Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Travel Med. 2018 Jan 1;25(1):10.1093/jtm/tax097. doi: 10.1093/jtm/tax097

Business travel-associated illness: a GeoSentinel analysis

Lin H Chen 1,*, Karin Leder 2, Kira A Barbre 3, Patricia Schlagenhauf 4, Michael Libman 5, Jay Keystone 6, Marc Mendelson 7, Philippe Gautret 8, Eli Schwartz 9, Marc Shaw 10, Sue MacDonald 11, Anne McCarthy 12, Bradley A Connor 13, Douglas H Esposito 3, Davidson Hamer 14, Mary E Wilson 15,16, for the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network
PMCID: PMC5824651  NIHMSID: NIHMS941298  PMID: 29462444

Abstract

Background

Analysis of a large cohort of business travelers will help clinicians focus on frequent and serious illnesses. We aimed to describe travel-related health problems in business travelers.

Methods

GeoSentinel Surveillance Network consists of 64 travel and tropical medicine clinics in 29 countries; descriptive analysis was performed on ill business travelers, defined as persons traveling for work, evaluated after international travel 1 January 1997 through 31 December 2014.

Results

Among 12 203 business travelers seen 1997–2014 (14 045 eligible diagnoses), the majority (97%) were adults aged 20–64 years; most (74%) reported from Western Europe or North America; two-thirds were male. Most (86%) were outpatients. Fewer than half (45%) reported a pre-travel healthcare encounter. Frequent regions of exposure were sub-Saharan Africa (37%), Southeast Asia (15%) and South Central Asia (14%). The most frequent diagnoses were malaria (9%), acute unspecified diarrhea (8%), viral syndrome (6%), acute bacterial diarrhea (5%) and chronic diarrhea (4%). Species was reported for 973 (90%) of 1079 patients with malaria, predominantly Plasmodium falciparum acquired in sub-Saharan Africa. Of 584 (54%) with malaria chemoprophylaxis information, 92% took none or incomplete courses. Thirteen deaths were reported, over half of which were due to malaria; others succumbed to pneumonia, typhoid fever, rabies, melioidosis and pyogenic abscess.

Conclusions

Diarrheal illness was a major cause of morbidity. Malaria contributed substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly among business travelers to sub-Saharan Africa. Underuse or non-use of chemoprophylaxis contributed to malaria cases. Deaths in business travelers could be reduced by improving adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis and targeted vaccination for vaccine-preventable diseases. Pre-travel advice is indicated for business travelers and is currently under-utilized and needs improvement.

Keywords: Travel, business, diarrhea, malaria, occupational medicine, vaccine-preventable disease, death

Background

Globally, business travel comprises ~14% of all international travel.1 The destination, frequency and duration of travel among business travelers are highly variable.2 A review of more than 800 000 international trips by employees and reports of medical assistance provided to 48 multinational corporations found that 26% of corporate travelers had at least three international trips per year, 17% traveled at least 30 days during the year, and 11% had at least one trip with a duration of 30 days or more; this cohort reported 1188 illnesses.3

Illness in an employee while traveling has additional consequences that may be less relevant if in their country of residence (with respect to healthcare, reduced productivity as harder to find replacement, potential repatriation).4 Other than the study described above, most analyses of illness in these travelers have focused on a single company or small cohorts. The GeoSentinel Surveillance Network consists of 64 travel and tropical medicine clinics in 29 countries with representation from six continents, arguably provides one of the largest global sample of business travelers, and allows a systematic analysis of their health problems.5 We describe the travel patterns of ill business travelers entered in the database and identify illnesses that affect this group.

Methods

GeoSentinel Surveillance Network data on travelers seen after travel from 1997 through 2014 were analyzed. GeoSentinel captures data on travelers that have crossed an international border and have been evaluated for a presumed travel-associated illness.5 Business travelers who presented to a GeoSentinel site and who had at least one travel-related diagnosis were included. We defined business travel as ‘travel for the purpose of working, (encompassing a range of occupational-related travel, including corporate travel, field work) or attending a meeting or other work-related event such as conferences; travelers accompanying the business traveler (often family members) are also defined as ‘business’ travelers. Patients missing data on age or under the age of 20 years at time of diagnosis were excluded from analysis.

Final diagnoses are assigned by the clinician and chosen from a list of >500 standard GeoSentinel diagnosis codes, which may be etiologic (e.g. falciparum malaria, influenza, Salmonella Typhi) or syndromic (e.g. diarrhea, fever, rash).5 Diagnosis codes were also categorized into broad syndrome groups.5 Each traveler may have more than one diagnosis, and each diagnosis is recorded as confirmed, probable or suspected. We included only diagnoses that were confirmed or probable, and were determined by the clinician to be ‘travel-related.’ We excluded the diagnoses ‘healthy,’ ‘lost to follow up’ and ‘screening’; non-infectious diagnoses not directly related to travel (Appendix); and diagnoses with uncertain relationship to travel or uncertain time and place of exposure (Appendix).

We used descriptive analyses to describe overall demographics and itinerary characteristics of business travelers seen after travel, as well as diagnoses and seriousness (outpatient/inpatient/death). We distinguished diagnoses among expatriates (designated by reporting sites for persons living in a destination country with an independent residence, using mostly the infrastructure used by local residents of the same economic class, independent of duration of residence) from non-expatriate business travelers. We also describe the top diagnoses geographically by region of exposure according to modified United Nations’ world regions; we combined Australia, New Zealand, North America and Western Europe since each held high human development index and represented less frequent locations of illness acquisition.5

GeoSentinel’s data collection and analysis protocol has been reviewed by a human subjects advisor for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and is classified as public health surveillance; for this reason, it has been determined that IRB review is not required.

Results

This analysis included 12 203 ill business travelers (14 045 confirmed or probable diagnoses) who presented post-travel to a GeoSentinel clinic (Table 1). Median age was 40 years and 11 779 (97%) travelers were aged 20–64 years; two-thirds were male. Most were seen as outpatients; fewer than half reported a pre-travel health encounter. Three-quarters were reported from Western Europe or North America. Frequent regions of exposure were sub-Saharan Africa (37%), Southeast Asia (15%), South Central Asia (14%), South America (7%), Northeast Asia (6%) and Central America (4%). Twelve percent were expatriate business travelers.

Table 1.

Demographics of 12 203 business travelers evaluated after travel at GeoSentinel sites from 1997 through 2014

Characteristic N %
Agea
 20–64 11 779 97
 ≥65 424 3
Gendera
 Male 8178 67
 Female 3970 33
Patient typea
 Inpatient 1551 13
 Outpatient 10 548 86
Pre-travel encounter
 Yes 5476 45
 No 4148 34
 Don’t know/Missing 2579 21
Interval from travel to presentation, weeks
 ≤1 4646 38
 1–6 3377 27
 ≥6 1346 11
 Unknown 2834 23
Region of GeoSentinel site
 Australia/New Zealand 463 4
 Middle East 726 6
 North America 2989 24
 North East Asia 1117 9
 South America 64 1
 South Central Asia 128 1
 Southeast Asia 404 3
 Sub-Saharan Africa 166 1
 Western Europe 6146 50
Region of exposureb
 Australia/New Zealand 45 <1
 Caribbean 391 3
 Central America 504 4
 Eastern Europe 109 1
 Middle East 293 2
 North Africa 358 3
 North America 210 2
 North East Asia 731 6
 Oceania 198 2
 South America 814 7
 South Central Asia 1732 14
 Southeast Asia 1785 15
 Sub-Saharan Africa 4490 37
 Western Europe 407 3
 Risk qualifier Expatriate 1512 12
a

Up to 1% of data are missing for the variable and are not displayed in the table.

b

We excluded 1173 of 13 227 initial patients (9%) with no reported country or region of exposure; 136 (1%) included patients had unascertainable regions of exposure (two probable countries of exposure in two different regions).

Syndromes and diagnoses

The most frequently reported disease syndromes among the 14 045 total diagnoses were acute diarrhea (24%), febrile/systemic illness (24%), dermatologic (13%), respiratory (10%), other gastrointestinal problems (8%) and chronic diarrhea (8%) (Table 2). The most frequent diagnoses were malaria (9%), acute unspecified diarrhea (8%), viral syndrome (6%), acute bacterial diarrhea (5%) and chronic diarrhea (4%). Among non-expatriate business travelers, the most frequent diagnoses were acute unspecified diarrhea, viral syndrome, acute bacterial diarrhea, chronic diarrhea and Plasmodium falciparum malaria (each <10% of total) (Table 2 Among expatriate business travelers, the most frequent diagnosis was P. falciparum malaria (6%), followed by viral syndrome, chronic diarrhea, acute unspecified diarrhea, dengue, Blastocystis and upper respiratory tract infection (3% each).

Table 2.

Syndromes/system groupings of 14 045 diagnoses of 12 203 business travelers evaluated after travel at GeoSentinel sites from 1997 to 2014, and most frequent diagnoses for 1512 expatriates and 10 691 non-expatriates

All business travelers N = 14 045 diagnoses Expatriate N = 1830 diagnoses Non-expatriate N = 12 215 diagnoses



Syndrome N % Diagnosis N % Diagnosis N %
1 Acute diarrhea 3331 24 Malaria, Plasmodium falciparuma 112 6 Diarrhea, acute unspecified 1060 9
2 Febrile systemic illness 3314 24 Viral syndrome (no rash) 60 3 Viral syndrome (no rash) 755 6
3 Dermatologic 1781 13 Diarrhea, chronic unknown 55 3 Diarrhea, acute bacterial 639 5
4 Respiratory 1403 10 Diarrhea, acute unspecified 54 3 Diarrhea, chronic unknown 541 4
5 Gastrointestinal other 1131 8 Dengue, uncomplicated 52 3 Malaria, P. falciparuma 541 4
6 Chronic diarrhea 1060 8 Blastocystis sp. 50 3 Giardia 359 3
7 Nonspecific symptoms or findings 497 4 Respiratory tract infection (upper) 47 3 Respiratory tract infection (upper) 343 3
8 Genitourinary and sexually transmitted infections 320 2 Irritable bowel syndrome, post-infectious 45 2 Irritable bowel syndrome, post-infectious 305 3
9 Injury and musculoskeletal 279 2 Diarrhea, acute bacterial 44 2 Dengue, uncomplicated 304 2
10 Neurologic 211 1 Malaria, Plasmodium vivaxa 44 2 Febrile illness unspecified (<3 weeks) 264 2
11 Psychologic 197 1 Febrile illness unspecified (<3 weeks) 41 2 Blastocystis sp. 250 2
12 Miscellaneous tissue parasites 174 1 Fatigue ≥1 month (not febrile) 36 2 Bite, insect (includes sting) 235 2
13 Oral and dental 166 1 Giardia 36 2 Gastroenteritis 224 2
14 Adverse reaction to medication or vaccine 60 <1 Bite, dog 33 2 Campylobacter spp. 202 2
15 Chronic diseaseb 33 <1 Malaria, species unknown 28 2 Influenza-like illness 191 2
16 Ophthalmologic 28 <1 Schistosomiasis, human species unknown 28 1 Bronchitis, acute 179 1
17 Cardiovascular 26 <1 Bronchitis, acute 23 1 Rash, unknown etiology (non-febrile) 148 1
18 Obstetrics and gynecology 21 <1 Rash, unknown etiology (non-febrile) 22 1 Malaria, Plasmodium vivaxa 133 1
19 Death 13 <1 Malaria, severe and complicated, non-cerebral 20 1 Bite, dog 118 1
20 Skin and soft tissue infection, superficial 18 1 Pneumonia, bacterial (lobar) 113 1
a

Plasmodium species diagnoses may include co-infection with other species.

b

Chronic disease grouping included G6PD deficient (2), asymptomatic newly diagnosed HIV (20), Reiter’s syndrome (11).

Analysis by regions highlighted the frequency of diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria for sub-Saharan Africa (13% of diagnoses from the region) and P. vivax malaria for Oceania (12%) (Table 3). Uncomplicated dengue infection was the most frequent specific diagnosis for the Caribbean (9%); dog bite for Eastern Europe (9%). For the combined group that included Australia, New Zealand, North America and Western Europe, the most frequent diagnosis was upper respiratory tract infection (8%). Acute unspecified diarrhea was the most frequent diagnosis for the remaining regions, ranging from 10% to 19% of diagnoses (Table 3). Acute bacterial diarrhea and chronic diarrhea of unknown cause were frequent diagnoses for many regions.

Table 3.

Most frequent diagnoses by region of exposurea among 10 567 non-expatriate business travelersb with 12 080 total diagnoses evaluated at GeoSentinel sites from 1997 to 2014

Sub-Saharan Africa (N = 3799) South Central Asia (N = 1569) Southeast Asia (N = 1556) South America (N = 742)




Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%)
P. falciparum malaria 478 (13%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 224 (14%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 151 (10%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 69 (9%)
Acute unspecified diarrhea 328 (9%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 134 (9%) Viral syndrome, no rash 105 (7%) Viral syndrome, no rash 62 (8%)
Viral syndrome, no rash 306 (8%) Giardia 115 (7%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 96 (6%) Insect bite 36 (5%)
Acute bacterial diarrhea 201 (5%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 106 (7%) Uncomplicated dengue 91 (6%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 35 (5%)
Chronic unknown diarrhea 157 (4%) Viral syndrome, no rash 102 (7%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 68 (4%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 34 (5%)
Unspecified febrile illness (<3 weeks) 145 (4%) Uncomplicated dengue 84 (5%) Upper respiratory tract infection 65 (4%) Giardia 29 (4%)
Giardia 102 (3%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 55 (4%) P. vivax malaria 44 (3%) Blastocystis 27 (4%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 97 (3%) Campylobacter 52 (3%) Gastroenteritis 43 (3%) Uncomplicated dengue 26 (4%)
Insect bite 81 (2%) Blastocystis 51 (3%) Campylobacter 41 (3%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 26 (4%)
Blastocystis 79 (2%) Gastroenteritis 51 (3%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 41 (3%) P. vivax malaria 18 (2%)
Northeast Asia (N = 654) Australia/New Zealand, North America, Western Europe (N = 583) Central America (N = 452) Caribbean (N = 355)




Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%)

Acute unspecified diarrhea 64 (10%) Upper respiratory tract infection 44 (8%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 49 (11%) Uncomplicated dengue 33 (9%)
Acute bacterial diarrhea 47 (7%) Acute bronchitis 25 (4%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 38 (8%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 31 (9%)
Viral syndrome, no rash 47 (7%) Viral syndrome, no rash 23 (4%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 35 (8%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 25 (7%)
Chronic unknown diarrhea 36 (6%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 22 (4%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 33 (7%) Viral syndrome, no rash 24 (7%)
Acute bronchitis 31 (5%) Influenza-like illness 22 (4%) Giardia 23 (5%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 16 (5%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 27 (4%) Bacterial lobar pneumonia 21 (4%) Blastocystis 21 (5%) Upper respiratory tract infection 15 (4%)
Influenza-like illnesses 26 (4%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 19 (3%) Viral syndrome, no rash 21 (5%) Insect bite 14 (4%)
Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 22 (3%) Campylobacter 18 (3%) Insect bite 17 (4%) Chikungunya virus infection 13 (4%)
Dog bite 21 (3%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 18 (3%) Gastroenteritis 10 (2%) Cutaneous larva migrans 11 (3%)
Gastroenteritis 15 (2%) Acute sinusitis 18 (3%) Cutaneous leishmaniasis 10 (2%) Unspecified febrile illness 9 (3%)
N Africa (N = 328) Middle East (N = 265) Oceania (N = 163) Eastern Europe (N = 101)




Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%)

Acute unspecified diarrhea 62 (19%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 30 (11%) P. vivax malaria 19 (12%) Dog bite 9 (9%)
Acute bacterial diarrhea 25 (8%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 23 (9%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 13 (8%) Acute unspecified diarrhea 9 (9%)
Chronic unknown diarrhea 19 (6%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 20 (8%) Viral syndrome, no rash 12 (7%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 7 (7%)
Viral syndrome, no rash 19 (6%) Viral syndrome, no rash 17 (6%) Chikungunya virus infection 8 (5%) Chronic unknown diarrhea 7 (7%)
P. falciparum malaria 15 (5%) Campylobacter 11 (4%) Insect bite 6 (4%) Giardia 6 (6%)
Giardia 12 (4%) Cutaneous leishmaniasis 9 (3%) Acute bacterial diarrhea 6 (4%) Campylobacter 4 (4%)
Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 11 (3%) Upper respiratory tract infection 9 (3%) Skin and soft-tissue infection (secondary of existing lesion) 6 (4%) Viral syndrome, no rash 4 (4%)
Sub-Saharan Africa (N = 3799) South Central Asia (N = 1569) Southeast Asia (N = 1556) South America (N = 742)




Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%) Diagnosis N (%)

Upper respiratory tract infection 11 (3%) Giardia 8 (3%) Gastroenteritis 5 (3%) Upper respiratory tract infection 3 (3%)
Blastocystis 9 (3%) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome 7 (3%) Upper respiratory tract infection 5 (3%) Non-septic arthritis 2 (2%)
Unspecified febrile illness (<3 weeks) 9 (3%) Dog bite 6 (2%) Uncomplicated dengue 4 (2%) Tick bite 2 (2%)
a

Regions of exposure are based on modified United Nations’ world regions; we combined Australia, New Zealand, North America and Western Europe since each held high human development index and represented less frequent locations of illness acquisition.

b

124 patients excluded from table because regions of exposure were not ascertainable.

Malaria diagnoses

Among 1079 patients with malaria, 973 had species reported (90%); 706 (65%) were infected with P. falciparum, 171 (15%) with P. vivax, 49 (5%) with P. ovale, 29 (3%) with P. malariae, 1 (<1%) with P. knowlesi, and 17 (2%) with mixed infections. The majority of 1079 had exposure in sub-Saharan Africa (79%); other exposure regions included Southeast Asia (8%), South Central Asia (4%), Oceania (3%), South America (2%) and North Africa (2%) (Table 4). Of 584 (54%) with chemoprophylaxis information, 519 (89%) took no chemoprophylaxis and 19 (3%) took incomplete chemoprophylaxis. There were 112 patients with severe malaria (46 cerebral). Among 103 severe cases with species available, 100 had P. falciparum (one co-infected with P. ovale) and three had P. vivax. All severe malaria cases had exposure in Africa except for two P. vivax cases (acquired in India and Myanmar) and one P. falciparum cases (acquired in Guyana). Among the 1079 patients with malaria, 589 (55%) were hospitalized and 466 (43%) reported pre-travel encounters. Seven patients died; all malaria fatalities with species information were due to P. falciparum (Table 5).

Table 4.

Malaria species identified in business travelers evaluated after travel at GeoSentinel sites from 1997 to 2014, by region of exposurea (N = 1079)

Malaria species Sub-Saharan
Africa (854)
Southeast
Asia (83)
South Central
Asia (48)
Oceania
(35)
South
America (24)
North
Africa (21)
Caribbeanb
(5)
Central
America (3)
Middle
East (1)
Missing
(5)
Total
(1079)
P. falciparum 644 (75) 27 (33) 3 (6) 4 (11) 4 (17) 17 (81) 4 (80) 1 (33) 0 (0) 2 (40) 706 (65)
P. vivax 32 (4) 48 (58) 40 (83) 28 (80) 17 (70) 2 (10) 0 (0) 2 (66) 1 (100) 1 (20) 171 (15)
P. ovale 44 (5) 0 (0) 1 (2) 1 (3) 1 (4) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (20) 49 (5)
P. malariae 26 (3) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (20) 29 (3)
P. knowlesi 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (<1)
Multiple species 9 (1) 6 (7) 1 (2) 0 (0) 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 17 (2)
Species unknown 99 (12) 0 (0) 3 (6) 2 (6) 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 106 (10)
a

Regions were classified based on modified United Nations world regions8: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/. Last accessed March 28, 2017.

b

Cases are from Hispaniola.

Table 5.

Deaths in business travelers evaluated after travel at GeoSentinel sites from 1997 to 2014

Subject
(1–14)
Year Age
(years)
Sex Diagnoses Reported cause of death Country
of birth
Country
of
residence
Country of
exposure
Expatriate/
non-expatriate
Pre-travel
encounter
1 2007 24 F Uncomplicated dengue; Salmonella typhi Typhoid Indonesia Singapore Indonesia Expatriate No
2 2007 66 M P. falciparum malaria; chloroquine resistant P. falciparum malaria; severe and complicated non-cerebral malaria Shock Canada Canada Burkina Faso Non-expatriate No
3 1999 50 M P. falciparum malaria; severe and complicated cerebral malaria Multi-organ failure Israel Israel Ghana Expatriate No
4 2000 47 M Pyogenic abscess (not skin, tonsillar, liver or dental) Not available India Israel India Expatriate No
5 2004 61 M Severe and complicated cerebral malaria, P. falciparum malaria Multi-organ failure Israel Israel Sierra Leone Non-expatriate Yes
6 2006 65 M Dog bite; rabies Rabies Japan Japan Philippines Expatriate No
7 2008 82 M Bacterial pneumonia (lobar) Not available Israel Israel India Non-expatriate No
8 2008 53 M Atypical, diffuse pneumonia Pneumonia Singapore Vietnam Vietnam Non-expatriate No
9 2009 57 M Melioidosis Sepsis Australia Australia Thailand Non-expatriate Yes
10 2010 30 F Severe and complicated cerebral malaria, P. falciparum malaria Multi-organ failure Israel Israel Equatorial Guinea Expatriate Yes
11 2010 53 M P. falciparum malaria; severe and complicated non-cerebral malaria Malaria, severe and complicated non-cerebral Portugal Portugal Angola Non-expatriate Yes
12 2011 40 M Severe and complicated cerebral malaria Cerebral malaria Portugal Portugal Angola Non-expatriate Yes
13 2013 33 M Severe and complicated cerebral malaria; P. falciparum malaria Malaria, P. falciparum Japan United States Liberia Non-expatriate Yes

Species distributions for the regions are presented in Table 4. Plasmodium falciparum was the predominant species acquired in Africa, and P. vivax was the main species acquired in other regions.

Deaths

Thirteen deaths occurred in business travelers seen after travel, of which 7 (54%) were from malaria. All but two fatalities occurred in male travelers. Age ranged from 24 to 82 years. Other causes of deaths are shown in Table 5.

Vaccine-preventable diseases

A total of 847 potentially vaccine-preventable diagnoses (7% of total diagnoses) were identified. The most frequently recorded were 320 influenza and influenza-like illness (38% of potential VPD), 200 animal exposure with potential for rabies (24%), 124 bacterial lobar pneumonia without specified organism (15%) and 56 typhoid (7%). There were 32 cases of hepatitis A, nine cases of hepatitis B, and 35 cases of acute unspecified hepatitis. Also identified were measles (8), mumps (2), rubella (5), pertussis (15), varicella (13), zoster (16), bacterial meningitis (3), and one case each of meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. One case of tick-borne encephalitis was reported, as were an additional six cases of acute encephalitis without proven viral etiology. No cases of Japanese encephalitis or yellow fever were identified.

Sexually transmitted infections

There were 213 potential sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses (2% of total diagnoses), most frequently acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; n = 45), scabies (n = 40), herpes simplex virus (HSV; n = 27), and syphilis (n = 22). There were also cases of pelvic inflammatory disease/vaginitis/cervicitis/endometritis (n = 18), <5 cases each of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, genital warts, genital ulcer, molluscum contagiosum, Trichomonas vaginalis and nine cases of unspecified STI.

Discussion

Our analysis shows a broad spectrum of illness related to business travel. Malaria diagnoses comprised 7% and 13% of ill returning non-expatriate and expatriate business travelers, respectively. Notably, half of the deaths reported in this population were due to malaria. We also found a large number of potentially vaccine-preventable diseases. Furthermore, we established gastrointestinal diagnoses as the most frequent diagnoses related to business travel. These results underscore the need to promote pre-travel preparation – in our analysis, less than half of the ill presenting business travelers reported a pre-travel medical consultation.

It is in the best interest of employers to ensure the health of their employees working internationally. Corporations sending staff overseas usually are expected to cover the costs of providing effective health education, vaccination and risk mitigation programs,3 either via a contractual arrangement with a provider organization or via an on-site occupational health clinic.6 A company culture that focuses on health, safety and security can contribute positively to high knowledge scores about health risks among business travelers.7 Additionally, corporations may be legally liable.6 Not specifically addressed, but also to be considered, are the consequences from acquisition of infectious diseases that are potentially transmissible to the employees’ families and home and work communities. Consequently, some large corporations now require pre-travel medical consultation before international trips.4 Despite this trend, several reports have identified business travelers as a major risk group for acquiring malaria.814 An analysis in China of 1 420 imported malaria cases found overseas workers accounted for 82%; complications occurred in 8% and 12 died.8 Another report11 described almost 8000 labor-related P. falciparum infections acquired in Africa, with increased cases likely related to recent business contracts between China and Africa combined with a lack of malaria awareness and prevention among this group. In the US, business was found to be the purpose of travel in 19% of fatal malaria cases.14

Our results underscore the importance of malaria as a cause of death in business travelers. Long-term business travelers, compared with short-term, have been shown to be more likely to have P. falciparum or P. vivax malaria,9 but even short-term, frequent business travelers can have a high cumulative risk. A recent analysis found that the pre-travel consultation was associated with a lower proportion of P. falciparum malaria morbidity and less severe disease in travelers, including business travelers.10 Occupational medicine advisors and travel medicine experts are, however, confronted with challenges in malaria prevention in this group. Adherence to personal protection measures and chemoprophylaxis, particularly in long-term and frequent business travelers, is a major hurdle15,16 and requires constant audit. Some large companies have initiated innovative approaches involving adherence and motivator enablers to overcome noncompliance, including urine tests to verify intake of chemoprophylaxis.17

Dengue was diagnosed much less frequently than malaria in this population, possibly due to the self-limited nature of dengue or the short incubation of dengue that may have led to evaluation during the trip and not captured by GeoSentinel sites. Although some business travelers work primarily in urban areas, these are still sites of active dengue transmission in tropical and subtropical countries, and business travelers are expected to be at risk for dengue. To date, studies of dengue fever or seroconversion in travelers generally have not analyzed reason for travel for those infected; thus, there are currently no systematically collected data on risk to business travelers relative to other travelers.

The frequency of vaccine-preventable diseases diagnosed in business travelers raises concern that business travelers underestimate the risk of these potentially preventable diseases. Prior GeoSentinel analyses of vaccine-preventable diseases found that travel for business was associated with a diagnosis of influenza.18 Our results affirm that influenza-like illness is a frequent diagnosis in business travelers. Although no cases of yellow fever were reported in the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network, the recent acquisition of yellow fever by numerous Chinese nationals working in Angola, and returning to parts of China that may be receptive to yellow fever introduction, is a reminder of the role that corporations should play in ensuring the health of their employees and in averting a potential public health disaster.19 Notably, the estimated incidence of animal-related exposures requiring rabies post-exposure prophylaxis is 1.3 per 1 000 per month in expatriates,20 and among 60 cases of rabies in international travelers reported from 1990 to 2012, 10 were in business and expatriate travelers.21 Along with our results, evidence has accumulated regarding rabies risk in business travelers, and advice regarding rabies risk should be provided systematically at pre-travel encounters. Given the unreliable access to rabies vaccine and immune globulin in many areas, and in consideration of cumulative exposure risk, preventive pre-travel vaccination may be indicated.

Consumption of contaminated food/drink is a frequent route of exposure for ill business travelers. Generally the estimated incidence of travelers’ diarrhea has declined from 65% 20 years ago to 10–40% currently, attributed to improved economic development, tourism infrastructure, availability of bottled water and greater awareness of risk.22 However, gastrointestinal problems, especially travelers’ diarrhea, continue to rank at the top of travel-related health problems in all international travelers.5,23 It is important to advise business travelers on basic precautions, including hand hygiene and choice and preparation of food and beverages, although the effectiveness of pre-travel advice in reducing travel-related diarrhea appears poor.22

Dermatologic diagnoses were the third most frequent syndromic group. (Tables 23) Some reports have suggested that business travelers experience dermatologic problems less frequently than tourist travelers, specifically cutaneous larva migrans, insect bites, and allergic or generalized rash.5,24,25 Nonetheless, 7% of 226 international business travelers employed by the Coca Cola Company responding to a survey reported using a topical antibiotic or hydrocortisone cream during their trip.26 Although specific etiologies of rashes were not reported, self-treatable and superficial skin conditions appeared frequent, which supports advising business travelers to carry these over-the-counter medications for self-management and also when to seek medical evaluation.

For expatriate business travelers, malaria, dengue, gastrointestinal problems and respiratory illness were the most frequent diagnoses, illustrating the risks resulting from increased exposure to host-country environmental risks and lifestyle choices.27 A frequent challenge for expatriate travelers is adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis; expatriates discontinue prophylaxis progressively over time during residence abroad,28,29 so travel medicine specialists should consider prescribing standby emergency malaria self-treatment. For expatriate business travelers, preparation should include comprehensive travel insurance including adequate coverage for medical, surgical, and dental healthcare abroad, 24-h emergency telephone access and emergency medical evacuation from their destinations, and, optimally, availability of local service providers to assist in non-critical medical problems.

Business travelers have been consistently identified as a high-risk group for acquiring STIs.3033 Matteelli et al. found that business travel was the most frequent reason for travelers with STI diagnoses seen during travel, accounting for 62.5%.30 Our analysis identified a small proportion of psychological problems in business travelers, despite reports that precipitation or aggravation of psychological disorders have been the most frequent causes for failure of overseas assignments and repatriation among business travelers,34,35 and that frequent international travel has been associated with increased insurance claims for psychological illness.36 This analysis illustrates that GeoSentinel surveillance is less sensitive at detecting STIs, non-infectious conditions and psychological illness.

Our data did not capture whether the travelers were evacuated for severe disease. Among business travelers, analysis of nearly 1 million trips showed that one trip in 36 000 required evacuation (1 in 6400 for ‘high-risk’ destinations).3 Among 504 patients evacuated by a single German medical evacuation service, the majority were for trauma (26%), stroke (15%), and myocardial infarction (8%), with less frequent infectious causes being pneumonia (3%) and meningitis (1%).37 For Shell International employees, medical evacuation occurred at a rate of 4 per 1000 during 2008–2012, most frequently for trauma (18%), digestive (14%), musculoskeletal (12%), cardiac (11%) and neurological (9%) diagnoses.38 Importantly, 9% were due to acute complications of a pre-existing diagnosis, illustrating the value of pre-travel health assessments and stabilization of any underlying condition.38 The risk of hospitalization and evacuation of expatriate workers has been strongly linked to the World Health Organization Human Development Index for the destination country.39 We found that expatriate workers appear less likely to require evacuation for medical problems than non-expatriate business travelers, perhaps due to more stringent screening, better knowledge of local resources, and better local support structures, or reporting bias.

The GeoSentinel database does not distinguish among the diverse population of business travelers or employment status, and lacks details of occupation, activities, and exposures. In this heterogeneous population, future data collection will benefit from more detailed occupational information to ascertain whether certain groups are at increased risk of illnesses. To refine the classification of business travelers in the GeoSentinel database, data collection will be revised to delineate whether the traveler is a family member accompanying a business traveler. Also, GeoSentinel sites are mainly outpatient clinics and, thus, may under-report travelers who are hospitalized subsequent to their outpatient evaluation at GeoSentinel sites; information such as malaria chemoprophylaxis taken may be incomplete or biased. Moreover, the sites specialize in tropical and travel medicine and infectious diseases, and typically do not capture trauma and injury, and likely also underestimate other problems such as psychological issues and STIs that are evaluated in other centers outside the GeoSentinel network. Finally, denominators of travelers are lacking, and descriptive analysis cannot derive rates of risk.

The strength of our analyses is that we provide robust, systematic, clinician-verified diagnoses on more than 12 000 business travelers from all continents, with supporting demographic and geographic details.

Conclusion

Diarrheal illness is a major cause of morbidity in business travelers; clear advice on travelers’ diarrhea prevention and self-treatment should be provided. Malaria contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in both non-expatriate and expatriate business travelers, is associated with high hospitalization rates and fatalities, and is a particular risk for the business traveler to sub-Saharan Africa. Underuse or non-use of malaria chemo-prophylaxis contributes to the problem, and new approaches to improve adherence are needed. Deaths in business travelers could likely be reduced by improving adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis, targeted vaccination for vaccine-preventable diseases, and provision of advice to avoid contaminated food and drink. Given the severity and mortality associated with identified malaria cases and vaccine-preventable diseases, it is critical to engage the employers. To optimize prevention, occupational health programs could seek ways to improve adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis, target immunizations, and provide advice to avoid contaminated food and drink. Non-infectious disease hazards, not reflected in GeoSentinel data, might have even greater impact on business travelers. Our analysis shows that pre-travel health advice is currently under-utilized (or not provided) by business travelers, and our findings provide an evidence base to support geographically tailored guidelines for occupational medicine clinicians and business travelers.

Acknowledgments

*Additional members of the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network who contributed data but did not author this article are: Frank von Sonnenburg and Camilla Rothe (Munich, Germany), Kevin Kain and Andrea Boggild (Toronto, Canada), Jakob Cramer, Sabine Jordan, and Christof Vinnemeier (Hamburg, Germany), Cedric Yansouni (Montreal, Canada), Francois Chappuis (Geneva, Switzerland), Eric Caumes and Alice Perignon (Paris, France), Joe Torresi (Melbourne, Australia), Shuzo Kanagawa and Yasuyuki Kato (Tokyo, Japan), Martin Grobusch and Bram Goorhuis (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Emilie Javelle (Marseille, France), Phyllis Kozarsky and Henry Wu (Atlanta, USA), Yukiriro Yoshimura and Natsuo Tachikawa (Yokohama City, Japan), Poh-Lian Lim (Singapore), Watcharapong Piyaphanee and Udomsak Silachamroon (Bangkok, Thailand), Holly Murphy and Prativa Pandey (Katmandu, Nepal), Hilmir Ásgeirsson and Hedvig Glans (Stockholm, Sweden), Mogens Jensenius (Oslo, Norway), Sarah Borwein (Hong Kong SAR, China), Devon Hale, Daniel Leung, and Scott Benson (Salt Lake City, Utah), Perry van Genderen (Rotterdam, Netherlands), Noreen Hynes (Baltimore, USA), Rainer Weber (Zurich, Switzerland), William Stauffer and Pat Walker (St. Paul, USA), Jean Haulman and David Roesel (Seattle, USA), Frank Mockenhaupt and Gundel Harms-Zwingenberger (Berlin, Germany), Christoph Rapp and Cecile Ficko (Paris, France), Peter Vincent (Cape Town, South Africa), Francesco Castelli and Alberto Matteelli (Brescia, Italy), Susan Anderson (Palo Alto, USA), Johnnie Yates (Honolulu, USA), Carmelo Licitra and Alena Klochko (Orlando, USA), Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas and Ben Warne (Cambridge, UK), Rogelio Lopez-Velez and Francesca Norman (Madrid, Spain), Jean Vincelette and Sapha Barkati (Montreal, Canada), John Cahill and George McKinley (New York, USA), Phi Truong Hoang Phu (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam), Cecilia Perret Perez (Santiago, Chile), David Lalloo and Nicholas Beeching (Liverpool, UK), Christina Coyle (Bronx, USA), Jan Hajek and Wayne Ghesquiere (Vancouver, Canada), Hugo Siu and Luis Manuel Valdez (Lima, Peru), Paul Kelly and Stefan Hagmann (Bronx, USA), Elizabeth Barnett and Natasha Hochberg (Boston, USA), Denis Malvy and Alexandre Duvignaud (Bordeaux, France), Susan Kuhn (Calgary, Canada).

Funding

GeoSentinel, the global surveillance network of the International Society of Travel Medicine (ISTM), is supported by a cooperative agreement (U50CK00189) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, International Society of Travel Medicine, and Public Health Agency of Canada. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.

Appendix to Methods: Excluded Diagnoses

  • Non-infectious diagnoses with no plausible relationship to travel were excluded (236 diagnoses): hypertension, asthma, hemorrhoids, diabetes, hepatitis, chronic unspecified, autoimmune disorders, heart disease, arrhythmia, heart disease, coronary artery disease, angina, heart disease, other, cancer, hematologic, cancer, celiac disease, fibromyalgia, cirrhosis, hernia, palpitations, Crohn’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), tumor, benign superficial, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thyroid disease, menstrual disorder, colonic polyposis, metabolic disorder, ovarian cyst, thalassemia.

  • Diagnoses with uncertain relationship to travel and time and place of exposure were excluded (245 diagnoses): latent tuberculosis, asymptomatic HIV, AIDS, chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B, asymptomatic hepatitis B carrier and pregnancy.

  • Diagnoses coded as ‘Other’ were matched with existing GeoSentinel diagnoses, when possible. Where no corresponding eligible GeoSentinel diagnosis existed, the diagnosis was excluded (154 diagnoses).

Footnotes

Parts of the analysis were presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Travel Medicine and Hygiene in Philadelphia, PA, USA, 27 October 2015.

Conflict of interest: L.H.C. is an advisor for Shoreland, Inc., serves on DSMB for Valneva, and has received speaker travel support and honorarium from GSK. K.L. has received travel support and honorarium from GSK, research support from Sanofi Pasteur, and a consultancy from Immuron. P.S. has provided consultancy services to EXXon Mobil, SOS International and F. Hoffmann-La Roche. D.H.H. is a member of the iJet advisory board and has served as a consultant to Glaxo Smith Kline’s and Inovio’s vaccine division. All other co-authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.World Tourism Organization. [Accessed June 5, 2017];UNWTO Highlights. 2015 Available at http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284416899.
  • 2.Chen LH, Leder K, Wilson ME. Business travelers: vaccination considerations for this population. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013;12:453–66. doi: 10.1586/erv.13.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Druckman M, Harber P, Liu Y, Quigley RL. Assessing the risk of work-related international travel. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56:1161–6. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bunn W. Vaccine and international health programs for employees traveling and living abroad. J Travel Med. 2001;8:S20–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2001.tb00539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harvey K, Esposito DH, Han P, et al. Surveillance for travel-related disease–GeoSentinel Surveillance System, United States, 1997–2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62:1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bunn WB. Assessing risk and improving travel vaccine programs for business travelers. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56:1167–8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berg J, Breederveld D, Roukens AH, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward malaria risk and prevention among frequent business travelers of a major oil and gas company. J Travel Med. 2011;18:395–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2011.00555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Z, Zhang Q, Zheng C, et al. Epidemiologic features of overseas imported malaria in the People’s Republic of China. Maar J. 2016;15:141. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1188-7. Erratum in: Malar J 2016; 15: 318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lim PL, Han P, Chen LH, et al. Expatriates ill after travel: results from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:386. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schlagenhauf P, Weld L, Goorhuis A, et al. Travel-associated infection presenting in Europe (2008–12): an analysis of EuroTravNet longitudinal, surveillance data, and evaluation of the effect of the pre-travel consultation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015:55–64. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71000-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou S, Li Z, Cotter C, et al. Trends of imported malaria in China 2010–2014: analysis of surveillance data. Malar J. 2016;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1093-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pinsent A, Read JM, Griffin JT, et al. Risk factors for UK Plasmodium falciparum cases. Malar J. 2014;13:298. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Selent M, de Rochars VM, Stanek D, et al. Malaria prevention knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among international flying pilots and flight attendants of a US commercial airline. J Travel Med. 2012;19:366–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2012.00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Newman RD, Parise ME, Barber AM, Steketee RW. Malaria-related deaths among U.S. travelers, 1963–2001. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:547–55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weber R, Schlagenhauf P, Amsler L, Steffen R. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of business travelers regarding malaria risk and prevention. J Travel Med. 2003;10:219–24. doi: 10.2310/7060.2003.40574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen LH, Wilson ME, Schlagenhauf P. Prevention of malaria in long-term travelers. JAMA. 2006;296:2234–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.18.2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diara M, Ngunjiri S. Malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance program: thinking inside the box. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12:303–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boggild AK, Castelli F, Gautret P, et al. Vaccine preventable diseases in returned international travelers: results from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Vaccine. 2010;28:7389–95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.ProMED. Yellow fever – China ex. [Accessed April 28, 2016];Angola. Archive Number: 20160424.4179477. Available at http://www.promedmail.org/
  • 20.Gautret P, Parola P. Rabies vaccination for international travelers. Vaccine. 2012;30:126–33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carrara P, Parola P, Brouqui P, Gautret P. Imported human rabies cases worldwide, 1990–2012. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steffen R, Hill DR, DuPont HL. Traveler’s diarrhea: a clinical review. JAMA. 2015;313:71–80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen LH, Han PV, Wilson ME, et al. Self-reported illness among Boston-area international travelers: a prospective study. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016;14:604–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hochedez P, Canestri A, Guihot A, Brichler S, Bricaire F, Caumes E. Management of travelers with fever and exanthema, notably dengue and chikungunya infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:710–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lederman ER, Weld LH, Elyazar IR, et al. Dermatologic conditions of the ill returned traveler: an analysis from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kemmerer TP, Cetron M, Harper L, Kozarsky PE. Health problems of corporate travelers: risk factors and management. J Travel Med. 1998;5:184–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1998.tb00504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pierre CM, Lim PL, Hamer DH. Expatriates: special considerations in pretravel preparation. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15:299–306. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0342-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cunningham J, Horsley J, Patel D, Tunbridge A, Lalloo DG. Compliance with long-term malaria prophylaxis in British expatriates. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12:341–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hamer DH, Ruffing R, Callahan MV, Lyons SH, Abdullah AS. Knowledge and use of measures to reduce health risks by corporate expatriate employees in western Ghana. J Travel Med. 2008;15:237–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Matteelli A, Schlagenhauf P, Carvalho AC, et al. Travel-associated sexually transmitted infections: an observational cross-sectional study of the GeoSentinel surveillance database. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:205–13. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70291-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Croughs M, Van Gompel A, de Boer E, Van Den, Ende J. Sexual risk behavior of travelers who consulted a pretravel clinic. J Travel Med. 2008;15:6–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lau JT, Wong WS. Behavioural surveillance of sexually-related risk behaviours for the cross-border traveller population in Hong Kong: the evaluation of the overall effectiveness of relevant prevention programmes by comparing the results of two surveillance surveys. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11:719–27. doi: 10.1258/0956462001915138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cabada MM, Montoya M, Echevarria JI, Verdonck K, Seas C, Gotuzzo E. Sexual behavior in travelers visiting Cuzco. J Travel Med. 2003;10:214–8. doi: 10.2310/7060.2003.40508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patel D. Occupational travel. Occup Med (Lond) 2011;61:6–18. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqq163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beny A, Paz A, Potasman I. Psychiatric problems in returning travelers: features and associations. J Travel Med. 2001;8:243–6. doi: 10.2310/7060.2001.24019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liese B, Mundt KA, Dell LD, Nagy L, Demure B. Medical insurance claims associated with international business travel. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54:499–503. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.7.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sand M, Bollenbach M, Sand D, et al. Epidemiology of aero-medical evacuation: an analysis of 504 cases. J Travel Med. 2010;17:405–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2010.00454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Toner S, Wiltens DHA, Berg J, et al. Medical evacuations in the oil and gas industry: a retrospective review with implications for future evacuation and preventative strategies. J Travel Med. 2017;24:1–7. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taw095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Druckman M, Harber P, Liu Y, Quigley RL. Country factors associated with the risk of hospitalization and aeromedical evacuation among expatriate workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:1118–25. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182677d75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES