Abstract
Progressive failure of insulin-producing β-cells is the central event leading to diabetes, but the signaling networks controlling β-cell fate remain poorly understood. Here we show that SRp55, a splicing factor regulated by the diabetes susceptibility gene GLIS3, has a major role in maintaining the function and survival of human β-cells. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that SRp55 regulates the splicing of genes involved in cell survival and death, insulin secretion, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling. In particular, SRp55-mediated splicing changes modulate the function of the proapoptotic proteins BIM and BAX, JNK signaling, and endoplasmic reticulum stress, explaining why SRp55 depletion triggers β-cell apoptosis. Furthermore, SRp55 depletion inhibits β-cell mitochondrial function, explaining the observed decrease in insulin release. These data unveil a novel layer of regulation of human β-cell function and survival, namely alternative splicing modulated by key splicing regulators such as SRp55, that may cross talk with candidate genes for diabetes.
Introduction
Diabetes is caused by loss and/or functional impairment of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) differ in their genetic background, associated environmental factors, and clinical history, but both forms of diabetes show loss of β-cell mass, which is near total in long-term T1D and in the range of 20–50% in T2D (1–3). The mechanisms leading to this decrease in functional β-cell mass remain elusive, which may explain why intervention trials aiming to halt or revert β-cell loss in diabetes have consistently failed.
Genetic variations in the transcription factor GLIS3 are associated with susceptibility to both T1D and T2D (4,5). GLIS3 mutations also cause a neonatal diabetes syndrome characterized by neonatal diabetes, congenital hypothyroidism, and polycystic kidney (6). Functional studies have shown that GLIS3 regulates β-cell differentiation and insulin transcription (7,8). We showed that GLIS3 is also required for adult β-cell survival, increasing basal apoptosis when depleted in rodent and human β-cells and sensitizing these cells to cytokine- and palmitate-induced apoptosis (9). Increased β-cell apoptosis in Glis3-depleted β-cells in rats is associated with inhibition of the splicing factor SRp55 (also known as Srsf6), leading to a splicing shift in the proapoptotic protein Bim that favors the expression of the most prodeath splice variant Bim S (9).
Alternative splicing (AS) is a key posttranscriptional mechanism in which different combinations of splice sites in the precursor mRNA are selected to generate structurally and functionally distinct mRNA and protein variants. Functionally related transcript populations are regulated by master splicing factors in coordinated “splicing networks” that modulate cell-, tissue-, or developmental-specific functions (10,11). Little is known of the role of AS in diabetes, but recent findings by our group indicate that neuron-enriched splicing factors play important roles in β-cell function and survival (12,13) and that inflammatory and metabolic stresses induce different “AS signatures” in human β-cells (14,15).
The splicing factor SRp55 has been implicated in wound healing and oncogenesis, acting as an oncoprotein that promotes cell proliferation, cell survival, and hyperplasia in cancer (16,17). In this study, we analyzed the global role of SRp55 in β-cell function and survival using human pancreatic islets and the human insulin-producing EndoC-βH1 cell line. We found that SRp55 deficiency leads to increased β-cell apoptosis, impaired mitochondrial respiration, and defective insulin secretion. These findings indicate that SRp55 is a key downstream mediator of GLIS3 function, suggesting that splicing networks regulated by the cross talk between master splicing factors and candidate genes may contribute to β-cell dysfunction and death in diabetes.
Research Design and Methods
Culture of Human Islets and EndoC-βH1 Cells
Human islets from donors without diabetes were isolated in Pisa, Italy, using collagenase digestion and density gradient purification. Islets were cultured at 6.1 mmol/L glucose as described previously (14). Donor characteristics are described in Supplementary Table 1. Human insulin-producing EndoC-βH1 cells were provided by Dr. R. Sharfmann (Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France); they were grown on plates coated with Matrigel and fibronectin (100 and 2 μg/mL, respectively) and cultured in DMEM as previously described (18). In some experiments EndoC-βH1 cells were exposed to the human cytokines interleukin-1β (50 units/mL; R&D Systems, Abingdon, U.K.) and interferon-γ (1,000 units/mL; Peprotech, London, U.K.) for 48 h, as described previously (14).
Gene/Splice Variant Silencing and Overexpression
The small interfering RNAs (siRNA) targeting the human genes/splice variants used in this study are described in Supplementary Table 2; Allstars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) was used as a negative control (siCTL). Transient transfection was performed using 30 nmol/L siRNA and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). A pcDNA FLAG plasmid containing the human cDNA sequence of SRSF6 (SRp55), provided by Professor Hirokazu Hara (Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan), was used to exogenously express SRp55 in EndoC-βH1 cells.
Assessment of Cell Viability
Cell viability was determined using fluorescence microscopy after incubation with the DNA-binding dyes Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide, as described previously (19). In some experiments apoptosis was further confirmed by immunostaining for cleaved caspase-3.
RNA Sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from five independent preparations of EndoC-βH1 cells exposed to control (siCTL) or SRp55 (siSR#2) siRNA using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands). RNA sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSEq 2000 Sequencing System as previously described (12,20). The raw data generated were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus under submission number GSE98485.
RNA Sequencing Analysis
RNA sequencing reads were mapped to the human reference genome GRCh37/hg19 using TopHat 2 (14) and the Gencode annotation data set. Transcript abundance and differential expression were calculated using Flux Capacitor (21). All genes and transcripts have been assigned a relative expression level as measured in reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM). A gene/isoform was considered to be expressed if it had a RPKM ≥0.5. Up- and downregulated genes were identified by computing the Fisher exact test and corrected by the Benjamini-Hochberg method, as previously described (14). A minimum of 17% change (log twofold change of ±0.23) in the expression level between SRp55 knockdown (KD) and control was considered to be “modified expression.”
AS events were analyzed using rMATS (22), which computes percentage splicing index (PSI) and the false discovery rate (FDR) for five different splicing events: skipped exons, mutually exclusive exons, retained introns, and 5′ and 3′ alternative splice sites. To identify significant changes, we used the cutoffs of 5% on ΔPSI and of 0.01% on FDR. Motif enrichment was analyzed in the vicinity of alternatively spliced exons using rMAPS (23) by comparing the spatial occurrence of two SRp55 motifs (17,24) between cassette exons whose inclusion is affected by SRp55 KD and nonmodified exons showing an FDR ≥50%.
Functional annotation and pathway enrichment of genes presenting splicing and/or gene expression alterations were analyzed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis platforms (25).
Validation of Splicing Changes by RT-PCR
Selected alternative splicing changes identified by RNA sequencing was validated by RT-PCR using exonic primers (Supplementary Table 3) encompassing the predicted splicing event. The primers were designed against flanking constitutive exons, allowing different splice variants to be distinguished based on fragment size. cDNA was amplified using MangoTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline), and PCR products were separated using the LabChip electrophoretic Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system and the DNA 1000 LabChip kit (Agilent Technologies, Wokingham, U.K.). The molarity of each PCR band corresponding to a specific splice variant was quantified using the 2100 Expert Software (Agilent Technologies, Diegem, Belgium), and used to calculate the ratio between inclusion and exclusion of the alternative event.
mRNA Extraction and Quantitative (Real-time) PCR
Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated using the Dynabeads mRNA DIRECT Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse transcribed as described previously (19). Quantitative (real-time) PCR was performed using SYBR and concentrations were calculated as copies per microliter using a standard curve (26). Gene expression was corrected for the reference gene β-actin. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Western Blotting and Immunofluorescence
For Western blotting, cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed in Laemmli buffer. Total proteins were resolved by 8–14% SDS-PAGE, transfected to a nitrocellulose membrane, and immunoblotted using the specific primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 4. Densitometric values were corrected with the housekeeping protein α-tubulin as the loading control, after background subtraction. Double immunostaining was performed as previously described (9).
Insulin Secretion
EndoC-βH1 cells were preincubated with culture medium containing 2.8 mmol/L glucose for 18 h. Cells were incubated in Krebs-Ringer buffer for 1 h and sequentially stimulated with 1 mmol/L glucose, 20 mmol/L glucose, or 20 mmol/L glucose and 10 μmol/L forskolin for 40 min, as described elsewhere (27). Insulin release and insulin content were measured in cell-free supernatants and acid/ethanol-extracted cell lysates, respectively, using a human insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Results were normalized by total protein content.
Mitochondrial Respiration
Oxygen consumption rates of EndoC-βH1 cells were measured using the XFp Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA) as previously described (27). After transfection, cells were preincubated in assay medium containing 1 mmol/L glucose at 37°C in air for 1 h. After that, respiration was measured following sequential injections of 20 mmol/L glucose, 5 μmol/L oligomycin, 4 μmol/L carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and 1 μmol/L rotenone plus 1 μmol/L antimycin A. All data were normalized with total DNA content.
Statistical Analysis
Data are shown as mean ± SD. Significant differences between experimental conditions were assessed by a paired Student t test or by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction, as indicated. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
SRp55 Regulates Human β-Cell Survival
Fluorescence microscopy indicated that SRp55 is highly expressed in pancreatic β-cells (Fig. 1A). SRp55 mRNA expression is higher in human pancreatic islets and human insulin-producing EndoC-βH1 cells than in eight other human tissues (Fig. 1B). To study the functional impact of SRp55 depletion on human β-cell survival, we silenced SRp55 using two specific siRNAs in human islets and EndoC-βH1 cells, reaching ≥50% inhibition at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 1C, E, and F). SRp55 silencing significantly increased β-cell death in both dispersed human islets and in EndoC-βH1 cells (Fig. 1D and G). The observed increase in cleaved caspase-3 expression in SRp55-depleted cells confirms that β-cell loss is mediated by apoptosis (Fig. 1H and I). Next, we analyzed whether SRp55 expression is affected by proinflammatory cytokines. Exposure of EndoC-βH1 cells to interleukin-1β and interferon-γ significantly decreased SRp55 protein expression (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Overexpression of SRp55 in EndoC-βH1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B) protected these cells against cytokine-induced apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 1B), suggesting that decreased SRp55 expression may contribute to β-cell death during islet inflammation.
Identification of SRp55-Regulated Splicing Events by RNA Sequencing
SRp55-regulated splicing events were detected by RNA sequencing of five independent EndoC-βH1 preparations under control conditions or after SRp55 KD, obtaining average coverage of 166 million reads. A total of 8,769 AS events were detected as modified after SRp55 KD (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table 5). The majority of modified AS events correspond to cassette exons (59%), followed by mutually exclusive exons (22%), alternative 5′ splice site (9%), alternative 3′ splice site (7%), and intron retention (3%) (Fig. 2B).
Modified AS events affected 4,055 different genes (Supplementary Table 5). Functional enrichment analysis indicated that genes showing AS changes after SRp55 KD depletion are involved in diverse molecular and cellular functions, including cell cycle, DNA repair and replication, cell death and survival, and cellular function and maintenance (Fig. 2C). Enriched pathways included several pathways involved in pancreatic β-cell function, dysfunction, and death (Fig. 2D), including genes related to T2D and insulin secretion, regulation of apoptosis, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling (Fig. 2D).
SRp55 KD had a less marked impact on gene transcription when compared with RNA splicing (Supplementary Fig. 2A and B). Nevertheless, SRp55 KD modified the expression of 2,981 genes, inducing predominantly gene upregulation (Supplementary Fig. 2C and Supplementary Table 6). Of note, 28% of differentially expressed genes also presented changes on AS (Supplementary Fig. 2D). Upregulated genes were enriched in pathways involved in the cell cycle, DNA repair and replication, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, among others (Supplementary Table 6).
SRp55 Binding Motif Analysis
To study whether alternatively spliced genes are directly regulated by SRp55 and to identify spatial patterns of SRp55 binding, we performed an enrichment analysis of the SRp55 binding motifs. We compared the occurrence of SRp55 motifs between modified cassette exons and exons unaffected by SRp55 silencing. We analyzed the enrichment of two SRp55 motifs: a 6-mer motif identified by SELEX (24), and a 9-mer motif identified by de novo discovery in modified exons after SRp55 overexpression in mouse skin (17) (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Significant enrichment for both motifs in exonic regions was found in downregulated exons (Supplementary Fig. 3C and D). These results support the notion that SRp55, like most SR proteins (28), acts as a splicing activator, promoting exon inclusion when bound to exonic splicing enhancers. In line with this, the majority of modified cassette exons (73%) displayed exon skipping after SRp55 depletion (Supplementary Fig. 2B), suggesting that a large proportion of modified splicing events are directly regulated by SRp55. Motif enrichment also indicated that upregulated events were not directly regulated by SRp55 and probably result from the impact of SRp55 on other splicing regulators, as we previously observed after Nova1 KD (12).
Validation of Splicing Events
We next used independent EndoC-βH1 samples, different from the ones used for RNA sequencing, to confirm SRp55-regulated events. Representative genes of pathways regulating β-cell function and survival were selected for further validation. We used RT-PCR followed by automated electrophoresis analysis based on primers that amplify isoforms presenting both inclusion and skipping of alternative fragments. We were able to validate 12 of 12 AS events tested (Fig. 3), indicating good reliability of the data generated by RNA sequencing.
SRp55 Silencing Impairs Insulin Release and Leads to Mitochondrial Dysfunction
SRp55-depleted cells showed impaired insulin secretion at 20 mmol/L glucose and in the presence of glucose plus forskolin, but their insulin content did not change (Fig. 4A and B). Insulin release is regulated by ATP generation, and we next analyzed mitochondrial respiration by assessing the oxygen consumption rate using a Seahorse metabolic analyzer. SRp55-depleted EndoC-βH1 cells showed decreased mitochondrial respiration when compared with control cells, exhibiting lower basal respiration, impaired ATP production (response to oligomycin), and decreased maximal respiration (response to FCCP after oligomycin) (Fig. 4C–G), suggesting that SRp55 silencing–induced mitochondrial dysfunction explains the observed defective glucose-induced insulin release.
Interestingly, RNA sequencing analysis indicated that several transcription factors that regulate the β-cell phenotype and affect insulin secretion were modified after SRp55 KD (Fig. 4H). This includes upregulation of FOXO1 and NEUROD1, genes expressed in poorly differentiated endocrine cells (29), and downregulation of PDX-1 and NKX6.1, key transcription factors for the maintenance of a differentiated β-cell phenotype (30,31).
SRp55 Contributes to β-Cell Apoptosis via Regulation of the Expression of Proapoptotic Splice Variants of BCL-2 Proteins
BCL-2 proteins are a family of apoptotic regulators that play a central role in β-cell survival (32). RNA sequencing analysis indicated that SRp55 regulates splicing of the BCL-2 proteins BIM (BCL2L11), BAX, and BOK, and of related apoptotic proteins DIABLO and BCLAF1 (Figs. 2 and 3). We previously showed that SRp55 KD in rat β-cells increases the expression of the most proapoptotic isoform Bim S (contributing to β-cell apoptosis) (9). Here we confirmed, at both the mRNA and protein levels, that SRp55 also regulates BIM splicing in human β-cells, increasing the proportion of BIM S over BIM L after SRp55 depletion (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 4A and B). An overall increase of BIM isoforms also occurred after SRp55 silencing (Supplementary Fig. 4A and C). To assess the functional role of BIM in SRp55 KD–induced apoptosis, we performed a double KD of SRp55 and BIM (Supplementary Fig. 4D–F). BIM inhibition decreased EndoC-βH1 apoptosis to basal levels (Supplementary Fig. 4F), indicating that BIM plays a central role in regulating cell death in SRp55-depleted cells and suggesting that SRp55 depletion triggers the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis.
SRp55 depletion also affected splicing of the apoptotic effector protein BAX, leading to increased intron 5 retention (Figs. 3A and 5A). Unspliced intron 5 leads to the production of BAX β, a constitutively active isoform that may trigger cell death independent of upstream signaling (33) (Fig. 5B). To test whether alteration of BAX splicing by SRp55 KD contributes to the observed increase in apoptosis, we designed a specific BAX β siRNA and performed single and double KD experiments in combination with SRp55 siRNA (Figs. 5C–F). The upregulation of BAX β after SRp55 KD (Fig. 5E) correlated with increased BAX translocation to the mitochondria (Fig. 5C) and increased apoptosis (Fig. 5F). Prevention of a BAX β increase by a specific siRNA in SRp55-depleted cells (Fig. 5E) reduced BAX translocation to the mitochondria (Fig. 5C) and protected EndoC-βH1 cells (Fig. 5F) and human islets (Fig. 5G) against apoptosis, indicating a contributory role for BAX β in the observed phenotype.
SRp55 Depletion Affects the JNK Signaling Pathway, Leading to Pathway Hyperactivation and Increased β-Cell Apoptosis
The JNK pathway has a proapoptotic role in pancreatic β-cells (34,35). RNA sequencing analysis indicated that SRp55 KD affects the splicing of several members of the JNK pathway (Figs. 2D, 3E–G, and 6A). Moreover, several JNK signaling genes are upregulated after SRp55 silencing (Supplementary Table 6). To understand how these alterations affect JNK pathway activity, we first analyzed the phosphorylation state of the kinases MKK7 and JNK1, and the target transcription factor c-JUN. We observed that MKK7, JNK1, and c-JUN are hyperphosphorylated in SRp55-depeleted cells, whereas no changes in total protein levels were observed for MKK7 and JNK1 (Fig. 6B). We hypothesized that splicing alterations in JNK-related signaling genes alter the pathway activity, contributing to increased β-cell death. To test this, we first performed a double KD of JNK1 and SRp55. Inhibition of JNK1 in both EndoC-βH1 cells and human islets protected them against SRp55 KD–induced apoptosis (Fig. 6C–F). Next, we mimicked the impact of SRp55 depletion on the splicing of three JNK signaling kinases (MAP3K7, JNK1, and JNK2) using specific siRNAs against the SRp55-modified cassette exons in these genes. These siRNAs significantly increased the skipping of the cassette exons, recapitulating the effect of SRp55 KD (Figs. 6G–I). It is interesting to note that increased exon skipping in all three JNK-related genes was associated with increased apoptosis (Fig. 6J) and JNK hyperphosphorylation (Fig. 6K) in EndoC-βH1 cells. This supports the hypothesis that splicing alterations induced by SRp55 KD lead to hyperactivation of the JNK-regulated pathway and contribute to β-cell death.
SRp55 Depletion Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
RNA sequencing analysis showed that several genes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–associated protein degradation pathway displayed AS alterations after SRp55 depletion and that some ER stress markers were upregulated at the gene expression level (Fig. 7A). These findings suggest that reduced SRp55 levels affect ER function and may contribute to increased β-cell apoptosis. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the expression of several ER stress markers at the protein and mRNA levels. Increased levels of phosphorylated and total IRE1α (Fig. 7B and C) and phospho-eIF2α (Fig. 7B and E) were observed after SRp55 silencing. Moreover, induction of BIP (Fig. 7F) and XBP1 (Fig. 7G) spliced mRNA was detected by quantitative PCR, indicating that SRp55 deficiency may directly or indirectly lead to ER stress. No significant changes, however, were observed for phosphorylated and total PERK and CHOP (Fig. 7D and H). To determine whether ER stress indeed contributes to SRp55 KD–induced apoptosis, we performed double KD of IRE1α and SRp55 (Fig. 7I and J). IRE1α silencing protected EndoC-βH1 cells against death induced by SRp55 deficiency (Fig. 7K), demonstrating that defects in ER homeostasis and consequent ER stress promote apoptosis in SRp55-depleted cells.
Discussion
These findings indicate that SRp55 drives a crucial splicing program to preserve human pancreatic β-cell survival and function. SRp55 is highly expressed in human pancreatic β-cells, and its depletion leads to β-cell apoptosis and impaired insulin secretion. SRp55 levels are downregulated by proinflammatory cytokines and may contribute to cytokine-induced β-cell apoptosis. These observations suggest that SRp55 acts as a master splicing regulator of β-cell survival under both basal and immune-induced stress conditions. In line with these observations, SRp55 regulates AS of multiple transcripts involved in cell death, JNK signaling, insulin secretion, and ER stress, providing a mechanistic link between the observed phenotype and SRp55 targets.
Our group previously showed that SRp55 is transcriptionally regulated by the transcription factor Glis3 (9). The GLIS3 locus is associated with T1D and T2D (4,5) and with glucose metabolism traits in subjects without diabetes (36), and its inactivation leads to a severe form of monogenic diabetes in humans (6,37). GLIS3 is also required for β-cell survival (9), and defective Glis3 expression affects the unfolded protein response promoting β-cell fragility (38). We observed in these experiments that decreased SRp55 expression recapitulates many of the pathological features induced by GLIS3 deficiency, for example, increased β-cell apoptosis, defective insulin release, and ER stress, suggesting that SRp55 may act as an important downstream mediator of GLIS3 function.
AS modulates the function of many BCL-2 proteins and other apoptotic regulators, producing variants that differ in their localization, posttranslation regulation, or proapoptotic activity (39,40). Our RNA sequencing analysis revealed that SRp55 regulates several genes involved in pancreatic β-cell apoptosis, including several BCL-2 proteins. It is important to note that SRp55 depletion affects the splicing of the apoptotic activator BAX, promoting the expression of the constitutively active isoform BAX β. The canonical isoform BAX α contains a COOH-terminal transmembrane domain tucked into the dimerization pocket that maintains BAX α in an autoinhibited monomeric conformation in the cytosol. After proapoptotic signaling, BH3-only activators such as BIM and PUMA induce a conformational change on BAX α, promoting its oligomerization, its translocation to the mitochondria, permeabilization of the outer membrane, and activation of apoptosis (41). BAX β, on the other hand, retains intron 5, creating a distinct COOH-terminal domain that maintains it in a permanently activated conformation, leading to its spontaneous oligomerization and activation of apoptosis (33). In addition, BAX β can also act as a BH3-only activator able to activate BAX α (33). BAX α may also be activated by BIM S (42), shown here to be induced by SRp55 KD. The fact that independent KD of BAX β or BIM nearly completely prevents the increase in β-cell apoptosis observed after SRp55 KD suggests that both mechanisms are required to trigger the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis under these experimental conditions.
It is interesting that our data indicate that SRp55 regulates two other pathways potentially involved in β-cell death in cross talk with BCL-2 proteins, namely the JNK signaling cascade and ER stress. The JNK pathway has a pivotal role in integrating different stress signals and in promoting β-cell death (32,43,44). JNK1 signaling stimulates the transcription and activity of proapoptotic BCL-2 proteins through activation of the transcription factor c-JUN and through direct phosphorylation (32). Moreover, the JNK pathway is also activated by ER stress via the transmembrane protein IRE1α (45). Different JNK splice variants may differ in their enzymatic activities, substrates, and activation/deactivation kinetics (46,47). For instance, a single splice change in MKK7 is able to increase the JNK pathway activity in T cells (48). SRp55 depletion affects the splicing of several kinases of the JNK signaling cascade (as shown by the data presented here). These findings indicate that some of these changes modify the basal activity of the pathway, leading to JNK hyperactivation and contributing to β-cell apoptosis. JNK hyperactivation may also be secondary to the unfolded protein response via IRE1α signaling (45). We observed that SRp55 silencing induces basal ER stress. The mechanisms by which SRp55 deficiency triggers ER stress remains to be clarified, but splicing alterations in ER-associated protein degradation genes suggest that ER function may be compromised through defective disposal of terminally misfolded proteins.
Reduced SRp55 expression also leads to impaired insulin release. Insulin exocytosis is tightly coupled to glucose metabolism, requiring mitochondrial ATP production to induce the closure of KATP channels and the generation of Ca2+ influx that ultimately triggers the release of insulin (49). Our findings suggest that impaired insulin release induced by glucose is related to mitochondrial dysfunction. Furthermore, SRp55 silencing modifies the expression of genes and splice variants related to metabolic pathways, exocytosis, and calcium signaling, all of which potentially affect the regulation of insulin secretion. The findings described here are, however, correlative, and the precise mechanisms by which SRp55 depletion impairs β-cell function remain to be clarified.
In conclusion, the observations presented here indicate that SRp55 coordinates a splicing network of functionally interconnected genes in β-cells. These genes are required for β-cell survival and a functional phenotype. This suggests that alterations in SRp55—for instance, downstream of polymorphisms that decrease activity of the diabetes candidate gene GLIS3—may promote β-cell failure and loss in diabetes.
Supplementary Material
Article Information
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to Isabelle Millard, Anyishaï Musuaya, Nathalie Pachera, and Michaël Pangerl of the ULB Center for Diabetes Research for providing excellent technical support. The authors thank Hirokazu Hara (Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan) for providing the human SRp55 expression plasmid.
Funding. This work was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique Belgique (FNRS) (WELBIO CR-2015A-06), the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (T2DSYSTEMS, GA667191), and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases, and Human Islet Research Network Consortium (1UC4DK104166-01). J.J.-M. was supported by an H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowship grant (project reference 660449). M.I.A. was supported by a FRIA fellowship from the FNRS (reference no. 26410496). P.M. and D.L.E. have received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 115797 (INNODIA). This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, the JDRF, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.
Duality of Interest. No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author Contributions. J.J.-M., M.I.A., and D.L.E. conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. J.J.-M., M.I.A., J.-V.T., O.V., E.L.-M., F.A.G., and L.M. acquired data. M.B. and P.M. contributed material and reagents. All authors revised the manuscript. J.J.-M. and D.L.E. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Footnotes
This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/db17-0736/-/DC1.
J.J.-M. and M.I.A. are joint first authors.
L.M. is currently affiliated with the Cellular Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.
References
- 1.Cnop M, Welsh N, Jonas JC, Jörns A, Lenzen S, Eizirik DL. Mechanisms of pancreatic beta-cell death in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: many differences, few similarities. Diabetes 2005;54(Suppl. 2):S97–S107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rahier J, Guiot Y, Goebbels RM, Sempoux C, Henquin JC. Pancreatic beta-cell mass in European subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2008;10(Suppl. 4):32–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campbell-Thompson M, Fu A, Kaddis JS, et al. . Insulitis and β-cell mass in the natural history of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2016;65:719–731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barrett JC, Clayton DG, Concannon P, et al.; Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium . Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet 2009;41:703–707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, et al.; DIAGRAM Consortium; GIANT Consortium; Global BPgen Consortium; Anders Hamsten on behalf of Procardis Consortium; MAGIC investigators . New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet 2010;42:105–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Senée V, Chelala C, Duchatelet S, et al. . Mutations in GLIS3 are responsible for a rare syndrome with neonatal diabetes mellitus and congenital hypothyroidism. Nat Genet 2006;38:682–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.ZeRuth GT, Takeda Y, Jetten AM. The Krüppel-like protein Gli-similar 3 (Glis3) functions as a key regulator of insulin transcription. Mol Endocrinol 2013;27:1692–1705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang Y, Chang BH, Yechoor V, et al. . The Krüppel-like zinc finger protein GLIS3 transactivates neurogenin 3 for proper fetal pancreatic islet differentiation in mice. Diabetologia 2011;54:2595–2605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nogueira TC, Paula FM, Villate O, et al. . GLIS3, a susceptibility gene for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, modulates pancreatic beta cell apoptosis via regulation of a splice variant of the BH3-only protein Bim. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calarco JA, Zhen M, Blencowe BJ. Networking in a global world: establishing functional connections between neural splicing regulators and their target transcripts. RNA 2011;17:775–791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Papasaikas P, Rao A, Huggins P, Valcarcel J, Lopez A. Reconstruction of composite regulator-target splicing networks from high-throughput transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 2015;16(Suppl. 10):S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Villate O, Turatsinze JV, Mascali LG, et al. . Nova1 is a master regulator of alternative splicing in pancreatic beta cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:11818–11830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Juan-Mateu J, Rech TH, Villate O, et al. . Neuron-enriched RNA-binding proteins regulate pancreatic beta cell function and survival. J Biol Chem 2017;292:3466–3480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Eizirik DL, Sammeth M, Bouckenooghe T, et al. . The human pancreatic islet transcriptome: expression of candidate genes for type 1 diabetes and the impact of pro-inflammatory cytokines. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Juan-Mateu J, Villate O, Eizirik DL. Mechanisms in endocrinology: alternative splicing: the new frontier in diabetes research. Eur J Endocrinol 2016;174:R225–R238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen-Eliav M, Golan-Gerstl R, Siegfried Z, et al. . The splicing factor SRSF6 is amplified and is an oncoprotein in lung and colon cancers. J Pathol 2013;229:630–639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jensen MA, Wilkinson JE, Krainer AR. Splicing factor SRSF6 promotes hyperplasia of sensitized skin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014;21:189–197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ravassard P, Hazhouz Y, Pechberty S, et al. . A genetically engineered human pancreatic beta cell line exhibiting glucose-inducible insulin secretion. J Clin Invest 2011;121:3589–3597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kutlu B, Cardozo AK, Darville MI, et al. . Discovery of gene networks regulating cytokine-induced dysfunction and apoptosis in insulin-producing INS-1 cells. Diabetes 2003;52:2701–2719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eizirik DL, Sammeth M, Bouckenooghe T, et al. . The human pancreatic islet transcriptome: expression of candidate genes for type 1 diabetes and the impact of pro-inflammatory cytokines. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Montgomery SB, Sammeth M, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, et al. . Transcriptome genetics using second generation sequencing in a Caucasian population. Nature 2010;464:773–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shen S, Park JW, Lu ZX, et al. . rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:E5593–E5601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Park JW, Jung S, Rouchka EC, Tseng YT, Xing Y. rMAPS: RNA map analysis and plotting server for alternative exon regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44(W1):W333–W338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu HX, Zhang M, Krainer AR. Identification of functional exonic splicing enhancer motifs recognized by individual SR proteins. Genes Dev 1998;12:1998–2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Overbergh L, Valckx D, Waer M, Mathieu C. Quantification of murine cytokine mRNAs using real time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Cytokine 1999;11:305–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andersson LE, Valtat B, Bagge A, et al. . Characterization of stimulus-secretion coupling in the human pancreatic EndoC-βH1 beta cell line. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jeong S. SR proteins: Binders, regulators, and connectors of RNA. Mol Cells 2017;40:1–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang Z, Tian J, Zhang W, et al. . Forkhead protein FoxO1 acts as a repressor to inhibit cell differentiation in human fetal pancreatic progenitor cells. J Diabetes Res 2017;2017:6726901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schaffer AE, Taylor BL, Benthuysen JR, et al. . Nkx6.1 controls a gene regulatory network required for establishing and maintaining pancreatic Beta cell identity. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dassaye R, Naidoo S, Cerf ME. Transcription factor regulation of pancreatic organogenesis, differentiation and maturation. Islets 2016;8:13–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gurzov EN, Eizirik DL. Bcl-2 proteins in diabetes: mitochondrial pathways of β-cell death and dysfunction. Trends Cell Biol 2011;21:424–431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fu NY, Sukumaran SK, Kerk SY, Yu VC. Baxbeta: a constitutively active human Bax isoform that is under tight regulatory control by the proteasomal degradation mechanism. Mol Cell 2009;33:15–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mokhtari D, Myers JW, Welsh N. The MAPK kinase kinase-1 is essential for stress-induced pancreatic islet cell death. Endocrinology 2008;149:3046–3053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gurzov EN, Ortis F, Bakiri L, Wagner EF, Eizirik DL. JunB inhibits ER stress and apoptosis in pancreatic beta cells. PLoS One 2008;3:e3030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boesgaard TW, Grarup N, Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Pedersen O; Meta-Analysis of Glucose and Insulin-Related Trait Consortium (MAGIC) . Variants at DGKB/TMEM195, ADRA2A, GLIS3 and C2CD4B loci are associated with reduced glucose-stimulated beta cell function in middle-aged Danish people. Diabetologia 2010;53:1647–1655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dimitri P, Habeb AM, Gurbuz F, et al. . Expanding the clinical spectrum associated with GLIS3 mutations[published correction appears in J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4685]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:E1362–E1369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dooley J, Tian L, Schonefeldt S, et al. . Genetic predisposition for beta cell fragility underlies type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 2016;48:519–527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Akgul C, Moulding DA, Edwards SW. Alternative splicing of Bcl-2-related genes: functional consequences and potential therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004;61:2189–2199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwerk C, Schulze-Osthoff K. Regulation of apoptosis by alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell 2005;19:1–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Annis MG, Soucie EL, Dlugosz PJ, et al. . Bax forms multispanning monomers that oligomerize to permeabilize membranes during apoptosis. EMBO J 2005;24:2096–2103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marani M, Tenev T, Hancock D, Downward J, Lemoine NR. Identification of novel isoforms of the BH3 domain protein Bim which directly activate Bax to trigger apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:3577–3589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cunha DA, Hekerman P, Ladrière L, et al. . Initiation and execution of lipotoxic ER stress in pancreatic beta-cells. J Cell Sci 2008;121:2308–2318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cunha DA, Igoillo-Esteve M, Gurzov EN, et al. . Death protein 5 and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis mediate the endoplasmic reticulum stress-mitochondrial dialog triggering lipotoxic rodent and human β-cell apoptosis. Diabetes 2012;61:2763–2775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, et al. . Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science 2000;287:664–666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Figuera-Losada M, LoGrasso PV. Enzyme kinetics and interaction studies for human JNK1β1 and substrates activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-Jun). J Biol Chem 2012;287:13291–13302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zeke A, Misheva M, Reményi A, Bogoyevitch MA. JNK signaling: regulation and functions based on complex protein-protein partnerships. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2016;80:793–835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Martinez NM, Agosto L, Qiu J, et al. . Widespread JNK-dependent alternative splicing induces a positive feedback loop through CELF2-mediated regulation of MKK7 during T-cell activation. Genes Dev 2015;29:2054–2066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Henquin JC. The dual control of insulin secretion by glucose involves triggering and amplifying pathways in β-cells. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;93(Suppl. 1):S27–S31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.