Skip to main content
Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench logoLink to Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench
. 2017 Winter;10(Suppl1):S122–S128.

Development of experimental fibrotic liver diseases animal model by Carbon Tetracholoride

Atoosa Gitiara 1, Samaneh Tokhanbigli 1, Sogol Mazhari 1, Kaveh Baghaei 2, Behzad Hatami 2, Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi 3, Ali Asadi Rad 3, Afshin Moradi 2, Meyam Nasiri 4, Nakisa Zarrabi Ahrabi 5, Mohammad Reza Zali 2
PMCID: PMC5838191  PMID: 29511482

Abstract

Aim:

This study is presenting an effective method of inducing liver fibrosis by CCL4 as a toxin in two different breeds of rat models.

Background:

Liver fibrosis is a result of inflammation and liver injury caused by wound healing responses which ultimately lead to liver failure. Consequently, after liver fibrosis, the progression will be continued to liver cirrhosis and at the end stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Many studies have demonstrated that one of the most important causes of liver fibrosis is Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Fibrotic Liver is affected by an excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins like collagen and α-SMA.

Methods:

In two different experiments, male Vistar, and Sprague Dawley Rat models ranging from 200±60, corresponding to an age of approximately 10 weeks were utilized in order to induce CCL4 treated liver fibrosis.

Results:

After 6 weeks of CCL4 injection, different tests have been carried out to verify the liver fibrosis including serum markers such as Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), molecular tests containing, laminin and α-SMA and also pathological observation by Hematoxylin and eosin staining in both fibrosis and control group.

Conclusion:

The results of Pathology and Real-time PCR showed that fibrosis was induced much more effectively in Sprague Dawley rat model compared with Wistar rats.

Key Words: Liver Fibrosis, CCL4, Animal Model

Introduction

One of the substantial characteristics of the liver is self-repairing in response to injury by employing a large number of factors through different repair mechanisms. Studies have been demonstrated that the main known causes of liver failure are HCV and HBV infections, induced acute injury, alcohol abuse, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is a distinctive feature of type 2 diabetes and obesity which is a hard and intricate shape of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), also is related to metabolic syndromes (1,2). Regarding this, NAFLD is the pre-stage in liver fibrosis gradually develop to NASH by oxidative stress leading to activation of Kupffer cells. Kupffer cells are resident macrophages in hepatic cells that are one of the participants in liver fibrosis by releasing Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) (1,3,4).

Another contributing factor in liver fibrosis is wound healing response to inflammation (5, 6). Liver fibrosis is defined by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins which implicates in many related liver diseases. Over synthesis of these proteins lead to degradation of ECM structure which example of these proteins are collagen type IV, procollagen type I and III, alpha smooth muscle Actin (α-SMA), and laminin. Furthermore, up-regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) is expected, and they both play an indispensable role in an imbalance of ECM synthesis (7, 8). Precipitation of ECM proteins distorts the normal hepatic structure by forming a severe scar and further development of regenerative nodules lead to cirrhosis. Subsequently, after activation of Kupffer cells by liver injury, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) change from quiescent to the active form and differentiate into myofibroblasts-like cells by releasing fibrogenic factors. These factors trigger the fibrotic process that includes initiation, progression, regression (9, 10) and initiation of synthesizing a large amount of ECM (2). Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are placed in the perisinusoidal space and are the main cells involved in liver diseases such as liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, thereby, they contribute in the formation of severe scars via response to liver damage. Hepatic Stellate Cells express the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and desmin as neural markers and after activation they lose the capacity of storing lipid droplets and obtain a myofibroblastic phenotype which is the characteristic of upregulation of a-smooth muscle actin (11-13).

One of the major cytokines in profibrogenic process is transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), which plays a pivotal role in up-regulation of α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and type I collagen synthesis (14). TGF-β is considered as a key player in progression of steatosis to cirrhosis and can ultimately lead to hepatocellular carcinoma. It has been hypothesized that inhibition of TGF-β could attenuate liver fibrosis. Another example of cytokines involved in progression of liver fibrosis includes Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) which contributes to proliferation of ECM. Studies have been showed that liver fibrosis could be a reversible process, therefore, inhibition of PDGF’s function could have a therapeutic benefit against liver fibrosis. Taken together, the necessity of investigating and clarify the exact mechanism of liver fibrosis and therapeutic approaches, it is undeniable and vitally important to have reliable animal models. In this study, we aim to establish and present an efficient protocol to induce liver fibrosis by CCL4 as a toxin reagent in rat models (15).

Methods

Experimental design

Animals

7 male Wistar (Experiment one) and 3 Male Sprague Dawley (SD) (experiment two) rats weighing 200±60 grams, corresponding to an age of approximately 10 weeks were purchased from Iran university of medical sciences, acclimatized for 1 weeks in defined standard living condition, placed in 12 hours light/dark cycle, constant temperature (20 ± 20C) and fed with pellet food and water. Animals were weighed before each dosing at appropriate times, and observed daily for signs of ill health. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Experiment one

Rats were divided into 4 groups accepting different doses of CCL4 (Cat No: 32.022-6, Sigma, UK) dissolved in equal volume of olive oil (1:1) through intraperitoneal (IP) injection (twice a week) for 6 weeks. 3 different doses were assigned for each group (0.5, 1, 1.5 mL/kg). one group was considered as control and received the same volume of olive oil.

Experiment two

Rats were divided into two groups. The Group one (CCL4 group, n=2) received CCL4 dissolved in equal volume (1:1) of olive oil through intraperitoneal (IP) injection, subcutaneously at a dose of 1ml/kg twice weekly, for 6 weeks. The group two (n=1), received injection of olive oil vehicle only, as a negative control twice a week. At the end of the 6-week experimental period, all the rats were fasted overnight and then sacrificed. Blood was collected from the animals and the serum used for further analysis. Specimen were cut out from the liver. Half of each specimen washed with PBS to remove blood and stored at −70°C for quantitative Real Time PCR analysis. The other half was fixed in a 10% formalin solution for histopathological study.

Determination of serum biochemical parameters

On one hand, to verify the liver fibrosis formation, blood samples were collected into tube containing EDTA and serum separation was carried out by centrifuging at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 40C. Activity of Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were determined by Elisa assay using commercially available kits according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Histopathological examination

On the other hand, parts of liver tissues were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin, and finally, cut into 4 µm-thick sections for histomorphological analysis. These sections were aimed for Masson’s trichrome staining to visualize collagen deposition and ECM degradation. The grades of liver fibrosis according to Ishak biopsy score have been shown in Table1.

Table 1.

Fibrosis score

F0 F1 F2 F3 F4
No Fibrosis Portal areas without septa Portal areas with few septa Numerous septa without cirrhosis cirrhosis
Control
CCL-4 treated group

qRT-PCR assay for direct markers

The Liver tissue also was used for measuring gene alteration related to fibrosis in contrast with control group such as procollagens I and III, collagen IV, α-SMA and laminin which were assessed by qRT-PCR.

RNA of control and fibrotic livers were extracted by YTA Total RNA Purification Mini Kit (FavorGen, Taiwan) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted total RNA was used in the next step for cDNA synthesis (RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, cat no K1622, Thermo Scientific) using random hexamers in the presence of RNase inhibitor. Synthesized cDNA was applied to Real-time quantitative PCR assays. Real-Time were performed in duplicate on Rotor Gene Q Series Real-Time PCR system thermal cycler and SYBR Green Mastermix (Applied Biosystems).

Primers used to evaluate pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were designed by primer3, NCBI. The sequences of all the primer pairs have been shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Primer sequences of fibrosis related genes

Gene Primer Sequences
Procollagen I F: 5’TCAAGATGGTGGCCGTTACT3’
R: 5’TGTTCTCAATCTGCTGGCTCA3’
Procollagen III F: 5’GTGCAATATGTCCACAGCCT3’
R: 5’TCGCCATTTCTCCCAGG3’
Collagen IV F: 5’GTTTCCAGGTGTAAAAGGAG3’
R: 5’CTTAAGTGTGCCAGGTTTTC3’
α-SMA F: 5’AATGGGCCAAAAGGACAGCT3’
R: 5’TCTTTTCCATGTCGTCCCAGT3’
Laminin F: 5’CTGCAGGAGGACAAGAAATG3’
R: 5’AGGAGCAAACGTTGTGACCA3’

Statistical analysis

Collected data were analyzed and the changes in mRNA expression were compared with control group with relative expression levels of targeted mRNA over the reference values. REST 2009 software version 2.0.13, and Prism 5 (One-way ANOVA analysis) were used to calculate the relative expression levels.

Results

24 hours after the last CCL4 injection (day 42) all rats were sacrificed. The blood sample was collected for measuring serum markers. Meantime, liver tissue discharged for evaluation of fibrosis-related genes and pathological observations.

Experiment one

Throughout the 6-week period of CCl4 administration, at dose levels from (0.5, 1, 1.5 mL/kg), there were no clinical signs of CCl4 toxicity. Different tests had been carried out to verify the hepatic fibrosis but did not approach any exact consequences which demonstrate the failure establishment of liver fibrosis in rats proved by histopathological observation. However, animals in the CCl4-treated groups did not gain as much weight as the control (vehicle-treated) rats.

Experiment two

Pathological observation

Throughout the 6-week period of CCl4 administration, at dose level of (1 mL/kg), the signs of CCL4 toxicity were observed and proved by histopathological observation. Fibrotic models were in the stages 3 which are defined by enlargement of stellate cells in portal tracts with numerous septa formation meaning extensive ECM degradation. In addition, the pseudolobular formation revealed the successful induction and establishment of fibrosis in CCL4-models; therefore, liver function was compromised to save retinoid.

The rat in the control group was in stage 2 and had a normal lobular architecture with central veins. However, a large number of lipids induced by olive oil were detected in control group instead of having normal lobular and structure. (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Liver histopathological observation; liver fibrosis-induced by CCL4 in rats; A: HE staining of the normal rat received olive oil, a large number of lipids with rare septa formation can be observed; B: HE staining of fibrosis models received CCL4, defined enlargement of stellate cells in portal tracts with numerous septa formation

Serum biochemical analysis (ALT, AST ratio)

Fibrosis accumulation is a dynamic process resulting from liver injury. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), are hepatic enzymes that are released into the bloodstream from damaged hepatocyte and upraised in the blood before the clinical signs and symptoms of liver diseases occurrence. The prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio has been accredited in non-alcoholic liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis. Hence, the ratio of AST and ALT tends to elevate with stages of fibrosis. (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Serum biochemical parameters (ALT/ AST) analysis. Elevation of ALT and AST as a fibrotic sign in CCL4_treated group was observed

qRT-PCR

Liver fibrosis has many verifying test which quantitative Real Time PCR is one of them. As shown in Fig 2 the expression of Laminin and Collagen IV in CCL4 treated group were significantly increased compared to the control group. The other markers, such as α-SMA and procollagen IV relatively were elevated which demonstrated the ECM degradation in progression of liver fibrosis. (Figure 3). The comparative quantitative Real time-PCR for ECM degradation markers such as α-SMA and Laminin, after treatment with CCL4 compared to the control group. CCL4- treated group showed substantial elevation in both expression of Laminin and α-SMA. (P<0.0001, ANOVA).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The comparative quantitative Real time-PCR for ECM degradation markers such as α-SMA and Laminin, after treatment with CCL4 compared to the control group. CCL4- treated group showed substantial elevation in both expression of Laminin and α-SMA.(P<0.0001, ANOVA

Discussion

Liver fibrosis is a dynamic process in human body representation of liver response to injury and inflammation. However, liver is known for its capability of self-renewing in serious conditions, but the process of repairing and replacing damaged cells leave a large amount of scar tissue in the liver. Fibrosis develops under constant injury and repairing which leaves severe scars in liver tissues (6). Liver fibrosis mainly is characterized by accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as collagen that is the common occurrence and feature in most liver diseases (16).Therefore, over time the structure and architecture of liver and consequently the blood flow become disrupted and eventually lead to liver Cirrhosis and ultimately hepatocyte carcinoma cell (HCC) (17). Although the etiology of liver fibrosis and cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the process are not fully elucidated, many outstanding approaches have been made in this context. Due to the importance of liver fibrosis and indispensability of this organ in human, experimental tools namely animal models in variety of human diseases are considered. Recently, substantial advances have been made in creation of reliable animal models in autoimmune diseases such as diabetes (18) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) as gastrointestinal disease (19). However, Hepatic fibrosis models have been described in vast majority of studies by using different methods associated with toxic reagents typically CCL4 (20, 21), immunological damage (22-24), biliary fibrosis (25, 26), and alcoholic liver disease (27-29) mostly in rats and mice. Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis induced by carbon tetrachloride have advantages over the other methods that have made it the common and widely utilized method in animal models especially rats and mice. Liver fibrosis induced by CCL4 reflects a good characterization of fibrosis and the same pattern of disease observed in human caused by injury, inflammation, and all these evidence elicit the valuable models with CCL4 (30). Besides considered disadvantages CCL4 have, there is no direct human disease counterpart. In addition, the CCl4 model is the best characterized with respect to histological, biochemical, cell, and molecular changes associated with the development of fibrosis. Hence, the requirement for a CCL4 induced liver fibrosis is inevitable to investigate such a complicated disease to save many lives in the world and in this study we presented an efficient protocol to have fibrotic liver rat models in Sprague Dawley strains.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases grants (RIGLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran). We are especially indebted to Iran university of Medical Sciences.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Takaki A, Kawai D, Yamamoto K. Molecular mechanisms and new treatment strategies for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:7352–79. doi: 10.3390/ijms15057352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:209–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI24282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parvaiz F, Manzoor S, Tariq H, Javed F, Fatima K, Qadri I. Hepatitis C virus infection: molecular pathways to insulin resistance. Virol J. 2011;8:474. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taghipour N, Molaei M, Mosaffa N, Rostami-Nejad M, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Anissian A, et al. An experimental model of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium from acute progresses to chronicity in C57BL/6: correlation between conditions of mice and the environment. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016;9:45–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee UE, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pellicoro A, Ramachandran P, Iredale JP, Fallowfield JA. Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:181–94. doi: 10.1038/nri3623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hemmann S, Graf J, Roderfeld M, Roeb E. Expression of MMPs and TIMPs in liver fibrosis - a systematic review with special emphasis on anti-fibrotic strategies. J Hepatol. 2007;46:955–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moosavi A, Haghighi A, Mojarad EN, Zayeri F, Alebouyeh M, Khazan H, et al. Genetic variability of Blastocystis sp isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Iran. Parasitol Res. 2012;111:2311–15. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang CY, Yuan WG, He P, Lei JH, Wang CX. Liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells: Etiology, pathological hallmarks and therapeutic targets. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:10512–22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.S Josan, K Billingsley, J Orduna, J Mo, R Luong, L Yu, et al. “Assessing inflammatory liver injury in an acute CCl 4 model using dynamic 3D metabolic imaging of hyperpolarized [ 1- 13 C ] pyruvate”. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1671–7. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Puche JE, Saiman Y, Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. Compr Physiol. 2013;3:1473–92. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taghipour N, Aghdaei HA, Haghighi A, Mossafa N, Tabaei SJ, Rostami-Nejad M. Potential treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a review of helminths therapy. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2014;7:9–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lepreux S, Desmoulière A. Human liver myofibroblasts during development and diseases with a focus on portal (myo)fibroblasts. Front Physiol. 2015;6:173. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hellerbrand C, Stefanovic B, Giordano F, Burchardt ER, Brenner DA. The role of TGFbeta1 in initiating hepatic stellate cell activation in vivo. J Hepatol. 1999;30:77–87. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80010-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muhanna N, Doron S, Wald O, Horani A, Eid A, Pappo O, et al. Activation of hepatic stellate cells after phagocytosis of lymphocytes: A novel pathway of fibrogenesis. Hepatology. 2008;48:963–77. doi: 10.1002/hep.22413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Olsen AL, Bloomer SA, Chan EP, Gaça MD, Georges PC, Sackey B, et al. Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301:110–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00412.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dechêne A, Sowa JP, Gieseler RK, Jochum C, Bechmann LP, El Fouly A, et al. Acute liver failure is associated with elevated liver stiffness and hepatic stellate cell activation. Hepatology. 2010;52:1008–16. doi: 10.1002/hep.23754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ranjzad F, Mahban A, Shemirani AI, Mahmoudi T, Vahedi M, Nikzamir A, et al. Influence of gene variants related to calcium homeostasis on biochemical parameters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:225–32. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9506-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rostami Nejad M, Taghipour N, Nochi Z, Mojarad EN, Mohebbi SR, Harandi MF, et al. Molecular identification of animal isolates of Echinococcus granulosus from Iran using four mitochondrial genes. J Helminthol. 2012;86:485–92. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1100071X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.V C Alcoholism, I Portal, N Mouse, R Knockout, A L T Bilirubin, H Biopsy, H Non-invasive, G S Genetic, H C C Human. “Experimental liver fibrosis research : update on animal models , legal issues and translational aspects Experimental liver fibrosis research : update on animal models , legal issues and translational aspects,” . 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liang J, Zhang B, Shen RW, Liu JB, Gao MH, Li Y, et al. Preventive effect of halofuginone on concanavalin A-induced liver fibrosis. PLoS One. 2013;8:82232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Holdener M, Hintermann E, Bayer M, Rhode A, Rodrigo E, Hintereder G, et al. Breaking tolerance to the natural human liver autoantigen cytochrome P450 2D6 by virus infection. J Exp Med. 2008;205:1409–22. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yüksel M, Laukens D, Heindryckx F, Van Vlierberghe H, Geerts A, Wong FS, et al. Hepatitis mouse models: from acute-to-chronic autoimmune hepatitis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2014;95:309–20. doi: 10.1111/iep.12090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zierden M, Kühnen E, Odenthal M, Dienes HP. Effects and regulation of autoreactive CD8+ T cells in a transgenic mouse model of autoimmune hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:975–86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.S Procedures. “MORPHOLOGIC AND FUNCTIONAL CHANGES IN THE LIVERS OF,” no. group II. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Georgiev P, Jochum W, Heinrich S, Jang JH, Nocito A, Dahm F, et al. Characterization of time-related changes after experimental bile duct ligation. Br J Surg. 2008;95:646–56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bertola A, Mathews S, Ki SH, Wang H, Gao B. Mouse model of chronic and binge ethanol feeding (the NIAAA model) Nat Protoc. 2013;8:627–37. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mathews S, Xu M, Wang H, Bertola A, Gao B. Animals models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases Animal models of alcohol-induced liver disease: pathophysiology, translational relevance, and challenges. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306:819–23. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00041.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Keegan A, Martini R, Batey R. Ethanol-related liver injury in the rat: a model of steatosis, inflammation and pericentral fibrosis. J Hepatol. 1995;23:591–600. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Issa R, Zhou X, Trim N, Millward-Sadler H, Krane S, Benyon C, et al. Mutation in collagen-I that confers resistance to the action of collagenase results in failure of recovery from CCl 4 -induced liver fibrosis, persistence of activated hepatic stellate cells, and diminished hepatocyte regeneration. FASEB J. 2003;17:47–9. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0494fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES