Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mod Pathol. 2017 Jun 30;30(10):1367–1377. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.55

Mutually exclusive recurrent KRAS and MAP2K1 mutations in Rosai-Dorfman disease

Sofia Garces 1, L Jeffrey Medeiros 1, Keyur P Patel 1, Shaoying Li 1, Sergio Pina-Oviedo 1, Jingyi Li 1, Juan Carlos Garces 2, Joseph D Khoury 1, C Cameron Yin 1
PMCID: PMC5837474  NIHMSID: NIHMS944864  PMID: 28664935

Abstract

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a histiocytic disorder with a poorly-defined pathogenesis. Recent molecular studies have revealed recurrent mutations involving genes in the MAPK/ERK pathway in Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease. However, cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease have rarely been assessed. We performed next-generation sequencing to assess 134 genes on 21 cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease, including 13 women and 8 men with a median age of 43 years (range, 3–82). Thirteen had extranodal, 5 had nodal, and 3 had coexistent nodal and extranodal disease. The head and neck region was the most common area involved (n=7). Mutation analysis detected point mutations in 7 (33%) cases, including KRAS (n=4) and MAP2K1 (n=3). No mutations were identified in ARAF, BRAF, PIK3CA, or any other genes assessed. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated p-ERK overexpression in 3 cases, all harboring MAP2K1 mutations. Patients carrying mutated genes were younger (median age, 10 versus 53 years, p=0.0347) with more pediatric patients (4/7 versus 1/14, p=0.0251). The presence of mutations correlated with location being more common in the head and neck region; 6/7 (86%) mutated versus 1/14 (7%) unmutated cases (p=0.0009). All 5 (100%) mutated cases with available staging information had a multifocal presentation, whereas only 3/11 (27%) unmutated patients had multifocal disease (p=0.0256). Treatment information was available in 10 patients, including radical resection (n=4), resection and radiation (n=3), and cladribine-based chemotherapy (n=3). With a median follow-up of 84 months (range, 7–352), 7 remained in clinical remission and 3 had persistent disease. No correlation between mutation status and clinical outcome was noted. In summary, we detected mutually exclusive KRAS and MAP2K1 mutations in one third of cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease suggesting this subgroup are clonal and involve activation of MAPK/ERK pathway. Our data contributes to the understanding of the biology of Rosai-Dorfman disease and points to potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Rosai-Dorfman disease, histiocytosis, KRAS, MAP2K1, next-generation sequencing

Introduction

Rosai-Dorfman disease, also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, is a rare nodal and/or extranodal histiocytic disorder characterized by the accumulation of abnormal histiocytes undergoing emperipolesis. The latter is defined as the active, non-destructive engulfment of leukocytes including lymphocytes, plasma cells and erythrocytes by histiocytes and is considered the histologic hallmark of Rosai-Dorfman disease (1, 2). Initially described by Destombes (3) and extensively characterized by Rosai and Dorfman (2, 47), Rosai-Dorfman disease has been considered a non-neoplastic entity with unique histopathologic features that usually has a self-limited, albeit protracted, clinical course. Fatalities are uncommon reported to be in the range of 5–10 % (4, 5, 8). Even though Rosai-Dorfman disease has been recognized for almost five decades, its etiology remains largely unknown. It has been hypothesized that Rosai-Dorfman disease may result from underlying host immune dysregulation, likely due to a precipitating event, such as a viral infection. However, published studies have resulted in conflicting data regarding the association of Rosai-Dorfman disease with Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus-6, and parvovirus B19 infection (913). Other authors have highlighted a possible association between Rosai-Dorfman disease and IgG4-related disease as well as various autoimmune disorders (14, 15). Rare familial cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease also occur and are associated with mutations in the nucleoside transporter gene SLC29A1; however, mutations of this gene have not been identified in sporadic cases.

In the last decade, molecular studies on histiocytic disorders have shed light on the pathogenesis of these disorders. Mutually exclusive recurrent somatic mutations involving genes in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathway, including BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 have been identified in about 50-70% of cases of Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease, leading to a better understanding of the biology of these diseases as well as recognition of potential therapeutic targets (1621). More recently, abnormalities in other cellular pathways have been implicated in the pathogenesis of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis cases. Mutations of PI3KCA in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, an alternative downstream effector of RAS signaling, have been shown in a subset of Erdheim-Chester disease cases (2022). Furthermore, ERK activation has been found in a subset of BRAF- and MAP2K1-wild type Langerhans cell histiocytosis and non- Langerhans cell histiocytosis cases (21, 23). These molecular discoveries have played an important role in the stratification of Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease from other histiocytoses in the recently revised classification of histiocytoses (15); conversely a very limited number of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases have been investigated for gene mutations and the results have been controversial. In the largest genomic study to date, 8 cases were analyzed by next-generation sequencing and mutations were detected involving KRAS, NRAS and ARAF in 2 (25%), 1 (12.5%) and 1 (12.5%) case, respectively (21).

In this study we assessed 21 cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease for mutations of a panel of 134 genes that are commonly mutated in hematopoietic neoplasms. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of Rosai-Dorfman disease patients evaluated for recurrent genetic mutations. Our findings add important information regarding the pathogenesis and biology of Rosai-Dorfman disease and point to potentially actionable therapeutic targets.

Materials and Methods

Study group

The study group is composed of 21 cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease. Sixteen cases with available paraffin blocks or unstained slides were culled from the archives of the Department of Hematopathology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2015. In addition, paraffin blocks of 5 additional cases were obtained from the archives of the National Oncologic Institute Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Available clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from the medical records. Routinely prepared hematoxylin-eosin stained slides for all cases were reviewed. The study was conducted under an Institutional Review Board–approved protocol.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical studies were performed in a subset of cases using antibodies specific for CD1a (Leica Biosystem, Newcastle, UK); CD3, CD20, CD68 and CD163 (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA); and S-100 protein (BioGenex, Fremont, CA). Specifically for this study, a highly specific antibody phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) p-ERK (dilution 1:300, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) was used to assess for the presence of nuclear and cytoplasmic phosphorylated p44 and p42 MAPK (Erk1 and Erk2).

Next-generation sequencing

We performed amplicon-based next-generation sequencing targeting the coding regions of a panel of 134 genes that are commonly mutated in hematopoietic neoplasms using the Ion Torrent platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues as described previously (24). For 3 cases, we were able to retrieve tissues that were not involved by Rosai-Dorfman disease to be used as a control. We used 20 ng of DNA to prepare the genomic library. The genes included in the panel are as follows: ABL1, ACVRL1, AKT1, ALK, APC, APEX1, AR, ARAF, ATM, ATP11B, BAP1, BCL2L1, BCL9, BIRC2, BIRC3, BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2, BTK, CBL, CCND1, CCNE1, CD274, CD44, CDH1, CDK4, CDK6, CDKN2A, CHEK2, CSF1R, CSNK2A1, CTNNB1, DCUN1D1, DDR2, DNMT3A, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ERBB4, ESR1, EZH2, FBXW7, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR4, FLT3, FOXL2, GAS6, GATA2, GATA3, GNA11, GNAQ, GNAS, HNF1A, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, IFITM1, IFITM3, IGF1R, IL6, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, KDR, KIT, KNSTRN, KRAS, MAGOH, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MAPK1, MAX, MCL1, MDM2, MDM4, MED12, MET, MLH1, MPL, MSH2, MTOR, MYC, MYCL, MYCN, MYD88, MYO18A, NF1, NF2, NFE2L2, NKX2-1, NKX2-8, NOTCH1, NPM1, NRAS, PAX5, PDCDILG2, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PNP, PPARG, PPP2R1A, PTCH1, PTEN, PTPN11, RAC1, RAF1, RB1, RET, RHEB, RHOA, RPS6KB1, SF3B1, SMAD4, SMARCB1, SMO, SOX2, SPOP, SRC, STAT3, STK11, TERT, TET2, TIAF1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, U2AF1, VHL, WT1, XOP1, and ZNF217. Following successful library generation and purification, DNA was used for multiplex sequencing and analyzed using the Torrent Suite and OncoSeek data pipeline.

Statistical analysis

Correlation between mutation status and clinicopathologic features including age, gender, anatomic site, stage and clinical outcome were assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Age at diagnosis was compared between the two groups using Student t test. All p-values were two-sided and considered statistically significant if less than 0.05.

Results

Clinical features, laboratory findings and outcome

The study group included 21 patients, 13 women and 8 men with a median age of 43 years (range, 3–82). There were 16 adults and 5 pediatric patients (age range, 3–10 years). The clinical and laboratory features at diagnosis are summarized in Table 1. Thirteen patients had only extranodal disease, 5 had nodal disease alone, and 3 had co-existent nodal and extranodal disease. Overall, the head and neck region was the most common region involved (n=7). The most common extranodal site was soft tissue (n=7), followed by nasal cavity (n=4), breast (n=3), orbit (n=2) and lung (n=1). Five patients had osteolytic lesions, including 4 in the nasal septum and 1 involving the ulna; 3 patients with osteolytic lesions in the nasal septum had extension into the base of skull. In one patient the disease was found incidentally in the soft tissue surrounding a mesenteric lymph node dissected for prostate adenocarcinoma staging. None of the 10 patients with available information had a history of autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency or signs or symptoms of other inherited conditions including those associated with Rosai-Dorfman disease, such as H (Faisalabad) syndrome or autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type Ia.

Table 1.

Clinical features, laboratory findings including next generation sequencing results and outcome of patients with Rosai-Dorfman disease

Patient
No.
Agea
(years)
Sex B-
symptoms
LAD HSM Nodal Extranodal Stage WBC
(x109/L)
HGB
(g/dL)
PLT
(K/uL)
LDH
(IU/L)
B2M
(mg/L)
Mutations
detected by
NGS
p-
ERK
IHC
Therapy FU
(m)
Outcome
1 4 F No Yes No Cervical Orbital Multifocal 7.5 12.1 380 591 NA KRAS c.351A>T p.K117N N Multiple including cladribine 141 CR
2 32 F No No No No Soft tissue of trunk Unifocal 6 12.7 257 333 1.6 None N Resection, radiation 142 CR
3 34 F NA NA NA No Soft tissue of trunk NA NA NA NA NA NA KRAS c.64C>A p.Q22K N NA NA NA
4 7 F No Yes No Multi-compartment Paranasal sinuses, lung, bone Multifocal 5.6 11.5 352 403 1.9 MAP2K1, c.371C>G р.P124R
CDH1, с.211C>T p.L71F
P Multiple including radiation & cladribine 352 CR
5 21 F No No No No Breast Unifocal 3.8 11.9 287 388 NA None N Resection 16 PD
6 82 M Yes Yes Yes Inguinal No Unifocal NA NA NA NA NA None NA NA NA NA
7 53 M No No No No Base of skull, orbital Multifocal 7.1 15.8 250 424 NA KRAS 35G>A p.G12D N Resection 7 CR
8 68 M No Yes No No Extranodal soft tissueb Unifocal 18.3 12.5 283 398 NA None N Resection 54 CR
9 53 F NA NA NA No Breast NA NA NA NA NA NA None NA NA NA NA
10 64 M No No No No Bone of upper extremity, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses Multifocal 7.3 13.9 185 443 2.4 None N Multiple including resection, radiation & cladribine 94 PD
11 3 M NA Yes NA Cervical No NA NA NA NA NA NA MAP2K1 c.157T>G p.F53V P NA NA NA
12 64 M No Yes NA Multi-compartment Nasopharynx Multifocal 2.4 11.9 74 372 NA MAP2K1 c.383G>A p.G128D P Resection, radiation, Cladribine 74 PD
13 10 F No Yes No No Base of skull, adenoids, nasopharynx Multifocal 16.3 15.1 272 NA NA KRAS c.436G>A p.A146T N Resection 26 CR
14 35 F No Yes No No Soft tissue of lower extremity Multifocal NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
15 61 F NA NA NA No Soft tissue of trunk NA NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
16 53 F No No No No Breast Unifocal 9 11.6 288 520 2 None N Resection 154 CR
17 43 F NA NA NA No Soft tissue of trunk Unifocal NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
18 36 M NA NA NA No Soft tissue of upper extremity NA NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
19 4 F Yes Yes NA Multi-compartment No Multifocal NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
20 63 F NA Yes NA Cervical No Unifocal NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
21 72 M NA Yes NA Cervical No Unifocal NA NA NA NA NA None N NA NA NA
a

Age indicates age at initial diagnosis

b

Incidental finding in the soft tissue surrounding a mesenteric lymph node removed for staging of prostatic carcinoma

LAD, lymphadenopathy; HSM, hepatosplenomegaly; WBC, white blood cells; HGB, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; B2M, beta-2 microglobulin; NGS, next-generation sequencing; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FU, follow up; m, months; F, female; M, male; NA, not available; P, positive; N, negative; CR, complete remission; PD, persistent disease

Two of 13 (15%) patients presented with B-symptoms; both had exclusively nodal involvement. All patients with nasal lesions had epistaxis at initial presentation and 3 presented with nasal polyps. Two patients with orbital lesions had visual disturbances including proptosis and temporary vision loss. Lymphadenopathy was present in 11 of 16 (69%) patients, whereas hepatosplenomegaly was present in 1 of 11 (9%) patients with available information. Clinical staging data were available for 16 patients; disease was unifocal in 8 and multifocal in 8. Complete blood cell counts were available in 10 patients. Two patients presented with mild leukocytosis and 2 presented with mild leukopenia (median white blood cell count, 7.2 × 103/μl; range, 2.4–18.3 × 103/μl; reference range, 4–11 × 103/μl), 6 patients had mild normocytic anemia (median hemoglobin, 12.3 g/dL; range, 11.5–15.8 g/dL; reference range, 14–18 g/dL for men and 12-16 g/dL for women), and 1 patient had thrombocytopenia (median platelet count, 278 × 103/μl; range, 74–352 × 103/μl; reference range, 140–440 × 103/μl). Serum lactate dehydrogenase was within normal limits in 9 patients (median, 403 IU/L; range, 333–591 IU/L; reference range, 313–618 IU/L) and β2-microglobulin level was slightly elevated in 2 of 4 patients with available data (median, 2 mg/L; range, 1.6–2.4 mg/L; reference range, 0.7–1.8 mg/L).

Clinical follow-up data were available for 10 patients. These patients were treated with different protocols that included surgical excision alone (n=4), surgical excision combined with radiation therapy (n=3), and cladribine-based chemotherapy combined with excision and/or radiation (n=3). With a median follow-up of 84 months (range, 7–352), 7 patients were in clinical remission and 3 patients had persistent disease at last follow-up. All patients remained alive at the end of the study period.

