Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Biomol NMR Assign. 2013 May 28;8(1):217–220. doi: 10.1007/s12104-013-9486-2

1H, 13C, and 15N backbone resonance assignments of the 37 kDa voltage-gated Ca2+ channel β4 subunit core SH3-GK domains

Xingfu Xu 1, William A Horne 1,
PMCID: PMC5822721  NIHMSID: NIHMS940538  PMID: 23712306

Abstract

The β subunit of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel (α1, α2δ, and β subunits) is a member of the MAGUK family of proteins and plays an essential role in regulating Ca2+ channel trafficking and gating. It also serves as a central interaction partner for various Ca2+ channel regulatory proteins. We report here the nearly complete 1H, 13C, and 15N backbone resonance assignments of the 37 kDa core SH3-GK domains of the β4 subunit. This is the first report of solution assignments for β subunits, and as such will lay the foundation for future investigations of interaction site mapping, functional dynamics, and protein complex structure determination.

Keywords: NMR resonance assignment, Ca2+ channel β subunit, Membrane associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK), SH3-domain, Guanylate-kinase domain

Biological context

Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCC) are large protein complexes found in the plasma membranes of excitable cells. They play critical roles in many cellular events such as excitation-contraction coupling, neurotransmitter release, and Ca2+-dependent gene transcription (Catterall 2011). The VGCC is composed of a pore-forming α1 subunit and auxiliary α2δ and β subunits. The β subunit is entirely cytosolic and plays an essential role in regulating α1 trafficking and gating properties. These functions are thought to occur mainly through a high-affinity interaction between the β subunit and the α1 interaction domain (AID) of the intracellular loop between α1 repeat motif I and II (Pragnell et al. 1994). The β subunits are encoded by four distinct genes (β1–β4), each with different splicing variants. An initial modeling study revealed that β subunits belong to the MAGUK family of proteins, containing conserved Src homology (SH3) and guanylate kinase (GK)-like domains connected by a variable hook sequence and flanked by variable sequence on both N and C termini (Hanlon et al. 1999). X-ray crystallography studies confirmed the conserved SH3-GK core domains in different β subunits and also revealed that the α1 AID binds to a hydrophobic groove in the β subunit GK domain (Chen et al. 2004; Opatowsky et al. 2004; Van Petegem et al. 2004).

Apart from the specific interaction between α1 and β subunits, a large β subunit-centered protein interaction network has recently been identified (reviewed in Buraei and Yang 2010). This suggests that a variety of signaling pathways can influence Ca2+ channel regulation via direct interaction with β subunits. For example, RGK (Rem, Gem/Kir) proteins, a group of small GTPases, interact with β subunits to induce marked inhibitory effects on Ca2+ channel currents (Beguin et al. 2001), and the presynaptic active zone protein Rab interacting molecule 1 (RIM1) interacts with the β subunit to generate a slowed inactivation of α1 and enhanced neurotransmitter release (Kiyonaka et al. 2007). However, due to lack of atomic-level structural studies, the underlying molecular mechanisms of these interactions remain unclear.

We aim to use solution NMR to study the interactions between the VGCC β subunit and its various interaction partners. As a start, we report here a nearly complete 1H, 13C and 15N backbone resonance assignment of the 37 KDa core SH3-GK domains of the VGCC β4 subunit.

Materials and methods

A DNA construct encoding human VGCC β4 SH3 (16–135) and GK (166–374) domains separated by two serine residues was synthesized using overlap extension PCR and subcloned into the pET15b expression vector (Novagen). The two serine residues in addition to the intrinsically disordered region 166–174 (AKQKQKVTE) (Van Petegem et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2011) serve as a flexible linker for connecting SH3 and GK domains. The construct was expressed in E. coli BL21 Rosetta (DE3) pLysS (Novagen) as an N-terminal His6-tag fusion protein. Two additional Cys to Ser mutations (β4 C70S and β4 C112S) were performed to improve protein stability. Freshly transformed cells were first grown overnight in 10 mL LB media at 37 °C before being transferred into 50 mL M9 media supplemented with 15NH4Cl, U–2H–13C-glucose (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover MA) dissolved in 80 % D2O. The cells were then grown for 12 h and centrifuged at 5,000 RPM. The pellet was resuspended into 1 L M9 with 15NH4Cl, U–2H–13C-glucose in 99.8 % D2O and grown at 37 °C with vigorous shaking until OD600 0.5 was reached. One gram of 2H, 13C, and 15N labeled Celtone amino acid mixture (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) was dissolved in 5 mL D2O, filtered, and added to the media. Protein expression was induced by adding IPTG to a final concentration 0.5 mM. After 16 h induction at 30 °C, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 RPM, resuspended in a binding buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 0.5 M NaCl, and lysed by sonication. The lysate was incubated with 50 units of DNase I (Bio-Rad) for 30 min and centrifuged at 17,000 RPM for 30 min. The supernatant was filtered and then loaded onto a 15-ml Ni2+ resin column (Bio-Rad) pre-equilibrated with 100 ml of binding buffer. After washing with eight column volumes of binding buffer, the protein was eluted with increasing concentrations of imidazole (up to 300 mM). Guanidine hydrochloride was added to the concentrated protein fractions to allow fast amide deuterium-proton exchange in the unfolded state. The protein was refolded by rapid dilution into buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, and 5 mM DTT. Guanidine hydrochloride was removed by dialysis against the same buffer at 4 °C. The final protein purification was achieved by FPLC gel filtration using a Sephacryl S-200 HR column (AKTA, GE Healthcare) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.5 M NaCl.

The 2H, 15N and 13C labeled β4 core domain sample was concentrated to 0.5 mM and exchanged into 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.02 % NaN3, 50 mM Glu/Arg, and 10 % D2O by repeated centrifugation using an Amicon Ultra-15 30 K filter unit (EMD Millipore) at 3,000 RPM. All NMR experiments were performed at 298 K on Varian Inova 500 MHz, 600 MHz, and 900 MHz spectrometers equipped with triple resonance cryogenic probes. Backbone assignments were made from TROSY type 1H–15N HSQC, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, HN(CA)CB, HN(COCA)CB, HNCO, and HN(CA)CO. A TROSY–1H–15N HSQC_NOESY was also recorded to verify the assignments by checking the sequential or inter-strand NH–NH NOEs. All spectra were processed with NMRPipe (Delaglio et al. 1995) and analyzed using CCPNMR (Vranken et al. 2005).

Resonances assignment and data deposition

Ninety-two percent of expected backbone amide pairs (286 out of 312 non-proline residues) have been assigned, excluding the 21 residues of the N-terminal His6-tag and the two serines used to bridge SH3 and GK (Fig. 1). Additionally, 92 % of Cα (305 out of 329), 91 % of C′ (300 out of 329) and 89 % of Cβ (282 out of 318) resonances have been assigned. Residues without assignments include N216-S219, S227-N228, K295-S298, D309-L311 and the C-terminal tail, T349-S351. The missing assignments could be due to either chemical exchange or significant resonance overlapping.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of 0.5 mM β4 SH3-GK core in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 100 mM NaCl, recorded at 298 K with a 900 MHz spectrometer. Cross-peaks are marked with residue type and sequence numbers. The crowded central region is enlarged and shown in the inset

Consensus chemical shift index analysis (Wishart and Sykes 1994) based on assigned Cα, Cβ and C′ chemical shifts was used to predict the secondary structure shown in Fig. 2. The results are in close agreement with β4 core domain secondary structural elements observed in a crystallography study (Chen et al. 2004). Interestingly, there is a notable difference between β3 and β4 in the loop region formed by K220-R227 that may be due to a single amino acid exchange. Chemical shift index, NH–NH NOE analysis, and X-ray crystallography indicate that there is no regular secondary structure for this region in β4. By contrast, the highly homologous β3 core crystal structure shows an α-helix in this region (Chen et al. 2004; Opatowsky et al. 2004). The backbone 15N, 1H, 13C′, 13Cα and side chain 13Cβ chemical shifts have been deposited in the BioMagResBank (http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu) under accession number 19501.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Secondary structure prediction from Consensus Chemical shift index analysis based on Cα, Cβ and C′ chemical shifts. Bars are used to represents the C chemical shift differences relative to their random coil values

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by NIH Grant NS42600 (WAH) and NSF Grant IOS 0719242 (WAH). This study made use of the National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, Wisconsin, which is supported by NIH Grants P41RR02301 (BRTP/NCRR) and P41GM66326 (NIGMS). Additional equipment was purchased with funds from the University of Wisconsin, the NIH (RR02781, RR08438), the NSF (DMB-8415048, OIA-9977486, BIR-9214394), and the USDA. The authors thank Dr. Robert Oswald for many helpful discussions.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beguin P, Nagashima K, Gonoi T, Shibasaki T, Takahashi K, Kashima Y, Ozaki N, Geering T, Iwanaga T, Seino S. Regulation of Ca2+ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem. Nature. 2001;411:701–706. doi: 10.1038/35079621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buraei Z, Yang J. The beta subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:1461–1506. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00057.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catterall WA. Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a003947. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen YH, Li MH, Zhang Y, He LL, Yamada Y, Fitzmaurice A, Shen Y, Zhang HL, Tong L, Yang J. Structural basis of the alpha(1)-beta subunit interaction of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Nature. 2004;429:675–680. doi: 10.1038/nature02641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe—a multidimensional spectral processing system based on unix pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanlon MR, Berrow NS, Dolphin AC, Wallace BA. Modelling of a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel β subunit as a basis for understanding its functional properties. FEBS Lett. 1999;445:366–370. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00156-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kiyonaka S, Wakamori M, Miki T, Uriu Y, Nonaka M, Bito H, Beedle AM, Mori E, Hara Y, De Waard M, Kanagawa M, Itakura M, Takahashi M, Campbell KP, Mori Y. RIM1 confers sustained activity and neurotransmitter vesicle anchoring to presynaptic Ca2+ channels. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:691–701. doi: 10.1038/nn1904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Opatowsky Y, Chen CC, Campbell KP, Hirsch JA. Structural analysis of the voltage-dependent calcium channel beta subunit functional core and its complex with the alpha 1 interaction domain. Neuron. 2004;42:387–399. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pragnell M, DeWaard M, Mori Y, Tanabe T, Snutch TP, Campbell KP. Calcium-channel beta-subunit binds to a conserved motif in the I–II cytoplasmic linker of the alpha(1)-subunit. Nature. 1994;368:67–70. doi: 10.1038/368067a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Petegem F, Clark KA, Chatelain FC, Minor DL., Jr Structure of a complex between a voltage-gated calcium channel beta-subunit and an alpha-subunit domain. Nature. 2004;429:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nature02588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas P, Ulrich EL, Markley JL, Ionides J, Laue ED. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins. 2005;59:687–696. doi: 10.1002/prot.20449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wishart DS, Sykes BD. The C-13 chemical-shift index—a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using C-13 chemical-shift data. J Biomol NMR. 1994;4:171–180. doi: 10.1007/BF00175245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu X, Lee YJ, Holm JB, Terry MD, Oswald RE, Horne WA. The Ca2+ channel beta4c subunit interacts with heterochromatin protein 1 via a PXVXL binding motif. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:9677–9687. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.187864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES