TO THE EDITOR
Taxanes are frequently associated with nail and periungual tissue afflictions such as paronychia, onychodystrophy, onycholysis, subungual hemorrhages, and pyogenic granulomas.1 These therapy-associated nail abnormalities can cause physical symptoms and psychosocial distress, leading to impairments in patients’ quality of life (QoL). The changes in QoL may impact the number of therapy cycles that a patient can tolerate, and in some cases, they may lead to discontinuation of anti-cancer therapy.2
We conducted a retrospective chart review (8/2012–6/2015) of paclitaxel and docetaxel-treated patients referred to a dermatologist (M.E.L.). Of 114 patients, a majority were women with breast cancer, and had developed paclitaxel-associated acute paronychia (Table I). The clinical severity of the nail infections and changes was mostly grade 2, consistent with moderate severity adverse events (AEs) requiring local, noninvasive interventions (CTCAE v4.03; Table I). We did not identify nail abnormalities with grade 3 or 4, suggesting that medically significant AEs may require prompt interruption of anticancer therapy and are therefore less likely to be seen in the outpatient setting.
Table I.
Characteristics of patients with taxane-associated nail infections and nail changes.
| A. Descriptive summary of demographic characteristics of the study sample (n=114). | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Feature | No. | (%) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 11 | (9.6) | ||
| Female | 103 | (90.4) | ||
| Mean age | 55.2 | |||
| Cancer type or site | ||||
| Breast | 84 | (73.7) | ||
| Lung | 10 | (8.8) | ||
| Gastrointestinal | 10 | (8.8) | ||
| Gynecologic | 7 | (6.1) | ||
| Other | 3 | (2.6) | ||
| Cancer treatment | ||||
| Paclitaxel | 95 | (83.3) | ||
| Docetaxel | 15 | (13.2) | ||
| Paclitaxel and docetaxel | 4 | (3.5) | ||
|
| ||||
| B. Clinical severity grading of taxane-associated nail infections and nail changes. | ||||
|
| ||||
| Nail infection | Nail changes | |||
| No. | (%) | No. | (%) | |
|
| ||||
| Grading noted | ||||
| Grade 1 | 9 | (11.7) | 24 | (26.1) |
| Grade 2 | 68 | (88.3) | 68 | (73.9) |
| Grade 3 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) |
| Grade 4 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) |
| Grading not noted | 4 | 5 | ||
|
| ||||
| C. Treatment instituted for taxane-associated nail infections and nail changes. | ||||
|
| ||||
| Feature | No. | (%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Antimicrobial therapy (n=114) | ||||
| Topical agents alone | 37 | (32.5) | ||
| Oral agents alone | 0 | (0.0) | ||
| Topical and oral combinations | 77 | (67.5) | ||
| Nail symptoms improved (n=82) | ||||
| Yes | 66 | (80.5) | ||
| No | 16 | (19.5) | ||
| No dermatology follow-up | 32 | |||
Topical agents included ciclopirox, bacitracin-polymyxin b, iodine, and others. Oral agents included cefadroxil, ciprofloxacin, and TMP-SMX, and others.
Microbiological cultures grew 21 distinct bacterial and fungal species (Figure 1). The most commonly isolated organism, Staphylococcus aureus, is a part of resident skin flora. In cancer patients however, it is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate.4 Nearly half of the isolates in these patients were opportunistic and/or pathogenic (non-skin flora) organisms. This is reflective of the combined role of impaired resistance to colonization because of taxane therapy and exposure to healthcare environments where the acquisition of these organisms is more likely. In general, direct cytotoxic, antiangiogenic, or neurotropic effects of taxanes in the nail matrix appear to be the inciting factors, with a positive correlation to the number of treatment cycles (cumulative dose). In the setting of an impaired physical barrier due to the antimitotic effect of taxanes in the nail matrix, and suppression of the innate and adaptive immune responses related to systemic cytotoxic anticancer therapies, we hypothesize that these infectious agents may be responsible for nail abnormalities in some patients.
Figure 1.
Gram-positive bacteria (red bars), Gram-negative bacteria (gray bars), and fungi (blue bars) isolated from affected tissues in patients with taxane-associated nail infections and changes.
In 46 patients (40.4%), the culture sensitivity results necessitated treatment modifications. The most prescribed oral antibiotics were cefadroxil, ciprofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The most prescribed topical antimicrobials were ciclopirox, bacitracin-polymyxin b, and iodine. At follow-up, 80.5% of patients reported clinical improvement in their condition (Table I).
In the cancer patient population, we recommend routinely collecting bacterial and fungal culture swabs from affected periungual tissues. We propose empiric oral antibiotic treatment with fluoroquinolones or first- or second-generation cephalosporins in conjunction with topical antimicrobials. In the author’s (M.E.L.) experience, extended therapy (4–6 weeks) is often required, perhaps due to poor penetration of antibiotics into affected tissues and risk of treatment failure with shorter courses (≤ 2 weeks). Of note, nail infections and other nail changes are likely to recur if taxane therapy is ongoing. Instituting frozen gel sock and/or glove therapy for fifteen minutes before, sixty minutes during, and fifteen minutes after taxane infusion reduces the incidence of nail pathology.5 Patients will need routine supportive oncodermatology monitoring.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Kathryn Ciccolini, RN and Daphne Leon for assisting with the ePathbook database in the Dermatology Service, MSKCC.
Funding/Support: CAV was supported by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Diversity Mentorship Program and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Training Grant T32-GM007198. This study was partially supported by the NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA008748. VRB and MEL are supported by the RJR Oncodermatology Fund at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Abbreviations
- QoL
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest disclosures: None reported.
Statement on prior presentations: The contents of this manuscript have not been previously published and are not currently submitted elsewhere.
IRB Review: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Financial Disclosure: CAV, VRB, and MK have no relevant financial affiliations. SBG receives research funding from Berg Health and HealthTell, and she is an advisory board member and consultant for Sermonix Pharmaceuticals. VSB is a consultant for Anthem Foundation, Pfizer, and US Business Leadership Network. AG receives research funding from Innocrin Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer. MEL reports that he is serving as a consultant to Quintiles, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Foamix, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen R&D, Novartis, and AstraZeneca pharmaceuticals. He has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Berg.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Sibaud V, Lebœuf NR, Roche H, et al. Dermatological adverse events with taxane chemotherapy. Eur J Dermatol. 2016;26(5):427–443. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Winther D, Saunte DM, Knap M, et al. Nail changes due to docetaxel--a neglected side effect and nuisance for the patient. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(10):1191–1197. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen AP, Setser A, Anadkat MJ, et al. Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(5):1025–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gopal AK, Fowler VG, Jr, Shah M, et al. Prospective analysis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in nonneutropenic adults with malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(5):1110–1115. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.5.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scotté F, Banu E, Medioni J, et al. Matched case-control phase 2 study to evaluate the use of a frozen sock to prevent docetaxel-induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the foot. Cancer. 2008;112(7):1625–31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

