Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2018 Jan 25;9(2):109. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0152-y

Regulatory B cells: the cutting edge of immune tolerance in kidney transplantation

Bo Peng 1, Yingzi Ming 1,✉, Cheng Yang 2,✉
PMCID: PMC5833552  PMID: 29371592

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal diseases. Although great improvement has been achieved, immune tolerance is still the Holy Grail that every organ transplant practitioner pursues. The role of B cells in transplantation has long been considered simply to serve as precursors of plasma cells, which produce alloantibodies and induce antibody-mediated rejection. Recent research indicates that a specialized subset of B cells plays an important role in immune regulation, which has been well demonstrated in autoimmune diseases, infections, and cancers. This category of regulatory B cells (Bregs) differs from conventional B cells, and they may help develop a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic strategy to achieve immune tolerance in transplantation. Here, we review the latest evidence regarding phenotypes, functions, and effectors of Bregs and discuss their diverse effects on kidney transplantation.

Facts

  • Besides antigen presenting and antibody production, B cells also play a role in immune regulation and tolerance induction through IL-10-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

  • A variety of B-cell subsets have been documented as regulatory B cells (Bregs), but no inclusive or specific marker has been found.

  • Bregs are usually induced and maintained in response to inflammation, and multiple pathways are involved in different settings.

  • Pan-B-cell depletion is not always beneficial for kidney transplantation. It depends on the timing of this approach.

  • Operationally tolerant patients of kidney transplantation show a special B-cell signature, and it can be used for prediction of tolerance.

Open questions

  • Are Bregs a distinct lineage of B cells, or just response to inflammation for all of them?

  • What exactly is it to make B cells develop into Bregs? Is epigenetics regulation involved?

  • What is the relationship between Bregs and other regulatory cells?

  • Can Bregs be used for cell therapy to induce tolerance in kidney transplantation?

Introduction

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal diseases. In past decades, dramatic improvement has been achieved regarding the short-term prognosis of kidney transplantation. However, long-term survival is still not ideal mainly because of chronic rejection (CR) mediated by antibodies1. Moreover, lifelong immunosuppressive therapy for most recipients inevitably causes undesired and even severe side effects such as infections, tumors, and metabolic disorders2. Therefore, it is the state of immune tolerance that every organ transplant practitioner eagerly desires to achieve.

For many years, T cells remained the focus of research regarding transplantation rejection and tolerance, and the pillar of the current immunosuppressive regimen is T-cell mediated3. As for B cells, they have long been considered simply as precursors of plasma cells, which produce alloantibodies and induce antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, recent studies highlighted a small population of B cells that showed immune regulatory functions in autoimmune diseases4, infections5, and cancers6, as well as organ transplantation2,7,8. This indicates the existence of regulatory B cells (Bregs) that function in more than a detrimental role in transplant immunity. It is time to re-examine the roles of B cells in transplantation and to additionally distinguish regulatory functions from inflammatory functions.

Herein, we review the latest evidence regarding phenotypes, functions, and effectors of Bregs and discuss their diverse effects on kidney transplantation.

The short history of Bregs

In 1974, B cells were initially presumed to contain a suppressive subset in the model of delayed hypersensitivity in guinea pigs9. However, the molecular or biochemical mechanism was unknown, and the conception of “suppressor B cells” was not widely accepted. It was not until the late 1990s that Bregs attracted attention again. Two independent studies showed that autoimmune diseases (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and chronic colitis) deteriorated in the B-cell-deficient group, providing further evidence of Bregs and suggesting their function in suppressing inflammation10,11. In 2000, Mizoguchi et al. first described B cells that suppressed inflammatory bowel disease using the term “regulatory B cell”12. Since then, various subsets of B cells have been shown to regulate immune responses in different settings, as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Subsets and effectors of Breg

Subsets Mouse Human Effector Different mechanisms should be seperated by ENTER or semicolon. Reference
Transitional 2 marginal zone precursor B cells/marginal zone precursor B cells CD21hiCD23+CD24hiIgMhiIgD+CD1d+ CD23+sIgMhisIgD+CD21/CD35hi IL-10 Suppress Th1/17 and T-cell proliferation (add ENTER or ";")Induce Tr1/Treg cells 50,84,104,105
Marginal zone B cells CD19+CD23-CD21+ – IL-10 Suppress antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell and CD4+ T-cell response  add ENTER or ";"Induce Tr1 cells 20,31,40
Peritoneal B1a B cells CD19+CD5+CD11b+ – IL-10 Regulate neutrophil infiltration (add ENTER or ";") Suppress CD4+ T-cell activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production 20,51
Plasma cells/plasmablasts CD138+/hiCD22- CD27intCD38+ IL-35, IL-10, Blimp1, IRF4 Inhibit Th1/17, neutrophils, natural killer cells and dendritic cells (add ENTER or ";") Regulate B cells antigen-presenting ability and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (add ENTER or ";")Induce IL-10-producing B cells and IL-35-producing B cells 22,37,46
B10 CD5+CD1dhi CD5+CD1dhi, CD24hiCD27+ IL-10 Suppress CD4+ T cells proliferation and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (add ENTER or ";") Suppress antigen-presenting function of dendritic cells Regulate monocyte cytokine production 16,31,39,52,54,55
TIM-1+ B cells CD19+TIM-1+ CD19+TIM-1+ IL-4, IL-10 Promote Th2 response (add ENTER or ";") Suppress Th1/17(add ENTER or ";") Suppress antibodies secreted by plasma cells 18,21,60,61,106
Naive B cells/transitional B cells – CD19+CD24+/hiCD38hi IL-10, TGF-β Suppress IFN-α production by plasmacytoid dendritic cellsadd  (ENTER or ";") Suppress T-cell proliferation, inhibit Th1/17 Induce Tregs and Tr1 cells 24,34,56,58,90,91,107
Circulating B cells – CD19+CD25hi CD27hiCD1dhi CD86hi IL-10, TGF-β Suppress T-cell proliferation (add ENTER or ";") Induce Tregs 68
Open in a new tab

Identifying specific markers for Bregs

Generally, any subset of B cells that exerts immune regulatory functions can be called Bregs because there is no consensus on its definition and classification. Based on this generalized conception, Bregs consist of a diversity of subsets as shown in Table 1. Given that interleukin (IL)-10 plays a central role in immune regulation, IL-10-producing B cells are sometimes narrowly defined as “Bregs” from a functional perspective13–15. Meanwhile, Tedder et al. also defined a distinct subset of B cells as “B10 cells”, which reflected their unique functional program (IL-10-competent in vivo and expressing IL-10 after a 5-h stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin ex vivo) and the fact that their anti-inflammatory effects were solely attributable to IL-10 production16,17. However, Bregs also function via IL-10-independent mechanisms including cytokines like IL-35 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and direct cell–cell contact; therefore, IL-10-producing B cells are not equivalent to Bregs.

Great efforts have been conducted to identify a specific marker for Bregs, just like CD25 and Foxp3 in regulatory T cells (Tregs); however, until now, none of them has been convincing7. CD5+CD1dhi B cells and T-cell Ig and mucin domain protein 1 (TIM-1+) B cells are promising hotspots of Bregs due to their simple cell surface markers and enrichment of IL-10-producing B cells16–18. As many as 15–20% of CD5+CD1dhi B cells are B10 cells. By contrast, the percentage of B10 cells in whole splenic B cells is only 1–3%16,17,19. However, it must be noted that CD5+CD1dhi B cells themselves only account for approximately 2% of whole splenic B cells; therefore, the majority of B10 cells are still within CD1dlo and CD5− populations16,18. Meanwhile, when CD5+CD1dhi and CD5−CD1dhi marginal zone B cells are cocultured with apoptotic cells respectively, the secretion of IL-10 increases in both groups, and the level of IL-10 has no significant difference20. TIM-1+ B cells appear to better encompass IL-10-producing B cells because nearly 70% of IL-10-producing B cells express TIM-118,21. Moreover, within the subsets of the marginal zone and the transitional 2 marginal zone, as well as of follicular, CD5+CD1dhi, B1 or type 1 transitional B cells, a majority of IL-10-producing B cells are located in the TIM-1+ subsets rather than the TIM-1− subsets. Nevertheless, expression of IL-10 and the cell surface marker TIM-1 is still not absolutely synchronous, which means it is not a specific marker for IL-10-producing B cells, let alone for Bregs.

The heterogeneity of Bregs subsets raises a critical question: are Bregs a distinct lineage where a specific factor controls the expression of genes responsible for their suppressive nature, or are they just the response of B cells to certain stimuli in a specific environment?2,14 The definition of B10 cells appears to support the former viewpoint because PMA and ionomycin are not able to initiate gene expression without the existence of appropriate transcription factors. Meanwhile, the majority of B cells cannot express IL-10 after the same stimulation17. However, these “existed factors” in B10 cells have not been identified, and the gene arrays of Bregs from mice and humans found no conclusive lineage-specific marker14,22,23. In addition, B10 cells require the stimulation of antigens or an inflammation environment, comparable to other Bregs subsets. The facts that immature B cells, mature B cells, and plasmablasts, as well as plasma cells could all function as Bregs14,24–26 and that B10 cells could inversely differentiate into antibody-secreting cells after terminating IL-10 production in vivo and in vitro27, further support the viewpoint that Bregs are not a distinct subset but the response of B cells to a specific environment, especially to inflammation.

Mechanisms for Bregs induction

If the hypothesis that Bregs acquire their regulatory ability in response to their environment is true, it is more important to determine the key mechanism that drives B cells to Bregs. Until now, some pathways have been confirmed to be necessary for Bregs induction in different settings (Fig. 1), but the entire scenario still remains mysterious.

Fig. 1. Bregs are induced through both “adaptive” and “innate” signals.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a B cells bind antigens through BCR, present them to cognate CD4+ T cells, become stimulated with CD40-CD40L, CD80/86-CD28, and IL-21, and then develop into Bregs. b LPS on TLR-2/4 and the DNA complex on TLR-9 can induce Bregs through the Myd88 pathway. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-α, help to induce Bregs. In addition, anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-35 also plays a role in Bregs induction through IL-12Rβ2 and IL-27Rα

Pro-inflammatory signals

Inflammation is regarded as the primary requisite14,28. In normal states, Bregs may remain at relatively low levels to maintain immunological homeostasis. By contrast, in response to inflammation, the amount of Bregs increases, and they acquire the ability to regulate immunity16,19. Antigen-B-cell receptor (BCR) is believed to be involved in one of the pathways for Bregs to detect an inflammatory signal and to elicit regulatory effects. In CD19-deficient mice (deficient in BCR signal transduction), inflammation worsens, whereas in mice with CD19 overexpression, inflammation is reduced16,29. In addition, the absence of CD22 increases the amount of Bregs by enhancing BCR signaling30. Moreover, BCR makes Bregs antigen specific20,31–33. In TgVH3B4 transgenic mice, whose VH is derived from an actin-reactive natural antibody, only immunization with actin significantly increases B10 cell quantities33. Meanwhile, after processing antigens, Bregs present them to cognate CD4+ T cells through major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and become stimulated via CD40L-CD40 and CD80/86-CD28 signaling pathways together with IL-2134–36. This indicates the importance of BCR signals and the interaction with cognate T cells for Bregs induction.

Another pathway involved in inflammation is the Toll-like receptor (TLR) for “innate type” signals37. The Gram-negative bacteria Salmonella typhimurium was found to directly induce IL-10 production by B cells in vitro via TLR-2/4 and the myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (Myd88) pathway37. Through TLR4, lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) stimulate splenic B cells to express a high level of FasL and TGF-β compared with the control38. In addition, LPS is also the routine constituent, together with PMA, ionomycin, and monensin, to induce IL-10 production in B10 cells16,19,39. TLR-9 is another receptor for detecting DNA-containing complexes on the surface of apoptotic cells, and it induces secretion of IL-10 in Bregs via MyD88 signaling20,40–42. The CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, which is abundant in microbial genomes and activates TLR-9, was also found to induce IL-10-producing B cells25,43.

In addition, other pro-inflammatory stimuli were reported. A proliferation-inducing ligand was found to induce IL-10-producing B cells through the transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) and the downstream signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway44. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells were reported to drive CD19+CD24hiCD38hi immature B cells into IL-10-producing Bregs via the release of interferon-α (IFN-α) and CD40 engagement24. In the arthritis mice, IL-1β and IL-6 induced Bregs differentiation and IL-10 production; by contrast, in mice lacking IL-6 receptor or IL-1β receptor specifically on B cells, Bregs were reduced45. IL-2 might also play a role to induce CD27intCD38+ plasmablasts that predominantly secreted IL-10, together with IL-6, IFN-α, and CpG46.

Anti-inflammatory signals

IL-35 is the only anti-inflammatory effector in the IL-12 family, which is critical for the regulation of T-cell-mediated autoimmunity22. Interestingly, this anti-inflammatory cytokine has also been shown to induce Bregs47. Wang et al. reported that recombinant IL-35 (rIL-35) could induce both IL-35-producing Bregs and IL-10-producing Bregs. With the stimulation of LPS and rIL-35, the IL-35-expressing population increased from 7.8 to 35.3%. Meanwhile, 17.8% of IL-35-producing Bregs co-expressed IL-10, whereas 53.6% of IL-10-producing Bregs also expressed IL-35. Further research on the mechanism of rIL-35 revealed that it functioned through the receptors of IL-12Rβ2 and IL-27Rα subunits on B cells and signaled through STAT1 and STAT3 but not STAT4 pathways47. These findings indicate that the induction of Bregs is not limited solely to inflammation.

Bregs functions and effectors

The central role of Bregs is to negatively regulate the immune system and help maintain immunological homeostasis. As shown in Fig. 2, multiple mechanisms are involved, including skewing T-cell differentiation, induction, and maintenance of Tregs, as well as suppression of pro-inflammatory cells2,14,17,28,48. Rosser et al. summarized the mechanisms into four patterns: cognate suppression, cell contact-mediated suppression, bystander suppression, and indirect suppression, which revealed the multiplicity and complexity of Bregs’ functions49. Based on the effectors, these functions can be divided into IL-10-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Fig. 2. Multiple mechanisms are involved in Bregs functions.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a Through cell contact and anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35, Bregs suppress CD4+ T-cell proliferation, induce Foxp3+ Tregs and Tr1 cells, and suppress Th1/17 differentiation and CD8+ effector T cells. b IL-10 and TGF-β secreted by Bregs hamper the antigen-presenting function and cytokine secretion of dendritic cells and M1 macrophages, and they possibly induce M2 macrophages. They also negatively regulate neutrophils and NK cells. c PD-L1 and FasL expressed on the surface of Bregs induce T-cell apoptosis through binding to PD-1 and Fas, respectively, together with cytokines IL-10 and IL-4

IL-10-dependent mechanism

IL-10 is considered the master negative regulator of inflammation and the key contributor of Bregs. IL-10 produced by CD5+CD1dhi B cells has been found to suppress T-cell-mediated inflammation. Adoptively transferring CD5+CD1dhi B cells from Il10-/- mice did not relieve inflammation, whereas those from the wild type did16. Mice selectively deficient in IL-10 expression of B cells (Il-10-/- B cell) could not recover from EAE, and the transferring of IL-10-producing B cells ameliorated EAE via suppression of the Th1 response36. Meanwhile, Carter et al. reported that Il-10-/- B-cell chimeric mice showed a significant decrease in Foxp3+ Tregs, and Il-10+/+ B cells induced more Foxp3+ Tregs than Il-10-/- B cells in response to antigen stimulation in vitro, which indicated that IL-10-producing B cells could induce Foxp3+ Tregs50. Moreover, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells were also reported as target cells regulated by B-cell-derived IL-1037,46,51–53. In humans, impairment of IL-10 production in Bregs could contribute to autoimmune diseases. The amounts of IL-10+CD19+ and IL-10+CD5+CD1d+ B cells, as well as the serum IL-10 concentration were significantly lower in Henoch–Schonlein purpura nephritis patients compared with healthy controls (HC); after treatment, they significantly increased. Meanwhile, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was also positively correlated with the amount of Bregs and the serum IL-10 concentration54. Although markers of Bregs might differ, a similar decrease or impairment of IL-10-producing B cells was also observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis44,55–57, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)24,55,58,59, multiple sclerosis26,55, systemic sclerosis60, Myasthenia Gravis61, and other autoimmune diseases. However, interestingly, only certain mechanisms of IL-10 function in a particular circumstance. This may lead to paradoxical results in different studies.

IL-10-independent mechanism

In addition to IL-10, IL-10-independent mechanisms have been well documented by recent studies4,13,62. IL-35 not only induces Bregs but also serves as an important effector of Bregs, which has a strong immunosuppressive effect47. In vitro, IL-35 inhibits the proliferation of B cells and T cells. In vivo, IL-35 treatment or adoptively transferring IL-35-induced Bregs ameliorates experimental autoimmune uveitis by inhibiting Th1/17 while inducing Tregs47. Similar results were confirmed in the model of EAE and Salmonella enterica infection22. These findings indicated that IL-35 played a unique role in Bregs effects, which contributed to forming a positive feedback network to downregulate the immune response.

TGF-β is another large family that suppresses inflammation over a wide range63. Tian et al. reported in 2001 that splenic B cells activated by LPS expressed high levels of TGF-β and FasL38. In vitro, these activated B cells inhibited the Th1 response, triggered apoptosis of splenic mononuclear cells, and impaired the function of antigen-presenting cells. In vivo, transfusion of activated B cells, rather than the control, inhibited spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Subsequently, a series of studies further demonstrated the individual function of TGF-β secreted by Bregs64–66. Among them, Bjarnadottir et al. reported that mice selectively deficient in TGF-β1 expression in B cells developed an earlier onset of EAE and presented with more severe central nervous system inflammation. This was related to augmented Th1/17 responses and increased myeloid dendritic cells64. In addition, TGF-β is known to induce Tregs. Human peripheral B cells activated by CpG could induce CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs through IL-10, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase enzyme and TGF-β. Blocking experiments with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) indicated that IL-10 and TGF-β had independent and complementary roles, respectively67. CD25hiCD27hiCD1dhiCD86hi Bregs in humans secreted both TGF-β and IL-10; however, the induction of Tregs and their expression of Foxp3 and CTLA-4 were dependent on TGF-β and cell–cell contact (perhaps via the CD86–CTLA-4 interaction)68.

The function of FasL and PD-L1 expressed on the surface of Bregs, which induces apoptosis through binding Fas and PD-1, respectively, on the target cells, has also been demonstrated69–72. These findings further explain the cell–cell contact dependent mechanism of Bregs.

Pan-B-cell depletion accelerates rejection in kidney transplantation

From the conventional perspective, B cells contribute to both acute and CR by presenting antigens to T cells and by producing cytokines and alloreactive antibodies8. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) produced by B cells bind to mismatched human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) or non-HLA molecules on the graft, initiate a set of signal events through complement-dependent and -independent pathways, recruit effector cells and finally lead to AMR. It is well recognized that AMR is the major cause of long-term graft loss. Therefore, B-cell research is focusing on avoiding the production of DSA and preventing AMR3. The pan-B-cell depletion strategy, which targets either B cells or plasma cells without discriminating effector or Bregs, including using anti-CD20 mAbs (rituximab and ofatumumab), anti-CD19 mAbs, anti-CD52 mAbs (alemtuzumab), proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib), and anti-thymocyte globulin, is believed to be useful for AMR treatment73–82.

However, this pan-B-cell depletion strategy does not work all of the time. Recently, a randomized, controlled trial comparing rituximab and daclizumab (anti-CD25 mAb) induction therapies in patients undergoing kidney transplantation was suspended because of a higher incidence of acute rejection in the rituximab group83. Both groups received two doses of induction at day 0 and day 7 (daclizumab, 1 mg/kg; rituximab, 10 mg/kg, together with 10 mg/kg methylprednisolone before rituximab) and underwent corticosteroid-free maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Although peripheral B cells were undetectable in all patients receiving rituximab, five of six patients had biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection in the first 3 months after transplantation, whereas only one of seven patients did in the daclizumab group (83% vs. 14%, P = 0.01). This revealed the existence of Bregs and their immune regulatory functions in kidney transplantation and highlighted the importance to discriminate Bregs from inflammatory B cells.

In addition, similar results were observed in transplantation models. Ding et al. reported that in the model of islet transplantation, depletion of B cells prior to transplantation with anti-CD20 mAbs slightly shortened allograft survival compared with B-cell-intact untreated mice (median survival time, MST, 10 days vs. 13 days). Surprisingly, anti-TIM-1 treatment accelerated allograft rejection in B-cell depletion recipients, whereas in B-cell-intact mice, this treatment significantly prolonged allograft survival through induction of Bregs (MST, 6 days vs. 28 days)18. In the costimulatory blockade-induced transplantation tolerance model, depletion of B cells 1 day after cardiac transplantation prevented tolerance and led to acute cellular rejection84. Anti-CD20 mAb treatment also enhanced allospecific T-cell response and accelerated skin allograft rejection85,86. Therefore, the effect of pan-B-cell depletion may depend on the timing of B-cell depletion. When the depletion is performed during the induction period, Bregs are eliminated, leading to an accelerated T-cell response and excess allograft rejection. By contrast, when performed in an AMR setting, it mainly affects effector B cells and may help attenuate rejection3,73.

Bregs contribute to tolerance in kidney transplantation

Further evidence regarding the critical role of Bregs in graft tolerance has been found in operationally tolerant (OT) patients. Although it is rare, a small group of kidney transplant individuals managed to maintain normal graft function after completely stopping immunosuppression. A widely recognized definition of operational tolerance is stable graft function without clinical features of CR in the absence of any immunosuppressive drugs for >1 year87. Analysis of peripheral blood cell phenotypes showed that OT patients were characterized by a higher absolute number and frequency of B cells compared with stable patients under immunosuppression (SI) and CR patients, and OT patients were comparable with the HC88,89. The main increase in B cells remained in the IgD-CD27+CD38+/- memory subset, as well as the IgD+CD38+ subset, and expression of CD80/86, CD40, CD62L, CD5, and CD1d increased compared with stable and CR patients88. More importantly, these B cells displayed inhibitory profiles, including a decrease in the FcγRIIA/FcγRIIB ratio, an increase in the B-cell scaffold protein with Ankyrin repeats 1 (BANK1), which negatively regulated CD40-mediated AKT activation, and an increase in TACI vs. the B lymphocyte-stimulating factor (BAFF) ratio88. These special characteristics prevented hyperactive B-cell response and skewed B cells to the regulatory side.

Concurrently, similar studies were performed by the immune tolerance network (ITN) and the indices of tolerance (IOT) to identify specific biomarkers of OT patients90,91. The ITN study recruited a cohort of 25 OT patients and showed that only the B-cell signature was significantly different between OT and SI groups. The same observation was seen between OT and HC groups. More specifically, OT patients had increased amounts of total B cells and naive B cells (CD27−IgD+IgM+) compared with SI patients90. When the researchers of ITN combined their patients with those from the IOT study and tested more surface markers, they found an increase in transitional B cells (CD38+CD24+IgD+), as well as total B cells and naive B cells in OT patients compared with the SI group90. The same result was confirmed in their recent study92. In addition, these transitional B cells expressed more IL-10 in the OT group relative to the SI or HC groups90. The increased amount of peripheral B cells in OT patients was also observed in the study performed by IOT; however, this was observed jointly with increased NK lymphocytes and decreased activated CD4+ T cells91. Analysis of B-cell subsets also showed an increase in transitional B cells and naive B cells with a memory pool decrease. The cytokine that mediated immune regulation was possibly TGF-β rather than IL-1091. Nevertheless, these studies revealed that increased B cells possessing immune regulatory capability contributed to the operational tolerance of kidney transplantation.

In addition to lymphocyte phenotypes, gene expression profiles of OT patients were analyzed, and they showed a close relationship with B cells. The ITN study reported that 22 of the 30 genes that had a twofold increase in OT vs. SI tested by microarrays were B-cell specific and were mainly involved in B-cell activation and differentiation. Next, when tested with the multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 31 of 228 genes were significantly different between the OT and SI groups (no difference between the OT and HC groups), and 26 of them were B-cell specific, which encoded κ/λ light chains of Ig. After linear discriminate analysis, IGKV4-1, IGLL1, and IGKV1D-13 were most predictive of tolerance, and these genes were related to transition, class switch, and receptor editing of B cells90. When six newly recruited OT patients were added in their recent study and genes were re-examined together with previous patients, IGLL1 and IGKV1D-13 were still significantly different between the OT and SI groups, and they remained relatively stable over time in OT patients. Particularly, the single most predictive gene IGKV1D-13 remained significantly different after correcting for total B cells; however, this was not observed for naive or transitional B-cell amounts, which suggested that naive and transitional B cells contributed to some portion of the alteration92. In the latest research using the expression of these two genes to predict tolerance in renal transplant patients, individuals consistently predicted to be tolerant had improved renal function, suggesting the potential protective function of Bregs93.

Essentially, B-cell subsets in human peripheral blood, including transitional B cells, memory B cells, and naive B cells, not only express IL-10 but also express pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) simultaneously. Among them, transitional B cells had the highest ratio of IL-10/TNF-α, which makes it the Bregs representative94. Interestingly, transitional B cells in kidney rejection patients expressed similar levels of IL-10 compared with those in stable patients; however, levels of TNF-α were much higher, which indicated that the immune regulatory function of transitional B cells should be characterized by the IL-10/TNF-α ratio. Moreover, the low IL-10/TNF-α ratio of transitional B cells was associated with poorer graft outcomes in a 3-year follow-up of patients with graft dysfunction94. A more recent study by the same group used the ratio of type 1 transitional B cells (T1) vs. type 2 transitional B cells (T2) alternatively because T1 expressed a higher IL-10/TNF-α ratio and it was easier to detect cell surface markers95. Validated in more kidney transplant patients and longer follow-up, the T1/T2 ratio served as an excellent predictor of graft dysfunction, even better than DSA95. In summary, these findings revealed that the characteristics and polarization profiles of Bregs in humans not only affected their immune regulatory functions but could also be an indicator for prognosis.

What can we expect for Bregs in the future?

Epigenetic regulation of Bregs

An abundance of research has confirmed the existence of Bregs over the last decade and highlighted their functions in tolerance induction, homeostasis maintenance, tumor metastasis, and infections. Although great progress has been achieved, the lack of the knowledge about the nature of Bregs is still an impediment to further research and applications. What specifically allows B cells to develop into Bregs? How are Bregs manipulated during development? Why could only a small population of B cells become Bregs under the same conditions? There is more to the answer than the hypothesis that Bregs are the response of B cells to inflammation (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Similar environments lead to opposite differentiation of B cells.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

B cells can develop into Bregs in response to inflammatory signals. However, similar environments can also activate B cells and stimulate them to become effector B cells. The direction of differentiation leads to a diametrically opposite consequence in kidney transplantation. Until now, determining factors still remain unknown

Identification of the factors that specifically make Bregs a distinct subset remains a critical and outstanding challenge. Because the surface markers are more related to the origin of B-cell subsets and the functional assay to detect intracellular cytokines (like IL-10) involves stimulation, fixation, and permeabilization, which is likely to alter the initial phenotype of B cells, transcription factors directly associated with regulatory function are suggested as better markers to identify Bregs96. In addition to BANK1 discussed above, IL-10-producing and IL-35-producing CD138hi plasma cells were found to co-express the transcription factor B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp1), which suppresses IL-6 secretion and distinguishes these cells from IL-10-producing CD1dhi B cells22. Foxp3 is another well-known transcription factor that causes conventional T cells to develop into Tregs and possess suppressive activity. Recent studies revealed that Foxp3 was also expressed in the human peripheral B-cell population, which is related to milk allergy and rheumatoid arthritis97,98. Further research showed that LPS or IgM mAbs stimulation induced the expression of Foxp3 in more than 10% of CD19+ B cells, and CD19+Foxp3+ B cells suppressed proliferation of responder T cells via cell–cell contact. In vivo, adoptively transferred Foxp3-tranfected B cells inhibited autoimmune arthritis in mice through suppression of Th17 and induction of Tregs99. Although the origins, the surface markers or the effectors of Foxp3+ Bregs remain unclear, these results bring new insights into the future research of Bregs. Is Foxp3+ a common transcription factor expressed in different subsets of Bregs? How is Foxp3 expression regulated in Bregs and how does it work? Is there a specific gene region similar to the Treg-specific demethylated region in Bregs? Are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, or ubiquitination of certain genes and histones involved in the development and function of Bregs? Future research regarding epigenetics may help to better understand the nature of Bregs.

Additionally, microRNA (miRNA) appears to play a role in this complex network through gene expression regulation. MiR-142-3p miRNA was overexpressed in OT patients, particularly in the total B-cell population. This miRNA remained stable over time and affected nearly 1000 gene transcriptions, including key B-cell-related genes like BANK1 and MS4A1 (CD20)100. The broad range of gene networks affected was due to the incomplete pattern of miRNA target recognition. Whether this miRNA helps induce Bregs requires further research.

Crosstalk between Bregs and other immune regulatory cells

There has been solid evidence that Bregs could induce different subsets of Tregs; however, little is known regarding their relationship with other immune regulatory cells. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a newly identified population of regulatory cells, which are often expanded under pathologic conditions and suppress immune response101. Recent research reported that MDSCs could induce IL-10-producing B cells via inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in vitro and ameliorate autoimmunity in a murine model of SLE via expansion of Bregs and reduction of effector B cells102. However, how iNOS influenced B-cell differentiation was not elucidated. Exogenous IL-10 was reported to induce M2 macrophages in the model of myocardial infarction103; however, whether Bregs could induce differentiation and polarization of macrophages is unknown. Crosstalk between Bregs and regulatory dendritic cells or natural killer cells is also an interesting field awaiting exploration.

Bregs-based cell therapy in kidney transplantation

Cell therapy is a novel promising method to promote tolerance in kidney transplantation. The ONE Study (www.onestudy.org) is a multicenter phase I/II clinical trial trying to develop immunoregulatory cell products for human organ transplantation. Currently, several trials based on Tregs are recruiting patients. Unlike Tregs, there is no clinical trial using Bregs for cell therapy, although it has been proven effective in some animal models. The main concerns lie in the lack of knowledge on Bregs induction, expansion, maintenance, and function. Before clinical application, a highly efficient induction protocol needs to be developed, and a Bregs-specific marker needs to be identified for selection. Meanwhile, it is also a critical challenge to keep Bregs stable and reduce possible risks of side effects. Therefore, there is still a long way to go before clinical application of Bregs-based therapy.

Concluding remarks

Rapidly emerging evidence confirms the existence of Bregs and designates them as a new member of the immunosuppressive cell club. A variety of Bregs subsets have been identified, and multiple pathways and effectors are involved. Particularly in kidney transplantation, we should consider the “B side” when we are pursuing immune tolerance: on one side, B cells produce alloantibodies and lead to AMR and even graft loss; on the other side, B cells display immune regulatory functions and help induce tolerance. At present, the B-cell signature may help identify tolerant patients to minimize immunosuppressive regimens or to conduct drug withdrawals. In the future, B-cell-based cell therapy may be available for tolerance induction along with a better understanding of Bregs.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81771722 to Y.M., and grants 81400752 and 81770746 to C.Y.).

Author’s contributions

C.Y. and B.P. conceived and designed the review. B.P. collected, analyzed literatures, and wrote the draft. C.Y. and Y.M. helped to revise the language. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Edited by Y. Wang.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yingzi Ming, Phone: +86 731 88618036, Email: myz_china@aliyun.com.

Cheng Yang, Phone: +86 21 64041990, Email: esuperyc@163.com, Email: yang.cheng1@zs-hospital.sh.cn.

References

  • 1.Sellares J, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am. J. Transplant. 2012;12:388–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carreras-Planella L, Borras FE, Franquesa M. Tolerance in kidney transplantation: what is on the B side? Mediat. Inflamm. 2016;2016:8491956. doi: 10.1155/2016/8491956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nouel A, Simon Q, Jamin C, Pers JO, Hillion S. Regulatory B cells: an exciting target for future therapeutics in transplantation. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:11. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ray A, Dittel BN. Mechanisms of regulatory B cell function in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases beyond IL-10. J. Clin. Med. 2017;6:1. doi: 10.3390/jcm6010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fillatreau S. Regulatory roles of B cells in infectious diseases. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2016;34:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen M, Sun Q, Wang J, Pan W, Ren X. Positive and negative functions of B lymphocytes in tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7:55828–55839. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chong A. S. & Khiew S. H. Transplantation tolerance: don’t forget about the B cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 189, 171-180 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Karahan GE, Claas FH, Heidt S. B cell immunity in solid organ transplantation. Front. Immunol. 2016;7:686. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Neta R, Salvin SB. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 1974. Specific suppression of delayed hypersensitivity: the possible presence of a suppressor B cell in the regulation of delayed hypersensitivity; pp. 1716–1725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Smith RN, Preffer FI, Bhan AK. Suppressive role of B cells in chronic colitis of T-cell receptor alpha mutant mice. J. Exp. Med. 1997;186:1749–1756. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.10.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wolf SD, Dittel BN, Hardardottir F, Janeway CA., Jr. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in genetically B cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:2271–2278. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.6.2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mizoguchi E, Mizoguchi A, Preffer FI, Bhan AK. Regulatory role of mature B cells in a murine model of inflammatory bowel disease. Int. Immunol. 2000;12:597–605. doi: 10.1093/intimm/12.5.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Floudas A, Amu S, Fallon PG. New insights into IL-10 dependent and IL-10 independent mechanisms of regulatory B cell immune suppression. J. Clin. Immunol. 2016;36 Suppl 1:25–33. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0263-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rosser EC, Mauri C. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity. 2015;42:607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ding T, Yan F, Cao S, Ren X. Regulatory B cell: new member of immunosuppressive cell club. Hum. Immunol. 2015;76:615–621. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yanaba K, et al. A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5 + phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. Immunity. 2008;28:639–650. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lykken JM, Candando KM, Tedder TF. Regulatory B10 cell development and function. Int. Immunol. 2015;27:471–477. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ding Q, et al. Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:3645–3656. doi: 10.1172/JCI46274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Matsushita T, Tsubata T, Tedder TF. The development and function of regulatory B cells expressing IL-10 (B10 cells) requires antigen receptor diversity and TLR signals. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2009;182:7459–7472. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miles K, et al. A tolerogenic role for Toll-like receptor 9 is revealed by B-cell interaction with DNA complexes expressed on apoptotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:887–892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109173109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu J, et al. IL-10-producing B cells are induced early in HIV-1 infection and suppress HIV-1-specific T cell responses. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shen P, et al. IL-35-producing B cells are critical regulators of immunity during autoimmune and infectious diseases. Nature. 2014;507:366–370. doi: 10.1038/nature12979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van de Veen W, et al. IgG4 production is confined to human IL-10-producing regulatory B cells that suppress antigen-specific immune responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013;131:1204–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Menon M, Blair PA, Isenberg DA, Mauri C. A regulatory feedback between plasmacytoid dendritic cells and regulatory B cells is aberrant in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2016;44:683–697. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lenert P, Brummel R, Field EH, Ashman RF. TLR-9 activation of marginal zone B cells in lupus mice regulates immunity through increased IL-10 production. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005;25:29–40. doi: 10.1007/s10875-005-0355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Duddy M, et al. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2007;178:6092–6099. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maseda D, et al. Regulatory B10 cells differentiate into antibody-secreting cells after transient IL-10 production in vivo. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2012;188:1036–1048. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mizoguchi A, Bhan AK. A case for regulatory B cells. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2006;176:705–710. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matsushita T, Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Fujimoto M, Tedder TF. Regulatory B cells inhibit EAE initiation in mice while other B cells promote disease progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118:3420–3430. doi: 10.1172/JCI36030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tedder TF, Poe JC, Haas KM. CD22: a multifunctional receptor that regulates B lymphocyte survival and signal transduction. Adv. Immunol. 2005;88:1–50. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(05)88001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bankoti R, Gupta K, Levchenko A, Stager S. Marginal zone B cells regulate antigen-specific T cell responses during infection. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2012;188:3961–3971. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Singh A, et al. Regulatory role of B cells in a murine model of allergic airway disease. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2008;180:7318–7326. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang J, et al. Positive selection of B10 cells is determined by BCR specificity and signaling strength. Cell. Immunol. 2016;304-305:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2016.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lemoine S, Morva A, Youinou P, Jamin C. Human T cells induce their own regulation through activation of B cells. J. Autoimmun. 2011;36:228–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yoshizaki A, et al. Regulatory B cells control T-cell autoimmunity through IL-21-dependent cognate interactions. Nature. 2012;491:264–268. doi: 10.1038/nature11501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:944–950. doi: 10.1038/ni833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Neves P, et al. Signaling via the MyD88 adaptor protein in B cells suppresses protective immunity during Salmonella typhimurium infection. Immunity. 2010;33:777–790. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tian J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-activated B cells down-regulate Th1 immunity and prevent autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2001;167:1081–1089. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matsushita T, Tedder TF. Identifying regulatory B cells (B10 cells) that produce IL-10 in mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;677:99–111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-869-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gray M, Miles K, Salter D, Gray D, Savill J. Apoptotic cells protect mice from autoimmune inflammation by the induction of regulatory B cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14080–14085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700326104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lampropoulou V, et al. TLR-activated B cells suppress T cell-mediated autoimmunity. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2008;180:4763–4773. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Christensen SR, et al. Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity. 2006;25:417–428. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sun CM, Deriaud E, Leclerc C, Lo-Man R. Upon TLR9 signaling, CD5 + B cells control the IL-12-dependent Th1-priming capacity of neonatal DCs. Immunity. 2005;22:467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hua C, et al. A proliferation inducing ligand (APRIL) promotes IL-10 production and regulatory functions of human B cells. J. Autoimmun. 2016;73:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rosser EC, et al. Regulatory B cells are induced by gut microbiota-driven interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 production. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1334–1339. doi: 10.1038/nm.3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Matsumoto M, et al. Interleukin-10-producing plasmablasts exert regulatory function in autoimmune inflammation. Immunity. 2014;41:1040–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang RX, et al. Interleukin-35 induces regulatory B cells that suppress autoimmune disease. Nat. Med. 2014;20:633–641. doi: 10.1038/nm.3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mauri C, Bosma A. Immune regulatory function of B cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:221–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rosser EC, Blair PA, Mauri C. Cellular targets of regulatory B cell-mediated suppression. Mol. Immunol. 2014;62:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Carter NA, et al. Mice lacking endogenous IL-10-producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2011;186:5569–5579. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maseda D, et al. Peritoneal cavity regulatory B cells (B10 cells) modulate IFN-gamma + CD4 + T cell numbers during colitis development in mice. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2013;191:2780–2795. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Matsushita T, Horikawa M, Iwata Y, Tedder TF. Regulatory B cells (B10 cells) and regulatory T cells have independent roles in controlling experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis initiation and late-phase immunopathogenesis. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2010;185:2240–2252. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schuetz C, et al. Regulatory B cell-dependent islet transplant tolerance is also natural killer cell dependent. Am. J. Transplant. 2017;17:1656–1662. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu X, et al. A lower proportion of regulatory B cells in patients with Henoch-Schoenlein purpura nephritis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Iwata Y, et al. Characterization of a rare IL-10-competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. Blood. 2011;117:530–541. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Flores-Borja F, et al. CD19 + CD24hiCD38hi B cells maintain regulatory T cells while limiting TH1 and TH17 differentiation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:173ra123. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Daien CI, et al. Regulatory B10 cells are decreased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and are inversely correlated with disease activity. Arthritis Rheumatol. (Hoboken, NJ) 2014;66:2037–2046. doi: 10.1002/art.38666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Blair PA, et al. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Immunity. 2010;32:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Heinemann K, et al. Decreased IL-10(+) regulatory B cells (Bregs) in lupus nephritis patients. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 2016;45:312–316. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1126346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Aravena O, et al. TIM-1 defines a human regulatory B cell population that is altered in frequency and function in systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:8. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1213-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang Y, et al. CD19 + Tim-1 + B cells are decreased and negatively correlated with disease severity in Myasthenia Gravis patients. Immunol. Res. 2016;64:1216–1224. doi: 10.1007/s12026-016-8872-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ray A, Wang L, Dittel BN. IL-10-independent regulatory B-cell subsets and mechanisms of action. Int. Immunol. 2015;27:531–536. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fujio K, et al. Revisiting the regulatory roles of the TGF-beta family of cytokines. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016;15:917–922. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bjarnadottir K, et al. B cell-derived transforming growth factor-beta1 expression limits the induction phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:34594. doi: 10.1038/srep34594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lee KM, et al. TGF-beta-producing regulatory B cells induce regulatory T cells and promote transplantation tolerance. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:1728–1736. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Natarajan P, et al. Regulatory B cells from hilar lymph nodes of tolerant mice in a murine model of allergic airway disease are CD5 + , express TGF-beta, and co-localize with CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5:691–701. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nouel A, et al. B-Cells induce regulatory T cells through TGF-beta/IDO production in A CTLA-4 dependent manner. J. Autoimmun. 2015;59:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kessel A, et al. Human CD19(+)CD25(high) B regulatory cells suppress proliferation of CD4(+) T cells and enhance Foxp3 and CTLA-4 expression in T-regulatory cells. Autoimmun. Rev. 2012;11:670–677. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bodhankar S, Galipeau D, Vandenbark AA, Offner H. PD-1 interaction with PD-L1 but not PD-L2 on B-cells mediates protective effects of estrogen against EAE. J. Clin. Cell Immunol. 2013;4:143. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Khan AR, et al. PD-L1hi B cells are critical regulators of humoral immunity. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:5997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lundy SK, Fox DA. Reduced Fas ligand-expressing splenic CD5 + B lymphocytes in severe collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009;11:R128. doi: 10.1186/ar2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schaut RG, et al. Regulatory IgDhi B cells suppress T cell function via IL-10 and PD-L1 during progressive visceral leishmaniasis. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2016;196:4100–4109. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Clatworthy MR. Targeting B cells and antibody in transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2011;11:1359–1367. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03554.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Coelho V, Saitovitch D, Kalil J, Silva HM. Rethinking the multiple roles of B cells in organ transplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2013;18:13–21. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32835c8043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vo AA, et al. Use of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89:1095–1102. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d21e7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fehr T, et al. Rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of chronic antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2009;87:1837–1841. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a6bac5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zarkhin V, Chalasani G, Sarwal MM. The Yin and Yang of B cells in graft rejection and tolerance. Transplant. Rev. (Orlando). 2010;24:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ciancio G, et al. Randomized trial of rATg/Daclizumab vs. rATg/Alemtuzumab as dual induction therapy in renal transplantation: results at 8 years of follow-up. Transpl. Immunol. 2017;40:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Welberry Smith MP, et al. Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation permits safe steroid avoidance with tacrolimus monotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Transplantation. 2013;96:1082–1088. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a64db9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang X, Huang H, Han S, Fu S, Wang L. Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systemic review. Transpl. Immunol. 2012;27:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2012.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hanaway MJ, et al. Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:1909–1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Farney AC, et al. A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus antithymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;88:810–819. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b4acfb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Clatworthy MR, et al. B-cell-depleting induction therapy and acute cellular rejection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2683–2685. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0808481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lal G, et al. Interleukin-10 from marginal zone precursor B-cell subset is required for costimulatory blockade-induced transplantation tolerance. Transplantation. 2015;99:1817–1828. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Marino J, et al. B cell depletion with an anti-CD20 antibody enhances alloreactive memory T cell responses after transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2016;16:672–678. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.DiLillo DJ, et al. B lymphocytes differentially influence acute and chronic allograft rejection in mice. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2011;186:2643–2654. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Roussey-Kesler G, et al. Clinical operational tolerance after kidney transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2006;6:736–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pallier A, et al. Patients with drug-free long-term graft function display increased numbers of peripheral B cells with a memory and inhibitory phenotype. Kidney Int. 2010;78:503–513. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Louis S, et al. Contrasting CD25hiCD4 + T cells/FOXP3 patterns in chronic rejection and operational drug-free tolerance. Transplantation. 2006;81:398–407. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000203166.44968.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Newell KA, et al. Identification of a B cell signature associated with renal transplant tolerance in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:1836–1847. doi: 10.1172/JCI39933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sagoo P, et al. Development of a cross-platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:1848–1861. doi: 10.1172/JCI39922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Newell KA, et al. Longitudinal studies of a B cell-derived signature of tolerance in renal transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:2908–2920. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Asare, A. et al. B cell receptor genes associated with tolerance identify a cohort of immunosuppressed patients with improved renal allograft graft function. Am. J. Transplant. 17, 2627–2639 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 94.Cherukuri A, et al. Immunologic human renal allograft injury associates with an altered IL-10/TNF-alpha expression ratio in regulatory B cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;25:1575–1585. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013080837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cherukuri A, et al. Reduced human transitional B cell T1/T2 ratio is associated with subsequent deterioration in renal allograft function. Kidney Int. 2017;91:183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gorosito Serran M, et al. The regulatory role of B cells in autoimmunity, infections and cancer: perspectives beyond IL10 production. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:3362–3369. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Noh J, Noh G, Kim HS, Kim AR, Choi WS. Allergen-specific responses of CD19(+)CD5(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory B cells (Bregs) and CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell (Tregs) in immune tolerance of cow milk allergy of late eczematous reactions. Cell. Immunol. 2012;274:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Guo Y, Zhang X, Qin M, Wang X. Changes in peripheral CD19(+)Foxp3(+) and CD19(+)TGFbeta(+) regulatory B cell populations in rheumatoid arthritis patients with interstitial lung disease. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015;7:471–477. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.02.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Park MK, et al. Amelioration of autoimmune arthritis by adoptive transfer of Foxp3-expressing regulatory B cells is associated with the Treg/Th17 cell balance. J. Transl. Med. 2016;14:191. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0940-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Danger R, et al. Upregulation of miR-142-3p in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of operationally tolerant patients with a renal transplant. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012;23:597–606. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011060543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kong YY, Fuchsberger M, Xiang SD, Apostolopoulos V, Plebanski M. Myeloid derived suppressor cells and their role in diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013;20:1437–1444. doi: 10.2174/0929867311320110006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Park MJ, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce the expansion of regulatory B cells and ameliorate autoimmunity in the sanroque mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (Hoboken, NJ) 2016;68:2717–2727. doi: 10.1002/art.39767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jung M, et al. IL-10 improves cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction by stimulating M2 macrophage polarization and fibroblast activation. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2017;112:33. doi: 10.1007/s00395-017-0622-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Evans JG, et al. Novel suppressive function of transitional 2 B cells in experimental arthritis. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2007;178:7868–7878. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Blair PA, et al. Selective targeting of B cells with agonistic anti-CD40 is an efficacious strategy for the generation of induced regulatory T2-like B cells and for the suppression of lupus in MRL/lpr mice. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, MD: 1950) 2009;182:3492–3502. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Yeung MY, et al. TIM-1 signaling is required for maintenance and induction of regulatory B cells. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15:942–953. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liu Y, et al. IL-10-producing regulatory B-cells suppressed effector T-cells but enhanced regulatory T-cells in chronic HBV infection. Clin. Sci. (London) 2016;130:907–919. doi: 10.1042/CS20160069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES