Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2017 Dec 7;24(1):101–104. doi: 10.1002/chem.201705273

Resolving a Reactive Organometallic Intermediate from Dynamic Directing Group Systems by Selective C−H Activation

Fredrik Schaufelberger 1, Brian J J Timmer 1, Olof Ramström 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5836886  PMID: 29149517

Abstract

Catalyst discovery from systems of potential precursors is a challenging endeavor. Herein, a new strategy applying dynamic chemistry to the identification of catalyst precursors from C−H activation of imines is proposed and evaluated. Using hydroacylation of imines as a model reaction, the selection of an organometallic reactive intermediate from a dynamic imine system, involving many potential directing group/metal entities, is demonstrated. The identity of the amplified reaction intermediate with the best directing group could be resolved in situ by ESI‐MS, and coupling of the procedure to an iterative deconvolution protocol generated a system with high screening efficiency.

Keywords: catalysis, C−H activation, directing group, dynamic chemistry, systems chemistry


Much effort in synthetic organic chemistry is dedicated to the search for new catalytic systems, often discovered through time‐consuming single catalyst screening. To accelerate the discovery of novel catalysts, constitutional dynamic chemistry has emerged as a promising concept.1 Reversible covalent bonds are in this case utilized to allow the thermodynamic or kinetic adaptation of dynamic systems in response to applied selection pressures, resulting in amplification of the systemic constituents that best adapt to the given settings. In principle, this approach of simultaneously generating and evaluating multiple catalysts in one‐pot is ideal for abbreviating discovery times, and the requirement for all catalyst candidates to be synthesized, purified, characterized and evaluated individually is circumvented.2 This concept has previously been explored by us,3 and others,4 showing that catalysts can be rapidly identified using dynamic deconvolution, self‐resolved from dynamic systems, or amplified from binding to transition state analogues.

The direct identification of optimal catalyst‐substrate species, which act as reactive intermediates in the catalyzed transformations, is in this context especially attractive. In situ detection of such intermediates, generated from dynamic systems involving many potential catalysts and substrates, thus provides information of the properties of the catalyst‐substrate entity required for achieving catalytic activation.2g, 5

This challenge has been addressed in the present investigation, in which we describe a dynamic chemistry strategy for efficient identification of a reactive metal–substrate intermediate. The approach relies on dynamic systemic resolution (DSR),6 applying kinetically controlled resolution steps to thermodynamically controlled systems, targeting a metal–substrate complex that provides information as to which metal/substrate combination is able to efficiently initiate a catalytic cycle. Metals, acids and directing groups (DGs) were screened in a model system of selective C−H activation reactions by interruption of the catalytic cycle to amplify the reactive intermediate (Figure 1). This enabled in situ identification of the active complex with the corresponding directing group and metal using ESI‐MS. We furthermore demonstrate the coupling of this method to an iterative deconvolution protocol to provide efficient screening of reaction parameters.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

DG‐based C−H activation of imines with metal catalyst.

DG‐controlled C−H functionalization is a versatile and powerful strategy for synthesis of a range of complex molecular targets.7 However, many studies have shown that even small changes in sterics or electronics of the DGs can lead to significant activity differences.8 Also, the need to attach and detach the DG from the substrate constitutes a significant drawback. In the present study, it was hypothesized that transiently formed DGs based on dynamic covalent bonds can bypass such limitations,9 enabling catalytic DGs when the dynamic exchange processes are sufficiently rapid.

Hydroacylation of aromatic imines with alkenes was chosen as a model reaction for the system,10 projected to involve initial establishment of a transient DG by acid‐catalyzed trans‐imination.11 The metal would subsequently coordinate to the DG and insert into the aldimine C−H bond via oxidative addition, generating a metal hydride intermediate. The rate‐determining step in the catalytic cycle has been proposed to occur after the formation of the intermediate, enabling identification of this species in the process. This type of intermediate has also been observed with several different metals and DGs, for this and similar reactions, and was thus considered suitable for the proof‐of‐concept system.12

The overall hydroacylation process is outlined in Figure 2, indicating the imine exchange and the proposed detectable intermediate. In addition to being identifiable, the intermediate should also be compatible with the conditions of the dynamic process, including the presence of the different amines.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

General scheme of the dynamic directing group‐controlled hydroacylation process.

To evaluate this, a dynamic imine system utilizing acid‐catalyzed transimination was first constructed (Figure 3, top). Imine A1 did not contain a functional DG, but all auxiliary amines 27 were selected to contain well‐established DGs previously used for C−H functionalization processes.8a, 9a, 13 Based on these structures, imines A2A7 formed transiently and under thermodynamic control in the dynamic system.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

DSR of DG system with coupled iterative deconvolution. Numbers in boxes indicate concentration (mm, average values from duplicate experiments) of metal hydride species at −11.2 ppm. Concentrations determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy with PhSiMe3 as internal standard. Conditions: Imine A1 (0.03 mmol), amines 27 (0.015 mmol each), acids (3.0 μmol total), toluene (0.60 mL), 80 °C, Ar, 1 h, then metals (0.015 mmol each), 4 Å MS (20 mg), 80 °C, 30 min.

Next, the dynamic imine system was applied to a mixture of metals and acid co‐catalysts to evaluate the feasibility of the DSR methodology. The use of mixtures of metals and additives in so‐called “shotgun” approaches to catalyst screening have been explored, but well‐working approaches towards structured deconvolution strategies of such mixtures have only recently been proposed.2a, 14 In the present study, a multi‐parameter, iterative deconvolution strategy was used.2a The investigated reagents, eight metal catalysts and eight acids (Figure 3), were divided into pools, which were evaluated pairwise, followed by selection of the best‐performing combination and further division into smaller pools until a hit was found. The metals were selected to encompass both known, working catalysts (IrI, RhI, Pt0, RuII) as well as controls (MnII, ZnII, NiII, CuI).12d, 12e, 15 Likewise, the acids were chosen to obtain a wide spread in pK a, steric bulk and ability for complementary non‐covalent interactions (cf. Supporting Information). For analysis, the expected hydride formation was targeted, since initial experiments following the consumption of the starting materials revealed that only this key product was formed. Thus, the large upfield NMR spectral shift of the imine proton upon transformation into a heavily shielded hydride (typical signals at 0 to −25 ppm), was followed.

The metals and acids were thus separated into pools of four, and the dynamic DG system was subjected to each metal/acid mixture (Figure 3). The alkene substrate was omitted to maximize amplification by preventing catalytic turnover. A short reaction time (30 min) at 80 °C in deoxygenated toluene, with added 4 Å MS to keep the system moisture‐free, was found to produce a small amount of a new organometallic hydridic species, as evidenced by the appearance of a quartet at −11.2 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum (Round 1). No new major signals appeared in the indicative regions of the spectrum, other than amine‐containing compound signal shifts due to metal complexation. The hydride peak could be observed in the two pools containing Ru, Rh, Ni and Ir. Furthermore, one acid combination proved slightly superior to the other, leading to the selection of this pool and dividing the metals and acids into four new pools each containing two species of each type (Round 2). From this round, the hydridic species could only be observed in pools with Rh and Ru. Further selection of the best acid combination and a final pool split (Round 3) allowed assignment of the key metal as Rh (M7) and the optimum acid as benzoic acid (B2). As a control, omitting the acid led to complete loss of activity in the system.

In view of the wealth of literature precedence, identification of the Rh species as the metal most proficient at performing the oxidative addition step of the hydroacylation process was unsurprising. Correspondingly, benzoic acid has also been utilized as a highly efficient co‐catalyst in a number of Rh‐catalyzed hydroacylations.16

Given that the organometallic intermediates have high molecular weights in comparison to the initial imines and DG‐bearing amines, ESI‐MS was selected as a straightforward methodology for identifying the key Rh−H containing species observable from the system. Indeed, direct monitoring of the reaction system involving species B2/M7 with ESI‐MS in positive mode allowed observation of the C−H activated product P2 with a relatively strong [P2‐H]+ signal (Figure S1). Furthermore, an intense peak originating from the [P2‐Cl]+ signal could be observed. A very small concentration of potential product P3 was otherwise the only additional organometallic intermediate observable.

Since the ESI‐MS signals of C−H activated intermediates have the same mass as the unactivated metal–DG complexes, NMR spectroscopy was also employed for complementary qualitative analysis. Performing the reaction in [D8]toluene allowed for more accurate 1H and 31P NMR analysis, indicating a process with relatively low amounts of side products despite the complexity of the system (Figures S2–S4). It was thus again evident that essentially only one single new species was formed, and this intermediate was assigned as product P2. These results show that coupling of the DSR process to an iterative deconvolution protocol allowed for efficient reaction parameter screening and in situ identification of the optimal DG, metal and acid for inducing oxidative addition. A total of 448 different reaction conditions were thus screened with just twelve reactions.

Although the system was capable of selectively resolving product P2 in the presence of close structural analogues, higher concentrations of free amines were suspected to affect the resolution efficiency. 1H NMR monitoring of product P2 over time indicated rapid C−H activation over the first 30 min, followed by a short plateau, before the reaction intermediate started to decompose (Figure S4). To test if the amine concentration was detrimental to product stability, the size of the dynamic imine system was increased and reduced by addition or removal of DG components (Table S2). This resulted in a clear correlation between total amine concentration and resolution efficiency.

Following these conclusions, a new approach to obtain higher efficiency was devised (Scheme 1). All relevant DG‐containing free amines were thus condensed with slightly substoichiometric amounts of benzaldehyde with 4 Å MS to obtain a dynamic imine system with lower free amine content, yet retaining the dynamic properties of the exchange process. Indeed, C−H activation with Rh(PPh3)3Cl from this system provided P2 as the sole new product in a much‐improved 81 % yield over 30 min.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Direct condensation followed by selective C−H activation of dynamic directing group system.

The presented selection strategy provided information on which metal/DG combinations were capable of inducing the oxidative addition step in the catalytic cycle. The overall hydroacylation reaction was therefore carried out using the selected intermediate to verify its function. It could thus be independently confirmed that the amplified organometallic species P2 is indeed an intermediate for a hydroacylation reaction.17 When compound P2 was synthesized separately (Scheme 2), and treated with 1‐octene in deoxygenated toluene at 130 °C, followed by hydrolysis with aqueous HCl, the expected ketone was obtained in good overall yield starting from imine A2.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Conversion of intermediate P2 into hydroacylation product P‐ket.

In summary, we have demonstrated a new strategy applying dynamic chemistry to reactive organometallic intermediate discovery. A dynamic systemic resolution process could be used to amplify an intermediate in a catalytic cycle, and enabled direct identification of active metal/directing groups in a complex system. Furthermore, judicious coupling of this amplification method to an iterative deconvolution protocol led to powerful resolving efficiency in parameter space. The organometallic complex P2 is by far the most intricate and reactive structure resolved from a dynamic system. This study thus additionally demonstrates that with appropriate optimization and choice of parameters, even transient or metastable species can be resolved from dynamic systems.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

This study was in part supported by the Swedish Research Council and the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 289033. F.S. thanks the Royal Institute of Technology for an Excellence Award.

F. Schaufelberger, B. J. J. Timmer, O. Ramström, Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 101.

References

  • 1. 
  • 1a. Zhang W., Dynamic Covalent Chemistry: Principles, Reactions and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2017; [Google Scholar]
  • 1b. Azcune I., Odriozola I., Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 84, 147–160; [Google Scholar]
  • 1c. Brachvogel R.-C., von Delius M., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 22, 3662–3670; [Google Scholar]
  • 1d. Lehn J.-M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3276–3289; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 3326–3340; [Google Scholar]
  • 1e. Jin Y., Yu C., Denman R. J., Zhang W., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6634–6654; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1f. Herrmann A., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1899–1933; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1g. Hu L., Schaufelberger F., Timmer B. J. J., Flos M. A., Ramström O., in Kirk-Othmer Encycl. Chem. Technol., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014, pp. 1–25; [Google Scholar]
  • 1h. Misuraca M. C., Moulin E., Ruff Y., Giuseppone N., New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 3336–3349; [Google Scholar]
  • 1i. Wilson A., Gasparini G., Matile S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1948–1962; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1j. Dydio P., Breuil P.-A. R., Reek J. N. H., Isr. J. Chem. 2013, 53, 61–74; [Google Scholar]
  • 1k. Barboiu M., Constitutional Dynamic Chemistry, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012; [Google Scholar]
  • 1l. Gasparini G., Dal Molin M., Prins L. J., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 13, 2429–2440; [Google Scholar]
  • 1m. Miller B. L., Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry: In Drug Discovery, Bioorganic Chemistry, and Materials Science John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2010; [Google Scholar]
  • 1n. Reek J. N. H., Otto S., Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. 
  • 2a. Wolf E., Richmond E., Moran J., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2501–2505; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2b. Müller C. A., Markert C., Teichert A. M., Pfaltz A., Chem. Commun. 2009, 1607–1618; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2c. Hagemeyer A., Jandeleit B., Liu Y., Poojary D. M., Turner H. W., A. F. Volpe  Jr , Weinberg W. H., Appl. Catal. A 2001, 221, 23–43; [Google Scholar]
  • 2d. Reetz M. T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 284–310; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 292–320; [Google Scholar]
  • 2e. Harris R. F., Nation A. J., Copeland G. T., Miller S. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11270–11271; [Google Scholar]
  • 2f. Francis M. B., Jacobsen E. N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 937–941; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 987–991; [Google Scholar]
  • 2g. Hinderling C., Chen P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2253–2256; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2393–2396. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. 
  • 3a. Schaufelberger F., Ramström O., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7836–7839; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3b. Schaufelberger F., Ramström O., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12735–12740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. 
  • 4a. Kannappan R., Nicholas K. M., ACS Comb. Sci. 2013, 15, 90–100; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4b. Gasparini G., Prins L. J., Scrimin P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2475–2479; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 2509–2513; [Google Scholar]
  • 4c. Brisig B., Sanders J. K. M., Otto S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1270–1273; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1308–1311. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. 
  • 5a. Hopkinson M. N., Gómez-Suárez A., Teders M., Sahoo B., Glorius F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4361–4366; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 4434–4439; [Google Scholar]
  • 5b. Fleischer I., Pfaltz A., Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 95–99; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5c. Wassenaar J., Jansen E., Zeist W.-J. van, Bickelhaupt F. M., Siegler M. A., Spek A. L., Reek J. N. H., Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 417–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. 
  • 6a. Hu L., Zhang Y., Ramström O., Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11065–11065; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6b. Zhang Y., Ramström O., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 3288–3291; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6c. Hu L., Ramström O., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3792–3794; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6d. Sakulsombat M., Zhang Y., Ramström O., Top. Curr. Chem. 2011, 322, 55–86; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6e. Zhang Y., Angelin M., Larsson R., Albers A., Simons A., Ramström O., Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8457–8459; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6f. Vongvilai P., Ramström O., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14419–14425; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6g. Vongvilai P., Angelin M., Larsson R., Ramström O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 948–950; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 966–968; [Google Scholar]
  • 6h. Larsson R., Pei Z., Ramström O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3716–3718; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3802–3804. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. 
  • 7a. Wencel-Delord J., Droge T., Liu F., Glorius F., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4740–4761; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7b. Newhouse T., Baran P. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3362–3374; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 3422–3435; [Google Scholar]
  • 7c. Shilov A. E., Shul′pin G. B., Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2879–2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. 
  • 8a. Xu Y., Yan G., Ren Z., Dong G., Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 829–834; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8b. See Y. Y., Herrmann A. T., Aihara Y., Baran P. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13776–13779; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8c. Affron D. P., Davis O. A., Bull J. A., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4956–4959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. 
  • 9a. Sun H., Guimond N., Huang Y., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 8389-8397; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9b. Zhang F.-L., Hong K., Li T.-J., Park H., Yu J.-Q., Science 2016, 351, 252–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. 
  • 10a. Ghosh A., Johnson K. F., Vickerman K. L., Walker J. A., Stanley L. M., Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 639–644; [Google Scholar]
  • 10b. Murphy S. K., Dong V. M., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13645–13649; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10c. Jun C.-H., Jo E.-A., Park J.-W., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 12, 1869–1881. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. 
  • 11a. Yang J., Seto Y. W., Yoshikai N., ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3054–3057; [Google Scholar]
  • 11b. Jun C.-H., Hong J.-B., Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 887–889. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. 
  • 12a. Mo F., Dong G., Science 2014, 345, 68–72; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12b. Marcé P., Godard C., Feliz M., Yáñez X., Bo C., Castillón S., Organometallics 2009, 28, 2976–2985; [Google Scholar]
  • 12c. Colby D. A., Bergman R. G., Ellman J. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3645–3651; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12d. Ohtaka A., Kato N., Kurosawa H., Organometallics 2002, 21, 5464–5466; [Google Scholar]
  • 12e. Albinati A., Arz C., Pregosin P. S., J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 335, 379–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tran L. D., Daugulis O., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5188–5191; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 5278–5281. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. 
  • 14a. Bellini R., Chikkali S. H., Berthon-Gelloz G., Reek J. N. H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7342–7345; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 7480–7483; [Google Scholar]
  • 14b. Robbins D. W., Hartwig J. F., Science 2011, 333, 1423–1427; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14c. Wieland J., Breit B., Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 832–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li B., Roisnel T., Darcel C., Dixneuf P. H., Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 10934–10937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. 
  • 16a. Jo E.-A., Jun C.-H., Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3338–3340; [Google Scholar]
  • 16b. Jun C.-H., Lee D.-Y., Lee H., Hong J.-B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3070–3072; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3214–3216. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Suggs J. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 489–489. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary


Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES