Correction to: Achilles tenodesis for calcaneal insufficiency avulsion fractures associated with diabetes mellitus

Correction

The original publication of this article [1] contained the wrong versions of Tables 1, 2 and 3. In this correction the updated tables are published. The original publication has been updated.

Table 1.

Demographic Data of Patients

	No	Sex	Age	Period of follow-up (months)	PMHx	Duration of DM (years)	HgbA1c	Injury Mechanism	Pre-operative VAS
CIA fracture	1	F	63	14	DM	20	7.6	Ankle sprain	2
	2	M	55	15	DM ESRD	10	8.5	Walking	3
	3	F	48	20	DM	6	15.1	Walking	6
	4	M	51	18	DM	16	7.4	Climbing a hill	4
	5	F	48	18	DM ESRD	25	8.9	Climbing a hill	5
	6	M	43	16	DM	15	8.1	Walking	3
	7	M	79	20	DM ESRD	25	9.1	Walking	3

Table 2.

The treatment process of Patients

	No	1st operation	2nd operation	3rd operation
CIA fracture	1	ORIFa with screw (pulled out)	ORIF with TBWb (pulled out)	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection
	2	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection	Suture anchor removal because of pulled out failure
	3	ORIF with screw (pulled out)	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection
	4	ORIF with screw (pulled out)	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection
	5	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection
	6	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection
	7	Achilles tenodesis and bone fragment resection

^aOpen reduction and internal fixation

^bTension band wiring

Table 3.

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and single-heel rise test of Patients at final follow up

		FAOS
Group	No	PAIN	SYMPTOMS	ADLa	SPORT&RECb	QOLc	VAS	Single-heel rise test
CIA fractures	1	77.8	82.1	85.3	75	81.3	3	+
	2	72.2	75.0	63.2	45	68.8	4	-
	3	88.9	89.3	85.3	75	87.5	3	+
	4	72.2	82.1	80.9	85	75	2	+
	5	77.8	82.1	77.9	80	81.3	3	+
	6	85.6	89.4	86.9	85	75	2	+
	7	89.5	86.9	83.8	85	76.4	1	+
	Mean	80.6	83.8	80.5	75.6	77.9	2.6

^aActivities of daily living

^bSport and recreation function

^cFoot and ankle-related quality of life