Histologic features

Irrespective of the location, all cases had variable numbers of the characteristic abnormal histiocytes with a round or oval nucleus, a distinct central nucleolus, and abundant clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm that was occasionally vacuolated. In every case there was emperipolesis in a subset of the histiocytes, although emperipolesis was much less obvious in extranodal sites. Involved lymph nodes were enlarged with a variably thickened, fibrotic capsule and nodal architecture was partially distorted by expanded sinuses that contained many characteristic histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and occasional erythrocytes, eosinophils and neutrophils. At extranodal sites the predominant feature was an infiltrate of abnormal histiocytes, in small or large aggregates, associated with a dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate embedded in a fibrotic and/or edematous background. Multinucleated histiocytes were observed in 5 (24%) cases; however, granuloma formation was present focally in only in 1 (5%) case. One (5%) case of showed a minute focus of necrosis. The morphologic features of representative cases are shown in Figures 13.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

KRAS-mutated Rosai-Dorfman disease, soft tissue of trunk (Case 3). (a) Medium power image of soft tissue with aggregates of abnormal emperipoletic histiocytes (200X). (b) Some areas show dense fibrosis where emperipoletic histiocytes are less obvious to identify (400X). (c) Immunostain for S-100 is positive in Rosai-Dorfman histiocytes and negative in engulfed lymphocytes (400X). (d) Immunostain for p-ERK is negative in emperipoletic histiocytes (endothelial cells are positive) (1000X).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MAP2K1-mutated Rosai-Dorfman disease, nasopharynx (case 12). (a) Medium power image of nasopharynx with sheets of histiocytes admixed with lymphocytes and plasma cells (200X). (b) Higher magnification shows numerous histiocytes engulfing lymphocytes, plasma cells and neutrophils (400X). (c) Immunostain for S-100 is positive in histiocytes and negative in engulfed lymphocytes (400X). (d) Immunostain for p-ERK is positive in the nucleus and cytoplasm of a subset of Rosai-Dorman histiocytes (500X).

Targeted next-generation sequencing results

One hundred and thirty-four genes were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Mutations were detected in 7 of 21 (33%) cases, including KRAS (n=4) and MAP2K1 (n=3), and the mutations were point mutations in all 7 cases. Among the KRAS-mutated cases, 2 cases had mutations in exon 2 (c.35G>A p.G12D and c.64C>A p.Q22K), and 2 had mutations in exon 4 (c.351A>T p.K117N and c.436G>A p.A146T). The median allelic frequency of KRAS mutation was 4.69% (range, 3.53–5.64%). Among the MAP2K1-mutated cases, 2 cases had mutations in exon 3 (c.371C>G p.P124R and c.383G>A p.G128D) and 1 had a mutation in exon 2 (c.157T>G p.F53V). The median allelic frequency of MAP2K1 mutation was 4.99% (range, 4.49–7.62%). KRAS and MAP2K1mutations did not co-exist in any cases. An additional novel somatic mutation in CDH1 (c.211C>T p.L71F) with an allelic frequency of 8.75% was identified in a MAP2K1-mutated case (case 4).

The patients harboring mutations were 4 women and 3 men with a median age of 10 (range, 3–64); 4 (57%) patients were children. Three (43%) had exclusively extranodal disease, 3 (43%) had concomitant nodal and extranodal disease and 1 (14%) had only nodal disease. Six of 7 (86%) cases with mutations were from the head and neck region, specifically nasal cavity (n=3), orbit (n=2), cervical lymph node (n=1), and soft tissue of trunk (n=1). All 5 patients with mutations with available staging information had a multifocal disease presentation. Of 5 patients with available follow-up information, with a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 7–352), 4 (80%) showed clinical remission and 1 (20%) had persistent disease. Among the group that experienced clinical remission, 2 underwent surgical excision alone and 2 received multiple therapeutic regimens including cladribine-based therapy.

No mutations in 134 genes assessed were detected in 14 (67%) patients, which included 9 women and 5 men. The median age was 53 (range, 4–82) and included only 1 (7%) pediatric patient. Unmutated lesions were exclusively extranodal in 10 patients and exclusively nodal in 4 patients. The locations of the extranodal lesions included soft tissue of the trunk and extremity or surrounding a lymph node (n=6), breast (n=3), nasal cavity (n=1), and the lymph node regions involved were cervical (n=2), inguinal (n=1) and multicompartmental (n=1). In 1 (7%) patient the lesion was located in the head and neck region. For 11 patients with available staging data, 8 (73%) had unifocal and 3 (27%) had multifocal disease. Of the 5 patients with available clinical information, with a median follow-up of 94 months (range, 16–154), 3 (60%) were in clinical remission after surgical resection with (n=1) or without (n=2) radiation therapy, and 2 (40%) had persistent disease in spite of surgical resection (n=1) or cladribine-based therapy (n=1).

Statistical analysis showed that patients with mutated genes were younger than those without mutations (median age, 10 versus 53 years, p=0.0347) with more pediatric patients in the mutated group (4/7 versus 1/14, p=0.0251). Mutated cases also more commonly involved the head and neck region than unmutated cases (6/7 versus 1/14, p=0.0009). All 5 (100%) patients in the mutated group with available staging information had multifocal disease, whereas only 3/11 (27%) patients in the unmutated group had multifocal disease (p=0.0256) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathologic features of patients with or without KRAS and MAP2K1 mutations

Total KRAS or MAP2K1-mutated Unmutated p value
Number 21 7 (33%) 14 (67%)
Age (years)a 43 (3-82) 10 (3-64) 53 (4-82) 0.0347
 #pediatric patients 5 (24%) 4 (57%) 1 (7%) 0.0251
Gender 1.0000
 Male 8 (38%) 3 (43%) 5 (36%)
 Female 13 (62%) 4 (57%) 9 (64%)
Location, n (%)
 Head & Neck 7 (33%) 6 (86%) 1 (7%) 0.0009
 Nodal 5 (24%) 1 (14%) 4 (29%) 0.6244
 Extranodal 13 (62%) 3 (43%) 10 (71%) 0.3972
 Both 3 (14%) 3 (43%) 0 (0%) 0.0263
Stage, n (%) 0.0256
 Unifocal 8 (50%) 0 (0%) 8 (73%)
 Multifocal 8 (50%) 5 (100%) 3 (27%)
 Data not available 5 2 3
Follow-up (months)a 84 (7/352) 74 (7-352) 94 (16-154)
Outcome, n (%) 1.0000
 Clinical remission 7 (70%) 4 (80%) 3 (60%)
 Persistent disease 3 (30%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%)
 Data not available 11 2 9
a

Number expressed as median (range)

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical studies showed that the histiocytes were strongly positive for S-100 protein in all cases, which facilitated the identification of emperipolesis. The histiocytes were positive for CD68 (n=6) and CD163 (n=5), and were negative for CD1a (n=19), CD3 (n=9) and CD20 (n=9) in all cases assessed.

Immunohistochemical analysis using p-ERK antibody in 19 cases demonstrated high levels of expression in the nuclear and cytoplasm of the histiocytes in 3 cases (cases 4, 11 and 12); all harboring MAP2K1 mutations. Conversely, none of the 4 patients with KRAS mutations (cases 1, 3, 7 and 13) or in whom no mutations were detected (n=12), showed expression of p-ERK. In all cases, stromal cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells were positive for p-ERK (internal controls).

Discussion

The MAPK/ERK signaling pathway is a key regulatory pathway involved in many essential cellular processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and survival through a wide variety of nuclear, cytoplasmic and cell membrane targets (25). In a simplified unidirectional model, activation of the G-protein RAS triggers sequential changes in the phosphorylation status of the downstream kinases RAF and MEK, and the serine/threonine kinases ERK-1 and 2 (26). Phosphorylated and activated ERK translocates to the nucleus where it regulates the activity of several transcription factors, which in turn induce expression of genes required for survival and proliferation (26, 27). It is now well-established that mutations that constitutively activate members of this pathway occur in several non-hematologic malignancies, including melanoma, gliomas and carcinomas of the thyroid gland, lung, colon, ovary and hepatobiliary system (2830), as well as hematologic diseases, namely hairy cell leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease (15, 3134). In the last decade, the discovery of BRAF V600E mutation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Erdheim-Chester disease, followed by MAP2K1 mutations in BRAF-wild type Langerhans cell histiocytosis, significantly unraveled the underlying biology of these disorders. As the best example, the identification of BRAF V00E in subsets of circulating CD11c+ dendritic cells, CD14+ monocytes and in bone marrow CD34+ hematopoietic cell progenitors in patients with high-risk Langerhans cell histiocytosis support the pathogenic model in which Langerhans cell histiocytosis is a myeloid-related neoplasm (35). Recently, Diamond et al. interrogated 37 patients with BRAF V600E-wild type, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis histiocytoses by whole exome sequencing and/or RNA sequencing and demonstrated recurrent activating mutations in MAP2K1 (32%), NRAS (16%), KRAS (11%), PIK3CA (8%), and ARAF (3%) in all types of non- Langerhans cell histiocytosis histiocytoses (21), including 8 patients with Rosai-Dorfman disease where 50% harbored mutually exclusive mutations involving KRAS, NRAS or ARAF (21). Another recent single case report identified a KRAS K117N point mutation in a case of Rosai-Dorfman disease (36). In light of these breakthroughs, we hypothesized that activating mutations in the RAS/RAF/MAPK/ERK or related signaling pathways may play a key role in the pathogenesis of Rosai-Dorfman disease.

To answer this question, and further recognize the incidence of mutations in Rosai-Dorfman disease, we interrogated 21 cases of Rosai-Dorfman disease using next-generation sequencing for mutations in a panel of 134 genes. We identified mutually exclusive KRAS and MAP2K1 point mutations in one-third of the cases. In addition, a novel somatic mutation in the cadherin 1 (CDH11 L71F) gene was identified in one MAP2K1-mutated case; although the biologic and clinical significance of this finding is unclear. The remaining 67% of cases demonstrated wild-type status at all gene loci examined including ARAF, BRAF, ERBB1, ERBB2, ERBB3, KRAS, MAP2K1, NRAS, PIK3CA and PTEN. None of our cases had a BRAF mutation, confirming data from several prior studies that showed universal BRAF-wild type status in Rosai-Dorfman disease (16, 17, 37, 38). Of note, no mutations were identified in ARAF, NRAS, PIK3CA, or PTEN, unlike the results reported previously by Diamond et.al and another group (21, 39). Our panel did not include SLC29A3 or FAS genes (15); however, as previously mentioned none of the patients in our study cohort showed clinical characteristics of the inherited disorders associated with mutations in those genes. Whereas our sample size is the largest published to date, it is still limited which precludes us from drawing any statistical significant conclusion on the effect of mutation status on clinical outcome. However, this small study group shows that patients harboring KRAS or MAP2K1 mutation have a lower median age with a higher occurrence in children, a higher frequency of involvement of the head and neck region, and a higher rate of multifocal disease. No correlation between mutation status and clinical outcome was noted. A larger patient series is needed to confirm these preliminary associations.

We additionally showed p-ERK overexpression by immunohistochemistry in all MAP2K1-mutated cases supporting MAPK/ERK pathway activation, in keeping with activating mutations of this pathway. Interestingly, none of the patients with KRAS mutations or patients in whom no mutation was detected showed expression of p-ERK. We speculate that mutations of upstream signaling protein genes in the MAPK/ERK pathway, such as KRAS, may not cause downstream cascade activation to the same extent as MAP2K1 alterations. The other possibility is that ERK activation is not a universal end-point in Rosai-Dorfman disease and that a proportion of cases utilize alternative pathways downstream of RAS or outside the MAPK/ERK pathway axis. Other authors have evaluated p-ERK expression by immunohistochemistry in non-Rosai-Dorfman disease histiocytoses. For instance, in a study that included 97 patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis, Zeng et al. demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the presence of BRAF or MAP2K1 mutations and p-ERK overexpression; interestingly in their cohort, expression of p-ERK was also observed in 40% of BRAF/MAP2K1-wild-type cases (40). Others observed that phosphorylation of downstream pathway mediators, such as ERK, can occur independently from mutations in BRAF or MAP2K1 in Langerhans cell histiocytosis or BRAF and NRAS in Erdheim-Chester disease (16, 19, 24). These findings suggested the existence of other mechanisms of perturbation of this kinase cascade. This idea was supported by a more recent study focused on Erdheim-Chester disease by Emile et al. In addition to BRAF V600E mutation present in more than half of the patients, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations were present in 10% and 3.7% of cases, respectively. Interestingly, BRAF V600E and NRAS mutations, both being members of the MAPK/ERK pathway, appeared to be mutually exclusive; while PIK3CA mutation co-existed with BRAF mutation in 4 of 7 cases, supporting involvement of both the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways in a subset of Erdheim-Chester disease patients (20). In another recent study using whole-exome sequencing, targeted BRAF sequencing, and/or whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA seq), alternative genetic mechanisms of ERK activation were identified in a subset of BRAF V600E-unmutated Langerhans cell histiocytosis, namely in-frame BRAF deletions in the β3-αC loop and a FAM73A-BRAF fusion (23). Similarly, in non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis histiocytoses, MAPK-pathway-activating RNF11-BRAF, CLIP2-BRAF, KIF5B-ALK and LMNA-NTRK1 fusions were identified, the last two abnormalities leading to activation of related pathways, namely ALK, STAT3 and PI3K-AKT (21). Whereas our next-generation sequencing technology can detect insertions/deletions in addition to point mutations of the 134 genes included in the panel, we cannot detect gene fusions, and we cannot rule out mutations in other genes outside our panel. Nevertheless, we propose that Rosai-Dorfman disease is a clonal histiocytic disorder driven by genetic alterations, at least in mutated cases, similar to Langerhans cell histiocytosis and other non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis histiocytoses.

Clinically, Rosai-Dorfman disease is in general a self-limited disorder that allows conservative management (41). However, a small subset of patients experience refractory disease, locally aggressive lesions or dissemination, denoting unfavorable prognosis (4, 4246). In complicated cases, radical resection, radiotherapy or methotrexate combined with other chemotherapeutic agents including 6-mercaptopurine or cladribine have been used, with different response rates. Standardized therapy for Rosai-Dorfman disease is yet to be established (41, 4648). Others have shown promising results using the RAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, as targeted therapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated histiocytoses (4951), which has been followed by advances in additional targeted agents for patients with refractory histiocytoses. For example, in a study by Diamond et.al two patients with refractory Erdheim-Chester disease who harbored MAP2K1 mutations showed a clinical response to MEK inhibition with single-agent trametinib and cobimetinib, respectively [20]. Similarly, a third patient with refractory Erdheim-Chester disease harboring mutated ARAF showed rapid regression of the lesion after therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib [20]. It seems likely that patients with non-self-limited histiocytoses with specific genetic abnormalities could potentially benefit from targeted therapy; however, more studies are required to sustain this idea.

In summary, the presence of mutually exclusive recurrent somatic KRAS and MAP2K1 mutations in 33% of archived Rosai-Dorfman disease specimens in this study further supports the idea that at least a subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases is clonal, expanding the list of histiocytic and non-histiocytic disorders harboring MAPK/ERK pathway mutations. We also provide evidence that MAP2K1 mutations induce constitutive activation of downstream ERK shown by positive p-ERK immunohistochemical staining. Finally, these results highlight the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis in Rosai-Dorfman disease, at least in patients with refractory or aggressive disease who may benefit from targeted therapy.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MAP2K1-mutated Rosai-Dorfman disease, nodal (case 11). (a) Low power image of a lymph node with markedly expanded sinuses by numerous emperipoletic histiocytes, lymphocytes and plasma cells (100X). (b) High power magnification of a distended sinus with a histiocyte engulfing numerous lymphocytes (1000X). (c) Immunostain for S-100 highlights Rosai-Dorfman histiocytes and provides contrast with numerous negatively outlined lymphocytes (1000X). (d) Immunostain for p-ERK is positive in histiocytes in a nuclear and cytoplasmic pattern (1000X).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jawad Manekia and Mohammad Mohammad for technical assistance in the next-generation sequencing study.

Footnotes

Disclosure/Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Humble JG, Jayne WH, Pulvertaft RJ. Biological interaction between lymphocytes and other cells. British journal of haematology. Br J Haematol. 1956 Jul;2(3):283–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1956.tb06700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. A newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969 Jan;87(1):63–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Destombes P. Adenitis with lipid excess, in children or young adults, seen in the Antilles and in Mali. (4 cases) Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1965 Nov-Dec;58(6):1169–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990 Feb;7(1):19–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. An analysis of 14 deaths occurring in a patient registry. Cancer. 1984 Nov 1;54(9):1834–40. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841101)54:9<1834::aid-cncr2820540911>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF, Eyman JM. Immunologic abnormalities and their significance in sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Nov;82(5):515–25. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/82.5.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: a pseudolymphomatous benign disorder. Analysis of 34 cases. Cancer. 1972 Nov;30(5):1174–88. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197211)30:5<1174::aid-cncr2820300507>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lauwers GY, Perez-Atayde A, Dorfman RF, et al. The digestive system manifestations of Rosai-Dorfman disease (sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy): review of 11 cases. Hum Pathol. 2000 Mar;31(3):380–5. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(00)80254-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levine PH, Jahan N, Murari P, et al. Detection of human herpesvirus 6 in tissues involved by sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) J Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;166(2):291–5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.2.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luppi M, Barozzi P, Garber R, et al. Expression of human herpesvirus-6 antigens in benign and malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Am J Pathol. 1998 Sep;153(3):815–23. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65623-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mehraein Y, Wagner M, Remberger K, et al. Parvovirus B19 detected in Rosai-Dorfman disease in nodal and extranodal manifestations. J Clin Pathol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1320–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.029850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sarwal R, Tu E, Mendelblatt FI, et al. Atypical ocular presentations of Rosai-Dorfman disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):9–15. doi: 10.1080/09273940801923911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsang WY, Yip TT, Chan JK. The Rosai-Dorfman disease histiocytes are not infected by Epstein-Barr virus. Histopathology. 1994 Jul;25(1):88–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb00604.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Menon MP, Evbuomwan MO, Rosai J, et al. A subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases show increased IgG4-positive plasma cells: another red herring or a true association with IgG4-related disease? Histopathology. 2014 Feb;64(3):455–9. doi: 10.1111/his.12274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Emile JF, Abla O, Fraitag S, et al. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016 Jun 2;127(22):2672–81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Badalian-Very G, Vergilio JA, Degar BA, et al. Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2010 Sep 16;116(11):1919–23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-279083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haroche J, Charlotte F, Arnaud L, et al. High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Blood. 2012 Sep 27;120(13):2700–3. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-430140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roden AC, Hu X, Kip S, et al. BRAF V600E expression in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: clinical and immunohistochemical study on 25 pulmonary and 54 extrapulmonary cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Apr;38(4):548–51. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sahm F, Capper D, Preusser M, et al. BRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cells of variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):e28–34. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-429597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Emile JF, Diamond EL, Helias-Rodzewicz Z, et al. Recurrent RAS and PIK3CA mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease. Blood. 2014 Nov 6;124(19):3016–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diamond EL, Durham BH, Haroche J, et al. Diverse and Targetable Kinase Alterations Drive Histiocytic Neoplasms. Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb;6(2):154–65. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heritier S, Saffroy R, Radosevic-Robin N, et al. Common cancer-associated PIK3CA activating mutations rarely occur in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2015 Apr 9;125(15):2448–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-625491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chakraborty R, Burke TM, Hampton OA, et al. Alternative genetic mechanisms of BRAF activation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2016 Nov 24;128(21):2533–2537. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pina-Oviedo S, Medeiros LJ, Li S, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis associated with lymphoma: an incidental finding that is not associated with BRAF or MAP2K1 mutations. Mod Pathol. 2017 Jan 13; doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.235. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kolch W. Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Nov;6(11):827–37. doi: 10.1038/nrm1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Montagut C, Settleman J. Targeting the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway in cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2009 Oct 8;283(2):125–34. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Robinson MJ, Cobb MH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Apr;9(2):180–6. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Greaves WO, Verma S, Patel KP, et al. Frequency and spectrum of BRAF mutations in a retrospective, single-institution study of 1112 cases of melanoma. J Mol Diagn. 2013 Mar;15(2):220–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rahman MA, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, et al. B-Raf mutation: a key player in molecular biology of cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013 Dec;95(3):336–42. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang J, Wu G, Miller CP, Tatevossian RG, Dalton JD, Tang B, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies genetic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):602–12. doi: 10.1038/ng.2611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Falini B, Martelli MP, Tiacci E. BRAF V600E mutation in hairy cell leukemia: from bench to bedside. Blood. 2016 Oct 13;128(15):1918–1927. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-418434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Waterfall JJ, Arons E, Walker RL, et al. High prevalence of MAP2K1 mutations in variant and IGHV4-34-expressing hairy-cell leukemias. Nat Genet. 2014 Jan;46(1):8–10. doi: 10.1038/ng.2828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang L, Singh RR, Patel KP, et al. BRAF kinase domain mutations are present in a subset of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with wild-type RAS. Am J Hematol. 2014 May;89(5):499–504. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang J, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. Endogenous oncogenic Nras mutation promotes aberrant GM-CSF signaling in granulocytic/monocytic precursors in a murine model of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2010 Dec 23;116(26):5991–6002. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Berres ML, Lim KP, Peters T, et al. BRAF-V600E expression in precursor versus differentiated dendritic cells defines clinically distinct LCH risk groups. J Exp Med. 2014 Apr 7;211(4):669–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shanmugam V, Margolskee E, Kluk M, et al. Rosai-Dorfman Disease Harboring an Activating KRAS K117N Missense Mutation. Head Neck Pathol. 2016 Sep;10(3):394–9. doi: 10.1007/s12105-016-0709-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Go H, Jeon YK, Huh J, et al. Frequent detection of BRAF(V600E) mutations in histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. Histopathology. 2014 Aug;65(2):261–72. doi: 10.1111/his.12416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chakraborty R, Hampton OA, Shen X, et al. Mutually exclusive recurrent somatic mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF support a central role for ERK activation in LCH pathogenesis. Blood. 2014 Nov 6;124(19):3007–15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-577825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gatalica Z, Bilalovic N, Palazzo JP, et al. Disseminated histiocytoses biomarkers beyond BRAFV600E: frequent expression of PD-L1. Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 14;6(23):19819–25. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zeng K, Ohshima K, Liu Y, Zhang W, Wang L, Fan L, et al. BRAFV600E and MAP2K1 mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis occur predominantly in children. Hematol Oncol. 2016 Sep 6; doi: 10.1002/hon.2344. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dalia S, Sagatys E, Sokol L, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease: tumor biology, clinical features, pathology, and treatment. Cancer Control. 2014 Oct;21(4):322–7. doi: 10.1177/107327481402100408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Andriko JA, Morrison A, Colegial CH, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease isolated to the central nervous system: a report of 11 cases. Mod Pathol. 2001 Mar;14(3):172–8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Demicco EG, Rosenberg AE, Bjornsson J, et al. Primary Rosai-Dorfman disease of bone: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Sep;34(9):1324–33. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ea50b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sandoval-Sus JD, Sandoval-Leon AC, Chapman JR, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the central nervous system: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014 May;93(3):165–75. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O’Gallagher K, Dancy L, Sinha A, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease and the heart. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016 Feb;5(1):1–5. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2015.01047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aouba A, Terrier B, Vasiliu V, et al. Dramatic clinical efficacy of cladribine in Rosai-Dorfman disease and evolution of the cytokine profile: towards a new therapeutic approach. Haematologica. 2006 Dec;91(12 Suppl):ECR52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Simko SJ, Tran HD, Jones J, et al. Clofarabine salvage therapy in refractory multifocal histiocytic disorders, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis, juvenile xanthogranuloma and Rosai-Dorfman disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Mar;61(3):479–87. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Maia RC, de Meis E, Romano S, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease: a report of eight cases in a tertiary care center and a review of the literature. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Jan;48(1):6–12. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20144110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Emile JF, et al. Dramatic efficacy of vemurafenib in both multisystemic and refractory Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. Blood. 2013 Feb 28;121(9):1495–500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-446286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Emile JF, et al. Reproducible and sustained efficacy of targeted therapy with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated Erdheim-Chester disease. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):411–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V, et al. Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):726–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES