Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2018 Feb 15;9(3):273. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0337-z

Knockout of zebrafish interleukin 7 receptor (IL7R) by the CRISPR/Cas9 system delays retinal neurodevelopment

Shijiao Cai 1,2, Yang Chen 1, Yue Shang 1, Jianlin Cui 1,3, Zongjin Li 1, Yuhao Li 1,3,
PMCID: PMC5833684  PMID: 29449560

Abstract

Interleukin 7 receptor (il7r), a transmembrane receptor, belongs to the type I cytokine receptor family. Il7r is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, such as multiple sclerosis. Targeted knockdown of il7r leads to delayed myelination, highlighting the potential role of il7r in the development of the nervous system. Zebrafish is an ideal model for the study of neurogenesis; moreover, the il7r gene is highly conserved between zebrafish and human. The aim of the present study was to investigate the novel function of il7r in neurogenesis. First, an il7r −/− homozygous mutant line was generated by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology. Second, the gross development of il7r−/− mutants revealed remarkably smaller eyes and delayed retinal neurodifferentiation. Third, microarray analysis revealed that genes associated with the phototransduction signalling pathway were strongly down-regulated in il7r −/− mutants. Finally, the results from behavioural tests indicated that visual function was impaired in il7r −/− mutant larvae. Overall, our data demonstrate that a lack of il7r retards the development of the retina. Thus, il7r is an essential molecule for maintaining normal retinal development in zebrafish.

Introduction

Interleukin 7 (IL7) is a cytokine produced by bone marrow and stromal cells of the thymus1. The IL7 receptor (IL7R) is a heterodimer formed by the specific IL7R alpha chain (IL7Rα) and common gamma chain (γc), which is shared by other cytokine receptors, such as IL2, IL4, IL9, IL15, and IL21. When IL7 binds to IL7R, IL7R/IL7Rα-γc activates its downstream pathways, including JAK/STAT, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and SOS/Ras/ERK2. Il7r plays a vital role in maintaining the development and homoeostasis of T-lineage and B-lineage cells3,4. Lack of il7r contributes to some haematological or immunological disorders, such as T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and severe combined immunodeficiency5,6. In recent years, more attention has been paid to the correlation between il7r and neurodegenerative diseases. Il7r is involved in the pathogenesis of demyelination in both patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and animal models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis710. A previous study in our lab revealed that il7r is an essential molecule for myelination. Interestingly, temporary deficiency of il7r caused smaller eyes in a zebrafish model11. This finding highlights the importance of exploring the potential impact of il7r on neurogenesis.

In the past few decades, three revolutionary genome-editing techniques, including zinc finger nuclease, transcription activator-like effector nuclease and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated (CRISPR/Cas), have been developed1214. CRISPR/Cas systems are adaptive immune systems that protect bacteria and archaea against invasive viruses and plasmid DNA and are considered a third-generation genome-editing tool15,16. The three types of CRISPR/Cas systems are type I, type II and type III17. Type II CRISPR/Cas9 is the simplest system and merely composed of endonuclease Cas9 and single-guide RNA (sgRNA). Cas9 is guided by sgRNA to mediate site-specific recognition and double-strand breaks. sgRNA is the only element required for each genomic target, thus dramatically simplifying design and increasing efficiency18,19. Therefore, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been widely used as an effective and precise way to modify genes.

In this study, an il7r−/− mutant zebrafish line was generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to investigate the effect of the il7r gene on retinal development. Based on this zebrafish model, we determined the following properties: (1) gross development and neuronal differentiation of il7r−/− mutants; (2) gene expression profiles, gene ontology (GO) and signalling pathway analysis and possible mechanisms following il7r knockout; and (3) behavioural changes, including movement and visual activity of il7r−/− mutants. Our study might help to broaden our view of the novel function of the il7r gene in neuronal development.

Results

CRISPR/Cas9 system generates a targeted mutation of il7r

In this study, we designed and generated a sgRNA targeting exon 5 of the il7r gene (Fig. 1a). F1 fish were generated by the self-cross of F0. We identified the genotype and found the deletion of four base pairs (bp) in F1 heterozygotes (Fig. 1b). This mutation led to a truncation of IL7R protein, which contained only 204 amino acids and lacked a transmembrane helix (Fig. 1c). The PCR results from wild-type (WT), heterozygous and homozygous larvae are shown in Fig. 2a. Compared with WT larvae (Fig. 2b), heterozygous larvae exhibited double peaks at the site of ACTG (Fig. 2c; black frame). However, homozygous larvae (Fig. 2d) showed a 4-bp deletion (site of ACTG, black frames in Fig. 2b, c). Moreover, there were no double peaks in the sequencing map, which was consistent with the PCR results. Since the CRISPR/Cas9 system has potential off-target effects, we analysed the top ten sites by a PCR assay and Sanger sequencing in homozygotes20,21. All the ten potential sites showed the same sequences as WT fish without double peaks (Supplementary Figure 1). Therefore, no detectable off-target effect was found in F2 il7r−/− mutants.

Fig. 1. Generation of il7r mutant zebrafish with the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Fig. 1

a Diagram of the target site in the zebrafish il7r genome. b Sequence alignment between WT and il7r−/− mutant. c The predicted truncation of IL7R protein

Fig. 2. Identification of il7r−/− homozygotes in F2 zebrafish.

Fig. 2

a PCR amplification of wild-type (#1), heterozygous (#2) and homozygous (#3) zebrafish. b-d Sequencing maps of wild-type (b), heterozygous (c) and homozygous (d) zebrafish. Red frames: sequences of the target site. Black frames: ACTG base pairs in wild-type and heterozygous zebrafish. Note the 4-bp (ACTG) deletion in homozygotes

For the il7r−/− mutant line, two approaches were used to verify reliability. First, we examined the expression of IL7R protein by western blotting. No IL7R protein was detected in il7r−/− larvae (Fig. 3a). Second, we performed whole-mount in situ hybridisation at 4 days post fertilisation (dpf) with growth hormone 1 (gh1) and recombination activating gene 1 (rag1) mRNA probes, which label the hypophysis and thymus, respectively22. In zebrafish, il7r deficiency leads to the absence of lymphocytes in the thymus rather than in the hypophysis3. Gh1 signals were detected in the hypophysis from both WT and il7r−/− larvae (Fig. 3b, arrowheads), and no significant difference was found in the area of gh1-positive signals between the two groups (Fig. 3c; Student’s t test, P > 0.05). By contrast, only weak rag1-positive signals were detected in the bilateral thymic anlage of il7r−/− larvae (Fig. 3b, arrows), although the cellular localisation of rag1-positive signals was similar between WT and il7r−/− larvae. The area of rag1-positive signals in il7r−/− larvae was dramatically lower than that in WT larvae (Fig. 3d; Student’s t test, ***P < 0.001), indicating that thymopoiesis was severely impaired after il7r knockout. Taken together, these results suggested that an il7r−/− mutant line was successfully generated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Fig. 3. The validation of the il7r−/− mutant by western blotting and whole-mount in situ hybridisation.

Fig. 3

a The expression of IL7R protein in WT and il7r−/− larvae at 4 dpf. Note that no IL7R protein is detected in il7r−/− larvae. b The images of whole-mount in situ hybridisation with gh1 (arrowheads) and rag1 (arrows) mRNA probes in WT and il7r−/− larvae at 4 dpf. c-d The statistical analysis of gh1-positive area (c) or rag1-positive area (d) between WT and il7r−/− larvae. Note that rag1 expression is significantly decreased in il7r−/− larvae. Results are represented as means ± SEM, ***P < 0.001. The upper four panels in b: dorsal view. The lower two panels in b: dorsal is up, and rostral is left. Scale bar in b: 100 μm

Retinal development is delayed following il7r knockout

The phenotypes of WT and il7r−/− larvae were assessed at 12 h post fertilisation (hpf), 24 hpf, 48 hpf and 72 hpf. Compared with WT embryos (Fig. 4a–c), il7r−/− embryos showed no apparent malformation (Fig. 4f–h) before 48 hpf. However, compared with WT embryos (Fig. 4d, e), il7r−/− embryos exhibited shorter body length and smaller eyes at 72 hpf (Fig. 4i, j). We then quantified these findings in embryos from the WT and il7r−/− groups at 72 hpf (n = 30 in each group). Il7r−/− larvae showed remarkable reductions in body length and eye size (Fig. 4k, l; Student’s t test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

Fig. 4. The phenotypes of the il7r−/− mutant.

Fig. 4

a-j Phenotypes of WT and il7r−/− embryos at 12 hpf (a and f), 24 hpf (b and g), 48 hpf (c and h) and 72 hpf (d and i). e and j are the magnified images of the heads from d and i, respectively. k Statistical analysis of body length in WT and il7r−/− embryos at 72 hpf. Note that the body length of embryos in the il7r−/− group is shorter than that embryos in the WT group, results are represented as means ± SEM (n = 30), ***P < 0.001. l Statistical analysis of eye size between the two groups. Note that the il7r−/− mutants have smaller eyes, results are represented as means ± SEM (n = 30), **P < 0.01. Dorsal is up, and rostral is left in c, d, e, h, i and j. Scale bar: a-d and f-i, 200 μm; e and j, 100 μm

