Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2018 Feb 28;9(3):328. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0025-4

Mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) and lysosomal storage diseases

Ida Annunziata 1, Renata Sano 2, Alessandra d’Azzo 1,
PMCID: PMC5832421  PMID: 29491402

Abstract

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) comprise a large group of disorders of catabolism, mostly due to deficiency of a single glycan-cleaving hydrolase. The consequent endo-lysosomal accumulation of undigested or partially digested substrates in cells of virtually all organs, including the nervous system, is diagnostic of these diseases and underlies pathogenesis. A subgroup of LSDs, the glycosphingolipidoses, are caused by deficiency of glycosidases that process/degrade sphingolipids and glycosphingolipids (GSLs). GSLs are among the lipid constituents of mammalian membranes, where they orderly distribute and, together with a plethora of membrane proteins, contribute to the formation of discrete membrane microdomains or lipid rafts. The composition of intracellular membranes enclosing organelles reflects that at the plasma membrane (PM). Organelles have the tendencies to tether to one another and to the PM at specific membrane contact sites that, owing to their lipid and protein content, resemble PM lipid rafts. The focus of this review is on the MAMs, mitochondria associated ER membranes, sites of juxtaposition between ER and mitochondria that function as biological hubs for the exchange of molecules and ions, and control the functional status of the reciprocal organelles. We will focus on the lipid components of the MAMs, and highlight how failure to digest or process the sialylated GSL, GM1 ganglioside, in lysosomes alters the lipid conformation and functional properties of the MAMs and leads to neuronal cell death and neurodegeneration.

Facts

  • MAMs are discrete tethering sites between the ER and mitochondria membranes with a defined composition of lipids and proteins that resembles the PM lipid rafts.

  • MAMs serve as functional hubs for many physiological processes that are influenced by the specific distribution and local concentration of the lipid components (i.e. cholesterol and gangliosides)

  • Lipid contents limit the recruitment and clustering of specific proteins at the MAMs, and influence their biochemical properties and functions.

  • Impaired lysosomal turnover and degradation of GM1 in the LSD GM1-gangliosidosis alter the molecular composition of the MAMs and Ca2+ signaling, resulting in ER-mitochondria-mediated neuronal apoptosis.

Open questions

  • Are there other genetic defects of lysosomal catabolism that influence the function and structural characteristics of the MAMs?

  • Does deregulation of signaling pathways at the MAMs, caused by their altered lipid composition, underlie aspects of pathophysiology of lipid storage diseases, especially with regard to neurodegeneration?

  • Are there differences in the lipid and protein makeup of the MAMs depending on the cell types or physiological state of the cells?

  • How can we monitor and assess lipid redistribution to the MAMs?

Lysosomes and lysosomal storage diseases

The lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome systems converge the bulk of cellular catabolism in virtually all mammalian cells13. The dynamic interplay between these catabolic machineries counterbalances the metabolic needs of cells and ensures the homeostatic maintenance of cell physiology. Lysosomes are delegated to the compartmentalized processing/degradation/recycling of long-lived macromolecules that reach the organelles through the biosynthetic, endocytic, phagocytic or autophagic routes3. In addition, lysosomes have recently emerged as central platforms for specialized cellular functions, such as nutrient sensing, Ca2+ signaling, PM repair, cholesterol trafficking, viral/bacterial infections and cell death27. The constituents of these organelles include soluble and membrane-bound hydrolytic enzymes, lysosomal integral membrane proteins, ion channels and transporters, whose expression is regulated in turn by transcriptional and post-translational modifications that adapt their activities and functions to the cell types and the metabolic status of the cells3, 8. Activation of the lysosomal system may occur under both physiologic and pathologic stimuli; the result is multiform, and displays the involvement of lysosomes in such fundamental processes as metabolic regulation, nutrition, differentiation and cell defense3,810. A failure of the lysosomal system to perform its functions results in severe clinical conditions known as LSDs9,1113.

The majority of LSDs are caused by deficient or defective activity of glycosidases. The natural substrates of these enzymes comprise a wide array of glycoconjugates, many of which are still unidentified, that are themselves differentially expressed and distributed in different cell types. Genetic mutations that impair their hydrolytic capacity provoke a cascade of pathologic events that are mostly triggered by the relentless accumulation of partially unprocessed/degraded substrates in these organelles, leading to the characteristic appearance of swollen lysosomes, the hallmark of these diseases. The heterogeneous composition of lysosomes and their ubiquitous distribution account for the systemic clinical manifestations of LSDs14.

With a combined incidence of 1:5000 live births, this group of over 70, individually rare, monogenic disorders affect multiple organs, including the nervous system2,11. While the genetic bases of the LSDs are relatively easy to define, the age of onset and complexity of the symptoms may depend on the type of LSD, the amount of residual enzymatic activity, the biochemical properties of the storage material, and the cell types where the storage mostly occurs1214. Clinical signs may include coarse face, myoclonus, macular cherry red spot, hepatosplenomegaly, cardiac and kidney involvement and dysostosis multiplex. In addition, more than 70% of LSDs display an array of neurological abnormalities, associated with severe developmental delay, and psychiatric problems. The complexity of the phenotypes has rendered the understanding of the pathogenesis particularly challenging but also created a means for dissecting the biology of the lysosomal system and more broadly for deciphering the molecular effectors downstream of a single enzyme deficiency and accumulated metabolites.

A subgroup of LSDs linked to defective catabolism of lipids comprises the glycosphingolipidoses, NPC, and Wolman disease1518. Sphingolipids and their glycosylated and sialylated derivatives, the GSLs and gangliosides, are ubiquitous and abundant components of cellular membranes in mammalian cells. Their amphipathic structure includes a basic hydrophobic membrane moiety, ceramide, composed of sphingosine and fatty acid, and a hydrophilic oligosaccharide chain that may contain one or more sialic acid residues19,20. They are synthesized in the ER, Golgi and trans Golgi network by the sequential addition of carbohydrate residues to their backbone ceramide; they are then transferred via vesicular and non-vesicular mechanisms to the outer leaflet of the PM21. Degradation of these compounds occurs along the endocytic route by the stepwise removal of individual sugars by lysosomal exoglycosidases or membrane sialidases working in concert with activator proteins22.

Membrane microdomains: MAMs and their lipid raft-like characteristics

Mammalian membranes represent highly dynamic structures that maintain cell integrity and govern a myriad of cellular processes indispensable for the proper physiology of cells and tissues. PM and intracellular membranes are organized in discrete subdomains/microdomains, sharing features of lipid rafts, that are enriched in GSLs, cholesterol and ceramide. These microdomains are also known as DRMs or GEMs2325. The type of lipids in these membrane microdomains limits the recruitment and clustering of specific protein components, creating functional cellular hubs for efficient (lipid) shuttling, trafficking of ions and signaling molecules26.

It is now well established that all intracellular organelles are in a state of constant communication achieved at MCS2731. These membrane structures create a transitory but efficient way of transferring or exchanging lipids and other macromolecules between organellar membranes. MCS are established by the tethering of membrane protein complexes and lipids, which maintain the two organelles in close proximity without undergoing fusion. Considering the widespread ER network within cells, the membranes of the ER cisternae can engage in multiple contact sites with other organellar membranes, including those of the mitochondria, the lysosomes, the Golgi apparatus, the endosomes and the PM (Fig. 1)29,30,32,33. These membrane microdomains are not randomly assembled but are specified by the characteristics and arrangement of the protein and lipid components they embed at either tethering membranes. This configuration allows for the compartmentalization of specific functions/activities in a controlled milieu, and explains why MCS between intracellular organelles have raft-like characteristics (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Membrane contact sites in Eukaryotes.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of an eukaryotic cell and its interorganellar membrane contact sites. The vast network of the ER participates in multiple membrane contact sites with the membranes of mitochondria (MITO.), PM, early endosome (EE), lysosome (L) and Golgi. Additionally, lysosomes can tether with mitochondrial and nuclear (Nu.) membranes. EL endolysosomes; AV autophagyc vacuoles; EnV endocytic vesicles; ExoV exocytic vesicles

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic rendering of the contact sites between ER and mitochondria (MAMs), ER and PM (PAMs) and potentially ER and lysosomes (?) that explain the redistribution and buildup of GM1 in the ER membranes and the consequent activation of the apoptotic process leading to neuronal cell death in β-gal−/− mice

So far, the best studied of these contact sites are the one formed between the membranes of the ER and the mitochondria3348. These membrane microdomains, known as mitochondria associated ER-membranes or MAMs, are now established as reversible tethers that co-regulate and influence a variety of cellular processes, i.e., synthesis/transport of lipids and lipid intermediates, Ca2+ dynamics/signaling, autophagy, mitochondrial shape and size, apoptosis and energy metabolism35,4654. These functions of the MAMs are tightly interconnected, given that changes in the topology and concentration of their constituents can dramatically alter their homeostatic control of specific ER and mitochondrial functions with pathological effects that can lead to cell demise.

To date, there is still little understanding of the way the turnover of membrane lipids, particularly GSLs and cholesterol, by lysosomal hydrolases can modulate the local concentration of these constituents at the MAMs and, in turn, their function. However, the prediction is that defective lysosomal catabolism of lipids, causing the buildup of these compounds at the PM and in lysosomes, may provoke their redistribution to the limiting membranes of other organelles and eventually alter the lipid composites of MCS. In this review, we will give a specific example of how impaired degradation of the sialylated GSL, GM1, due to deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme β-Gal (Table 1) in the neurodegenerative LSD GM1-gangliosidosis, provokes the redistribution of this ganglioside to the ER membranes, which, in turn, changes its local concentration within MAMs and alters MAM’s functions (Fig. 2).

Table 1.

List of proteins cited in this review, with their localization, function, and main interactors

Protein Localization Function Known interactors References
β-galactosidase Lysosome Catalyzes the hydrolysis of a terminal β-linked galactose residue from ganglioside substrates and other glycoconjugates Protective protein cathepsi A (PPCA), neuraminidase 1 (NEU1) 126, 127
Cathepsin D Lysosome Aspartic-type endopeptidase activity 80
Palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1, PPT1 Lysosome Removes thioester-linked fatty acyl groups such as palmitate from cysteine residues CLN5 80
Tripeptidyl peptidase 1, TPP1 Lysososome Cleaves N-terminal tripeptides from substrates, and has weaker endopeptidase activity CLN5 80
PSS1 ER face of the MAMs Phosphatidylserine synthase 1 128
PSS2 ER face of the MAMs Phosphatidylserine synthase 2 128
PS- decarboxylase Mitochondrial side of the MAMs Phosphatidylserine- decarboxylase 59
PE-methyltransferase, PEMT MAMs Phosphatidylethanolamine-methyltransferase 62
Mdm10 Mitochondria/MAMs ERMES complex Mdm34, Mmm1, Mdm12, Gem1 45, 71
Mdm34 Mitochondria/MAMs ERMES complex Mdm10, Mmm1, Mdm12, Gem1 45, 73
Mmm1 ER/MAMs ERMES complex Mdm34, Mmm10, Mdm12, Gem1 45, 72
Mdm12 Cytosol/MAMs ERMES complex Mdm34, Mmm10, Mdm1, Gem1 45, 73
Lam6 MAMs, vacuole-mitochondria patches, nuclear-vacuole contact sites ERMES complex, vCLAMP (vacuole and mitochondria patch), and NVJ (nuclear vacuolar junction) Mdm10, Mmm1, Mdm12, Mdm34, Vps39, Nvj1, Vac8 74, 75
Gem1 MAMs ERMES complex Mdm10, Mmm1, Mdm12, Mdm34 70, 72
EMC1 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
EMC2 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
EMC3 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
EMC4 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
EMC5 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
EMC6 MAMs EMC, PS transfer, MAMs architecture TOM5 78
CLN8 ER integral membrane protein Transmembrane protein belonging to a family of proteins containing TLC domains, which are postulated to function in lipid synthesis, transport, or sensing. CLN5 80
Caspase 12 ER Member of the cysteine-aspartic acid protease family responsible for ER-stress-induced apoptosis 102, 129
PC- cytidyltransferase, CTP Cytosol, MAMs Involved in the regulation of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis 86
Acetyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase, ACAT MAMs Catalyzes the reversible formation of acetoacetyl-CoA from two molecules of acetyl-CoA 35, 90
Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, StaR MAMs, mitochondria Plays a key role in the acute regulation of steroid hormone synthesis by enhancing the conversion of cholesterol into pregnenolone TOMM22, VDAC2 97
Sigma-1 receptor ER face of the MAMs Interacts with a variety of psychotomimetic drugs, including cocaine and amphetamines. The receptor is believed to play an important role in the cellular functions of various tissues associated with the endocrine, immune, and nervous systems. BiP, IP3R3 100
VDAC-1 Mitochondrial side of the MAMs Facilitates the exchange of metabolites and ions across the outer mitochondrial membrane Grp75 130
IP3R-1 ER, MAMs Mediates calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum following stimulation by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate GRP75 52, 130, 131
GRP75 ER, mitochondria, MAMs Member of the heat shock protein 70 gene family, functions as scaffold between IP3R-1 and VDAC1 IP3R-1 and VDAC1 52, 130
BiP ER, MAMs Involved in the folding and assembly of proteins in the ER Interacts with many ER proteins 108, 132
Calnexin ER, MAMs Ca2+-binding protein that interacts transiently with newly synthesized N-linked glycoproteins, facilitating protein folding and assembly PACS2, AMBRA1, WIPI1 116, 133
hFis1 Mitochondria Promotes mitochondrial fission t-Bid, Bax,, VDAC1 134, 135
t-Bid Mitochondria Member of the BCL-2 family of cell death regulators Eterodimerizes with either agonist BAX or antagonist BCL2, VDAC1 134, 136
Bax Mitochondria Member of the BCL-2 family of cell death regulators BCL2 family members form hetero- or homodimers and act as anti- or pro-apoptotic regulators 134, 137
LC3 Autophagic vacuoles LC3 (encoded by MAPLC3A and MAPLC3B) is the homolog of the yeast ATG8, an important marker and effector of autophagy Microtubules, FYCO1, TP53INP1 and TP53INP2, TBC1D25, SQSTM1, ATG4B, MAPK15 and BNIP3, MAPB1, KEAP1, PCM1, OFD1, CEP131, TECPR2,TBC1D5, UBQLN1, UBQLN2, UBQLN4, UBQLN1, ATG13, FAM134A, FAM134B, FAM134C 140152
AMBRA1 Autophagic vacuoles Regulates autophagy and development of the nervous system BECN1, BECN2, BCL2, dynein light chains 1 and 2, WIPI1, calnexin 116, 151, 152
WIPI1 Autophagic vacuoles Plays an important role in autophagy and in particular starvation- and calcium-mediated autophagy Interacts with androgen receptor (AR) and the estrogen receptors ESR1, and ESR2, calnexin 116, 153
CHOP Nucleus CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein 102
JNK2 Cytosol JNKs (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) are a group of mitogen-activated protein kinases activated by various environmental stresses 102, 154

Lipid synthesis at the MAMs

Phospholipids

Since the discovery of the MAMs and the identification of their role in maintaining intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis35,36,47,49,52,55, a large body of experimental work has implicated these specific microdomains in both physiological and pathological processes. One of the fundamental functions of the MAMs is the coordinated biosynthesis of phospholipids and their transport35. This is because, beside the ER, other intracellular organelles, including the mitochondria, lack the ability to synthesize de novo their phospholipids and rely on the ER as their only source56. On these premises, the close proximity of the ER and the mitochondria at the MAMs (~10–30 nm) provides an insulated environment against the hydrophilicity of the cytosol, and favors the bi-directional, non-vesicular lipid transfer at these microdomains57. This exchange in trans is evidenced in the metabolism of PS and PC, that has been shown to occur in part at the MAMs35,58. In mammalian cells two PS synthases, PSS1 and PSS2 (Table 1), are present at high concentrations in the MAMs, where they produce PS by base-exchange of the head groups of PC or PE with serine in a Ca2+ dependent manner58. These reactions promote the release of Ca2+ into the ER, an ATP dependent process35,58. PSS1 and PSS2 localize at the ER face of the MAMs, opposite to the PS-decarboxylase (Table 1), which is located at the mitochondrial side59. Their strategic position creates a gradient of PS concentration that facilitates the transfer of PS from the MAMs to the mitochondrial inner membrane. The latter is a rate-limiting step for PS conversion into PE by the decarboxylase. Alternatively, PE is generated by acylation of lyso-PE, a reaction that also occurs in the MAMs6062. Within these contact sites PE can then undergo conversion into PC by three consecutive methylation reactions catalyzed by the methyltransferase PEMT (Table 1), also localized at the MAMs62,63. This set of enzymatic reactions ensures the controlled supply of phospholipids to the mitochondria, which is necessary for maintaining mitochondrial membrane integrity, especially following fusion and fission of the organelles6466. Notably, the ablation of either PSS1 or PSS2, but not both enzymes, in mice is compatible with life, despite the reduction of serine exchange activity and overall tissue reduction of PS67; instead, silencing of PS-decarboxylase reduces mitochondrial PE content, and results in mitochondrial dysfunction and lethality in embryos68.

The active transfer of phospholipids by multiprotein complexes has also been shown to occur at the MAMs, although so far only in the budding yeast and not in mammalian cells. In yeast, genetic screenings have identified macromolecular protein complexes that tether the ER and mitochondrial membranes at contact sites, and possibly coordinate the trafficking of phospholipids and phospholipid intermediates between the two organelles. One of these complexes, named ERMES45,65,69, (Table 1) was found by screening for yeast mutants that failed to grow unless they expressed a synthetic fusion protein that artificially created contact sites between the two organellar membranes. ERMES comprises the two mitochondrial outer membrane proteins Mdm10 and Mdm34, the integral ER membrane protein Mmm1 and the cytosolic protein Mdm1245,7073. In addition, Gem1, the yeast ortholog of the mitochondrial Rho GTPases 1 and 2, Miro1 and Miro270, and more recently Lam674,75 (Table 1), have been shown to be part of and to regulate the ERMES complex. It is noteworthy that Lam6 contains a START domain (see below) and has the ability to bind and transfer sterol across intracellular contact sites76; hence, Lam6 may exert a similar task within the ERMES complex. However, while the role of this complex in tethering ER and mitochondria has been demonstrated, its function in phospholipid transport remains controversial because of apparently contradictory results reported in the literature. In one study, ERMES was shown to mediate lipid exchange between ER and mitochondria45, while in another study the transport of PS between these organelles was shown to be ERMES- and Gem1-independent77. These authors argued that the altered lipid profiles of cells lacking ERMES45 were caused by defects in mitochondrial morphology, rather than in phospholipid metabolism77. Furthermore, all components of the ERMES complex, with the exception of Gem1 and Lam6, lack obvious homologs in higher eukaryotes; for this reason it is still under debate whether an ERMES-like complex exists in mammalian cells70.

Recently, an array-based genetic interaction screen, aimed to discover genes required for phospholipid exchange at the MAMs78, revealed that yeast mutants missing multiple proteins of another complex, EMC (Table 1), had defects in PS transfer to mitochondria, reduced number of contact sites and compromised mitochondrial function. The EMC complex contains six conserved proteins, EMC1–6, and interacts with TOM578. This large multiprotein complex represents another tethering structure between ER and mitochondrial membranes that transfers phospholipids independently of ERMES78. However, while Lam6 and the EMC proteins do have metazoan orthologs, it is still unclear whether these orthologs effectively function as regulators of ER-mitochondria contact sites in mammalian cells, and whether they facilitate lipid shuttling. In addition, we cannot exclude that physical flipping of the lipids may occur between the juxtaposed membranes if they are in sufficiently close proximity.

Defective phospholipid synthesis in the MAMs of Cln8 deficient mice

Interestingly, already two decades ago Vance et al79. examined the role of the MAMs in the metabolism of phospholipids, particularly PS, using the mouse model of the motor neuron disorder, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis or NCL. NCLs, also referred to as CLNs80, are a group of at least 14 congenital neurodegenerative disorders with onset in infancy, adolescence, or young adulthood, depending on the gene involved and the severity of the clinical symptoms81. These diseases are characterized by progressive psychomotor deterioration, epilepsy, and blindness81. Their histopathology hallmark is the accumulation in neurons and other cell types of the autofluorescent lipopigment, lipofuscin82. NCLs are caused by mutations in different genes, encoding soluble lysosomal enzymes (i.e., cathepsin D, PPT1, TPP1) or (non-lysosomal) integral membrane proteins (Table 1)80. One example of the latter group is CLN8, a transmembrane protein that is localized in the ER membranes or shuttles between the ER and Golgi compartments, and is thought to take part in lipid synthesis and transport83. Deficiency of CLN8 is linked to one of the late infantile variants of NCLs, and is associated with increase in glycerophospholipids containing polyunsaturated fatty acyl chains, such as PS and PE, and reduced concentrations of ceramide, galactosyl- and lactosylceramide, sulfatides and fatty acyl chain-containing molecular species84. A homozygous mutation in the orthologous mouse gene (Cln8) was identified in a naturally occurring NCL model, the motor neuron degeneration (mnd) mouse85. Using MAMs isolated from the liver of these animals, Vance et al79. demonstrated that the levels and activity of PEMT2 and other two key enzymes for the synthesis of phospholipids (CTP and PS synthase)86(Table 1) were greatly reduced. Although these reduced activities did not hamper the import of phospholipids into the mitochondria nor the PS metabolism, other proteins normally present in mitochondria partially redistributed to microsomes, suggesting intrinsic defects of the MAMs in the mutant mice79. Nearly 10 years later, by analyzing the neurodegenerative events occurring in specific brain regions of the same mouse model at different stages of disease progression, two groups of investigators reported variable activation of effectors of ER-stress-mediated apoptosis and inflammation87, as well as defective mitochondria buffering capacities of neurons88. Together these studies support the idea that deregulated activity/function of the MAMs relative to lipid synthesis and transport could be a major contributor of neurodegeneration and disease progression in CNL8 deficiency.

Cholesterol and ceramide

Other essential lipids at the mitochondrial membranes are cholesterol and ceramide (Fig. 2). As it is the case for the phospholipids, cholesterol and ceramide are imported into the mitochondria where they serve as structural components of the membranes or as precursors for the synthesis of steroid hormones89. These lipids are produced at least in part in the MAMs, and this accounts for the activities of the cholesterol synthetic enzymes and ceramide synthase being higher in the MAMs than in the ER or mitochondria, respectively57,64.

Basal storage of cholesterol in the form of cholesteryl esters is maintained predominantly through the activity of ACAT (Table 1)90. This enzyme catalyzes the esterification of insoluble, membrane-bound cholesterol into cholesteryl ester, which is subsequently incorporated into lipid droplets, thereby preventing the buildup of toxic cholesterol at the membranes. ACAT and its enzymatic activity are enriched in MAMs, and in fact, this enzyme has been used as a reliable marker of these microdomains35. Under stress or other pathological conditions, the flux of cholesterol may change dramatically due to either augmented hydrolysis of stored cholesteryl esters, increased uptake of plasma cholesterol, or transport of free cholesterol into the mitochondria. The ensuing accumulation of cholesterol within the MAMs is at the basis of severe disease conditions including Alzheimer’s disease, steatohepatitis, and cancer9194, each of whom have been linked to altered signaling pathways occurring at the MAMs.

Similarly, changes in ceramide levels in the MAMs may occur under pathological stimuli. For instance, upon radiation both ceramide synthesis and ceramide levels increase exclusively in the MAMs, but not in the ER and the mitochondria95, albeit the implications of this phenomenon are unknown. We can postulate, however, that the increased pool of ceramide in the MAMs creates a reservoir of this lipid, which can be readily transferred into the mitochondria for the initiation of an apoptotic process, if the pathogenic insult persists. Together these observations suggest that enrichment of lipid synthetic enzymes at the MAMs may serve the purpose of compartmentalizing the transfer of lipid pools into the mitochondria, thereby limiting the toxic effects of lipid overload in this organelle.

Cholesterol is not only synthesized in the MAMs, but also uses these microdomains for its transport into the mitochondria96. This process occurs under acute stress condition or when there is the need for increased cholesterol transfer into the mitochondria, for instance during the synthesis of steroid hormones. The latter process is catalyzed by the sequential action of a set of steroidogenic enzymes, one of which, StAR (Table 1), is rate limiting for the subsequent biosynthetic reactions96. As mentioned earlier, StAR contains a START domain that is required for the binding to and transport of cholesterol. The mode of activation of this enzyme is unusual because the 37 kDa StAR precursor is first translocated into the MAMs, where it binds cholesterol and interacts with VDAC2, a prerequisite for its processing into a 32 kDa intermediate97. This form is then imported into the mitochondrial matrix as a fully active 30 kDa cholesterol-bound protein by a complex formed by TOMM22 and VDAC2 (Table 1)97. VDAC2 appears to be a key player in this process, because, in its absence, the amount of mitochondrial StAR is reduced and the protein cannot be efficiently loaded onto the MAMs. Consequently, a reduced amount of cholesterol is imported into the mitochondria, which eventually affects the synthesis of steroids. Also in this example, the MAMs act as functional hubs for the pathways of cholesterol transport and steroidogenesis97.

The actual lipid composition of the MAMs has gained special attention in recent years52,98,99. Several studies have revealed that specific types of lipids are embedded and concentrate in these microdomains, rendering the composition of the tethering membranes topologically different from that of the reciprocal ER and mitochondrial membranes. The gathering of lipids at the MAMs, and the modulation of their local concentration, change the structure of these contact sites and their ability to recruit specialized protein assemblies, ultimately altering the MAMs’ physiological functions and activities. For example, sigma-1 receptor, a structural component of the MAMs100 that participates in Ca2+ signaling, associates within the raft/GEM fraction of the MAMs with ceramide and cholesterol98,99. The high levels of cholesterol within the MAMs, which is 5–7 times higher than that in the ER, and the accumulation of ceramide at the same sites have been shown to cause partitioning of sigma-1 receptor to the raft/GEM subdomain of the MAMs98. Instead, depletion of either lipid from the MAMs relocates the sigma-1 receptor from the MAMs to the ER membrane, likely altering Ca2+ signaling99. It was also demonstrated that reducing cholesterol concentration within the MAMs with MBCD, a circular oligosaccharide used to extract cholesterol from membranes98, significantly increases MAMs copurification with mitochondria, suggesting that cholesterol may also act as a negative regulator of MAMs formation.

Sialylated glysoshingolipids: gangliosides

Other quantitatively minor, but important lipids for the function of the MAMs, are the gangliosides, the major class of acidic GSLs, containing one or more sialic acid residues. Gangliosides are structural components of the outer leaflet of PM and the nuclear envelop, where they segregate, together with cholesterol and other sphingolipids, into raft microdomains102104. They are particularly abundant in the nervous system, where they account for approximately 10–12% of the total lipid contents of neuronal membranes102104, whereas they occur at relatively low levels in other tissues. Their diversity and structural complexity suggest that gangliosides are not biologically redundant, but have unique functions. Beside exhibiting receptor or co-receptor function for cytokines, toxins, viruses and bacteria19,105107, gangliosides are key signaling molecules that take part in biological processes as pivotal as cellular recognition and adhesion, receptor signal transduction, Ca2+ signaling, growth regulation, and differentiation101,103,107. Gangliosides are also important messengers of the adaptive responses to stress, including apoptosis. Under stress conditions that cause an increase of their intracellular concentration, gangliosides can tilt the homeostatic balance towards the induction of an apoptotic program (Fig. 3)52,108. In addition to their role at the PM, there is now experimental evidence that gangliosides can reside at the MAMs, where their effect on often opposite cell fate decisions again depends on their local concentration, structural characteristics and sugar modifications. However, it is not yet clear whether gangliosides directly perturb membrane composition and permeability, or they influence the recruitment/function of membrane proteins.

Fig. 3. Schematic representation of a single MAM, depicted as a functional hub for the aberrant transfer of Ca2+ between ER and mitochondria, leading to ER- and mitochondria- mediated neuronal cell death in GM1-gangliosidosis.

Fig. 3

The figure also lists the principal effectors of the apoptotic process described in Tessitore et al., 2004108 and Sano et al., 200952

MAM’s localized GD3 and autophagy

The disialogaglioside GD3 has been first described as a tumor associated antigen, because it was found overexpressed in multiple tumors109,110. Since those early studies, GD3 has been shown to induce mitochondrial apoptosis in several cell types, including human hematopoietic cells, epithelial cells and neural cells111,112. GD3 appears to exert this function when localized in the raft/GEM microdomains of the mitochondrial membrane (Figs. 2 and 3), where it associates with VDAC1 and the fission protein hFis1 to form a structural complex that recruits two of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, t-Bid and Bax (Table 1). Once formed, this multimolecular complex triggers mitochondria depolarization and apoptosis. In support of these findings is the observation that disruption of lipid microdomains in isolated mitochondria by MBCD rescues the mitochondria depolarization induced by GD3113.

Besides its role in apoptosis, recently GD3 has also been implicated in the formation of autophagosomes, because it was shown to physically interact with MAP1LC3/LC3 (Table 1)114,115. In a follow-up study, the same group has demonstrated that specifically in the raft/GEM fraction of the MAMs, GD3 is associated with two important effectors of autophagosome’s formation, AMBRA1 and WIPI1 (Table 1)116. These authors further showed that under starvation-induced autophagy the concentration of GD3 increases within the microdomains, which favors the interaction of this ganglioside with the chaperon calnexin, another resident protein of the MAMs that interacts with AMBRA1 and WIPI1. Thus, following autophagic induction, an increased amount of GD3 clusters together with AMBRA1, WIPI1 and calnexin in the lipid-enriched fraction of the MAMs; these results point to an active role for this ganglioside in the early phases of the autophagic process, specifically at these membrane microdomains. In contrast, reducing the levels of GD3 by inhibition of ganglioside synthesis hinders the initiation of autophagy116. Thus, as it is the case for other lipids, modulation of the gangliosides’ concentration in the MAMs greatly influences the coordinated regulation of autophagy116.

GM1-gangliosidosis: GM1 at the MAMs and neurodegeneration

Another sialylated GSL identified as a structural component of the MAMs, albeit present at very low concentration under physiological conditions, is GM1. GM1 is one of the most abundant gangliosides present in the adult neuronal membranes, and is the only ganglioside shown to bind Ca2+ and to modulate Ca2+ flux across membranes (Figs. 2 and 3)52,102,108,117,118.

Accumulation of GM1 above its physiological threshold occurs in GM1-gangliosidosis, a generalized, neurodegenerative LSD caused by deficiency of the GM1-cleaving enzyme β–Gal119. This very severe condition affects primarily infants, but milder cases, with a longer survival, occur in adolescents and adults119. The early onset form of GM1-gangliosidosis presents with growth retardation, progressive neurologic deterioration, due to extensive brain atrophy, visceromegaly, and skeletal dysplasia. Abnormal amounts of GM1 and, to a lesser extent its asialo-derivative GA1, accumulate in the brain, and oligosaccharides derived from glycoproteins and keratan sulfate are excreted in the urine. Beta-Gal–/– mice, an authentic model of GM1-gangliosidosis120, develop a severe, generalized nervous system disease, resulting in tremors, ataxia and abnormal gait, which culminates with rigidity and paralysis of the hind limbs120.

Neurons, the primary affected cells of the disease, undergo massive, age-dependent accumulation of both GM1 and GA1120. This phenotype is accompanied by profound histopathological changes throughout the CNS, associated with progressive expansion of the lysosomal compartment as the animals age (Fig. 4). Degenerating neurons filled with lysosomes containing membranous material and remnants of the ER and ribosomes are emblematic of the disease (Fig. 4). Neuronal cell death is followed by micro- and astrogliosis, a sign of an elicited widespread CNS inflammation121123. In β-Gal–/– mice impaired lysosomal degradation of GM1 in neurons is accompanied by the abnormal redistribution of this ganglioside from the PM and lysosomes to the ER membranes (Fig. 2). Studies seeking for a pathogenic mechanism that would link the neuronal cell death to the primary storage product, revealed that the abnormal GM1 levels at the ER membranes led to depletion of the ER Ca2+ store, followed by activation of an UPR123. Initially elicited as survival mechanism via upregulation of ER-resident chaperones and folding catalysts, such as BiP (Table 1), and inhibition of protein synthesis124, prolonged UPR activation under a persistent pathologic stimulus causes permanent damage and triggers an ER stress-mediated apoptotic program125. In β-Gal−/− brain and spinal cord, upregulation and activation of the UPR molecular effectors responsible for cell survival (e.g., BiP) is associated with increased levels of the transcription factor ATF6, the proapoptotic mediator CHOP, the phosphorylated form of the kinase JNK2, and the cleaved, active form of caspase-12, and culminates with apoptosis (Fig. 3 and Table 1)108. Activation of the UPR appeared to be directly downstream of GM1 accumulation in the ER membranes, because reducing the levels of de novo synthesized GM1 reverted UPR activation108.

Fig. 4. Ultrastructural abnormalities in the CNS of β-Gal−/− mice.

Fig. 4

Transmission electron microscopy of spinal cord neurons from 3-month-old β-Gal−/− and β-Gal+/+ mice shows evidence in the affected mouse of an expanded lysosomal compartment with enlarged lysosomes filled with membranous material due to accumulation of GM1-ganglioside. Scale bars: 1 μm; lover right panel 0.5 μm. Adapted from the original article Tessitore et al., 2004108 with the permission of Elsevier

The intrinsic ability of GM1 to bind Ca2+ and its redistribution in the ER membranes suggested that this ganglioside could reside also in the MAMs. At this location, GM1 accumulation could perturb the topology of the microdomains and their Ca2+ buffering capacity. Transmission electron microscopy analyses of crude mitochondria isolated from β-Gal–/– mouse brains indeed identified an increased number of ER remnants juxtaposed to mitochondrial membranes, compared to those from the WT samples (Fig. 5). This indicated that GM1 accumulation in the ER membranes fostered the formation of more contact sites between ER and mitochondria. Moreover, MAMs isolated from β-Gal–/– brains36,52 contained substantially higher levels of GM1 than WT MAMs52, and the amount was even greater in the purified raft/GEM fractions of the MAMs (Fig. 5). These findings unequivocally proved that GM1 is a normal constituent of these lipid microdomains, albeit present in minuscule amounts, and accumulates in these microdomains from β-Gal–/– MAMs. These studies have established the existence of rafts/GEMs microdomains within the MAMs and demonstrated that under disease conditions the increased concentration of GM1 at the GEMs facilitates the formation and constitutive activation of a Ca2+ pore composed of the IP3R1, VDAC1 and GRP75 (Figs. 2 and 5; Table 1)52. Remarkably, the observation that the phosphorylated and active form of the IP3R1 (P-IP3R1) is enriched in the β-Gal–/– GEMs, and co-precipitates with GM1 (Fig. 5) suggests that GM1 accumulation alters the dynamics of the lipid microenvironment, and favors the partitioning of IP3R1 in an active conformation into these microdomains. Concomitantly, the high levels of VDAC1 and GRP75 observed in the β-Gal–/– GEMs (Fig. 5), further potentiates the activity of the Ca2+ megachannel composed by these proteins. These pathological changes in the composition of the β-Gal–/– MAMs promotes the continuous Ca2+ flux into the mitochondria, which ultimately leads to mitochondria Ca2+ overload (Figs. 2 and 3). The net result of these events affects the bioenergetic activities of the mitochondria, and activates the mitochondrial intrinsic apoptotic pathway (Fig. 3)52. Signs of mitochondrial dysfunction include mitochondria depolarization, opening of the PTP and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, which together contribute to mitochondria-mediated apoptosis downstream of GM1 accumulation in the MAMs/GEMs (Fig. 3). Treatment of β-Gal−/− cells with MBCD, that efficiently extracts GM1 from the MAMs, rescues the opening of the PTP, the dissipation of the potential, and the apoptotic process (Fig. 6). Taken together these studies underscore the significance of the MAMs/GEMs microdomains in preserving physiological ER homeostasis and mitochondrial bioenergetics activity.

Fig. 5. GM1 accumulation in the GEMs alters MAMs dynamics.

Fig. 5

a Representative electron micrographs of mitochondria isolated from β-Gal+/+ and β-Gal−/− brains showed larger areas of juxtaposition between ER and mitochondria in the β-Gal−/− preparations compared to the WT. b TLC analysis of lipids from the purified MAMs, and the Triton-extracted (Triton extr. MAMs) and Triton-insoluble fractions (GEMs) of the MAMs demonstrated the buildup of GM1 in all β-Gal−/− fractions. c Increased levels of phosphorylated IP3R1, VDAC1, and GRP75 were detected in the GEMs extracted from β-Gal−/− brains compared to β-Gal+/+ brains. Adapted from the original article Sano et al., 200952 with the permission of Elsevier

Fig. 6. Schematic rendering of the effects of MBCD on MAMs/GEMs in GM1-accumulating cells.

Fig. 6

MBCD efficiently extracts GM1 from these microdomains and, in turn, reverts mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and apoptosis

Conclusions and perspectives

In eukaryotic cells membrane-enclosed organelles, albeit individually entrusted to different functions, are highly dynamic and in constant communication with one another (Fig. 1). Their regulated interplay occurs at membrane tethering sites embedded in an active cytoskeletal network, whose formation creates the most efficient setting for the cell to respond quickly to certain physiological or pathological cues. The contact sites between the ER and mitochondria or MAMs are a good example of these functional hubs that control fundamental processes of the corresponding organelles by limiting or enhancing the bidirectional transfer of molecules and ions. The fact that the MAMs embed subdomains enriched in cholesterol and GM1, similar to the lipid rafts of the PM, emphasizes the direct involvement of these constituents in the regulated trafficking of molecules and ions between the two organelles, which can tilt the cell fate towards survival or apoptosis. Thus, it is not surprising that changes in the MAM’s lipid composition/concentration in response to pathological conditions, as in GM1-gangliosidosis, lead to cell death. Many fundamental questions on the biology of the MAMs remain unanswered. For instance, it is still a matter of debate whether variations in the lipid and/or protein signature of the MAMs exist in different cell types or in response to physiologic/pathologic stimuli. What is clear is that specific lipid combinations within the MAMs dictate the recruitment and activity of distinct sets of proteins. It will be of great interest to understand if in other LSDs, like NPC, the failed egression of cholesterol from lysosomal membranes and its accumulation in intracellular membranes also affect the raft/GEM subdomain of the MAMs. If this would be the case, we could anticipate that impaired activity of the MAMs could represent a major contributing factor to disease pathogenesis, especially in lipid storage diseases.

Acknowledgements

The authors apologize for omitting some important contributions in this field of research due to space restrains. We thank Ashley Durand and Brandon Stelter of the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Biomedical Communication Department for the graphic figures. A.d’A. holds the Jewelers For Children (JFC) Endowed Chair in Genetics and Gene Therapy. This work was funded by NIH grants GM104981, DK095169, CA021764, The Assisi Foundation of Memphis, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Footnotes

Edited by P. Pinton

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ji CH, Kwon YT. Crosstalk and Interplay between the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Mol. Cell. 2017;40:441–449. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saftig, P. Physiology of the lysosome. In: Mehta, A., Beck, M., Sunder-Plassmann, G. (eds). Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS Oxford PharmaGenesis; Oxford, (2006) Chapter 3. [PubMed]
  • 3.Saftig P, Klumperman J. Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;10:623–635. doi: 10.1038/nrm2745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carette JE, Raaben M, Wong AC, Herbert AS, Obernosterer G, Mulherkar N, et al. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature. 2011;477:340–343. doi: 10.1038/nature10348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ndungo, E., Herbert, A. S., Raaben, M., Obernosterer, G., Biswas, R., Miller, E. H. et al. A single residue in ebola virus receptor npc1 influences cellular host range in reptiles. mSphere1 e00007-16 (2016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Jae LT, Raaben M, Herbert AS, Kuehne AI, Wirchnianski AS, Soh TK, et al. Virus entry. Lassa virus entry requires a trigger-induced receptor switch. Science. 2014;344:1506–1510. doi: 10.1126/science.1252480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fineran P, Lloyd-Evans E, Lack NA, Platt N, Davis LC, Morgan AJ, et al. Pathogenic mycobacteria achieve cellular persistence by inhibiting the Niemann-Pick Type C disease cellular pathway. Wellcome Open Res. 2016;1:18. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10036.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Settembre C, Fraldi A, Medina DL, Ballabio A. Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013;14:283–296. doi: 10.1038/nrm3565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lloyd-Evans E, Haslett LJ. The lysosomal storage disease continuum with ageing-related neurodegenerative disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016;32:104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferguson SM. Beyond indigestion: emerging roles for lysosome-based signaling in human disease. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2015;35:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bellettato CM, Scarpa M. Pathophysiology of neuropathic lysosomal storage disorders. J. Inherit. Metabol. Dis. 2010;33:347–362. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Platt FM, Boland B, van der Spoel AC. The cell biology of disease: lysosomal storage disorders: the cellular impact of lysosomal dysfunction. J. Cell Biol. 2012;199:723–734. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201208152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rigante D, Cipolla C, Basile U, Gulli F, Savastano MC. Overview of immune abnormalities in lysosomal storage disorders. Immunol. Lett. 2017;188:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cox TM, Cachon-Gonzalez MB. The cellular pathology of lysosomal diseases. J. Pathol. 2012;226:241–254. doi: 10.1002/path.3021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Regier DS, Proia RL, D’Azzo A, Tifft CJ. The GM1 and GM2 gangliosidoses: natural history and progress toward therapy. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Rev. 2016;13:663–673. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Raas-Rothschild A, Pankova-Kholmyansky I, Kacher Y, Futerman AH. Glycosphingolipidoses: beyond the enzymatic defect. Glycoconj. J. 2004;21:295–304. doi: 10.1023/B:GLYC.0000046272.38480.ef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vanier, M. T. Niemann-Pick diseases. Handbook of Clin. Neurol.113, 1717–1721 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Burton BK, Deegan PB, Enns GM, Guardamagna O, Horslen S, Hovingh GK, et al. Clinical features of lysosomal acid lipase deficiency. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015;61:619–625. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schnaar RL. Gangliosides of the vertebrate nervous system. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:3325–3336. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hakomori SI. Structure and function of glycosphingolipids and sphingolipids: recollections and future trends. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1780:325–346. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schnaar, R. L., Suzuki, A., Stanley, P. Glycosphingolipids. in Essentials of Glycobiology, 2nd edn (eds Varki, A., Cummings, R. D., Esko, J. D., Freeze, H. H., Stanley, P., Bertozzi, C. R., et al.) (Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2009). [PubMed]
  • 22.Sandhoff K, Kolter T. Biosynthesis and degradation of mammalian glycosphingolipids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003;358:847–861. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sezgin E, Levental I, Mayor S, Eggeling C. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2017;18:361–374. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hooper NM. Detergent-insoluble glycosphingolipid/cholesterol-rich membrane domains, lipid rafts and caveolae (review) Mol. Membr. Biol. 1999;16:145–156. doi: 10.1080/096876899294607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ikonen E. Roles of lipid rafts in membrane transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001;13:470–477. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Helle, S. C., Kanfer, G., Kolar, K., Lang, A., Michel, A. H., Kornmann, B. Organization and function of membrane contact sites. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2526-2541 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Kvam E, Goldfarb DS. Nucleus-vacuole junctions in yeast: anatomy of a membrane contact site. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006;34(Pt. 3):340–342. doi: 10.1042/BST0340340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Levine TP, Patel S. Signalling at membrane contact sites: two membranes come together to handle second messengers. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016;39:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prinz WA. Bridging the gap: membrane contact sites in signaling, metabolism, and organelle dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 2014;205:759–769. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201401126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wong LH, Levine TP. Lipid transfer proteins do their thing anchored at membrane contact sites… but what is their thing? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016;44:517–527. doi: 10.1042/BST20150275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Levine T, Loewen C. Inter-organelle membrane contact sites: through a glass, darkly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006;18:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gatta AT, Levine TP. Piecing together the patchwork of contact sites. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:214–229. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rizzuto RPP, Carrington W, Fay FS, Fogarty KE, Lifshitz LM, Tuft RA, Pozzan T. Close contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum as determinants of mitochondrial Ca2+responses. Science. 1998;280:1763–1766. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vance JE. Phospholipid synthesis in a membrane fraction associated with mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:7248–7256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Annunziata, I., Patterson, A., d’Azzo, A. Mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) and glycosphingolipid enriched microdomains (GEMs): isolation from mouse brain. J. Vis. Exp.73 e50215 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Baumann O, Walz B. Endoplasmic reticulum of animal cells and its organization into structural and functional domains. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2001;205:149–214. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(01)05004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bionda CPJ, Schmitt D, Rodriguez-Lafrasse C, Ardail D. Subcellular compartmentalization of ceramide metabolism: MAM (mitochondria-associated membrane) and/or mitochondria? Biochem. J. 2004;382:527–533. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Copeland DE, Dalton AJ. An association between mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum in cells of the pseudobranch gland of a teleost. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1959;5:393–396. doi: 10.1083/jcb.5.3.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Csordas G, Renken C, Varnai P, Walter L, Weaver D, Buttle KF, et al. Structural and functional features and significance of the physical linkage between ER and mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2006;174:915–921. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Csordas G, Varnai P, Golenar T, Roy S, Purkins G, Schneider TG, et al. Imaging interorganelle contacts and local calcium dynamics at the ER-mitochondrial interface. Mol. Cell. 2010;39:121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.de Brito OM, Scorrano L. Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature. 2008;456:605–610. doi: 10.1038/nature07534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grimm S. The ER-mitochondria interface: the social network of cell death. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1823:327–334. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ishii KHK, Iino M . Ca2+ shuttling between endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria underlying Ca2+ oscillations. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:390–396. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kornmann B, Currie E, Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Nunnari J, Weissman JS, et al. An ER-mitochondria tethering complex revealed by a synthetic biology screen. Science. 2009;325:477–481. doi: 10.1126/science.1175088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu X, Weaver D, Shirihai O, Hajnoczky G. Mitochondrial ‘kiss-and-run’: interplay between mitochondrial motility and fusion-fission dynamics. EMBO J. 2009;28:3074–3089. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Csordas G, Hajnoczky G. SR/ER-mitochondrial local communication: calcium and ROS. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1787:1352–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hayashi T, Rizzuto R, Hajnoczky G, Su TP. MAM: more than just a housekeeper. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rizzuto RBM, Murgia M, Pozzan T . Microdomains with high Ca2+ close to IP3-sensitive channels that are sensed by neighboring mitochondria. Science. 1993;262:744–747. doi: 10.1126/science.8235595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang HJ, Guay G, Pogan L, Sauve R, Nabi IR. Calcium regulates the association between mitochondria and a smooth subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2000;150:1489–1498. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Szabadkai GBK, Varnai P, De Stefani D, Wieckowski MR, Cavagna D, Nagy AI, Balla T, Rizzuto R . Chaperone-mediated coupling of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial Ca2+ channels. J. Cell Biol. 2006;175:901–911. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sano R, Annunziata I, Patterson A, Moshiach S, Gomero E, Opferman J, et al. GM1-ganglioside accumulation at the mitochondria-associated ER membranes links ER stress to Ca(2+)-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis. Mol. Cell. 2009;36:500–511. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Missiroli S, Bonora M, Patergnani S, Poletti F, Perrone M, Gafa R, et al. PML at Mitochondria-Associated Membranes Is Critical for the Repression of Autophagy and CancerDevelopment. Cell Rep. 2016;16:2415–2427. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Theurey P, Rieusset J. Mitochondria-associated membranes response to nutrient availability and role in metabolic diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metabol. 2017;28:32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pinton P, Giorgi C, Siviero R, Zecchini E, Rizzuto R. Calcium and apoptosis: ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer in the control of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27:6407–6418. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Voeltz GK, Rolls MM, Rapoport TA. Structural organization of the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:944–950. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rusinol AE, Cui Z, Chen MH, Vance JE. A unique mitochondria-associated membrane fraction from rat liver has a high capacity for lipid synthesis and contains pre-Golgi secretory proteins including nascent lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:27494–27502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vance JE, Steenbergen R. Metabolism and functions of phosphatidylserine. Prog. Lipid Res. 2005;44:207–234. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2005.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schuiki I, Daum G. Phosphatidylserine decarboxylases, key enzymes of lipid metabolism. IUBMB Life. 2009;61:151–162. doi: 10.1002/iub.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vance JE, Tasseva G. Formation and function of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1831:543–554. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Riekhof WR, Wu J, Jones JL, Voelker DR. Identification and characterization of the major lysophosphatidylethanolamine acyltransferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:28344–28352. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705256200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ridgway ND, Vance DE. Purification of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase from rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:17231–17239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vance DE, Walkey CJ, Cui Z. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase from liver. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1348:142–150. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2760(97)00108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ardail DPI, Bodennec J, Louisot P, Schmitt D, Portoukalian J. The mitochondria-associated endoplasmic-reticulum subcompartment (MAM fraction) of rat liver contains highly active sphingolipid-specific glycosyltransferases. Biochem. J. 2003;371:1013–1019. doi: 10.1042/bj20021834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Osman C, Voelker DR, Langer T. Making heads or tails of phospholipids in mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2011;192:7–16. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Voelker DR. Phosphatidylserine translocation to the mitochondrion is an ATP-dependent process in permeabilized animal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:9921–9925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Arikketh D, Nelson R, Vance JE. Defining the importance of phosphatidylserine synthase-1 (PSS1): unexpected viability of PSS1-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:12888–12897. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800714200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tasseva G, Bai HD, Davidescu M, Haromy A, Michelakis E, Vance JE. Phosphatidylethanolamine deficiency in Mammalian mitochondria impairs oxidative phosphorylation and alters mitochondrial morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:4158–4173. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.434183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wideman JG, Gawryluk RM, Gray MW, Dacks JB. The ancient and widespread nature of the ER-mitochondria encounter structure. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2013;30:2044–2049. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kornmann B, Osman C, Walter P. The conserved GTPase Gem1 regulates endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria connections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:14151–14156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111314108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Flinner N, Ellenrieder L, Stiller SB, Becker T, Schleiff E, Mirus O. Mdm10 is an ancient eukaryotic porin co-occurring with the ERMES complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:3314–3325. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stroud DA, Oeljeklaus S, Wiese S, Bohnert M, Lewandrowski U, Sickmann A, et al. Composition and topology of the endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria encounter structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;413:743–750. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jeong H, Park J, Lee C. Crystal structure of Mdm12 reveals the architecture and dynamic organization of the ERMES complex. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:1857–1871. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Elbaz-Alon Y, Eisenberg-Bord M, Shinder V, Stiller SB, Shimoni E, Wiedemann N, et al. Lam6 regulates the extent of contacts between organelles. Cell Rep. 2015;12:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Elbaz-Alon Y, Rosenfeld-Gur E, Shinder V, Futerman AH, Geiger T, Schuldiner M. A dynamic interface between vacuoles and mitochondria in yeast. Dev. Cell. 2014;30:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gatta, A. T., Wong, L. H., Sere, Y. Y., Calderon-Norena, D. M., Cockcroft, S., Menon, A. K. et al. A new family of StART domain proteins at membrane contact sites has a role in ER-PM sterol transport. eLife4, e07253 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 77.Nguyen TT, Lewandowska A, Choi JY, Markgraf DF, Junker M, Bilgin M, et al. Gem1 and ERMES do not directly affect phosphatidylserine transport from ER to mitochondria or mitochondrial inheritance. Traffic. 2012;13:880–890. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01352.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lahiri S, Chao JT, Tavassoli S, Wong AK, Choudhary V, Young BP, et al. A conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC) facilitates phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria. PloS Biol. 2014;12:e1001969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Vance JE, S SJ, Faust JR. Abnormalities in mitochondria-associated membranes and phospholipid biosynthetic enzymes in the mnd/mnd mouse model of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1997;1344:286–299. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2760(96)00153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Carcel-Trullols J, Kovacs AD, Pearce DA. Cell biology of the NCL proteins: what they do and don’t do. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1852:2242–2255. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nita DA, Mole SE, Minassian BA. Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18:73–88. doi: 10.1684/epd.2016.0844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yin D. Biochemical basis of lipofuscin, ceroid, and age pigment-like fluorophores. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1996;21:871–888. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(96)00175-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lonka L, Kyttala A, Ranta S, Jalanko A, Lehesjoki AE. The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis CLN8 membrane protein is a resident of the endoplasmic reticulum. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000;9:1691–1697. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.11.1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hermansson M, Kakela R, Berghall M, Lehesjoki AE, Somerharju P, Lahtinen U. Mass spectrometric analysis reveals changes in phospholipid, neutral sphingolipid and sulfatide molecular species in progressive epilepsy with mental retardation, EPMR, brain: a case study. J. Neurochem. 2005;95:609–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ranta S, Zhang Y, Ross B, Lonka L, Takkunen E, Messer A, et al. The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses in human EPMR and mnd mutant mice are associated with mutations in CLN8. Nat. Genet. 1999;23:233–236. doi: 10.1038/13868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cornell RB, Ridgway ND. CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase: function, regulation, and structure of an amphitropic enzyme required for membrane biogenesis. Prog. Lipid Res. 2015;59:147–171. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Galizzi G, Russo D, Deidda I, Cascio C, Passantino R, Guarneri R, et al. Different early ER-stress responses in the CLN8(mnd) mouse model of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Neurosci. Lett. 2011;488:258–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kolikova J, Afzalov R, Surin A, Lehesjoki AE, Khiroug L. Deficient mitochondrial Ca(2+) buffering in the Cln8(mnd) mouse model of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Cell Calcium. 2011;50:491–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Payne AH, Hales DB. Overview of steroidogenic enzymes in the pathway from cholesterol to active steroid hormones. Endocrine Rev. 2004;25:947–970. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Suckling KE, Stange EF. Role of acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase in cellular cholesterol metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 1985;26:647–671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Puglielli L, Tanzi RE, Kovacs DM. Alzheimer’s disease: the cholesterol connection. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:345–351. doi: 10.1038/nn0403-345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Silvente-Poirot S, Poirot M. Cancer. Cholesterol and cancer, in the balance. Science. 2014;343:1445–1446. doi: 10.1126/science.1252787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Vassilev B, Sihto H, Li S, Holtta-Vuori M, Ilola J, Lundin J, et al. Elevated levels of StAR-related lipid transfer protein 3 alter cholesterol balance and adhesiveness of breast cancer cells: potential mechanisms contributing to progression of HER2-positive breast cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:987–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tomita K, Teratani T, Suzuki T, Shimizu M, Sato H, Narimatsu K, et al. Free cholesterol accumulation in hepatic stellate cells: mechanism of liver fibrosis aggravation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2014;59:154–169. doi: 10.1002/hep.26604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee H, Rotolo JA, Mesicek J, Penate-Medina T, Rimner A, Liao WC, et al. Mitochondrial ceramide-rich macrodomains functionalize Bax upon irradiation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Doghman-Bouguerra M, Lalli E. The ER-mitochondria couple: in life and death from steroidogenesis to tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017;441:176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Prasad M, Kaur J, Pawlak KJ, Bose M, Whittal RM, Bose HS. Mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane (MAM) regulates steroidogenic activity via steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)-voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:2604–2616. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.605808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fujimoto M, Hayashi T, Su TP. The role of cholesterol in the association of endoplasmic reticulum membranes with mitochondria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;417:635–639. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hayashi T, Su TP. Cholesterol at the endoplasmic reticulum: roles of the sigma-1 receptor chaperone and implications thereof in human diseases. Subcell Biochem. 2010; 51:381–398. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8622-8_13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hayashi TSTP. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones at the ER-mitochondrion interface regulate Ca(2+) signaling and cell survival. Cell. 2007;131:596–610. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sonnino S, Prinetti A. Gangliosides as regulators of cell membrane organization and functions. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010;688:165–184. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.d’Azzo ATA, Sano R. Gangliosides as apoptotic signals in ER stress response. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:404–414. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ledeen R, Wu G. New findings on nuclear gangliosides: overview on metabolism and function. J. Neurochem. 2011;116:714–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Reiss K, Reiter DM, Stehle T, Dermody TS. The sweet spot: defining virus-sialic acid interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:739–749. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Schengrund CL. Gangliosides: glycosphingolipids essential for normal neural development and function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015;40:397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lopez PH, Schnaar RL. Gangliosides in cell recognition and membrane protein regulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009;19:549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Regina Todeschini A, Hakomori SI. Functional role of glycosphingolipids and gangliosides in control of cell adhesion, motility, and growth, through glycosynaptic microdomains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1780:421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tessitore A, dPM M, Sano R, Ma Y, Mann L, Ingrassia A, Laywell ED, Steindler DA, Hendershot LM, d’Azzo A. GM1-ganglioside-mediated activation of the unfolded protein response causes neuronal death in a neurodegenerative gangliosidosis. Mol. Cell. 2004;15:753–766. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pukel CS, Lloyd KO, Travassos LR, Dippold WG, Oettgen HF, Old LJ. GD3, a prominentganglioside of human melanoma. Detection and characterisation by mouse monoclonalantibody. J. Exp. Med. 1982;155:1133–1147. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.4.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Merritt WD, Casper JT, Lauer SJ, Reaman GH. Expression of GD3 ganglioside in childhood T-cell lymphoblastic malignancies. Cancer Res. 1987;47:1724–1730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.De Maria R, Lenti L, Malisan F, d’Agostino F, Tomassini B, Zeuner A, et al. Requirement for GD3 ganglioside in CD95- and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Science. 1997;277:1652–1655. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5332.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Malisan F, Testi R. GD3 ganglioside and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1585:179–187. doi: 10.1016/S1388-1981(02)00339-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Garofalo T, Giammarioli AM, Misasi R, Tinari A, Manganelli V, Gambardella L, et al. Lipid microdomains contribute to apoptosis-associated modifications of mitochondria in T cells. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1378–1389. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yoshii, S. R., Mizushima, N. Monitoring and measuring autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18, pii: E1865 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 116.Matarrese P, Garofalo T, Manganelli V, Gambardella L, Marconi M, Grasso M, et al. Evidence for the involvement of GD3 ganglioside in autophagosome formation and maturation. Autophagy. 2014;10:750–765. doi: 10.4161/auto.27959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Garofalo T, Matarrese P, Manganelli V, Marconi M, Tinari A, Gambardella L, et al. Evidence for the involvement of lipid rafts localized at the ER-mitochondria associated membranes in autophagosome formation. Autophagy. 2016;12:917–935. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1160971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ledeen RW, Wu G. Ganglioside function in calcium homeostasis and signaling. Neurochem. Res. 2002;27:637–647. doi: 10.1023/A:1020224016830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Ledeen RW, Wu G. GM1 ganglioside: another nuclear lipid that modulates nuclear calcium. GM1 potentiates the nuclear sodium-calcium exchanger. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2006;84:393–402. doi: 10.1139/y05-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Suzuki, Y. A. O. & Namba, E. b-Galactosidase deficiency (b-Galactosialidosis): GM1 gangliosidosis and Morquio B disease. In The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (eds Scriver, C. et al.) 3775–3810 (McGraw-Hill Publishing Co, New York, 2014).
  • 121.Hahn CN, dPM M, Schröder M, Vanier MT, Hara Y, Suzuki K, Suzuki K, d’Azzo A. Generalized CNS disease and massive GM1-ganglioside accumulation in mice defective in lysosomal acid beta-galactosidase. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997;6:205–211. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.2.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Itoh M, Matsuda J, Suzuki O, Ogura A, Oshima A, Tai T, et al. Development of lysosomal storage in mice with targeted disruption of the beta-galactosidase gene: a model of human G(M1)-gangliosidosis. Brain Dev. 2001;23:379–384. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00244-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jeyakumar M, Thomas R, Elliot-Smith E, Smith DA, van der Spoel AC, d’Azzo A, et al. Central nervous system inflammation is a hallmark of pathogenesis in mouse models of GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis. Brain. 2003;126:974–987. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007;8:519–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011;334:1081–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.1209038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;13:89–102. doi: 10.1038/nrm3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.d’Azzo A, Bonten E. Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis in a glycosphingolipid and a glycoprotein storage disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010;38:1453–1457. doi: 10.1042/BST0381453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bonten EJ, Annunziata I, d’Azzo A. Lysosomal multienzyme complex: pros and cons of working together. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:2017–2032. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1538-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Stone SJ. VJPs-a-altm-amJBC-. Phosphatidylserine synthase-1 and -2 are localized to mitochondria-associated membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;3:34534–34540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002865200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA, et al. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-beta. Nature. 2000;403:98–103. doi: 10.1038/47513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Szabadkai G, Bianchi K, Varnai P, De Stefani D, Wieckowski MR, Cavagna D, et al. Chaperone-mediated coupling of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial Ca2+ channels. J. Cell Biol. 2006;175:901–911. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Mikoshiba, K. The IP3 receptor/Ca2+ channel and its cellular function. Biochem. Soc. Symp.74, 9–22 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 134.Wang M, Wey S, Zhang Y, Ye R, Lee AS. Role of the unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP in development, cancer, and neurological disorders. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2009;11:2307–2316. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Myhill N, Lynes EM, Nanji JA, Blagoveshchenskaya AD, Fei H, Carmine Simmen K, et al. The subcellular distribution of calnexin is mediated by PACS-2. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:2777–2788. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-10-0995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Garofalo TGA, Misasi R, Tinari A, Manganelli V, Gambardella L, Pavan A, Malorni W, Sorice M . Lipid microdomains contribute to apoptosis-associated modifications of mitochondria in T cells. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1378–1389. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.James DI, Parone PA, Mattenberger Y, Martinou JC. hFis1, a novel component of the mammalian mitochondrial fission machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:36373–36379. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303758200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kantari C, Walczak H. Caspase-8 and bid: caught in the act between death receptors and mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1813:558–563. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Birkinshaw, R. W., Czabotar, P. E. The BCL-2 family of proteins and mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., pii: S1084-9521(17)30189-1, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 140.Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature. 2010;466:68–76. doi: 10.1038/nature09204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Colecchia D, Strambi A, Sanzone S, Iavarone C, Rossi M, Dall’Armi C, et al. MAPK15/ERK8 stimulates autophagy by interacting with LC3 and GABARAP proteins. Autophagy. 2012;8:1724–1740. doi: 10.4161/auto.21857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Itoh T, Kanno E, Uemura T, Waguri S, Fukuda M. OATL1, a novel autophagosome-resident Rab33B-GAP, regulates autophagosomal maturation. J. Cell. Biol. 2011;192:839–853. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201008107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Khaminets A, Heinrich T, Mari M, Grumati P, Huebner AK, Akutsu M, et al. Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature. 2015;522:354–358. doi: 10.1038/nature14498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Lee JE, Jeon IS, Han NE, Song HJ, Kim EG, Choi JW, et al. Ubiquilin 1 interacts with Orai1 to regulate calcium mobilization. Mol. Cell. 2013;35:41–46. doi: 10.1007/s10059-013-2268-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Pankiv S, Alemu EA, Brech A, Bruun JA, Lamark T, Overvatn A, et al. FYCO1 is a Rab7 effector that binds to LC3 and PI3P to mediate microtubule plus end-directed vesicle transport. J. Cell Biol. 2010;188:253–269. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Popovic D, Akutsu M, Novak I, Harper JW, Behrends C, Dikic I. Rab GTPase-activating proteins in autophagy: regulation of endocytic and autophagy pathways by direct binding to human ATG8 modifiers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;32:1733–1744. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06717-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Rothenberg C, Srinivasan D, Mah L, Kaushik S, Peterhoff CM, Ugolino J, et al. Ubiquilin functions in autophagy and is degraded by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010;19:3219–3232. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Sancho A, Duran J, Garcia-Espana A, Mauvezin C, Alemu EA, Lamark T, et al. DOR/Tp53inp2 and Tp53inp1 constitute a metazoan gene family encoding dual regulators of autophagy and transcription. PloS ONE>. 2012;7:e34034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Seidenbecher CI, Landwehr M, Smalla KH, Kreutz M, Dieterich DC, Zuschratter W, et al. Caldendrin but not calmodulin binds to light chain 3 of MAP1A/B: an association with the microtubule cytoskeleton highlighting exclusive binding partners for neuronal Ca(2+)-sensor proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;336:957–970. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Suzuki H, Tabata K, Morita E, Kawasaki M, Kato R, Dobson RC, et al. Structural basis of the autophagy-related LC3/Atg13 LIR complex: recognition and interaction mechanism. Structure. 2014;22:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Tang Z, Lin MG, Stowe TR, Chen S, Zhu M, Stearns T, et al. Autophagy promotes primary ciliogenesis by removing OFD1 from centriolar satellites. Nature. 2013;502:254–257. doi: 10.1038/nature12606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Zhu Y, Massen S, Terenzio M, Lang V, Chen-Lindner S, Eils R, et al. Modulation of serines 17 and 24 in the LC3-interacting region of Bnip3 determines pro-survival mitophagy versus apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:1099–1113. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.399345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Di Bartolomeo S, Corazzari M, Nazio F, Oliverio S, Lisi G, Antonioli M, et al. The dynamic interaction of AMBRA1 with the dynein motor complex regulates mammalian autophagy. J. Cell. Biol. 2010;191:155–168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201002100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Di Rita A, Strappazzon F. AMBRA1, a novel BH3-like protein: new insights into the AMBRA1-BCL2-family proteins relationship. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017;330:85–113. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Proikas-Cezanne T, Waddell S, Gaugel A, Frickey T, Lupas A, Nordheim A. WIPI-1alpha (WIPI49), a member of the novel 7-bladed WIPI protein family, is aberrantly expressed in human cancer and is linked to starvation-induced autophagy. Oncogene. 2004;23:9314–9325. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Schroder M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:862–894. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7383-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES