Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2017 Sep 13;153(1):84–86. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3142

Humanitarian Surgical Care in the US Military Treatment Facilities in Afghanistan From 2002 to 2013

Sharon R Weeks 1, John S Oh 1, Eric A Elster 2, Peter A Learn 2,
PMCID: PMC5833623  PMID: 28903140

Abstract

This study uses the database Patient Administration Systems and Biostatistics Activity to examine the breadth of war-related and non–war-related surgical procedures provided by deployed military surgeons to locals in Afghanistan from 2002 to 2013.


Medical units of the US military have operated for more than 15 years in Afghanistan, a country with among the lowest estimates of access to safe, timely surgical and anesthesia care. Surgeons from the US military have delivered humanitarian surgical care (HSC) to local national civilians throughout the conflict, although previous large reports about this care focused on children. To provide a more comprehensive accounting, we conducted a retrospective study on HSC provided by deployed US military medical units to local national civilians during the Afghanistan conflict.

Methods

The Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Department of Research Programs determined that this study was exempt from review by an institutional review board and did not require participant consent as all records received and analyzed by investigators were deidentified. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Data were collected from January 1, 2002, to March 21, 2013, and data analysis took place from July 1, 2015, to March 1, 2016.

We queried the Patient Administration Systems and Biostatistics Activity, a military medicine administrative database, for noncombatant local national patients older than 15 years of age who underwent at least 1 surgical procedure (according to procedure codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] Volume 3) in military treatment facilities in Afghanistan from January 1, 2002 to March 21, 2013. Our analysis excluded ICD-9 procedure codes 87 to 99, miscellaneous procedures. Patient demographics, nature of disease and injury, blood transfusions, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were included. We examined patient subgroups according to their war-related (WR) or non–war-related (NWR) classification, which is based on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Standardization Agreement 2050, a trauma code system that specifies cause of injury as WR or NWR. Admitting facilities determined an injury or condition to be WR if it occurred as a direct consequence of the conflict, including acute and chronic sequelae. We characterized treatment or care according to the World Bank 2015 Disease Control Priorities, which identified 44 essential surgical procedures.

Results

From January 1, 2002, to March 21, 2013, a total of 5786 local national civilians underwent 9428 surgical procedures, accounting for 37 121 inpatient days. Of these patients, 4680 (80.9%) were male and 2853 (49.3%) were treated for NWR conditions. Compared with patients who had WR injuries, patients with NWR conditions were older (median [interquartile range] age, 26 [22-35] years vs 29 [22-40] years; P < .001) and had shorter lengths of stay (4 [2-9] days vs 3 [1-6] days; P < .001), fewer procedures (4859 vs 4569), lower blood transfusion requirements (943 [32.2%] vs 363 [12.7%]; P < .001), and lower in-hospital mortality (150 [5.11%] vs 104 [3.64%]; P = .006) (Table 1). Most NWR presentations were due to injury, but 1104 (38.7%) of these patients underwent elective or noninjury procedures.

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Local National Patients Who Received Humanitarian Surgical Care.

Characteristic Patients Who Received War-Related Procedures
(N = 2933)
Patients Who Received Non–War-Related Procedures
(N = 2853)
P Value
Age, median (IQR), y 26 (22-35) 29 (22-40) <.001a
Length of stay, median (IQR), d 4 (2-9) 3 (1-6) <.001a
Total inpatient patient-days, d 23 004 14 117 NA
Procedures, Total No. 4859 4569 NA
Procedures, median (IQR), No. 2 (1-5) 2 (1-3) <.001a
Required blood transfusion, No. (%) 943 (32.2) 363 (12.7) <.001b
In-hospital mortality, No. (%) 150 (5.11) 104 (3.64) .006b

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable.

a

Calculated by Mann-Whitney test.

b

Calculated by Pearson χ2 test.

When analyzed by organ system (Table 2), the most commonly performed procedures were on the musculoskeletal and integumentary systems, with patients with WR and NWR injuries undergoing procedures at similar rates (musculoskeletal, 1446 [29.8%] vs 1464 [32.0%]; integumentary, 1313 [27.0%] vs 922 [20.2%]). Noninjured patients had lower rates (musculoskeletal, 398 [24.0%]; integumentary, 233 [14.1%]; P < .001) but were more likely to undergo procedures associated with the digestive system or the eyes (421 [25.4%] and 144 [8.7%], respectively; P < .001).

Table 2. Data on Humanitarian Surgical Care Procedures Performeda.

Type of Procedure Procedure, No. (%)
Total WR NWR
Performed by ICD-9 category
Nervous system 581 307 (6.3) 274 (6.0)
Endocrine system 109 24 (0.5) 85 (1.9)
Eye 498 232 (4.8) 266 (5.8)
Ear 63 24 (0.5) 39 (0.9)
Nose, mouth, and pharynx 182 80 (1.65) 102 (2.2)
Respiratory system 670 394 (8.1) 276 (6.0)
Cardiovascular system 393 223 (4.6) 170 (3.7)
Hemic and lymphatic system 69 37 (0.8) 32 (0.7)
Digestive system 1361 634 (13.0) 727 (16.0)
Urinary system 248 97 (2.0) 151 (3.3)
Male genital organs 78 46 (1.0) 32 (0.7)
Female genital organs 22 2 (0.04) 20 (0.4)
Obstetrical procedures 9 0 9 (0.2)
Musculoskeletal system 2910 1446 (29.8) 1464 (32.0)
Integumentary system 2235 1313 (27.0) 922 (20.2)
Total 9428 4859 4569
World Bank DCP essential surgical procedures
General surgical (n = 322)
Hernia repair 83 5 (0.3) 78 (4.7)
Relief of urinary obstruction 80 29 (1.7) 51 (3.1)
Appendectomy 65 0 (0) 65 (3.9)
Colostomy 58 30 (1.8) 28 (1.7)
Gallbladder disease 36 3 (0.2) 33 (2.0)
Visual impairment
Cataract extraction 126 17 (1.0) 109 (6.6)
Nontrauma orthopedic
Debridement of osteomyelitis 53 12 (0.7) 41 (2.5)
Injury (n = 2762)
Skin grafting 258 115 (6.8) 143 (8.6)
Escharotomy/fasciotomy 53 32 (1.9) 21 (1.3)
Fracture reduction 931 487 (28.9) 444 (26.7)
Trauma-related amputation 340 230 (13.7) 110 (6.6)
Irrigation and debridement of open fracture 309 195 (11.6) 114 (6.9)
Placement of external fixator 215 126 (7.5) 89 (5.4)
Tube thoracostomy 210 124 (7.4) 86 (5.2)
Trauma laparotomy 173 114 (6.8) 59 (3.6)
Surgical airway 173 97 (5.8) 76 (4.6)
Decompressive craniotomy 100 46 (2.7) 54 (3.3)
Other DCP procedures 82 22 (1.3) 60 (3.6)
Total 3345 1684 1661

Abbreviations: DCP, Disease Control Priorities; HSC, humanitarian surgical care; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; NWR, non–war-related; WR, war-related.

a

In-column percentages reported.

Disease Control Priorities essential surgical procedures accounted for 3345 procedures (Table 2), and 583 (17.4%) procedures were performed for noninjury conditions. Traumatic injuries accounted for an additional 2762 surgical procedures (82.6%), most frequently orthopedic procedures for fractures (1455 [43.5%]). The essential procedures accounted for 1684 of 4859 WR procedures performed (34.7%) and 1661 of 4569 of NWR procedures performed (36.4%).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this report is the largest, most comprehensive account of HSC provided to local national civilians by US military medical units in Afghanistan. Injured patients received most of the procedures, which is consistent with the high burden of trauma in low- and middle-income countries. This report also shows the significant resources committed to noninjury and elective conditions. The procedures included those that are unexpected for combat-oriented medical units to perform (such as cataract surgery), reflecting the expertise and logistical support available in these units. Although the outcomes of the procedures or follow-up after discharge could provide valuable perspective, the data set limited our ability to characterize these elements.

The scope of HSC that can be delivered by a military medical unit is influenced by the complex interplay of capacity, humanitarian drive, operational tempo, strategic goals, and relationships with local governmental and nongovernmental medical resources. Eligibility and access to HSC varied widely by location, time frame, and cultural limitations. Our findings encourage continued discussion about the goals of and eligibility for military HSC. Who should be treated, and how do we integrate with the local health system? How should we prepare surgeons for deployment given that global surgery, as well as military trauma, is part of the deployed surgeon’s practice? These remain pressing questions for the current and future conflicts into which military surgeons are deployed.

References

  • 1.Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(6):e316-e323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Edwards MJ, Lustik M, Burnett MW, Eichelberger M. Pediatric inpatient humanitarian care in combat: Iraq and Afghanistan 2002 to 2012. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):1018-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edwards MJ, Lustik M, Eichelberger MR, Elster E, Azarow K, Coppola C. Blast injury in children: an analysis from Afghanistan and Iraq, 2002-2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):1278-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Agency for Standardization Agreement Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death. Brussels, Belgium: North Atlantic Treaty Organization; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN. Disease Control Priorities, Vol 1: Essential Surgery. 3rd ed Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Surgery are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES