Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2013 Mar 21;31(19):2348–2357. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.011

Hepatitis A vaccination coverage among adults 18–49 years traveling to a country of high or intermediate endemicity, United States

Peng-jun Lu a,*, Kathy K Byrd b, Trudy V Murphy b
PMCID: PMC5822445  NIHMSID: NIHMS942846  PMID: 23523408

Abstract

Background

Since 1996, hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) has been recommended for adults at increased risk for infection including travelers to high or intermediate hepatitis A endemic countries. In 2009, travel outside the United States and Canada was the most common exposure nationally reported for persons with hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection.

Objective

To assess HepA vaccination coverage among adults 18–49 years traveling to a country of high or intermediate endemicity in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), to determine self-reported HepA vaccination coverage (≥1 dose) and series completion (≥2 dose) among persons 18–49 years who traveled, since 1995, to a country of high or intermediate HAV endemicity. Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal analyses were conducted to identify factors independently associated with HepA vaccine receipt.

Results

In 2010, approximately 36.6% of adults 18–49 years reported traveling to high or intermediate hepatitis A endemic countries; among this group unadjusted HepA vaccination coverage was 26.6% compared to 12.7% among non-travelers (P-values < 0.001) and series completion were 16.9% and 7.6%, respectively (P-values < 0.001). On multivariable analysis among all respondents, travel status was an independent predictor of HepA coverage and series completion (both P-values < 0.001). Among travelers, HepA coverage and series completion (≥2 doses) were higher for travelers 18–25 years (prevalence ratios 2.3, 2.8, respectively, P-values < 0.001) and for travelers 26–39 years (prevalence ratios 1.5, 1.5, respectively, P-value < 0.001, P-value = 0.002, respectively) compared to travelers 40–49 years. Other characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of HepA receipt among travelers included Asian race/ethnicity, male sex, never having been married, having a high school or higher education, living in the western United States, having greater number of physician contacts or receipt of influenza vaccination in the previous year. HepB vaccination was excluded from the model because of the significant correlation between receipt of HepA vaccination and HepB vaccination could distort the model.

Conclusions

Although travel to a country of high or intermediate hepatitis A endemicity was associated with higher likelihood of HepA vaccination in 2010 among adults 18–49 years, self-reported HepA vaccination coverage was low among adult travelers to these areas. Healthcare providers should ask their patients’ upcoming travel plans and recommend and offer travel related vaccinations to their patients.

Keywords: Hepatitis A, Hepatitis A vaccine, Vaccination, Coverage, Adults at risk, Travel status

1. Introduction

Hepatitis A is caused by infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV). HAV infection is transmitted primarily through the fecal–oral route by either person-to-person contact or ingestion of contaminated food or water [17]. HAV is endemic in many parts of the developing world, where poor sanitation facilitates transmission of the virus [1]. In areas where HAV infection is endemic, transmission occurs most frequently among close contacts, particularly within households and among extended family settings. In the developed world, the incidence of hepatitis A disease is generally low; cases occur in the context of community-wide outbreaks transmitted among preschool and school-age children to their adult contacts, or in foodborne outbreaks [26]. Cases also occur among injection drug users and men who have sex with men. In countries with childhood hepatitis A (HepA) vaccination programs, an increasing proportion of cases occur among travelers returning from hepatitis A endemic areas [17].

HAV infection among adults results in substantial morbidity, medical costs and work loss. In 2007, approximately 35% of persons with acute HAV infection were hospitalized in the United States, most of whom were adults and the severity of diseases increased with age [2,3,6]. Adults with HAV infection lose an average of 16 work days for outpatients, and 33 days for hospitalized patients [8].

Persons from the United States who travel to developing countries are at substantial risk for HAV infection [5]. Such persons include tourists, military personnel, missionaries, foreign-born persons who return to their country of origin to visit friends or relatives, and others who work or study abroad in countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity [5]. Hepatitis A remains one of the more common vaccine-preventable diseases acquired during travel [9,10]. Among acute hepatitis A cases reported nationally for whom travel information was available in 2009, 15% involved travel outside the United States and Canada even though there were a large number of cases with missing or unknown exposure [6]. Similar proportions of travel related hepatitis A cases are reported in Europe [1,11,12]. One study estimated the risk of acquiring HAV infection among persons who were not vaccinated before departure to be four to 30 cases per 100,000 months of stay in developing countries [13]. In addition, persons who acquire HAV during travel can transmit the infection to susceptible persons upon their return [5].

Optimal use of vaccination can significantly reduce the hepatitis A disease burden [5]. In 1995, the first hepatitis A vaccine was available in the United States. In 1996, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended hepatitis A vaccination for travelers to or persons working in countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity [14]. Men who have sex with men (MSM), injection- and non-injection-drug users, persons who have occupational risk for infection, persons with chronic liver disease, and persons who have clotting-factor disorders were also recommended for vaccination [14]. In 2006, ACIP recommended that all children should receive hepatitis A vaccine at age 1 year (i.e., 12–23 months); children who are not vaccinated by age 2 years can be vaccinated at subsequent visits; states, counties, and communities with existing hepatitis A vaccination programs for children aged 2–18 years are encouraged to maintain these programs. In areas without existing hepatitis A vaccination programs, catch-up vaccination of unvaccinated children aged 2–18 years can be considered; and adult high-risk populations which HepA vaccination was recommendation in 1996 were also recommended to receive vaccination in the 2006 ACIP recommendation [5]. Previous studies showed that HepA vaccination coverage was 81.2% among children 19–35 months, 42.0% among adolescents, and 34% among MSM (high-risk adult population) [1517].

This study used data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to address and examine the following questions: [1] What is the most recent HepA vaccination coverage among adults 18–49 years who reported travel to a country of high or intermediate HAV endemicity? [2] What factors significantly affect HepA vaccination among adults 18–49 years who reported travel to a country of high or intermediate HAV endemicity?

2. Methods

We analyzed data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to determine self-reported hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) coverage (≥1 dose) and series completion (≥2 doses) among adult travelers, 18–49 years, to high or intermediate HAV endemic countries. The NHIS is an annual household survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [18]. The NHIS provides estimates on health indicators, health care utilization and access, and health-related behaviors for the U.S. non-institutionalized, civilian population. The NHIS sample is selected through the use of complex sampling design involving stratification, clustering, and multistage sampling with a nonzero probability of selection for each person. Estimates were weighted to the adult civilian population of the United States. Face to face interviews were conducted each week throughout the year in a probability sample of households. Data collected over the period of a year form the basis for annual estimates of the health characteristics of the U.S. population and the analysis trends in these characteristics. In the sample adult core, one adult per sampled family was randomly selected and asked to complete the sample adult questionnaire. In 2010, the final response rate for the sample adult core was 60.8% [18].

HepA vaccination coverage was determined using the following sample adult core survey question: “The hepatitis A vaccine is given as a two dose series routinely to some children starting at 1 year of age, and to some adults and people who travel outside the United States. Although it can be given as a combination vaccine with hepatitis B, it is different from the hepatitis B shot, and has only been available since 1995. Have you ever received the hepatitis A vaccine?” An affirmative answer to the aforementioned question prompted a second question concerning how many doses respondents received: “How many hepatitis A shots did you receive?” Persons from developed countries who travel to developing countries (most of developing countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity) are at substantial risk for acquiring hepatitis A [2,5]. To determine travel status, respondents were asked “Have you ever traveled outside of the United States to countries other than Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand or Canada, since 1995?” For the purposes of this study we will refer to travelers to HAV endemic areas as “travelers”.

Vaccination coverage and series completion were stratified by the following demographic and other characteristics: travel status (traveled to a country of high or intermediate HAV endemicity, not traveled), age group [1825, 2629, 40–49], sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white only, non-Hispanic black only, Hispanic, Asian, and others (including American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and multiple race)), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated, never married), educational level (high school or less, above high school), employment status (employed, not employed), poverty level (at or above poverty, below poverty), region of residence (Northwest, Midwest, South, West), U.S. born status (born in the US, not born in the US), number of physician contacts in the previous year (none, 1, 2–3, 4–9, ≥10), hospitalization in the past year (yes, no), place of routine health care (clinic or health center, doctor’s office or health maintenance organization (HMO)), health insurance status (yes, no), ever lived with hepatitis patients (yes, no), ever had chronic liver diseases (yes, no), HepB vaccination (yes, no), influenza vaccination in the past year (yes, no), and behavioral risk level for hepatitis B infection (high risk or non-high risk). Since persons from developed countries who travel to developing countries (most of developing countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity) are at substantial risk for acquiring hepatitis A [2,5], we considered persons who traveled outside the United States to countries other than Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada as having traveled to countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity. Behavioral risks for HBV infection were included in the analysis because it includes persons who are indicated for HepA vaccination (MSM, IDU), with the caveat that it also includes others with behavioral risk for HIV and HepB which are not indications for HepA vaccination. Individuals with behavioral risks for HBV infection were defined as persons who considered themselves at high risk for HIV infection, or reported having a sexually transmitted disease other than HIV/AIDS during the previous five [5] years, or reported any one of the following risk factors: male sex with men, injection of street drugs, ever traded sex for money or drugs, HIV positive, ever had sex with someone with any of the aforementioned risk factors, and hemophilia with receipt of clotting factor concentrates. Non-high risk individuals were defined as persons without any of the aforementioned risk factors. All variables listed above in the bi-variable analysis were also included multivariable model except for HepB vaccination because of the significant correlation between receipt of HepA vaccination and HepB vaccination could distort the model.

We used SUDAAN statistical software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) to calculate point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of vaccine coverage and series completion [19]. All analyses were weighted to reflect the age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the U.S. non-institutionalized, civilian population. Bi-variable analysis was conducted using a chi-square to test population distributions between travelers and non-travelers. We used chi-square tests to test the difference in vaccination coverage and series completion by travel status and within each demographic and other characteristic category. Logistic regression was used to determine adjusted vaccination coverage and series completion rates (i.e., the predictive margins) among travelers only. Predictive margins are a type of direct standardization that averages the predicted values from the logistic model, controlling for potential confounders [20,21]. A separate logistic regression model was conducted among all persons 18–49 years including travel status as an independent variable to determine if travel status was an independent predictor of vaccination.

3. Results

The 2010 NHIS surveyed 14,755 adults 18–49 years; 5,561 (36.6%) reported traveling to a country of high or intermediate HAV endemicity. The overall population was largely non-Hispanic white (62.8%), insured (75.0%), employed (72.2%), had greater than a high school education (61.7%) and lived at or above the federal poverty line (83.1%). Distribution of travelers and non-travelers differed by employment status, poverty level, health insurance, and U.S. born status (Table 1). Distribution of travelers and non-travelers also differed by most other socio-demographic and access to care characteristics (Table 1). Overall, 29.7% travelers 18–49 years were not born in the United States (Table 1), and 26.9% of those were Asian (data not shown).

Table 1.

Sample characteristics of participants 18–49 years in the United States, by travel status, demographic and access-to-care variables – NHIS 2010.

Characteristic All adults
Traveleda
Not traveled
Sample Weighted % Sample Weighted % Sample Weighted %
Total 14,755 5561 36.6 13,949 93.0
Age
18–25 3239 25.2 1107 21.6 969 27.4b
26–39 6783 42.4 2770 46.8 1941 39.8
40–49 4733 32.4 1684 31.6 2246 32.8
Sex
Male 6379 49.8 2756 52.9 3983 48.0b
Female 8016 50.2 2805 47.1 5211 52.0
Race/ethnicity
Non-hispanic White 7405 62.3 2663 59.3 4742 64.0b
Non-hispanic Black 2395 12.8 506 7.6 1889 15.7
Hispanic 3597 17.8 1580 21.9 2017 15.5
Asian 1045 5.2 715 9.7 330 2.6
Other 313 1.9 97 1.5 216 2.2
Marital status
Married 6289 49.0 2788 57.0 3501 44.4b
Widowed/divorced/separated 1975 9.0 589 6.8 1386 10.2
Never married 6469 42.0 2180 36.2 4289 45.4
Education
High school or less 5812 38.3 1488 25.9 4324 45.5b
Above high school 8901 61.7 4067 74.1 4834 54.5
Employment status
Employed 10,515 72.2 4223 76.8 6292 69.5b
Not employed 4233 27.8 1335 23.2 2898 30.5
Poverty level
At or above poverty 10,562 83.1 4373 88.6 6189 79.9b
Below poverty 2997 16.9 797 11.4 2200 20.1
Region
Northeast 2161 16.5 824 16.9 1337 16.3b
Midwest 3197 23.2 1043 20.5 2154 24.7
South 5427 35.5 1862 31.7 3565 37.7
West 3970 24.8 1832 30.9 2138 21.3
US born
Yes 11,048 80.5 3546 70.3 7502 86.3b
No 3701 19.5 2013 29.7 1688 13.7
Physician contacts within past year
None 3976 26.0 1307 22.1 2669 28.2b
1 2652 18.1 1011 18.2 1641 18.0
2–3 3696 25.5 1517 28.1 2179 24.0
4–9 2828 19.7 1146 21.5 1682 18.7
≥10 1576 10.7 571 10.1 1005 11.1
Hospitalization within past year
Yes 1093 7.1 348 5.9 745 7.8b
No 13,658 92.9 5211 94.1 8447 92.2
Place of routine health care
Clinic or health center 3264 19.7 1134 18.5 2130 20.4b
Doctor’s office or HMOc 8128 59.4 3239 62.6 4889 57.6
Some other place 563 3.4 167 2.6 396 3.8
None 2685 17.5 987 16.3 1698 18.2
Health insurance
Yes 10,765 75.0 4343 80.2 6422 72.0b
No 3941 25.0 1201 19.8 2740 28.0
High-risk behavior with HepB indicationd
Yes 1161 7.1 389 6.3 772 7.6b
No 13,517 92.9 5145 93.7 8372 92.4
Ever lived with a hepatitis patients
Yes 552 4.0 231 4.5 321 3.7
No 13,843 96.0 5164 95.5 8679 96.3
Persons with chronic liver diseases
Yes 120 0.7 43 0.7 77 0.7
No 14,622 99.3 5516 99.3 9106 99.3
Influenza vaccination
Yes 2096 24.5 882 28.2 1214 22.4b
No 6818 75.5 2445 71.8 4373 77.6
Ever received hepatitis B vaccination
Yes 5645 41.7 2447 48.4 3198 37.9b
No 8134 58.3 2706 51.6 5428 62.1
a

Persons from developed countries who travel to developing countries (most of developing countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity) are at substantial risk for acquiring hepatitis A. Persons traveled outside the United States to countries other than Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada were considered having traveled to countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity.

b

Significant difference between travelers and non travelers (by chi-square test, P < 0.05).

c

Health maintenance organization.

d

Includes persons who considered themselves at high risk for HIV infection, persons who reported having a sexually transmitted disease other than HIV/AIDS during the previous 5 years, and persons who reported any one of the following risk factors: hemophilia with receipt of clotting factor concentrates, men who have sex with men, injecting street drugs, trading sex for money or drugs, testing positive for HIV, or having sex with someone with any of these risk factors.

3.1. Bivariate analysis of HepA coverage (≥1 dose) and series completion (≥2 doses)

HepA coverage (≥1 dose) is shown in Table 2. Overall, 26.6% (95% CI = 24.9–28.3%) of adult travelers received ≥1 dose of vaccine compared with 12.7% (95% CI = 11.7–13.7%) among non-travelers (P-value < 0.001). Series completion (≥2 doses) was also higher among travelers at 16.9% (95% CI = 15.4–18.4%) compared with 7.6% (95% CI = 6.8–8.4%) among non-travelers (P-value < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Percentage of persons 18–49 years who reported receiving hepatitis A vaccination, United States, by travel status, demographic and access-to-care variables – NHIS 2010.

Characteristic Vaccination coverage with ≥1 dose among persons 18–49 years traveleda
%(95% CI)
Vaccination coverage with ≥1 dose among persons 18–49 years not traveled
%(95% CI)
P-valueb Vaccination coverage with ≥2 dose among persons 18–49 years traveleda
%(95% CI)
Vaccination coverage with ≥2 dose among persons 18–49 years not traveled
%(95% CI)
P-valueb
Total 26.6 (24.9–28.3) 12.7 (11.7–13.7) <0.001 16.9 (15.4–18.4)   7.6 (6.8–8.4) <0.001
Age
18–25 37.5 (33.3–41.9)c 20.5 (18.2–23.1)c <0.001 26.4 (22.5–30.8)c 12.5 (10.6–14.6)c <0.001
26–39 26.3 (24.3–28.3)c 12.2 (10.9–13.5)c <0.001 16.3 (14.6–18.1)c   7.4 (6.4–8.5)c <0.001
40–49d 20.0 (17.7–22.6)   7.1 (6.1–8.3) <0.001 11.9 (10.1–14.0)   4.2 (3.3–5.2) <0.001
Sex
Maled 26.5 (24.2–28.9) 11.4 (10.1–12.9) <0.001 16.7 (14.8–18.8)   6.8 (5.8–7.9) <0.001
Female 26.6 (24.3–29.2) 13.8 (12.6–15.1)c <0.001 17.0 (14.9–19.4)   8.3 (7.4–9.4)c <0.001
Race/ethnicity
Non-hispanic Whited 26.4 (24.1–28.9) 11.8 (10.5–13.1) <0.001 17.5 (15.5–19.7)   7.1 (6.2–8.2) <0.001
Non-hispanic Black 27.7 (23.2–32.7) 14.0 (12.3–15.9)c <0.001 16.4 (12.4–21.4)   8.6 (7.3–10.2) 0.001
Hispanic 22.5 (19.8–25.5)c 13.5 (11.5–15.8) <0.001 13.4 (11.1–16.0)c   8.1 (6.5–10.0) <0.001
Asian 33.2 (28.2–38.7)c 13.5 (9.8–18.4) <0.001 20.1 (15.9–25.0)   5.3 (3.1–9.0) <0.001
Other 42.9 (30.5–56.2)c 22.5 (15.7–31.2)c <0.001 25.6 (16.3–37.8) 13.6 (8.2–21.7) <0.001
Marital status
Married 23.7 (21.7–25.8)c 10.5 (9.2–11.9)c <0.001 14.3 (12.7–16.0)c   5.9 (4.9–7.0)c <0.001
Widowed/divorced/separated 19.9 (16.0–24.4) 10.9 (9.2–12.8)c 0.001 12.9 (9.4–17.4)   7.4 (6.0–9.1) 0.010
Never marriedd 32.5 (29.7–35.4) 15.3 (13.8–17.0) <0.001 22.0 (19.3–24.9)   9.4 (8.3–10.7) <0.001
Education
High school or lessd 19.3 (16.5–22.5)   9.9 (8.8–11.3) <0.001 10.6 (8.5–13.1)   5.5 (4.6–6.6) <0.001
Above high school 29.1 (27.1–31.1)c 15.0 (13.6–16.5)c <0.001 19.0 (17.3–21.0)c   9.4 (8.3–10.5)c <0.001
Employment status
Employedd 25.4 (23.6–27.3) 11.7 (10.6–12.8) <0.001 16.1 (14.5–17.7)   6.9 (6.1–7.9) <0.001
Not employed 30.6 (27.4–34.0)c 15.0 (13.3–16.9)c <0.001 19.7 (16.8–22.9)c   9.2 (7.9–10.6)c <0.001
Poverty level
At or above poverty 26.2 (24.5–28.1) 12.2 (11.1–13.4) <0.001 16.5 (15.0–18.2)   7.5 (6.7–8.5) <0.001
Below povertyd 29.1 (24.5–34.2) 13.5 (11.7–15.5) <0.001 20.2 (15.8–25.4)   7.9 (6.5–9.4) <0.001
Region
Northeastd 24.8 (20.6–29.4)   9.6 (7.5–12.2) <0.001 15.7 (12.2–19.9)   5.3 (3.8–7.4) <0.001
Midwest 25.2 (22.4–28.2) 10.2 (8.5–12.2) <0.001 17.4 (14.7–20.5)   5.8 (4.5–7.4) <0.001
South 25.5 (22.6–28.5) 13.2 (11.5–15.0)c <0.001 16.0 (13.5–18.9)   8.6 (7.3–10.1)c <0.001
West 29.7 (26.4–33.2) 17.2 (15.0–19.7)c <0.001 18.1 (15.4–21.2)   9.7 (8.1–11.6)c <0.001
US born
Yes 27.2 (25.2–29.4) 12.6 (11.5–13.7) <0.001 17.9 (16.1–19.8)c   7.7 (6.9–8.6) <0.001
Nod 25.0 (22.4–27.8) 13.3 (11.3–15.7) <0.001 14.3 (12.1–16.7)   6.6 (5.1–8.5) <0.001
Physician contacts within past year
Noned 21.2 (18.5–24.2) 10.1 (8.7–11.8) <0.001 12.8 (10.6–15.3)   5.8 (4.8–7.1) <0.001
1 25.2 (22.0–28.7) 11.6 (9.7–13.8) <0.001 17.4 (14.4–21.0)c   6.7 (5.3–8.3) <0.001
2–3 28.3 (25.4–31.4)c 13.6 (11.8–15.6)c <0.001 17.3 (14.8–20.1)c   8.4 (6.8–10.2)c <0.001
4–9 28.2 (24.8–31.8)c 15.5 (13.4–17.9)c <0.001 17.0 (14.4–20.0)c   8.9 (7.2–10.8)c <0.001
≥10 32.4 (27.8–37.5)c 14.4 (11.8–17.4)c <0.001 22.9 (18.9–27.5)c   9.9 (7.7–12.6)c <0.001
Hospitalization within past year
Yes 28.3 (22.9–34.5) 11.9 (9.5–14.7) <0.001 17.9 (12.9–24.4)   7.7 (5.7–10.3) 0.002
Nod 26.4 (24.7–28.2) 12.7 (11.7–13.8) <0.001 16.8 (15.3–18.4)   7.6 (6.8–8.4) <0.001
Place of routine health care
Clinic or health center 29.2 (25.8–32.9)c 14.1 (12.1–16.2)c <0.001 19.6 (16.5–23.2)c   8.3 (6.7–10.1)c <0.001
Doctor’s office or HMOe 26.5 (24.4–28.7) 13.0 (11.7–14.4)c <0.001 16.4 (14.6–18.3)   7.9 (6.9–9.0)c <0.001
Some other place 35.1 (26.7–44.5)c 16.8 (12.8–21.7)c <0.001 21.7 (15.4–29.7) 11.1 (8.1–15.0)c 0.009
Noned 21.6 (18.3–25.3)   9.5 (7.8–11.4) <0.001 14.3 (11.4–17.8)   5.5 (4.4–7.0) <0.001
Health insurance
Yes 27.7 (25.7–29.7)c 13.0 (11.9–14.1) <0.001 17.5 (15.9–19.2)   8.0 (7.1–8.9) <0.001
Nod 22.1 (18.9–25.5) 11.9 (10.4–13.5) <0.001 14.3 (11.6–17.6)   6.7 (5.5–8.0) <0.001
High-risk behavior with HepB indicationf
Yes 33.6 (27.5–40.3)c 19.4 (16.0–23.3)c <0.001 23.9 (18.5–30.2)c 10.4 (7.8–13.7)c <0.001
Nod 26.0 (24.3–27.8) 12.1 (11.1–13.2) <0.001 16.3 (14.9–17.9)   7.4 (6.7–8.2) <0.001
Ever lived with a hepatitis patients
Yes 24.9 (18.5–32.5) 23.3 (17.5–30.3)c 0.759 16.0 (10.7–23.2) 13.1 (8.9–18.8)c 0.746
Nod 26.5 (24.8–28.2) 12.1 (11.1–13.1) <0.001 16.8 (15.3–18.5)   7.3 (6.6–8.1) <0.001
Persons with chronic liver diseases
Yes 54.0 (36.6–70.5)c 17.3 (8.7–31.5) <0.001 39.2 (23.9–56.9)c 11.4 (4.3–26.7) 0.007
Nod 26.4 (24.7–28.1) 12.6 (11.7–13.7) <0.001 16.7 (15.3–18.3)   7.6 (6.8–8.4) <0.001
Influenza vaccination
Yes 32.2 (28.3–36.4)c 17.3 (14.6–20.4)c <0.001 22.1 (18.4–26.2)c 12.2 (9.9–15.0)c <0.001
Nod 24.7 (22.5–26.9) 10.7 (9.5–12.1) <0.001 14.4 (12.6–16.3)   6.0 (5.1–7.1) <0.001
Ever received hepatitis B vaccination
Yes 49.3 (46.6–52.0)c 31.4 (29.1–33.9)c <0.001 33.7 (31.0–36.5)c 20.2 (18.2–22.3)c <0.001
Nod   7.2 (6.0–8.6)   2.7 (2.2–3.3) <0.001   4.2 (3.3–5.4)   1.4 (1.0–1.9) <0.001
a

Persons from developed countries who travel to developing countries (most of developing countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity) are at substantial risk for acquiring hepatitis A. Persons traveled outside the United States to countries other than Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada were considered having traveled to countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity.

b

P < 0.05 for comparisons between travelers and non travelers within each level of each characteristic.

c

P < 0.05 for comparisons within each variable with the indicated reference level.

d

Reference level.

e

Health maintenance organization.

f

Includes persons who considered themselves at high risk for HIV infection, persons who reported having a sexually transmitted disease other than HIV/AIDS during the previous 5 years, and persons who reported any one of the following risk factors: hemophilia with receipt of clotting factor concentrates, men who have sex with men, injecting street drugs, trading sex for money or drugs, testing positive for HIV, or having sex with someone with any of these risk factors.

Among adult travelers, the following characteristics were associated with increased HepA coverage on bivariate analysis: younger age (persons 18–25 years had the highest coverage and those 40–49 years the lowest); being “Asian” or “other” race/ethnicity; never married; having above a high school education; unemployed; increasing number of physician contacts; place of routine healthcare being a clinic or doctor’s office or some other place; having medical insurance; having a high-risk behavior for hepatitis B infection; ever had chronic liver diseases; received influenza vaccination in the previous year; and ever having received hepatitis B vaccination. Similar associations were seen among non-travelers and for series completion for both travelers and non-travelers.

3.2. Multivariable analysis of HepA coverage and series completion among travelers

On multivariable analysis among all respondents with travel status as an independent variable, coverage (≥1 dose) and series completion (≥2 doses) were higher (prevalence ratios 2.1, 2.0, respectively, P-values < 0.001) among those who reported travel to a country with high or intermediate HAV endemicity compared to non-travelers (data not shown) On multivariable analysis among travelers, HepA coverage (≥1 doses) and series completion (≥2 doses) were higher for travelers 18–25 years (prevalence ratios 2.3, 2.8, respectively, P-values < 0.001), and for travelers 26–39 years (prevalence ratios 1.5, 1.5, respectively, P-value < 0.001, P-value = 0.002, respectively) compared to travelers 40–49 years. Other characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of HepA receipt among travelers included Asian race/ethnicity, male sex, never having been married, having a high school or higher education, living in the western United States, having greater number of physician contacts or receipt of influenza vaccination in the previous year (Table 3). Similar associations were seen for series completion, among travelers, with the exception that “other” race/ethnicity and sex were no longer statistically significant. Additionally, living in the western United States was also independently associated with a higher likelihood of HepA receipt in younger age group among travelers and non-travelers (data not shown).

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal prevalence of travelersa 18–49 years who reported received hepatitis A vaccination, United States, by demographic and access-to-care variables, NHIS 2010.

Characteristic Vaccination with ≥1 dose
Vaccination with ≥2 dose
Adjusted vaccination coverage
%(95% CI)
Prevalence ratio (risk ratio) (adjusted)
%(95% CI)
P-valueb Adjusted vaccination coverage
%(95% CI)
Prevalence Ratio (Risk Ratio) (adjusted)
%(95% CI)
P-valueb
Age
18–25 41.2 (35.2–47.3) 2.3 (1.8–2.9) <0.001 28.2 (22.4–34.0) 2.8 (2.1–3.8) <0.001
26–39 25.8 (23.3–28.4) 1.5 (1.2–1.8) <0.001 15.0 (12.9–17.2) 1.5 (1.2–2.0) 0.003
40–49c 17.8 (14.7–20.9) Referent 10.0 (7.6–12.3) Referent
Sex
Malec 29.0 (26.1–31.9) Referent 17.2 (14.6–19.9) Referent
Female 24.0 (21.1–27.0) 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 0.023 15.0 (12.4–17.6) 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.258
Race/ethnicity
Non-hispanic Whitec 24.3 (21.4–27.2) Referent 15.2 (12.7–17.7) Referent
Non-hispanic Black 30.3 (23.0–37.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.125 16.4 (10.4–22.4) 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 0.706
Hispanic 27.1 (22.2–32.0) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 0.365 17.2 (12.8–21.7) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.462
Asian 37.7 (29.3–46.0) 1.6 (1.2–2.0) 0.003 20.0 (13.6–26.5) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 0.174
Other 26.1 (13.0–39.1) 1.1 (0.6–1.8) 0.796 13.4 (1.9–24.9) 0.9 (0.4–2.2) 0.779
Marital Status
Married 24.8 (22.0–27.6) 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 0.573 14.0 (11.7–16.3) 0.7 (0.6–1.0) 0.712
Widowed/divorced/separated 22.9 (16.9–28.9) 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.062 15.1 (9.5–20.7) 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 0.023
Never marriedc 29.5 (25.7–33.2) Referent 19.0 (15.6–22.5) Referent
Education
High school or lessc 22.5 (18.0–26.9) Referent 12.2 (8.9–15.5) Referent
Above high school 27.8 (25.4–30.2) 1.2 (1.0–1.6) 0.050 17.4 (15.1–19.6) 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0.024
Employment status
Employedc 25.8 (23.5–28.0) Referent 0.187 15.8 (13.6–17.9) 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 0.560
Not employed 28.9 (24.7–33.1) 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 17.0 (13.4–20.7) Referent
Poverty level
At or above poverty 26.8 (24.7–29.0) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 0.273 16.2 (14.3–18.1) 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.559
Below povertyc 23.3 (17.6–29.0) Referent 14.5 (9.3–19.8) Referent
Region
Northeastc 22.4 (17.2–27.6) Referent 13.9 (9.7–18.2) Referent
Midwest 27.5 (23.5–31.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.131 17.6 (13.8–21.4) 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 0.222
South 25.4 (22.0–28.7) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) 0.347 16.2 (13.1–19.3) 1.2 (0.8–1.7) 0.392
West 29.3 (25.6–33.0) 1.3 (1.0–1.7) 0.040 16.0 (12.8–19.1) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.455
US born
Yes 26.5 (24.0–29.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.944 15.9 (13.8–18.0) 1.1 (0.7–1.3) 0.811
Noc 26.3 (21.8–30.8) Referent 16.5 (12.3–20.7) Referent
Physician contacts within past year
Nonec 21.2 (17.4–25.0) Referent 12.3 (9.1–15.5) Referent
1 24.4 (19.8–28.9) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) 0.289 16.1 (12.0–20.3) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 0.132
2–3 25.2 (21.5–28.9) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 0.137 14.2 (11.1–17.3) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.417
4–9 30.0 (25.7–34.4) 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 0.004 17.7 (14.0–21.4) 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0.032
≥10 35.9 (29.0–42.8) 1.7 (1.3–2.2) <0.001 24.1 (18.1–30.0) 2.0 (1.4–2.8) <0.001
Hospitalization within past year
Yes 23.5 (16.2–30.7) 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 0.418 13.7 (7.8–19.5) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.441
Noc 26.7 (24.6–28.8) Referent 16.3 (14.4–18.1) Referent
Place of routine health care
Clinic or health center 26.4 (22.3–30.6) 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 0.803 17.3 (13.4–21.2) 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.932
Doctor’s office or HMOd 26.4 (23.9–28.9) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.796 15.4 (13.1–17.6) 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.575
Some other place 34.2 (22.2–46.2) 1.3 (0.9–2.0) 0.172 19.3 (12.3–26.3) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 0.589
Nonec 25.5 (19.6–31.5) Referent 17.0 (11.6–22.5) Referent
Health insurance
Yes 27.2 (24.9–29.6) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 0.179 16.6 (14.5–18.6) 1.2 (0.8–1.7) 0.300
Noc 23.0 (17.8–28.1) Referent 13.8 (9.3–18.2) Referent
High-risk behavior with HepB indicatione
Yes 32.4 (24.2–40.6) 1.2 (1.0–1.6) 0.122 22.1 (14.7–29.5) 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0.060
Noc 26.1 (24.0–28.1) Referent 15.6 (13.8–17.4) Referent
Ever lived with a hepatitis patients
Yes 26.3 (17.8–34.8) 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.976 16.0 (8.0–23.9) 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 0.980
Noc 26.5 (24.4–28.5) Referent 16.1 (14.3–17.9) Referent
Persons with chronic liver diseases
Yes 47.1 (17.5–76.7) 1.8 (1.0–3.4) 0.135 24.4 (−4.3–53.0) 1.5 (0.5–4.9) 0.512
Noc 26.4 (24.3–28.4) Referent 16.0 (14.2–17.8) Referent
Influenza vaccination
Yes 31.1 (27.2–35.1) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 0.004 21.6 (17.7–25.4) 1.6 (1.3–2.0) <0.001
Noc 24.6 (22.3–26.9) Referent 13.8 (11.9–15.8) Referent
a

Persons from developed countries who travel to developing countries (most of developing countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity) are at substantial risk for acquiring hepatitis A. Persons traveled outside the United States to countries other than Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, or Canada were considered having traveled to countries with high or intermediate HAV endemicity.

b

P < 0.05 for comparisons within each variable with the indicated reference level.

c

Reference level.

d

Health maintenance organization.

e

Includes persons who considered themselves at high risk for HIV infection, persons who reported having a sexually transmitted disease other than HIV/AIDS during the previous 5 years, and persons who reported any one of the following risk factors: hemophilia with receipt of clotting factor concentrates, men who have sex with men, injecting street drugs, trading sex for money or drugs, testing positive for HIV, or having sex with someone with any of these risk factors.

4. Discussion

This study used a representative national survey to assess self-reported HepA vaccination coverage among adult travelers to countries of high or intermediate hepatitis A endemicity in 2010. Travel status was an independent predictor of vaccination HepA coverage (≥1 dose); however, series completion (≥2 doses) among adult travelers and non-travelers 18–49 years was low. Coverage was higher among younger travelers and travelers who are Asians. In addition, male sex, never having been married, having a high school or higher education, living in the western United States, having greater number of physician contacts or receipt of influenza vaccination in the previous year were independently associated with a higher likelihood of HepA vaccination among travelers.

There are several factors that might contribute to low HepA vaccination among travelers to HAV endemic countries. Many travelers to nearby international destinations may fail to seek travel health advice [13] because of lack of awareness of the risk for travel associated infection [22] and travel related vaccination recommendations. Some travelers, such as business travelers, journalists and relief workers may be notified of travel on short notice and have little time for vaccination prior to departure even though these travelers should be vaccinated for planned travel to protect themselves and minimize business costs and liability [23]. Travelers’ may believe that travel of short duration, to resorts or on tours, will pose little risk of travel related diseases [22]. This belief may also be likely for travelers visiting friends and relatives in endemic areas. Low HepA vaccination is a public health issue for non-travelers as well (e.g., MSM) in addition to international travelers [5,17,2426]. Additional factors that may contribute to low vaccination coverage include: the historical lack of national programs that support vaccine purchase and infrastructure for adult vaccine administration and limited private and public sector reimbursement for adult vaccination [5,17,2426].

Age was strongly associated with reported HepA vaccination among travelers. Our study indicated that persons 18–25 and 26–39 years were approximately two to three times more likely to report receiving HepA than those 40–49 years after controlling for other demographic and access to care variables. Higher vaccination coverage among younger adults may be due to one or more factors. First, the incidence of hepatitis A is higher among younger adults compared to older adults; higher coverage may reflect a targeted effort by health care providers to immunize persons perceived to have greater risk [6,7]. Higher vaccination coverage among younger adults 18–25 years may also reflect the aging of the cohort of children who were vaccinated under the childhood and adolescent HepA vaccination recommendations [2,5,14,25,26].

Coverage was very low among persons 40–49 years at 20% (vaccine coverage) and 12% (series completion). Low coverage among older travelers is concerning because persons over 40 years of age are at greater risk of serious and even fatal consequences of HAV infection. Adults over 50 years of age have an approximately sixfold increased risk of death from HAV infection [13].

Both race/ethnicity and sex were associated with hepatitis A vaccination among travelers. Vaccination coverage was significantly higher among travelers classified as Asian race/ethnicity. Higher coverage among Asians may, in part, reflect Asians may be vaccinated prior to travel to their country of origin to visit family or friends. Male travelers were more likely to be vaccinated than their female counterparts. The reason for this disparity may be related to other risk factors for HepA vaccination (MSM, IDU). In addition, male travelers had a higher employment rate than females and thus may had more chance to have business trip and being vaccinated through their employment benefits. The reason for this disparity merits further investigation.

Higher education level and increasing number of physician visits per year were both associated with HepA receipt among travelers. This result is consistent with other studies of adult vaccination [2429]. In general, persons with less than a high school education experience more barriers to health care possibly due to lack of knowledge about preventive services [3032]. It is not surprising that travelers with a greater number of physician contacts have higher vaccination coverage, since physician recommendations for vaccination are strongly associated with a patient’s decision to get vaccinated [3335]. Persons who have more frequent physician contact also have more opportunities to discuss travel plans and receive travel health related advice.

Living in the western United States Region was independently associated with a higher HepA receipt among travelers. Higher vaccination coverage was also observed in younger age group among travelers and non-travelers in the western United States Region. This result may reflect the aging of the cohort of children who were vaccinated under the initial childhood and adolescent HepA vaccination recommendations [2,5,14,25,26]. Vaccination was recommended initially for children and adolescents among 11 states where hepatitis A incidence were substantially higher than other U.S. regions [2,5,14,25,26]. Of those 11 states, 9 were western states.

HepB vaccination was significantly associated with higher HepA vaccination coverage among travelers in the bi-variable analysis even though HepB vaccination was excluded in multivariable model because of the significant correlation between receipt of hepatitis A vaccination and hepatitis B vaccination could distort the model. This association may reflect providers’ awareness of the possible need for both vaccines among persons traveling to countries with high or intermediate HAV and HBV (hepatitis B virus) endemicity [36]. Reported receipt of influenza vaccination in the past year was also associated with HepA vaccination among travelers. Annual influenza vaccination could provide a platform for delivering or recommending HepA vaccine to those who needed and thus may help increase vaccination coverage.

To increase vaccination coverage, public health programs and health-care providers are encouraged to inform adults receiving preventive clinical services of potential benefits of HepA vaccination. Greater vaccination coverage can be achieved by routinely assessing patients’ vaccination status, using standing orders for vaccination, incorporating vaccination information into electronic medical records, using immunization information systems (IIS) [37,38], and reminder-recall systems [35]. Providers should ask their patients’ upcoming travel plans and recommend and offer travel related vaccinations to their patients [9]. Increased efforts are needed to improve vaccination levels among travelers with lower vaccination coverage, particularly travelers 40–49 years or those with lower educational levels. Providers should recommend and encourage travelers 40–49 years or travelers with lower education to receive vaccination since they are less likely to have been vaccinated. Further studies are needed to examine the contribution of other factors so that we can more fully understand the complex causes of these patterns and especially ways to overcome barriers blocking higher coverage.

The findings in this study are subject to limitations. Data for this study were collected by self report and vaccination was not verified by medical records and thus may be subject to recall bias or lack of knowledge about the different types of hepatitis vaccines. Thus, coverage estimate from the NHIS may under or over report of hepatitis A vaccination among both travelers and non-travelers. However, previous studies have found that self-report of pneumococcal vaccination by adults was moderately or highly sensitive and moderately specific compared with reviews of medical records [39,40], with 1–5% net over-reporting bias. Self-report of influenza vaccination by adults also has been shown to have high sensitivity and moderate specificity, with 5–11% net over reporting bias [39].

This study documents national hepatitis A vaccination coverage among persons 18–49 years reported traveling to a country of high or intermediate endemicity, and underscores the need to continue monitoring hepatitis A vaccination coverage. Although travel status was an independent predictor of hepatitis A vaccination in our study, HepA vaccination among adult travelers to HAV endemic areas was low at approximately 27%. With the passage of the Affordable Care Act, all ACIP recommended vaccines would be covered by insurance providing greater access to vaccination. To further improve HepA vaccination coverage and reduce the burden of travel related HAV infection in the United States, healthcare providers are encouraged to adopt strategies to identify candidates for HepA vaccination, and to ensure that traveling adults and all adults at increased risk for HAV infection or seeking protection from HAV infection are offered hepatitis A vaccine [5,16,36,4144]. Travelers, especially health travelers with no provider visit, should see their doctor to discuss their travel related immunizations and other preventive care services since CDC recommended that international travelers should schedule a visit to a primary doctor or a travel medicine provider 4–6 weeks before trip [44].

Footnotes

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Hepatitis A vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2000;75:38–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999;48(12):1–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bell BP, Shapiro CN, Alter MJ, Moyer LA, Judson FN, Mottram K, et al. The diverse patterns of hepatitis A epidemiology in the United States-implications for vaccination strategies. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(6):1579–84. doi: 10.1086/314518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Armstrong GL, Bell BP. Hepatitis A virus infections in the United States: model-based estimates and implications for childhood immunization. Pediatrics. 2002;109:839–45. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR07):1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Surveillance for acute viral hepatitis – United States, 2007. MMWR. 2009;57(SS-03):1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Viral hepatitis statistics & surveillance. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/Statistics/2009Surveillance/index.htm (accessed 28.11.2011)
  • 8.Berge JJ, Drennan DP, Jacobs RJ, Jakins A, Meyerhoff AS, Stubblefield W, et al. The cost of hepatitis A infections in American adolescents and adults in 1997. Hepatology. 2000;31(2):469–73. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen LH, Hill DR, Wilder-Smith A. Vaccination of travelers: how far have we come and where are we going? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011 Nov;10(11):1609–20. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Steffen R, Amitirigala I, Mutsch M. Health risks among travelers – need for regular updates. J Travel Med. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):145–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ciccozzi M, Tosti ME, Gallo G, Ragni P, Zotti C, Lopalco P, et al. Risk of hepatitis A infection following travel. J Viral Hepat. 2002 Nov;9(6):460–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mele A, Stroffolini T, Palumbo F, Gallo G, Ragni P, Balocchini E, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for hepatitis A in Italy: public health indications from a 10-year surveillance. SEIEVA Collaborating Group. J Hepatol. 1997 Apr;26(4):743–7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80237-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mutsch M, Spicher VM, Gut C, Steffen R. Hepatitis A virus infections in travelers, 1988–2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:490–7. doi: 10.1086/499816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR. 1996;45:1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months — United States, 2011. MMWR. 2012;61(35):689–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dorell CG, Yankey D, Byrd KK, Murphy TV. Hepatitis A vaccination coverage among adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):213–21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rhodes SD, Yee LJ, Hergenrather KC. Hepatitis A vaccination among young African American men who have sex with men in the deep south: psychosocial predictors. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003 Apr;95(Suppl 4):31S–6S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Health Interview Survey. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2010/srvydesc.pdf [accessed 20.11.2011]
  • 19.Shah B, Barnwell B, Bieier G. SUDAAN User’s Manual, Release 10.1. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Predictive margins (direct standardization) pp. 1999126–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Seeff LC, Uhler R, Smith RA, et al. A national survey of primary care physicians’ methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:86–94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-2-200501180-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Serres G, Duval B, Shadmani R, Boulianne N, Pohani G, Naus M, et al. Ineffectiveness of the current strategy to prevent hepatitis A in travelers. J Travel Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):10–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2002.tb00872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Connor BA. Hepatitis A vaccine in the last-minute traveler. Am J Med. 2005 Oct 10A;118(Suppl):58S–62S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Hepatitis B vaccination coverage among adults – United States, 2004. MMWR. 2006;55(18):509–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu PJ, Byrd KK, Murphy TV, Weinbaum C. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage among high-risk adults 18-49 years U.S., 2009. Vaccine. 2011 Sep;29(40):7049–57. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Hepatitis B vaccination among high-risk adolescents and adults – San Diego California, 1998–2001. MMWR. 2002;51(28):618–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Egede LE, Zheng D. Racial/ethnic differences in influenza vaccination coverage in high-risk adults. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(12):2074–8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.12.2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu PJ, Singleton JA, Rangel MC, Wortley PM, Bridges CB. Influenza vaccination trends among adults 65 years or older in the United States, 1989–2002. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1849–56. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.16.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lu PJ, Nuorti JP. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination among adults aged 65 years and older U.S., 1989-2008. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):287–95. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dubikaytis T, Larivaara M, Kuznetsova O, Hemminki E. Inequalities in health and health service utilisation among reproductive age women in St. Petersburg, Russia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Nov;10:307. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peterson RL, Saag K, Wallace RB, Doebbling BN. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine receipt in older persons with chronic disease: a population-based study. Med Care. 1999;37(5):502–9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lave DG, Traven ND, Kuller LH. Participation in health promotion programs by the rural elderly. Am J Prev Med. 1995;11:46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Poland GA, Shefer AM, McCauley M, Webster PS, Whitley-Williams PN, Peter G. Standards for adult immunization practices. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:144–50. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Missed opportunities for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination of Medicare pneumonia inpatients – 12 Western States, 1995. MMWR. 1997;46(39):919–923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) General recommendation on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) MMWR. 2002;51(RR-2) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health information for international travel. 2012 Available at: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/yellowbook-2012-home.htm [accessed 15.1.2012]
  • 37.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Immunization information systems (IIS) Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/default.htm [accessed September, 2011]
  • 38.Guide to Community Preventive Services. Universally recommended vaccinations: immunization information systems. Atlanta, Georgia: guide to community preventive services; 2010. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/vaccines/universally/imminfosystems.html [accessed 24.9.2011] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Donald RM, Baken L, Nelson A, Nichol KL. Validation of self-report of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status in elderly outpatients. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(3):173–7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shenson D, Dimartino D, Bolen J, Campbell M, Lu PJ, Singleton JA. Validation of self-reported pneumococcal vaccination in behavioral risk factor surveillance surveys: experience from the sickness prevention achieved through regional collaboration (SPARC) program. Vaccine. 2005 Jan;23(8):1015–20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Byrd KK, Santibanez TA, Chaves SS. Predictors of hepatitis A vaccination among young children in the United States. Vaccine. 2011 Apr;29(17):3254–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Poland GA, Shefer AM, McCauley M, Webster PS, Whitely-Williams PN, Peter G, et al. Standards for adult immunization practice. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(2):144–50. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Task Force on Community Preventive Services. What Works to Promote Health? New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005. The guide to community preventive services; pp. 233–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) Update: prevention of hepatitis A after exposure to hepatitis A virus and in international travelers. Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR. 2007;56(41):1080–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES