Abstract
Pyroptosis is a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death that is caused by infection with intracellular pathogens and activation of canonical or noncanonical inflammasomes. The purinergic receptor P2X7 is activated by the noncanonical inflammasome and contributes essentially to pyroptotic cell death. The Ca2+ activated phospholipid scramblase and ion channel TMEM16F has been shown earlier to control cellular effects downstream of purinergic P2X7 receptors that ultimately lead to cell death. As pyroptotic cell death is accompanied by an increases in intracellular Ca2+, we asked whether TMEM16F is activated during pyroptosis. The N-terminal cleavage product of gasdermin D (GD-N) is an executioner of pyroptosis by forming large plasma membrane pores. Expression of GD-N enhanced basal Ca2+ levels and induced cell death. We observed that GD-N induced cell death in HEK293 and HAP1 cells, which was depending on expression of endogenous TMEM16F. GD-N activated large whole cell currents that were suppressed by knockdown or inhibition of TMEM16F. The results suggest that whole cell currents induced by the pore forming domain of gasdermin-D, are at least in part due to activation of TMEM16F. Knockdown of other TMEM16 paralogues expressed in HAP1 cells suggest TMEM16F as a crucial element during pyroptosis and excluded a role of other TMEM16 proteins. Thus TMEM16F supports pyroptosis and other forms of inflammatory cell death such as ferroptosis. Its potent inhibition by tannic acid may be part of the anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids.
Introduction
Intracellular Ca2+ is enhanced during many biological processes including inflammation. Ca2+ mobilization is suggested to have a role in the regulation of NLRP3 (NOD, LRR, and pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasome, a large supramolecular complex that activates caspase-1 during pyroptosis. Pyroptosis, a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death, occurs upon infection with intracellular pathogens and is part of the antimicrobial response. In contrast to apoptosis, pyroptotic cell death results in plasma membrane (PM) rupture and release of so called damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules1. Inflammasomes activate caspase-1 or caspase 11/4/5, which cleave the pore-forming N-terminal part of gasdermin D that drives the cell into lytic cell death2–4. Large gasdermin D pores are regarded as effectors of pyroptosis. These pores may lead to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ by permeabilizing the plasma membrane and probably also intracellular membranes. Moreover, noncanonical inflammasomes lead to caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis due to activation of pannexin-1, release of ATP binding to purinergic P2X7 receptors and consecutively increases intracellular Ca2+ 5. Notably the Ca2+ activated phospholipid scramblase and ion channel TMEM16F has been shown to participate in the cellular effects downstream of P2X7 receptors that finally lead to cell death6.
TMEM16F belongs to a family of 10 proteins (TMEM16A-K; anoctamin 1–10)7. These proteins are localized in the plasma membrane or in intracellular membrane compartments. Apart from TMEM16A and B, which are Ca2+ activated chloride channels without scrambling activity, other TMEM16 proteins expose phosphatidylserine to the outer plasma membrane leaflet and conduct ions when activated by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ 8–14. Evidence has been provided that TMEM16F (i) participates in cell shrinkage and presumably apoptotic cell death15–17, (ii) forms an outwardly rectifying Cl− channel (ORCC) that is activated during death of immune cells6,18,19, and (iii) is activated during other forms of programmed cell death such as necroptosis and ferroptosis20,21. In the present study we asked whether TMEM16F is also activated during pyroptosis and, if so, whether it contributes to pyroptotic cell death.
Results
TMEM16F supports gasdermin D-induced cell death
In order to examine cell death induced by gasdermin D we expressed the amino-terminal pore–forming domain of gasdermin D (GD-N) in HEK293 cells. Cells were examined by flow cytometry after 24 h of expression, which indicated a high percentage of death, i.e., 7-AAD-positive cells, when compared to mock transfected cells (Fig. 1a, b). Interestingly, when GD-N-transfected cells were grown in the presence of the TMEM16F-inhibitor tannic acid (TA), the cell death-inducing effect of GD-N was completely abolished, suggesting that TMEM16F contributes to GD-N induced cell death. LDH-release was assessed after 24 h expression of full−length gasdermin (GD) and GD-N. While GD expressing cells showed only a small increase in LDH release, LDH release by GD-N expressing cells was remarkable, and was significantly inhibited by three different inhibitors of TMEM16F, CaCCinhAO1 (AO1), TA or niflumic acid (NFA) (Fig. 1c). Moreover, knockdown of TMEM16F, expressed endogenously in HEK293 cells, suppressed cell death induced by GD and GD-N (Fig. 1d, f). Expression of full−length gasdermin D (GD) and N-terminal fragment of gasdermin D (GD-N) was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry using gasdermin D antibody. While GD was found to be distributed homogenously throughout the cytosol, GD-N was localized as spots in the plasma membrane (Fig. 1e). Finally, GD-N induced LDH release was reduced in Scott B-lymphocytes (Scott-BL), which lack of expression of TMEM16F19, when compared to wt B-lymphocytes expressing TMEM16F (Scott-BL) (Fig. 1g, h). Taken together the data strongly suggest support of gasdermin D-induced cell death by TMEM16F.
Increase in intracellular Ca2+ and activation of whole cell Cl− currents by expression of pore forming gasdermin D
As the N-terminal pore–forming domain of gasdermin D (GD-N) is likely to lead to an increase in intracellular Ca2+, we examined intracellular Ca2+ levels in cells expressing GD-N or in mock transfected cells, using the Ca2+ sensitive dye Fura2. The data indicate that baseline Ca2+ levels were enhanced in cells expressing GD-N. Interestingly, increase in intracellular Ca2+ in GD-N expressing cells was completely inhibited by tannic acid (Fig. 2a, b). This suggests that TMEM16 proteins, which are inhibited by tannic acid, have a role in GD-N induced Ca2+ increase. In fact, an earlier report demonstrated Ca2+ permeability of TMEM16F14. Because GD-N increased intracellular Ca2+, we examined ion currents activated during pyroptotic cell death (Fig. 2c, d). In whole cell patch clamp experiments we detected a whole cell current in HEK293 cells expressing GD-N, but not in cells expressing full length GD or in mock transfected cells (Fig. 2d, f). GD-N induced whole cell currents were outwardly rectifying and showed no consistent time dependence (Figs. 2d, e, 3). The enhanced whole cell currents found in GD-N expressing cells were potently inhibited by removal of extracellular Cl−, indicating a permeability of the current for Cl− (Fig. 2e). The GD-N induced currents were also inhibited by the TMEM16F inhibitors CaCCinhAO1 (AO1) and tannic acid (TA; Fig. 3a, b). Moreover, knockdown of endogenous TMEM16F significantly inhibited GD-N induced whole cell currents (Fig. 3c, d). The results therefore suggest that whole cell currents induced by the pore forming domain of gasdermin-D are at least partially due to activation of TMEM16F.
Knockdown of TMEM16F in HAP1 cells inhibits Ca2+-activated exposure of phosphatidylserine and GD-N induced cell death
We examined TMEM16F and its role for gasdermin-induced cell death in the haploid leukemia cells line HAP122. This cell line was chosen because it was also available as TMEM16F-knockout cell line (horizon, Cambridge, UK). Moreover, it was straightforward to knockout additional TMEM16 paralogues expressed in HAP1 cells by CRISPR/Cas9, and to examine their potential contribution to gasdermin-induced cell death. RT-PCR analysis indicated expression of TMEM16D,F,H,K in HAP1 parental cells (Fig. 4a). Expression of these TMEM16 paralogues in HAP1 parental cells was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 4b). No expression of TMEM16F was detected in TMEM16F-knockout HAP1 cells (KO-T16F). Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of the remaining TMEM16 paralogues D,H,K (KO-T16all) was also confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 4b). TMEM16A was not detected in HAP1 cells. FACS analysis demonstrated Ca2+-induced exposure of phosphatidylserine (phospholipid scrambling) in parental cells, which was absent in KO-T16F and KO-T16all cells (Fig. 4c, d). Knockout of TMEM16F or TMEM116D,F,H,K progressively attenuated cell proliferation (Fig. 4e). An anti-proliferative effect of TMEM16F knockout has also been observed in another study23. Moreover, similar to the study by Schenk et al, we observed slightly enhanced phospholipid scrambling after knockdown of TMEM16F and other TMEM16 proteins (Fig. 4d). The scramblase Xkr824 was also found to be expressed in HAP1 cells (in semiquantitative (sq) RT-PCR and Western blots, not shown). Interestingly, by sqRT-PCR we found an upregulation of Xkr8 expression relative to GAPDH from 0.49 ± 0.031 (parental) to 0.86 ± 0.058 (KO_16F) and 1.1 ± 0,37 (KO_T16all; all n = 3). This may explain the lower basal scrambling activity in TMEM16F expressing cells. This was further supported by experiments in which we knocked down expression of Xkr8 by siRNA (by 95.1 %, parental; 96.2%, KO_T16F; 66.9%, KO_T16all), which significantly reduced basal scrambling in the three different cell lines. Finally, we reported earlier that TMEM16 proteins have a significant impact on cytosolic Ca2+ levels, which may affect cell proliferation and basal scrambling activity25. In fact, knockdown of TMEM16K had a pronounced inhibitory effect on TNFα-induced cell death26.
Knockout of TMEM16F or all TMEM16 proteins did not affect basal Ca2+ levels (Fig. 5a). We examined enhanced intracellular Ca2+ concentrations by stimulation with ATP (100 µM), or cyclopiazonic acid (CPA, 10 µM) in the presence of a Ca2+ free extracellular bath solution. ATP-induced rise in intracellular Ca2+ was significantly reduced in KO_T16F and KO_T16all cells, corresponding to earlier observations in other cell types25 (Fig. 5b). Using HAP1 cells, we examined the role of TMEM16F for gasdermin-induced cell death. Cell death induced by expression of GD-N was twice as frequent in parental cells when compared to cells lacking expression of TMEM16F (KO-T16F). Additional knockdown of TMEM16D,H,K did (KO_T16all) did not further reduce GD-N induced cell death (Fig. 5c). Single additional knockdown of TMEM16D,H,K did not show additional effects. Similar to GD-N transfected HEK293 cells, we also observed enhanced baseline Ca2+ levels in GD-N expressing HAP1 cells, which was potently suppressed by tannic acid (Fig. 5d). We also examined other forms of programmed cell death, such as ferroptosis (using the cystine import inhibitor erastin and the GPX4 inhibitor RSL3) or apoptosis (by incubation with TNFα). Both ferroptosis and apoptosis were significantly attenuated in cells lacking expression of TMEM16F (Fig. 5e, f). Analysis of cell morphology by quantitative holographic phase microscopy demonstrated the impressive attenuation of apoptosis in cells lacking expression of TMEM16F (Fig. 5g). These results are in line with earlier observations that suggested an impact of TMEM16F on apoptotic and ferroptotic cell death, respectively, and an activation of TMEM16F during necroptosis6,15,16,20,21. The present report now adds pyroptosis to this list, as another regulated cell death pathway that includes simultaneous activation of TMEM16F. Future studies should examine whether TMEM16F could serve as a drug target to control both inflammatory and non-inflammatory cell death.
Discussion
Increase in intracellular Ca2+ by initial Ca2+ store release and subsequent store operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) is essential to drive a number of processes that operate in immune cells, such as degranulation and cytotoxicity by CD8+T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, production of reactive oxygen species in neutrophils via NADPH oxidase, and phagocytosis by macrophages27. We demonstrated earlier that Ca2+ activated TMEM16F mediates a number of functions in macrophages, downstream of P2X7 receptors6. Initial cell shrinkage and subsequent cell swelling was related to progressive activation of TMEM16F. Gasdermin D binds to phosphatidylinositol species and phosphatidylserine and forms large nonselective pores4. Expression of TMEM16F is particularly high in macrophages, where it supports phagocytic activity and cell death. The present data now imply that TMEM16F may have also a significant impact on pyroptotic cell lysis and subsequent phagocytosis by neutrophils. Consequently, TMEM16F is likely to affected inflammation. Notably, TMEM16F was found recently to be activated during ferroptotic cell death, induced by lipid peroxidation21,28. Taken together, TMEM16F contributes to different forms of regulated cell death such as apoptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis. It may therefore contribute to inflammation, hypersensitivity and generation of pain, and might represent a pharmacological target during inflammatory diseases”.
Although it is emerging that TMEM16F and probably other TMEM16 paralogues have a role in programmed cell death, it is not clear whether they do so by operating as a channel/scramblase or by affecting intracellular Ca2+ levels6,15,16,29. In fact, recent work suggests that TMEM16F and other TMEM16 proteins control intracellular Ca2+ signals, thereby affecting numerous cellular functions25,30. TMEM16F may operate as a plasma membrane localized nonselective Ca2+ influx channel14 or as a passive Cl−/nonselective channel that counterbalances charge movements occurring during ER Ca2+ store release or Ca2+ influx25.
Inflammatory stimuli that enhance intracellular Ca2+ levels or modify plasma membrane phospholipids also activate TMEM16F15,21,28. Thus PLA2 not only acts as a central switch that turns on synthesis of numerous proinflammatory mediators31, but also serves as a powerful activator of TMEM16F15. Similarly, proinflammatory and lipid peroxidizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also powerful activators, and both PLA2 and ROS do not require increase in cytosolic Ca2+ to activate TMEM16F15,21. In contrast, TMEM16F did not contribute to necroptotic cell death, although it might be activated during necroptosis20. In contrast, the present data suggest a significant contribution of TMEM16 to pyroptosis. In this context is might be of interest that membrane stabilizing tannic acid and other flavonoids32 are potent inhibitors of TMEM16F and strong anti-inflammatory/ antioxidant molecules15,33–35. Remarkably, tannic acid completely suppressed ATP-induced membrane blebbing in mouse macrophages6. Finally, TMEM16F is essential for activation of ADAM17 (Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 17), which in turn is required for release of interleukin 6 receptors causing proinflammatory IL-6 trans-signaling36,37. The present data expand the proinflammatory role of TMEM16F to another highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death.
Methods
Generation of TMEM16-knockout cell lines by Crispr/Cas9, RT-PCR, and cell culture
HAP1 cells were transfected with the CRISPR_CD4 plasmids obtained through ThermoFisher Scientific® (Schwerte, Germany) using Lipofectamine3000 (Life technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1). Cells were collected and selected 3 days after transfection. Selected cells were expanded and genomic DNA was isolated to determine the efficiency of locus-specific double-strand break formation using GeneArt® Genomic Cleavage Detection (Invitrogen). HAP1 cells (Thermo Fisher scientific) were grown in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Total RNA was isolated from CRISPR cells using RNeasy Mini-Kit (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany). Two μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed in 50 μl buffer for 1 h at 40 °C, using a random primer and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Mannheim, Germany). Thirty cycles of RT–PCR was performed using standard procedures (GoTaq DNA Polymerase, Promega), 1 μl RT using primers for TMEM16 proteins described earlier38 (Table 2). PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels.
Table 1.
Target Name | Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
---|---|
CRISPR_CD4_ANO4.1 | TGACGGGCCAAAGAGTGATG |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO4.2 | GTAGTATTTGCATATCCAGC |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO4.3 | AGAGAATCGTCATCTTTGCA |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO8.1 | CCGATGACCACACGCTGCTA |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO8.2 | ATACGTGGCGGTGACAAAGA |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO8.3 | AGCACGTCGCAGTTCTCTGT |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO10.1 | GGTGGTCATAGAACTTGCTC |
CRISPR_CD4_ANO10.2 | GCAAGTTCTATGACCACCAA |
Table 2.
Anoctamin | PCR-Primer | Size (bp) |
---|---|---|
ANO1 (16a) | 5‘-CGACTACGTGTACATTTTCCG 5‘-GATTCCGATGTCTTTGGCTC | 445 |
ANO2 (16b) | 5‘-GTCTCAAGATGCCAGGTCCC 5‘-CTGCCTCCTGCTTTGATCTC | 553 |
ANO3 (16c) | 5‘-CTTCCCTCTTCCAGTCAAC 5‘-AAACATGATATCGGGGCTTG | 461 |
ANO4 (16d) | 5‘-CGGAAGATTTACAGGACACCC 5-GATAACAGAGAGAATTCCAATGC | 503 |
ANO5 (16e) | 5‘-GAATGGGACCTGGTGGAC 5‘-GAGTTTGTCCGAGCTTTTCG | 713 |
ANO6 (16 f) | 5‘-CAAATGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAC 5‘-GGTGCGTGTACTTTTACAAATAC | 356 |
ANO7 (16 g) | 5‘-CTCGGGAGTGACAACCAGG 5‘-CAAAGTGGGCACATCTCGAAG | 470 |
ANO8 (16 h) | 5‘-GGAGGACCAG CCAATCATC 5‘-TCCATGTCATTGAGCCAG | 705 |
ANO9 (16j) | 5‘-GCAGCCAGTT GATGAAATC 5‘-GCTGCGTAGGTAGGAGTGC | 472 |
ANO10 (16k) | 5‘-GTGAAGAGGAAGGTGCAGG 5‘-GCCACTGCGAAACTGAGAAG | 769 |
GAPDH | 5‘-GTATTGGGCGCCTGGTCAC 5‘-CTCCTGGAAGATGGTGATGG | 200 bp |
Cell proliferation assay
Cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 8 × 103 cells per well for the time duration as indicated (0, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h). At the end of incubation, cells were washed with 150 μl of phosphate buffered solution (D-PBSCa2+/Mg2+). Afterwards cells were incubated for 2 h in 100 μl of fresh media containing 0.5 mg/ml of the tetrazolium salt MTT. The dark blue formazan product was dissolved with DMSO and measured the absorbance at 540 nm.
Western Blotting of TMEM16D,F,H,K and immunocytochemistry
Cells were collected and lysed in 1% NP40 lysis buffer containing 1×protease inhibitor cocktail and DTT. Protein (30–50 µg) was separated by 8.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% NFM/TBST or 5% NFM/PBST at RT for 1 h and were incubated overnight at 4 °C with goat polyclonal anti-TMEM16D (diluted 1:500 in 3% NFM/PBST, Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-TMEM16F (diluted 1:5000 in 5% NFM/TBST, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), goat polyclonal anti-TMEM16H (diluted 1:2000 in 5% NFM/PBST, Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-TMEM16K (diluted 1:2000 in 5% NFM/PBST, ANOVA, USA), or rabbit polyclonal anti-actin (diluted 1:10,000 in 5% NFM/TBST, Sigma). Subsequently, membranes were incubated with secondary AB at RT for 2 h. Immunoreactive signals were visualized using supersignal chemiluminescence substrate detection kit (Pierce Biotechonology, Rockford, USA). Gasdermin D full length and N-terminal fragment were labeled using gasdermin antibody sc-376318 (Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) and a secondary anti-mouse FITC-conjugated antibody.
Volume measurements using HoloMonitorTM
Cells were seeded in 35 mm dishes at a density of 300,000 cells/ dish. Cell morphology was observed after application of 10 µM ABT737 in IMDM medium containing 10% FBS or 100 ng/ml TNFα in OptiMEM for 24 h in a cell culture incubator (37 °C, humidified air, 5% CO2). The cell volume was calculated by quantitative phase microscopy in the HoloMonitorTM time-lapse cytometer (Phase Holographic imaging PHI, Lund, Sweden).
Flow cytometry
Cells were grown in 24-well plates for 24 h and were incubated afterwards with 10 μM ABT737 in IMDM medium containing 10% FBS or 100 ng/ml TNFα in OptimMEM medium for 24 h. Floating cells were collected initially, whereas adherent cells were collected by treatment with Accutase and centrifuged 500 × g 4 °C for 10 min. Cell pellets were washed with cold DPBS and stained with FITC-labeled annexin V and 7-AAD for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. At least 10,000 cells were analyzed immediately with BD Accuri™ C6 flow cytometer.
Caspase assay
Cells were plated in 24-well plates for 24 h and then incubated with 10 μM ABT737 in IMDM medium containing 10% FBS or 100 ng/ml TNFα in OptiMEM for 24 h. Floating cells were collected initially, whereas adherent cells were collected by treatment with Accutase and centrifuged 500 × g 4 °C for 10 min. Cell pellets were washed with cold DPBS and stained with 5 μM DEVD-NucView488 substrate for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. At least 10,000 cells were analyzed immediately with a BD Accuri™ C6 flow cytometer.
Lactate dehydrogenase release
HEK293 cells (8 × 104 cells/ml) were transfected with 2 ng/µl plasmid (pcDNA 3.1 (mock), full−length gasdermin D (GD), or the amino-terminal pore–forming domain of gasdermin D (GD-N), using Lipofectamine 2000. Supernatants were collected and measured using the CytoTox96® non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay (Promega) at a wavelength of 490 nm. Percentage of LDH release was calculated as 100 × (experimental LDH-spontaneous LDH) / (maximum LDH release-spontaneous LDH).
Ca2+ measurements
Cells were seeded on glass coverslips and loaded with 2 μM Fura-2/AM and 0.02% Pluronic F-127 (Life Technologies, Germany) in ringer solution (mmol l−1: NaCl 145; KH2PO4 0,4; K2HPO4 1,6; Glucose 5; MgCl2 1; Ca2+-Gluconat 1,3) for 1 h at room temperature. Fluorescence ratios at 340/380 nm were detected at 37 °C using an inverted microscope IMT-2 (Olympus, Nuremberg, Germany) and a high-speed polychromator system (Visi-Chrome, Puchheim, Germany). After calibration, intracellular Ca2+ concentrations upon background subtraction were calculated. Alternatively, cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 or the Ca2+ sensor Pl−G-CaMP2 for 3 days. ER Ca2+ signals were detected as previously described25.
Patch clamping
Cells were grown on coated glass cover slips. Patch pipettes were filled with a cytosolic-like (standard) solution containing KCl 30, K -gluconate 95, NaH2PO4 1.2, Na2HPO4 4.8, EGTA 1, Ca -gluconate 0.758, MgCl2 1.03, D-glucose 5, ATP 3, pH 7.2. In all experiments the bath was perfused for at least 5 min with control Ringer solution after establishing the whole cell configuration, in order to assure stable recording conditions. The intracellular (pipette) Ca2+ activity was 0.1 µM. In some experiments, all except of 5 mM Cl− was replaced by impermeable gluconate (5Cl−). Fast whole cell current recordings were performed as described recently18. In brief, the bath was perfused continuously with Ringer solution (containing (in mM) 145 NaCl, 0.4 KH2PO4, 1.6 K2HPO, 4.6 D-glucose, 1 MgCl2 1.3 Ca2+ gluconate; pH 7.4) at a rate of 8 ml/min. Patch pipettes had an input resistance of 2–4 MΩ and measured whole cell currents were corrected for serial resistance. Currents were recorded using a patch clamp amplifier (EPC 7, List Medical Electronics, Darmstadt, Germany), the LIH1600 interface and PULSE software (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) as well as Chart software (AD Instruments, Spechbach, Germany). In regular intervals, membrane voltage (Vc) was clamped in steps of 20 mV from −100 to +100 mV from a holding voltage of −100 mV. Current densities at +100 mV clamp voltage were calculated by dividing the measured whole cell currents by cell capacitance.
Materials and statistical analysis
All compounds used were of highest available grade of purity and were from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany), Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom), or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Cell culture reagents were from Invitrogen and Capricorn Scientific (Ebsdorfergrund, Germany). FACS reagents were from BD biosciences and BioLegend GmbH (Koblenz, Germany). Data are presented as Mean±SEM. Student’s t-test for paired or unpaired samples or Fisher’s exact test and analysis of variance were used, for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was accepted as significant difference.
Acknowledgements
Supported by DFG SFB699-A7/A12, DFG KU756/12-1, and Cystic Fibrosis Trust SRC 003, INOVCF (to K.K,).
Authors' contributions
J.O., P.W., R.S., and K.K. designed the research; J.O., P.W., and R.S. performed experiments; J.O., P.W., R.S., and K.K. analyzed data; J.O., P.W., R.S., and K.K. wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Jiraporn Ousingsawat, Podchanart Wanitchakool.
Edited by T Kaufmann
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:397–411. doi: 10.1038/nri3452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shi J, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526:660–665. doi: 10.1038/nature15514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kayagaki N, et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature. 2015;526:666–671. doi: 10.1038/nature15541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kovacs SB, Miao EA. Gasdermins: effectors of pyroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:673–684. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang D, He Y, Munoz-Planillo R, Liu Q, Nunez G. Caspase-11 requires the pannexin-1 channel and the purinergic P2X7 pore to mediate pyroptosis and endotoxic shock. Immunity. 2015;43:923–932. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ousingsawat J, et al. Anoctamin 6 mediates effects essential for innate immunity downstream of P2X7-receptors in macrophages. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6245. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pedemonte N, Galietta LJ. Structure and function of TMEM16 proteins (Anoctamins) Physiol. Rev. 2014;94:419–459. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00039.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kunzelmann K, et al. Molecular functions of anoctamin 6 (TMEM16F): a chloride channel, cation channel or phospholipid scramblase? Pflüg. Arch. 2014;466:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1305-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang T, Yu K, Hartzell HC, Tajkhorshid E. Lipids and ions traverse the membrane by the same physical pathway in the nhTMEM16 scramblase. Elife. 2017;6:e28671. doi: 10.7554/eLife.28671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tian Y, Schreiber R, Kunzelmann K. Anoctamins are a family of Ca2+ activated Cl− channels. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:4991–4998. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suzuki J, et al. Calcium-dependent phospholipid scramblase activity of TMEM16 family members. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:13305–13316. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.457937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suzuki J, Umeda M, Sims PJ, Nagata S. Calcium-dependent phospholipid scrambling by TMEM16F. Nature. 2010;468:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature09583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gyobu S, et al. A role of TMEM16E carrying a scrambling domain in sperm motility. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;36:645–659. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00919-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang H, et al. TMEM16F forms a Ca(2+)-activated cation channel required for lipid scrambling in platelets during blood coagulation. Cell. 2012;151:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sirianant L, Ousingsawat J, Wanitchakool P, Schreiber R, Kunzelmann K. Cellular volume regulation by Anoctamin 6:Ca2+, phospholipase A2,osmosensing. Pflüg. Arch. 2015;468:335–349. doi: 10.1007/s00424-015-1739-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Juul CA, et al. Anoctamin 6 differs from VRAC and VSOAC but is involved in apoptosis and supports volume regulation in the presence of Ca. Pflug. Arch. 2014;466:1899–1910. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1428-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Forschbach V, et al. Anoctamin 6 is localized in the primary cilium of renal tubular cells and is involved in apoptosis-dependent cyst lumen formation. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1899. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martins JR, et al. Anoctamin 6 is an essential component of the outwardly rectifying chloride channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18168–18172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108094108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kmit A, et al. Calcium-activated and apoptotic phospholipid scrambling induced by Ano6 can occur independently of Ano6 ion currents. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e611. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ousingsawat J, et al. Ca2+ signals, cell membrane disintegration, and activation of TMEM16F during necroptosis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016;74:173–181. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2338-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Simoes F, et al. CFTR supports cell death through ROS-dependent activation of TMEM16F (anoctamin 6) Pflug. Arch. 2017;470:305–314. doi: 10.1007/s00424-017-2065-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carette JE, et al. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature. 2011;477:340–343. doi: 10.1038/nature10348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schenk LK, Schulze U, Henke S, Weide T, Pavenstadt H. TMEM16F regulates baseline phosphatidylserine exposure and cell viability in human embryonic kidney cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2016;38:2452–2463. doi: 10.1159/000445596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Suzuki J, Denning DP, Imanishi E, Horvitz HR, Nagata S. Xk-related protein 8 and CED-8 promote phosphatidylserine exposure in apoptotic cells. Science. 2013;341:403–406. doi: 10.1126/science.1236758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cabrita I, et al. Differential effects of anoctamins on intracellular calcium signals. FASEB J. 2017;31:2123–2134. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600797RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wanitchakool P, et al. Cellular defects by deletion of ANO10 are due to deregulated local calcium signaling. Cell Signal. 2017;30:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Feske S. Immunodeficiency due to defects in store-operated calcium entry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1238:74–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schreiber R, et al. Regulation of TMEM16A/ANO1 and TMEM16F/ANO6 ion currents and phospholipid scrambling by Ca2+ and plasma membrane lipid. J. Physiol. 2017;596:217–229. doi: 10.1113/JP275175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wanitchakool P, et al. Cl- channels in apoptosis. Eur. Biophys. J. 2016;45:599–610. doi: 10.1007/s00249-016-1140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kunzelmann K, et al. Modulating Ca2+ signals: a common theme for TMEM16, Ist2, and TMC. Pflüg. Arch. 2016;468:475–490. doi: 10.1007/s00424-015-1767-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murakami M, Kudo I. Phospholipase A2. J. Biochem. 2002;131:285–292. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tarahovsky YS. Plant polyphenols in cell-cell interaction and communication. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008;3:609–611. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.8.6359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang X, Wang G, Gurley EC, Zhou H. Flavonoid apigenin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response through multiple mechanisms in macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim HP, Son KH, Chang HW, Kang SS. Anti-inflammatory plant flavonoids and cellular action mechanisms. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004;96:229–245. doi: 10.1254/jphs.CRJ04003X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Namkung W, Thiagarajah JR, Phuan PW, Verkman AS. Inhibition of Ca2+ -activated Cl- channels by gallotannins as a possible molecular basis for health benefits of red wine and green tea. FASEB J. 2010;24:4178–4186. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-160648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sommer A, et al. Phosphatidylserine exposure is required for ADAM17 sheddase function. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11523. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Atreya R, et al. Blockade of interleukin 6 trans signaling suppresses T-cell resistance against apoptosis in chronic intestinal inflammation: evidence in crohn disease and experimental colitis in vivo. Nat. Med. 2000;6:583–588. doi: 10.1038/75068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Almaca J, et al. TMEM16 proteins produce volume regulated chloride currents that are reduced in mice lacking TMEM16A. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:28571–28578. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.010074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]