Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Mar 6;8:4098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22350-5

Cooperative catalysis of cellulose nanofiber and organocatalyst in direct aldol reactions

Kyohei Kanomata 1, Naoko Tatebayashi 1, Xin Habaki 1, Takuya Kitaoka 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5840413  PMID: 29511253

Abstract

Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) are finding a wide range of applications in the forthcoming sustainable society because of their carbon-neutral renewability and superior physicochemical properties. Here, we first show a cooperative organocatalysis by combining TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) and proline to enhance the catalytic efficiency in a direct aldol reaction. The yields of proline-catalyzed aldol products drastically increased in the presence of catalytically-inactive TOCN. This effect was also achieved by simply adding the TOCN to the reaction conditions where various proline analogues including structurally simple pyrrolidine and piperidine were used instead of proline. TOCN was superior to physically-pulverized CNF in the organocatalytic efficiency, and the nanofibrillation of cellulose microfibrils in reaction media was essential to induce the drastic enhancement in catalytic activity. The present finding will bring a new entry in the applications of CNFs, and open up a new phase in developing highly efficient molecular transformations in green chemical industries.

Introduction

Cellulose is the key material to unlocking the gate toward a forthcoming sustainable society, because not only of its huge abundance and carbon-neutral renewability, but also its fascinating physicochemical properties, which are equivalent or sometimes superior to those of artificial and synthetic materials. Native cellulose, β-1,4-d-glucopyranose homo-polymer, forms highly crystalline structures with regular hierarchical assembly of extended chains in parallel alignment, leading to the construction of very fine nanofibers with 3–50 nm widths, especially those in wood cell walls. Therefore, cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) have attracted much attention both in academic and industrial circles, because of their well-defined architectures, which result in high mechanical strength like steel, low thermal expansion rate like quartz, high aspect ratios like carbon nanofibers, high transparency like plastics, and high chemical resistance like ceramics1–3. Thus, the applications of CNFs have been intensively studied for composite fillers4, electronic devices5,6, gas barrier films7, and various gels in wet and aero forms8,9. These applications have been aimed to design structural materials using the superior physical properties of CNFs.

The next-generation trends of applying CNFs have occupied much interest in catalytic transformations, through harnessing their characteristic and large surface areas via functional tuning. Serizawa et al. have reported hydrolysis of esters, monophosphates, and peptides in which acid-hydrolyzed cellulose nanowhiskers act as a catalyst, although the reactions require several days to proceed10,11. Metal nanoparticles like Pt, Pd, Ag, and Au deposited onto the surfaces of CNFs have been employed in various catalytic reactions12 such as hydrogenation of carbonyls13, reduction of 4-nitrophenol14, and carbon–carbon bond forming reactions15. Very fine and rigid CNFs are suitable for immobilization and exposure of metal nanocatalysts, demonstrating high catalytic performances.

Organocatalysts have emerged as an alternative of rare metal catalysts in the past two decades, because of their chemically stable, functionally designable, and environmentally benign nature. Proline, a natural amino acid, has played a central role in various organocatalysis since pioneering work by List and co-workers16,17. Proline catalyzes the direct intermolecular aldol reactions between ketones and aldehydes to provide β-hydroxyketones, which are privileged structures in various pharmaceutical molecules. Proline, however, has been suffering from very low catalytic activities and poor solubility in common organic solvents, often resulting in extremely high catalyst loadings. Much effort has been made to improve the reaction efficiency, including the structural design of catalysts18–20, optimization of reaction conditions21, and employment of some additives22–28. During our challenge to develop catalytic systems by utilizing CNFs, we recorded an unexpected effect of CNFs on the catalytic efficiency of proline-mediated aldol reaction. Herein, we first report a unique combination of CNF and proline to enhance the efficiency of organocatalytic aldol reaction significantly (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustration of proline-catalyzed aldol reaction on cellulose nanofiber (CNF). R = CH2OH or COONa.

Results and Discussion

Among various CNFs prepared by several different methods, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) was focused on in this work for the initial screening because it provides a well-defined nanostructure with the narrowest fiber width (3–5 nm), and the largest specific surface area among those ever reported; carboxylate groups introduced to the surfaces of crystalline CNFs can facilitate disintegration of bundled nanofibers by electrostatic repulsion and osmotic effects in solvents29. Characterization of CNF and TOCN used in this study is shown in Figures S1–S3 in the Supplementary Information (SI). The aldol reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (4-NBA) with acetone was performed in the presence of proline (Table 1). The reaction efficiency was quite low in methanol, even when a large amount of proline (10 mol% against 4-NBA) was used, and the corresponding aldol adduct was obtained in a low yield (entry 1). By contrast, the addition of TOCN to the present reaction (equivalent weight to 4-NBA), significantly enhanced the reaction efficiency up to 86% yield (entry 2). TOCN alone did not promote the reaction at all (entry 3). These results evidently indicate that catalytically-inactive TOCN enhances the catalytic activity of proline in the aldol reaction. This is in sharp contrast to widely explored polymer-supported proline catalysts, which generally diminishes the catalytic activity30. The ratio of TOCN to 4-NBA was also investigated (entries 4–6). The yield was improved according to the increase of the amount of TOCN, and reached the maximum when the weight/weight ratio was 1:1 (entries 4, 5 and 2). Further increase of TOCN slightly diminished the reaction yield (entry 6). The conventional conditions of proline-catalyzed aldol reactions require considerably high catalyst loading (up to 30 mol%) to obtain the products in an acceptable yield16. Conversely, reducing the catalyst loading causes drastic decrease in the reaction efficiency31. On the other hand, our methodology succeeded in significantly reducing the catalyst loading to afford high yields under the mild and environmentally-benign reaction conditions. It is noteworthy that the present reaction can proceed in methanol, which is not a common solvent for aldol reactions catalyzed by proline and its derivatives. It is likely essential to employ suitable solvents for keeping the dispersion of TOCN stable, because acetonitrile and toluene with poor affinity for CNFs were less effective (see the SI for solvent screening; Table S1). Some additives, such as acids22, bases22, and water23–25 have been intensively studied for proline (and its derivatives) catalysis of aldol reactions in literature, and positive effects of water have been revealed. Detailed mechanistic studies suggested that water suppresses the formation of the off-cycle intermediate23, or in some cases, mediates a proton relay in a transition state26. Hydrogen bond donors such as diols27 and thioureas28 were also identified as effective additives to improve the solubility of proline in nonpolar organic solvents. TOCN used in this study possessed large amounts of carboxylates on the surface, which may potentially act as acidic and/or basic centers in organocatalysis; however, the carboxylate content of TOCNs had nearly no contribution to the reaction efficiency (see the SI; Table S2). In this study, the reaction using TOCN with lower carboxylate content (0.43 mmol/g-TOCN) proceeded similarly as compared to that with higher carboxylate content (1.68 mmol/g-TOCN). Therefore, our method is clearly different from these conventional systems, and the addition of TOCN disclosed here provides an entirely new approach to organocatalytic methodologies.

Table 1.

Effects of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) addition on proline-catalyzed aldol reaction of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (4-NBA) with acetone.

graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry (S)-Proline TOCN/4-NBA ratioa Yield (%)b
1 + 0 12c
2 + 1.0 86d
3 − 1.0 <3
4 + 0.3 18
5 + 0.5 26
6 + 2.0 72
Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was performed with 200 mg of 4-NBA (1.33 mmol), 200 mg of TOCN (COONa: 0.290 mmol), 8 mL of acetone (20 vol%), and 10 mol% of proline in methanol (32 mL). aWeight/weight ratio of TOCN/4-NBA. bIsolated yield. cEnantiomeric ratio (e.r.) of the product was 69:31 (R:S), which was determined by chiral stationary phase supercritical fluid chromatography. de.r. = 55:45 (R:S).

With the prominent effect of TOCN demonstrated, the generality of catalysts was investigated. Here, the aldol reaction was performed for a series of proline analogues with or without TOCN (Table 2). The enhancement of the reaction rates was observed for (R)-proline as well as (S)-proline, suggesting that the chirality of proline does not affect the catalytic enhancement (entry 1). The reaction rates were also accelerated by adding TOCN with azetidinecarboxylic acid (entry 2) and tetrazole-type catalyst (entry 3). Furthermore, an effect was also observed to some extent with amide-type catalysts (entry 4) and even with pyrrolidine (entry 5) and piperidine (entry 6). The enhancement of the reaction rate is salient when there were acid functionalities in the catalyst molecules (entries 1–3), although they are not prerequisite for the present reaction system (entries 4–6). The acid functionalities are engaged in the stabilization of the transition state in proline-mediated aldol reactions32,33. Thus, the reaction with the catalysts bearing acid functionalities smoothly afforded the aldol product, whereas other catalysts without acid moieties provided several byproducts along with the desired aldol product, resulting in relatively low yields. Moreover, the yield remained low even in the presence of TOCN when pipecolic acid was used as the catalyst (entry 7). Pipecolic acid probably does not have a catalytic potency, regardless of the presence of TOCN.

Table 2.

Aldol reactions in the presence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) using proline analogues as the catalyst.

graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figb_HTML.gif
Entry Catalyst Yield (%)a TOCN(−)/(+) Entry Catalyst Yield (%)a TOCN(−)/(+)
1 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figc_HTML.gif 8/83 5 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figg_HTML.gif 20/63
2 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figd_HTML.gif 4/72 6 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figh_HTML.gif 10/57
3 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Fige_HTML.gif 8/78 7 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figi_HTML.gif <3/4
4 graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figf_HTML.gif <3/16
Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise noted, the reactions were performed with 300 mg of TOCN (COONa: 0.435 mmol), 300 mg of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1.99 mmol), 10 mL of acetone (20 vol%) and 10 mol% of catalyst in methanol (40 mL). aIsolated yield.

We verified the effects of nanofibrillation of cellulose on the enhancement of catalytic efficiency (Table 3). Because the TOCN used in this study is a crystalline nanofiber densely bearing carboxylate groups as sodium salts on its surface (COONa: 1.45 mmol/g-TOCN, 21.8 mol% to 4-NBA in the present reaction conditions), the effects of nanofibrillation and carboxylate groups on the catalytic efficiency were examined independently. Thus, the addition of physically-nanofibrillated cellulose nanofiber prepared by an aqueous counter collision method34, which was free of carboxylate groups, also enhanced the catalytic efficiency, although prolonged reaction time was required to achieve high yield (entry 1). The effectiveness of physically-nanofibrillated CNF is lower compared with that of TOCN, even though the carboxylate-free CNF had high crystallinity (Figure S2) and nanodispersibility (Figure S3). This is probably because the fiber width of CNF (>10 nm) is thicker than that of TOCN (3–5 nm); hence, physically-nanofibrillated CNF could have a lower surface area than that of ultrathin TOCN (Figure S1). As for TOCN, the catalytic enhancement was very sensitive to the dispersibility of TOCN in methanol; gel-like aggregation of TOCN sometimes occurring during solvent-exchange procedure and/or dispersion in methanol completely lost the effect. These results strongly suggest that nanofibrillation of cellulose microfibrils is essential to enhance the catalytic activity. The addition of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose in a pulp fiber form without any fibrillation processing (TOC pulp; carboxylate content; 1.76 mmol/g-TOC pulp), which bears similar amount of carboxylate groups as the TOCN used in Table 1, did not improve the catalytic efficiency, and the yield remained low even after prolonged reaction time (entry 2). A slight increase in the yield can be attributed to the partial nanofibrillation of the surface of pulp fibers by the TEMPO oxidation. The effects of carboxylate groups were further studied; thus, the yield of the reaction with sodium acetate, whose molar amount was identical to that of carboxylate groups in TOCN, was as low as that without any additives (entry 3 vs Table 1, entry 1). Besides, as above described, TOCNs with different carboxylate contents of 0.43 and 1.68 mmol/g-TOCN did not show any significant difference in the reaction efficiency (see the SI; Table S2). Next, structural importance of crystalline nanofiber form was elucidated by comparing TOCN as a solid nanofiber and other polycarboxylates as a macromolecule. Neither sodium polyacrylate nor carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt, being adjusted to have the same amount of carboxylate groups as the TOCN used in Table 1, were effective in this reaction (entries 4 and 5). Thus, we assume that the characteristic nanoarchitectures of CNFs including TOCN must play a critical role in accelerating organocatalytic reactions. In one possible mechanism, some hydrophobic interaction between reactants and CNF surfaces would be involved in the catalytic reactions. The adsorption of aromatic compounds such as benzaldehyde to cellulose surfaces has widely been studied by thermodynamic analysis and molecular modeling35,36. In addition, it is well known that the aromatic residues of tyrosine and tryptophan of various glycohydrolases play an essential role in their strong binding to crystalline cellulose microfibrils37,38. Thus, the crystalline surfaces of CNFs possibly interacts with aromatic 4-NBA to increase its local concentration on the surface, resulting in accelerating the reaction. While many researchers have reported the effects of acidic and basic additives on aldol reactions22,27,28, our proposed reaction system would be completely different from the previous ones in the catalytic mechanism, although partial contribution of carboxylate groups cannot be ruled out. Further investigation is now underway in our laboratory to elucidate the evident effect of the crystalline surfaces of CNFs on organocatalytic behavior.

Table 3.

Verification of nanofibrillation of cellulose on the enhancement of catalytic efficiency.

graphic file with name 41598_2018_22350_Figj_HTML.gif
Entry Additive Yield (%)a
1b Physically-nanofibrillated carboxylate-free CNF 78
2c TOC pulp without nanofibrillation 32
3c Sodium acetate 18
4c Sodium polyacrylate 13
5c Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt 22
Open in a new tab

Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was performed with 200 mg of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1.33 mmol), 8 mL of acetone (20 vol%), and 10 mol% of (S)-proline in methanol (32 mL). aIsolated yield. bThe reaction was performed for 24 h. cThe amount of carboxylate group was set identical at 0.290 mmol in the reaction system by adjusting the dosage of each additive.

Conclusion

In summary, we show, for the first time, an unexpected nature of cellulose nanofibers to enhance significantly the catalytic activity in proline-mediated organocatalytic aldol reaction. Nanofibrillation of cellulose microfibrils is essential for promoting the present reaction system. The novel finding is a new entry in the applications of CNFs. Furthermore, this operationally simple methodology to enhance the catalytic activities brings alternative approaches in developing highly efficient catalytic transformations.

Methods

Materials

TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN, carboxylate content; 1.45 mmol/g-TOCN) and never-dried sulfite pulp were kindly supplied by Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Microcrystalline cellulose (Ceolus ST-100) was kindly supplied by Asahi Kasei Corp (Tokyo, Japan). Other Chemicals of laboratory grade were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) and used without further purification.

Preparation of physically-nanofibrillated cellulose nanofiber

Microcrystalline cellulose (4.5 g; Ceolus ST-100, Asahi Kasei, Tokyo, Japan) was suspended in 300 mL of deionized water (1.5 wt%). The suspension was subjected to the aqueous counter collision method (245 MPa, 175 passes) using high-pressure water jet system equipped with a dual-nozzle chamber of 0.1 mm in diameter (Star Burst Labo, Sugino Machine Limited, Uozu, Japan). The obtained mixture was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min to afford 0.6 wt% of cellulose nanofiber water suspension as a supernatant.

Preparation of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose pulp without nanofibrillation

Never-dried softwood bleached sulfite pulp (31 wt%, 9.68 g; 3.0 g of dried form) was suspended in water (300 mL) containing TEMPO (48 mg) and sodium bromide (300 mg). TEMPO-mediated oxidation was started by adding sodium hypochlorite pentahydrate (4.94 g, 10 mmol per gram of cellulose) to the cellulose suspension. The pH of suspension was maintained to be 10 by adding 0.5 M NaOH with a pH stat for 4 h. the oxidation was quenched by adding ethanol (30 mL). The oxidized cellulose was thoroughly washed with water by centrifugation repeatedly at 4300 × g for 10 min (5 times). The carboxylate content of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose in a pulp fiber form (TOC pulp) was determined by conductometric titration (carboxylate content; 1.76 mmol/g-TOC pulp).

Proline-catalyzed aldol reaction assisted by TOCN

Water suspension of TOCN (1.0 wt% suspended in water, 20 mL, 200 mg of cellulose) was mixed with acetone (30 mL), and the mixture was shaken several times, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min. After the supernatant was removed, fresh acetone was added and the mixture was centrifuged again. This solvent-exchange treatment was repeated five times. The precipitate of TOCN was suspended in methanol (32 mL) and 4-NBA (200 mg, 1.32 mmol), acetone (3.0 mL), and (S)-proline (15.2 mg, 0.132 mmol, 10 mol% for 4-NBA) were added to the methanol suspension. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with NH4Cl aq. and extracted with dichloromethane. After drying over MgSO4 and concentrating, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the product as a pale yellow solid. The product was characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectra. The enantiomeric ratio was determined by supercritical fluid chromatography with a chiral stationary phase.

4-Hydroxy-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butan-2-one

Pale yellow solid; supercritical fluid chromatography analysis; AS-3 (CO2/IPA = 85/15, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm, 40 °C), 0.84 (R), 1.13 (S) min; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.22 (3 H, s), 2.81–2.89 (2 H, m), 3.56 (1 H, brs), 5.27 (1 H, dd, J = 5.6, 2.4 Hz), 7.54 (2 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), 8.21 (2 H, d, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100.5 MHz): δ 30.6, 51.4, 68.8, 123.6, 126.3, 147.1, 150.0, 208.4 (see NMR spectra in the SI).

Data availability statement

All the data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this article and the Supplementary Information file, and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (992KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (T.K.) and by Research Fellowships for Young Scientists from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (K.K. and X.H.). The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Yoshito Abe and Prof. Dr. Daisuke Kanda (Kyushu Univ.) for NMR analysis, and Prof. Dr. Syuntaro Hiradate and Prof. Dr. Yuki Mori (Kyushu Univ.) for XRD analysis. We also thank Nippon Paper Industries Co. Ltd. and Asahi Kasei Corp. for kindly supplying cellulose samples.

Author Contributions

K.K., N.T. and X.H. carried out all the experiments and performed the analytical characterization. T.K. conceived the presented idea. K.K. and T.K. designed research and wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-22350-5.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose Nanocrystals: Chemistry, Self-Assembly, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:3479–3500. doi: 10.1021/cr900339w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giese M, Blusch LK, Khan MK, MacLachlan MJ. Functional Materials from Cellulose-Derived Liquid-Crystal Templates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015;54:2888–2910. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:3941–3994. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00108b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eichhorn SJ, et al. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010;45:1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liew SY, Thielemans W, Walsh DA. Electrochemical capacitance of nanocomposite polypyrrole/cellulose films. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:17926–17933. doi: 10.1021/jp103698p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hsieh M-C, Kim C, Nogi M, Suganuma K. Electrically conductive lines on cellulose nanopaper for flexible electrical devices. Nanoscale. 2013;5:9289–9295. doi: 10.1039/c3nr01951a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fukuzumi H, Fujisawa S, Saito T, Isogai A. Selective Permeation of Hydrogen Gas Using Cellulose Nanofibril Film. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:1706–1709. doi: 10.1021/bm400377e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Olsson RT, et al. Making flexible magnetic aerogels and stiff magnetic nanopaper using cellulose nanofibrils as templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:584–588. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kobayashi Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Aerogels with 3D ordered nanofiber skeletons of liquid-crystalline nanocellulose derivatives as tough and transparent insulators. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014;53:10394–10397. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Serizawa T, Sawada T, Okura H, Wada M. Hydrolytic activities of crystalline cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:613–617. doi: 10.1021/bm4000822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Serizawa T, Sawada T, Wada M. Chirality-specific hydrolysis of amino acid substrates by cellulose nanofibers. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:8827–8829. doi: 10.1039/c3cc44416c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaushik M, Moores A. Review: nanocelluloses as versatile supports for metal nanoparticles and their applications in catalysis. Green Chem. 2016;18:622–637. doi: 10.1039/C5GC02500A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaushik M, et al. Cellulose Nanocrystals as Chiral Inducers: Enantioselective Catalysis and Transmission Electron Microscopy 3D Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:6124–6127. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koga H, et al. Topochemical synthesis and catalysis of metal nanoparticles exposed on crystalline cellulose nanofibers. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:8567. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02754e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cirtiu CM, Dunlop-Brière AF, Moores A. Cellulose nanocrystallites as an efficient support for nanoparticles of palladium: application for catalytichydrogenation and Heck coupling under mild conditions. Green Chem. 2011;13:288–291. doi: 10.1039/C0GC00326C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.List B, Lerner RA, Barbas III CF. Proline-Catalyzed Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:2395–2396. doi: 10.1021/ja994280y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.List B. Proline-catalyzed asymmetric reactions. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:5573–5590. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00516-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tang Z, et al. A Highly Efficient Organocatalyst for Direct Aldol Reactions of Ketones with Aldedydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:9285–9289. doi: 10.1021/ja0510156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krattiger P, Kovasy R, Revell JD, Ivan S, Wennemers H. Increased Structural Complexity Leads to Higher Activity: Peptides as Efficient and Versatile Catalysts for Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1101–1103. doi: 10.1021/ol0500259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wiesner M, Revell JD, Tonazzi S, Wennemers H. Peptide Catalyzed Asymmetric Conjugate Addition Reactions of Aldehydes to Nitroethylene—A Convenient Entry into γ 2 -Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:5610–6511. doi: 10.1021/ja801027s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayashi Y, Tsuboi W, Shoji M, Suzuki N. Application of high pressure induced by water-freezing to the direct catalytic asymmetric three-component List-Barbas-Mannich reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:11208–11209. doi: 10.1021/ja0372513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amedjkouh M. Primary amine catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reaction assisted by water. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2005;16:1411–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2005.02.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.List B, Hoang L, Martin HJ. New mechanistic studies on the proline-catalyzed aldol reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:5839–5842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307979101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pihko PM, Laurikainen KM, Usano A, Nyberg AI, Kaavi JA. Effect of additives on the proline-catalyzed ketone–aldehyde aldol reactions. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.09.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zotova N, Franzke A, Armstrong A, Blackmond DG. Clarification of the role of water in proline-mediated aldol reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:15100–15101. doi: 10.1021/ja0738881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moteki SA, et al. Positive Effect of Water in Asymmetric Direct Aldol Reactions with Primary Amine Organocatalyst: Experimental and ComputationalStudies. Chem. - An Asian J. 2015;10:2112–2116. doi: 10.1002/asia.201500078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou Y, Shan Z. Chiral Diols: A New Class of Additives for Direct Aldol Reaction Catalyzed by L-Proline. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:9510–9512. doi: 10.1021/jo060802y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reis, Ö., Eymur, S., Reis, B. & Demir, A. S. Direct enantioselective aldol reactions catalyzed by a proline–thiourea host–guest complex. Chem. Commun. 1088–1090 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale. 2011;3:71–85. doi: 10.1039/C0NR00583E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benaglia M, Cinquini M, Cozzi F, Puglisi A, Celentano G. Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Supported Proline: A Versatile Catalyst for the Enantioselective Aldol and Iminoaldol Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002;344:533–542. doi: 10.1002/1615-4169(200207)344:5&#x0003c;533::AID-ADSC533&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kano T, Takai J, Tokuda O, Maruoka K. Design fo an Axially Chiral Amino Acid with a Binaphthyl Backbone as an Organocatalylst for a Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005;44:3055–3057. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bahmanyar S, Houk KN, Martin HJ, List B. Quantum Mechanical Predictions of the Stereoselectivities of Proline-Catalyzed Asymmetric Intermolecular Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:2475–2479. doi: 10.1021/ja028812d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allemann C, Gordillo R, Clemente FR, Ha-yeon Cheong P, Houk KN. Theory of Asymmetric Organocatalysis of Aldol and Related Reactions: Rationalizations and Predictions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004;37:558–569. doi: 10.1021/ar0300524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kondo T, Kose R, Naito H, Kasai W. Aqueous counter collision using paired water jets as a novel means of preparing bio-nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;112:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mazeau K, Vergelati C. Atomistic Modeling of the Adsorption of Benzophenone onto Cellulosic Surfaces. Langmuir. 2002;18:1919–1927. doi: 10.1021/la010792q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perez DDS, Ruggiero R, Morais LC, Machado AEH, Mazeau K. Theoretical and Experimental Studies on the Adsorption of Aromatic Compounds onto Cellulose. Langmuir. 2004;20:3151–3158. doi: 10.1021/la0357817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem. J. 2004;382:769–781. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Payne CM, et al. Fungal Cellulases. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:1308–1448. doi: 10.1021/cr500351c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (992KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are included in this article and the Supplementary Information file, and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES