Skip to main content
Development (Cambridge, England) logoLink to Development (Cambridge, England)
. 2018 Jan 1;145(1):dev159905. doi: 10.1242/dev.159905

Wnt inhibition promotes vascular specification of embryonic cardiac progenitors

David E Reichman 1, Laura Park 1, Limor Man 1, David Redmond 2, Kenny Chao 1, Richard P Harvey 3,4,5, Makoto M Taketo 6, Zev Rosenwaks 1, Daylon James 1,7,*
PMCID: PMC5825863  PMID: 29217753

ABSTRACT

Several studies have demonstrated a multiphasic role for Wnt signaling during embryonic cardiogenesis and developed protocols that enrich for cardiac derivatives during in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). However, few studies have investigated the role of Wnt signaling in the specification of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) toward downstream fates. Using transgenic mice and hPSCs, we tracked endothelial cells (ECs) that originated from CPCs expressing NKX2.5. Analysis of EC-fated CPCs at discrete phenotypic milestones during hPSC differentiation identified reduced Wnt activity as a hallmark of EC specification, and the enforced activation or inhibition of Wnt reduced or increased, respectively, the degree of vascular commitment within the CPC population during both hPSC differentiation and mouse embryogenesis. Wnt5a, which has been shown to exert an inhibitory influence on Wnt signaling during cardiac development, was dynamically expressed during vascular commitment of hPSC-derived CPCs, and ectopic Wnt5a promoted vascular specification of hPSC-derived and mouse embryonic CPCs.

KEY WORDS: Cardiac development, Cardiac differentiation, Wound healing, Myocardial infarction, Myocardial scar formation, Endothelial differentiation, Human embryonic stem cells, Cardiovascular progenitor, Wnt signaling, Non-canonical Wnt, Wnt5a, Mouse


Summary: Non-canonical inhibitory Wnt signaling via Wnt5a fosters endothelial differentiation of Nkx2.5+ cardiac progenitor cells during mouse embryogenesis and human pluripotent stem cell differentiation.

INTRODUCTION

One out of every three deaths in the USA results from cardiovascular disease (Roger et al., 2012). Despite the epidemic scale of predisposing conditions (hypertension, smoking, obesity), major advances in the surgical treatment of cardiovascular disease have plateaued. Regenerative therapies represent a promising alternative to surgical and/or pharmacological interventions for cardiovascular disease, but wound healing mechanisms unique to the heart undermine the restorative contribution of endogenous or exogenous cells (Cleutjens et al., 1999). Autologous, tissue-resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) have demonstrated modest benefit upon transplantation into patients following myocardial infarction (MI) (Bolli et al., 2011; Chugh et al., 2012), and cardiomyocytes differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and transplanted into small animal models of MI have shown favorable results (Laflamme et al., 2007; Shiba et al., 2012). However, non-fatal ventricular arrhythmias have been noted in non-human primates engrafted with hPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (Chong et al., 2014), underscoring the challenge of achieving ordered intercalation of exogenous cells into injured cardiac tissue.

Redirection of cardiac wound healing processes in adult hearts might be a favorable approach for improving cardiac function following ischemic injury. Adult zebrafish and neonatal mice are capable of undergoing constructive heart regeneration (Uygur and Lee, 2016), and recapitulation of these processes to redirect cell fate could promote more constructive, pro-angiogenic wound healing. Indeed, recent work has demonstrated the potential of this approach in mouse models of cardiac ischemia (Zangi et al., 2013), and other studies have identified novel mediators of cardiac regenerative processes that might be exploited in injured heart. Yet, relatively little is known of the signaling pathways that drive vascular fate within the CPC population in embryogenesis or adulthood.

Among the signal transduction pathways that play a prominent role in cardiac development and differentiation, the Wnt pathway has been extensively studied. Since early experiments in chick (Marvin et al., 2001) and frog (Schneider and Mercola, 2001) showed that inhibition of Wnt is necessary for induction of cardiogenesis, many groups have confirmed that naturally occurring and synthetic Wnt inhibitors can drive the differentiation of NKX2.5+ populations in mouse embryos and pluripotent stem cell cultures (Elliott et al., 2011; Lian et al., 2012; Naito et al., 2006; Paige et al., 2010; Qyang et al., 2007; Willems et al., 2011). Collectively, these studies have demonstrated a multiphasic role for Wnt signaling in cardiac fate choice determination (Gessert and Kuhl, 2010): activation of Wnt is required during gastrulation for induction of cardiac mesoderm, while inhibition of Wnt signaling later enables differentiation of cardiac progenitors. Recent studies have demonstrated a further role for canonical Wnt signaling in the specification of epicardial progenitor cells from NKX2.5+ precursors (Iyer et al., 2016; Witty et al., 2014); however, few studies have specifically addressed the role of Wnt signaling in the designation of endothelial cell (EC) fate; GSK3β inhibitors have been used in chemically defined medium to robustly induce differentiation of CD34+ CD31 (PECAM1)+ endothelial progenitors from hPSCs (Bao et al., 2015; Lian et al., 2014), and a high-content screening assay identified numerous pharmacological inhibitors of Wnt that promoted the differentiation of cardiomyocytes, and no other mesodermal derivative, from hPSCs (Willems et al., 2011). Yet these studies incorporated Wnt inhibition into heterogeneous cultures of differentiating hPSCs during a relatively early and/or broad temporal window. As such, the function of Wnt specifically in the designation of cardiac EC, myocardial, smooth muscle or fibroblast fate from multipotent CPCs remains unclear.

Here, we have generated a dual reporting hPSC line that identifies NKX2.5+ (cardiac) and VE-cadherin (CDH5)+ (endothelial) derivatives during differentiation. Utilizing this line and a cross of vascular [Flk1-GFP (Ema et al., 2006)] and cardiac [Nkx2.5Cre (Stanley et al., 2002)] mouse reporter strains, we specifically identified and tracked ECs that originated from cardiac progenitors in vitro and in vivo. Expression analysis and live monitoring of Wnt activity during hPSC differentiation and in vivo cardiogenesis revealed a correlation between reduced Wnt activity and acquisition of EC identity, and inhibition of Wnt signaling promoted vascular specification of hPSC-derived and mouse embryonic CPCs. Finally, gain-of-function experiments in hPSC cultures and mouse embryos revealed a function for WNT5A, the non-canonical Wnt effector, in the vascular specification of CPCs. These data elucidate a novel influence on EC specification from cardiac-specific progenitors and identify Wnt signal inhibition via WNT5A as a potential driver of neovascularization in the developing heart.

RESULTS

Demarcation of vascular commitment from NKX2.5-expressing hPSC derivatives

To enable live tracking and longitudinal analysis of cardiac and endothelial fate acquisition in an experimentally tractable in vitro model, we applied an EC-specific transgenic labeling strategy based on the CDH5 promoter [VPr (James et al., 2010)] to the cardiac-specific hPSC line NKX2.5eGFP/w (Elliott et al., 2011) (Fig. 1A). Differentiation of this line in conditions that promote cardiovascular cell fate (Lian et al., 2012; Paige et al., 2010; Willems et al., 2011) resulted in regions in which both reporters were enriched (Fig. 1B), and flow cytometry corroborated the presence of NKX2.5GFP+ ECs. Indeed, live tracking of hPSC differentiation over 48 h from day 8 to 10 revealed a progressive decrease in single-positive NKX2.5GFP+ VPrneg cells as the double-positive NKX2.5GFP+ VPrmOrange+ population increased (Fig. 1C-E, Movies 1,2). This approach enabled the live tracking and analysis of three unique populations via microscopy and flow cytometry: NKX2.5+ VPrneg CD31neg cardiac progenitors/cardiomyocytes (CP/CM, green); NKX2.5+ VPr+ CD31+ ECs (NkxEC, red); and NKX2.5neg VPr+ CD31+ ECs that no longer express NKX2.5 or never did (nECs, blue) (Fig. 1F).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Demarcation of vascular commitment from NKX2.5-expressing hPSC derivatives. (A) The NKX2.5eGFP/w hPSC line was targeted with lentiviral particles encoding VPrmOrange, an EC-specific promoter sequence driving mOrange fluorescent protein. (B) Following 10 days of serum-free differentiation, a colony of hPSC derivatives was scanned by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown at higher magnification to the right. Arrows indicate endothelial cells that are also GFP positive. Arrowheads indicate cells that are single positive for the NKX2.5-GFP reporter. (C-E) Live images of differentiation cultures were captured in sequential time-lapse culture from days 8 to 10; representative populations isolated from differentiation at day 10 are shown (D) and quantification of NKX2.5+ VPrneg (green), NKX2.5neg VPr+ (blue) and NKX2.5+ VPr+ (red) pixel density is shown (E). Coloc, colocalization. (F) Dual reporting hPSCs enable identification of unique populations that represent successive stages in the developmental hierarchy of cardiac endothelial specification. Scale bars: B, 100 µm; D, 1 mm.

Nkx2.5-expressing progenitors contribute significantly to endocardial ECs

To establish a complementary lineage-tracing strategy in the mouse that specifically distinguishes ECs that arise from Nkx2.5-expressing (NkxEC) versus non-Nkx2.5-expressing (nEC) compartments, we crossed Flk1-GFP mice (Ema et al., 2006) with RosatdTom (Madisen et al., 2010) and Nkx2.5Cre (Stanley et al., 2002) strains. NkxECs were observed in the cardiac crescent (Fig. 2A) and endocardium (Fig. 2B), and made up a large proportion of endocardial ECs in sections of embryonic day (E) 11.5 heart (Fig. 2C), with colocalization masking (spatial overlap of cardiac and vascular-specific reporter signals) in respective cardiac chambers revealing an increased ratio of NkxECs in ventricles (Fig. 2D). To determine whether NkxECs are present in other organs during development, we isolated organs at E12.5 and enzymatically dissociated them into single-cell suspensions. Flow cytometry revealed a substantial population of tdTom+ cells in liver and lung; however, the NkxEC population was exclusively observed in the heart (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Nkx2.5-expressing progenitors contribute significantly to endocardial ECs. (A,B) Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mouse embryos were isolated at E7.75 (A) and E8.5 (B), enabling specific identification of cells derived from Nkx2.5-expressing progenitors (red) and ECs (green). In B, arrows indicate myocardium and arrowheads indicate endocardium. (C,D) Cryosections of E11.5 heart with colocalization masking enabling quantification of the NkxEC:nEC ratio. (E) Organs isolated from Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom embryos at E12.5 were dissociated and the distribution of NkxECs (green) and CD45+ cells (blue) was quantified within the tdTomato+ population (red). LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; Nuc, nuclei staining. Scale bars: 100 µm.

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of NkxECs reveals reduced Wnt activation and a tip cell phenotype

Resolution of hPSC derivatives precisely at the interface of CPC and NkxEC fate enables identification of candidate signaling pathways that might play an inductive role in vascular specification within the heart. To define molecular hallmarks that are unique to NkxECs and identify signaling pathways that play a role in the specification of endocardial fate, we compared RNA-seq profiles of human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) with that of CP/CMs, NkxECs and nECs at day 7 of differentiation (Fig. 3). Three biological replicates of each population were isolated by FACS for RNA isolation and sequencing and an expression MDS plot revealed clear differentiation between all four populations (Fig. 3A), with direct comparison of NkxECs with nECs revealing the unique character of NkxECs. Among the top 100 genes upregulated in NkxECs (Fig. 3B) were numerous genes that have been linked to Notch signaling/tip cell phenotype (del Toro et al., 2010). Additionally, among transcripts known to be related to Wnt signaling (KEGG database), CP/CMs were highly enriched for targets of canonical Wnt (arrowheads, Fig. 3C) as well as canonical and non-canonical inhibitors (asterisks, Fig. 3C), all of which were significantly reduced upon acquisition of NkxEC fate.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

RNA-seq of NkxECs reveals reduced Wnt activation and tip cell phenotype. (A) RNA-seq was performed on biological triplicate samples of HUVECs, CP/CMs, NkxECs and nECs; an expression MDS plot showing clear differentiation between the four cell types is shown. (B) Heatmap showing the top 100 genes that were upregulated in NkxECs relative to nECs. (C) Heatmap showing a KEGG list of Wnt pathway components with transcripts listed according to log fold change (FC) of CP/CMs over NkxECs. Asterisks (B) specify genes known to be highly expressed in endothelial tip cells or (C) specify Wnt effectors known to play an inhibitory function. Arrowheads (C) specify canonical Wnt target genes. P<1×10−5 for all transcripts in B; the dashed boxes (C) shows transcripts that are significantly increased (upper) or decreased (lower) in CP/CMs relative to NkxECs (P<0.05).

Enforced Wnt inhibition promotes NkxEC fate from hPSC-derived CPCs

To address the role of Wnt during vascular commitment of hPSC-derived CPCs, we augmented published protocols for cardiovascular differentiation by extending 2 days of Wnt inhibition to 5 days (Fig. 4A). Relative to control conditions, prolonged Wnt inhibition promoted an increased proportion of NkxECs and total ECs at the expense of CP/CMs (Fig. 4B,C). To isolate the effect of Wnt signal inhibition on the NKX2.5-expressing progenitor population, we purified CP/CMs by FACS at day 7 and exposed them to pharmacological modulators of Wnt signaling in escalating concentrations (Fig. 4D). Inhibition (Endo-IWR1) or activation (CHIR99021) of Wnt signaling increased or decreased, respectively, the percentage of ECs within the CP/CM-derived population. An alternative inhibitor of Wnt signaling, XAV-939, also increased the percentage of ECs arising from isolated CP/CMs (Fig. 4E).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Enforced Wnt inhibition promotes NkxEC fate from hPSC-derived CPCs. (A-C) hPSCs were sequentially stimulated with factors that promote cardiovascular differentiation with the Wnt inhibitor Endo-IWR1 included for 2 days (days 2-4) or for an extended period (days 2-7). Colored contour plots showing representative flow cytometry measurements of the two conditions at day 7 (B) and quantification of the CP/CM, NkxEC and nEC populations (C). (D) CP/CMs were isolated at day 7 of differentiation and cultured for an additional 5 days in different concentrations of Endo-IWR1 or CHIR99021. The percentage of CD31+ cells in resultant cultures was determined by flow cytometry. (E) Day 7 CP/CMs were isolated and cultured in increasing concentrations of the Wnt inhibitor XAV-939. The percentage of CD31+ cells was quantified after 5 days. (F,G) CP/CMs were isolated at day 7 (F) or 10 (G) of differentiation and plated at clonal density. Clones exhibiting the presence of EC derivatives after 6 days were quantified in response to control, CHIR99021 or Endo-IWR1 conditions. Error bars represent s.d. between eight (C) or six (D,E) biological replicates or (F,G) between three groups of clones with the aggregate number of clones for all three groups shown beneath the bar. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, relative to control conditions.

The gold standard for demonstration of multipotency and lineage selection in cell culture is isolation and tracking of single-cell clones. To test the effect of Wnt signal inhibition at a clonal level, we distributed CP/CMs at serial dilution into culture conditions in which Wnt signaling was activated or inhibited (Fig. 4F,G). FACS deposition (see Materials and Methods) resulted in clonal outgrowths from 10.2% and 8.6% of cells isolated from day 7 (Fig. 4F) and 10 (Fig. 4G) of differentiation, respectively, and these cells were split into three groups that were cultured in medium containing VEGFA alone or combined with CHIR99021 or Endo-IWR1. After 6 days, clonal outgrowths were assessed for EC content. The percentage of clones containing ECs was significantly lower for CP/CMs isolated at day 10, perhaps reflecting a reduced volume of CPCs within the CP/CM population at later stages. Importantly, the percentage of clones that contained ECs was lower following Wnt activation at either time point, and although the percentage of EC-containing clones was only slightly increased following Wnt inhibition, it is possible that plating cells at clonal density effectively eliminates the paracrine signaling impetus present in multicellular culture, resulting in de facto Wnt inhibition under these conditions.

Cardiac-specific gain/loss of Wnt function modulates vascular fate in vivo

To determine whether Wnt signaling is linked to cardiac EC specification in vivo, we crossed TCF/Lef:H2B-GFP mice (Ferrer-Vaquer et al., 2010), which provide single-cell resolution of Wnt signaling status, with a strain carrying an EC-specific Cre recombinase [VEC-Cre (Chen et al., 2009), referred to here as Cdh5Cre] and RosatdTom (Madisen et al., 2010). Within the cardiac crescent of these embryos at ∼E8.0 (Fig. 5A), Wnt was variably activated; however, nascent ECs were uniformly negative for H2B-GFP, apart from rare cells (arrow, Fig. 5A) in which H2B-GFP was faintly observed. Wnt activation and EC identity were also mutually exclusive upon establishment of endocardial ECs at E8.5 (Fig. 5B) and later in ECs within the ventricles of the E11.5 heart (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Cardiac-specific gain/loss of Wnt function modulates vascular fate in vivo. (A-C) Whole-mount confocal images of TCF/Lef:H2B-GFP;Cdh5Cre;RosatdTom mouse embryos at E8.0 (A) and E8.5 (B) and isolated heart at E11.5 (C). Arrowheads (A-C) indicate ECs; arrows indicate (A) an EC that is faintly positive for TCF/Lef:H2B-GFP or (B,C) TCF/Lef:H2B-GFP+ cells. (D,E) The β-cateninLOF strain was crossed with Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mice to generate embryos with heterozygous and homozygous ablation of β-catenin. z-stack projections are compared (D) and sagittal and coronal sections are shown (E). (F) The percentage of NkxECs was quantified for the left and right ventricles of β-cateninLOF versus heterozygous littermates. Error bars represent s.d. between five biological replicates. *P<0.05. (G,H) β-cateninGOF males were crossed with Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom females to generate embryos with constitutively active Wnt signaling in the heart. β-cateninGOF embryos versus control littermates are shown at E9.0 and E9.5 (G) and total EC number and percentage NkxECs were measured for ventricles, atria and outflow tract of β-cateninGOF versus control littermate hearts between E8.5 and E9.5 (H). Scale bars: A-E,G, 100 µm.

To measure the effect of cardiac-specific gain or loss of Wnt function on the NkxEC:nEC ratio, we crossed Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mice with Ctnnb1Exon3 mice (Harada et al., 1999) (β-cateninGOF) and Ctnnb1flox/flox mice (Brault et al., 2001) (β-cateninLOF). At E11.5, β-cateninLOF embryos were grossly normal, but showed malformed atria, reduced ventricular cell density and septal defects (Fig. 5D,E, Movie 3). Quantification of EC volume in cryosections revealed an increased percentage of NkxECs in the right ventricle (Fig. 5F). β-cateninGOF embryos were grossly aberrant at E11.5 (Movie 4) and clear differences relative to control littermates began to manifest at E9.0, with affected embryos exhibiting smaller size, defective heart looping and reduced vascular density within the heart (Fig. 5G, Movies 5,6). In contrast to the increased percentage of NkxECs present in β-cateninLOF hearts, β-cateninGOF hearts showed the reverse trend beginning at E9.0, with a significantly reduced total EC number and proportion of NkxECs in ventricles, atria and outflow tract of looping hearts (Fig. 5H).

Non-canonical Wnts promote vascular specification of hPSC-derived CP/CMs

In search of physiological influences that govern vascular specification within the heart, we examined global transcriptional analysis of NkxECs. In addition to downstream targets of Wnt activation, the two major ligands that mediate a non-canonical inhibitory influence on Wnt signaling, WNT5A and WNT11, were enriched in CP/CMs (Fig. 3C). Based on these data we hypothesized that non-canonical paracrine signaling elaborated by the expanding pool of CP/CMs might function to inhibit Wnt activation, thereby balancing proliferation with vascular specification. To test this, we FACS isolated CP/CMs at day 6 and cultured them in the presence of recombinant WNT5A and WNT11. Similarly to Endo-IWR1, CP/CMs cultured with WNT5A and WNT11 generated significantly increased CD31+ ECs at the expense of NKX2.5+ CD31neg derivatives at 3 and 6 days post isolation (Fig. 6A,B).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Non-canonical Wnt signaling promotes vascular specification of hPSC-derived CPCs. (A,B) The CP/CM population was isolated at day 6 and cultured in the presence of CHIR99021, Endo-IWR1 or recombinant WNT5A or WNT11; the total number of NKX2.5GFP+ CD31neg and CD31+ cells was quantified after 3 (A) and 6 (B) days. (C) The CP/CM population was isolated at day 6 of differentiation and transduced with lentiviral particles containing a luciferase reporter driven by a TCF/Lef-based promoter; the activity of the reporter within NKX2.5GFP+ CD31neg derivatives was measured after 4 days. (D-F) CP/CMs were isolated at day 6 of differentiation and incubated with CellTracker reagent to monitor cell proliferation; after 6 days in various growth conditions, the mean fluorescent intensity of the CellTracker reagent was measured among NKX2.5GFP+ CD31neg and CD31+ derivatives. (E,F) Following 3 or 6 days of CP/CM culture in various conditions, the mean fluorescent intensity of FLK1 was measured on NKX2.5GFP+ CD31neg (E) and CD31+ (F) derivatives. (G-I) Endogenous WNT5A transcript level was reduced in hPSCs using lentiviral shRNA (G), resulting in a reduced percentage of ECs among hPSC derivatives (H) and a reduced proportion of ECs within the NKX2.5GFP+ population (I). Error bars represent s.d. between six (A-F) or five (G-I) biological replicates. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Supporting the inhibitory effect of these non-canonical ligands on Wnt activation status, CP/CMs transduced with a lentiviral reporter based on the Wnt-responsive TCF/Lef promoter element exhibited a decrease in activity in the presence of WNT5A and WNT11 that was comparable to that caused by Endo-IWR1 (Fig. 6C). Expansion of CP/CM-derived ECs in the presence of WNT5A and Wnt11 did not occur via proliferative expansion, as CellTracker reagent introduced into CP/CMs upon their isolation was retained at levels equal to that of the control (Fig. 6D). However, surface expression of FLK1 was increased in response to WNT5A, resulting in increased mean fluorescence intensity of signal in resultant ECs (Fig. 6E,F). Finally, knockdown of endogenous WNT5A via lentiviral shRNA during hPSC differentiation (Fig. 6G) decreased the percentage of total ECs among differentiated derivatives (Fig. 6H), while increasing the yield of CP/CMs at the expense of NkxECs within the NKX2.5GFP+ population (Fig. 6I).

Wnt5a gain of function enhances vascular specification of Nkx2.5-expressing CPCs

To elaborate on in vivo gain- and loss-of-function experiments (Fig. 5) and assess the role of non-canonical Wnt signaling in directing vascular fate of CPCs, we crossed Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mice with the Igs1tm6(CAG-Bgeo,-Wnt5a)Nat (Wnt5aGOF; see Materials and Methods) and Wnt5aflox/flox (Ryu et al., 2013) strains, enabling constitutive expression or deletion of Wnt5a in Nkx2.5-expressing cells and their derivatives (Fig. 7). Live-born pups containing Nkx2.5Cre and Wnt5aGOF or Wnt5aflox/flox alleles were not observed (data not shown). Examination of E12.5 Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom;Wnt5aGOF embryos revealed malformed atria, reduced ventricular cell density and septal defects (Fig. 7A, Movie 7). Quantification of ECs via colocalization masking in the ventricles of mutant versus wild-type littermates revealed an increased ratio of NkxECs in Wnt5aGOF hearts (Fig. 7B), whereas the incidence of mitotic cells in Wnt5aGOF hearts was reduced (Fig. 7C). Notably, Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom;Wnt5aflox/flox analyzed at E13.5 also exhibited septal defects and aberrant development of the right ventricle (Fig. 7D), but the relative enrichment of NkxECs observed in the context of Wnt5aGOF was reversed (Fig. 7E). However, the reduction in NkxECs in ventricles of Wnt5aflox/flox hearts was not significant and proliferation was not affected (Fig. 7F), suggesting potential compensation for loss of Wnt5a by the closely related Wnt11.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Wnt5a gain of function enhances vascular specification of Nkx2.5-expressing CPCs. (A-C) Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mice were crossed with the Wnt5aGOF strain. Whole-mount and coronal views of control and Wnt5aGOF hearts at E12.5 (A), and the percentage of NkxECs (B) and frequency of phospho-histone H3-positive cells per field (C) were quantified in control and Wnt5aGOF hearts. (D-F) Flk1-GFP;Nkx2.5Cre;RosatdTom mice were crossed with the Wnt5aflox/flox strain. Whole-mount and coronal views of Wnt5aWT/flox and Wnt5aflox/flox hearts at E13.5 (D), and the percentage of NkxECs (E) and frequency of phospho-histone H3-positive cells per field (F) were quantified in Wnt5aWT/flox and Wnt5aflox/flox hearts. Error bars represent s.d. between five biological replicates; in C,F counting 1 out of every 12 sections (10 µm thickness). Colocalization threshold masks denoting NkxECs (red) and nECs (green) are shown (A,D), with merged fluorescence images shown in the inset. Regions within dashed boxes (A,D) are magnified to the right. Asterisks indicate septal defects in mutant mice. Scale bars: 100 µm.

DISCUSSION

Owing to the multiphasic influence of the Wnt pathway during embryogenesis, as well as the diversity of signaling modulators that function during development, clearly defining the role of Wnt at each milestone of cardiogenesis presents a major challenge. Here, we interrogated the role of the Wnt pathway in specifying endothelial derivatives of embryonic CPCs and demonstrated a differential influence of Wnt signaling in regulating the growth and vascular specification of CPCs during mouse cardiogenesis and cardiac differentiation of hPSCs. By combining recombinase-based fate mapping and cardiac-specific perturbations of Wnt signaling with in vitro modulation of Wnt signaling in hPSC differentiation cultures, we linked inhibition of Wnt signaling with acquisition of vascular fate, and identified a novel mechanism of cardiac neovascularization that is mediated by paracrine modulation of Wnt signaling in CPCs (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Multiphasic function of intersection of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling during cardiovascular lineage diversification. Wnt plays multiple roles during differentiation of pluripotent cells within the cardiovascular lineage. Wnt signaling initially directs pluripotent cells toward cardiac mesoderm, but is later inhibited during specification of cardiac progenitor cells expressing Nkx2.5. Subsequently, inhibition of Wnt signaling within the Nkx2.5+ pool via non-canonical Wnt5a promotes vascular specification.

The cellular origins of the coronary vasculature and its developmental patterning are relatively unexplored areas that have important implications for treatment of cardiovascular disease. Although endocardium has previously been thought to provide negligible contribution to myocardial vessels (Ishii et al., 2009), numerous groups have since demonstrated that endocardium undergoes angiogenic sprouting to generate endothelial networks within the coronary vascular tree (Del Monte and Harvey, 2012; Wu et al., 2012; Zhang and Zhou, 2013). Indeed, endocardial ECs in the fetal human heart have been shown to exhibit tip cell behavior, with endothelial networks in the myocardium sprouting from endocardial progenitors (Rusu et al., 2015). Therefore, increased expression of transcripts related to Notch signaling and tip cell phenotype in hPSC-derived NkxECs (Fig. 3B) might derive from an angiogenic impetus that is native to endocardium. Notch is known to provide a unique regulatory input in endothelial tip cells during neoangiogenesis (Benedito et al., 2009), and precise temporal regulation of Notch signaling between endocardium and myocardium coordinates ventricular patterning with coronary vessel development (D'Amato et al., 2016). Application of hPSC-derived endocardium in cell-based in vitro models of endocardial/myocardial crosstalk might provide a means of dissecting mechanisms of cardiac neovascularization and repair.

Although few studies have examined the effect of Wnt signal modulation on vascular specification of CPCs, pan-EC recombination strategies using Tie2-Cre and Cdh5-Cre mice have examined the effect of EC-specific gain/loss of β-catenin function (Corada et al., 2010). Although these mutations are not specifically targeted to heart vasculature, Corada et al. (2010) attributed the lethal phenotype of β-cateninGOF embryos to increased Notch signal activation, which has been shown to reduce expression of Flk1 (Vegfr2 or Kdr) (Suchting et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2006). Given the essential role of Notch in tip cells during neoangiogenesis (Benedito et al., 2009), increased expression of tip cell genes in NkxECs (Fig. 3B) might reflect a role for Notch during vascular specification of CP/CMs. Indeed, Flk1 is an essential mediator of EC identity and absolutely required for acquisition of EC fate (Shalaby et al., 1997), so Wnt crosstalk with Flk1 via Notch could indirectly influence vascular specification of CP/CMs. Lower levels of FLK1 in CP/CMs cultured with CHIR99021 (Fig. 6E) and increased FLK1 in response to WNT5A or WNT11 (Fig. 6F) are consistent with an influence of Wnt signal activation on FLK1 in hPSC-derived CP/CMs. However, further experiments will be required to precisely define the mechanistic link between Wnt, Notch and FLK1 at the interface of CPC and EC identity.

Multiple studies have investigated the effect of β-catenin gain/loss of function during murine cardiogenesis (Klaus et al., 2007; Kwon et al., 2007). These studies revealed the multiphasic nature of Wnt, with loss of β-catenin later in cardiogenesis resulting in diminished right ventricles (derived from second heart field), whereas left ventricles (derived from first heart field) are of normal size. β-cateninLOF embryos described in the present study (Fig. 5D-F) recapitulated previously reported anatomical aberrations, but also displayed a shift in the NkxEC:nEC ratio toward NkxECs specifically in the right ventricle. Distinct EC subgroups within the embryonic heart are difficult to parse, as they are believed to arise from multiple populations, including pharyngeal mesoderm and progenitors within the first and second heart fields (Harris and Black, 2010; Vincent and Buckingham, 2010). Our measurements of EC ratio during mouse cardiogenesis identified a substantial contribution of both NkxECs and nECs to endocardium; however, NkxECs were relatively enriched in the left ventricle (derived primarily from first heart field). Combined with the fact that conditional ablation of β-catenin significantly increased the proportion of NkxECs only in the left ventricle, these data suggest that Nkx2.5-expressing progenitors make a more substantial contribution to left ventricular endocardium. A shortcoming of this study is the lack of correlative Cre-based strains that enable manipulation of the nEC compartment. However, the finding that Wnt5a gain of function increased the proportion of NkxECs in both ventricles suggests that Wnt inhibition via secreted non-canonical ligands amplifies specification of NkxECs and not nECs from their respective progenitor populations. This could stem from a differential response to Wnt signaling among EC-competent progenitors or could be due to the fact that nECs may originate from progenitors that have undergone vascular specification outside the region of Wnt5a expression.

Previous studies have demonstrated a requirement for Wnt5a and Wnt11 in cardiac development (Bisson et al., 2015; Cohen et al., 2012), and both ligands exert an inhibitory influence on Wnt signaling in cells expressing the receptor Ror2 (van Amerongen et al., 2012). Wnt5a expression has also been linked to β-catenin-mediated Wnt activation in epicardium: knockout of Wt1 results in reduced expression of Wnt5a as well as β-catenin targets (von Gise et al., 2011); and Wnt activation is accompanied by upregulation of Wnt5a in transient fibrotic tissue that ultimately gives rise to regenerated cardiomyocytes following cryoinjury of neonatal heart (Mizutani et al., 2016). In the present study, inhibitory effectors of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling were significantly enriched in CP/CMs (Fig. 2B,C), and exposure to exogenous WNT5A and WNT11 in isolated CP/CMs, or ectopic Wnt5a in embryonic mouse heart, enriched for NkxECs (Fig. 5). Although a vascular phenotype in embryonic hearts of Wnt5a and/or Wnt11 mutant mice has not been addressed, the data above suggest that non-canonical Wnt plays a role in not only morphogenesis and proliferation, but also vascular specification within embryonic heart.

Although there is no precedent for Wnt activation regulating FLK1 expression in CPCs, recent work has expanded the scope of Wnt signaling during cardiogenesis, elucidating its function in balancing the differentiation and proliferation of epicardial progenitor-like cells from hPSCs (Iyer et al., 2016; Witty et al., 2014). These studies demonstrate a transient growth phase following specification of CPCs, during which cells progress through proepicardial intermediates to self-renewing epicardial cells that generate smooth muscle cell (SMC) and fibroblast derivatives. Although differentiation of hPSC-derived epicardium to EC fate is negligible and numerous studies suggest that epicardium in development mostly contributes to cardiomyocytes, SMCs and fibroblasts (Cai et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2008a), fate-mapping experiments have clearly demonstrated that the proepicardial organ derives from Nkx2.5-expressing progenitors (Zhou et al., 2008b) and makes a substantial contribution to the coronary vasculature (Katz et al., 2012). Indeed, a previous study of epicardial-specific null mutation of β-catenin demonstrated a failure of epicardial cells to colonize and expand within the subepicardial space, ultimately resulting in a lack of subepicardial vascularization (Zamora et al., 2007). Given the prominent contribution that epicardium makes to the cellular constitution of the cardiac wound healing response, interrogation of pathways that modulate the differentiation potential of epicardial progenitors might provide a means of improving the recovery of functional cardiac tissue following ischemic injury.

Many groups have linked inhibition of Wnt signaling to improved wound healing following MI. Transgenic mice overexpressing the Wnt inhibitor SFRP1 showed reduced scar formation and improved cardiac function following MI with significantly higher capillary density observed in transgenic hearts (Barandon et al., 2004, 2003). Direct administration of recombinant SFRP2 (He et al., 2010) or SFRP4 (Matsushima et al., 2010) into the heart post-MI reduced fibrosis and improved cardiac function in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in better infarct healing. This benefit is recapitulated in cell-autonomous models of Wnt loss of function: conditional depletion of β-catenin in adult hearts following MI results in mobilization of tissue-resident CPCs, increased 4-week survival and improved left ventricular function (Zelarayan et al., 2008). Pharmacological inhibition of Wnt also provides a benefit during cardiac wound healing: Pyrvinium, an FDA-approved drug that has been shown to exert an inhibitory influence on Wnt, improved cardiac function at 1 month post-MI (Saraswati et al., 2010), and a peptide fragment that acts as a competitive inhibitor of Wnt signal activation (UM206) reduced infarct size and improved cardiac function and survival following MI, with a significant increase in neovascularization of the infarct zone (Laeremans et al., 2011). Finally, two recent studies have employed pharmacological inhibitors of porcupine, a protein required to enable exit of Wnt ligands from the endoplasmic reticulum, to demonstrate a beneficial effect of global Wnt inhibition on cardiac remodeling and function post-MI (Bastakoty et al., 2016; Moon et al., 2017). Although Wnt signaling is likely to play a role in numerous pathological responses to cardiac wound healing, including inflammation, proliferation and remodeling, these results might reflect a capacity for Wnt signal inhibition to enforce pro-angiogenic differentiation among adult CPCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) culture

Experiments were performed using the Mel-1 NKX2.5eGFP/w hPSC line (Elliott et al., 2011), which was provided by David Elliot, Andrew Elefanty and Edouard Stanley. Permission for use of this cell line was granted by the Cornell-Rockefeller-Sloan Kettering Institute ESCRO committee. hESC culture medium consisted of Advanced DMEM/F12 (Gibco) with 20% Knockout Serum Replacement (Invitrogen), L-glutamine (2 mM, Invitrogen), Pen/Strep (Invitrogen), β-mercaptoethanol (550 nM, Gibco), and 4 ng/ml FGF2 (Invitrogen). hESCs were maintained on Matrigel (Corning) using MEF-conditioned hPSC medium (GlobalStem) and handled as previously described (James et al., 2006). All cell lines were confirmed to be mycoplasma free every ten passages.

Lentiviral transduction

Lentiviruses were generated by transfecting 15 µg lentiviral vector, 3 µg pENV/VSV-G, 5 µg pRRE, and 2.5 µg pRSV-REV in HEK 293T cells (passage 8-10; subconfluent, 100 mm dish) by the calcium precipitation method. Supernatants were collected 40 and 64 h after transfection and concentrated by Lenti-X concentrator (Clontech, 31232). Using NKX2.5eGFP/w hPSCs, clonal lines containing the VPrmOrange EC-specific transgene were obtained as previously described (James et al., 2011).

hPSC differentiation

One day before plating hPSCs to begin differentiation, MEF-conditioned medium was replaced with hPSC culture medium without FGF2 and supplemented with 2 ng/ml BMP4. The next day (day 0 of differentiation), hPSCs were plated directly onto gelatin in hPSC culture medium (without FGF2, plus 20 ng/ml BMP4, 40 ng/ml activin A, 2.5 µM CHIR99021) and not disturbed for 48 h. On day 2, cells were stimulated with 40 ng/ml BMP4 and 2 ng/ml FGF2. Differentiation cultures containing VEGFA at 10 ng/ml beginning from day 2 to point of harvest. In isolated CP/CM cultures, VEGFA was not included during bulk hPSC differentiation. CHIR99021, Endo-IWR1 and XAV-939 were used at 2.5 µM unless otherwise indicated. Recombinant cytokines (Wnt5a, Wnt11; R&D Systems) were used at 100 ng/ml.

Lentivirus-based reporter assay

FACS-sorted CP/CMs were plated into individual wells of a 48-well flat-bottom plate in hPSC base medium with 10 ng/ml VEGFA and other recombinant cytokines as indicated. Individual wells were transduced overnight with TCF/Lef lentiviral particles expressing firefly luciferase or the respective positive and negative control lentiviral particles (Cignal Lenti Reporter Kit, SABiosciences) at a multiplicity of infection of 25 according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 18 h, medium was removed and CP/CMs were incubated in designated conditions for 3 days further, changing the medium after 2 days. Four days following isolation, luciferase activity was measured on a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices) using the Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

RNA-seq library construction, sequencing and analysis

Total RNA was prepared from FACS-sorted cells and quality was checked on an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer. 1 µg high-quality total RNA was used as input to convert mRNA into a library of template molecules for subsequent cluster generation and sequencing using the reagents provided in the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit. Following purification of the poly(A)-containing mRNA using poly(T) oligo-attached magnetic beads, the mRNA was fragmented into small pieces using divalent cations under elevated temperature. The cleaved RNA fragments were copied into first-strand cDNA using reverse transcriptase and random primers, followed by second-strand cDNA synthesis using DNA polymerase I and RNase H. These cDNA fragments then went through an end-repair process, the addition of a single ‘A’ base, and then ligation of adapters. The products were purified and enriched by PCR to create the final cDNA library. After quantifying and checking the size and purity of the product, multiplexed DNA libraries were normalized to 10 nM and then two sample libraries were pooled together in equal volumes. 7 pM each pooled DNA library template was amplified on an Illumina cBot instrument, involving immobilization and 3′ extension, bridge amplification, linearization and hybridization, then sequenced on one lane of the Illumina HiSeq2000 sequencer using the pair-end module and generating 2×58 bp reads. The samples HUVEC, CP/CM, NkxEC and nEC were aligned to the human GRCh38 reference assembly (NCBI) using STAR aligner (Dobin et al., 2013) and subsequently genes were counted in htseq (Harada et al., 1999). The raw counts mapping to GRCh38 were subsequently analyzed in R package edgeR and differential expression analysis was performed. After selecting the most variant 910 genes by expression, multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were prepared among the sample groups, and showed clear differentiation between the four tissue types (Fig. 3A).

FACS

Flow cytometry analysis and sorting was performed on a FACSJazz (BD Biosciences). Configuration of the FACSJazz was as follows: 405 nm laser with 450/50 band pass (BP) (DAPI) and 520/35 BP (BV 510) filters; 488 nm laser with 530/40 BP (GFP) and 585/29 BP (PE) filters; and 640 nm laser with 660/20 BP (APC) and 750 LP (APC-Cy7) filters. Antibodies used were specific for human CD31-PE (MEC 13.3, BD Biosciences), human CD43-APC (10G7, Biolegend), mouse CD31-PE (390, eBioscience) and mouse CD45-APC (30-F11, eBioscience); antibodies were used at the concentration recommended by the manufacturer. Data were analyzed using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences). Clonal sorting was via direct deposition of five cells per well of a 96-well plate using the FACSJazz Automated Cell Deposition Unit (ACDU).

Immunofluorescence

Cells were stained as previously described (James et al., 2010). Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in PBST (0.1% Tween 20) and blocked in 5% donkey serum for 45 min. Samples were incubated for 2 h in blocking solution containing primary antibodies that were directly conjugated to Alexa 488, 568 or 647. Antibodies used were specific for CD31 (MEC 13.3, BD Biosciences), Nkx2.5 (8792, Cell Signaling), cardiac troponin (MAB6887, R&D Systems) and smooth muscle actin (MAB1420, R&D Systems). Imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope.

Confocal microscopy and live imaging

Microscopy was performed using a 710 META confocal microscope (Zeiss) with the following laser lines: 405, 458, 488, 514, 561 and 633 nm. Filter settings for fluorescent proteins and fluorophores were: 450/20 BP for DAPI; 530/20 BP for GFP and Alexa 488; 560/20 BP for mOrange; 630/30 BP for tdTomato; and 670/20 BP for Alexa 647. For live imaging, NKX2.5eGFP/VPrmOrange hPSCs were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a stage-mounted incubation chamber (Tokai Hit), with image capture at variable intervals. Colocalization was performed using Zen colocalization software (Zeiss) and the pixel area of single- and double-positive cells quantified.

Mouse strains

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Weill Cornell Medical College. Breeding was performed using animals between 12 weeks and 1 year of age. The mouse strains that were intercrossed to generate the animals in this study were: Flk1-GFP (Jackson Labs, 017006), RosatdTom (Jackson Labs, 007905), TCF:LEFH2B-GFP (Jackson Labs, 013752), Cdh5Cre (Jackson Labs, 017968), β-cateninflox/flox (Jackson Labs, 004152), Igs1tm6(CAG-Bgeo,-Wnt5a)Nat (Wnt5aGOF; Jackson Labs, 018141), Wnt5aflox/flox mice (Jackson Labs, 026626), Nkx2.5Cre [provided by Richard Harvey (Stanley et al., 2002)] and β-cateninflEx3/flEx3 [provided by Makoto Taketo (Harada et al., 1999)]. For quantification of NkxEC versus nEC number, 10 µm sections were collected for the entire span of the heart and colocalization masking distinguished EC subtypes.

Statistical analysis

Experiments were repeated at least three times, with the technician performing quantitative analysis blinded to the experimental conditions. We included all tested animals for quantification to analyze the statistical difference. A representative image from experimental groups is presented in corresponding figures. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. Differences between groups containing more than one condition were assessed by one-way ANOVA, and to quantify statistical difference of each condition to control an unpaired two-tailed t-test was performed.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information
develop-145-159905-s1.pdf (441.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary information
DEV159905supp.pdf (441.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank David Elliot, Andrew Elefanty and Eduoard Stanley for providing the NKX2.5eGFP/w hPSC line. We also thank the staff of the Tri-Institutional Stem Cell Core Facility at Weill Cornell Medicine, particularly Raphael Lis, who provided exceptional support during the planning and execution of experiments and offered valued insights during analysis of data.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: D.J.; Methodology: D.E.R., L.P., L.M., K.C., D.J.; Formal analysis: D.R., D.J.; Investigation: D.E.R., D.J.; Resources: M.M.T., R.P.H.; Data curation: D.R.; Writing - original draft: D.J.; Writing - review & editing: D.J.; Supervision: D.J.; Project administration: D.J.; Funding acquisition: Z.R., D.J.

Funding

D.E.R. was supported by funds from the KY Cha Award provided by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. R.P.H. was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (573705, 573732, 1074386) and the Australian Research Council Special Initiative in Stem Cell Science (Stem Cells Australia). Deposited in PMC for immediate release.

Data availability

RNA-seq data are available at Gene Expression Omnibus under accession numbers GSE108465 (hPSC) and GSE57662 (HUVEC).

Supplementary information

Supplementary information available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.159905.supplemental

References

  1. Bao X., Lian X., Dunn K. K., Shi M., Han T., Qian T., Bhute V. J., Canfield S. G. and Palecek S. P. (2015). Chemically-defined albumin-free differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to endothelial progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. 15, 122-129. 10.1016/j.scr.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barandon L., Couffinhal T., Ezan J., Dufourcq P., Costet P., Alzieu P., Leroux L., Moreau C., Dare D. and Duplaa C. (2003). Reduction of infarct size and prevention of cardiac rupture in transgenic mice overexpressing FrzA. Circulation 108, 2282-2289. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093186.22847.4C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barandon L., Couffinhal T., Dufourcq P., Ezan J., Costet P., Daret D., Deville C. and Duplàa C. (2004). Frizzled A, a novel angiogenic factor: promises for cardiac repair. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 25, 76-83. 10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00506-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bastakoty D., Saraswati S., Joshi P., Atkinson J., Feoktistov I., Liu J., Harris J. L. and Young P. P. (2016). Temporary, systemic inhibition of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway promotes regenerative cardiac repair following myocardial infarct. Cell Stem Cells Regen. Med. 2, doi: 10.16966/2472-6990.111 10.16966/2472-6990.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benedito R., Roca C., Sörensen I., Adams S., Gossler A., Fruttiger M. and Adams R. H. (2009). The notch ligands Dll4 and Jagged1 have opposing effects on angiogenesis. Cell 137, 1124-1135. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bisson J. A., Mills B., Paul Helt J.-C., Zwaka T. P. and Cohen E. D. (2015). Wnt5a and Wnt11 inhibit the canonical Wnt pathway and promote cardiac progenitor development via the Caspase-dependent degradation of AKT. Dev. Biol. 398, 80-96. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolli R., Chugh A. R., D'Amario D., Loughran J. H., Stoddard M. F., Ikram S., Beache G. M., Wagner S. G., Leri A., Hosoda T. et al. (2011). Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet 378, 1847-1857. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61590-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  8. Brault V., Moore R., Kutsch S., Ishibashi M., Rowitch D. H., McMahon A. P., Sommer L., Boussadia O. and Kemler R. (2001). Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development 128, 1253-1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai C.-L., Martin J. C., Sun Y., Cui L., Wang L., Ouyang K., Yang L., Bu L., Liang X., Zhang X. et al. (2008). A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature 454, 104-108. 10.1038/nature06969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen M. J., Yokomizo T., Zeigler B. M., Dzierzak E. and Speck N. A. (2009). Runx1 is required for the endothelial to haematopoietic cell transition but not thereafter. Nature 457, 887-891. 10.1038/nature07619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chong J. J. H., Yang X., Don C. W., Minami E., Liu Y.-W., Weyers J. J., Mahoney W. M., Van Biber B., Cook S. M., Palpant N. J. et al. (2014). Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature 510, 273-277. 10.1038/nature13233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chugh A. R., Beache G. M., Loughran J. H., Mewton N., Elmore J. B., Kajstura J., Pappas P., Tatooles A., Stoddard M. F., Lima J. A. C. et al. (2012). Administration of cardiac stem cells in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: the SCIPIO trial: surgical aspects and interim analysis of myocardial function and viability by magnetic resonance. Circulation 126, S54-S64. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cleutjens J. P., Blankesteijn W. M., Daemen M. J. and Smits J. F. (1999). The infarcted myocardium: simply dead tissue, or a lively target for therapeutic interventions. Cardiovasc. Res. 44, 232-241. 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00212-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen E. D., Miller M. F., Wang Z., Moon R. T. and Morrisey E. E. (2012). Wnt5a and Wnt11 are essential for second heart field progenitor development. Development 139, 1931-1940. 10.1242/dev.069377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Corada M., Nyqvist D., Orsenigo F., Caprini A., Giampietro C., Taketo M. M., Iruela-Arispe M. L., Adams R. H. and Dejana E. (2010). The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway modulates vascular remodeling and specification by upregulating Dll4/Notch signaling. Dev. Cell 18, 938-949. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. D'Amato G., Luxán G., del Monte-Nieto G., Martínez-Poveda B., Torroja C., Walter W., Bochter M. S., Benedito R., Cole S., Martinez F. et al. (2016). Sequential Notch activation regulates ventricular chamber development. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 7-20. 10.1038/ncb3280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Del Monte G. and Harvey R. P. (2012). An endothelial contribution to coronary vessels. Cell 151, 932-934. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. del Toro R., Prahst C., Mathivet T., Siegfried G., Kaminker J. S., Larrivee B., Breant C., Duarte A., Takakura N., Fukamizu A. et al. (2010). Identification and functional analysis of endothelial tip cell-enriched genes. Blood 116, 4025-4033. 10.1182/blood-2010-02-270819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobin A., Davis C. A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson T. and Gingeras T. R. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15-21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Elliott D. A., Braam S. R., Koutsis K., Ng E. S., Jenny R., Lagerqvist E. L., Biben C., Hatzistavrou T., Hirst C. E., Yu Q. C. et al. (2011). NKX2-5(eGFP/w) hESCs for isolation of human cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods 8, 1037-1040. 10.1038/nmeth.1740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ema M., Takahashi S. and Rossant J. (2006). Deletion of the selection cassette, but not cis-acting elements, in targeted Flk1-lacZ allele reveals Flk1 expression in multipotent mesodermal progenitors. Blood 107, 111-117. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferrer-Vaquer A., Piliszek A., Tian G., Aho R. J., Dufort D. and Hadjantonakis A.-K. (2010). A sensitive and bright single-cell resolution live imaging reporter of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 10, 121 10.1186/1471-213X-10-121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gessert S. and Kuhl M. (2010). The multiple phases and faces of wnt signaling during cardiac differentiation and development. Circ. Res. 107, 186-199. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harada N., Tamai Y., Ishikawa T., Sauer B., Takaku K., Oshima M. and Taketo M. M. (1999). Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J. 18, 5931-5942. 10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harris I. S. and Black B. L. (2010). Development of the endocardium. Pediatr. Cardiol. 31, 391-399. 10.1007/s00246-010-9642-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. He W., Zhang L., Ni A., Zhang Z., Mirotsou M., Mao L., Pratt R. E. and Dzau V. J. (2010). Exogenously administered secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) reduces fibrosis and improves cardiac function in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21110-21115. 10.1073/pnas.1004708107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ishii Y., Langberg J., Rosborough K. and Mikawa T. (2009). Endothelial cell lineages of the heart. Cell Tissue Res. 335, 67-73. 10.1007/s00441-008-0663-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Iyer D., Gambardella L., Bernard W. G., Serrano F., Mascetti V. L., Pedersen R. A., Sinha S. and Talasila A. (2016). Robust derivation of epicardium and its differentiated smooth muscle cell progeny from human pluripotent stem cells. Development 143, 904 10.1242/dev.136143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. James D., Noggle S. A., Swigut T. and Brivanlou A. H. (2006). Contribution of human embryonic stem cells to mouse blastocysts. Dev. Biol. 295, 90-102. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. James D., Nam H.-S., Seandel M., Nolan D., Janovitz T., Tomishima M., Studer L., Lee G., Lyden D., Benezra R. et al. (2010). Expansion and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells by TGFbeta inhibition is Id1 dependent. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 161-166. 10.1038/nbt.1605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. James D., Zhan Q., Kloss C., Zaninovic N., Rosenwaks Z. and Rafii S. (2011). Lentiviral transduction and clonal selection of hESCs with endothelial-specific transgenic reporters. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. Chapter 1, Unit1F.12 10.1002/9780470151808.sc01f12s17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Katz T. C., Singh M. K., Degenhardt K., Rivera-Feliciano J., Johnson R. L., Epstein J. A. and Tabin C. J. (2012). Distinct compartments of the proepicardial organ give rise to coronary vascular endothelial cells. Dev. Cell 22, 639-650. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.01.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Klaus A., Saga Y., Taketo M. M., Tzahor E. and Birchmeier W. (2007). Distinct roles of Wnt/beta-catenin and Bmp signaling during early cardiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18531-18536. 10.1073/pnas.0703113104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kwon C., Arnold J., Hsiao E. C., Taketo M. M., Conklin B. R. and Srivastava D. (2007). Canonical Wnt signaling is a positive regulator of mammalian cardiac progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10894-10899. 10.1073/pnas.0704044104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Laeremans H., Hackeng T. M., van Zandvoort M. A. M., Thijssen V. L. J. L., Janssen B. J. A., Ottenheijm H. C. J., Smits J. F. M. and Blankesteijn W. M. (2011). Blocking of frizzled signaling with a homologous peptide fragment of wnt3a/wnt5a reduces infarct expansion and prevents the development of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Circulation 124, 1626-1635. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Laflamme M. A., Chen K. Y., Naumova A. V., Muskheli V., Fugate J. A., Dupras S. K., Reinecke H., Xu C., Hassanipour M., Police S. et al. (2007). Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1015-1024. 10.1038/nbt1327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lian X., Hsiao C., Wilson G., Zhu K., Hazeltine L. B., Azarin S. M., Raval K. K., Zhang J., Kamp T. J. and Palecek S. P. (2012). Robust cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells via temporal modulation of canonical Wnt signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1848-E1857. 10.1073/pnas.1200250109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lian X., Bao X., Al-Ahmad A., Liu J., Wu Y., Dong W., Dunn K. K., Shusta E. V. and Palecek S. P. (2014). Efficient differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to endothelial progenitors via small-molecule activation of WNT signaling. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 804-816. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Madisen L., Zwingman T. A., Sunkin S. M., Oh S. W., Zariwala H. A., Gu H., Ng L. L., Palmiter R. D., Hawrylycz M. J., Jones A. R. et al. (2010). A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133-140. 10.1038/nn.2467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Marvin M. J., Di Rocco G., Gardiner A., Bush S. M. and Lassar A. B. (2001). Inhibition of Wnt activity induces heart formation from posterior mesoderm. Genes Dev. 15, 316-327. 10.1101/gad.855501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Matsushima K., Suyama T., Takenaka C., Nishishita N., Ikeda K., Ikada Y., Sawa Y., Jakt L. M., Mori H. and Kawamata S. (2010). Secreted frizzled related protein 4 reduces fibrosis scar size and ameliorates cardiac function after ischemic injury. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 3329-3341. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mizutani M., Wu J. C. and Nusse R. (2016). Fibrosis of the neonatal mouse heart after cryoinjury is accompanied by Wnt signaling activation and epicardial-to-mesenchymal transition. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5, e002457 10.1161/JAHA.115.002457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Moon J., Zhou H., Zhang L.-S., Tan W., Liu Y., Zhang S., Morlock L. K., Bao X., Palecek S. P., Feng J. Q. et al. (2017). Blockade to pathological remodeling of infarcted heart tissue using a porcupine antagonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1649-1654. 10.1073/pnas.1621346114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Naito A. T., Shiojima I., Akazawa H., Hidaka K., Morisaki T., Kikuchi A. and Komuro I. (2006). Developmental stage-specific biphasic roles of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in cardiomyogenesis and hematopoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19812-19817. 10.1073/pnas.0605768103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Paige S. L., Osugi T., Afanasiev O. K., Pabon L., Reinecke H. and Murry C. E. (2010). Endogenous Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for cardiac differentiation in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 5, e11134 10.1371/journal.pone.0011134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Qyang Y., Martin-Puig S., Chiravuri M., Chen S., Xu H., Bu L., Jiang X., Lin L., Granger A., Moretti A. et al. (2007). The renewal and differentiation of Isl1+ cardiovascular progenitors are controlled by a Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Cell Stem Cell 1, 165-179. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Roger V. L., Go A. S., Lloyd-Jones D. M., Benjamin E. J., Berry J. D., Borden W. B., Bravata D. M., Dai S., Ford E. S., Fox C. S. et al. (2012). Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 125, e2-e220. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318245fac5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rusu M. C., Poalelungi C. V., Vrapciu A. D., Nicolescu M. I., Hostiuc S., Mogoanta L. and Taranu T. (2015). Endocardial tip cells in the human embryo - facts and hypotheses. PLoS ONE 10, e0115853 10.1371/journal.pone.0115853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ryu Y. K., Collins S. E., Ho H.-Y. H., Zhao H. and Kuruvilla R. (2013). An autocrine Wnt5a-Ror signaling loop mediates sympathetic target innervation. Dev. Biol. 377, 79-89. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Saraswati S., Alfaro M. P., Thorne C. A., Atkinson J., Lee E. and Young P. P. (2010). Pyrvinium, a potent small molecule Wnt inhibitor, promotes wound repair and post-MI cardiac remodeling. PLoS ONE 5, e15521 10.1371/journal.pone.0015521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schneider V. A. and Mercola M. (2001). Wnt antagonism initiates cardiogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 15, 304-315. 10.1101/gad.855601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shalaby F., Ho J., Stanford W. L., Fischer K.-D., Schuh A. C., Schwartz L., Bernstein A. and Rossant J. (1997). A requirement for Flk1 in primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Cell 89, 981-990. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80283-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shiba Y., Fernandes S., Zhu W.-Z., Filice D., Muskheli V., Kim J., Palpant N. J., Gantz J., Moyes K. W., Reinecke H. et al. (2012). Human ES-cell-derived cardiomyocytes electrically couple and suppress arrhythmias in injured hearts. Nature 489, 322-325. 10.1038/nature11317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stanley E. G., Biben C., Elefanty A., Barnett L., Koentgen F., Robb L. and Harvey R. P. (2002). Efficient Cre-mediated deletion in cardiac progenitor cells conferred by a 3'UTR-ires-Cre allele of the homeobox gene Nkx2-5. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46, 431-439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Suchting S., Freitas C., le Noble F., Benedito R., Breant C., Duarte A. and Eichmann A. (2007). The Notch ligand Delta-like 4 negatively regulates endothelial tip cell formation and vessel branching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3225-3230. 10.1073/pnas.0611177104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Uygur A. and Lee R. T. (2016). Mechanisms of cardiac regeneration. Dev. Cell 36, 362-374. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. van Amerongen R., Fuerer C., Mizutani M. and Nusse R. (2012). Wnt5a can both activate and repress Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during mouse embryonic development. Dev. Biol. 369, 101-114. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.06.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vincent S. D. and Buckingham M. E. (2010). How to make a heart: the origin and regulation of cardiac progenitor cells. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 90, 1-41. 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)90001-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. von Gise A., Zhou B., Honor L. B., Ma Q., Petryk A. and Pu W. T. (2011). WT1 regulates epicardial epithelial to mesenchymal transition through beta-catenin and retinoic acid signaling pathways. Dev. Biol. 356, 421-431. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.05.668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Willems E., Spiering S., Davidovics H., Lanier M., Xia Z., Dawson M., Cashman J. and Mercola M. (2011). Small-molecule inhibitors of the Wnt pathway potently promote cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cell-derived mesoderm. Circ. Res. 109, 360-364. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.249540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Williams C. K., Li J. L., Murga M., Harris A. L. and Tosato G. (2006). Up-regulation of the Notch ligand Delta-like 4 inhibits VEGF-induced endothelial cell function. Blood 107, 931-939. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Witty A. D., Mihic A., Tam R. Y., Fisher S. A., Mikryukov A., Shoichet M. S., Li R.-K., Kattman S. J. and Keller G. (2014). Generation of the epicardial lineage from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1026-1035. 10.1038/nbt.3002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wu B., Zhang Z., Lui W., Chen X., Wang Y., Chamberlain A. A., Moreno-Rodriguez R. A., Markwald R. R., O'Rourke B. P., Sharp D. J. et al. (2012). Endocardial cells form the coronary arteries by angiogenesis through myocardial-endocardial VEGF signaling. Cell 151, 1083-1096. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zamora M., Manner J. and Ruiz-Lozano P. (2007). Epicardium-derived progenitor cells require beta-catenin for coronary artery formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18109-18114. 10.1073/pnas.0702415104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zangi L., Lui K. O., von Gise A., Ma Q., Ebina W., Ptaszek L. M., Später D., Xu H., Tabebordbar M., Gorbatov R. et al. (2013). Modified mRNA directs the fate of heart progenitor cells and induces vascular regeneration after myocardial infarction. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 898-907. 10.1038/nbt.2682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zelarayan L. C., Noack C., Sekkali B., Kmecova J., Gehrke C., Renger A., Zafiriou M.-P., van der Nagel R., Dietz R., de Windt L. J. et al. (2008). Beta-Catenin downregulation attenuates ischemic cardiac remodeling through enhanced resident precursor cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19762-19767. 10.1073/pnas.0808393105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang Z. and Zhou B. (2013). Accelerated coronary angiogenesis by vegfr1-knockout endocardial cells. PLoS ONE 8, e70570 10.1371/journal.pone.0070570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhou B., Ma Q., Rajagopal S., Wu S. M., Domian I., Rivera-Feliciano J., Jiang D., von Gise A., Ikeda S., Chien K. R. et al. (2008a). Epicardial progenitors contribute to the cardiomyocyte lineage in the developing heart. Nature 454, 109-113. 10.1038/nature07060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhou B., von Gise A., Ma Q., Rivera-Feliciano J. and Pu W. T. (2008b). Nkx2-5- and Isl1-expressing cardiac progenitors contribute to proepicardium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375, 450-453. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
develop-145-159905-s1.pdf (441.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary information
DEV159905supp.pdf (441.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Development (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES