Abstract
Nutrient signalling integrates and coordinates gene expression, metabolism and growth. However, its primary molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood in plants and animals. Here we report novel Ca2+ signalling triggered by nitrate with live imaging of an ultrasensitive biosensor in Arabidopsis leaves and roots. A nitrate-sensitized and targeted functional genomic screen identifies subgroup III Ca2+-sensor protein kinases (CPKs) as master regulators orchestrating primary nitrate responses. A chemical switch with the engineered CPK10(M141G) kinase enables conditional analyses of cpk10,30,32 to define comprehensive nitrate-associated regulatory and developmental programs, circumventing embryo lethality. Nitrate-CPK signalling phosphorylates conserved NIN-LIKE PROTEIN (NLP) transcription factors (TFs) to specify reprogramming of gene sets for downstream TFs, transporters, N-assimilation, C/N-metabolism, redox, signalling, hormones, and proliferation. Conditional cpk10,30,32 and nlp7 similarly impair nitrate-stimulated system-wide shoot growth and root establishment. The nutrient-coupled Ca2+ signalling network integrates transcriptome and cellular metabolism with shoot-root coordination and developmental plasticity in shaping organ biomass and architecture.
Introduction
Photosynthetic plants are masters in assimilating inorganic chemical resources to organic nutrients that sustain human societies and the food webs of diverse ecosystems. Although sugars derived from plant assimilation of CO2 and H2O via photosynthesis contribute to world-wide biomass and agricultural production, nitrogen taken from the soil or air serves as the gatekeeper in integrating C/N nutrient signalling networks and coordinating shoot-root nutrient communications and growth1–6. In multicellular organisms, growth factors and hormones are ineffective in growth promotion without the support of C/N nutrient signalling networks5,7,8. Surprisingly little is known about the primary nutrient signalling mechanisms in plants and animals beyond the roles of evolutionarily conserved transceptors, target of rapamycin, and AMP-activated protein kinase2,5–11.
Nitrate is the primary nitrogen source for most plants and the limiting factor for growth in aerobic soil4,6,12. Nitrate rapidly stimulates integrated nutrient transport and assimilation, as well as C/N metabolic and regulatory pathways that enable plant growth plasticity to respond and adapt to fluctuating environments. Genetic and genomic evidence suggest that nitrate drives rapid transcriptional regulation and nitrate signalling is uncoupled from nitrate metabolism1,3,4,9,11–22. Regulatory components in nitrate sensing and signalling, including the NRT1.1/NPF6.3 transceptor and associated CIPKs (Calcineurin-B-Like-Interacting PKs) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C/ABI2), as well as nitrate-responsive cis-elements (NRE) and TFs, have been identified with molecular, genetic, genomic and systems analyses1,3,6,9–25. Importantly, Arabidopsis NLP6 and NLP7 have been implicated as key TFs of primary nitrate responses12,14,17,18.Despite these advances, the molecular mechanism underlying primary nitrate signalling downstream of multiple sensors to integrated transcription, transport, metabolism and systemic growth programs (Fig. 1a) remains enigmatic4,6,9–12,16,25.
Ca2+ is an evolutionarily conserved and versatile signalling modulator in diverse regulatory pathways, including stress, immune and neuron signalling26–31. Although a role of Ca2+ signalling in nitrate responsive gene regulation has been implicated in maize leaves and Arabidopsis roots32,33, many outstanding questions remained in both plants and animals, such as whether distinct Ca2+ signatures are involved in primary nutrient signalling with cell specificity, the specific patterns of Ca2+ dynamics, the identity of intracellular Ca2+ sensors, how Ca2+ sensors relay signalling specificity, and the downstream targets of Ca2+ signalling in the nutrient-growth regulatory networks.
Nitrate triggers unique Ca2+-CPK signalling
To elucidate the primary mechanism in nitrate signalling, we developed integrated seedling and cell-based assays in Arabidopsis. Without exogenous nitrogen, seed reserves supported rapid initial seedling growth after germination (Fig. 1b). However, the increase in biomass ceased after four days even with illumination and sucrose supplies (Fig. 1c, d). Although NH4+ or glutamine (Gln) was transported, sensed and utilized6,34–35, only nitrate (0.1–10 mM) promoted distinct shoot biomass accumulation and root system architecture establishment. Nitrate, but not metabolites, NH4+ or Gln that are derived from nitrate assimilation, sustained substantial postembryonic growth (Fig. 1a, c, d, and Extended Data Fig. 1a), consistent with uncoupling of nitrate signalling from nitrate metabolism4,13, NH4+ or Gln signalling6,34,35.
Although nitrate-triggered Ca2+ signals could be detected using transgenic aequorin seedlings26,33, the response was subtle when compared with the flg22-induced Ca2+ signals in immune signalling (Extended Data Fig. 1b, c). As nitrate signalling and assimilation occur in both leaves and roots (Extended Data Fig. 1a, d, e), we developed a versatile single-cell system to investigate live Ca2+ signalling stimulated by nitrate in mesophyll protoplasts5,17,18,27. In leaf cells co-expressing the ultrasensitive Ca2+ biosensor GCaMP636 and a nuclear mCherry, single-cell live recordings revealed that nitrate specifically stimulated a unique and dynamic Ca2+ signature in the nucleus and cytosol (Fig. 1e, f). Chelating exogenous Ca2+ by EGTA diminished the nitrate-triggered Ca2+ signature (Fig. 1f). Unlike the transient and acute [Ca2+]cyt increase stimulated by osmotic and cold stresses in seedlings26,37, nuclear Ca2+oscillation in symbiosis38, or a 10 sec [Ca2+]cyt peak triggered by nitrate in roots33, a gradually rising subcellular Ca2+ signature attributed to nitrate over a course of minutes was recorded by GCaMP6-based imaging with high subcellular resolution. Time-lapse recording using transgenic GCaMP6 plants uncovered a Ca2+ signature of similar amplitude and dynamic stimulated by nitrate in mesophyll cells of intact plants (Fig. 1g). Distinct Ca2+ dynamics was also triggered by nitrate in the tip, pericycle and stele of intact roots11,18,20 (Extended Data Fig. 1f, g). To physiologically connect this distinctive Ca2+ signature (Supplementary Video 1–4) to established primary nitrate responses, we showed that activation of universal nitrate-responsive marker genes, NIR (NITRITE REDUCTASE), G6PD3 (GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE3) and FNR2 (FERREDOXIN-NADP+-OXIDOREDUCTASE2), was significantly reduced by Gd3+ and La3+ (blockers of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels) or W7 (an intracellular Ca2+ sensor inhibitor) (Extended Data Fig. 2a, b) in seedlings27,32,33. Our results support a crucial role for nitrate-induced Ca2+ signalling in multiple cell types of different tissues and organs.
To search for candidates of intracellular Ca2+ sensors mediating primary nitrate signalling, we conducted an in-gel kinase assay and detected enhanced activity of endogenous Ca2+-dependent PKs in response to nitrate within 10 min (Extended Data Fig. 2c). The molecular weight of nitrate-activated PKs was similar to that of most CPKs but not CIPKs10,22,23,27. There are 34 Arabidopsis CPK genes mediating diverse signalling pathways with complex and redundant functions27,28,30,39. As cpk mutants have escaped from mutant screens for nitrate signalling11,16, a simple, rapid and reliable cell-based reporter assay could facilitate targeted functional genomic screening of CPK candidates involved in nitrate signalling27. Using a luciferase (LUC) reporter gene NIR-LUC that exhibits a physiological nitrate response in transgenic Arabidopsis plants16, we observed rapid, specific and sensitive regulation of LUC activity by 0.1 to 50 mM KNO3 within 2 h (Extended Data Fig. 2d-f). Unexpectedly, co-expressing NIR-LUC with a constitutively active construct (CPKac)27 for each of the 25 CPKs expressed in mesophyll protoplasts did not trigger marked NIR-LUC activation (Fig. 1h). To test the possibility that CPKac-mediated response could be sensitized by low nitrate, we added 0.5 mM KNO3 to the protoplast incubation medium. Interestingly, subgroup III CPK7/8/10/13/30/32ac were most effective to act synergistically with 0.5 mM KNO3 for NIR-LUC activation (Fig. 1h, i and Extended Data Fig. 2g). Although specific CPKac is sufficient to activate stress or immune responses associated with strong and distinct Ca2+ signalling patterns26–28,30,37, activation of subgroup III CPKac alone did not fully evoke specific nitrate response. Consistent with our findings, it has been suggested that primary nitrate signalling requires the coordination of multiple signalling mechanisms6,9,10,17,18,40. Our results indicate that nitrate may specify and synergize functionally redundant subgroup III CPKs in NIR-LUC activation.
Chemical switch defines CPK signalling
To test the specificity and physiological roles of subgroup III CPKs, we examined loss-of-function cpk mutants. The single cpk7, cpk8, cpk10, cpk13, cpk30 or cpk32 mutants barely affected nitrate responsive genes and lacked overt growth phenotypes (Extended Data Fig. 3a-g). As CPK10 and CPK30 share the highest sequence identity and slight modulation of NIR and G6PD3 expression (Fig. 1i and Extended Data Fig. 2g, 3d), we attempted to generate the cpk10,30 double mutant. However, analyses of the siliques revealed that the cpk10,30 double mutant was lethal at early embryogenesis (Fig. 2a, b).
Aiming to simultaneously overcome embryo lethality and enable analyses of higher-order cpk mutants, we engineered CPK10 to be reversibly inhibited by 3MB-PP1-IsoP (3MBiP), a specific and improved derivative of the PK inhibitor PP1 (4-amino-5-(methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo-(3,4-d)pyrimidine) (Fig. 2c)41,42. A critical determinant of PK inhibitor selectivity is the size of the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-binding pocket41,42. By aligning the conserved PK subdomain V in Arabidopsis CPK10/30 and human CaMKII, we created the CPK10(M141G) gatekeeper residue mutant (Fig. 2d). Importantly, 3MBiP completely inhibited the kinase activity of CPK10(M141G) but not wild-type (WT) CPK10 (Fig. 2e). A genomic construct expressing CPK10(M141G) was introduced into cpk10, cpk30/+ to rescue the lethal embryo phenotype of its cpk10,30 progenies, creating a 3MBiP-inducible icpk10,30 mutant (Fig. 2a, b). The HA-tagged CPK10(M141G) protein immunoprecipitated from the transgenic plants was completely inhibited by 3MBiP (Fig. 2f). Because CPK32ac greatly enhanced NIR-LUC expression (Fig. 1h), we also generated the cpk10,32 and cpk30,32 double mutants, as well as the 3MBiP-inducible icpk10,30,32 triple mutant expressing CPK10(M141G)-HA (designated icpk) by genetic crosses and molecular confirmation. Nitrate responsive marker genes showed a reduction in double mutants, including cpk10,32, cpk30,32 and icpk10,30 in the presence of 3MBiP (Extended Data Fig. 3i, j) without displaying visible phenotype in plant growth supported by nitrate (Extended Data Fig. 3d, e, g). Expression of nitrate marker genes was further reduced in the 3MBiP-inducible icpk triple mutant (Fig. 2g), correlated with retarded plant growth (Extended Data Fig. 3h). Insensitivity of WT plants to 3MBiP treatment in gene expression and seedling growth (Fig. 2g and Extended Data Fig. 3e, f, h, j) validated the specificity of 3MBiP. By overcoming dual genetic redundancy and embryo lethality, chemical genetics offers a new approach to further elucidate the dynamic and physiological functions of higher-order cpk mutants not previously possible.
Nitrate-CPKs control primary transcription
To explore the genome-wide transcriptional landscape controlled by nitrate-CPK signalling, we conducted RNA-seq experiments 15 min after nitrate induction in WT and icpk seedlings. In WT seedlings, 394 and 79 genes were activated and repressed, respectively, in response to nitrate (log2≥ 1 or ≤ −1; q-value ≤ 0.05), which significantly overlapped with nitrate-responsive genes discovered in microarray-based studies of both roots and shoots1,13,15,18. In icpk, 266 up-regulated (68%) and 44 down-regulated (56%) genes could be defined as statistically significant nitrate-CPK target genes (icpk KNO3 vs. WT KNO3, q-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 3, Extended Data Fig. 4, 5 and Supplementary Table 1 and 2). Thus, CPK10/30/32 play a central role in regulating primary nitrate responses in the entire plant system.
Among the statistically significant primary nitrate-CPK target genes, CPK10/30/32 modulated diverse key cellular and metabolic functions immediately activated by nitrate1,3,4,6,12,13,15,17,18,25. The most significantly enriched functional classes of genes were those supporting nitrate transport and assimilation; two routes of glucose-6-phosphate metabolism via the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway (OPP) and glycolysis; amino acid transport and metabolism; other transporters; C/N-metabolism; cytokinin, auxin and abscisic acid (ABA) metabolism and signalling; protein degradation; stress; signalling; and transcription (Fig. 3b, c, Extended Data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1 and 2). Remarkably, the universal nitrate-inducible genes responsible for the conserved nitrogen uptake and assimilation processes from Arabidopsis, rice to maize were regulated by CPK10/30/32 (Extended Data Fig. 4e-g)1,3,4,12,17,18,21,32. Nearly 50 genes encoding annotated TFs were activated by nitrate via CPK10/30/32 (Supplementary Table 2), providing potential amplification of the downstream nitrate transcriptional network17,18,20,24,25. Nitrate-CPK signalling repressed genes were involved in transcription, metabolism and transport (Extended Data Fig. 4b, d and Supplementary Table 2).
We carried out RT-qPCR analyses of primary nitrate-CPK target genes for eight major functional classes, including OPP, nitrate and amino acid transporters, N-metabolism, CHO-metabolism, signalling, cytokinin synthesis, and TFs in WT and icpk mutant plants (Extended Data Fig. 4f, g and Supplementary Table 2). Notably, nitrate activation of CYP735A2 expression to enhance trans-zeatin synthesis is critical for shoot development, providing an interconnection between local and systemic nitrate signalling via the action of a mobile growth hormone43. As nitrate activation of these marker genes was markedly diminished in the icpk mutant, CPK10/30/32 are master regulators in primary nitrate signalling and integrate global gene expression to nitrate-activated metabolic and physiological responses (Fig. 3, Extended Data Fig. 4e-g and Supplementary Table 2).
Nitrate-CPKs dictate growth plasticity
To investigate the nexus between nitrate-specific developmental programs (Fig. 1c, d) and nitrate-CPK signalling, we examined shoot growth by quantifying shoot fresh weight in WT and icpk seedlings. To bypass any early effect of nitrate on seed germination, we selected 3-day-old seedlings without apparent phenotypes on ammonium plates and placed them on 3MBiP medium in the presence of KCl, NH4+, Gln or KNO3 for 5–8 days. Although NH4+ or Gln could promote limited shoot greening and growth equally in WT and icpk seedlings, nitrate was essential for full greening and expansion of cotyledons and true leaves in WT (Fig. 4 and Extended Data Fig. 1a, 6a)3,16. The specific icpk deficiency of cotyledon and leaf expansion in response to nitrate (Fig. 4a-c) might be partially correlated with reduced expression of CYP735A2 for trans-zeatin synthesis (Extended Data Fig. 4f, g)43.
We next examined the roles of CPK10/30/32 in nitrate-specific control of the root developmental program. The nitrate-specific stimulation of lateral root primordia density was reduced and lateral root elongation was severely retarded in icpk (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 6). Although ammonium supported lateral root initiation similarly in WT and icpk seedlings6,35, nitrate-CPK signalling was essential for lateral root primordia progression and emergence, as well as lateral root elongation (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 6c-e). We quantified the dynamic distribution of all lateral roots from primordia stages I-VII to emergence (Em) and fully elongated (LR) stages44 in WT and icpk. The proportion of emerged lateral root (Em+LR) increased from 0% (4 days) to 40% (8 days) after transfer to the nitrate medium, and 3MBiP did not affect normal root system development in WT. In contrast, the icpk lateral root primordia were arrested most conspicuously in roots 6–8 days after transfer (Extended Data Fig. 6d-g).
Intriguingly, the primary root length was similar between WT and icpk in 8-day-old seedlings on KCl or on different nitrogen media. Thus, the growth of primary roots at the early stage of development immediately after germination relied mainly on the seed nutrient reserves and sugars with limited influence by exogenous nitrogen nutrients (Extended Data Fig. 6a, b)2,5. In 11-day-old plants, WT and icpk plants were indistinguishable on KCl, NH4+ or Gln medium, displaying limited shoot and root growth and development. However, vigorous primary and lateral root growth promoted by exogenous nitrate was abolished in icpk (Fig. 1c, d and 4c)16. CPK10/30/32 specifically defined the long-term systemic shoot developmental program and root system architecture via modulating the primary nitrate-signalling network6,16.
The nitrate-CPK-NLP regulatory network
Arabidopsis
NLP6 and NLP7 have been identified as key TFs of primary nitrate responses, but how NLP6/7 are activated by nitrate remains a mystery6,12–14,17,18,25. Analyses of transgenic plants revealed a nitrate-stimulated NLP6/7-MYC mobility shift at 5–30 min, which was eliminated by phosphatase (Fig. 5a, b and Extended Data Fig. 7a, b). The nitrate-stimulated NLP7-MYC phosphorylation was greatly diminished by Gd3+ and La3+ (Fig. 5c), or by W7 (Extended Data Fig. 7c), analogous to the nitrate responsive gene regulation (Extended Data Fig. 2a, b). Furthermore, CPK10/30/32, but not the kinase-dead CPK10KM or the subgroup I CPK11, phosphorylated NLP7 in vitro (Fig. 5d). As the Ca2+ chelator EGTA abolished the phosphorylation of NLP7 or histone by CPK10/30/32 but not by CPK10/30/32ac lacking the Ca2+-binding domain27–30 (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 7d), CPK10/30/32 were Ca2+ sensors and effectors to relay nitrate signalling. The nitrate-CPK-NLP6/7 signalling link was further supported by the significant overlaps between nitrate-CPK and nitrate-NLP6/7 target genes as universal nitrate response marker genes (Fig. 3c, Extended Data Fig. 4, 5 and Supplementary Table 2)12,17,18.
By aligning nine Arabidopsis NLPs and four orthologous Lotus japonicus NLPs using integrated computational and literature analyses12,17,18, we identified a uniquely conserved serine (S205 in NLP7) as a candidate CPK phosphorylation site (Extended Data Fig. 7e). CPK10ac, CPK30ac and CPK32ac phosphorylated the nitrate responsive domain of WT NLP7-N(1–581 a.a.)17 but not NLP7-N(S205A) (Extended Data Fig. 7f). Moreover, NLP7(S205A) lost nitrate-stimulated phosphorylation in transgenic plants (Extended Data Fig. 7g). Mass spectrometry analyses confirmed that S205 in NLP7 was phosphorylated in vivo in the presence of nitrate (Fig. 5f). Like CPK10/30/32ac, NLP7 overexpression but neither kinase-dead CPK10ac(KM) nor NLP7(S205A), acted synergistically with 0.5 mM nitrate to enhance NIR-LUC activation (Fig. 1h and Extended Data Fig. 7h). Finally, nitrate-triggered NLP7 phosphorylation at S205 in vivo was abolished in the icpk mutant (Fig. 5g).
To further validate the nitrate-CPK-NLP link, we discovered nitrate-stimulated rapid nuclear translocation of CPK10-GFP, CPK30-GFP and CPK32-GFP by confocal imaging (Fig. 6a and Extended Data Fig. 8a). Only NLP7-GFP but not NLP7(S205A)-GFP responded to nitrate stimulation with persistent nuclear localization in leaf cells (Fig. 6b) and in the transgenic nlp7 roots (Extended Data Fig. 8b)18. Using in vivo Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) assay, we showed that CPK10KM directly interacted with NLP7 in the nucleus in the presence of nitrate in protoplasts (Fig. 6c). Nitrate stimulated nuclear retention of NLP7-GFP was greatly diminished in icpk protoplasts (Fig. 6d). These complementary in vivo and in vitro analyses provided compelling evidence to support the signalling connections from CPK10/30/32 to NLP phosphorylation in mediating primary nitrate signalling and transcription.
To identify functionally significant NLP7 target genes in the nitrate-CPK-NLP signalling network, we explored genome-wide transcriptional profiling in the nitrate-responsive transient transactivation system12,17,18. We discovered that NLP7-HA but not NLP7(S205A)-HA could robustly activate a wide range of putative NLP7 target genes in mesophyll cells (Extended Data Fig. 9a-c and Supplementary Table 1, 2)1,12,17,18,32. Notably, NLP7 could also target and ectopically activate NRT2.1 and TPPB, which are normally silenced in mesophyll cells but are nitrate inducible in root cells (Fig. 3, Extended Data Fig. 9a, c). Our results are consistent with the activation of NRT2.1-LUC, NRE-LUC or NIR-LUC by ectopic NLP1,2,5,6,7,9 expression17,18, the repression of primary nitrate responsive marker genes in dominant-negative NLP6 (NLP6-SUPRD) transgenic plants12,17, as well as ChIP-chip analyses of NLP7-GFP after 10-min nitrate treatment in transgenic seedlings18. Interestingly, we also identified potential NLP7 target genes for cell cycle initiation and auxin hormone regulators (Extended Data Fig. 9b, c). Future research will aim to fully elucidate the functions of specific NLP7 target genes in various plant organs and cell types. The identification of novel NLP7 target genes was supported by the unique nlp7 phenotypes and the complementation of nlp7 by NLP7-GFP but not NLP7(S205A)-GFP for proliferation and growth in shoots and roots (Fig. 6e, f and Extended Data Fig. 10). The broad spectrum of nitrate-associated mutant phenotypes and primary nitrate-responsive-transcriptome defects were shared by icpk and nlp714,18. As the specific serine residue is conserved among Arabidopsis NLPs and LjNLPs (Extended Data Fig. 7e), CPK10/30/32 could potentially phosphorylate and activate all NLPs and possibly other TFs with overlapping or distinct target genes to support transcriptional, metabolic and system-wide nutrient-growth regulations differentially manifested in WT and conditional icpk mutant plants (Fig. 2g, 3–6 and Extended Data Fig. 3–10)6,12,14,17,18,25.
Discussion
We have uncovered a nitrate-coupled Ca2+ signalling mechanism central to the plant nutrient-growth regulatory network using multifaceted approaches, encompassing an ultrasensitive Ca2+ biosensor, a sensitized and targeted functional genomic screen, a chemical switch for conditional higher-order Arabidopsis cpk mutants, as well as integrated cellular, biochemical, genetic and systems analyses. Our findings connected a novel Ca2+-CPK-NLP signalling cascade to comprehensive nitrate responses and revealed a previously unrecognized function of Ca2+-sensor CPKs as master regulators in orchestrating nitrate-activated signalling (Fig. 6g). As CPKs and NLPs are evolutionarily conserved from algae to land plants12,14,17,18,28–30, the nitrate-CPK-NLP signalling relay may be widespread in the plant kingdom. Our discoveries expand the biological functions of Ca2+ signalling to nutrient responses essential to all life forms. Future research will likely identify new sensors, channels and other regulators involved in generating complex Ca2+ signatures in plant responses to nitrate, other nutrients, peptides, hormones, and environmental cues capitalizing on continued advances of ultrasensitive Ca2+ biosensors36. This work provides a molecular framework for future research on the complex interactions between glucose and nitrogen signalling pathways central to all aspects of nutrient-mediated growth regulation in plants and animals1–8.
METHODS
Plasmid constructs and transgenic lines
The 1.3 kb GCaMP6 coding region was PCR amplified from the pGP-CMV-GCaMP6s plasmid (Addgene)45. The amplified DNA was then inserted into the plant expression vector (the HBT-HA-NOS plasmid)46 to generate the HBT-GCaMP6-HA construct. The HBT-GCaMP6-HA construct was inserted into the binary vector pCB30247 to generate the HBT-GCaMP6-HA transgenic plants using the Agrobacterium (GV3101)-mediated floral-dip method48. Transgenic plants were selected by spraying with the herbicide BASTA. The construct expressing HY5-mCherry used as a control for protoplast co-transfection and nucleus-labelling was obtained from Dr. Jin-Gui Chen49. NLS-Td-Tomato used as a control for protoplast co-transfection and nucleus-labelling was obtained from Dr. Xiayan Liu. NIR-LUC was constructed as described previously16. UBQ10-GUS that is a control for protoplast co-transfection and internal control, all HBT-CPKac-FLAG-NOS expression plasmids have been described27. To construct HBT-CPK-GFP-NOS, the coding region of the CPK10, 30, 32 cDNA was amplified and then cloned into the HBT-GFP-NOS plasmid27. HBT-CPK10(M141G)-FLAG was generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the HBT-CPK10-FLAG construct. To complement the cpk10, 30/+ mutant, a 5.5 kb DNA fragment including the promoter region (3 kb) and the coding region of CPK10 was amplified from genomic DNA, which was then cloned into the plasmid HBT-HA-NOS and mutagenized to generate pCPK10-CPK10(M141G)-HA-NOS. The pCPK10-CPK10(M141G)-HA-NOS construct was inserted into pCB302 and transformed into cpk10, 30/+ mutant plants using the Agrobacterium (GV3101)-mediated floral-dip method48. At the T3 generation, homozygous single copy insertion lines were screened for the cpk10,30 double mutant carrying pCPK10-CPK10(M141G)-HA-NOS to obtain the 3MBiP-inducible icpk10,30 double mutant, which rescued the embryo lethality of the cpk10,30 double mutant. The 3MBiP-inducible icpk10,30,32 triple mutant expressing CPK10(M141G)-HA (designated icpk) was generated by genetic cross to cpk32 and confirmed by molecular analyses. To construct 35SΩ-NLP6-MYC or 35SΩ-NLP7-MYC in the pCB302 binary plasmid with hygromycin B selection, the β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene in the 35SΩ-GUS plasmid50 was replaced with the DNA fragment encoding the full-length NLP6 or NLP7 fused to 6 copies of the MYC epitope tag in the HBT-NLP6-MYC or HBT-NLP7-MYC plasmid17. The NLP6-MYC and NLP7-MYC transgenic plants were generated by Agrobacterium (GV3101)-mediated transformation by floral dip and hygromycin B resistance selection. To construct HBT-NLP7-HA and HBT-NLP7-GFP, the 2.9 kb coding region of the NLP7 cDNA was amplified and then cloned into the HBT-NOS plasmid. HBT-NLP7(S205A)-HA and HBT-NLP7(S205A)-GFP were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. A 7.9 kb genomic DNA fragment of NLP7 was cloned into the pUC plasmid and fused with GFP at the C-terminus to generate pNLP7-NLP7-GFP. The pNLP7-NLP7(S205A)-GFP construct was generated by site-directed mutagenesis. pNLP7-NLP7-GFP or pNLP7-NLP7(S205A)-GFP was then inserted into pCB302 and introduced into nlp7–1 mutant plants using the Agrobacterium (GV3101)-mediated floral-dip48 method for complementation analyses. To construct UBQ10-CPK10KM-YN and UBQ10-NLP7-YC, the coding regions of CPK10KM, NLP7, YFP-N terminus and YFP-C terminus were amplified by PCR and cloned into UBQ10-GUS plasmid. To construct pET14-NLP7-N(1–581)-HIS and pET14-NLP7-N(S205A)-HIS for protein expression, the N-terminal coding region of NLP7 and NLP7 S205A were amplified from HBT-NLP7-HA and HBT-NLP7(S205A)-HA. All constructs were verified by sequencing. The primers used for plasmid construction and site-directed mutagenesis are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Plant materials and growth conditions
Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia (Col-0) was used as wild type (WT). The cpk mutants were obtained from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Centre (ABRC)51. Homozygous T-DNA lines were identified by using CPK gene specific primers and T-DNA left border primers. The gene specific primers used are listed in the Supplementary Table 4. Double mutants were obtained by genetic crosses between cpk10–1, cpk30–1 and cpk32–1, and confirmed by PCR. For RT-PCR analysis of cpk single mutants, around 30 plants were grown on the petri dish (150 mm × 15 mm) containing 100 ml of ½× MS medium salt, 0.1% MES, 0.5% sucrose, 0.7% phytoagar under constant light (150 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for 7 days. Samples were collected for RT-PCR analysis. To generate icpk, cpk32–1 was crossed to icpk10,30. F2 plants were first screened for resistance to BASTA and then confirmed by genotyping (primers listed in Supplementary Table 4) for the homozygous cpk10,30,32 triple mutants. The homozygous icpk plants were isolated with no segregation for BASTA resistance in F3 plants. For demonstrating the embryo lethality in cpk10,30, cpk10, cpk30/+ plants were grown under 16/8 h photoperiod (100 μmol/m2s) at 23/20°C. Siliques were opened using forceps and needles under a dissecting microscope (Leica MZ 16F). Images were acquired and processed using IM software and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe). For obtaining nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts, around 16 to 20 plants were grown on the petri dish (150 mm × 15 mm) containing 100 ml of nitrogen-free 1× MS medium salt, 0.1% MES, 1% sucrose, 0.7% phytoagar, 2.5 mM ammonium succinate and 0.5 mM glutamine, pH 6 under 12/12 h photoperiod (75 μmol/m2s) at 23/20°C for 23–28 days. Mesophyll protoplasts were isolated from the second and the third pair of true leaves following the mesophyll protoplast isolation protocol47. For monitoring plant growth without exogenous nitrogen source after germination, thirty seedlings were germinated and grown on a basal medium16 (10 mM KH2PO4/KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM FeSO4-EDTA, 50 μM H3BO4, 12 μM MnSO4·H2O, 1 μM ZnCl2, 1 μM CuSO4·5H2O, 0.2 μM Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.1% MES and 0.5% sucrose, pH 5.8) with 1 % phytoagar under constant light (150 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for four days. Photos were taken at different days (Day 1 to 4) using a dissecting microscope (Leica MZ 16F) with IM software. For analysing the specific plant growth programs in response to different exogenous nitrogen sources at different concentrations, seedlings were germinated and grown on a basal medium for 4 days as described above, and then transferred to the basal medium with 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 or 10 mM KNO3, NH4Cl, glutamine or KCl for additional 1 to 7 days. For gene expression analyses with RT-qPCR and RNA-Seq, 10 seedlings were germinated in one well of the 6-well tissue culture plate (Falcon) with 1 ml of the basal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM ammonium succinate as the sole nitrogen source. Plates were sealed with parafilm and placed on the shaker at 70 rpm under constant light (45 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for 7 days. Before nitrate induction, seedlings were washed three times with 1 ml basal medium. Seedlings were treated in 1 ml of the basal medium with KCl or KNO3 for 15 min. Seedlings were then harvested for RNA extraction with TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For blocking the kinase activity of CPK10(M141G), seedlings were pre-treated with 10 μM 3MBiP in the basal medium for 2 min and then treated with KCl or KNO3 for 15 min. For the assays with Ca2+ channel blockers and Ca2+ sensor inhibitors, seedlings were pre-treated with 2 mM LaCl3, 2 mM GdCl3, 250 μM W5, or 250 μM W7 in the 1 ml of the basal medium for 20 min, and then induced by 0.5 mM KCl or KNO3 for 15 min. For monitoring root morphology, seedlings were germinated and grown on a basal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM ammonium succinate and 1% phytoagar under constant light (150 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for 3 days. Plants were then transferred to the basal medium supplemented with 1 μM 3MBiP and 5 mM KNO3, 2.5 mM ammonium succinate, 5 mM KCl or 1 mM glutamine and grown for 5 to 8 days. After seedling transfer, 1 ml of 1 μM 3MBiP was added on the medium every two days. For monitoring lateral root developmental stages, seedlings were monitored under a microscope (Leica DM5000B) with a 20× objective lens according to the protocol as described previously44. In order to measure the primary and lateral root length, pictures were taken using a dissecting microscope (Leica MZ 16 F) with IM software and analysed by ImageJ. For comparing the shoot phenotype, 8-day-old seedlings were cut above the root-shoot junction for measuring the shoot fresh weight and acquiring images. To analyse the cpk single mutant phenotype, plants were germinated and grown on the ammonium succinate medium for 3 days and then transferred to basal medium plates supplemented with 5 mM KNO3 for 6 days. For analysing double mutants in response to 3MBiP, plants were transferred to basal medium plate supplemented with 5 mM KNO3 and 1 μM 3MBiP for 6 days, and 3MBiP was reapplied every 2 days. Individual 9-day-old seedling (n=12) was collected for measuring fresh weight and acquiring images. For characterizing the shoot phenotype of nlp7-1 and the complementation lines, around 20 seeds were germinated on the petri dish (150 mm × 15 mm) containing 100 ml of nitrogen-free 1× MS medium salt (Caisson), 0.1% MES, 1% sucrose, 0.7% phytoagar and 25 mM KNO3 medium pH 5.8 under 16/8 h photoperiod (100 μmol/m2s) at 18°C and grown for 21 days. The shoots were collected for measurement of fresh weight and acquisition of images. For analyses of the shoot phenotype in icpk, seeds were germinated and grown on the ammonium succinate basal medium plate for 3 days and then transferred to the same medium supplemented with 1 μM 3MBiP. The inhibitor 3MBiP (5 ml of 1 μM) was reapplied on the medium two more times during the growth.
Aequorin reconstitution and bioluminescence-based quantification of Ca2+ signals in whole seedlings
Two transgenic seedlings expressing apoaequorin26 were germinated and grown in one well of a 12-well tissue culture plate (Falcon) with 0.5 ml of the basal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM ammonium succinate for 6 days. Individual plant was transferred to a luminometer cuvette filled with 100 μl of the reconstitution buffer (2 mM MES pH 5.7, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 μM native coelenterazine from NanoLight Technology) and incubated at room temperature in dark overnight. The emission of photons was detected every sec using the luminometer BD Monolight™ 3010. Injection of 100 μl of 20 mM KCl, 20 mM KNO3, 200 nM flg22 or ultrapure water into the cuvettes initiated the measurement. Luminescence values were exported and processed using Microsoft Excel software.
GCaMP6-based Ca2+ imaging in mesophyll protoplasts and transgenic seedlings
For Ca2+ imaging in protoplasts, mesophyll protoplasts (2 × 105) in 1 ml buffer were co-transfected with 70 μg of HBT-GCaMP6 and 50 μg of HBT-HY5-mCherry plasmid DNA. Transfected protoplasts were incubated in 5 ml of WI buffer46 for 4 h. Before time-lapse recording, a cover glass was placed on a 10-well chamber slide covering ¾ part of a well, and placed on the microscope stage. Mesophyll protoplasts co-expressing GCaMP6 and HY5-mCherry (2 × 104 protoplast cells) were spun down for 1 min at 100×g. WI-Ca2+ buffer (WI buffer with 4 mM CaCl2) (0.5 μl) with different stimuli (40 mM KCl, 40 mM KNO3, or 40 mM NH4Cl) or 80 mM Ca2+ chelator (EGTA) were added into 1.5 μl of concentrated mesophyll protoplasts in WI buffer. The final concentration of each stimulus was 10 mM KCl, 10 mM KNO3, 10 mM NH4Cl or 20 mM EGTA in the solution. The stimulated protoplasts were immediately loaded onto the slide and imaged via the Leica AF software on a Leica DM5000B microscope with the 20× objective lens. The exposure time for GCaMP6 was set at 1 sec and recorded every 2 sec to generate 199 frames. The exposure time was set at 45 millisecond for the bright field and 1 sec for the mCherry signal. The fluorescence intensity was determined with the region of interest (ROI) function for each protoplast. The intensity data were exported and processed using Microsoft Excel software. The images were exported and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. To make a video, individual images were cropped using Adobe Photoshop software and saved in JPEG format. The video was generated using ImageJ with the cropped images. For Ca2+ imaging with the GCaMP6 transgenic seedling cotyledons, 5 seedlings were germinated in one well of a 6-well tissue culture plate (Falcon) with 1 ml of the basal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM ammonium succinate for 7 days. A chamber was made on microscope slides between two strips of the invisible tape (0.5 cm × 3 cm) and filled with 150 μl of the basal medium. A cotyledon of the 7-day-old seedling was cut in half using razor blade and embedded in the medium. A thin layer of cotton was placed on top of the cotyledon to prevent moving. The coverslip was placed on the sample and fixed by another two strips of the invisible tape. The cotyledon was allowed to recover on the slide for 10 min. Confocal imaging was acquired using the Leica laser scanning confocal system (Leica TCS NT confocal microscope, SP1). The mesophyll cells in the cotyledon were targeted for Ca2+ imaging at the focal point. Basal medium (200 μl) with 10 mM KCl, 10 mM KNO3 or 20 mM EGTA was loaded along one edge of the coverslip. A Kimwipes tissue on the opposite edge was used to draw the buffer into the chamber. To record fluorescence images, the excitation was provided at 488 nm and emission images at 515–550 nm were collected. The scanning resolution was set at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels. Images were captured every 10 sec and averaged from two frames. Eighty images total were collected and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. A video was generated with collected images using the method described above. For Ca2+ imaging with the GCaMP6 transgenic seedling at the root tip and the elongated region of roots (around the middle region of the root), ten seedlings were germinated and grown on the tissue culture plate (Falcon) with the basal medium and 1% phytoagar under constant light (150 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for 4 days. The images were obtained using Leica laser scanning confocal system as described above for cotyledon Ca2+ imaging. Thirty three images were collected and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. A video was generated with collected images using the method described above.
Mesophyll protoplast transient expression assays
Time-course, specificity and dosage analyses of NIR-LUC activity in response to nitrate induction was carried out in mesophyll protoplasts (2 × 104 protoplasts in 100 μl) co-transfected with 10 μg NIR-LUC and 2 μg UBQ10-GUS (as the internal control) and incubated in WI buffer46 for 4 h, and then induced by 0.5 mM KCl, KNO3, NH4+ or Gln or different concentrations of KNO3 for 2 h. For time-course analysis, the fold change is calculated relative to the value of KCl treatment at each time point. For nitrate-sensitized functional genomic screen, nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (2 × 104 protoplasts in 100 μl) were co-transfected with 8 μg of HBT-CPKac (constitutively active CPK) or a control vector, 10 μg of NIR-LUC and 2 μg of UBQ10-GUS plasmid DNA, and incubated for 4 h to allow CPKac protein expression. For investigating the functional relationship between CPKac10 and NLP7 in nitrate signalling, nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (4 × 104 protoplasts in 200 μl) were co-transfected with 8 μg of NIR-LUC and 2 μg of UBQ10-GUS plasmid DNA as well as 5 μg of HBT-CPKac10, or HBT-CPKac10KM or a control vector or HBT-NLP7 or HBT-NLP7(S205A) in different combinations supplemented with 5 μg control vector to reach a total 20 μg per transfection reaction, and incubated for 4 h for protein expression. Protoplasts were then induced with 0.5 mM KCl or KNO3 for 2 h. The luciferase assay and GUS assay were carried out as described before46. The expression levels of NLP7-HA and CPK-FLAG/CPK10ac-FLAG in protoplasts were monitored by immunoblot with anti-HA-peroxidase (Roche, #11667475001) (1:2000) and anti-FLAG-HRP (Sigma, A8592) (1:2000) antibodies, respectively.
Protein expression and purification
Expression vectors were transformed into Rosetta™ 2 (DE3) pLysS Competent Cells (Novagen). Cells were induced by 1 mM of IPTG when OD600 reached 0.6, and proteins were expressed at 18°C for 18 h. Affinity purification was carried out using HisTrap columns (GE Healthcare) and ÄKTA FPLC system. Purified proteins were buffer exchanged into PBS using PD-10 Desalting Columns (GE Healthcare), and then concentrated by Amicon Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Unit with Ultracel-10 membrane (EMD Millipore).
In-gel protein kinase assay
Around 106 protoplasts were incubated in WI buffer (5 ml) in petri dishes (9 × 9 cm) for 4 h before induction with 10 mM KCl or KNO3 for 10 min. Protoplasts were harvested and lysed in 200 μl of extraction buffer: 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete mini, Roche) and 1 mM DTT. The protein extract supernatant was obtained after centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Total proteins (20 μg) were loaded on 8% SDS-PAGE embedded with or without 0.5 mg/ml histone type III-S (Sigma) as a general CPK phosphorylation substrate27. The gel was washed 3 times with the washing buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.5 mg/ml BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100), and incubated for 20 h with three changes in the renaturation buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 mM NaF and 0.1 mM Na3VO4) at 4°C. The gel was then incubated in the reaction buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 12 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 1 mM DTT and 0.1 mM Na3VO4) with or without 20 mM EGTA at room temperature for 30 min. The kinase reaction was performed for 1 h in the reaction buffer supplemented with 25 μM cold ATP and 50 μCi [γ-32P]ATP with or without 20 mM EGTA. The reaction was stopped by extensive washes in the washing buffer (5% trichloroacetic acid and 1% sodium pyrophosphate) for 6 h. The protein kinase activity was detected on the dried gel using the Typhoon imaging system (GE Healthcare).
1-Isopropyl-3-(3-methylbenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine (3MBiP) synthesis
3MBiP was synthesized using the same procedures as those for a close structural analog, 3MB-PP142, with comparable yields, except that iso-propylhydrazine was substituted for tert-butylhydrazine.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (s, 1H), 7.00 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.96 (p, J = 6.7 Hz, I H), 4.31 (s, 2H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.44 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.41, 155.78, 153.69, 143.12, 139.56, 137.85, 129.51, 128.79, 127.30, 125.87, 98.92, 48.18, 40.10, 33.70, 22.23, 21.54. ESI-MS calculated for C16H20N5 [M+H]+ is 282.2, found 282.7.
In vitro protein kinase assays
For in vitro kinase assay with CPK10(M141G)-FLAG or CPK10-FLAG, 4 × 104 protoplasts expressing CPK10(M141G)-FLAG or CPK10-FLAG were lysed in 200 μl immunoprecipitation (IP) buffer that contained 50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1 % TritonX-100 and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete mini, Roche). Protein extracts were incubated with 0.5 μg anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma, #F1804) at 4°C for 2 h and additional 1 h with protein G Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare). The immunoprecipitated kinase protein was washed three times with IP buffer and once with kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 15 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM DTT). Kinase reactions were performed for 1 h in 25 μl kinase buffer containing 1 μg of histone (Sigma #H5505 or H4524), 50 μM cold ATP and 2 μCi [γ-32P]ATP. To block the CPK10(M141G)-FLAG kinase activity, 1 μM 3MBiP or DMSO as control was added in the 25 μl kinase buffer for 2 min before performing the kinase reaction. The reaction was stopped by adding SDS-PAGE loading buffer. After separation on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, the protein kinase activity was detected on the dried gel using the Typhoon imaging system. For performing in vitro kinase assay with CPK10(M141G)-HA isolated from icpk10,30 seedlings, twelve 7-day-old seedlings grown in 2 wells of a 6-well-plate with 1 ml medium (0.5× MS, 0.5% sucrose and 0.1% MES pH 5.7) were grounded in liquid nitrogen into powder and lysed in 200 μl of IP buffer. The CPK10(M141G)-HA protein was immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody (Roche, #11666606001) and protein G Sepharose beads. In vitro kinase assay with CPK10(M141G)-HA proteins was carried out as described above. For in vitro kinase assay with the subgroup III CPKs, FLAG-tagged CPK7, 8, 10, 10 KM (K92M, a kinase-dead mutation in the conserved ATP binding domain), 13, 30, and 32 were expressed in 105 protoplasts and purified with 1 μg anti-FLAG antibody conjugated to protein G Sepharose beads as described above. CPK11-FLAG from subgroup I was used as a negative control to demonstrate the specificity of NLP7 as a substrate only for subgroup III CPKs. NLP7-HIS (~1 μg) purified from E. coli or Histone type III-S (2 μg) was used as substrate in the in vitro kinase assay. Kinase reactions were performed for 1 h at 28°C in 25 μl kinase buffer containing 5 μM cold ATP and 6 μCi [γ-32P]ATP, which greatly enhanced the CPK activity. To reduce the background caused by free [γ-32P]ATP in the gel, 50 μM cold ATP was added in the kinase reaction before sample loading in 10% (NLP7-HIS) or 12% (HIS) SDS-PAGE gel. To demonstrate that CPK10, 30, 32 kinase activities were Ca2+ dependent, 4 × 104 (CPK10 or CPK10ac) or 105 (CPK30, 32 or CPKac 30, 32) protoplasts expressing CPKs for 12 h instead of 6 h (to increase the yield of CPK proteins) were lysed in 200 μl (CPK10) or 400 μl (CPK30 or CPK32) of IP buffer. The CPK proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody (0.5 μg for CPK10 or CPKac10, and 2 μg for CPK30, 32 or CPKac 30, 32) conjugated to protein G Sepharose beads. The immunoprecipitated CPKs were washed three times with IP buffer and twice with EGTA-kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 15 mM MgCl2, 15 mM EGTA and 1 mM DTT). Kinase reactions were performed for 1 h at 28°C in 25 μl kinase buffer or EGTA-kinase buffer containing 5 μM cold ATP and 6 μCi [γ-32P]ATP and purified NLP7-HIS (~1 μg), NLP7-N (1-581 a.a.) (~0.8 μg), NLP7-N(S205A) (~0.8 μg), or Histone type III-S (2 μg). After performing kinase reaction, 50 μM cold ATP was added to reduce the background caused by free [γ-32P]ATP. The reaction was stopped by adding SDS-PAGE loading buffer. After separation on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel (Histone type III-S) or 10% (NLP7-HIS or NLP7-N-HIS) SDS-PAGE gel, the protein kinase activity was detected on the dried gel using the Typhoon imaging system. Substrate was stained with InstantBlue Protein Stain (C.B.S. Scientific). The expression levels of CPK or CPKac proteins were monitored by immunoblot with anti-FLAG-HRP (Sigma, A8592) (1:4000) antibody. CPKac proteins without the Ca2+-binding EF-hand domains provided constitutive kinase activities that were insensitive to EGTA. The sensitivity of CPK10, CPK30 and CPK32 to EGTA in kinase assays demonstrated their functions as Ca2+ sensors in nitrate signalling, which was further supported by the lack of NLP7-HA phosphorylation and the nuclear retention of NLP7-GFP in icpk mutant cells. Importantly, NLP7(S205A) lost nitrate-induced phosphorylation, nuclear localization, NIR-LUC activation, and endogenous target gene activation in WT protoplasts and seedlings.
RNA isolation, RT-PCR and RT-qPCR
RNA isolation, RT-PCR and RT-qPCR were carried out as described previously16. The primers used for RT-PCR and RT-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 5. The TUBULIN 4 (TUB4) was used as a control in wild type and cpk mutants. The relative gene expression was normalized to the expression of UBQ10. Triplicate biological samples were analysed with consistent results.
RNA-Seq analyses
We chose the early time point to minimize secondary target genes and the complexity that negative feedback would have introduced, including indirect effects from assimilation of nitrate and the subsequent activation of transcriptional repressors1,4,12,13,15,18. Seven-day-old seedlings of wild type and icpk were pretreated with 10 μM 3MBiP for 2 min and then treated for 15 min with either 10 mM KCl or 10 mM KNO3. Total RNA (0.5 μg) was used for preparing the library with the Illumina TruSeq RNA sample Prep Kit v2 according to the manufacture’s guidelines with 9 different barcodes (triplicate biological samples). The libraries were sequenced for 50 cycles on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 rapid mode using two lanes of a flow cell. The sequencing was performed at MGH Next Generation Sequencing Core facility (Boston, USA). Fastq files, downloaded from the core facility, were used for data analysis. The quality of each sequencing library was assessed by examining fastq files with FastQC. Reads in the fastq file were first aligned to the Arabidopsis genome, TAIR10, using Tophat52. HTSeq53 was used to determine the reads per gene. Finally, DESeq254 analysis was performed to determine differential expression55. For HTSeq normalized counts in each sample, differentially expressed genes were determined for WT KNO3 vs. WT KCl and icpk KNO3 vs. WT KNO3. The differential expression analysis in DESeq2 uses a generalized linear model of the form
where counts Kij for gene i, sample j are modeled using a Negative Binomial distribution with fitted mean μij and a gene-specific dispersion parameter αi. The fitted mean is composed of a sample-specific size factor sj and a parameter qij proportional to the expected true concentration of fragments for sample j. The coefficients βi give the log2 fold changes for gene i for each column of the model matrix X. Results were imported into Microsoft Excel for filtering. In order to generate a list to minimize false positives of primary nitrate responsive genes in WT, we applied a relatively high stringency, q-value ≤ 0.05 cut-off, followed by a log2 ≤-1 or ≥1 cut-off.
To generate a heatmap, we performed agglomerative hierarchical clustering on genes with Gene Cluster 3.056 using Correlation (uncentered) as the similarity metric and single linkage as the clustering method. Java Treeview57 was used to visualize the results of the clustering. To obtain a list of enriched gene functions, we used the Classification SuperViewer Tool on the BAR website (http://bar.utoronto.ca/ntools/cgi-bin/ntools_classification_superviewer.cgi) with the MapMan classification source option. Analyses of enriched functional categories with nitrate up-regulated and down-regulated genes were performed using the MapMan classification source option on the Classification SuperViewer Tool with manual annotation based on literature. The fold enrichment is calculated as follows: (Number in Classinput_set/Number of totalinput_set)/ (Number in Classreference_set/ Number of totalreference_set). The p-value is calculated in Excel using a hypergeometric distribution test. The data in Extended Data Fig. 4c and 4d were sorted by fold enrichment with a p-value < 0.05 cutoff. For the biological duplicate RNA-Seq experiments for identifying NLP7 target genes in the mesophyll protoplast transient expression system, 500 μg of HBT-NLP7-HA, HBT-NLP7(S205A)-HA or control plasmid DNA was transfected into 106 protoplasts and incubated for 4.5 h. Total RNA (0.5 μg) was used to construct the libraries with 6 different barcodes (biological duplicate samples) as described above. The sequencing result was performed and analysed as described above. Differentially expressed genes were determined with DESeq2 on NLP7 vs. Ctl (Control) and NLP7(S205A) vs. Ctl. Results were imported into Microsoft Excel for filtering (log2 ≥1 cut-off) and generating heatmaps.
Immunoblot analyses of nitrate-induced phosphorylation of NLP6 and NLP7 in vivo
Transgenic seedlings expressing NLP6-MYC or NLP7-MYC were germinated and grown in basal medium containing 0.5 mM ammonium succinate as a sole nitrogen source (0.01% MES-KOH, pH 5.7) for 4 days at 23°C under continuous light (60 μmol/m2s). After replacement with fresh medium supplemented with 10 mM KCl or KNO3, the seedlings were collected after incubation for 5, 10 or 30 min. For examining the effects of Ca2+ channel blockers and Ca2+ sensors inhibitors, the 4 day-old seedlings were placed in fresh basal medium supplemented with 2 mM LaCl3, 2 mM GdCl3, 250 μM W5 or 250 μM W7 for 20 min and induced by 10 mM KCl or KNO3. The seedlings were weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground using a Multibeads Shocker (Yasui Kikai, Osaka, Japan). The ground samples were suspended in 20 volume of 1× Laemmli sample buffer supplemented with twice the concentration of EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and heated at 95°C for 30 sec. Samples were then spun down and the supernatant was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-MYC (Millipore, #05-419) (1:1000) and anti-Histone H3 (Abcam, #ab1791) (1:5000) antibodies. For calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIP) treatment, proteins in 1.2-fold CIP buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 120 mM NaCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM DTT, 2.4-fold concentration of EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) were mixed with CIP solution (New England Biolabs, M0290, 10 U/μl) in a ratio of 5 (CIP buffer): 1 (CIP solution) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. For a control treatment, heat-inactivated CIP was mixed. The reactions were stopped by adding an equal volume of 2× Laemmli sample buffer and heating at 95°C for 30 sec. To demonstrate that nitrate-induced NLP7 phosphorylation was abolished in icpk by protein mobility shift in SDS-PAGE, 4 × 104 protoplasts isolated from wild type or icpk were transfected with 20 μg of NLP7-HA or NLP7-S205A-HA. To block CPK10(M141G) activity in icpk, 10 μM 3MBiP was added in the incubation buffer (WI) after transfection. After expressing protein for 4.5 h, protoplasts were then induced by 10 mM KCl or KNO3 for 15 min. Protoplasts were spun down and re-suspended in 40 μl 1× Laemmli sample buffer. Samples (10 μl) were separated in a 6% SDS-PAGE resolving gel without a stacking gel layer. After transferring proteins to the PVDF membrane, the NLP7 (WT and S205A) proteins were detected with anti-HA-peroxidase (Roche, #11667475001) (1:2000). RuBisCo was detected by an anti-Rubisco antibody (Sigma, GW23153) (1:5000) as a loading control.
Detection of the serine 205 phosphorylation in NLP7 in vivo
Transformation of T87 cell suspension culture derived from a seedling of Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Heynh.) ecotype Columbia58 was conducted with the 35SΩ-NLP7-MYC construct in the pCB302 binary plasmid carrying the hygromycin B selection marker gene. Transformants mediated by Agrobacterium (GV3101) were selected on agar plates (JPL medium, 3 g/L gellun gum, 500 mg/L carbenicillin and 20 mg/L hygromycin), and the transformants were maintained in liquid JPL medium as described previously58. T87 cells expressing NLP7-MYC were incubated in nitrogen free-JPL liquid medium for 2 days, and then 10 mM KNO3 was added into the medium. After 30 min treatment, the T87 cells (approximately 4 g F.W.) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized with Multi-beads Shocker (Yasui Kikai, Osaka, Japan) in 10 mL of the buffer that contained 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1× Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and 1× PhosSTOP (Roche). Cell lysates obtained were incubated with anti-MYC antibodies crosslinked to Dynabeads (Invitrogen). Trapped proteins were eluted by 1× Laemmli sample buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE. Gel pieces containing NLP7-MYC were recovered and subjected to in-gel double digestion with trypsin (10 ng/μl) and chymotrypsin (10 ng/μl) (Promega, Madison, WI). NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis was performed as described previously59,60 with minor modifications.
NLP7, CPK10, CPK30, and CPK32 nuclear localization analyses
For analysing NLP7 nuclear retention triggered by nitrate in protoplasts, nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (4 × 104 protoplasts in 200 μl) were co-transfected with 20 μg of NLP7-GFP or NLP7(S205A)-GFP and 10 μg of HBT-HY5-mCherry plasmid DNA and incubated for 6 h. Mesophyll protoplasts were spun down for 1 min at 100×g. WI buffer with 10 mM KCl or KNO3 was added into mesophyll protoplasts for 30 min. The treated protoplasts were loaded onto slides and imaged with the 20× objective lens on a Leica DM5000B microscope operated with the Leica AF software. The images were collected and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. For analysing NLP7-GFP nuclear retention triggered by nitrate in transgenic lines, NLP7-GFP/nlp7-1 and NLP7(S205A)-GFP/nlp7-1 seedlings were germinated and grown on the basal medium supplemented with 2.5 mM ammonium succinate and with 1 % phytoagar under constant light (150 μmol/m2s) at 23°C for 5 days. Plants were placed on the slide as described above and stimulated by 10 mM KNO3. Confocal images were acquired as described for GCaMP6-based Ca2+ imaging in transgenic seedlings. For analysing CPK10, CPK30 and CPK32 nuclear localization in response to nitrate, nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (4 × 104 protoplasts in 200 μl) were co-transfected with 20 μg of CPK10-GFP or CPK30-GFP or CPK32-GFP and 10 μg of HBT-HY5-mCherry plasmid DNA and incubated for 12 h. Protoplasts were then treated with 10 mM KNO3 for 5 min. Confocal imaging was acquired using the Leica Application Suite X software on a Leica TCS SP8 (Leica) confocal microscope with the 40× objective lens. To obtain fluorescence images, the excitation was set at 489 nm (GFP) and 587 nm (mCherry), and emission images at 508 nm (GFP) and 610 nm (mCherry) were collected. The scanning resolution was set at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels. The images were collected and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. For analysing NLP7-GFP nuclear retention in wild type and icpk, nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (4 × 104 protoplasts in 200 μl) were co-transfected with 20 μg of NLP7-GFP and 4 μg of HBT-Td-Tomato plasmid DNA and incubated for 12-16 h. The transfected protoplasts were treated with inhibitor 10 μM 3MBiP 30 min before nitrate induction. Protoplasts were treated with 10 mM KNO3 for 15 min in the presence of 10 μM 3MBiP of WI buffer. The images were acquired as described above for the NLP7 nuclear retention in protoplasts.
BiFC assay
Nitrate-free mesophyll protoplasts (4 × 104 protoplasts in 200 μl) were co-transfected with 18 μg of UBQ10-CPK10KM-YN, UBQ10-NLP7-YC, and 4 μg of HBT-HY5-mCherry plasmid DNA, and incubated for 12-18 h. Protoplasts were then treated with 10 mM KNO3 for 2 h. Confocal images were acquired as described above for CPK localization in response to nitrate.
Statistical analysis
The chosen sample sizes for all experiments were empirically determined by measuring the mean and standard deviation for the sample population in pilot experiments, and then calculated (the 1-Sample Z-test method, two-sided test) with the aim to obtain the expected mean of less than 25% significant difference with the alpha value ≤ 0.05 and the power of the test ≥ 0.80. For multiple comparisons, data were first subjected to one-way or two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to determine statistical significance. To compare two groups, Student’s t-test was used instead. To compare WT and icpk lateral root development, data were categorized into two groups, and then subjected to Chi-square test, as indicated in the figure legends.
Data Availability
RNA-seq data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE73437. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Asai for the pNLP7-NLP7-GFP and pNLP7-NLP7(S205A)-GFP constructs, X.Y. Liu and R.Q. Ye for the pUBQ10-NLS-TdTomato construct, X.C. Zhang and M.R. Knight for the aequorin transgenic line, J. Bush for expert management of the plant facilities, Q. Hall for advice on embryo analysis, ABRC, NASC and the Salk Institute for T-DNA insertion lines, K. Holton and H. Lee for advice on statistic analyses, and L. Shi, J. Bush and A. Diener for comments. K.M.S. thanks F. Rutaganira for help with characterization of 3MBiP. The Research is supported by the NIH, NSF and WJC Special Project (PJ009106) RDA-Korea to J.S., and by CREST, JST and JSPS KAKENHI grants 25252014/26221103 to S.Y. and 15H05616 to M.K., and the NSFC grant 31670246 to K.L.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
K.L., Y.N., J.S., and S.Y. conceived and initiated the project, designed the experiments, K.L., Y.N., M.K., Y.W. H.D., H.S.C., L.L., M.B. and J.S. performed experiments. M.M., Y.N., and H.S.C. performed bioinformatics. S.M. and T.I. conducted LC/MS/MS analysis. C.Z. and S.K. provided 3MBiP and suggestions. J.S., K.L., Y.N., S.Y. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Author Information
All RNA-seq data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE73437.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Wang R, Okamoto M, Xing X, Crawford NM. Microarray analysis of the nitrate response in Arabidopsis roots and shoots reveals over 1,000 rapidly responding genes and new linkages to glucose, trehalose-6-phosphate, iron, and sulfate metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:556–67. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.021253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sheen J. Master regulators in plant glucose signaling networks. J Plant Biol. 2014;57:67–79. doi: 10.1007/s12374-014-0902-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scheible WR, et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2483–99. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.047019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, Stitt M. Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Mol Plant. 2010;3:973–96. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xiong Y, et al. Glucose-TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature. 2013;496:181–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kiba T, Krapp A. Plant nitrogen acquisition under low availability: regulation of uptake and root architecture. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57:707–14. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Efeyan A, Comb WC, Sabatini DM. Nutrient-sensing mechanisms and pathways. Nature. 2015;517:302–10. doi: 10.1038/nature14190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rebsamen M, et al. SLC38A9 is a component of the lysosomal amino acid sensing machinery that controls mTORC1. Nature. 2015;519:477–81. doi: 10.1038/nature14107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bouguyon E, et al. Multiple mechanisms of nitrate sensing by Arabidopsis nitrate transceptor NRT1.1. Nature Plants. 2015;1:15015. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ho CH, Lin SH, Hu HC, Tsay YF. CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2009;138:1184–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang R, Xing X, Wang Y, Tran A, Crawford NM. A genetic screen for nitrate regulatory mutants captures the nitrate transporter gene NRT1.1. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:472–8. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.140434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Konishi M, Yanagisawa S. Emergence of a new step towards understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying nitrate-regulated gene expression. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5589–600. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang R, et al. Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2512–22. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.044610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Castaings L, et al. The nodule inception-like protein 7 modulates nitrate sensing and metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;57:426–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krouk G, Mirowski P, LeCun Y, Shasha DE, Coruzzi GM. Predictive network modeling of the high-resolution dynamic plant transcriptome in response to nitrate. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R123. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu KH, McCormack M, Sheen J. Targeted parallel sequencing of large genetically-defined genomic regions for identifying mutations in Arabidopsis. Plant Methods. 2012;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-8-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Konishi M, Yanagisawa S. Arabidopsis NIN-like transcription factors have a central role in nitrate signalling. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1617. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marchive C, et al. Nuclear retention of the transcription factor NLP7 orchestrates the early response to nitrate in plants. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1713. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guan P, et al. Nitrate foraging by Arabidopsis roots is mediated by the transcription factor TCP20 through the systemic signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:15267–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411375111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alvarez JM, et al. Systems approach identifies TGA1 and TGA4 transcription factors as important regulatory components of the nitrate response of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant J. 2014;80:1–13. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Obertello M, Shrivastava S, Katari MS, Coruzzi GM. Cross-species network analysis uncovers conserved nitrogen-regulated network modules in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015;168:1830–43. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.255877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hu HC, Wang YY, Tsay YF. AtCIPK8, a CBL-interacting protein kinase, regulates the low-affinity phase of the primary nitrate response. Plant J. 2009;57:264–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leran S, et al. Nitrate sensing and uptake in Arabidopsis are enhanced by ABI2, a phosphatase inactivated by the stress hormone abscisic acid. Sci Signal. 2015;8:ra43. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa4829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Medici A, et al. AtNIGT1/HRS1 integrates nitrate and phosphate signals at the Arabidopsis root tip. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6274. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vidal EA, Alvarez JM, Moyano TC, Gutierrez RA. Transcriptional networks in the nitrate response of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;27:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Knight H, Trewavas AJ, Knight MR. Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involves two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell. 1996;8:489–503. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boudsocq M, et al. Differential innate immune signalling via Ca2+ sensor protein kinases. Nature. 2010;464:418–22. doi: 10.1038/nature08794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boudsocq M, Sheen J. CDPKs in immune and stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Reddy AS, Ali GS, Celesnik H, Day IS. Coping with stresses: roles of calcium- and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2010–32. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Simeunovic A, Mair A, Wurzinger B, Teige M. Know where your clients are: subcellular localization and targets of calcium-dependent protein kinases. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:3855–72. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ebert DH, Greenberg ME. Activity-dependent neuronal signalling and autism spectrum disorder. Nature. 2013;493:327–37. doi: 10.1038/nature11860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sakakibara H, Kobayashi K, Deji A, Sugiyama T. Partial characterization of the signaling pathway for the nitrate-dependent expression of genes for nitrogen-assimilatory enzymes using detached maize leaves. Plant and Cell Physiology. 1997;38:837–843. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Riveras E, et al. The calcium ion is a second messenger in the nitrate signaling pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:1397–404. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Forde BG. Glutamate signalling in roots. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:779–87. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Giehl RF, Gruber BD, von Wiren N. It’s time to make changes: modulation of root system architecture by nutrient signals. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:769–78. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen TW, et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013;499:295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yuan F, et al. OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2014;514:367–71. doi: 10.1038/nature13593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Charpentier M, et al. Nuclear-localized cyclic nucleotide-gated channels mediate symbiotic calcium oscillations. Science. 2016;352:1102–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aae0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brandt B, et al. Calcium specificity signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis guard cells. Elife. 2015;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.03599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gan Y, Bernreiter A, Filleur S, Abram B, Forde BG. Overexpressing the ANR1 MADS-box gene in transgenic plants provides new insights into its role in the nitrate regulation of root development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:1003–16. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu Y, et al. Structural basis for selective inhibition of Src family kinases by PP1. Chem Biol. 1999;6:671–8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang C, et al. Structure-guided inhibitor design expands the scope of analog-sensitive kinase technology. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:1931–8. doi: 10.1021/cb400376p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kiba T, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H. Side-chain modification of cytokinins controls shoot growth in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2013;27:452–61. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Malamy JE, Benfey PN. Organization and cell differentiation in lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1997;124:33–44. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen TW, et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013;499:295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1565–72. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xiang C, Han P, Lutziger I, Wang K, Oliver DJ. A mini binary vector series for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40:711–7. doi: 10.1023/a:1006201910593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Guo J, et al. Involvement of Arabidopsis RACK1 in protein translation and its regulation by abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:370–83. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kato Y, Konishi M, Shigyo M, Yoneyama T, Yanagisawa S. Characterization of plant eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 (eIF6) genes: The essential role in embryogenesis and their differential expression in Arabidopsis and rice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;397:673–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alonso JM, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301:653–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1086391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim D, et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Van Verk MC, Hickman R, Pieterse CM, Van Wees SC. RNA-Seq: revelation of the messengers. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:175–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.De Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1453–4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Saldanha AJ. Java Treeview–extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3246–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Axelos M, Curic C, Mazzolini L, Bardet C, Lescure N. A protocol for transient gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts isolated from cell suspension cultures. Plant Physi Bioch. 1992;30:123–128. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Aki T, Shigyo M, Nakano R, Yoneyama T, Yanagisawa S. Nano scale proteomics revealed the presence of regulatory proteins including three FT-Like proteins in phloem and xylem saps from rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:767–90. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Aki T, Yanagisawa S. Application of rice nuclear proteome analysis to the identification of evolutionarily conserved and glucose-responsive nuclear proteins. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:3912–24. doi: 10.1021/pr900187e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Baena-Gonzalez E, Rolland F, Thevelein JM, Sheen J. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature. 2007;448:938–42. doi: 10.1038/nature06069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cheng SH, Willmann MR, Chen HC, Sheen J. Calcium signaling through protein kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:469–85. doi: 10.1104/pp.005645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Curran A, et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinases from Arabidopsis show substrate specificity differences in an analysis of 103 substrates. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2:36. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Song C, et al. Systematic analysis of protein phosphorylation networks from phosphoproteomic data. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:1070–83. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.012625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yaffe MB, et al. A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:348–53. doi: 10.1038/86737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Soyano T, Shimoda Y, Hayashi M. NODULE INCEPTION antagonistically regulates gene expression with nitrate in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:368–76. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Suzuki W, Konishi M, Yanagisawa S. The evolutionary events necessary for the emergence of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes may involve a loss of nitrate responsiveness of the NIN transcription factor. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8 doi: 10.4161/psb.25975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.O’Malley RC, et al. Cistrome and epicistrome features shape the regulatory DNA landscape. Cell. 2016;165:1280–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE73437. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.