Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Aug 19;35(10):1251–1256. doi: 10.1086/678060

Prevalence of Nasal Colonization and Strain Concordance in Patients with Community-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections

Michael W Ellis 1, Carey D Schlett 2, Eugene V Millar 2, Katrina B Crawford 2, Tianyuan Cui 2, Jeffrey B Lanier 3, David R Tribble 2
PMCID: PMC5824647  NIHMSID: NIHMS943001  PMID: 25203178

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine the prevalence and relatedness of Staphylococcus aureus anterior nares colonization in individuals with community-associated staphylococcal skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI).

DESIGN

Observational cohort.

SETTING

US Army soldiers undergoing infantry training.

PARTICIPANTS

Trainees who developed SSTI from May 2010 to January 2012.

METHODS

Participants underwent anterior nares culture at the time of presentation for purulent SSTI. We determined the prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization and strain relatedness between colonizing and clinical isolates with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

RESULTS

We enrolled 1,203 SSTI participants, of whom 508 had culture-confirmed S. aureus SSTI. Overall, 70% (357/508) were colonized with S. aureus. Phenotypically, concordant colonization was more common with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 56%; 122/218) than methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) SSTI (41%; 118/290; P < .01). With PFGE, 48% (121 of 254) of clinical-colonizing pairs were indistinguishable, and concordant colonization was more common with MRSA (53%; 92/173) than MSSA SSTI (36%; 29/81; P < .01). Restricting analysis to concomitant MRSA-MRSA or MSSA-MSSA pairs, 92% (92/100) of MRSA SSTI were indistinguishable, and 40% (29/72) MSSA SSTI were indistinguishable (P < .01). All 92 MRSA pairs were USA300.

CONCLUSIONS

On the phenotypic level, concordant anterior nares colonization with incident staphylococcal SSTI is more common in MSSA than MRSA; however, the opposite is observed when accounting for molecular typing, and MRSA SSTI displays greater concordance. USA300 was responsible for strain concordance with MRSA SSTI. Studies are needed to examine the roles of nasal and extra-nasal carriage, colonization preceding infection, and increased virulence in the pathogenesis of MRSA SSTI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01105767.


Over the past decade, skin and soft-tissue infections in the United States, especially those caused by USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have emerged as a significant community health threat.1 Although these infections are widespread within the general community, military trainees are at particularly high risk for MRSA SSTI.2,3

The epidemiology and pathogenesis of community-associated S. aureus SSTI is complex and incompletely understood, especially with regard to the role of nasal colonization. Colonization has often been considered the first step in the S. aureus pathogenesis and has often been the target of prevention strategies.47 Although nasal colonization with S. aureus, including MRSA,8,9 increases risk for subsequent infections, colonization may not be present, even in outbreak settings.10,11 With S. aureus bloodstream infections, there is good genotypic concordance between nasal and infecting isolates;12 however, this relationship has not been clearly demonstrated in adults with MRSA SSTI.13 Determining the role of nasal colonization in S. aureus SSTI is essential for informing prevention strategies.

From May 2010 to January 2012, we conducted a prospective field-based, cluster-randomized trial at Fort Benning, Georgia, in which participants were assigned 1 of 3 hygiene- and education-based regimens aimed at preventing SSTI.14 One group was offered once-weekly showering with chlorhexidine antiseptic body wash as part of the intervention. Overall, this investigation demonstrated no decrease in SSTI or MRSA SSTI. For the current study, we hypothesized that the contribution of nasal colonization with MRSA SSTI is distinct from that of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) SSTI. As a predesignated secondary objective, we determined the prevalence of concordant MRSA or MSSA nasal colonization in participants with S. aureus SSTI. Additionally, we determined the strain relatedness of isolates simultaneously colonizing and infecting individuals using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and determined the presence of resistance and virulence determinants.

METHODS

Study participants and study design

In the setting of a prospective, field-based, cluster-randomized trial,14 we conducted an observational cohort study in participants with SSTI to determine the prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization, strain relatedness with clinical isolates, and potential risk factors. Study participants were US Army soldiers undergoing 14-week infantry training at Fort Benning, Georgia. This population was all male and in generally good physical condition. The Uniformed Services University infectious diseases institutional review board approved the investigation.

Enrollment and data collection

Infantry trainees who presented with SSTI at either the Troop Medical Clinic (TMC) or the hospital were eligible. After informed consent, participants completed a risk factor questionnaire and underwent anterior nares screening culture (BD BBL CultureSwabs; BD Diagnostic). Study personnel abstracted pertinent study-related SSTI data. Healthcare providers obtained cultures of purulent material when clinically indicated.

We defined an SSTI case patient as a trainee who had anterior nares culture performed within 3 days of initial presentation to the TMC or hospital with 1 of the following: cellulitis, abscess, folliculitis, impetigo, paronychia, or infected blister. We defined MRSA SSTI or MSSA SSTI as an SSTI with a MRSA- or MSSA-positive culture from the corresponding clinical site.

Microbiological and molecular analysis

Anterior nares specimens were placed in 5 mL of tryptic soy broth supplemented with 6.5% NaCl (BBL; BD Diagnostic) and were incubated for 18–24 hours at 37°C. After incubation, an aliquot of broth was plated onto mannitol salt agar. Mannitol fermenting colonies were isolated and plated onto trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep’s blood and incubated overnight. Clinical and colonizing S. aureus isolates were identified according to standard protocols. All S. aureus isolates underwent identification and susceptibility testing using Microscan Walk-Away-96 (Dade Behring) according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods.15 We performed PFGE using SmaI (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as a restriction endonuclease on all available MRSA isolates.16 PFGE findings were resolved and analyzed using BioNumerics (Applied Math) and grouped into pulsed-field types (PFTs) using Dice coefficients and 80% similarity as previously described.17 We used a standard method to define paired isolates as indistinguishable.18 MRSA isolates underwent polymerase chain reaction in duplicate to confirm mecA and to assign SCCmec type to assess for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL),19,20 and arcA.21

Statistical methods

Differences in proportions were evaluated by χ2 or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Medians for age were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Two sample t test was used to analyze other continuous variables. All tests of significance were 2-tailed. A P value of less than or equal to .05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Study population

The study population comprised 30,209 all male trainees, and during the investigation, 1,203 trainees (4%) developed SSTI and enrolled in the study. Among these participants, 508 (42%) had culture-confirmed S. aureus SSTI cases, including 290 (57%) with MRSA SSTI and 218 (43%) with MSSA SSTI. The demographic characteristics of participants with either MRSA or MSSA SSTI were similar (Table 1). With regard to clinical manifestation, participants with MRSA had more abscesses (P < .01), and participants with MSSA had more purulent cellulitis (P = .02; Table 1). SSTI risk factors were similar between participants with MRSA and those with MSSA, but the latter were more likely to report a recent contact with a person with SSTI or MRSA infection (P < .01; Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft-Tissue Infection (SSTI)

Variable MRSA SSTI
(n = 290)
MRSA SSTI
(n = 218)
P
Race/ethnicitya 114   92
 White, non-Hispanic   91 (80)   77 (84) .58
 Hispanic   12 (11)   10 (11)
 Black, non-Hispanic     7 (6)     2 (2)
 Other, non-Hispanic     4 (4)     3 (3)
Age, median (range), years   19 (17–37)   19 (17–33) .19
Study group assignment
 Standard   74 (26)   43 (20) .12
 Enhanced standard 129 (45)   81 (37) .10
 Chlorhexidine   87 (30)   94 (43) <.01
Clinical infection
 Abscess 141 (49)   65 (30) <.01
 Cellulitis   61 (21)   65 (30) .02
 More than 1 infection   74 (26)   44 (20) .16
 Folliculitis     9 (3)     7 (3) .95
 Infected blister     4 (1)   17 (8) <.01
 Impetigo     1 (0.3)     9 (4) <.01
 Paronychia     0 (0.0)   11 (5) <.01
Site of infection
 Lower extremity 143 (49) 148 (68) <.01
 Upper extremity   93 (32)   47 (22) <.01
 More than 1 site   17 (6)   10 (5) .53
 Head   15 (5)     6 (3) .18
 Thorax   13 (5)     2 (1) .03
 Groin/inguinal/perineal     9 (3)     5 (2) .58
Time from training start to S. aureus SSTI, mean (range), days   46 (3–101)   44 (1–96) .43

NOTE. Data are no. (%) of participants, unless otherwise indicated. MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.

a

Race and ethnicity data were not collected for all participants.

TABLE 2.

Risk Factors for Skin and Soft-Tissue Infection (SSTI)

Variable MRSA SSTI
(n = 290)
MSSA SSTI
(n = 218)
P
Within the past year
 Admitted to a hospital   14 (6)   6 (3) .26
 Worked at a hospital or nursing home     7 (3)   6 (3) .76
 Lived with someone admitted to/worked in a hospital/nursing home   51 (21) 35 (20) .78
 Known or suspected SSTI/MRSA infection   25 (10) 12 (7) .22
 Prescribed an antibiotic in the past 6 months   59 (24) 30 (17) .07
 Contact with a person with a skin infection/MRSA infectiona   14 (6)   6 (3) .26
Since arriving at Fort Benning
 Personal history of a skin infection/MRSA infection   35 (14) 21 (12) .46
 Had contact with a person with a skin infection/MRSA infection 111 (46) 58 (33) <.01

NOTE. Data are no. (%) of participants, unless otherwise indicated. MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.

a

In the previous 3 months before arrival.

Colonization and concordance

Nasal cultures were obtained on the same day or within 1 day of SSTI presentation in 92% (466 of 508) and within 3 days for only 3% (15 of 508). Only 3 of 508 participants had received antimicrobials before nasal culture was obtained. Overall, 357 of 508 participants (70%) with S. aureus SSTI had concomitant S. aureus nasal colonization (Table 3). With regard to concomitant colonization, there were significant differences between participants with MRSA and MSSA SSTI. Of the 290 participants with MRSA SSTI, 118 (41%) were simultaneously colonized with MRSA; and of the 218 participants with MSSA SSTI, 122 (56%) were simultaneously colonized with MSSA (P < .01). With regard to phenotypic discordant colonization, 32% (92 of 290) of participants with MRSA SSTI had simultaneous MSSA nasal colonization, and 12% (25 of 218) of participants with MSSA SSTI had simultaneous MRSA nasal colonization. The distributions of phenotypic concordance did not differ when stratified by those who were in study groups (data not shown).

TABLE 3.

Phenotypic Strain Concordance between Nasal and Wound Cultures

Wound culture
Nasal culture MSSA SSTI
(n = 290)
MRSA SSTI
(n = 218)
Total Staphylococcus aureus SSTI
(n = 508)
MRSA 118 (41)a   25 (12) 143 (28)
MSSA   92 (32) 122 (56)a 214 (42)
No S. aureus   80 (28)   71 (33) 151 (30)

NOTE. Data are no. (%) of participants, unless otherwise indicated. MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; SSTI, skin and soft-tissue infection.

a

For difference between MRSA-MRSA and MSSA-MSSA concordance P < .01.

Molecular analysis for strain concordance

Of the 508 participants with S. aureus SSTI, 254 participants had paired clinical and colonizing S. aureus isolates available for PFGE. These participants were similar to and representative of the entire SSTI group (data not shown). Overall, 48% (121 of 254) of S. aureus pairs were indistinguishable (Table 4). The predominant PFT of the 121 indistinguishable pairs was USA300 (100 of 121). Of those participants with MRSA SSTI, 53% (92 of 173) had indistinguishable pairs, and among those with MSSA SSTI, 36% (29 of 81) had indistinguishable pairs (P < .01). When restricting analysis to concomitant MRSA-MRSA or MSSA-MSSA pairs, 92% (92 of 100) of MRSA SSTI pairs were indistinguishable, and 40% (29 of 72) of MSSA SSTI pairs were indistinguishable (P < .01). All 92 MRSA indistinguishable pairs were USA300, and 28% (8 of 29) of MSSA pairs were USA300. Of the 8 participants with MRSA-MRSA pairs that were not indistinguishable, 5 were colonized with non-USA300 isolates (2 with USA800, 2 with USA100, 1 with no PFT) but had USA300 clinical isolates, and 3 were colonized with USA300 but had non-USA300 clinical isolates (2 with USA 800, 1 with no PFT). All USA300 MRSA strains were SCCmec type IV, arcA positive, and PVL positive. The distributions of strain relatedness did not differ when stratified by study group (data not shown).

TABLE 4.

Molecular Strain Concordance between Nasal and Wound Cultures

Wound culture
Nasal culture MSSA SSTI
(n = 173)
MRSA SSTI
(n = 81)
Total Staphylococcus aureus SSTI
(n = 254)
Indistinguishable   92 (53)a   29 (36)a 121 (48)
Not indistinguishable 81 (47) 52 (64) 133 (52)

NOTE. Data are no. (%) of participants with clinical infection and isolates available for molecular analysis, unless otherwise indicated. MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; SSTI, skin and soft-tissue infection.

a

P < .01 for difference between MRSA and MSSA concordance.

DISCUSSION

In this investigation, we made several observations that help elucidate the role of nasal colonization in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal SSTI and may help inform future prevention strategies. On the phenotypic level (ie, with respect to methicillin susceptibility), concordant nasal colonization was more common with MSSA SSTI than with MRSA SSTI (56% vs 41%); however, the opposite was observed with molecular typing, and MRSA concordance was more common than MSSA concordance (53% vs 36%). Moreover, USA300 MRSA was the clone responsible for this concordance.

Among participants with MRSA SSTI, we found that only 118 (41%) of 290 had MRSA colonization. This colonization rate is higher than what has been observed by some investigators who have noted rates ranging from 7% to 34%.10,13,22,23 On the other hand, our rate is lower than those reported among hospitalized patients with MRSA SSTI (55%)24,25 In contrast with adults, pediatric patients appear to have a higher prevalence of concordant MRSA colonization, with Fritz et al26 reporting a 76% colonization rate.

We noted that over half (53%) of participants had discordant nasal and clinical cultures based on susceptibility. We found that 12% of participants with MSSA SSTI had MRSA colonization and that 32% of participants with MRSA SSTI had MSSA colonization. This falls within rates reported by others, which have ranged from 52% to 67%.10,23

The role of S. aureus nasal colonization appears to vary considerably between patient populations and disease manifestations.8,9,28 Among hospitalized patients with primarily invasive (eg, bloodstream) infections, strain relatedness between nasal and clinical isolates occurs in approximately 80% of cases.12,25,29 For unknown reasons, this colonizing-infecting strain relatedness does not seem to bear out with SSTI. In our study, we observed that only 48% of patients (121 of 254) with S. aureus SSTI had a nasal strain indistinguishable from their clinical strain. In small community-based investigations of SSTI, the prevalence of strain relatedness has been reported to be as high as 100%,23 whereas in a larger study by Miller et al,13 only 12% of patients (41 of 350) with S. aureus SSTI had a concordant strain at any anatomic site. Among pediatric patients with SSTI, strain concordance appears to be generally higher than it is among adults, with Chen et al10 reporting a rate of 59%. These observed differences may reflect the varying importance of colonization,26,29 strain virulence,1 or perhaps an indirect measure of fomites or person-to-person spread.27

Patients may be colonized with several strains of S. aureus,13,30 and not all strains share the same pathogenic potential. When we limited analysis to MRSA-MRSA or MSSA-MSSA pairs, MRSA strain relatedness was significantly more common than MSSA strain relatedness (92% vs 40%). Moreover, all of these MRSA strains were USA300, which is the predominant clone in the United States.1

There are several limitations to our study. First, this investigation was a secondary objective of a trial which employed weekly chlorhexidine for SSTI prevention.14 Nevertheless, the distributions of phenotypic concordance and strain relatedness did not differ when stratified by those who were in study groups randomized to receive chlorhexidine versus those who were not. Second, due to study-population constraints, we sampled only the anterior nares. Third, the observed results are based on laboratory culture of specimens that were subjected to broth enrichment; it is not known whether laboratory findings are an accurate representation of nasal ecology.

Our findings reinforce that nasal colonization does not appear to be a requirement for community-associated S. aureus SSTI and that other anatomic sites, person-to-person spread, and/or fomites are likely important factors. It also suggests that, although USA300 MRSA colonization with MRSA SSTI is relatively uncommon, when it does occur, it appears to be playing a role in pathogenesis.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the study team of clinical research coordinators, laboratory personnel, and data management staff whose efforts contributed to the success of this project.

Financial support. The work was supported by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, a Department of Defense program executed through the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (interagency agreement Y1-AI-5072). Additional funding was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (interagency agreement 09FED914272 to M.W.E.), and the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance program (C0366-11-HS to M.W.E.).

Footnotes

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Department of Defense, or other federal agencies.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article. All authors submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest, and the conflicts that the editors consider relevant to this article are disclosed here.

References

  • 1.Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections in US emergency department patients, 2004 and 2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:144–149. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Landrum ML, Neumann C, Cook C, et al. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus blood and skin and soft tissue infections in the US military health system, 2005–2010. JAMA. 2012;308:50–59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leamer NK, Clemmons NS, Jordan NN, Pacha LA. Update: community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection surveillance among active duty military personnel at Fort Benning GA, 2008–2010. Mil Med. 2013;178:914–920. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MD, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:751–762. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miller LG, Tan J, Eells SJ, Benitez E, Radner AB. Prospective investigation of nasal mupirocin, hexachlorophene body wash, and systemic antibiotics for prevention of recurrent community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1084–1086. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01608-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fritz SA, Hogan PG, Hayek G, et al. Household versus individual approaches to eradication of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus in children: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:743–751. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ellis MW, Griffith ME, Dooley DP, et al. Targeted intranasal mupirocin to prevent colonization and infection by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in soldiers: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3591–3598. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01086-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ellis MW, Hospenthal DR, Dooley DP, Gray PJ, Murray CK. Natural history of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in soldiers. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:971–979. doi: 10.1086/423965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fritz SA, Epplin EK, Garbutt J, Storch GA. Skin infection in children colonized with community associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infection. 2009;59:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen AE, Cantey JB, Carroll KC, et al. Discordance between Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and skin infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:244–246. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31818cb0c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kazakova SV, Hageman JC, Matava M, et al. A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:468–475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:11–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller LG, Eells SJ, Taylor AR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization among household contacts of patients with skin infections: risk factors, strain discordance, and complex ecology. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1523–1535. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ellis MW, Schlett CD, Millar EV, et al. Hygiene strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infections: a cluster-randomized controlled trial among high-risk military trainees. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(11):1540–1548. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial testing, 16th informational supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bannerman TL, Hancock GA, Tenover FC, Miller JM. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:551–555. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.551-555.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, Mc-Allister S, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the Unites States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5113–5120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2233–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen L, Mediavilla JR, Oliveira DC, Willey BM, de Lencastre H, Kreiswirth BN. Multiplex real-time PCR for rapid staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3692–3706. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00766-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fosheim GE, Nicholson AC, Albrecht VS, Limbago BM. Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and associated toxin genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3071–3073. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00795-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diep BS, Stone GG, Bauino CJ, et al. The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Disease. 2008;197:1523–1530. doi: 10.1086/587907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang ES, Tan J, Eells S, Rieg G, Tagudar G, Miller LG. Body site colonization in patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other types of S. aureus skin infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:425–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frazee BW, Lynn J, Charlebois ED, Lambert L, Lowery D, Perdreau-Remington F. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in emergency department skin and soft tissue infections. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:311–320. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schleyer AM, Jarman KM, Chan JD, Dellit TH. Role of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening in the management of skin and soft tissue infections. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(8):657–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clarridge JE, 3rd, Harrington AT, Roberts MC, Soge OO, Maquelin K. Impact of strain typing methods on assessment of relationship between paired nares and wound isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:224–231. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02423-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fritz SA, Hogan PG, Hayek G, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children with community-associated Staphylococcus aureus skin infections and their household contacts. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:551–557. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller LG, Diep BA. Clinical practice: colonization, fomites, and virulence: rethinking the pathogenesis of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:752–760. doi: 10.1086/526773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quezada Joaquin NM, Diekema DJ, Perencevich EN, et al. Long-term risk for readmission, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, and death among MRSA-colonized veterans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;57:1169–1172. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01968-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wertheim HF, Vos MC, Ott A, et al. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet. 2004;64:703–705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16897-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cespedes C, Said-Salim B, Miller M, et al. The clonality of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:444–452. doi: 10.1086/427240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES