysis
Enriched gene ontology terms were identified using BiNGO analysis in Cytoscape69 as previously reported70. Interacting protein networks and KEGG pathway enrichments were identified and visualised using StringDB71. Network diagram links are based on experimental evidence and curated datasets, with line thickness indicating the strength of supporting data.
µCT and Site Specificity Analysis
Tibiae were dissected immediately following euthanasia and dehydrated in 70% ethanol. Tibiae were scanned using a Skyscan 1176 micro-CT scanner (Bruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium). All scans were taken at 50 kV, 500 µA with 0.5 mm aluminium filter, and 0.4° rotation step. Individual 2D cross-sectional images were reconstructed using Bruker NRecon software version 1.6.10.2. Voxel resolution was 9 µm.
Trabecular analysis of the proximal tibia was performed by manually drawing around the trabecular region of interest as previously reported20, blinded to genotype. A 1 mm region starting 0.2 mm below the bottom of the growth plate was analysed and values for standard trabecular parameters are included in Supplementary Tables 1–4. Extensive cortical analysis was performed using SSA as previously described and validated27. SSA quantifies standard cross-sectional measures of bone mass and architecture at each one percent site of the bone’s length between 10% proximally and 90% distally. SSA data is shown as the mean ± SEM at each 1% site.
Osteoblast and osteoclast cultures
Osteoblasts were isolated from the calvariae of 3–5 day old C57BL/6 mice by trypsin/collagenase digestion as previously described72,73. Cells were cultured for up to 21 days in alpha Minimum Essential Medium, (αMEM) supplemented with 2 mM β-glycerophosphate and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, with half medium changes every 3 days.
Osteoclasts were isolated from the long bones of 6–8 week-old C57BL/6 mice as described previously74. Cells were plated onto 5 mm diameter dentine discs (106 cells) in 96-multiwells in αMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 5% gentamicin, 100 nM PGE2, 200 ng/ml M-CSF and 3 ng/ml receptor activator of nuclear factor ΚB ligand (RANKL, R&D Systems Europe Ltd, Abingdon, UK). After 24 hours, discs containing adherent osteoclast precursors were transferred to 6-well trays (4 discs/well in 4 ml medium) for a further 6 days. Culture medium was acidified to pH~7.0 by the addition 10 meq/l H+ (as HCl) on day 7 to activate resorption74 and osteoclasts were cultured for a further 2 days.
Total RNA extraction and DNase treatment
Osteoclasts were cultured on dentine discs for 7 (mature cells) or 9 days (mature, resorbing cells) before total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL® reagent (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Osteoblasts were cultured for 7 (differentiating), 14 (mature) and 21 (mature, bone-forming) days before RNA collection. Extracted RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase I (35U/ml) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was terminated by heat inactivation at 65 °C for 10 min. Total RNA was quantified spectrophotometrically by measuring absorbance at 260 nM. RNA was stored at −80 °C until amplification by qRT-PCR.
Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Osteoclast and osteoblast RNA (50ng) was transcribed and amplified using the qPCRBIO SyGreen one-step qRT-PCR kit (PCR Biosystems, London, UK), which allows cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification to be carried out sequentially. qRT-PCR was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions with initial cDNA synthesis (45 °C for 10 min) and reverse transcriptase inactivation (95 °C for 2 min) followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 5 sec) and detection (60 °C for 30 sec). All reactions were carried out in triplicate using RNAs derived from 4–6 different cultures. Primer sequences (for/rev): Vangl1, acggagagtcccgcttctac/aattttccagaaccaccaagg: Vangl2, ccagccgcttctacaatgtc/tctccaggatccacactgc: Celsr1, ggcagtcatgaccttggacta/agctgattcccaatctgcac: Scrib, ccaccacggaagaagatgac/gttattggcctggtcaaacg: Zic2, tgcatgtccacacctcagat/gaggggaggactcatggac: Pax3, gcccacgtctattccacaa/gaatagtgctttggtgtacagtgc.
Statistical analysis
Bioinformatics comparisons were based on the standard false discovery rate corrections applied by the software. Comparisons between two groups were by t-test and between three groups by one way ANOVA. SSA comparisons were by mixed model analysis in IBM SPSS Statistics 22 accounting from repeated measures at different sites from each mouse testing the main effects of genotype and site with a genotype by site interaction (indicating site-specificity of effects) as previously reported27. When the overall genotype effect was significant a Bonferroni post-hoc correction was applied to identify sites of significant difference. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
GLG is funded by a Wellcome Trust Postdoctoral Clinical Research Training Fellowship (107474/Z/15/Z). RO acknowledges funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK (BB/G010579/1 and BB/LO21072/1). IRO acknowledges funding from the British Heart Foundation (PG/15/13/31296). AJC and NG acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust (087525 to AC, NG), the Medical Research Council (J003794 to NG, AC; K022741 to PS, NG, AC) and the Bo Hjelt Spina Bifida Foundation (to AC). NG and PS are supported by Great Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity. This research was supported by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. IRO, PS and GLG are members of the Bloomsbury Centre for Skeletal Research.
Author Contributions
G.L.G., A.J.C., P.S. and N.D.E.G. designed the study. S.L., I.R.O., D.S. and G.L.G. performed the experiments. G.L.G. and I.R.O. analysed the data. G.L.G., R.O., I.R.O., A.J.C. and N.D.E.G. provided material. All authors approve the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-21718-x.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Karasik D, Rivadeneira F, Johnson ML. The genetics of bone mass and susceptibility to bone diseases. Nature reviews. Rheumatology. 2016;12:323–334. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cooper C, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Bishop N, van Staa TP. Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19:1976–1981. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.040902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Curtis EM, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in the United Kingdom 1988-2012: Variation with age, sex, geography, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Bone. 2016;87:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Estrada K, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture. Nature genetics. 2012;44:491–501. doi: 10.1038/ng.2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zheng HF, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies EN1 as a determinant of bone density and fracture. Nature. 2015;526:112–117. doi: 10.1038/nature14878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Makitie, R. E., Kampe, A. J., Taylan, F. & Makitie, O. Recent Discoveries in Monogenic Disorders of Childhood Bone Fragility. Current osteoporosis reports, 10.1007/s11914-017-0388-6 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Kamalakar A, Harris JR, McKelvey KD, Suva LJ. Aneuploidy and skeletal health. Current osteoporosis reports. 2014;12:376–382. doi: 10.1007/s11914-014-0221-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marreiros H, Loff C, Calado E. Osteoporosis in paediatric patients with spina bifida. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2012;35:9–21. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martinelli V, et al. Risk of fracture prevention in spina bifida patients: correlation between bone mineral density, vitamin D, and electrolyte values. Child’s nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2015;31:1361–1365. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2726-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trinh A, et al. Fractures in spina bifida from childhood to young adulthood. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2017;28:399–406. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3742-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Akbar M, et al. Fractures in myelomeningocele. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology: official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2010;11:175–182. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0102-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Erdem Y, Akpancar S, Gemci MH. Bilateral Femoral Fracture in a newborn with Myelomeningocele at Cesarean section: A Case Report. Journal of orthopaedic case reports. 2016;6:80–81. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.D’Andrea L, Catena N. Femural shaft fracture in a newborn infant treated with axial external fixator: a case report. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2008;28:17–19. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815b4dea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ralis, Z. A., Ralis, H. M., Randall, M., Watkins, G. & Blake, P. D. Changes in shape, ossification and quality of bones in children with spina bifida. Developmental medicine and child neurology. Supplement, 29–41 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Morris JK, et al. Prevention of neural tube defects in the UK: a missed opportunity. Archives of disease in childhood. 2016;101:604–607. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene ND. Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. The Lancet. Neurology. 2013;12:799–810. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70110-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harris MJ, Juriloff DM. Mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and their role in understanding human neural tube defects. Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2007;79:187–210. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Harris MJ, Juriloff DM. An update to the list of mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and advances toward a complete genetic perspective of neural tube closure. Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2010;88:653–669. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Anderson MJ, Schimmang T, Lewandoski M. An FGF3-BMP Signaling Axis Regulates Caudal Neural Tube Closure, Neural Crest Specification and Anterior-Posterior Axis Extension. PLoS genetics. 2016;12:e1006018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Galea GL, et al. Planar cell polarity aligns osteoblast division in response to substrate strain. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2015;30:423–435. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nikolopoulou E, Galea GL, Rolo A, Greene ND, Copp AJ. Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms. Development. 2017;144:552–566. doi: 10.1242/dev.145904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ybot-Gonzalez P, et al. Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure. Development. 2007;134:789–799. doi: 10.1242/dev.000380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang B, Sinha T, Jiao K, Serra R, Wang J. Disruption of PCP signaling causes limb morphogenesis and skeletal defects and may underlie Robinow syndrome and brachydactyly type B. Human molecular genetics. 2011;20:271–285. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Andre P, et al. The Wnt coreceptor Ryk regulates Wnt/planar cell polarity by modulating the degradation of the core planar cell polarity component Vangl2. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287:44518–44525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.414441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keller KC, et al. Wnt5a Supports Osteogenic Lineage Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem cells and development. 2016;25:1020–1032. doi: 10.1089/scd.2015.0367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Uehara, S. et al. Protein kinase N3 promotes bone resorption by osteoclasts in response to Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling. Science signaling10, 10.1126/scisignal.aan0023 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Galea GL, et al. Quantification of Alterations in Cortical Bone Geometry Using Site Specificity Software in Mouse models of Aging and the Responses to Ovariectomy and Altered Loading. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2015;6:52. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Merte, J. et al. Sec. 24b selectively sorts Vangl2 to regulate planar cell polarity during neural tube closure. Nature cell biology12, 41–46, sup pp 41–48, 10.1038/ncb2002 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Murdoch JN, et al. Genetic interactions between planar cell polarity genes cause diverse neural tube defects in mice. Disease models & mechanisms. 2014;7:1153–1163. doi: 10.1242/dmm.016758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martin LJ, et al. Effect of arsenite, maternal age, and embryonic sex on spina bifida, exencephaly, and resorption rates in the splotch mouse. Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2003;67:231–239. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Elms P, Siggers P, Napper D, Greenfield A, Arkell R. Zic2 is required for neural crest formation and hindbrain patterning during mouse development. Developmental biology. 2003;264:391–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ayturk UM, et al. An RNA-seq protocol to identify mRNA expression changes in mouse diaphyseal bone: applications in mice with bone property altering Lrp5 mutations. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2013;28:2081–2093. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang T, Bassuk AG, Fritzsch B. Prickle1 stunts limb growth through alteration of cell polarity and gene expression. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2013;242:1293–1306. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu R, et al. c-Jun N-Terminal Kinases (JNKs) Are Critical Mediators of Osteoblast Activity In Vivo. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2017;32:1811–1815. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davey CF, Moens CB. Planar cell polarity in moving cells: think globally, act locally. Development. 2017;144:187–200. doi: 10.1242/dev.122804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Findlay AS, et al. The core planar cell polarity gene, Vangl2, directs adult corneal epithelial cell alignment and migration. Royal Society open science. 2016;3:160658. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dohn MR, Mundell NA, Sawyer LM, Dunlap JA, Jessen JR. Planar cell polarity proteins differentially regulate extracellular matrix organization and assembly during zebrafish gastrulation. Developmental biology. 2013;383:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen CH, He CW, Liao CP, Pan CL. A Wnt-planar polarity pathway instructs neurite branching by restricting F-actin assembly through endosomal signaling. PLoS genetics. 2017;13:e1006720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Babayeva S, Zilber Y, Torban E. Planar cell polarity pathway regulates actin rearrangement, cell shape, motility, and nephrin distribution in podocytes. American journal of physiology. Renal physiology. 2011;300:F549–560. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00566.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang W, et al. Wnt-induced Vangl2 phosphorylation is dose-dependently required for planar cell polarity in mammalian development. Cell Res. 2017;27:1466–1484. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yin H, Copley CO, Goodrich LV, Deans MR. Comparison of phenotypes between different vangl2 mutants demonstrates dominant effects of the Looptail mutation during hair cell development. PloS one. 2012;7:e31988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yates LL, et al. The PCP genes Celsr1 and Vangl2 are required for normal lung branching morphogenesis. Human molecular genetics. 2010;19:2251–2267. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yates LL, et al. The planar cell polarity gene Vangl2 is required for mammalian kidney-branching morphogenesis and glomerular maturation. Human molecular genetics. 2010;19:4663–4676. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dodge T, et al. Mechanical loading, damping, and load-driven bone formation in mouse tibiae. Bone. 2012;51:810–818. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yadav, P., Shefelbine, S. J., Ponten, E. & Gutierrez-Farewik, E. M. Influence of muscle groups’ activation on proximal femoral growth tendency. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 10.1007/s10237-017-0925-3 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Lei Y, et al. Identification of novel CELSR1 mutations in spina bifida. PloS one. 2014;9:e92207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kibar Z, et al. Contribution of VANGL2 mutations to isolated neural tube defects. Clinical genetics. 2011;80:76–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01515.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Juriloff DM, Harris MJ. A consideration of the evidence that genetic defects in planar cell polarity contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects. Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2012;94:824–840. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cetera, M., Leybova, L., Woo, F. W., Deans, M. & Devenport, D. Planar cell polarity-dependent and independent functions in the emergence of tissue-scale hair follicle patterns. Developmental biology, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.06.003 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Nowlan NC, et al. Developing bones are differentially affected by compromised skeletal muscle formation. Bone. 2010;46:1275–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Epstein DJ, Vekemans M, Gros P. Splotch (Sp2H), a mutation affecting development of the mouse neural tube, shows a deletion within the paired homeodomain of Pax-3. Cell. 1991;67:767–774. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Klootwijk R, et al. Genetic variants in ZIC1, ZIC2, and ZIC3 are not major risk factors for neural tube defects in humans. American journal of medical genetics. Part A. 2004;124A:40–47. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brown SA, et al. Holoprosencephaly due to mutations in ZIC2, a homologue of Drosophila odd-paired. Nature genetics. 1998;20:180–183. doi: 10.1038/2484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ybot-Gonzalez P, et al. Neural plate morphogenesis during mouse neurulation is regulated by antagonism of Bmp signalling. Development. 2007;134:3203–3211. doi: 10.1242/dev.008177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li GH, Deng HW, Kung AW, Huang QY. Identification of genes for bone mineral density variation by computational disease gene identification strategy. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2011;29:709–716. doi: 10.1007/s00774-011-0271-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kalogeropoulos M, et al. Zic1 transcription factor in bone: neural developmental protein regulates mechanotransduction in osteocytes. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2010;24:2893–2903. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-148908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alman BA. The role of hedgehog signalling in skeletal health and disease. Nature reviews. Rheumatology. 2015;11:552–560. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Koyabu Y, Nakata K, Mizugishi K, Aruga J, Mikoshiba K. Physical and functional interactions between Zic and Gli proteins. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:6889–6892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000773200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Huang, S. & Jin, A. ZIC2 promotes viability and invasion of human osteosarcoma cells by suppressing SHIP2 expression and activating PI3K/AKT pathways. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 10.1002/jcb.26387 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Hartmann C. A Wnt canon orchestrating osteoblastogenesis. Trends in cell biology. 2006;16:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Galea GL, Lanyon LE, Price JS. Sclerostin’s role in bone’s adaptive response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2017;96:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Canalis E. Wnt signalling in osteoporosis: mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches. Nature reviews. Endocrinology. 2013;9:575–583. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Joeng KS, Schumacher CA, Zylstra-Diegel CR, Long F, Williams BO. Lrp5 and Lrp6 redundantly control skeletal development in the mouse embryo. Developmental biology. 2011;359:222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Winkler DG, et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. The EMBO journal. 2003;22:6267–6276. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li S, et al. Rack1 is required for Vangl2 membrane localization and planar cell polarity signaling while attenuating canonical Wnt activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:2264–2269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013170108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ross ME, Mason CE, Finnell RH. Genomic approaches to the assessment of human spina bifida risk. Birth defects research. 2017;109:120–128. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Copp AJ, Checiu I, Henson JN. Developmental basis of severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail (Lp) mutant mouse: use of microsatellite DNA markers to identify embryonic genotype. Developmental biology. 1994;165:20–29. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Conway SJ, Henderson DJ, Copp AJ. Pax3 is required for cardiac neural crest migration in the mouse: evidence from the splotch (Sp2H) mutant. Development. 1997;124:505–514. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.2.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3448–3449. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Galea GL, et al. Old age and the associated impairment of bones’ adaptation to loading are associated with transcriptomic changes in cellular metabolism, cell-matrix interactions and the cell cycle. Gene. 2017;599:36–52. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Szklarczyk D, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic acids research. 2017;45:D362–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Orriss IR, Taylor SE, Arnett TR. Rat osteoblast cultures. Methods in molecular biology. 2012;816:31–41. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Taylor SE, Shah M, Orriss IR. Generation of rodent and human osteoblasts. BoneKEy reports. 2014;3:585. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Orriss IR, Arnett TR. Rodent osteoclast cultures. Methods in molecular biology. 2012;816:103–117. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.