Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2017 Aug 15;19(17):4460–4463. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01994

Rh-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition of Aryl and Alkenyl Boronic Acids to α-Methylene-β-lactones: Stereoselective Synthesis of trans-3,4-Disubstituted β-Lactones

Christian A Malapit 1,, Irungu K Luvaga 1, Donald R Caldwell 1, Nicholas K Schipper 1, Amy R Howell 1,*
PMCID: PMC5834916  NIHMSID: NIHMS944745  PMID: 28809569

Abstract

A one-step preparation of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones through Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition of aryl or alkenyl boronic acids to α-methylene-β-lactones is described. The operationally simple, stereoselective transformation provides a broad range of β-lactones from individual α-methylene-β-lactone templates. This methodology allowed for a direct, final-step C-3 diversification of nocardiolactone, an antimicrobial natural product.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms944745u1.jpg


β-Lactones are an important class of heterocycles found in many synthetic and natural products of biological interest.1 They have been explored for anti-obesity,2 anticancer,3 and antibacterial4 applications and have been utilized as probes in activity-based protein profiling (ABPP).1b,5,6 β-Lactones are also versatile intermediates in organic synthesis with a broad range of reactivities.7 We recently showed that α-methylene-β-lactones 1 could be used for the synthesis of structurally diverse 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones 2 via cross-metathesis (CM)8 to 3 and subsequent reduction (Figure 1a).6 While this methodology is attractive for assembling focused libraries of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones, there are limitations. First, the CM reaction typically requires high catalyst loading (5–10 mol %). Secondly, the 1,4-reduction to access the generally more biologically active trans β-lactones suffers from modest diasteroselectivities and yields. We hypothesized that β-lactones 2 could be directly accessed from 1 via conjugate addition, in particular, with organoboron reagents under Rh catalysis (Figure 1b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Syntheses of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones 2 from α-methylene-β-lactones 1.

(a) Two-step synthesis of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones from 1 (previous work):

(b) Proposed one-step synthesis of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones from 1 (this work):

Rh catalyzed conjugate additions of organoboron reagents to a wide range of activated alkenes have emerged as one of the most powerful approaches to this type of reaction.9 There are significant advantages in comparison to other traditional methods, such as organocuprate chemistry. Only catalytic amounts of the metal are used; indeed, catalytic loadings as low as 0.5 mol % have been reported. The reactions can be carried out in water or water/organic solvent mixtures. In addition, more and more aryl and alkenyl boronic acids and esters are commercially available, or they can be readily synthesized. Significantly for us, substrates containing γ- and δ-lactones and –lactams have been utilized and tolerated.10 We recognized, however, two critical challenges. First, β-lactones may not be compatible with the most commonly reported basic/aqueous conditions due to facile ring-opening of the starting material or products.7 Secondly, the propensity towards β-hydride elimination11 of the anticipated intermediate A, giving Heck-type product 3 (Figure 1b) could result. Here, we report an efficient, stereoselective, one-step synthesis of 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones via Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition of organoboron reagents to α-methylene-β-lactones.

Initial studies examined the reaction of α-methylene-β-lactone 1a with phenylboronic acid in 3:1 toluene/H2O at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 1) using Wilkinson's catalyst and K2CO3 as base. Although complete conversion was observed after 24 h, a 1:1 mixture of conjugate addition 4 and Heck-type product 5 resulted. In addition, there was extensive material decomposition. Lowering the temperature to 60 °C resulted in a very low conversion (entry 2). However, switching the catalyst to [Rh(cod)Cl]2 afforded a 100% conversion at the lower temperature, although still providing a mixture of Heck and conjugate addition products (2:1 ratio of 4/5) (entry 3). The competition between Heck-type reaction and conjugate addition has been previously observed and mechanistically rationalized.11 In some previous studies it has been demonstrated that conjugate addition or Heck-type reaction can be selectively achieved by tuning the catalyst, solvent, reactant ratios, and/or additives. For our system, using a strong base, such as KOH, enhanced conjugate addition relative to Heck reaction (entries 4–6). The ratio of 4/5 and the reaction rate were dependent on the amount of KOH (entries 5–8) with 1 equiv providing optimum conversion to 4 (entry 5). The use of 2 equiv KOH (entry 4) gave good selectivity but diminished isolated yield, possibly due to decomposition12 of the starting material or products. With no base, the reaction essentially did not proceed at 60 °C (entry 8). While screening other catalysts with the optimized base, temperature and solvent (entries 9,10), [Rh(nbd)Cl]2 proved equally efficient to [Rh(cod)Cl]2. Subsequent studies on the scope of the reaction employed [Rh(cod)Cl]2 as the catalyst and KOH (1 equiv) as the base.

Table 1. Optimization of Rh-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition (CA) of Phenylboronic Acid to 1aa.

graphic file with name nihms944745u2.jpg

entry Rh catalyst base (equiv) conv; atime c4:5 (% yield 4)
1d RhCl(PPh3)3 K2CO3 (2) 100%, 24 h 1:1e
2 RhCl(PPh3)3 K2CO3 (2) <5%, 24 h
3 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 K2CO3 (2) 100%; 1h 2:1
4 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 KOH (2) 100%; 1h 20:1 (60)e
5 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 KOH (1) 100%; 1h 20:1 (92)e
6 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 KOH (0.5) 100%; 1h 3.5:1
7 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 KOH (0.1) 100%; 48h 2:1
8 [Rh(cod)Cl]2 none <5%; 24 h
9 RhCl(PPh3)3 KOH (1) 100%; 24h 2:1e
10 [Rh(nbd)Cl]2 KOH (1) 100%; 1h 20:1 (90)e
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), PhB(OH)2 (0.75 mmol), Rh catalyst (2 mol % “Rh”); for entries 1–3, solvent = PhCH3/H2O (3:1); for entries 4–11, solvent = dioxane/H2O (10:1). Yields in parentheses are isolated yields of 4.

b

Time required to obtain 100%consumption of 1a based on 1H NMR analysis.

c

Ratio of 4:5 based on 1H NMR of crude reaction mixture.

d

80 °C.

e

Trans:cis ratio of 4, 2:1.

With conditions optimized, the scope of the reaction with respect to the β-lactone and organoboron reagents was explored (Scheme 1). A variety of α-methylene-β-lactones reacted with phenylboronic acid to provide the corresponding 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones (4, 68) in good to excellent yields with modest to good 3,4-trans selectivity.13 In general, the lactone diastereomers were separable (see SI). Bulkier substituents at C-4 (see 6, 13, 16, 19, 22, 23) enhanced diastereoselectivity. As previously mentioned, most monocyclic β-lactone natural products and close analogs that have been explored as drugs or probes are trans diastereomers.1-6,7a,14 Nevertheless, cis-β-lactones have been shown to be as potent as their trans-isomers in some cases.15 Thus, at this stage, access to both diastereomers is advantageous from the standpoint of diversification.

Scheme 1. Scope of Rh-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition of Boronic Acids to α-Methylene-β-lactonesa.

Scheme 1

aTypical reaction conditions: α-methylene-β-lactone (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), boronic acid (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), [Rh(cod)Cl]2 (1 mol %, 0.01 equiv), KOH (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 10:1 dioxane/H2O (2.8 mL) at 60 °C for 1 h. In all cases the CA:Heck reaction selectivity is >20:1. Values in parenthesis are isolated yields of the combined isomers. Isomers were separable in most cases (see Supporting Information).

A variety of aryl boronic acids was examined next. As summarized in Scheme 1, both electron rich and electron poor aryl boronic acids reacted efficiently with α-methylene-β-lactones. More importantly, diverse functional groups were tolerated, including, aryl chlorides (13), benzyl/phenyl ethers (14–16), phenol (18), and styrene (19). Heterocyclic-containing aryl boronic acids (20, 21) also underwent conjugate addition in good yields. Moreover, alkenyl boronic acids were suitable coupling partners, providing C-3 allylated β-lactones (22, 23) in good yields. Notably, the alkene geometry of the boronic acid is preserved in the lactone product. Under similar conditions, α-methylene-γ-lactone also underwent conjugate addition to yield α-substituted γ-lactones (24, 25) in excellent yields.

Nocardiolactone (Scheme 1), a trans-3,4-disubstituted β-lactone, is a natural product isolated from pathogenic Nocardia strains and has been found to exhibit antimicrobial activities.6b,16,17 Using the developed Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition of boronic acids to a single substrate, a direct, final-stage diversification at C-3 of nocardiolactone was achieved. Nocardiolactone analogs (2628) were obtained in excellent yields.

Having achieved control of conjugate addition vs Heck reaction, future efforts will focus on control of relative and absolute stereochemistry. Catalysts, ligands and bases have all been used to influence both diastereo and enantiostereoselectivity in Rh catalyzed conjugated additions.9,10 In our studies a 2:1 trans/cis ratio of 4 was seen under all conditions explored using the catalysts noted for the reaction of 1a and phenylboronic acid (See entries 1, 4, 5, 9 and 10 in Table 1. Also, the same ratio was seen with other bases/reaction conditions not included here). We also determined that this outcome was not dependent on equilibration subsequent to product formation. A 1:1 mixture of trans/cis-4 was subjected to the optimized reaction conditions and was recovered unchanged. A broader range of Rh catalysts and associated ligands will be explored to enhance control of relative stereochemistry. The preparation of enantioenriched α-methylene-β-lactones has been previously reported, and these methods can be used to access enantioenriched 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones.18

We view α-methylene-β-lactones as masked Morita-Baylis-Hillman (MBH) adducts.8,19 Not only are these lactones readily prepared from and returned to MBH products, but α-methylene-β-lactones also undergo reactions that MBH products do not. For example, whether the allylic OH is protected or not, MBH adducts do not readily undergo CM reactions, while α-methylene-β-lactones (and -lactams) have been shown to be superior CM partners.8 Navarre et al.20 reported that, when MBH adducts were treated with aryl boronic acids under conditions similar to ours, in sharp contrast to our results, trisubstituted alkenes were obtained (see Scheme 2), an outcome that persisted with different rhodium catalysts, solvents and types of organoboron reagent. When the acetate of a MBH adduct was used, lower reactivity was observed, but the result was the same. We confirmed that, under conditions that gave conjugate addition for α-methylene-β-lactones, MBH adduct 29 reacted with phenylboronic acid to give exclusively trisubstituted (E)-alkene 30 in 90% yield (Scheme 2). Thus, while conjugate addition products from MBH adducts appear to be inaccessible under Rh catalysis, such products would result from transesterification of the β-lactone products obtained from Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition of boronic acids to α-methylene-β-lactones.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reaction of MBH Adduct 29

In summary, we describe the development of a Rh-catalyzed conjugate addition of boronic acids to α-methylene-β-lactones (and -γ-lactones) to yield a variety of 3,4-disubstituted β-(and -γ)-lactones in excellent yields with moderate to good trans selectivities. This methodology is operationally simple with 1 mol % [Rh(cod)Cl]2, a reaction time of 1 h, and temperature of 60 °C, preventing unwanted ring-opening reactions. Furthermore, the method is compatible with both aryl and alkenyl boronic acids and tolerates a wide range of functionalities, including, aryl chloride, phenol, styrene and heterocyles. Lastly, this method was utilized in a direct diversification of nocardiolactone to construct C-3 analogs. We anticipate that this approach will have broad utility for late-stage diversification of biologically relevant 3,4-disubstituted β-lactones.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grant: R01 CA193994.Boehringer Ingelheim is acknowledged for financial support (BI Fellowship for C.A.M.).

Footnotes

Supporting Information: The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Detailed experimental procedures, analytical and spectral data for all new compounds (PDF).

Notes: The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  • 1.For reviews related to biological activity of β-lactones, see: Groll M, Korotkov VS, Huber EM, de Meijere A, Ludwig A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:7810. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502931.; (b) Yang PY, Liu K, Zhang C, Chen GYJ, Shen Y, Ngai MH, Lear MJ, Yao SQ. Chem Asian J. 2011;6:2762. doi: 10.1002/asia.201100306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kluge AF, Petter RC. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;14:421. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For leading references and reviews, see: Chandra S, Jyothi M, Raghu MRP. WJPPS. 2015;4:448.; (b) Kumar P, Dubey KK. RSC Adv. 2015;5:86954. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wei K, Wang GQ, Bai X, Niu YF, Chen HP, Wen CN, Li ZH, Dong ZJ, Zui ZL, Xiong WY, Liu JK. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2015;5:129. doi: 10.1007/s13659-015-0062-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.For leading references and reviews, see: Zhu M, Harshbarger WD, Robles O, Krysiak J, Hull KG, Cho SW, Richardson RD, Yang Y, Garcia A, Spiegelman L, Ramirez B, Wilson CT, Yau JA, Moore JT, Walker CB, Sacchettini JC, Liu WR, Sieber SA, Smith JW, Romo D. Bioorg Med Chem. 2017;25:2901. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.01.020.; (b) Gill KA, Berrue F, Arens JC, Carr G, Kerr RG. J Nat Prod. 2015;78:822. doi: 10.1021/np501060k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Harvey ML, Krysiak J, Chamni S, Cho SW, Sieber SA, Romo D. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:1425. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) List A, Zeiler E, Gallastegui N, Rusch M, Hedberg C, Sieber SA, Groll M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:571. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tekkam S, Alam MA, Just MJ, Berry SM, Johnson JL, Jonnalagadda SC, Mereddy VR. Anti-cancer Agents Med Chem. 2013;13:1514. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wustrow D, Zhou HJ, Rolfe M. Annu Rep Med Chem. 2013;48:205. [Google Scholar]; (g) Richardson RD, Ma G, Oyola Y, Zancanella M, Knowles LM, Cieplak P, Romo D, Smith JW. J Med Chem. 2008;51:5285. doi: 10.1021/jm800321h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Yoshida K, Yamaguchi K, Sone T, Unno Y, Asai A, Yokosawa H, Matsuda A, Arisawa M, Shuto S. Org Lett. 2008;10:3571. doi: 10.1021/ol8013304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Kridel SJ, Axelrod F, Rozenkrantz N, Smith JW. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2070. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Knowles LM, Axelrod F, Browne CD, Smith JW. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:30540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405061200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Feling RH, Buchanan GO, Mincer TJ, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:355. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Corey EJ, Li WDZ. Chem Pharm Bull. 1999;47:1. doi: 10.1248/cpb.47.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.For leading references and reviews, see: Wu G, Zhang Z, Chen H, Lin K. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25:2345. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.04.035.; (b) Weinandy F, Lorenz-Baath K, Korotkov VS, Böttcher T, Sethi S, Chakraborty T, Sieber SA. ChemMedChem. 2014;9:710. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201300325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Compton CL, Schmitz KR, Sauer RT, Sello JK. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:2669. doi: 10.1021/cb400577b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) De Pascale G, Nazi I, Harrison PHM, Wright GD. J Antibiot. 2011;64:483. doi: 10.1038/ja.2011.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Böttcher T, Sieber SA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4600. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wells JS, Trejo WH, Principe PA, Sykes RB. J Antibiot. 1984;37:802. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.37.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Tymiak AA, Culver CA, Malley MF, Gougoutas JZ. J Org Chem. 1985;50:5491. [Google Scholar]; (h) Pu Y, Lowe C, Sailer M, Vederas JC. J Org Chem. 1994;59:3642. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For leading references and reviews, see: Davda D, Martin BR. MedChemComm. 2014;5:268. doi: 10.1039/C3MD00333G.; (b) Lajkiewicz NJ, Cognetta AB, III, Niphakis MJ, Cravatt BF, Porco JA., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:2659. doi: 10.1021/ja412431g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Böttcher T, Sieber SA. MedChemComm. 2012;3:408. [Google Scholar]; (c) Dekker FJ, Rocks O, Vartak N, Menninger S, Hedberg C, Balamurugan R, Wetzel S, Renner S, Gerauer M, Schölermann B, Rusch M, Kramer JW, Rauh D, Coates GW, Brunsveld L, Bastiaens PIH, Waldmann H. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:449. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang Z, Gu C, Colby T, Shindo T, Balamurugan R, Waldmann H, Kaiser M, van der Hoorn RA. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:557. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Kamat SS, Camara K, Parsons WH, Chen DH, Dix MM, Bird TD, Howell AR, Cravatt BF. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:164. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Camara K, Kamat SS, Lasota CC, Cravatt BF, Howell AR. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25:317. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.11.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For selected reviews, see: Nelson SG, Dura RD, Peelen TJ. Org React. 2013;82:471.; (b) Wang Y, Tennyson RL, Romo D. Heterocycles. 2004;64:605. [Google Scholar]; (c) Pommier A, Pons JM. Synthesis. 1993:441. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Raju R, Howell AR. Org Lett. 2006;8:2139. doi: 10.1021/ol060624v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liang Y, Raju R, Taylor CD, Le T, Howell AR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:1020. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.For leading references and reviews, see: Albrecht F, Sowada O, Fistikci M, Boysen MMK. Org Lett. 2014;16:5212. doi: 10.1021/ol502630w.; (b) Edwards HJ, Hargrave JD, Penrose SD, Frost CG. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:2093. doi: 10.1039/b919762c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Collier PN. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:3909. [Google Scholar]; (c) Konno T, Tanaka T, Miyabe T, Morigaki A, Ishihara T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:2106. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fagnou K, Lautens M. Chem Rev. 2003;103:169. doi: 10.1021/cr020007u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hayashi T, Yamasaki K. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2829. doi: 10.1021/cr020022z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Croix C, Prié G, Chaulet C, Viaud-Massuard MC. J Org Chem. 2015;80:3264. doi: 10.1021/jo502784h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Allen JC, Kociok-Köhn G, Frost CG. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:32. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06586f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Navarro C, Moreno A, Csákÿ AG. J Org Chem. 2009;74:466. doi: 10.1021/jo8022395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) De Risi C, Fanton G, Pollini GP, Trapella C, Valente F, Zanirato V. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2008;19:131. [Google Scholar]; (e) Shintani R, Duan WL, Hayashi T. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:5628. doi: 10.1021/ja061430d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Hargrave JD, Bish G, Frost CG. Chem Commun. 2006:4389. doi: 10.1039/b610128c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Chen G, Tokunaga N, Hayashi T. Org Lett. 2005;7:2285. doi: 10.1021/ol0507367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Shintani R, Ueyama K, Yamada I, Hayashi T. Org Lett. 2004;6:3425. doi: 10.1021/ol048421z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Zou G, Guo J, Wang Z, Huang W, Tang J. Dalton Trans. 2007:3055. doi: 10.1039/b615473e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zou G, Wang Z, Zhu J, Tang J. Chem Commun. 2003:2438. doi: 10.1039/b305771m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Based on 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
  • 13.The relative stereochemistry was deduced based on a combination of comparison of spectral data to known compounds and trends seen from previous work (ref 6b) for coupling constants and relative chemical shifts for trans/cis-isomers.
  • 14.For additional leading references for the synthesis of trans-β-lactones see: Mulzer M, Coates GW. J Org Chem. 2014;79:11851. doi: 10.1021/jo501899e.; (b) Meier P, Broghammer F, Latendorf K, Rauhut G, Peters R. Molecules. 2012;17:7121. doi: 10.3390/molecules17067121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhao C, Mitchell AT, Vallakati R, Pérez LM, Romo D. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:3084. doi: 10.1021/ja209163w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ponzano S, Bertozzi F, Mengatto L, Dionisi M, Armirotti A, Romeo E, Berteotti A, Fiorelli C, Tarozzo G, Reggiani A, Duranti A, Tarzia G, Mor M, Cavalli A, Piomelli D, Bendiera T. J Med Chem. 2013;56:6917. doi: 10.1021/jm400739u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Purohit VC, Richardson RD, Smith JW, Romo D. J Org Chem. 2006;71:4549. doi: 10.1021/jo060392d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mikami Y, Yazawa Y, Tanaka Y, Ritzau M, Grafe U. Nat Prod Lett. 1999;13:277. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.For total syntheses of nocardiolactones: Kumaraswamy G, Markondaiah B. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:5861.; Sun YP, Wu Y. Synlett. 2005:1477. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Malapit CA, Caldwell DR, Sassu N, Milbin S, Howell AR. Org Lett. 2017;19:1966. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Adam W, Groer P, Saha-Möller CR. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 1997;8:833. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martínez I, Andrews AE, Emch JD, Ndakala AJ, Wang J, Howell AR. Org Lett. 2003;5:399. doi: 10.1021/ol020202v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) Navarre L, Darses S, Genet JP. Adv Synth Catal. 2006;348:317. [Google Scholar]; (b) Navarre L, Darses S, Genet JP. Chem Commun. 2004:1108. doi: 10.1039/b402928c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES