Abstract
2,3,5-tris(Glutathion-S-yl)hydroquinone, a potent nephrotoxic and nephrocarcinogenic metabolite of benzene and hydroquinone, generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) causing DNA strand breaks and the subsequent activation of DNA repair enzymes, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1. Under robust oxidative DNA damage, PARP-1 is hyperactivated, resulting in the depletion of NAD+ and ATP with accompanying elevations in intracellular calcium concentrations (iCa2+), and ultimately necrotic cell death. The role of Ca2+ during PARP-dependent necrotic cell death remains unclear. We therefore sought to determine the relationship between Ca2+ and PARP-1 during ROS-induced necrotic cell death in human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2). Our experiments suggest that store-operated Ca2+ channel (SOC) entry contributes to the coupling of PARP-1 activation to increases in iCa2+ during ROS-induced cell death. Poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase (PARG), which catalyzes the degradation of PARs to yield free ADP-ribose (ADPR), is known to activate Ca2+ channels such as TRPM2. However, siRNA knockdown of PARG did not restore cell viability, indicating that free ADPR is not responsible for SOC activation in HK-2 cells. The data indicate that PARP-1 and iCa2+ are coupled through activation of SOC mediated Ca2+ entry in an apparently ADPR-independent fashion; alternative PAR-mediated signaling likely contributes to PARP-dependent necrotic cell death, perhaps via PAR-mediated signaling proteins that regulate iCa2+ homeostasis.
Keywords: 2,3,5-tris(glutathione-S-yl)hydroquinone; HK-2 cells; store-operated calcium channel entry; poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1; poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase; PARylation
2,3,5-tris(Glutathion-S-yl)hydroquinone (TGHQ), a potent nephrotoxic and nephrocarcinogenic metabolite of benzene and hydroquinone (HQ), generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) causing DNA strand breaks and the subsequent activation of DNA repair enzymes, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1. PARP-1 is an abundant nuclear protein that contributes to the regulation of chromatin structure, gene expression, DNA metabolism, and DNA repair (Krishnakumar and Kraus, 2010). PARP-1 is activated 500-fold above basal levels by ROS induced DNA strand breaks (Virag et al., 2013). Upon activation by DNA strand breaks and utilizing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) as a substrate (D’Amours et al., 1999; Luo and Kraus, 2012), PARP-1 catalyzes the covalent attachment of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymers onto acceptor proteins, including proteins that participate in DNA repair, transcription factors, PARP-1 itself, and histones. Whilst PARP-1 has a primary function to regulate and repair DNA, excessive DNA strand breaks lead to PARP-1 overactivation, which subsequently results in depletion of both NAD+ and ATP, and ultimately cell death (Pieper et al., 1999).
Although the precise molecular events that occur downstream of PARP-1 hyperactivation during PARP-1-mediated cell death remain elusive, substantial NAD+ depletion can result in the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and both caspase-dependent and independent cell death (Kim et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2012). Moreover, traumas such as ischemia-reperfusion, myocardial infarction, and ROS-induced injury are all known to hyperactivate PARP-1 in scenarios where inhibition of PARP-1 prevents cell death and long-term tissue damage (Jagtap and Szabo, 2005; Kim et al., 2005).
Ca2+-dependent modulation of PARP-1 during cellular stress leads to changes in cell metabolism, and attenuation of ROS-induced cell death (Bentle et al., 2006). Similar to the effects of PARP-1 inhibition, chelation of intracellular Ca2+ with BAPTA-AM protects against cell stress (Bentle et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2014). In particular, Ca2+ chelation also attenuates PARP-1 hyperactivation and γ-H2AX formation during ROS-induced cell death. Moreover, inhibition of PARP-1 reduced TGHQ-induced changes in iCa2+ (Zhang et al., 2014). Thus, iCa2+ appears to be coupled to PARP-1 hyperactivation during ROS-induced cell death. However, mechanisms by which PARP-1 and Ca2+ are coupled in a manner that exacerbates cellular stress remain unclear. PARylation, the manner in which PAR polymers bind to proteins, regulates several cellular processes, including DNA repair, chromatin architecture, cell cycle progression, transcription, mitochondrial function, and cell death (Virag et al., 2013). Covalently PARylated proteins can be hydrolyzed to free poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), or mono(adenosine diphosphate ribose) (ADPR), by poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase (PARG) (Luo and Kraus, 2012). Because of the rapid breakdown of PAR, it can act as a signal transducer, either as a PARG-derived ADPR monomer, or as a free polymer via binding to proteins containing PAR-binding motifs, PAR-binding zinc finger domains, and macrodomains (Gagne et al., 2001; Kraus, 2008). PAR signaling has been implicated in many different forms of cell death, including parthanatos (Andrabi et al., 2006), autophagy (Munoz-Gamez et al., 2009; Rodriguez-Vargas et al., 2012), and regulated necrosis or necroptosis (Virag et al., 1998).
TGHQ, a potent ROS-generating nephrotoxic metabolite of HQ (Lau et al., 2001), causes non-apoptotic cell death in human renal proximal tubule epithelial (HK-2) cells (Zhang et al., 2014). Moreover, TGHQ-induced cell death in HK-2 cells required hyperactivation of PARP-1 coupled to increases in iCa2+, but is independent of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) translocation from the mitochondria to the nucleus (Zhang et al., 2014). The current studies further explored the relationship between PARP-1 and iCa2+, including investigations on the role of PARG in ROS-induced cell death and its relationship to the coupling of PARP-1 signaling and iCa2+. Our data reveal that store-operated calcium channels (SOCs) play a role in ROS-mediated cell death and that Ca2+ entry through SOCs is coupled to PARP-1 activity. Intriguingly, in contrast to previous reports linking Ca2+ to PARP-1 via the breakdown of PAR, our data reveal cell death is independent of PARG activity, suggesting a novel pathway for the coupling of PARP-1 and Ca2+ leading to cell death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals, reagents, and TGHQ purification
TGHQ was synthesized and purified as previously described (Lau et al., 1988). TGHQ is nephrotoxic and carcinogenic and must therefore be handled with protective clothing in a ventilated hood. Adenosine 5′-diphosphate (Hydroxymethyl)pyrrolidinediol (ADP-HPD), a cell impermeable PARG inhibitor, was purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, Massachusetts). H2DCFDA and Fluo-4-AM were obtained from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, California). Antibody for poly(ADP-ribose) was a product of Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, New York). All other reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri).
Cell culture
Human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia). Cells were cultured in keratinocyte serum-free medium (K-SFM, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California) supplemented with 0.05 mg/ml bovine pituitary extract and 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor provided by the media supplier. Cell cultures were performed at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were grown to ∼80% confluence prior to treatment.
Cell death viability assays-MTS
To determine the viability of HK-2 cells in the presence and absence of various toxicants and inhibitors, cells were seeded at 8× 103 cells/well and allowed to grow to ∼80% confluence. Cells were washed once with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), without sodium pyruvate, supplemented with 25-mM HEPES, then treated with TGHQ with or without inhibitors. Cell viability was determined with an assay measuring mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, in which [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium], inner salt (MTS), a tetrazolium compound, is reduced to a formazan product by dehydrogenase enzymes found in metabolically active cells. After treatment with TGHQ, cells were washed twice with DMEM/HEPES without phenol red, MTS (20 μl) was subsequently added to 100 μl of DMEM/HEPES and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance of the formazan was measured directly from 96-well plates at 490 nm using a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, California).
Measurement of ROS generation
HK-2 cells were seeded in clear bottom black 96-well plates at 8×103 cells/well and grown to ∼80% confluence. Cells were washed once with DMEM/HEPES without phenol red, then incubated with 10 μM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFA) for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with DMEM/HEPES without phenol red, and incubated at 37°C for another 30 min in the presence and absence of various inhibitors. Cells were then treated with TGHQ (400 μM) and immediately placed in a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, California). A kinetic assay was performed at 495 nm excitation and 525 nm emission for 1 h, where cells were imaged every 10 min.
Western blot analysis
HK-2 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 2.0×105 cells/well and grown to ∼80% confluence. After treatment with TGHQ, cells were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed with PAR lysis buffer containing 50-mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 150-mM NaCl, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1-mM EGTA, 1-mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 20% glycerol, a complete protease inhibitor tablet, and 1-μM Adenosine 5′-diphosphate (Hydroxymethyl)pyrrolidinediol (ADP-HPD). Cells were rotated for 15 min at 4°C then centrifuged to remove cell debris. Protein concentrations were determined with detergent-compatible reagent (Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, California), then lysate was incubated with 4× sample buffer (Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, California) containing 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and heated for 15 min at 65°C on a heating block. Samples were resolved in 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween 20 (TBS-T), then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Following washes, membranes were incubated with secondary antibody coupled with horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoblots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence reaction (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Rockwell, Illinois) and imaged on a ChemiDoc XRS System (BioRad, Hercules, California).
Determination of total NAD content
Cells were seeded on 6-well plates at 2.0×105 cells/well for 48 h and grown to ∼80% confluence. Cells were pretreated with 2-APB, a non-selective SOC channel inhibitor, and then co-treated with TGHQ (400 μM) at indicated treatment times. Total NAD+ was extracted using 1.0-M HClO4 and neutralized to pH 7.0 by adding 2-M KOH/0.66-M KH2PO4. NAD+ concentrations were determined by enzymatic cycling assays as previously described (Jacobson and Jacobson, 1997) using a SpectraMax M3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, California).
Live cell calcium imaging
HK-2 cells were seeded on 35-mm ibiTreat tissue culture dishes (Ibidi, Verona, Wisconsin) at 2.0×105 cells/dish and cultured for 48 h to ∼80% confluence. Cells were rinsed once with DMEM without phenol red containing 25-mM HEPES, then loaded with 5 μM Fluo-4 AM for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were washed 3 times with Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, and subsequently incubated with DMEM/HEPES without phenol red for an additional 30 min at room temperature in the presence and absence of inhibitors. Cells were treated with TGHQ for 2 h at 37°C and immediately imaged at ×40 magnification on a DeltaVision RT deconvolution microscopy system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania) with an inverted Olympus IX 70 microscope controlled by imaging program DeltaVision softWoRx. Data were analyzed using the NIH provided software ImageJ.
siRNA knockdown of PARG
Cells were seeded in 24-well or 96-well plates and allowed to grow to ∼25% confluence prior to transfection. Knockdown of PARG was performed using the transfection reagent DharmaFECT along with ON-TARGETplus siRNA SMART pool purchased from Dharmacon (Lafayette, Colorado). Cells were transfected using 25-nM non-targeting siRNA or PARG siRNA and incubated for 72 h, changing culture media daily. Confirmation of knockdown was determined by Western blot analysis.
Immunofluorescence analysis
HK-2 cells were seeded in 35-mm ibiTreat tissue culture dishes at 2.0×105 cells/dish and grown to ∼80% confluence. Cells were treated with TGHQ (400 µM) for 30 min then rinsed twice with ice cold PBS. Cells were permeabilized and fixed using a 1:1 mixture of acetone and methanol for 20 min at −20°C. Immediately after fixation, cells were rinsed twice with PBS and blocked using 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS containing 1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were incubated with anti-PAR antibody in 1% BSA overnight at 4°C, then washed 3 times with PBS-T the following day. Cells were finally incubated with donkey anti-mouse IgG Alexa 488 (Life Technologies) antibody in 1% BSA for 2 h at room temperature in the dark, then washed with PBS and incubated with DAPI at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were imaged at ×40 magnification using an oil immersion lens on a DeltaVision RT deconvolution microscopy system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania) with an inverted Olympus IX 70 microscope controlled by imaging program DeltaVision SoftWoRx. Data were analyzed using the NIH provided software ImageJ.
Statistical analyses
Statistical differences between the treated and control groups were determined by Student’s unpaired t test. Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA using Graphpad Prism 6 for Mac. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Depletion of Intracellular Calcium Stores Does Not Protect Against ROS-Induced Cell Death
TGHQ-generated ROS-induced cell death can be attenuated when increases in iCa2+ are impaired by chelation with BAPTA-AM (Zhang et al., 2014). We therefore sought to determine the source(s) of Ca2+ contributing to increases in iCa2+ to further elucidate the relationship between Ca2+ and ROS-induced necrotic cell death. TGHQ decreased cell viability as evidenced by decreases in mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity (Figure 1). In addition, depletion of ER Ca2+ stores was accomplished using a sarcoplasmic-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) pump inhibitor, thapsigargin. Thapsigargin binds to the SERCA pump, depleting ER stores within 5 min of treatment, and prevents reentry of Ca2+ to replenish stores through the SERCA pump (Figure 1A). Pre-treatment and co-treatment with various concentrations of thapsigargin in the presence of TGHQ (Figure 1B) did not restore mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, eliminating ER Ca2+ stores as a source of increased cytosolic Ca2+ during TGHQ-induced cell death.
SOCs Contribute to Increases in Intracellular Calcium
To assess whether extracellular Ca2+ was the source of elevations in cytoplasmic Ca2+, store-operated Ca2+ channels (SOCs) were inhibited using a common inhibitor, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) (DeHaven et al., 2008). Pre-treatment and co-treatment of cells with 2-APB in the presence of TGHQ restored mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity in a time- (Figure 2B) and dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A), suggesting that SOCs play a role in TGHQ-induced cell death. Live cell Ca2+ imaging of cells pre-treated and co-treated with 2-APB and treated with TGHQ (400 μM) revealed a decrease in iCa2+ concentrations over 2 h (Figs. 2C and 2D), further confirming that SOCs contribute to TGHQ initiated increases in iCa2+.
SOC Entry Is Coupled to PARP-1 Activation During TGHQ-Induced Necrotic Cell Death
To elucidate the relationship between SOCs with PARP-1, and their respective role in cell death, we examined the effects of SOC inhibition on PARP-1 activity. PARP-1 activation has been coupled to cell death through the consumption of NAD+, a cofactor necessary for the PARylation of proteins. Total NAD+ levels were depleted by >50% within 2 h of treatment with TGHQ (Figs. 3A and 3B). Moreover, pre-treatment and co-treatment of cells with 2-APB restored NAD+ levels in both a time- (Figure 3B) and dose-dependent manner (Figure 3A), indicating an interaction between SOCs and PARP-1. Western blot analysis of PAR confirmed that pre-treatment and co-treatment with 2-APB attenuated ribosylation initiated by PARP-1 in the presence of TGHQ (Figs. 3C and 3D), confirming the coupling of SOCs and PARP.
SOC Activation Occurs Downstream of ROS Generation
ROS were measured using H2DCFDA to verify 2-APB did not inhibit TGHQ-induced cell death upstream of SOC inhibition. TGHQ induced a 2-fold increase in ROS within 1 h, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was able to completely abrogate ROS in the presence of the toxicant (Figure 4). In addition, pretreatment with 2-APB failed to prevent ROS production, confirming that the inhibitory effects of 2-APB on SOCs occur independent of any effects on ROS production.
To further assess whether Ca2+ entry through SOCs is coupled to PARP-1-mediated cell death, we determined whether inhibitors of SOCs and PARP could create synergistic or additive cytoprotection in the presence of TGHQ. While each individual inhibitor produced partial protection from TGHQ toxicity, pre-treatment and co-treatment with low concentrations of both 2-APB (75 μM) and DPQ (20 μM), a PARP-1 inhibitor, demonstrated no additive or synergistic cytoprotection (Figure 5), consistent with the view that SOCs and PARP-1 are coupled, rather than independently engaged during TGHQ-induced cell death.
Coupling of PARP-1 and Calcium Is Independent of PAR Breakdown by PARG
While PARP-1 ribosylates DNA repair proteins to assist in their recruitment to the site of injury, PARG essentially disassembles these polymers, with the concomitant generation of ADPR, a signaling molecule capable of activating Ca2+ channels, such as the TRPM2 cation channel (Naziroglu, 2007). Interestingly however, complete knockdown of PARG (Figure 6C) had no cytoprotection of TGHQ-induced cell death (Figs. 6A and 6B), suggesting that ADPR is not responsible for inducing elevations in iCa2+. However, Western blot analysis confirmed that PARG knockdown increased protein PARylation in the absence of TGHQ (Figs. 6D and 6E), indicating PARG is essential for the breakdown of PAR.
Cystosolic PAR Polymers Post-TGHQ Treatment
Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that shortly after treatment of cells with TGHQ, PAR polymers were, as anticipated, predominantly located in the nucleus (Figure 7). Intriguingly, at later time points, PARylation was evident in the cytosol, and by 45 min was evenly distributed throughout the cell. Indeed, 60–75 min post-treatment, PARylation was located mainly in the cytosol. The presence of PAR polymers in the cytosol is supportive of a potential role in signaling to ligand-gated Ca2+ channels to facilitate Ca2+ entry.
DISCUSSION
Human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2) exposed to a ROS generating agent (TGHQ) experience an increase in iCa2+ concentrations in a PARP-1-dependent manner (Zhang et al., 2014). Thus, PARP-1 hyperactivation and reciprocal elevations in iCa2+ are coupled during ROS-induced cell death (Zhang et al., 2014). In this study, we demonstrate that ROS-dependent increases in iCa2+ appear to be primarily due to the activation of SOCs (Figure 2). Consistent with this view, inhibition of SOCs prevents increases in iCa2+ and restores ROS-mediated depletions in NAD+ and increases in PARylation caused by the hyperactivation of PARP-1 (Figure 3). Interestingly, previous reports have found that ROS generation can activate SOC entry (Ehring et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2000; Madesh et al., 2005; Nunes and Demaurex, 2014). The two components of SOCs, STIM (STIM1,2), and Orai (Orai 1,2,3) CRAC channels, can be activated through increases in ROS (Bogeski et al., 2010; Gandhirajan et al., 2013; Hawkins et al., 2010). Moreover, cytosolic Ca2+ increases are required for PARP-1 activation, and can contribute to PARP-1 hyperactivation (Homburg et al., 2000; Kun et al., 2004; Virag et al., 1999). Thus, TGHQ-induced ROS generation may contribute to SOC activation and lead to further PARP-1 activation.
Conversely, TGHQ-mediated PARP-1 hyperactivation causes an increase in protein PARylation (Figure 3C). PARylation plays a diverse role in many cellular and molecular processes (Kim et al., 2005). Recent proteome-wide identification of PARylated proteins revealed PARylation of Ca2+-related proteins, including the SERCA pump (Gagne et al., 2008; Pic et al., 2011). Therefore, we speculate that SOCs may also be activated through increased PARylation of Ca2+-related proteins that leads to increases in iCa2+ and subsequently, exacerbates PARP-1 hyperactivation. SOCs are ubiquitously expressed channels comprised of 2 major components, STIM1/2 and Orai1,2,3 (Lewis, 2011). Orai proteins, also known as CRAC channels, are located on the plasma membrane, while STIM1/2 are located on the ER (Prakriya and Lewis, 2015). When intracellular ER Ca2+ stores are depleted, STIM1/2 translocate to the plasma membrane to open CRAC channels, thus allowing for Ca2+ entry (Lewis, 2011; Prakriya and Lewis, 2015). Since SOCs are expressed in HK-2 cells and primary human proximal tubular cells (Garcia-Vaz et al., 2014; Mai et al., 2016), it may be possible that PARylation of the SERCA pump, located on the ER, can indirectly induce SOC activation, and thus iCa2+ entry to the ER and cytosol that leads to cell death.
Breakdown of PAR to ADPR is catalyzed by PARG (Davidovic et al., 2001) and the coupling of PARP-1 and Ca2+ through PARG breakdown of PAR to ADPR is well established; indeed, the import of extracellular Ca2+ through the melastatin-like transient receptor potential 2 channels (TRPM2), a cation permeable channel activated by ADPR, contributes to store-operated Ca2+ entry. Activation of TRPM2 accounts for the Ca2+ influx into the cytosol, and ultimately to cell death in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and macrophages (Blenn et al., 2011; Zou et al., 2013). Moreover, PARG silencing in these cells can protect against ROS-induced cell death (Blenn et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2013), implying that the disassembly of PAR polymers is necessary for downstream signaling coupled to PARP-mediated cell death. Indeed, PAR is viewed as playing an active role in cell death in complex ways that seem to be cell- or tissue-specific (Luo and Kraus, 2012). For example, PAR polymers are directly toxic to neurons during N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced cell death, and PARG mediated PAR breakdown can protect against cell death (Andrabi et al., 2006). We demonstrated the ability of PAR to translocate from the nucleus to the cytosol of HK-2 cells (Figure 7), and the export of PAR from the nucleus triggers the release of the AIF from mitochondria, ultimately mediating a caspase-independent cell death (parthantos) (Virag et al., 2013). Conversely, in HL-60 cells, human promyelocytic leukemia cells, PAR proteins are detected following TGHQ treatment, and AIF is released from mitochondria and migrates to the nucleus (Zhang et al., 2012). However, TGHQ-induced apoptosis of HL-60 cells is caspase dependent (Zhang et al., 2012). Clearly, the mechanisms by which nuclear protein PARylation couples to downstream cytosolic signaling and ultimately cell death is complex and context dependent.
PARG silencing did not restore mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity (Figs. 6A–C). PARG, nevertheless, is clearly active in HK-2 cells and can break down PAR polymers in both the presence and absence of TGHQ, as PARylation increased during PARG silencing (Figs. 6D and 6E). Thus, our data indicate a novel PARG-independent cell death pathway that may require PARylation of proteins rather than the breakdown of PARylation to ADPR. These data are consistent with previous findings in HK-2 cells where ROS-induced cell death was independent of mitochondrial AIF release (Zhang et al., 2014), a PAR-dependent process.
Our previous report on HK-2 cells demonstrated ROS increases occurred as early as 5–10 min, PAR polymer formation was seen between 15 and 30 min, and iCa2+ increases occurred after 35 min. Consistent with these results, this study demonstrated PAR formation in the nucleus at 15 min post-TGHQ application (Figure 7), suggesting PARP-1 activation due to ROS increases. Moreover, PAR polymer migration to the cytosol occurs between 30 and 45 min (Figure 7), consistent with subsequent increases in iCa2+ observed between 35 and 45 min. Thus, in our current model, we speculate that TGHQ produces robust ROS increases and DNA damage, which lead to activation of PARP-1 and PAR polymer formation, and subsequent increases in iCa2+ through SOCs activation that lead to non-apoptotic cell death (Figure 8).
In summary, in the HK-2 cell model of ROS-induced non-apoptotic cell death, SOCs are coupled to PARP-1 hyperactivation (Figure 3) and the subsequent excessive protein PARylation appears to activate a PARG-independent pathway to cell death that may facilitate extracellular Ca2+ entry through SOCs. Protein PARylation per se could represent a cell death signal, activating downstream signaling pathways that contribute to increases in iCa2+, further exacerbating cell death. Our studies reveal a novel PARP-1-dependent, PARG-independent cell death pathway. The PARG-independent nature of cell death is consistent with findings that indicate a PARP-dependent, AIF-independent pathway to cell death (Zhang et al., 2014). We speculate that PARylation of cytosolic proteins causes downstream signaling, activating store-operated Ca2+ entry, ultimately increasing iCa2+ concentrations, and leading to PARP-1-dependent cell death. To further elucidate the role of PARylated proteins in cell death, current studies are focused on the identification of PAR-modified proteins following TGHQ exposure.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Dr David Elliot for assistance with, and use of, the deconvolution microscope for the calcium imaging studies, and Dr Doug Cromey, from the Cell Imaging Core of the South West Environmental Health Sciences Center, for his assistance with immunofluorescence and data analysis.
FUNDING
This study was supported in part by an award to SSL from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES006694), and to F.Z. from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21507093); Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2015020737); Fund for long-term training of young teachers in Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (ZCJJ2014402); and the General project of Education Department of Liaoning Province (L2015529).
REFERENCES
- Andrabi S. A., Kim N. S., Yu S. W., Wang H., Koh D. W., Sasaki M., Klaus J. A., Otsuka T., Zhang Z., Koehler R. C., et al. (2006). Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer is a death signal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 18308–18313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bentle M. S., Reinicke K. E., Bey E. A., Spitz D. R., Boothman D. A. (2006). Calcium-dependent modulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 alters cellular metabolism and DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 33684–33696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blenn C., Althaus F. R., Malanga M. (2006). Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase silencing protects against H2O2-induced cell death. Biochem. J. 396, 419–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blenn C., Wyrsch P., Bader J., Bollhalder M., Althaus F. R. (2011). Poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase is an upstream regulator of Ca2+ fluxes in oxidative cell death. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 68, 1455–1466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bogeski I., Kummerow C., Al-Ansary D., Schwarz E. C., Koehler R., Kozai D., Takahashi N., Peinelt C., Griesemer D., Bozem M., et al. (2010). Differential redox regulation of ORAI ion channels: a mechanism to tune cellular calcium signaling. Sci. Signal. 3, ra24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D’Amours D., Desnoyers S., D’Silva I., Poirier G. G. (1999). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions. Biochem. J. 342, 249–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidovic L., Vodenicharov M., Affar E. B., Poirier G. G. (2001). Importance of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase in the control of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism. Exp. Cell Res. 268, 7–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeHaven W. I., Smyth J. T., Boyles R. R., Bird G. S., Putney J. W. Jr. (2008). Complex actions of 2-aminoethyldiphenyl borate on store-operated calcium entry. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 19265–19273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehring G. R., Kerschbaum H. H., Fanger C. M., Eder C., Rauer H., Cahalan M. D. (2000). Vanadate induces calcium signaling, Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel activation, and gene expression in T lymphocytes and RBL-2H3 mast cells via thiol oxidation. J. Immunol. 164, 679–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagne J. P., Isabelle M., Lo K. S., Bourassa S., Hendzel M. J., Dawson V. L., Dawson T. M., Poirier G. G. (2008). Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribose) binding proteins and poly(ADP-ribose)-associated protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 6959–6976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagne J. P., Shah R. G., Poirier G. G. (2001). Analysis of ADP-ribose polymer sizes in intact cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 224, 183–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gandhirajan R. K., Meng S., Chandramoorthy H. C., Mallilankaraman K., Mancarella S., Gao H., Razmpour R., Yang X. F., Houser S. R., Chen J., et al. (2013). Blockade of NOX2 and STIM1 signaling limits lipopolysaccharide-induced vascular inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 887–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Vaz E., Chen G., Bhandari S., Daskoulidou N., Zeng B., Jiang H., Gomez M. F., Atkin S. L., Xu S. (2014). ORAI store-operated calcium channels are associated with proximal renal tubule dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy. FASEB J 28 689.13. [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins B. J., Irrinki K. M., Mallilankaraman K., Lien Y. C., Wang Y., Bhanumathy C. D., Subbiah R., Ritchie M. F., Soboloff J., Baba Y., et al. (2010). S-glutathionylation activates STIM1 and alters mitochondrial homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 190, 391–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homburg S., Visochek L., Moran N., Dantzer F., Priel E., Asculai E., Schwartz D., Rotter V., Dekel N., Cohen-Armon M. (2000). A fast signal-induced activation of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. A novel downstream target of Phospholipase c. J. Cell Biol. 150, 293–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Q., Zheng G., Zweier J. L., Deshpande S., Irani K., Ziegelstein R. C. (2000). NADPH oxidase activation increases the sensitivity of intracellular Ca2+ stores to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in human endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15749–15757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson E. L., Jacobson M. K. (1997). Tissue NAD as a biochemical measure of niacin status in humans. Methods Enzymol. 280, 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jagtap P., Szabo C. (2005). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the therapeutic effects of its inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 421–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M. Y., Zhang T., Kraus W. L. (2005). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by PARP-1: ‘PAR-laying’ NAD+ into a nuclear signal. Genes Dev. 19, 1951–1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraus W. L. (2008). Transcriptional control by PARP-1: chromatin modulation, enhancer-binding, coregulation, and insulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 294–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnakumar R., Kraus W. L. (2010). The PARP side of the nucleus: molecular actions, physiological outcomes, and clinical targets. Mol. Cell 39, 8–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kun E., Kirsten E., Mendeleyev J., Ordahl C. P. (2004). Regulation of the enzymatic catalysis of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by dsDNA, polyamines, Mg2+, Ca2+, histones H1 and H3, and ATP. Biochemistry 43, 210–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lau S. S., McMenamin M. G., Monks T. J. (1988). Differential uptake of isomeric 2-bromohydroquinone-glutathione conjugates into kidney slices. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 152, 223–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lau S. S., Monks T. J., Everitt J. I., Kleymenova E., Walker C. L. (2001). Carcinogenicity of a nephrotoxic metabolite of the “nongenotoxic” carcinogen hydroquinone. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 25–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis R. S. (2011). Store-operated calcium channels: new perspectives on mechanism and function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, 3970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo X., Kraus W. L. (2012). On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-1. Genes Dev. 26, 417–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madesh M., Hawkins B. J., Milovanova T., Bhanumathy C. D., Joseph S. K., Ramachandrarao S. P., Sharma K., Kurosaki T., Fisher A. B. (2005). Selective role for superoxide in InsP3 receptor-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and endothelial apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 170, 1079–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mai X., Shang J., Liang S., Yu B., Yuan J., Lin Y., Luo R., Zhang F., Liu Y., Lv X., et al. (2016). Blockade of Orai1 store-operated calcium entry protects against renal fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 3063–3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munoz-Gamez J. A., Rodriguez-Vargas J. M., Quiles-Perez R., Aguilar-Quesada R., Martin-Oliva D., de Murcia G., Menissier de Murcia J., Almendros A., Ruiz de Almodovar M., Oliver F. J. (2009). PARP-1 is involved in autophagy induced by DNA damage. Autophagy 5, 61–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naziroglu M. (2007). New molecular mechanisms on the activation of TRPM2 channels by oxidative stress and ADP-ribose. Neurochem. Res. 32, 1990–2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nunes P., Demaurex N. (2014). Redox regulation of store-operated Ca2+ entry. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21, 915–932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pic E., Gagne J. P., Poirier G. G. (2011). Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Expert Rev. Proteomics 8, 759–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pieper A. A., Verma A., Zhang J., Snyder S. H. (1999). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, nitric oxide and cell death. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 20, 171–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prakriya M., Lewis R. S. (2015). Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol. Rev. 95, 1383–1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Vargas J. M., Ruiz-Magana M. J., Ruiz-Ruiz C., Majuelos-Melguizo J., Peralta-Leal A., Rodriguez M. I., Munoz-Gamez J. A., de Almodovar M. R., Siles E., Rivas A. L., et al. (2012). ROS-induced DNA damage and PARP-1 are required for optimal induction of starvation-induced autophagy. Cell Res. 22, 1181–1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virag L., Robaszkiewicz A., Rodriguez-Vargas J. M., Oliver F. J. (2013). Poly(ADP-ribose) signaling in cell death. Mol. Aspects Med. 34, 1153–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virag L., Salzman A. L., Szabo C. (1998). Poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase activation mediates mitochondrial injury during oxidant-induced cell death. J. Immunol. 161, 3753–3759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virag L., Scott G. S., Antal-Szalmas P., O’Connor M., Ohshima H., Szabo C. (1999). Requirement of intracellular calcium mobilization for peroxynitrite-induced poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase activation and cytotoxicity. Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 824–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F., Lau S. S., Monks T. J. (2012). A dual role for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 during caspase-dependent apoptosis. Toxicol. Sci. 128, 103–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F., Xie R., Munoz F. M., Lau S. S., Monks T. J. (2014). PARP-1 hyperactivation and reciprocal elevations in intracellular Ca2+ during ROS-induced nonapoptotic cell death. Toxicol. Sci. 140, 118–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou J., Ainscough J. F., Yang W., Sedo A., Yu S. P., Mei Z. Z., Sivaprasadarao A., Beech D. J., Jiang L. H. (2013). A differential role of macrophage TRPM2 channels in Ca(2)(+) signaling and cell death in early responses to H(2)O(2). Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 305, C61–C69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]