To investigate whether smaller eyes were associated with abnormal retinal development, we performed haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining on cross sections through the optic nerve of the retina. At 60 hpf, retinal cells began to laminate in both WT and il7r−/− groups (Supplementary Figure 2a–d). At 72 hpf, cells in the retina from the WT group were well laminated, and the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) were distinct (Fig. 5a, b). However, cells in the retina from the il7r−/− group were smaller than those in the retina from the WT group (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, the GCL, INL and ONL from the il7r−/− group were thinner than those from the WT group. Compared with nuclei in the WT group, nuclei in the il7r−/− group were dense and darkly stained, with an increased nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio (Fig. 5d). We then performed immunohistochemistry to explore neuronal differentiation in the retina at 60 hpf and 72 hpf, respectively. Zpr1 antibody can combine with protein encoded by arrestin3a (arr3a), which is specifically expressed in green and red double cones, while Zpr3 antibody binds to protein encoded by rhodopsin (rho) in rods. At 60 hpf, Zpr1-positive and Zpr3-positive signals distributed segmentally along the ONL of retina in WT group (Supplementary Figure 2e and f). However, Zpr1-positive and Zpr3-positive signals were weak and sporadic in il7r−/− group (Supplementary Figure 2g and h). Statistical analysis showed that the area of Zpr1-positive or Zpr3-positive signals were fewer in the il7r−/− group than those in the WT group (Supplementary Figure 2i and j; Student’s t test, ***P < 0.001). At 72 hpf, images from the WT group showed strong Zpr1-positive and Zpr3-positive signals distributed along the ONL, which indicated that cones and rods were well differentiated (Fig. 5e, f). The Zpr1-positive and Zpr3-positive signals in il7r−/− embryos were also located in the ONL; however, the signals were sporadic (Fig. 5g, h), indicating that the retina was immature. To quantify this finding, we performed statistical analysis on the area of Zpr1-positive and Zpr3-positive signals between the WT and il7r−/− groups. There was a significant decrease in these signals in the il7r−/− group (Fig. 5i, j; Student’s t test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). The results from HE staining and immunohistochemistry showed that il7r knockout did not alter the location of retinal neurons but delayed eye development and neuronal differentiation of the retina.

Fig. 5. Retinal development following il7r knockout.

Fig. 5

a-d HE staining and magnified images of retinas from wild-type (WT, a and b) and il7r−/− (c and d) embryos at 72 hpf. eh Images of Zpr1 or Zpr3 immunofluorescence staining of retinas in WT (e and f) and il7r−/− (g and h) embryos at 72 hpf. i-j Statistical analysis of Zpr1-positive signals (i) and Zpr3-positive signals (j) between WT and il7r−/− retinas. Note that the Zpr1-positive area (i) and Zpr3-positive area (j) are significantly decreased in il7r−/− retinas. Results are represented as means ± SEM (n = 10), **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bar: a and c, 40 μm; b and d, 10 μm; eh, 50 μm. GCL ganglion cell layer, INL inner nuclear layer, ONL outer nuclear layer, ON optic nerve

Genes related to phototransduction are down-regulated following il7r knockout

To explore the possible mechanisms of delayed neurodifferentiation following il7r knockout, we performed microarray analysis using RNA isolated from WT and il7r/− homozygotes at 4 dpf. A total of 1621 genes showed significant changes in gene expression profiles; 689 genes were up-regulated, and 932 genes were down-regulated (Fig. 6a). There were 64 down-regulated GO clusters, and the top ten GO clusters are listed in Fig. 6b. Visual perception and phototransduction were the first and second significantly decreased GO clusters following il7r knockout. We also performed signalling pathway analysis and detected ten relative down-regulated pathways (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, the phototransduction pathway also showed decreased expression. Based on GO and signalling pathway analyses, ten phototransduction-related genes were selected as follows: arr3a, opn1sw1, opn1sw2, opn1mw1, opn1lw2, opn3, pde6h, rgra, rho and rpe65a. We verified their expression by qRT-PCR. The expression of all 10 genes in the il7r−/− group was significantly lower than that in the WT group (Fig. 6d; Student’s t test, ***P < 0.001). The above results illustrated that il7r knockout leads to inhibition of genes related to phototransduction.

Fig. 6. Differential gene expression profile, gene ontology (GO) and signalling pathway analysis following il7r knockout.

Fig. 6

a The heat map of the differential gene expression profile following il7r knockout assessed by cDNA microarray. b and c The analysis of the top ten down-regulated GO (b) and signalling pathways (c). d Ten genes related to visual perception and phototransduction were selected to validate the microarray results. Results are represented as means ± SEM, ***P < 0.001. -Lg P: negative logarithm value of P values from differential gene expression by microarray

Il7r−/− larvae exhibit weak responses to light stimulus

To investigate the functional changes following delayed retinal development, we collected larvae from the WT and il7r−/− groups and performed behavioural testing at 6 dpf. The conditions included 2 min of darkness followed by 2 min of light. Digital tracks and heat maps were shown in Fig. 7a, b. When larvae were immediately exposed to light, WT larvae exhibited a sharp and upward peak in the first 10 s of 2 min of light (Fig. 7c, arrow in dotted frame). Compared with WT larvae, il7r−/− larvae swam faster in the dark, and no sharp peak was observed in the first 10 s of the 2-min light period (Fig. 7c). We then analysed the velocities during 2 min of darkness and the first 10 s of light. The average speed was significantly increased after exposure to the light stimulus in WT larvae (Fig. 7d; Student’s t test, *P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between 2 min of darkness and 10 s of light in il7r−/− larvae (Fig. 7d). These data indicated that il7r−/− larvae had a weak response to light.

Fig. 7. The swimming pattern and light response of il7r−/− larvae.

Fig. 7

a and b The digital tracks (a) and corresponding heat maps (b) of larvae from the WT and il7r−/− groups at 6 dpf. c The swimming speed in larvae from WT and il7r−/− during the 2-min dark and 2-min light periods. Note that WT larvae exhibit a sharp increase in swimming speed in the first 10 s of the 2-min light period (arrow in dotted frame). d The statistical analysis of swimming speed during the 2-min dark period and the first 10 s of the 2-min light period in WT and il7r−/− larvae. Note the increase in larvae from the WT group during the first 10 s of the 2-min light period. Results are represented as means ± SEM (n = 12), *P < 0.05

Discussion

The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) an il7r−/− mutant line was successfully generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and provides a model to investigate the novel function of the il7r gene; (2) il7r plays a regulatory role in neurogenesis, and its deficiency retards neuronal differentiation in zebrafish retina; and (3) il7r knockout down-regulates genes in the phototransduction pathway and further impairs visual function.

In this study, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to knockout the il7r gene in a zebrafish model. The activity of different sgRNAs varies based on different target genes; the general rate is in the range of 20–60%18. We designed a sgRNA targeting exon 5 and determined that the activity in our system was approximately 20%. We performed genotyping in F1 and found that the mutation was a 4-bp deletion. The ratio of F2 offspring was roughly consistent with Mendelian genetics. The off-target effect of CRISPR/Cas9 technology is a major concern due to mismatch recognition between sgRNA and the target sequence20. Several methods, including the Surveyor assay, T7E1 assay and Sanger sequencing were used to analyse the off-target effect23. We chose Sanger sequencing because of its efficiency and accuracy21. We confirmed that there was no off-target effect in the il7r−/− mutant line. The 4-bp deletion in exon 5 led to a frameshift mutation in il7r, resulting in truncated IL7R protein, which caused the loss of the conservative function domain (transmembrane helix). Hence, we used an anti-IL7R antibody raised against a peptide at the C-terminus to verify reliability. The expression of IL7R was undetectable in the il7r−/− mutant line. For further validation, we examined the development of the hypophysis and thymus by whole-mount in situ hybridisation. In il7r−/− mutants, the thymus was severely underdeveloped, whereas the hypothesis was normal, which phenocopied the il7r morpholino-based knockdown that we previously reported11. Therefore, we successfully established an il7r−/− mutant line. To our knowledge, this study is the first report of an il7r knockout zebrafish model. This mutant line generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 technique was stable and heritable. Furthermore, because the il7r gene is conserved between zebrafish and mammals, this knockout model is a powerful tool for in-depth investigation of the functions of the il7r gene as well as the mechanisms of il7r-related diseases.

The retina is considered an extension of the central nervous system in both anatomy and development24. The structure of the retina is highly conserved among vertebrates and consists of three distinct nuclear layers, the GCL, INL and ONL, separated by two plexiform layers25. The zebrafish retina is an excellent animal model to investigate neurogenesis and mechanisms of retinal diseases due to the retina’s spatial-temporal pattern of development. Photoreceptors, including cones and rods, play a vital role in phototransduction within the visual system26. Under physiological conditions, photoreceptors, including rods and cones, differentiate from 50 hpf. The first photoreceptors possess outer segments at 60 hpf within the ventral patch27,28. Photoreceptors are fully differentiated by 72 hpf29. Therefore, we chose 60 hpf and 72 hpf as time points to evaluate the retinal neurogenesis in the present study. The il7r−/− mutant showed microphthalmia in gross development. By HE staining, we found thinning of the GCL, INL and ONL at 72 hpf. Furthermore, cells in the ONL were smaller and irregularly shaped with darkly stained nuclei. Immunohistochemistry results indicated that the number of both cones and rods was lower in il7r−/− mutants either at 60 hpf or 72 hpf. Following il7r knockout, neurogenesis in the zebrafish retina was delayed. Our findings regarding the correlation between the il7r gene and retinal neurogenesis provide new insights into the neurogenic role of il7r.

We performed microarray analysis to reveal the possible mechanisms of delayed retinal development. Following il7r knockout, photoreceptor-specific genes were significantly down-regulated, and the phototransduction pathway was inhibited. Ten verified genes were classified into the following categories: (1) genes related to visual perception, such as arr3a, rpe65a and pde6h; (2) genes related to phototransduction, such as rgra, opn1mw1 and opn1sw1; and (3) genes related to both visual perception and phototransduction, such as rho, opn3, opn1lw2 and opn1sw2. The gene regulatory networks controlling photoreceptor specification include the following steps: retinal progenitors transforming into photoreceptors, rod versus cone fate, cone subtype, and opsin subtype30. In the first step, retinal homeobox gene 1 (rx1), which belongs to the retinal homeobox family, contributes to photoreceptor fate31. Rho, a transmembrane protein located in rod cells, can initiate the visual transduction cascade when photo excited. Rho is closely associated with G-protein coupled receptor activity and photoreceptor activity. Furthermore, rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors can be phosphorylated and dephosphorylated to exert its function when exposed to photons32. Arr3a, a specific protein expressed in green and red cone photoreceptors, functions in phosphoprotein binding and opsin binding. In our microarray analysis, we found that the expression of rx1, rho and arr3a significantly decreased (Supplementary Figure 3a–c; ANOVA, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). We speculated that the possible mechanism underlying retinal development regulation by il7r was via the jak1, jak3 or stat5 pathway, which caused a decrease in the expression of rx1 and its downstream genes rho and arr3a (Supplementary Figure 3d).

The following question emerged from the above findings: what are the functional changes following il7r knockout? The behavioural analysis of zebrafish larvae is a very intuitive and quick approach33,34. Zebrafish vision begins to function at 4 dpf35, and zebrafish larvae have the ability to swim at 5 dpf36. Therefore, we chose 6 dpf as the time point to test visual activity via monitoring swimming. Visual function was evaluated by a direct and non-invasive approach, which determined during movement 2-min dark and 2-min light periods37. Surprisingly, there was a big difference between il7r−/− and WT larvae. In the dark, il7r−/− mutants swam faster than WT larvae. We presumed that il7r−/− caused anxiety. When larvae were suddenly stimulated with light, WT larvae had a robust reaction in the first 10 s. The average swimming speed increased by approximately 30%. However, il7r−/− mutants hardly responded to light and showed a gradual decrease in swimming speed in the first 10 s. The swimming speed of WT and il7r−/− mutants was similar in the light environment. Physiologically, when there is a light stimulus, zebrafish prefer to swim from the dark to the light; this phenomenon is called phototaxis34. We concluded that the weak response to the light stimulus indicated that the vision of il7r−/− mutants was impaired. Moreover, the behavioural changes in il7r−/− mutants were consistent with the morphological changes, including thinner layers of neurons, darkly stained nuclei, and fewer cones and rods.

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), the most common inherited and degenerative retinal disease, causes severe vision impairment38,39. Usually, rods first undergo progressive degeneration, followed by deterioration of cones and retinal pigment epithelium40. There is no treatment or cure for RP. Rho and arr3a are involved in the pathogenesis of RP38,41. Our il7r−/− model exhibited down-regulation of rho and arr3a with impaired visual function. Our findings indicate that this model may have applications for an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms and even the development of potential therapeutic approaches for RP.

Overall, the il7r−/− knockout fish generated in this study is a powerful tool to investigate the roles of the il7r gene in vivo. Our study provides a new insight into the role of il7r in neurogenesis. This study will not only contribute to an understanding of the comprehensive functions of il7r but will also help elucidate the possible mechanisms in degenerative retinal diseases.

Materials and methods

Experimental animals

WT adult fish (Tübingen strain, TU) were raised at 28.5 °C under a 10/14-h dark/light cycle42. Embryos were collected after natural spawning and rinsed with system water to remove contaminants. Embryos were reared in E3 medium (5 mmol/L NaCl, 0.17 mmol/L KCl, 0.33 mmol/L CaCl2, and 0.33 mmol/L MgSO4, pH 7.2) in Petri dishes. Embryos/larvae were developmentally staged by hpf or dpf. All the animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of Nankai University and conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines.

CRISPR design, synthesis and microinjection

According to the principle of CRISPR/Cas9, sgRNAs against the il7r gene (ENSDARG00000078970) were designed using a CRISPR design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/)43. The sgRNA target sequences for il7r were as follows: ACTCCACTCACTCCAGTCACCGG. sgRNA was generated with a pX330 vector template (BioVector NTCC Inc. Beijing, China) and transcribed using a MAXIscript T7 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The pGH-T7-zCas9 plasmid was linearised by XbaI and then transcribed in vitro to generate Cas9 mRNA using a mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Zebrafish embryos were injected with 1 nL mixed solution containing 50 ng/mL sgRNA and 250 ng/mL Cas9 mRNA44. Embryos were then incubated with sterile E3 medium and raised at 28.5 °C.

Analysis of CRISPR-targeted mutation of il7r

At 7 hpf, 5 injected embryos were collected, and genomic DNA was extracted. A PCR assay was conducted to identify CRISPR-induced mutations. The screening primers were designed around the il7r sgRNA target site and amplified a 464-bp region in exon 5. The primer sequences were listed as follows: forward: il7r-exon5F: 5′-GGTTTGAACACCGTCATGATT-3′; reverse: il7r-exon5R: 5′-AAGTGGGATTTGAAACAACGA-3′. PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). DNA isolated from a single colony was sequenced by il7r-exon 5 to verify the efficiency of the target site (the numbers of colonies with mutations/the total number of colonies sequenced).

Generation of the il7r−/− mutant line

At 1 month post fertilisation, the tail fins of the injected fish were cut and sequenced using an il7r-exon 5F primer to identify the F0 founder. F0 adults were self-crossed to generate F1 progeny. F1 embryos were raised normally until 60 dpf, and DNA of the caudal fin was extracted, PCR amplified and sequenced to identify heterozygous F1. F1 il7r+/− heterozygotes were self-crossed to generate F2. F2 generation embryos were randomly selected, and genotype identification was performed at 4 dpf. Two forward primers, il7r-4 bp wt (sequence: 5′-AACTATTTTGCCGGTGAC-3′) and il7r-4 bp mut (sequence: 5′-AACTATTTTGCCGGTGGA-3′), and one common reverse primer, il7r-exon 5 R, were used to screen il7r−/− homozygotes. To determine the off-target effects of the sgRNA:Cas 9 system, 50 potential sites were predicted among which 15 were identified in genes. The top ten sites were selected for further analysis by a PCR assay and sequencing21. The predicted sites and primers are listed in Table S1 and S2, respectively. A mutant line, il7r −/−, was characterised and used for all data presented herein.

Western blot analysis

At 4 dpf, 30 larvae from the WT or il7r−/− groups were harvested and lysed with lysis buffer containing RIPA (CWBiotech, Beijing, China), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (PI, Promega), Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail 2 (PPI2, Sigma) and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail 3 (PPI3, Sigma) at a ratio of 100:1:1:1:1. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described11. Anti-IL7R polyclonal antibody (1:400; Santa Cruz, sc-662, Dallas, TX, USA) was used as the primary antibody. Anti-actin monoclonal antibody (1:3000; Santa Cruz, sc-58679) was used as a loading control.

Whole-mount in situ hybridisation

Embryos or larvae were treated with 0.003% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU, Sigma) to block pigmentation until 4 dpf. A standard protocol was used to perform whole-mount in situ hybridisation45. A rag1 (GenBank NM_131389) mRNA probe was used as a marker to explore the development of the thymus. A gh1 (GenBank NM_001020492) probe was used to label hormone-producing cells in the hypophysis. Probes were added to RNase free tubes at a concentration of 2 ng/μL and hybridised overnight at 55 °C. Larvae were washed and incubated with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) at a dilution of 1:1500 on the second day. The colour reaction was mediated by nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (NBT/BCIP, Roche) on the third day. The above experiment was repeated three times.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

At 60 and 72 hpf, embryos were anaesthetised with 0.1% ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt (MS-222; Sigma), euthanized and immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. For histological analyses, larvae were embedded in paraffin, and serial transverse sections (5 µm) were obtained. HE staining was performed using a standard protocol. For immunohistochemistry, serial transverse cryosectioning (8 µm) was performed. The following primary antibodies were used in this study: mouse monoclonal antibodies Zpr1 (diluted at1:200, Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC), Eugene, OR, USA) and Zpr3 (diluted at1:200, ZIRC) to label cone and rod cells, respectively. Ten embryos were processed in each group.

Microarray analysis

At 4 dpf, 20 larvae from the WT and il7r−/− groups were collected, anaesthetised and immediately euthanized. Total RNA was extracted, linearly amplified, labelled with a GeneChip® WT Terminal Labelling and Controls Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and quantified. The above experiment was repeated in three batches of larvae to generate biological replicates of WT and il7r−/− samples. mRNA expression profiling was measured using a Zebrafish Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which contains 59302 gene-level probe sets. GeneChip2 Scanner 30007 G (Affymetrix) was used to scan the hybridized arrays. Microarray analysis was performed by Expression Console Software (version 1.2.1; Affymetrix). The microarray data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The GEO series accession number is GSE101138 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE101138).

Bioinformatics analysis

For microarray data analysis, differentially expressed genes were recognised based on one-way ANOVA. The criteria set for significantly different expression were identified as up-regulated or down-regulated according to the following standard: ANOVA P-value <0.05, |Fold change| >1.5. The false discovery rate was calculated to correct the P-value. GO analysis was performed to evaluate the affected biological processes and molecular functions. Two-sided Fisher’s exact test and multiple comparisons were used to classify the GO category, and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Pathway analysis was applied to determine the significant pathways of the differentially expressed genes according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. The significant pathway was selected by Fisher’s exact test. The threshold for KEGG significance was P < 0.05.

Quantitative RT-PCR

At 4 dpf, 15 larvae were collected from the WT and il7r−/− groups, and total RNA was isolated by using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the TransStart® Top Green qPCR Supermix (TransGen, Beijing, China). The procedures were as follows: 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The sequences of the primers are listed in Table 1. The relative expression of mRNA was calculated by the 2−△△Ct method46. For each gene, the above experiment was performed on three independent duplicates.

Table 1.

Primer sequences of genes related to visual perception and phototransduction for qRT-PCR

Gene GeneBank Sequence (5′ to 3′)
arr3a NM_001002405 Forward: AAGACCTGGACGTGATTG
Reverse: TTGAAAGTGAAGGGATGG
opn1lw2 NM_001002443 Forward: CAGCACAATCAGCGTCAT
Reverse: TGCCCATTTACCATCAAA
opn1mw1 NM_131253 Forward: AGCCCAGCACAAGAAACT
Reverse: AGCAACCTGACCTCCAAG
opn1sw1 NM_131319 Forward: GGCTTTGTATTTATCGTGG
Reverse: CCTGCTAGGGAGATGTTTA
opn1sw2 NM_131192 Forward: GGACTCCCTCCACTCTTA
Reverse: GAATACAATGGTGCTGAAA
opn3 NM_001111164 Forward: GAGAAGAAAGTGGCGGTGAT
Reverse: ATAATGGCGACGGTAGGG
pde6h NM_001305554 Forward: GACCACTCGCACCTTCAA
Reverse: ATGTCTCCAAACGCTTCC
rgra NM_001017877 Forward: GAGAAGAAAGTGGCGGTGAT
Reverse: ATAATGGCGACGGTAGGG
rho NM_131084 Forward: TCATCTGCTGGTTGCCCTA
Reverse: CAGTGACGGAACTGCTTGTT
rpe65a NM_200751 Forward: ACTCAACCATTTCGTCCCT
Reverse: TACCGTCGTCCTCATCCA

Behavioural test

The behavioural test was performed at 6 dpf and recorded with a DanioVision system (Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, the Netherlands). Larvae were divided into the WT and il7r−/− groups. Twelve larvae from each group were collected and placed in a 24-well plate. Each well contained one larva with 2 mL E3 medium. After a 30-min dark adaption in the chamber, the movement of larvae was recorded for 4 min, including a 2-min dark period followed by a 2-min light stimulus. Ethovision® XT 11.5 software was used to analyse digital tracks and generate heat maps. The average velocities in the dark and in the first 10 s of light were set as the parameters to evaluate visual function. The behavioural test described above was repeated three times.

Photography and image analysis

Images of the phenotypes of embryos or larvae and images of whole-mount in situ hybridisation were captured with a DP72 digital camera mounted on an SZX16 dissecting microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). DP2-BSW software (Olympus) was used to calculate the body lengths, eye sizes and areas of gh1/rag1-positive signals. Images of HE staining were photographed with a DP71 digital camera mounted on a BX51 fluorescence microscope (Olympus). Images of immunofluorescence were captured with an FV 1000 confocal microscope (Olympus). ImageJ software (1.49×; NIH, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) was used to convert the fluorescence images of Zpr1 or Zpr3 immunostaining to 8-bit greyscale prior to thresholding and calculate the area of positive areas in each image. All images were compiled in Adobe Photoshop CS6 Portable (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA) and resized. All images involved in the experiment were similarly manipulated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad software (version 5.01, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). All values are presented as the means ± SEM. Student’s t test was performed to evaluate statistical significance between two independent groups. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental data (18.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Figure 1 (19.8MB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 3 (15.4MB, tif)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0103201), the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (81671179 and 81600397), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (63171425), and the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (15JCYBJC24400). The authors thank Weiping Tang of Cnkingbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for bioinformatics assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Edited by A Verkhratsky

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41419-018-0337-z.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jiang Q, et al. Cell biology of IL-7, a key lymphotrophin. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:513–533. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gonzalez-Garcia S, Garcia-Peydro M, Alcain J, Toribio ML. Notch1 and IL-7 receptor signalling in early T-cell development and leukaemia. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012;360:47–73. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iwanami N, et al. Genetic evidence for an evolutionarily conserved role of IL-7 signaling in T cell development of zebrafish. J. Immunol. 2011;186:7060–7066. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Corfe SA, Paige CJ. The many roles of IL-7 in B cell development; mediator of survival, proliferation and differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 2012;24:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ribeiro D, Melao A, Barata JT. IL-7R-mediated signaling in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2013;53:211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zago CA, et al. Autoimmune manifestations in SCID due to IL7R mutations: Omenn syndrome and cytopenias. Hum. Immunol. 2014;75:662–666. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rane L, et al. Alternative splicing of interleukin-7 (IL-7) and interleukin-7 receptor alpha (IL-7Ralpha) in peripheral blood from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) J. Neuroimmunol. 2010;222:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arbelaez CA, et al. IL-7/IL-7 receptor signaling differentially affects effector CD4+T cell subsets involved in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2015;195:1974–1983. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haas J, Korporal M, Schwarz A, Balint B, Wildemann B. The interleukin-7 receptor alpha chain contributes to altered homeostasis of regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011;41:845–853. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gregory SG, et al. Interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) shows allelic and functional association with multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:1083–1091. doi: 10.1038/ng2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lei X, et al. Down-regulation of interleukin 7 receptor (IL-7R) contributes to central nervous system demyelination. Oncotarget. 2017;8:28395–28407. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bibikova M, Golic M, Golic KG, Carroll D. Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. 2002;161:1169–1175. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Christian M, et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. 2010;186:757–761. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.120717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jinek M, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. 2010;327:167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2012;482:331–338. doi: 10.1038/nature10886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Makarova KS, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:467–477. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hwang WY, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:227–229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ran FA, et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013;154:1380–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu X, Kriz AJ, Sharp PA. Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Quant. Biol. 2014;2:59–70. doi: 10.1007/s40484-014-0030-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang N, et al. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res. 2013;23:465–472. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Willett CE, Zapata AG, Hopkins N, Steiner LA. Expression of zebrafish rag genes during early development identifies the thymus. Dev. Biol. 1997;182:331–341. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huang MC, Cheong WC, Lim LS, Li MH. A simple, high sensitivity mutation screening using Ampligase mediated T7 endonuclease I and Surveyor nuclease with microfluidic capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:788–796. doi: 10.1002/elps.201100460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.London A, Benhar I, Schwartz M. The retina as a window to the brain-from eye research to CNS disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013;9:44–53. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malicki J, Pooranachandran N, Nikolaev A, Fang X, Avanesov A. Analysis of the retina in the zebrafish model. Methods Cell Biol. 2016;134:257–334. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nakao T, Tsujikawa M, Notomi S, Ikeda Y, Nishida K. The role of mislocalized phototransduction in photoreceptor cell death of retinitis pigmentosa. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schmitt EA, Dowling JE. Early retinal development in the zebrafish, Danio rerio: light and electron microscopic analyses. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999;404:515–536. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990222)404:4&#x0003c;515::AID-CNE8&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kljavin IJ. Early development of photoreceptors in the ventral retina of the zebrafish embryo. J. Comp. Neurol. 1987;260:461–471. doi: 10.1002/cne.902600311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ghiasvand NM, et al. Deletion of a remote enhancer near ATOH7 disrupts retinal neurogenesis, causing NCRNA disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2011;14:578–586. doi: 10.1038/nn.2798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Viets K, Eldred KC, Johnston RJ., Jr. Mechanisms of photoreceptor patterning in vertebrates and invertebrates. Trends Genet. 2016;32:638–659. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nelson SM, Park L, Stenkamp DL. Retinal homeobox 1 is required for retinal neurogenesis and photoreceptor differentiation in embryonic zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 2009;328:24–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kennedy MJ, et al. Multiple phosphorylation of rhodopsin and the in vivo chemistry underlying rod photoreceptor dark adaptation. Neuron. 2001;31:87–101. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00340-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Riehl R, et al. Behavioral and physiological effects of acute ketamine exposure in adult zebrafish. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2011;33:658–667. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li L. Zebrafish mutants: behavioral genetic studies of visual system defects. Dev. Dyn. 2001;221:365–372. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brockerhoff SE. Measuring the optokinetic response of zebrafish larvae. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2448–2451. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li Q, et al. Differential behavioral responses of zebrafish larvae to yohimbine treatment. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.). 2015;232:197–208. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3656-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Houbrechts AM, et al. Deiodinase knockdown affects zebrafish eye development at the level of gene expression, morphology and function. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2016;424:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Daiger SP, Sullivan LS, Bowne SJ. Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa. Clin. Genet. 2013;84:132–141. doi: 10.1111/cge.12203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ferrari S, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa: genes and disease mechanisms. Curr. Genom. 2011;12:238–249. doi: 10.2174/138920211795860107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Camacho ET, Punzo C, Wirkus SA. Quantifying the metabolic contribution to photoreceptor death in retinitis pigmentosa via a mathematical model. J. Theor. Biol. 2016;408:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rosenfeld PJ, et al. A null mutation in the rhodopsin gene causes rod photoreceptor dysfunction and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Genet. 1992;1:209–213. doi: 10.1038/ng0692-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) (University of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR, 1993).
  • 43.Hwang WY, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:227–229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xiao A, Zhang B. Generation of targeted genomic deletions through CRISPR/Cas system in zebrafish. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1451:65–79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3771-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chitramuthu BP, Bennett HP. High resolution whole mount in situ hybridization within zebrafish embryos to study gene expression and function. J. Vis. Exp. 2013;80:e50644. doi: 10.3791/50644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data (18.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Figure 1 (19.8MB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 3 (15.4MB, tif)

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES