Abstract
Mechanical birth-related injuries to the neonate are declining in incidence with advances in prenatal diagnosis and care. These injuries, however, continue to represent an important source of morbidity and mortality in the affected patient population. In the United States, these injuries are estimated to occur among 2.6% of births. Although more usual in context of existing feto-maternal risk factors, their occurrence can be unpredictable. While often superficial and temporary, functional and cosmetic sequelae, disability or even death can result as a consequence of birth-related injuries. The Agency for Healthcare research and quality (AHRQ) in the USA has developed, through expert consensus, patient safety indicators which include seven types of birth-related injuries including subdural and intracerebral hemorrhage, epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage, skeletal injuries, injuries to spine and spinal cord, peripheral and cranial nerve injuries and other types of specified and non-specified birth trauma. Understandably, birth-related injuries are a source of great concern for the parents and clinician. Many of these injuries have imaging manifestations. This article seeks to familiarize the reader with the clinical spectrum, significance and multimodality imaging appearances of neonatal multi-organ birth-related trauma and its sequelae, where applicable.
Teaching points
• Mechanical trauma related to birth usually occurs with pre-existing feto-maternal risk factors.
• Several organ systems can be affected; neurologic, musculoskeletal or visceral injuries can occur.
• Injuries can be mild and transient or disabling, even life-threatening.
• Imaging plays an important role in injury identification and triage of affected neonates.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s13244-017-0586-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Neonate, Mechanical trauma, Macrosomia, Instrumental delivery, Cephalopelvic disproportion
Introduction
The process of birth, whether spontaneous or assisted, is inherently traumatic for the newborn. Birth-related injuries encompass both mechanical and hypoxic-ischemic events. This review focuses mostly on mechanical trauma sustained by the neonate owing to the forces of labor and delivery. For conciseness of this review, birth-related hypoxic-ischemic injuries to the neonate will not be separately addressed.
Trauma related to birth may affect several organ systems of the neonate (ESM_1). The exact incidence of mechanical trauma of birth may be somewhat underestimated. Incidence is 0.82%, prevalence has been estimated at 9.5 per 1000 live births [1]. Less than 2% of neonatal deaths result from birth trauma [2].
Birth-related trauma can occur without identifiable risk factors; however, it is more common in context of predisposing feto-maternal risk factors. Risk factors can be fetal (macrosomia-birth weight > 4500 g, malpresentation or shoulder dystocia (defined as passage of more than 60 s between the delivery of the head and body [3], resulting in requirement of additional obstetric maneuvers for delivery of fetal shoulders [4])); maternal (diabetes, primiparity, small pelvis); or obstetric (epidural analgesia, induced or instrumental delivery).
Over the following paragraphs, we discuss the clinical context and imaging findings of birth -related injuries categorized by different portions of the neonate’s anatomy.
Injuries to the head and face
Extracranial
Scalp
The different layers of scalp are skin, subcutaneous connective tissue, galea aponeurotica, loose areolar connective tissue and periosteum. Normal anatomy of the scalp is depicted with illustrations (Fig. 1).
Hemorrhages may occur within different layers of the scalp and meninges (Fig. 2). The main categories of scalp hemorrhages include caput succedaneum (Fig. 3d-e), subgaleal hemorrhage (Fig. 3a-e) and cephalhematoma (Fig. 4a-d). These traumatic extracranial lesions each have their unique clinical presentation and course (ESM_2). The diagnosis is usually clinical; imaging plays a supplemental role. Majority of these hemorrhages spontaneously resolve with little clinical consequence. However, extensive blood loss into the subgaleal space can occasionally occur, which necessitates blood transfusion and surgical evacuation of the hematoma [5].
Skull
The neonatal skull is composed of multiple partially ossified bony and cartilaginous components separated by sutures, synchondroses and fontanels [6]. During its passage through the birth canal, the fetal head undergoes “molding” according to maternal pelvic dimensions (Fig. 5a-e). When the head is the presenting body part, the frontal and occipital bones are compressed, leading to parietal bones being displaced outward, resulting in a step-off between the coronal and lambdoid sutures and slight widening of the squamous suture [1]. With the less common breech, brow or face presentations, however, the parietal bones are pressed inward. In either instance, if the deformation occurs rapidly or severely, the falx, tentorium or bridging veins may tear, leading to intracranial hemorrhages [1]. Similarly, the process of molding may lead to distortion of synchondroses at the skull base, with long-term consequences such as basilar impression, atlanto-occipital assimilation or nuchal impression [1].
Skull fractures rarely occur with traumatic birth. The commonly described fracture patterns are linear (Fig. 6a), depressed (Fig. 6b,c) and occipital osteodiastasis (ESM_3). Neonatal depressed skull fracture implies inward buckling of the very soft neonatal skull and not bony discontinuity. Occipital osteodiastasis, implying separation of squamous and lateral portions of the developing occipital bone, occurs secondary to pubic symphyseal pressure against the suboccipital region, with breech infants especially vulnerable [1]. All these fractures can be associated with intra- and extra-cranial hematomas (Fig. 6b-d). CT with multiplanar and 3D reconstructions is an excellent tool for diagnosis of these fractures and associated hematomas, with MR considered if findings on CT do not offer sufficient explanation for patient’s symptoms [6].
Leptomeningeal cysts or growing fractures are a unique entity seen among children (Fig. 7a-c), where there is progressive enlargement of the fracture secondary to CSF pulsations from injured leptomeninges entrapped in the skull defect [6]. Bony edges of the fracture are smooth/scalloped [6]. Clinically, a scalp mass is appreciated. High resolution head ultrasound can be performed as the initial imaging, followed by CT or MRI [6].
Intracranial
Traumatic birth-related intracranial hemorrhages can occur both into the extra-axial spaces [epidural (Fig. 6b,c), subdural (Fig. 8a-c) and subarachnoid (Fig. 9a,b)] and within the cerebral or cerebellar parenchyma (Fig. 10a-d) (ESM_4). Besides large parenchymal bleeds, small cortical contusions and shear or axonal injuries may also be seen with birth-related trauma [7].
Rarely, arterial stroke can also result from either direct trauma to a large vascular structure, compression injury from a large extraaxial bleed or stretching of arteries from forces of labor and delivery (Fig. 11a-d) [6].
Based on a study of asymptomatic neonates following full-term spontaneous vaginal birth [8], the prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage was estimated to be 26%. These hemorrhages were not associated with signs of overt trauma. The majority of these hemorrhages were found to be subdural and infratentorial. These were found to be without clinical consequence [8, 9]. Also, these hemorrhages were all of the same age [8]. The pterion is a large, relatively unprotected sutural confluence, which makes this site vulnerable for injury [10]. MR is superior to CT for evaluation of extracerebral and posterior fossa hemorrhages [8]. Susceptibility weighted imaging is especially useful for delineation of both intra- and extraaxial hemorrhages [11]. Supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages are well seen and can be dated with both CT and MR, although ultrasound can be useful for initial bedside evaluation [6].
Face
Retinal hemorrhages are seen among one-quarter of otherwise normal deliveries, but instrumental delivery and cord around the neck have been identified as risk factors [12]. Spontaneous vaginal delivery, prolonged second stage of labor and neonatal intracranial hemorrhage can exacerbate these hemorrhages [12, 13]. In one prospective study [14], all detected birth-related retinal hemorrhages resolved by 1 month of age [14]. Coexistence of these hemorrhages with skull fractures/intracranial hemorrhages secondary to mechanical birth trauma can lead to confusion with nonaccidental trauma.
Passage through the birth canal may lead to facial trauma including mostly abrasions of the face, although traumatic luxation of the nose [15] and neonatal nasal septal deviation [16] have been reported as a consequence of birth-related trauma.
Injuries to the spinal cord and neck
Spinal cord injuries are rare conditions, which may occur in context of difficult delivery characterized by excess traction, rotation and hyperextension (Fig. 12a-c) [17]. Breech presentation complicated by entrapped fetal head has been found to be responsible for many reported cases [18]. Vertebral fractures or spinal dislocations can be associated [18]. A lateral radiograph of the spine should be obtained to demonstrate vertebral fracture/subluxation. The neonate can present with hypotonia, quadriplegia or paraplegia; plain radiographs, ultrasound and MRI can aid diagnosis [19]. Hematomyelia, disruption of the spine, extraspinal hematoma and malalignment may be seen by the initial radiograph/bedside ultrasound and MR can further facilitate assessment of edema, ischemia or hemorrhage [20, 21].
Forceful hyperextension of the neck can occasionally result in ligamentous injuries at the craniocervical junction [6].
Carotid dissection has been described as a rare accompaniment of dystocic labor [22]; CT, Doppler ultrasound and MR may all have a role in diagnosis [22]. CT and MR of the brain may reveal findings of a stroke involving a carotid vascular territory; color Doppler of the carotid may reveal an intravascular flap suggesting dissection [6].
Peripheral nerve injuries
Birth-related neonatal brachial plexus injuries can occur prepartum or intrapartum. Incidence of obstetric brachial plexus palsy has been estimated at about 1 to 1.5 per 1000 live births in the United States [23]. The commonest fetal risk factor is macrosomia [23]; however, any maternofetal condition predisposing to fetal trauma including maternal obesity, maternal diabetes or instrumental delivery can be implicated [24]. Clavicular fractures often co-exist with brachial plexus injuries [23]. Cesarean can be protective [24], but does not exclude the likelihood of a brachial plexus injury [25]. The normal anatomy of the brachial plexus has been illustrated (Fig. 13a).
Involvement of C5/6 results in Erb’s palsy and lack of Moro’s reflex, whereas involvement of C7/T1 results in Klumpke’s palsy (Fig. 13b-f) and lack of Moro and grasp reflexes. Additionally, injury to T1 sympathetic fibers can lead to Horner’s syndrome. Complete plexus injury results in atonic limb and Horner’s sign [6].
This entity most commonly affects the upper trunk nerve components of the brachial plexus (C5-T1) [26]. This results in stretching, or less commonly avulsion of nerve roots. Avulsions, when they occur, usually localize to the C5 and C6 nerve roots and clinically manifest as Erb’s palsy [27]. High resolution heavily T2-weighted MR can show a traumatic pseudomeningocele (Fig. 13b-e), absent rootlets or roots (Fig. 13d-e) and abnormal spinal cord signal [6, 27].
Ultrasound has a role in preoperative evaluation of postganglionic brachial plexus in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy; it demonstrated 68% sensitivity and 40% specificity for lower trunk involvement in a recent retrospective cohort study [28]. A small neuroma involving the upper trunk of the brachial plexus in an infant presenting with brachial plexus palsy was also recently described [29].
Over the long term, progressive glenohumeral deformity may result. A Swedish population-based study found persistent anomalies in approximately 25% patients with neonatal brachial plexus palsy [30]. These abnormalities include glenoid retroversion, posterior subluxation of humeral head, dysplastic glenoid cavity and dysmorphic and hypoplastic humeral head (Fig. 14a-g) among others [26]. MRI is the gold standard for glenohumeral joint evaluation, although ultrasound may be used for screening or for evaluating joint reduction in real-time [31].
Phrenic nerve palsy can occur as an accompaniment of traumatic brachial plexopathy. A retrospective review by Bowerson et al. [32] described the incidence of clinically significant phrenic nerve palsy in patients with brachial nerve palsy as 2.4%. Clinical manifestations may include respiratory compromise, lung infections, growth failure or even death [33]. Chest radiographs (Fig. 15) may reveal asymmetrical elevation of the affected diaphragm. Real-time chest ultrasound can accurately diagnose abnormal diaphragmatic motion on the affected side [34].
Radial nerve palsy can occur in context of a humeral shaft fracture [35].
Traumatic facial nerve injury can occur as a consequence of difficult extraction, particularly in context of forceps use. Prognosis for recovery is excellent; 90% recover completely [36].
Application of excessive traction to the head during breech delivery can result in unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and abductor paralysis. Left recurrent laryngeal nerve tends to be involved more often due to its longer course [37]. Prognosis for unilateral injuries is good, most usually resolve in 6 weeks, bilateral injuries tend to have a variable prognosis and some may require tracheostomy.
Musculoskeletal injuries
Musculoskeletal injuries encompass both bony fractures and soft tissue injuries. Birth-related fractures in the newborn period, though overall rare, are important to recognize due to non-specific signs or symptoms, increased likelihood of missing them due to unossified cartilage and necessity of differentiating these from abusive trauma. These include fractures of both flat and long bones [38].
Clavicular fractures (Fig. 16) can occur with dystocic birth or with forceps delivery. Incidence is 2.7–5.7/1000 live births [6]. They can coexist with humeral fractures, traumatic brachial plexopathy and injuries to the phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerve [6]. Besides the clavicle, fractures of other flat bones such as ribs, mandible and spine have also been described in the literature [6, 7].
Rib fractures have been described to be associated with dystocic birth. Based on a recent case series, birth-related rib fractures tend to be mid-posterior in location [39].
Humeral fractures can involve the humeral shaft (Fig. 17a) or the proximal or distal epiphyses [40]. Chondroepiphyseal separation of the distal humerus (classed at Salter I injury, Fig. 17b-d) can occur as a consequence of excessive traction on the upper extremity which may accompany a dystocic birth or one complicated by cephalopelvic disproportion [41]. The neonate can present with swelling/ pain and limitation of elbow movement, which is an important differentiating feature from the hypomobility of brachial plexus palsy. Also, a “muffled” crepitus can be present between the cartilaginous epiphysis and distal humerus [42]. Since unossified cartilage cannot be seen radiographically, these injuries are better appreciated by ultrasound. Alternatively, these injuries can be well seen by MR [42].
Femur fractures (Fig. 18a) though rare (incidence of 0.13 per 1000 live births) can occur in context of excessive traction on the femur; the most common manifestation being spiral fractures involving femoral shaft. Transphyseal fractures through the distal femur have also been described as a rare manifestation of birth trauma (Fig. 18b) [43]. Operative birth has been found to be associated with an increased incidence of these fractures, due to scarce available room for maneuvering with Cesarean births [44].
Sternocleidomastoid hematomas can be seen with a dystocic birth [45]. Alternatively, birth-trauma related venous ischemia of the sternocleidomastoid muscle has been postulated to result in benign fibroblastic proliferation of sternocleidomastoid muscle, also known as fibromatosis colli (Fig. 19) [46]. Usually unilateral with a right-sided predilection, this entity manifests between the first 4–8 weeks of life as a neck mass or torticollis [46]. Ultrasound (Fig. 19) is the imaging study of choice and demonstrates fusiform enlargement and heterogeneous echogenicity of the affected sternocleidomastoid muscle, which may appear “masslike” [46]. Biopsy is not universally recommended; most infants respond to physical therapy. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is appropriate when the etiology of such a lesion is not clear or other diagnostic possibilities are also being considered. FNAC will show bland-appearing fibroblasts, degenerative, atrophic skeletal muscle, and muscle giant cells without inflammatory cells [47].
Operative intervention or botulinum toxin injection are considered in the rare circumstance where physical therapy fails [46].
Visceral injuries
Of the visceral organs affected by trauma, injuries to the liver [48, 49], spleen, kidney, adrenals and trachea have been described [50]. Neonatal adrenal hemorrhage (Fig. 20a, b) is rare and can be an important manifestation of birth-related mechanical trauma, found in only 0.2% of newborns.
Tracheal rupture can be anterior subglottic or distal tracheal in location. This rare and potentially fatal entity can occur in context of dystocic birth, and should be promptly suspected in neonates who develop subcutaneous emphysema or pneumomediastinum shortly after birth [51, 52]. Bronchoscopy should be expeditiously performed, and open surgical repair undertaken if necessary, especially in cases of distal tracheal rupture [51].
Conclusion
Mechanical trauma related to birth can affect different organ systems of the neonate. While often of little clinical consequence, traumatic events can lead to cosmetic deformity, functional impairment and in extreme circumstances, even death. Imaging is important for detection, assignment of prognostic significance and follow-up, making it important for radiologists to be familiar with the imaging manifestations of these entities and their sequelae.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Margaret Kowaluk, Nadezhda Kiriyak and Gwen Mack from the Graphics Section, Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester NY, USA for their help with radiographic images and original artwork in this article.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s13244-017-0586-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Rabelo NN, Matushita H, Cardeal DD. Traumatic brain lesions in newborns. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(3):180–188. doi: 10.1590/0004-282x20170016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reichard R. Birth injury of the cranium and central nervous system. Brain Pathol. 2008;18(4):565–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hansen A, Chauhan SP. Shoulder dystocia: definitions and incidence. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(4):184–188. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gherman RB, et al. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):657–672. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kichari JR, Gielkens H. Massive traumatic subgaleal haematoma. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(4):344. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huisman TA, et al. Parturitional injury of the head and neck. J Neuroimaging. 2015;25(2):151–166. doi: 10.1111/jon.12144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tekes A, Pinto PS, Huisman TA. Birth-related injury to the head and cervical spine in neonates. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19(4):777–790. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Looney CB, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic neonates: prevalence on MR images and relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factors. Radiology. 2007;242(2):535–541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422060133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Whitby EH, et al. Low field strength magnetic resonance imaging of the neonatal brain. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(3):F203–F208. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.3.F203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang AH, Robertson RL. Spontaneous superficial parenchymal and leptomeningeal hemorrhage in term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(3):469–475. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meoded A, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging of the neonatal brain. Clin Radiol. 2012;67(8):793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yanli Z, et al. Risk factors affecting the severity of full-term neonatal retinal hemorrhage. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4231489. doi: 10.1155/2017/4231489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Watts P, et al. Newborn retinal hemorrhages: a systematic review. J AAPOS. 2013;17(1):70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Laghmari M, et al. Birth-related retinal hemorrhages in the newborn: incidence and relationship with maternal, obstetric and neonatal factors. Prospective study of 2,031 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014;37(4):313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Luers JC, et al. Traumatic luxation of the nose in a newborn: case report and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(9):1489–1493. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0808-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lawlor CM, et al. Neonatal nasal septal deviation: two cases of successful early surgical intervention. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96(8):E20–E23. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Towbin A. Central nervous system damage in the human fetus and newborn infant. Mechanical and hypoxic injury incurred in the fetal-neonatal period. Am J Dis Child. 1970;119(6):529–542. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1970.02100050531015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vialle R, et al. Birth-related spinal cord injuries: a multicentric review of nine cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(1):79–85. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0437-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vialle R, et al. Spinal cord injuries at birth: a multicenter review of nine cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(6):435–440. doi: 10.1080/14767050701288325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lanska MJ, Roessmann U, Wiznitzer M. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cord birth injury. Pediatrics. 1990;85(5):760–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Surendrababu NR, Rao A. Clinical image. Transection of the spinal cord: a rare birth-related trauma. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(7):719. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0141-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hamida N, et al. Neonatal cervical artery dissection secondary to birth trauma. Arch Pediatr. 2014;21(2):201–205. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alfonso DT. Causes of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69(1):11–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Freeman MD, Goodyear SM, Leith WM. A multistate population-based analysis of linked maternal and neonatal discharge records to identify risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus injury. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136(3):331–336. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.al-Qattan MM, et al. Obstetrical brachial plexus injury in newborn babies delivered by caesarean section. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(2):263–265. doi: 10.1016/S0266-7681(96)80112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chagas-Neto FA, et al. Imaging assessment of glenohumeral dysplasia secondary to brachial plexus birth palsy. Radiol Bras. 2016;49(3):144–149. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tharin BD, et al. Brachial plexopathy: a review of traumatic and nontraumatic causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):W67–W75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Somashekar DK, et al. Utility of ultrasound in noninvasive preoperative workup of neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(5):695–703. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Joseph JR, et al. Ultrasonography for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(5):527–531. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.PEDS14108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sjoberg I, Erichs K, Bjerre I. Cause and effect of obstetric (neonatal) brachial plexus palsy. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77(3):357–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1988.tb10660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Donohue KW, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of Glenohumeral dysplasia in brachial plexus birth palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(2):123–132. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bowerson M, Nelson VS, Yang LJ. Diaphragmatic paralysis associated with neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;42(3):234–236. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Balachander B, et al. Looking beyond brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr. 2014;165(3):635. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.04.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.de Toledo J. S, et al. Diagnosis of abnormal diaphragm motion after cardiothoracic surgery: ultrasound performed by a cardiac intensivist vs. fluoroscopy. Congenit Heart Dis. 2010;5(6):565–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shao YC, et al. Radial nerve palsy associated with fractures of the shaft of the humerus: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(12):1647–1652. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reddy S, Redett R. Facial paralysis in children. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31(2):117–122. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cloherty JP, Stark AR, Eichenwald EC (2004) Manual of neonatal care. Lippincrott
- 38.Al-Habdan I. Birth-related fractures of long bones. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(12):959–960. doi: 10.1007/BF02723819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.van Rijn RR, Bilo RA, Robben SG. Birth-related mid-posterior rib fractures in neonates: a report of three cases (and a possible fourth case) and a review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(1):30–34. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sherr-Lurie N, et al. Fractures of the humerus in the neonatal period. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;13(6):363–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Catena N, Senes FM. Obstetrical chondro-epiphyseal separation of the distal humerus: a case report and review of literature. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(4):418–419. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sabat D, Maini L, Gautam VK. Neonatal separation of distal humeral epiphysis during caesarean section: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011;19(3):376–378. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jain R, Bielski RJ. Fracture of lower femoral epiphysis in an infant at birth: a rare obstetrical injury. J Perinatol. 2001;21(8):550–552. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kancherla R, et al. Birth-related femoral fracture in newborns: risk factors and management. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(3):177–180. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0412-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Habek D. Fetal shoulder dystocia. Acta Med Croatica. 2002;56(2):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sargar KM, et al. Pediatric fibroblastic and Myofibroblastic tumors: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2016;36(4):1195–1214. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rajalakshmi V, Selvambigai G (2009) Jaiganesh Cytomorphology of fibromatosis colli. J Cytol 26(1):41–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Hartman BJ, Van Der Zee DC, Duval EL. Unexpected birth trauma with near fatal consequences. Eur J Emerg Med. 2000;7(2):151–154. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200006000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Share JC, Pursley D, Teele RL. Unsuspected hepatic injury in the neonate--diagnosis by ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol. 1990;20(5):320–322. doi: 10.1007/BF02013163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parker LA. Part 2: birth trauma: injuries to the intraabdominal organs, peripheral nerves, and skeletal system. Adv Neonatal Care. 2006;6(1):7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Siegel B, Bent JP, Weinstein S. Tracheal rupture in complicated delivery: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(10):1784–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ammari AN, et al. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum as presenting manifestations of neonatal tracheal injury. J Perinatol. 2002;22(6):499–501. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.