Abstract
Background: Women’s parity has been associated with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear, however, whether it reflects biological effects of childbearing or uncontrolled socio-economic and lifestyle factors associated with childrearing. We assessed the association between number of children and incident CVD outcomes separately in women and men.
Methods: In 2004–08, the nationwide China Kadoorie Biobank recruited 0.5 million individuals aged 30–79 years from 10 diverse regions. During 7 years of follow-up, 24 432 incident cases of coronary heart disease (CHD) and 35 736 of stroke were recorded among 489 762 individuals without prior CVD. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CHD and stroke associated with number of children.
Results: Overall, 98% of all participants had children and the mean number of children declined progressively from four in older participants to one or two in younger participants. Compared with childless women, women with children had an increased risk of CHD, but not of stroke [HR (95% CI): 1.14 (1.00; 1.30) and 1.03 (0.92; 1.16)]. Corresponding results for men were 1.20 (1.06; 1.35) and 1.13 (1.03; 1.24), respectively. In individuals with children, there was a log-linear association between number of children and CVD outcomes; in women, each additional child was associated with adjusted HRs of 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) for CHD and 1.02 (1.01; 1.03) for stroke, similar in magnitude to that in men [1.03 (1.01; 1.04) for CHD and 1.02 (1.01; 1.03) for stroke].
Conclusion: In Chinese adults, the association between the number of children and risk of CHD and stroke was similar between men and women, suggesting that factors associated with parenthood and childrearing are more likely to affect the risk of CVD outcomes than factors associated with childbearing.
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Children, China, Men, Parenthood, Women
Key Messages
In individuals with at least one child, which comprises over 95% of our study population, each additional child was associated an increased risk of CVD outcomes of 2–3% in both men and women.
Despite striking changes in reproductive patterns in China over the past several decades, there was no clear evidence of generational or regional differences in the association between parenthood and CVD outcomes.
The similarity between women and men in the association between number of children and CVD outcomes suggests that socio-economic, lifestyle or other factors associated with parenthood and childrearing may play more important roles in affecting the risk of CVD outcomes than biological effects associated with childbearing.
Introduction
Pregnancy is associated with substantial physiological changes affecting multiple cardiometabolic traits and pathways that may lead to increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life.1–4 Several studies, mostly in Western populations, have investigated the association between parity (i.e. number of live births) and risk of CVD in women, but the results have been inconsistent. Several studies have reported a J- or U-shaped association between parity and CVD, with nulliparity or multiparity associated with an increased risk,5–10 whereas others showed no such association.11–13 Most previous studies were small in size, and adjustment for possible confounding factors has been variable. Moreover, the discordance of findings has raised the discussion as to whether any associations are the result of biological factors related to childbearing, or due to socio-economic, lifestyle or other factors associated with parenthood and childrearing.8,14,15 A few studies have also examined the association between having children and risk of CVD in men only, or in women and men simultaneously, again with discordant results.6,8,14–17
Evidence on the association between parenthood and CVD is particularly relevant to China, where the incidence of CVD, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD), is increasing and reproductive patterns are changing, yet are still importantly different from those in the West. There have been striking intergenerational changes in reproductive patterns in China, due partly to the rapid socio-economic developments occurring in China and partly to introduction of the one-child-per-family policy in the late 1970s which set strict regulations regarding family size.18 Compared with older generations, individuals born in more recent decades tend to have fewer children and, particularly in urban areas, increased mean age at first birth. Despite this, there is still limited evidence about the relevance to CVD risk of number of children in a Chinese population, overall or in different population subgroups.
We examined the relationship between parenthood and risk of CVD outcomes, CHD and stroke in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB)19 of 500 000 individuals recruited from 10 diverse regions in China. To help distinguish between biological factors related to childbearing and socio-economic, lifestyle or other factors associated with childrearing, we examined the associations separately among women and men in CKB.
Methods
Baseline survey
Detailed information about the study design and procedures of CKB has been reported previously.19 Briefly, 302 669 women and 210 222 men aged 30–79 years were recruited from five urban and five rural areas of China between June 2004 and July 2008. At the study assessment clinics, trained health workers administered a laptop-based questionnaire that covered detailed information on demographic and socio-economic status, lifestyle factors, personal and family medical history, and women’s reproductive patterns. Participants were asked how many ever-born biological children that they had and this was the main exposure variable for the present study. Physical measurements were taken and a blood sample was collected for long-term storage. Overall, ∼30% of individuals invited participated in the study and all provided written informed consent. Local, national and international ethical approval was obtained. Following the completion of the baseline survey, two resurveys of 5–6% randomly selected surviving participants were undertaken, using procedures similar to those at study baseline. The kappa value, comparing the reported number of children at baseline and at the first resurvey, was 0.93, indicating good repeatability.
Follow-up for morbidity and mortality
Study participants have been followed up for cause-specific morbidity and mortality through linkage with regional disease and death registers and with the new national health insurance (HI) system. Causes of death are sought chiefly from official death certificates and are, where necessary, supplemented by reviews of available medical records or, for a few (<5%) who died without any prior medical attention, by verbal autopsy. Data linkage with HI agencies is carried out every 6 months in each region, and all hospitalized events occurring in that last half-year are retrieved for matched study participants. At present, ∼98% of the study population is covered by the HI system. Active follow-up is performed on an annual basis to minimize losses to follow-up. All deaths and diseases are coded using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and are blinded to baseline exposures. Follow-up information is complete for 99.4% of the participants. The primary study endpoints in the present study were incident CHD (I20–I25) or stroke (I60–I61, I63–I64). Hemorrhagic stroke (I61) and ischemic stroke (I63) were used as secondary endpoints. Participants contributed only the first outcome (whether non-fatal or fatal) experienced during follow-up. Individuals (n = 23 129) with a prior history of CHD or stroke at baseline were excluded from the present analyses.
Statistical analyses
Baseline characteristics were both unadjusted and stratified by age at risk and area of residence. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident CHD and stroke by number of children in women and in men separately. The Cox proportional hazards assumption was checked using log cumulative hazard plots and appeared to be reasonable. For comparisons involving more than two groups, CIs were estimated using floating absolute risks, enabling valid comparisons between any two groups, even if neither is the baseline group.20 In further analyses, we obtained the HR and CI for childless individuals compared with individuals with children. Moreover, in analyses restricted to individuals who had at least one child, we estimated the HRs and CIs per additional child.
Model I was stratified by age at risk and area of residence. Subsequent models were adjusted for variables that could either act as confounders or as effect modifiers. Model II was additionally adjusted for level of attained education and household income. Model III was further adjustment for smoking status, alcohol use, physical activity, systolic blood pressure (SBP), history of hypertension, body mass index (BMI) and history of diabetes. To address the impact of the steady fall in family size across successive birth cohorts (without clear inflection impact of the one-child-per-family policy),18 we obtained the sex-specific HRs and CIs for incident CHD and stroke associated with the number of children and per additional child, separately by study region and by birth cohort and their combination. Further subgroup analyses were conducted to obtain the sex-specific HRs and CIs for incident CHD and stroke per additional child defined at various sub-populations (age group, education, BMI, smoking status, history of diabetes and history of hypertension). All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 and R version 3.1.2.
Results
Of the 489 762 participants included, the mean (SD) baseline age was 51 (11) years, and 59% were women. Nearly all individuals (98%) in both sexes reported having at least one biological child, with about third each having one (37%), two (33%) or more than two children (30%). There has been a progressive decline in the number of children across successive generations in both sexes, with a mean of four children for individuals born in 1925–35, three for those born in 1935–45, two for those born in 1945–55 and one or two among those born after 1955. In both sexes, those with one child only were generally younger, had a higher level of education and a higher household income as compared with individuals with more than one child or without children (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). Although individuals with one child also had the lowest SBP and the lowest prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, stratification by age and study area greatly attenuated these differences (Supplementary Table 3, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). The prevalence of ever regular smoking and weekly alcohol use were considerably higher in men than in women (86% vs 5% and 34% vs 2%, respectively), but otherwise similar across categories of number of children. Rates of miscarriage and stillbirth were much higher in women without children compared with women with children (Supplementary Table 1, available as Supplementary data at IJE online).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of study participants by number of children
| Total | 0 children | 1 child | 2 children | 3 children | 4 children | ≥5 children | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (% women) | 489 762 (59.1) | 9959 (39.9) | 179 583 (57.7) | 159 527 (59.9) | 84 011 (60.4) | 35 802 (62.0) | 20 880 (64.4) |
| Rural, % | 56.8 | 52.0 | 35.6 | 69.6 | 70.0 | 68.0 | 71.9 |
| Age, years | 51.1 (10.5) | 49.2 (11.9) | 45.1 (7.3) | 50.3 (9.2) | 57.1 (9.4) | 62.3 (8.5) | 66.2 (7.3) |
| Education level, % | |||||||
| Primary or below | 50.8 | 48.8 | 28.6 | 55.4 | 68.9 | 79.1 | 87.1 |
| Secondary or above | 49.2 | 51.2 | 71.4 | 44.6 | 31.1 | 20.9 | 12.9 |
| Household income, % | |||||||
| Low | 9.8 | 22.8 | 4.4 | 7.4 | 14.0 | 22.1 | 30.0 |
| Middle | 47.4 | 46.2 | 40.0 | 49.4 | 55.0 | 54.7 | 54.2 |
| High | 42.8 | 31.0 | 55.6 | 43.2 | 31.1 | 23.2 | 15.8 |
| Current smoking, % | |||||||
| Women | 2.3 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 5.2 |
| Men | 62.0 | 59.9 | 63.8 | 62.6 | 60.2 | 57.2 | 56.6 |
| Weekly alcohol use, % | |||||||
| Women | 2.1 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.4 |
| Men | 33.9 | 27.1 | 42.6 | 31.2 | 27.0 | 24.3 | 20.5 |
| Physical activity, MET hours/day | 18.0 (10.7, 30.5) | 16.8 (10.3, 28.9) | 21.0 (13.4, 32.8) | 18.9 (11.2, 32.4) | 15.0 (9.0, 27.1) | 12.2 (8.4, 22.5) | 10.8 (7.2, 18.0) |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 130.6 (21.1) | 129.6 (21.8) | 125.4 (18.3) | 130.5 (20.4) | 135.4 (22.2) | 139.3 (23.4) | 142.3 (24.2) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.6 (3.4) | 22.8 (3.6) | 23.8 (3.2) | 23.6 (3.3) | 23.4 (3.4) | 23.3 (3.5) | 23.1 (3.6) |
| History of hypertension, % | 9.9 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 9.7 | 13.8 | 16.4 | 17.0 |
| History of diabetes, % | 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Still birth and abortion, % | |||||||
| History of stillbirth | 6.5 | 72.0 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 8.1 | 11.2 | 13.9 |
| History of induced abortion | 52.8 | 88.2 | 70.7 | 47.6 | 37.8 | 33.8 | 29.0 |
| History of spontaneous abortion | 9.8 | 75.8 | 5.1 | 9.0 | 11.7 | 14.6 | 18.1 |
| Age at first birth, years | 23.4 (3.2) | – | 25.0 (3.0) | 23.1 (2.8) | 22.1 (2.7) | 21.4 (2.6) | 20.6 (2.5) |
Values are percentages for categorical variables, and means and standard deviation for continuous variables, except for physical activity, where median and 25th and 75th percentiles are shown. MET, metabolic equivalent.
During a median of 7.1 years (Q1: 6.2; Q3:8.1) of follow-up, 24 432 incident CHD events (14 440 in women and 9 992 in men) and 35 736 stroke events (19 925 in women and 15 811 in men) were recorded. Women and men without children were at increased risk of CHD as compared with individuals with children (Supplementary Table 4, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). In analyses stratified by age at risk and study area, and adjusted for socio-economic, physical and lifestyle factors, the HRs associated with not having children as compared with having children were 1.14 (1.00; 1.30) in women and 1.20 (1.06; 1.35) in men. In individuals with at least one child, there was a log-linear association between number of children and the risk of CHD in both women and men (Supplementary Table 4, available as Supplementary data at IJE online, and Figure 1). The HRs (95% CI) for CHD associated with having two children, compared with one, were 1.05 (1.01; 1.08) in women and 1.04 (1.00; 1.08) in men, and increased up to 1.17 (1.11; 1.25) in women and 1.18 (1.09; 1.28) in men with five or more children, respectively. In analyses in individuals with at least one child, each additional child was associated with a 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) increased risk of CHD in women and 1.03 (1.01; 1.04) in men. Results were broadly similar between study birth cohorts and other population subgroups (Table 2 and Figure 2). There was one exception: the region-specific analyses suggested that the association between parenthood and CHD risk was stronger in rural than in urban women (Table 2 and Figure 2)—a result that primarily seemed to be driven by the absence of an apparent relationship in urban women born before 1955, but not among those born in or after 1955 (Supplementary Table 5, available as Supplementary data at IJE online).
Figure 1.
Adjusteda hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident coronary heart disease and stroke associated with number of children aAnalyses are stratified by age at risk and study area, and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index and history of diabetes. The hazard ratios (HRs) are plotted on a floating absolute scale. Each square (solid for women and blank for men) has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. Vertical lines indicate the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Table 2.
Adjusteda hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident coronary heart disease and stroke associated with number of children by region and birth cohort
| n events | 0 children | 1 child | 2 children | 3 children | ≥4 children | Per additional childb* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHD | |||||||||
| Women | Rural | 7496 | 1.46 (1.20; 1.77) | 1.00 (0.90; 1.11) | 1.11 (1.05; 1.16) | 1.17 (1.12; 1.22) | 1.31 (1.24; 1.38) | 1.04 (1.02; 1.05) | |
| Urban | 6944 | 1.08 (0.91; 1.28) | 1.00 (0.93; 1.07) | 1.02 (0.97; 1.07) | 0.98 (0.93; 1.04) | 0.99 (0.92; 1.07) | 0.99 (0.97; 1.02) | ||
| Men | Rural | 5431 | 1.44 (1.26; 1.64) | 1.00 (0.90; 1.11) | 1.12 (1.06; 1.18) | 1.19 (1.13; 1.26) | 1.24 (1.16; 1.32) | 1.03 (1.00; 1.05) | |
| Urban | 4561 | 1.07 (0.85; 1.36) | 1.00 (0.92; 1.09) | 0.99 (0.94; 1.05) | 1.03 (0.96; 1.11) | 1.15 (1.05; 1.27) | 1.03 (1.00; 1.06) | ||
| Women | ≥1955 | 3800 | 1.15 (0.89; 1.48) | 1.00 (0.91; 1.10) | 1.06 (1.01; 1.11) | 1.10 (0.99; 1.21) | 1.19 (1.01; 1.41) | 1.03 (0.99; 1.07) | |
| <1955 | 10 640 | 1.20 (1.03; 1.39) | 1.00 (0.93; 1.08) | 1.02 (0.98; 1.06) | 1.04 (1.00; 1.07) | 1.11 (1.06; 1.16) | 1.03 (1.01; 1.05) | ||
| Men | ≥1955 | 2406 | 1.39 (1.13; 1.71) | 1.00 (0.90; 1.11) | 1.05 (0.98; 1.13) | 1.10 (0.95; 1.26) | 1.25 (0.97; 1.60) | 1.03 (0.99; 1.07) | |
| <1955 | 7586 | 1.23 (1.06; 1.41) | 1.00 (0.92; 1.08) | 1.02 (0.98; 1.07) | 1.08 (1.04; 1.13) | 1.15 (1.09; 1.21) | 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) | ||
| Stroke | |||||||||
| Women | Rural | 10 782 | 1.08 (0.90; 1.29) | 1.00 (0.92; 1.08) | 1.04 (1.01; 1.09) | 1.02 (0.98; 1.06) | 1.09 (1.04; 1.14) | 1.02 (1.00; 1.03) | |
| Urban | 9143 | 1.04 (0.89; 1.21) | 1.00 (0.94; 1.07) | 1.01 (0.97; 1.06) | 1.08 (1.03; 1.13) | 1.06 (1.00; 1.12) | 1.01 (0.99; 1.03) | ||
| Men | Rural | 8987 | 1.26 (1.14; 1.40) | 1.00 (0.93; 1.08) | 1.03 (0.98; 1.07) | 1.05 (1.01; 1.09) | 1.10 (1.05; 1.16) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.03) | |
| Urban | 6824 | 0.98 (0.80; 1.19) | 1.00 (0.93; 1.07) | 0.97 (0.93; 1.02) | 1.04 (0.98; 1.10) | 1.12 (1.04; 1.20) | 1.03 (1.01; 1.05) | ||
| Women | ≥1955 | 5400 | 1.03 (0.83; 1.29) | 1.00 (0.93; 1.08) | 1.09 (1.05; 1.13) | 0.99 (0.91; 1.07) | 1.21 (1.05; 1.40) | 1.04 (1.01; 1.08) | |
| <1955 | 14 525 | 1.07 (0.93; 1.22) | 1.00 (0.94; 1.07) | 1.00 (0.96; 1.04) | 1.04 (1.01; 1.07) | 1.06 (1.02; 1.10) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.03) | ||
| Men | ≥1955 | 3558 | 1.01 (0.84; 1.21) | 1.00 (0.92; 1.09) | 0.94 (0.89; 0.99) | 0.89 (0.80; 1.00) | 1.16 (0.95; 1.42) | 0.99 (0.94; 1.05) | |
| <1955 | 12 253 | 1.26 (1.13; 1.40) | 1.00 (0.94; 1.06) | 1.03 (0.99; 1.07) | 1.08 (1.04; 1.12) | 1.13 (1.09; 1.18) | 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) |
aModels stratified by age at risk and study area, and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index and history of diabetes. bAnalyses are restricted to individuals with at least one child. *P-values for heterogeneity by region and birth cohort for CHD were 0.004 and 0.78 in women and 0.81 and 0.91 in men. Corresponding P-values for stroke were 0.87, 0.17, 0.31 and 0.27, respectively.
Figure 2.
Adjusteda hazard ratios for incident CHD per additional child by baseline characteristics in women and men aAnalyses are stratified by age at risk and study area, and, where appropriate, adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index and history of diabetes. Each closed square (solid for women and blank for men) represents the risk of CHD per additional child, with its area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The dotted vertical line indicates the overall CHD risk per additional child; the diamond indicates the overall estimate and its 95% CI. Individuals without children are excluded.
Compared with those having children, individuals without children had significantly increased risk of stroke in men but not in women; HRs in analyses stratified by age at risk and study area and adjusted for socio-economic, physical and lifestyle factors were 1.03 (0.92; 1.16) in women and 1.13 (1.03; 1.24) in men (Supplementary Table 4, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). In individuals with children, there was a log-linear association between number of children and the risk of stroke; compared with one child, the HRs for stroke associated with having two children were 1.03 (1.00; 1.07) in women and 1.00 (0.97; 1.03) in men, rising to 1.15 (1.09; 1.21) in women and 1.14 (1.07; 1.21) in men for having five or more children. Analyses by stroke subtype yielded similar patterns for ischemic stroke, but weaker associations for hemorrhagic stroke (Supplementary Table 6, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). In analyses restricted to individuals with children, each one additional child increased the risk of stroke by 1.02 (1.01; 1.03) in women and men alike. Associations were largely similar across various population subgroups, including different age groups and study regions (Table 2, Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 5, available as Supplementary data at IJE online).
Figure 3.
Adjusteda hazard ratios for incident stroke per additional child by baseline characteristics in women and men. aAnalyses are stratified by age at risk and study area, and, where appropriate, adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index and history of diabetes. Each closed square (solid for women and blank for men) represents the risk of stroke per additional child, with its area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The dotted vertical line indicates the overall stroke risk per additional child; the diamond indicates the overall estimate and its 95% CI. Individuals without children are excluded.
Discussion
In this large prospective study of 300 000 women and 200 000 men from 10 diverse urban and rural regions of China, we found that childlessness and, among individuals with children, number of children were associated with an increased risk of CVD outcomes. In individuals with at least one child, which comprised over 95% of our study population, each additional child was associated with a 2–3% increased risk of CVD outcomes in both men and women. These results were not accounted for by a range of socio-economic, physical and lifestyle factors, and were broadly similar across major demographic and clinical subgroups.
China has faced a dramatic fall in family size in the second half of the 20th century, much of which had already occurred before the one-child-per-family policy was imposed in 1979.18 This was likely due to improved education, better health-care provision and economic growth. Between 1970 and 1979, the average number of live births per women halved from 5.5 to 2.8, with further, more gradual declines until the mid-nineties and with fertility rates stagnating at around 1.6 child per women since then.21 Participants from the present study were born in 1925–78 (reaching childbearing age at around 1945–98) and experienced the major shifts in fertility rates differently during their reproductive lives.18 Despite this, there was limited evidence of a major impact of generational and regional differences in reproductive patterns on the association between parenthood and the risk of CVD outcomes.
Low fertility rates, together with increased longevity, have led to an increasing number of elderly people and substantial demographic imbalances, especially in urban China.22 To halt population ageing, the Chinese government has recently relaxed the law to a universal two-child family policy. It remains to be seen whether this will have any major impact on the fertility rates or whether China has adopted a small-family culture comparable to that seen in many other countries in East Asia where fertility rates are among the lowest in the world—1.4 in Japan, 1.2 in Singapore and South-Korea, and 1.1 in Hong Kong—21 even in the absence of strict family-planning policies. Similarly, whereas it is to be expected that the one-child-per-family policy has contributed to the steady increase in the male-to-female ratio at birth, largely because of sex-selective abortion, many other Asian countries with declining fertility rates and a traditional preference for sons are also seeing sex-ratio imbalances.22
Most previous studies examining the link between parenthood and cardiovascular health have focused on women only. In general,5–10 yet not uniformly,11–13 they have shown a J-shaped or U-shaped association between number of children and risk of CVD outcomes, with those without children or having many children being at higher risk compared with women with one or two children. In men, evidence for an association between number of offspring and the risk of CVD outcomes is limited and only few studies explored the relationship between number of offspring and CVD outcomes in women and men simultaneously.6,8,14–17 A prospective study on fatherhood and CVD risk, including 138 000 men from a US population and 3100 CVD deaths, found that childless men had 17% higher risk of CVD mortality than men with children but, among men with children, no association was found between the number of children and CVD risk.17 Cross-sectional analyses of the British Women’s Heart and Health Study and the British Regional Heart Study among a total of 8000 individuals found that, after full adjustment, the number of children was associated with prevalent CHD in women but not in men.15 Furthermore, the Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study II, including 63 000 women (1900 CVD deaths) and 72 000 men (4600 CVD deaths), showed a J-shaped association between number of children and risk of CVD mortality in both women and men.16 The association, however, was most apparent among individuals with eight or more children—a family size which is uncommon in most parts of the world.
Two previous studies in a Chinese population reported inconsistent findings on association between number of children and risk of CVD.6,13 In a prospective study among 250 000 female Shanghai textile workers born in 1925–58, no association was found between the number of live births and risk of CVD death.13 By contrast, in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study, including 75 000 women and 2300 incident cases of stroke, women with more pregnancies or live births were at significantly increased risk of stroke, with women having five or more children being at a 25% higher risk of stroke than women with only one live birth.6 Findings were similar in the cross-sectional examination of the association between the prevalence of stroke in these women and their husbands. The present study included a much larger number of participants and over 60 000 well-characterized incident cases of CHD and stroke, and provides the largest and most comprehensive analyses to date on the association between number of children and risk of CVD outcomes in Chinese men and women.
Pregnancy induces marked alterations in the cardiometabolic system including increased insulin resistance, weight gain, lipid changes and up-regulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system.1–4 These metabolic changes are of short-term benefit for the mother and infant, as they support the growth of the foetus and prepare the mother’s body for breastfeeding. It is, however, conceivable that successive pregnancies could result in cumulative adverse metabolic changes and ultimately lead to an increased risk of CVD.23,24 While biologically plausible, this is not supported by our study findings, which show very similar J-shaped patterns of association in men and women. Instead, the interplay of several competing socio-economic, behavioural factors associated with parenthood and childrearing may be more likely to underlie the link between parenthood and CVD outcomes.25–27 Children might induce a healthier lifestyle in their parents and adult children may also provide important social and material support to their parents as they age. The latter is supported by findings from previous research which showed that a higher socio-economic status of adult children is related to a reduced risk of parental mortality, including mortality of circulatory diseases.28,29 These benefits of having children might, however, be offset by an increased likelihood of accumulated financial, physical and mental pressures seen in large families (such as reduced leisure time and physical activity, increased intake of cheaper and unhealthier foods, and less sleep).25–27 Individuals with a limited number of children may therefore be best situated in terms of long-term benefits for CVD, because personal resources may be less likely to be depleted and adequate support from their children may still be received. The increased risk of CVD outcomes in women and men without children might be a consequence of the limited support otherwise provided by children or, alternatively, could be the result of health behaviours or health conditions related to infertility that also might increase the risk of CVD outcomes.23,30
The strengths of this study include the very large sample size, detailed information on reproductive and other lifestyle-related factors, and the ability to explore the associations simultaneously in women and men. Whereas the study is not necessarily nationally representative, factors affecting study recruitment are unlikely to be effect modifiers of the relationships studied here. Furthermore, the inclusion of large numbers of individuals from diverse regions throughout China with different levels of exposures allows generalizable and reliable assessments of the association in Chinese women and men. Our findings were robust for adjustment for several demographic, socio-economic, physiological and lifestyle characteristics, some of which, such as household income, physical activity and BMI, could act both as confounders and as effect mediators. Since adjustment for effect mediators generally attenuates the effect estimates, our results might be conservative and underestimate the true association between parenthood and the risk of CVD outcomes. A limitation of our study is the lack of information on the underlying reasons for having children or being childless. One possible explanation for the higher risk of CVD among childless individuals is reverse causality; i.e. certain underlying health conditions related to CVD may have affected an individual’s decision or ability to have children. Indeed, in our study, rates of still birth and spontaneous abortion were higher among childless women as compared with women with children, suggesting that biological factors related to fertility might be involved. Women and men without children were also less likely to have ever been married than their counterparts with children. In China, marriage is virtually universal and extra-marital childbearing is low. Hence, never been married may not only be a social factor, but could also be a consequence of poor health, as well as an influence on health. Whereas adjustment for socio-economic, physical and lifestyle factors had limited impact on the observed associations, residual confounding by other factors not accounted for in our analyses (particularly social or psychological factors), which may be population-specific, cannot be excluded entirely.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that, compared with one child, childlessness and a greater number of children are associated with an increased risk of CVD outcomes in Chinese women and men. Whereas biological factors of childbearing cannot be ruled out completely, the similarity between men and women suggests that complex interrelationships between socio-economic, lifestyle or other factors related to parenthood and childrearing may be more important contributors.
Funding
Baseline survey: Kadoorie Charitable Foundation, Hong Kong. Long-term continuation: UK Wellcome Trust (088158/Z/09/Z, 104085/Z/14/Z), Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAI09B01, 2012–14), Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (81390541). The British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK provide core funding to the Oxford CTSU. This work was also supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81390541, No. 81390544).
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The chief acknowledgement is to the participants, the project staff and the China National Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its regional offices for access to death and disease registries. The Chinese National Health Insurance scheme provides electronic linkage to all hospital admission data. Members of the China Kadoorie Biobank collaborative group: International Steering Committee: Junshi Chen, Zhengming Chen (PI), Rory Collins, Liming Li (PI), Richard Peto. International Co-ordinating Centre, Oxford: Daniel Avery, Derrick Bennett, Yumei Chang, Yiping Chen, Zhengming Chen, Robert Clarke, Huaidong Du, Xuejuan Fan, Simon Gilbert, Alex Hacker, Michael Holmes, Andri Iona, Christiana Kartsonaki; Rene Kerosi, Ling Kong, Om Kurmi, Garry Lancaster, Sarah Lewington, John McDonnell, Winnie Mei, Iona Millwood, Qunhua Nie, Jayakrishnan Radhakrishnan, Sajjad Rafiq, Paul Ryder, Sam Sansome, Dan Schmidt, Paul Sherliker, Rajani Sohoni, Iain Turnbull, Robin Walters, Jenny Wang, Lin Wang, Ling Yang, Xiaoming Yang. National Co-ordinating Centre, Beijing: Zheng Bian, Ge Chen, Yu Guo, Bingyang Han, Can Hou, Jun Lv, Pei Pei, Shuzhen Qu, Yunlong Tan, Canqing Yu, Huiyan Zhou. 10 Regional Co-ordinating Centres: Qingdao Qingdao CDC: Zengchang Pang, Ruqin Gao, Shaojie Wang, Yongmei Liu, Ranran Du, Yajing Zang, Liang Cheng, Xiaocao Tian, Hua Zhang. Licang CDC: Silu Lv, Junzheng Wang, Wei Hou. Heilongjiang Provincial CDC: Jiyuan Yin, Ge Jiang, Shumei Liu, Zhigang Pang, Xue Zhou. Nangang CDC: Liqiu Yang, Hui He, Bo Yu, Yanjie Li, Huaiyi Mu, Qinai Xu, Meiling Dou, Jiaojiao Ren. Hainan Provincial CDC: Jianwei Du, Shanqing Wang, Ximin Hu, Hongmei Wang, Jinyan Chen, Yan Fu, Zhenwang Fu, Xiaohuan Wang, Hua Dong. Meilan CDC: Min Weng, Xiangyang Zheng, Yijun Li, Huimei Li, Chenglong Li. Jiangsu Provincial CDC: Ming Wu, Jinyi Zhou, Ran Tao, Jie Yang. Suzhou CDC: Jie Shen, Yihe Hu, Yan Lu, Yan Gao, Liangcai Ma, Renxian Zhou, Aiyu Tang, Shuo Zhang, Jianrong Jin. Guangxi Provincial CDC: Zhenzhu Tang, Naying Chen, Ying Huang. Liuzhou CDC: Mingqiang Li, Jinhuai Meng, Rong Pan, Qilian Jiang, Jingxin Qing, Weiyuan Zhang, Yun Liu, Liuping Wei, Liyuan Zhou, Ningyu Chen, Jun Yang, Hairong Guan. Sichuan Provincial CDC: Xianping Wu, Ningmei Zhang, Xiaofang Chen, Xuefeng Tang. Pengzhou CDC: Guojin Luo, Jianguo Li, Xiaofang Chen, Jian Wang, Jiaqiu Liu, Qiang Sun. Gansu Provincial CDC: Pengfei Ge, Xiaolan Ren, Caixia Dong. Maiji CDC: Hui Zhang, Enke Mao, Xiaoping Wang, Tao Wang. Henan Provincial CDC: Guohua Liu, Baoyu Zhu, Gang Zhou, Shixian Feng, Liang Chang, Lei Fan. Huixian CDC: Yulian Gao, Tianyou He, Li Jiang, Huarong Sun, Pan He, Chen Hu, Qiannan Lv, Xukui Zhang. Zhejiang Provincial CDC: Min Yu, Ruying Hu, Le Fang, Hao Wang. Tongxiang CDC: Yijian Qian, Chunmei Wang, Kaixue Xie, Lingli Chen, Yaxing Pan, Dongxia Pan. Hunan Provincial CDC: Yuelong Huang, Biyun Chen, Donghui Jin, Huilin Liu, Zhongxi Fu, Qiaohua Xu. Liuyang CDC: Xin Xu, Youping Xiong, Weifang Jia, Xianzhi Li, Libo Zhang, Zhe Qiu.
References
- 1. Dahlgren J. Pregnancy and insulin resistance. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders 2006;4:149–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lain KY, Catalano PM. Metabolic changes in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:938–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation 2014;130:1003–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Martin U, Davies C, Hayavi S, Hartland A, Dunne F. Is normal pregnancy atherogenic?. Clin Sci (Lond) 1999;96:421–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, Dickman PW, Mittleman MA, Ludvigsson JF, Ingelsson E. Parity and risk of later-life maternal cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 2010;159:215–221.e216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhang X, Shu XO, Gao YT, Yang G, Li H, Zheng W. Pregnancy, childrearing, and risk of stroke in Chinese women. Stroke 2009;40:2680–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J et al. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. New Engl J Med 1993;328:1528–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dekker JM, Schouten EG. Number of pregnancies and risk of cardiovascular disease. New Engl J Med 1993;329:1893–4; author reply 1894–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Koski-Rahikkala H, Pouta A, Pietilainen K, Hartikainen AL. Does parity affect mortality among parous women? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:968–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Catov JM, Newman AB, Sutton-Tyrrell K et al. Parity and cardiovascular disease risk among older women: how do pregnancy complications mediate the association? Ann Epidemiol 2008;18:873–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Steenland K, Lally C, Thun M. Parity and coronary heart disease among women in the American Cancer Society CPS II population. Epidemiology 1996;7:641–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jacobsen BK, Knutsen SF, Oda K, Fraser GE. Parity and total, ischemic heart disease and stroke mortality: the Adventist Health Study, 1976–1988. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:711–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gallagher LG, Davis LB, Ray RM et al. Reproductive history and mortality from cardiovascular disease among women textile workers in Shanghai, China. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1510–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ness RB, Cobb J, Harris T, D’Agostino RB. Does number of children increase the rate of coronary heart disease in men? Epidemiology 1995;6:442–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lawlor DA, Emberson JR, Ebrahim S et al. Is the association between parity and coronary heart disease due to biological effects of pregnancy or adverse lifestyle risk factors associated with child-rearing? Findings from the British Women’s Heart and Health Study and the British Regional Heart Study. Circulation 2003;107:1260–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jaffe DH, Eisenbach Z, Manor O. The effect of parity on cause-specific mortality among married men and women. Matern Child Health J 2011;15:376–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Eisenberg ML, Park Y, Hollenbeck AR, Lipshultz LI, Schatzkin A, Pletcher MJ. Fatherhood and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3479–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lewington S, Li L, Murugasen S et al. Temporal trends of main reproductive characteristics in ten urban and rural regions of China: the China Kadoorie Biobank Study of 300 000 women. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:1252–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chen Z, Chen J, Collins R et al. China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5 million people: survey methods, baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1652–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Easton DF, Peto J, Babiker AG. Floating absolute risk: an alternative to relative risk in survival and case–control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group. Stat Med 1991;10: 1025–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. World Bank. World Development Indicators. 2016. The World Bank Group. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW. The effect of China’s one-child family policy after 25 years. New Engl J Med 2005;353:1171–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ 2002;325:157–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Williams D. Pregnancy: A stress test for life. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:465–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Alter G, Dribe M, Van Poppel F. Widowhood, family size, and post-reproductive mortality: a comparative analysis of three populations in nineteenth-century Europe. Demography 2007;44: 785–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Grundy E. Women’s fertility and mortality in late mid life: a comparison of three contemporary populations. Am J Human Biol 2009;21:541–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Umberson D, Pudrovska T, Reczek C. Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: a life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family 2010;72:612–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Friedman EM, Mare RD. The schooling of offspring and the survival of parents. Demography 2014;51:1271–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Torssander J. Adult children’s socioeconomic positions and their parents’ mortality: a comparison of education, occupational class, and income. Soc Sci Med 2014;122:148–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nat Med 2008;14: 1197–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



