Abstract
Biological aspects and demographic parameters of Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and Prorops nasuta Waterston (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) parasitoids of the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) were investigated using diet-reared CBB hosts. Developmental time from eggs to adults, oviposition, and postoviposition period were comparable for both parasitoids. However, P. nasuta had a considerably longer preoviposition and longevity period averaging 17.3 and 63.1 d, respectively. The reproductive rate for C. stephanoderis was 46.1 daughters per female with a mean generation time of 47.4 d, whereas P. nasuta had a reproductive rate of 18.3 daughters per female in a mean time of 58.6 d. Oviposition behavior was also different with C. stephanoderis typically ovipositing on CBB prepupae and pupae, while P. nasuta preferred prepupae and second-instar CBB larvae. An abridged cohort life table for both parasitoids was constructed for growth rates estimations.
Keywords: Cenibroca diet, Cephalonomia stephanoderis, Prorops nasuta, African parasitoids, life table
The coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), is a key pest in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) worldwide. Management of CBB has traditionally been accomplished through IPM including sampling and monitoring, cultural harvesting, postharvest control, pest management during ‘zoqueo’, use of Beauveria bassiana, and release of parasitoids (Aristizabal et al. 2016). A great interest exists in the potential for mass rearing of African parasitic wasps to reduce the damage produced by this pest. Among the most recognized biological control agents are the parasitoids, Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and Prorops nasuta Waterston (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). The practical use of P. nasuta and C. stephanoderis in biological control programs began in 1929 and 1988, respectively. Murphy and Moore (1990), Portilla and Bustillo (1995), Bustillo et al. (1996), Portilla and Streett (2008), and Aristizabal et al. (2011) reported that in coffee producing countries where CBB is causing economic damage, these parasitoids have been reared under laboratory conditions and subsequently released. Nevertheless, to date, no classical introduction has provided satisfactory control due to the large numbers of parasitoids required to be released per infested coffee berries. Such demand for parasitoids is quite high to be supplied with in vivo rearing (naturally infested coffee berries or parchment coffee rearing methods). However, field studies have demonstrated establishment under field condition years after release for both C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta (Puzzi 1939, Benassi 1995, Portilla and Bustillo 1995, Bustillo et al. 1996, Aristizabal et al. 1998, Quintero et al. 1998), showing promises as a management tool for CBB control.
Information on the parasitoids’ life histories has been studied by Abraham et al. (1990); Infante et al. (1992, 1994); Infante and Barrera (1993); Bustillo et al. (1996); Portilla (1999a); Portilla and Streett (2008); Portilla et al. (2014); and Vijayalakshmi et al. 2014. The females enter the coffee berry and feed on CBB eggs, larvae, prepupae, and adults. It appears that females for both C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta must feed on larvae or prepupae in order to develop eggs (Portilla and Streett 2008). The preoviposition period for both species lasts for several days (Murphy and Moore 1990). C. stephanoderis eggs are normally oviposited on the ventral surface of CBB larvae and prepupae and the dorso-abdominal region of the pupae. P. nasuta exhibited no marked oviposition site preference for deposition (Abraham et al. 1990, Portilla et al. 2014). Lateral-abdominal oviposition only on prepupa has been reported for P. nasuta (Waterson 1923; Hargreaves 1926, 1935; Puzzi 1939; Toledo 1942; Abraham et al. 1990; Murphy and Rangi 1991), whereas pupae and prepupae have been reported for C. stephanoderis (Infante 1993, Portilla 1999a).
Mass production of these parasitoids is directly linked to CBB host production, and life tables for both parasitoid and pest are important to gain a better understanding on how to maintain equilibrium without a negative impact in one or both populations (Portilla et al. 2014). For example, complete and abridged life tables can be used for parasitoids depending on their oviposition behavior as endoparasitoids, ectoparasitoids, or if they attack single or multiple stages (Carey et al. 1988). There are a number of exceptions, including C. stephanoderis, and P. nasuta, that attack larvae, prepupae, pupae, and sometimes pharate adults (Portilla 1999a). C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta are idiobionts ectoparasitoids, which allow construction of complete cohort life tables. However, on the rate of increase and demographic parameters such as net maternity, there is little available information. Infante et al. (1993) and Portilla (1999a) found that fecundity and survivorships were largely affected by the extremes of temperature; high mortality was found in immature stages for C. stephanoderis at 17°C, while at 37°C, all specimens died. The longevity was inversely related to temperature, although fecundity rate was reduced (Portilla 1999b).
Studies conducted in Colombia demonstrated that CBB could be controlled in commercial coffee farms using inoculative and inundative releases of the African parasistoid C. stephanoderis, when the infestation is lower than 5% (20 wasps every 2 mo per infested berry) (Salazar et al. 2002). Portilla (1999c) based on the results of Salazar et al. (2002) assessed approximately how many wasps should be used per releases by using a simulation model for improving ecological and economic recommendations for the control of the CBB in Colombia (Developed by Adrian Leach funded by The Department for International Development, United Kingdom) (Portilla 1999c). She gave the following example: The coffee harvest distribution of a hectare of 5,000 coffee trees with approximately 1,500 ripe berries per tree and 5% of CBB infestation would need about 4,400,000/ha (20 wasps per infested berry) to keep the CBB population under the threshold (2% of infestation). These wasps would be distributed through the year with releases every 2 mo as follow: February (260,000 wasps/ha), April (100,000 wasps/ha), June (480,000 wasps/ha), August (380,000 wasps/ha), October (2,000,000 wasps/ha), and December (1,200,000 wasps/ha). Producing those large numbers of parasitoids in a cost-effective way will depend on well-designed production facilities using industrial level mechanized and automated rearing processes only. Portilla 1999a and Portilla and Streett 2008 reviewed and discussed the requirements for a semiautomation system for mass production of CBB and its African parasitoids including diet preparation, sanitation, environmental factors, quality control, storage, and distribution. Unfortunately, no studies have examined calculation costs between the in vivo (naturally infested berries or parchment coffee methods) and the in vitro (artificial diet) rearing system for parasitoids production. However, to the best of our knowledge, no in vivo rearing system currently available will be able to supply such demand.
This study was conducted to obtain information on the biological parameters and fertility rates of these parasitoid species in an effort to get a better understanding how to improve our ability to rear large numbers for field release. Parasitoids were reared on CBB using Cenibroca artificial diet. Abridged cohort life tables for both parasitoids were constructed for growth rate estimations. Results are presented with tables and figures with a detailed description of all biological factors obtained by daily observations in life-table construction.
Materials and Methods
Insect Colonies
This study was conducted at the USDA-ARS, Biological Control of Pests Research Unit (BCPRU), Starkville, MS. Adults of CBB and parasitoids were from colonies established in 1999 (Portilla et al. 2014) and maintained previously in the National Research Center of Coffee (CENICAFE) in Chinchina, Colombia. The colonies were shipped to the quarantine facility, Stoneville, MS, in 1999. The parasitoids and their host were reared according to the methods described by Portilla and Streett (2008). Rearing occurred in an environmental room with a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h, 27°C (±1.5°C), and 55 (±10%) RH (Portilla 1999a). The Cenibroca diet was used to rear CBB and was prepared according to the procedures found in Portilla and Streett (2006).
Biological Parameters of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta
Cohorts of 291 recently parasitized hosts by C. stephanoderis and 547 recently parasitized hosts by P. nasuta were used for this study. The size of cohort depended on availability. Each cohort was divided into 13 subcohorts (replicates) and placed into rearing containers (20 and 40 parasitized hosts per container, respectively) (Pioneer plastic 032C, Dixon, KY). They were held inside the environmental chambers (16:8 [L:D] h photoperiod, temperature of 25°C, and 55% RH) and kept until the last adult was obtained. Parasitized hosts were observed every day. Total number of parasitoids surviving from egg through adult and adult emergence was recorded on a daily basis for each species.
Twenty-five extra hosts recently parasitized by C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta were individually placed into Petri dishes 25 × 11 mm (Thermo Fisher 121V) and observed daily to determine egg, larva, prepupa, and pupa developmental time. From the 13 groups of each species, 15 copulated females were taken and individually confined into larger Petri dishes (35 × 11 mm) that contained 30 CBB immature stages (10 second-instar larvae, 10 prepupae, and10 pupae) for oviposition as well as few eggs and first-instar larvae for feeding. The number of eggs oviposited every day by each parasitoid of both bethylids were counted and recorded until the last wasp was dead. Petri dishes were cleaned daily removing any dead or parasitized hosts and replacing them with new ones. Means of number of eggs oviposited per each female, longevity, pre-post, reproductive, and reproductive periods of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta and their host preference for ovipositing were determined. The progeny of each female was maintained until adult emergence when sex ratio was determined.
Demographic Parameter of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta
Abridged life tables for both species of parasitoid were calculated according to Portilla et al. (2014). Immature survival was calculated using the subcohorts for each parasitoid species. The fraction of death was calculated by the sum of all dead in each developmental stage and divided for the total beginning stages (synthetic cohort). This value was used for incorporating in the adult survival parameter (lx). Data obtained for the number of parasitic females alive each day at each age (x) and the number of eggs oviposited each day were used to calculate the basic population parameters: gross maternity (Mx), survival (Lx), fecundity (mx), net maternity function (lx.mx), net reproductive rate (Ro), finite rate of increase (λ), intrinsic rate of increase (rm), mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) (Krebs 2001, Pressat 1985, Carey 1993).
Statistical Analysis
One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test (SAS Institute, 2013) were used to compare life-table parameters, developmental time, preoviposition and oviposition period, longevity, immature mortality, and host preference. Nonparametric estimates of the survival function of females were compered between parasitoid species by using PROC LIFETEST test procedure in SAS (SAS 2013). Regression analysis was used to determine differences in cumulative gross fecundity between C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta.
Results
Biological Parameters of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta
The percentages of host parasitized being offered equal numbers of second instar larvae, prepupae, and pupae of CBB of both parasitoids are presented in Fig. 1. C. stephanoderis had high percentages of parasitism in prepupae (60.85 ± 11.67 [SE]) followed by pupae (36.61 ± 11.28 [SE]) and only small populations of parasitized second-stage larvae were observed (2.52 ± 1.77 [SE]), whereas P. nasuta had a high preference for prepupae (50.29 ± 13.47 [SE]) followed by second-instar larvae (45.07 ± 14.72 [SE]) and occasionally parasitized pupae were observed (4.63 ± 3.15 [SE]). There were significant differences among preferences of parasitism percentage (df = 1, 28; P = < 0.0001; F = 123.33, 5.49, 79.15 for second-instar larvae, prepupae, and pupae, respectively). The developmental time to egg (F = 80.93; df = 1, 48; P = 0.0001), larvae (F = 11.19; df = 1, 48; P = 0.0016), and cocoon (F = 32.05; df = 1, 48; P = 0.0001) was significantly different among species. There were no statistical differences for prepupae (F = 0.05; df = 1, 48; P = 0.8295) and pupae (F = 0.91; df = 1, 48; P = 0.3437) between parasitoids (Table 1). Cocoons were formed in 2 d for both parasitoid species. No cocoons were formed in 51.65% of C. stephanoderis’s population and 42.46% of P. nasuta, but individuals still developed to adult maturity.
Fig. 1.
Hosts preference percentage parasitized by C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta. Bars not sharing the same uppercase letter are significantly different. (Tukey’s test P = 0.05) (means ± SE).
Table 1.
Mean developmental time for the immature stages of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta developed on diet-reared CBB hosts
| Life stages | Developmental times (d) | (Mean ± SE) |
|---|---|---|
| C. stephanoderis | P. nasuta | |
| Egg | 3.00 ± 0.58a | 4.48 ± 0.49b |
| Larva | 4.16 ± 0.84a | 4.96 ± 0.63b |
| Cocoon | 3.84 ± 0.62a | 2.84 ± 0.51b |
| Prepupae | 4.08 ± 0.65a | 4.12 ± 0.53a |
| Pupa | 13.60 ± 1.03a | 13.32 ± 0.85a |
| Total time to adult | 28.68 ± 1.58a | 29.72 ± 1.05b |
Means ± SE followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test) (N = 25 per species).
The proportion of death in each immature stage of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta is presented in the Table 2. Using GLM analysis, parasitoids had a marked difference in survival between species for both eggs (F = 11.17; df = 1, 24; P = 0.0027) and pupae (F = 23.70; df = 1, 24; P = 0.0001), while no differences in survival were observed for larvae (F = 4.21; df = 1, 24; P = 0.0512) (Table 2) . A comparison of female progeny production among species revealed that C. stephanoderis had a significantly higher reproduction than that of P.nasuta (F = 15.95; df = 1, 28; P = 0.0004). There were significant differences in female production per day (F = 151.85; df = 1, 940; P = 0.0001), where C. stephanoderis female were found ovipositing 2.22 ± 0.06 (SE) eggs/day/female and P. nasuta 1.21 ± 0.06 (SE) eggs/day/female. In general, both parasitods species were normally found ovipositing from one to three eggs per day. However, sporadic ovipositions from four to seven eggs per day were observed for C. stephanoderis and from four to five eggs per day for P. nasuta. The number of eggs per wasp varied from 38 to 114 eggs for C. stephanoderis and 6 to 88 eggs for P. nasuta. Suggesting that it could be related to the amount of CBB stages provided during their entire life (about 300 CBB stages). Percentage of number of eggs oviposited per female among species is presented in Fig. 2. No C. stephanoderis population was found with <20 eggs per wasp and 0% of P. nasuta population had >100 eggs per parasitoid. In total, 20% of C. stephanoderis and 55% of P. nasuta population was found ovipositing 20–50 eggs per female, while 53% of C. stephanoderis and 20 % of P. nasuta population was found ovipositing 50–100 eggs per female.
Table 2.
Immature stage mortality for C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta developed on diet-reared CBB hosts
| Stages/parameters | Percentage immature mortality (mean ± SE) | |
|---|---|---|
| C. stephanoderis | P. nasuta | |
| Eggs | 4.17 ± 4.08a | 12.33 ± 7.10b |
| Larvae | 11.09 ± 6.31a | 17.93 ± 9.74a |
| Pupae | 1.4 ± 1.89a | 12.61 ± 7.53b |
| Cumulative mortality | 16.12 ± 6.98a | 36.31 ± 14.66b |
| Survival to adulhood | 83.87 ± 6.42a | 63.69 ± 15.08b |
Means + SE followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Fig. 2.
Population percentage of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta oviposition number of eggs per female (n = 15 parasitoid females).
Both parasitic wasps had a different behavior on host parasitisation. C. stephanoderis oviposited a single egg per host and did not oviposit until the host was completely paralysed, whereas P. nasuta could oviposited more than one egg on host when they still moving, although the host have had various stinging. This behavior could explain the statistic differences found on their pre-reproductive period (F = 16.56; df = 1, 28; P = 0.0003) and longevity (F = 7.55; df = 1, 28; P = 0.0104). Preoviposition period (17.26 ± 10.57 d) and longevity (63.13 ± 13.23 d) were significantly longer for P. nasuta as compared to C. stephanoderis, (4.25 ± 0.43 and 46.66 ± 15.41 d). GLM showed no significant differences among parasitoids on reproductive (F = 0.83; df = 1, 28; P = 0.3706) and postreproductive periods (F = 3.98; df = 1, 28; P = 0.0559) (Table 3). During their postreproductive period both wasp species continued feeding upon their hosts. Both parasitoid species tended to produce more females than males, but their sex ratio varied among species. Total eggs deposited by C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta and sex ratio among paratitoids are presented in Table 4.
Table 3.
Preoviposition, oviposition, and postoviposition periods, and longevity of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta developed on diet-reared CBB hosts
| Periods | Developmental times (d) | (Means + SE) |
|---|---|---|
| C. stephanoderis | P. nasuta | |
| Preoviposition | 4.53 ± 0.43a | 17.26 ± 10.57b |
| Oviposition | 32.13 ± 13.16a | 28.40 ± 8.42a |
| Postoviposition | 11.00 ± 8.54a | 17.46 ± 8.58a |
| Adult longevity | 47.66 ± 15.41a | 63.13 ± 13.23b |
Means ± SE followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different (P = 0.05, Tukey’s test) (N = 15 per species).
Table 4.
Total production and sex ratio of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta developed on diet-reared CBB hosts
| Variable | Parasitoids | |
|---|---|---|
| C. stephanoderis | P. nasuta | |
| Total eggs oviposited | 1,101 | 540 |
| Total adult emerged | 815 | 388 |
| Total females | 702 | 302 |
| Total males | 113 | 86 |
| Sex ratio | 6.2:1 | 3.5:1 |
Life-Table Parameter of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta
Life-table data indicated differences between the two parasitoid species. For example, mean daily egg production (Mx) for C. stephanoderis increased to almost 4.0-fold during the first week and remained at high numbers of egg production until the end of the second week (Fig. 3A). Subsequently, the production of this parasitoid declined over the next 5- to 6-wk period reaching zero by about day 50. Alternatively, P. nasuta showed a constant trend in production from day 19 to day 45. Mortality, analyzed by the test of equality with the strata statement in –log (survival probability) PROC LIFETEST, indicated significant differences among parasitoids (Log-Rank X2 = 11.10, df = 1, P < 0.0009) (Fig. 3B). Differences in the cumulative gross fecundity, indicating a logarithmic regression type with r2 values of 0.997 and 0.979 for C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta, respectively, is illustrated in Fig. 3C.
Fig. 3.
Life-table data of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta restricted to adult stage. (A) gross fecundity (Mx); (B) survival (lx); and (C) regression of cumulative gross fecundity.
Seven life-table parameters are presented in Table 5. The higher gross fecundity occurred for C. stephanoderis with 73.06 ± 26.22 (SE) eggs per wasp, while 35.93 ± 24.68 (SE) eggs per wasp was obtained to P. nasuta. Finite rate of increase (λ) is the factor by which a population increases each day and is determined by the intrinsic rate of increase (rm). C. stephanoderis had the highest finite rate of increase. The growth rate per generation of C. stephanoderis was 46.15 female wasps per newborn female with a mean time of 47.39 d. The daily growth rate was 1.09 daughter females per female, doubling this number in 6.5 d. The growth generation for P. nasuta was 18.33 daughter females per female with a mean time of 58.60 d; its daily growth rate was 1.05 females per female doubling this number in 13.12 d.
Table 5.
Life-table statistic for C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta reared on H. hampei developed on diet-reared CBB hosts
| Parameters and units | Parasotoids | |
|---|---|---|
| C. stephanoderis | P. nasuta | |
| Gross fecundity (Mx)a | 81.32 | 39.44 |
| Fecundity (mx)b | 67.99 | 31.09 |
| Net reproductive rate (R0)c | 46.15 | 18.33 |
| Mean generation time (T)d | 47.39 | 58.60 |
| Doubling time (DT)e | 7.78 | 13.12 |
| Intrinsic rate of increasef | 0.089 | 0.052 |
| Finite rate of increase (λ)g | 1.09 | 1.05 |
aTotal offspring/female.
bFemales/female at age x.
cDaughters/new-born female (Population which increases each generation).
dMean age of reproduction (d).
eTime required for (λ) to doubling number.
fRate of natural increase (daughters/female/day).
gIndividuals/female/day.
Discussion
The parasitic wasps C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta are idiobionts ectoparasitoids that attack every stage of CBB ovipositing on final-stage larvae (2.52 and 45.07%), prepupal (60.85 and 50.29%), and the pupal stages (36.61 and 4.63%), respectively, which is quite common among idiobiont ectoparasitoids (Shaw 1994). Both parasitoids preferred to feed on pupae rather than eggs or early instar larvae. The percentages of host preference obtained in this work differ from Barrera et al. (1989) and Abraham et al. (1990) who found that C. stephanoderis preferred ovipositing on pupae rather than prepupae. However, Infante (1993) observed 55.4% of eggs on prepupae and 44.6% on pupae. Portilla (1999) found similar results for C. stephanoderis, which was exposed to different temperatures . Lateral-abdominal oviposition occurring only on prepupa has been reported for P. nasuta by Waterson (1923); Hargreaves (1926, 1935); Puzzi (1939); Toledo (1942); Abraham et al. (1990); and Murphy and Rangi (1991). Oviposition was never seen on prepupa except by Toledo (1942). In this study, P. nasuta was found ovipositing eggs on the dorso-abdominal of the pupa and in a variety of areas on both prepupa and second-instar larval of CBB.
There are two general forms of the life table, using original or hypothetical cohorts (Carey 1993). The first is the cohort life table, which provides a longitudinal perspective that includes the mortality experience of a particular cohort from the moment of birth through consecutive ages until no individuals remain in the original cohort. The second is the abridged life table, which assumes a hypothetical cohort subject throughout its lifetime to the age-specific mortality rates prevailing for the actual population over a specific period. Most aspects of the life history of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta have been collected from studies carried out in captivity using a hypothetical cohort. This is because under normal circumstances, its complete life cycle is not feasible. Several studies have reported comparative data for different feeding regimes, temperatures, and some aspects of oviposition behavior and reproductive potential. Koch (1973) showed that C. stephanoderis has a developmental time of 23.2, 20.0, 15.2, and 14.6 d at 24, 27, 30, and 32°C, respectively. Also, the preoviposition time varied from 8.0 d at 21°C to 2.0 d at 27°C. However, 10 d at 17°C and 2 d at 32°C was the preoviposition period identified by Infante (1993). Portilla (1999) found that the preoviposition period occurred in 4.5 d at 23°C, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.1 d at 25, 27, and 29°C, respectively. She also reported developmental times of 28.1, 25.1, 23.2, and 19.9 d at 23, 25, 27, and 29°C, respectively. Eggs hatch varied from 4.1 d at 23°C to 2.9 d at 29°C, Abraham et al. 1990 found that at 25ºC eggs hatched in 1.61 d. Murphy and Rangi (1991) reported that P. nasuta needed 5.3 d for preoviposition and 30.6 d from egg to adult at 27ºC and 75% RH. At 25ºC and 90% RH, Abraham, et al. (1990) obtained a preoviposition period of 14 d and development time of 22.4 d at 25°C.
The statistical analysis of the synthetic cohort used for C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta permitted the construction of abridged life-table functions, which were computed daily over their entire life. The development time from egg to adult did not vary appreciably from results obtained by different researchers with temperatures of 25°C. P. nasuta had a higher mortality value for every immature stage in comparison to C. stephanoderis (Table 2). The low mortality of C. stephanoderis is probably reflected in the ability of the female to select high-quality hosts (large and healthy) for oviposition, whereas P. nasuta was observed ovipositing eggs on larvae when the paralysis process was uncompleted. The capacity of predation of P. nasuta is another characteristic that impacts mortality, due to the female ovipositing eggs on the host where predation was initiated and even oviposited on small larvae. In effect, this type of stage selection does not provide all the resources necessary for its survival. These behavioral characteristics for P. nasuta provide a better understanding why this parasitoid has been difficult to rear under laboratory conditions. Portilla (1999a) reported only 28.4 stages per parchment coffee at 25 d after infestation, and from this population only a 29.09% has the probability to be parasitized by C. stephanoderis. This percentage would be lower if the same population was parasitized by P. nasuta.
In captivity, and under good conditions, many wasp species will live 1 or 2 mo (Quicke 1997) . Barrera et al. (1989) investigated the effect of adult diet on longevity of C. stephanoderis. He mentioned that longer longevity was found (77 d) when the adults were procided a honey–water mixture. However, Murphy and Rangi (1991) reported only 2 d for P. nasuta when fed honey and there were no significant differences when fed CBB pupas and adults with no additional food. The same authors reported 14 d when P. nasuta was fed CBB eggs and larvae. The larger longevity of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta found in this study could be related to the amount of suitable hosts provided during their entire life (almost 300 CBB stages per female wasp). Fecundity ranges enormously in parasitic wasps and depends upon several factors, including species, size, and diet (Jervis and Copland 1996). Abraham et al. (1990) found that female C. stephanoderis could lay 1–3 eggs and occasionally 4 per day and produce up to 70 eggs during her life. Barrera et al. (1989) found up to 9 eggs per parasitoid per day and the most fecund individual produced 139 eggs in 66 d. In this study, the numbers of eggs per C. stephanoderis varied from 34 to 114, and from 6 to 88 to P. nasuta. C. stephanoderis, on average, oviposited 81 eggs per wasp in 47.6 d and in comparison, P. nasuta oviposited 47 eggs in 63.1 d. These results indicate that under field conditions, females of C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta never obtain enough hosts to achieve full reproductive potential. Several studies confirmed that females always predominate in these two bethilides. The field sex ratio of the parasitic wasp C. stephanoderis recorded by Ticheler (1961) was 4.8 females per 1 male, and Koch (1973) found 2.7 females per 1 male. Barrera et al. (1993) obtained a sex ratio of 7:1 under laboratory condition, while Benassi (1998) found a P nasuta a sex ratio of 5.2 females per male. This ratio varied through various generations, with 28.5 females per male after five generations. The sex ratio obtained in this work was 6.2: 1 and 3.5: 1 for C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta, respectively.
According to these results C. stephanoderis produced more females per female than P. nasuta (Ro), but both parasitoids need at less 50 suitable host stages to assure progeny. The speed at which the colony increased (rm) is the most important parameter, and C. stephanoderis obtained a high intrinsic rate of increase. Mass production of both parasitoids depends on the host reproductive potential, and hence, these results provide insight as to why the parasitoids have been so unsuccessful in the field, because to proliferate they evidently need a range of host stages. If a wasp attacks an immature berry, it will encountered only eggs and young larvae which they may consume and kill the CBB female as well, but the female parasitoid will not produce any offspring (Baker 1999, Ruiz-Cardenas and Baker 2010). In addition, if the wasp arrives too late, they will find mostly adult CBB and have to wait until they start breeding, by which time harvest may intervene. All this suggests that C. stephanoderis and P. nasuta will be incompatible with efficient commercial production. However, we must consider studies that have demonstrated that a high number of wasps per hectare (20 wasps per infested berry every 6 mo) can control CBB or keep it under controls in plots with less than 5% of CBB infestation (Aristizabal et al. 1997, Salazar and Baker 2002, Aristizabal et al. 2011).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Luis Carlos Jojoa former technician at USDA, ARS, BCPRU, Starkville, for their valuable support in rearing the host and parasitoid colonies. We are also grateful to Carlos Blanco (SIMRU-ARS-USDA) and Arnubio Valencia (Nebraska University, Department of Entomology) for critically reviewing an early version of this manuscript.
References Cited
- Abraham Y. J., Moore D., and Godwin G.. 1990. Rearing and aspects of biology of Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) parasitoids of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 80:121–128. [Google Scholar]
- Aristizabal L. F., Baker P. S., Orozco J., and Chavez B.. 1997. Parasitismo de Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Betrem) sobre una poblacion the Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) con niveles bajos de infestacion en campo. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 23:157–164. [Google Scholar]
- Aristizabal L. F., Baker P. S., Orozco J., and Chavez B.. 1998. Effecto del parasitoide Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) sobre las poblaciones de Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) durante y despues de la cosecha. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 24:149–155. [Google Scholar]
- Aristizabal L. F., Jimenez M., Bustillo A. E., and Arthurs S. P.. 2011. Introduction of parasitoids of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on small coffee plantations in Colombia through farmer participatory methods development. Fla. Entomol. 94: 690–693. [Google Scholar]
- Aristizabal L. F. and Bustillo A. E., Arthurs S. P.. 2016. Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer: strategies from Latin American that could be useful for coffee farmers in Hawaii. Insects. 7:1–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker P. 1999. La broca del café en Colombia: informe final del proyecto MIP para el café DFID—Cenicafe. CABI Bioscience, Ascot, United Kingdom: 118. [Google Scholar]
- Barrera J. F., Castillo A., Infante F., Gómez J., and De La Rosa W.. 1989. Biologie de C. Stephanoderis (Betrem) (Himenóptera: Bethylidae) en laboratorio. Cicle bioloque, capasite de oviposition, et emergente du fruit du cafeier. Café Cacao, The Francia. 33: 101–108. [Google Scholar]
- Benassi V. L. 1995. Levantamiento dos inimigos naturais da broca du café Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) no norte du Espiritu Santo. An. Soc. Entomol. 24: 635–638. [Google Scholar]
- Bustillo A., Orozco J., Benavides P., and Portilla M.. 1996. Producción masiva y uso de parasitoides para el control de la broca del café en Colombia. Rev. Col. Entomol. 47: 215–230. [Google Scholar]
- Carey J. R. 1993. Applied demography for biologist with special emphasis on insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, p. 206. [Google Scholar]
- Carey J. R., Wong T. Y., and Ramadan M. M.. 1988. Demographic framework for parasitoid mass rearing: case study of Biosteres tryony (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a larval parasitoid of tephritid fruit flies. Theor. Popul. Biol. 34: 279–296. [Google Scholar]
- Hargreaves H. 1926. Notes on the Coffee berry bore. Bull. Entomol. Res. 16: 347–354. [Google Scholar]
- Hargreaves H, 1935. Stephanoderis hampei Ferr. Coffee berry borer in Uganda. East Afri. Agric. 1:218–224. [Google Scholar]
- Infante F. and Barrera L. J.. 1993. Estadísticos demográficos de Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Himenóptera: Bethylidae) a temperaturas constantes. Folia. Entomol. Mex. 87: 61–72. [Google Scholar]
- Infante F., Barrera L. J., Gomez J., and Castillo A.. 1992. Thermal constants for pre-marginal development of the parasitoid Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). Can. Ent. 124: 935–941. [Google Scholar]
- Infante F., Valdes J., Penagos V., and Barrera J.. 1994. Description of the life stages of Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), a parasitoid of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Vedalia. 1: 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Jervis M. A. and Copland M. J.. 1996. The life cycle. In: M. A. Jervis and N. Kidd (ed.), Insect natural enemies. Chapman and Hall, London: pp. 63–161. [Google Scholar]
- Krebs C. J. 2001. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 5th ed Wesley Longman, San Francisco, CA: p. 695. [Google Scholar]
- Kock V. J. 1973. Abondance de Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. Scolyte des graines de café en function de sa plante hote et de son parasite Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem en Cote de’ Ivore. Medd. Landbou. 73: 1–85. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy S. and Moore D.. 1990. Biological control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae): previous programs and possibilities for the future. Biol. Control. 11: 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy S. T. and Rangi D. K.. 1991. The use of the African wasp, Prorops nasuta for the control of the Coffee Berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei in Mexico and Ecuador: the Introduction program. Insect. Sci. Applic. 12: 27–34. [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. 1999a. Mass rearing technique for Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) on Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera Scolytidae) developed using Cenibroca artificial diet. Rev. Col. Entomol. 25: 57–66. [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. 1999b. Desarrollo y evaluación de una dieta artificial para la cría masiva de Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Rev. Col. Entomol. 1: 24–38. [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. 1999c. Mass production of Cephalonomia stephanoderis on Hypothenemus hampei reared using artificial diet. Thesis. Univerisity of London, England: 253 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. and Bustillo A.. 1995. Nuevas investigaciones en la cría masiva de Hypothenemus hampei y de sus parasitoides Cephalonomia stephanoderis y Prorops nasuta. Rev. Col. Entomol. 21: 25–33. [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. and Streett D.. 2006. Nuevas técnicas de producción masiva de Hypothenemus hampei sobre la dieta artificial Cenibroca modificada. Rev. Col. Entomol. 57: 37–50 [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M. and Streett D.. 2008. Avances investigativos en la producción masiva automatizada de la broca del café Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) y de sus parasitoides sobre dietas artificiales. Sis. Agroeco. Mod. Biomatematics. 1:9–12 [Google Scholar]
- Portilla M., Ramos-Morales J., Rojas G., and Blanco C.. 2014. Life tables as tools of evaluation and quality control for arthropods mas production. In: J., Morales-Ramos (ed.) Mass production of beneficial organisms, pp. 241–275. Academic Press, New York: 742 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Pressat R. 1985. The dictionary of demography. Bell and Bain, Ltd, Glosgow. [Google Scholar]
- Puzzi D. 1939. Valor du parasitismo da Prorops nasuta Waterson no cambate a brocada cafe. J. Agrono. 2: 259–264. [Google Scholar]
- Quintero C., Bustillo A. E., Benavides P., and Chavez B.. 1998. Evidencia del establecimiento de Cephalonomia stephanoderis y Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) en cafetales del departamento de Nariño, Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 24:141–147. [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz-Cardenas R. and Baker P.. 2010. Life table of Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) in relation to coffee berry phenology under Colombian field conditions. Sci. Agric. 67: 658–668. [Google Scholar]
- Salazar H. M. and Baker P.. 2002. Impacto de liberaciones de Cephalonomia stephanoderis sobre poblaciones de Hypothenemus hampei. Rev. Col. Entomol. 53: 306–316. [Google Scholar]
- SAS Institute 2013. SAS/STAT user’s manual, version 9, 4th ed SAS Institute, Cary, NC. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw M. 1994. Parasitoid host range. In: B.A. Hanwkins and W. Sheeham (eds.). Parasitoid community ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 11–144. [Google Scholar]
- Ticheler J. H. 1961. Ėtude analytique de l’ epidemiologie du scolyte des graines de café Stephanoderis hampei Ferr., en Côte d’ Ivore. Medde. Landb. 61: 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Toledo A. A. 1942. Notas sobre a biologia da vespa de Uganda, Prorops nasuta Waterson, (Hymenopera: Bethylidae) no estado de S. Paulo–Brasil. Arqu. Inst. Biol. 13: 233–260. [Google Scholar]
- Vijayalakshmi C. K., Simi C., Tintumol K., and Vinodkumar P. K.. 2014. Life cycle of the coffee berry borer parasitoid, Cephanolomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) on parchment and cherry coffee. Int. J. of Sci. Tech. Research. 3: 151–152. [Google Scholar]



