Skip to main content
Case Reports in Urology logoLink to Case Reports in Urology
. 2018 Feb 21;2018:7820717. doi: 10.1155/2018/7820717

A Rare Case of Multifocal Prostatic Blue Nevus

Elias J Farran 1, Preston S Kerr 1, Christopher D Kosarek 1, Joseph Sonstein 1,, Eduardo J Eyzaguirre 2
PMCID: PMC5841115  PMID: 29682392

Abstract

Prostatic blue nevus is a rare benign pathologic diagnosis most commonly diagnosed incidentally on many different types of prostate specimens. Blue nevus is the deposition of stromal melanin characterized by spindle cells within the fibromuscular stroma which stains positive for melanin-specific stains Fontana-Masson and S100 and stains negative for CD68, HMB45, and iron stains. We report the case of a multifocal and bilateral blue nevus in a 52-year-old Hispanic male who presented with an elevated prostate-specific antigen of 4.3 and mild obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms, found by transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. The biopsy also revealed benign prostatic tissue with postatrophic hyperplasia and chronic inflammation. This is the 35th reported case of prostatic blue nevus and the third to show multifocal blue nevus.

1. Introduction

Melanocytic lesions are an often-overlooked pathologic process that occurs in the prostate. Of these extremely rare lesions, the most commonly found is the prostatic blue nevus, also known as pigmented melanocytosis or prostatic pigmentary nevohyperplasia [1]. Blue nevus is the deposition of stromal melanin characterized by spindle cells within the fibromuscular stroma which stains positive for melanin-specific stains Fontana-Masson and S100, while it stains negative for CD68 proteins, HMB45, and iron stains [1]. Blue nevus is asymptomatic and benign and has been incidentally diagnosed following prostatectomy (11 cases), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP, 6 cases), autopsy (5 cases), and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNBx, 2 cases) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Literature review of blue nevus cases.

Source, year Procedure Age (years) Race Extent
Nigogosyan et al. [2], 1963 Autopsy 50 NA Focal

Guillan and Zelman [3], 1970 Autopsy NA NA Focal

Jao et al. [4], 1971 Prostatectomy 76 W Focal

Gardner and Spitz [5], 1971 Autopsy 20 AA Focal

Block et al. [6], 1972 Prostatectomy 66 W Focal

Langley and Weitzner [7], 1974 NA NA W Focal

Tannenbaum [8], 1974 NA NA NA Focal

Rios and Wright [9], 1976 Autopsy 67 AA Focal

Kovi et al. [10], 1977 TURP 65 AA Focal

Ro et al. [11], 1988 TURP 68 AA Focal
TURP 76 W Focal

Botticelli et al. [12], 1989 Prostatectomy 69 W Focal
Prostatectomy 70 W Focal
Prostatectomy 66 NA Focal

Lew et al. [13], 1991 Prostatectomy 80 AA Focal

Martinez Martinez et al. [14], 2017 Prostatectomy 81 NA Focal
Prostatectomy 69 NA Focal

Vesga et al. [15], 1995 NA NA NA Focal

Redondo Martínez et al. [16], 1998 TURP 58 NA Focal

Cuervo Pinna et al. [17], 2001 Prostatectomy 71 NA Focal

Di Nuovo et al. [18], 2002 Needle Biopsy 66 NA Focal

Humphrey [19], 2003 Needle Biopsy 70 NA Focal

Anderco et al. [20], 2010 TURP 69 NA Focal

Kudva and Hegde [21], 2010 TURP 53 NA Focal

Raspollini et al. [22], 2011 Prostatectomy 64 NA Focal

Montalvo and Redrobán [23], 2013 Prostatectomy 63 H Focal

Ponte et al. [24], 2014 Prostatectomy 69 W Multifocal

Ponte et al. [25], 2016 Prostatectomy 74 NA Multifocal

Present report Needle biopsy 52 H Multifocal

AA, African American; H, Hispanic; W, non-Hispanic White, TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate.

2. Case Presentation

A 52-year-old healthy Hispanic male presented to an outpatient urology clinic with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 4.1 along with mild obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. There was no family history of prostate cancer. The physical examination including the digital rectal examination was unremarkable. The patient was seen again 3 months later with a PSA of 4.3 and after discussion with the patient he elected to undergo a 12-core TRUS PNBx. The following month when the biopsy was performed, the PSA had slightly decreased to 3.4. The prostate was visualized in the sagittal and transverse planes via ultrasound probe and was unremarkable. Volume was measured to be 33 cm3 (PSA density of 0.10 ng/mL/g). Final pathology demonstrated blue nevus in one out of six cores on the right and two out of six cores on the left. On microscopic analysis with hematoxylin-eosin stain, individual heavily pigmented spindle cells distributed in between prostatic stroma and glands were noted (Figures 1 and 2). The remaining specimen consisted of benign prostatic tissue with postatrophic hyperplasia and chronic inflammation. The patient's voiding symptoms improved with terazosin and no further workup was undertaken. The patient is now being followed up for routine prostate cancer surveillance as per the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines [26].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Low-power view of blue nevus in the prostate as a cluster of pigmented spindle to round cells in the stroma (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification: ×10).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Individual heavily pigmented spindle cells distributed in between prostatic stroma and glands (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification: ×20).

3. Discussion

Blue nevus is a rare lesion of dermal melanocytes most commonly found in the skin, but it has been reported in the oral mucosa, sclera, cervix, vagina, and prostate [27]. The appearance of this lesion in nonintegumentary tissues is not fully understood; the prevailing hypothesis is that melanoblasts originate in the neural crest and migrate with the mesoderm into connective tissue, where they remain latent until maturing into melanocytes [28]. Proliferation induced by inflammation or other insults of these latent melanoblasts can explain acquired cases of blue nevi [29]. An alternative hypothesis proposes development from the neoplastic growth of Schwann cells of dermal nerves which became melanogenetic as they proliferated [30].

Blue nevus grossly appears as multiple brown to black streaks or nodules that range in size from 0.1 cm to 2.0 cm [1]. Microscopically, prostatic blue nevus consists of stromal cells that contain finely granular brown or black pigment, which may also be seen in the extracellular matrix [11]. The cells can extensively infiltrate the surrounding fibromuscular stroma individually or as irregularly clustered collections [4]. The pigment-laden cells are usually spindle in shape with bipolar, elongated dendritic cytoplasmic processes but can also be round, ovoid, or polygonal (Figures 1 and 2). The nuclei have been described as centrally located and often obscured by the abundant melanin present in the cytoplasm [2]. It is also important to recognize the benign nature of these lesions and not confuse them with more aggressive melanocytic lesions of the prostate such as malignant melanoma. Hypercellularity, diffuse atypia, increased mitotic activity, and positive immunostaining for HMB45 should help in differentiating malignant melanoma from blue nevus.

4. Conclusion

Review of the literature indicates that blue nevus typically presents as a single focus and is characteristically diagnosed on TURP and prostatectomy specimens. Although no risk factors for blue nevus have been identified, our discovery of just the second case in a Hispanic male may suggest variability in risk among different races/ethnicities [23]. Of the other 34 reported cases of blue nevus, only two have shown multifocal blue nevus [24, 25]. Diagnosis is most often made on prostatectomy or TURP specimens; however, there have been two reported cases documenting diagnosis by TRUS PNBx, making this the third reported case [18, 19]. As in all other cases, blue nevus presented in an asymptomatic fashion. The importance of this case lies in the rarity of such a diagnosis as it is highly likely that both urologist and pathologist alike have not come across such a diagnosis. The recognition of the benign nature of blue nevus and multifocal blue nevus need to be emphasized as further workup and surveillance outside of routine prostate cancer screening carries no benefit. As always, all routine prostate cancer screening should follow the shared decision-making mantra endorsed by the AUA [26].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Dailey V. L., Hameed O. Blue nevus of the prostate. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2011;135(6):799–802. doi: 10.5858/2010-0022-RS.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nigogosyan G., De La Pava S., Pickren J. W., Woodruff M. W. Blue nevus of the prostate gland. Cancer. 1963;16(9):1097–1099. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196309)16:9<1097::AID-CNCR2820160902>3.0.CO;2-F. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196309)16:9<1097::AID-CNCR2820160902>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guillan R. A., Zelman S. The Incidence and Probable Origin of Melanin in the Prostate. The Journal of Urology. 1970;104(1):151–153. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)61689-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jao W., Fretzin D. F., Christ M. L., Prinz L. M. Blue nevus of the prostate gland. Archives of Pathology. 1971;91(2):187–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gardner W. A., Spitz W. U. Melanosis of the Prostate Gland. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1971;56(6):762–764. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/56.6.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Block N. L., Weber D., Schinella R. Blue Nevi and Other Melanotic Lesions of the Prostate: Report of 3 Cases and Review of the Literature. The Journal of Urology. 1972;107(1):85–87. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)60954-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Langley J. W., Weitzner S. Blue Nevus and Melanosis of Prostate. The Journal of Urology. 1974;112(3):359–361. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59731-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tannenbaum M. Differential diagnosis in uropathology III. Melanotic lesions of prostate: Blue nevus and prostatic epithelial melanosis. Urology. 1974;4(5):617–621. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(74)90508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rios C. N., Wright J. R. Melanosis of the Prostate Gland: Report of a Case with Neoplastic Epithelium Involvement. The Journal of Urology. 1976;115(5):616–617. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59307-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kovi J., Jackson A. G., Jackson M. A. Blue nevus of the prostate: ultrastructural study. Urology. 1977;9(5):576–578. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90260-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ro J. Y., Grignon D. J., Ayala A. G., Hogan S. F., Tetu B., Ordonez N. G. Blue nevus and melanosis of the prostate. Electron-microscopic and immunohistochemical studies. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1988;90(5):530–535. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/90.5.530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Botticelli A. R., Di Gregorio C., Losi L., Fano R. A., Manenti A. Melanosis (pigmented melanocytosis) of the prostate gland. European Urology. 1989;16(3):229–232. doi: 10.1159/000471576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lew S., Richter S., Jelin N., Siegal A. A blue naevus of the prostate: a light microscopic study including an investigation of S‐100 protein positive cells in the normal and in the diseased gland. Histopathology. 1991;18(5):443–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martinez Martinez C., Garcia Gonzalez R., Castañeda Casanova A. Blue Nevus of the Prostate: Report of Two New Cases with Immunohistochemical and Electron-Microscopic Studies. European Urology. 2017;22(4):339–342. doi: 10.1159/000474783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vesga Molina F., Acha Pérez M., Llarena Ibarguren R., Pertusa Peña C. Intraprostatic blue nevus. Archivos Españoles de Urología. 1995;48(10):985–986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Redondo Martínez E., Rey López A., Díaz Cascajo C. Blue nevus of the prostate. Differential diagnosis of prostatic pigmented lesions. Archivos Españoles de Urología. 1998;51(3):286–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cuervo Pinna C., Godoy Rubio E., Parra Escobar J. L., Sánchez Blasco E., Valverde Valverde J., Moreno Casado J. Prostatic blue nevus. Terminology standardization of prostatic pigmented lesions. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2001;25(3):245–247. doi: 10.1016/S0210-4806(01)72608-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Nuovo F., Sironi M. G., Spinelli M. True prostatic blue nevus associated with melanosis: case report, histogenesis and review of the literature. Advances in Clinical Pathology. 2002;6(3-4):135–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Humphrey P. A. Prostate Pathology. Chicago, Ill, USA: American Society for Clinical Pathology; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anderco D., Lazăr E., Taban S., Miclea F., Dema A. Prostatic blue nevus. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2010;51(3):555–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kudva R., Hegde P. Blue nevus of the prostate. Indian Journal of Urology. 2010;26(2):301–302. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.65411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Raspollini M. R., Masieri L., Tosi N., Santucci M. Blue nevus of the prostate: incidental finding in radical prostatectomy specimen with a pre-operative echographic image of peripheral hypoechogenic nodule. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2011;83(4):210–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Montalvo N., Redrobán L. Unusual histopathological diagnosis of prostatic blue nevus: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2013;7(1) doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ponte R., Ravetti J. L., Pacella M., Toncini C. Multifocal blue nevus of the prostate: a case report. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 2014;36(6):335–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ponte R., Ravetti J. L., Calamaro P., Pacella M., Toncini C. Another case of multifocal blue nevus of the prostate. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 2016;38(1):57–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carter H. B. American urological association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: Process and rationale. BJU International. 2013;112(5):543–547. doi: 10.1111/bju.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Craddock K. J., Bandarchi B., Khalifa M. A. Blue nevi of the Müllerian tract: case series and review of the literature. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2007;11(4):284–289. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318046eaf3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ahmad M., Reams W. M. The development of melanoblasts from leg bud mesenchyme grown in the celom of chick embryos. Annals of Anatomy. 1978;143(5):501–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hori Y., Kawashima M., Oohara K., Kukita A. Acquired, bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1984;10(6):961–964. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(84)80313-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nakai T., Rappaport H. A study of the histogenesis of experimental melanotic tumors resembling cellular blue nevi: The evidence in support of their neurogenic origin. The American Journal of Pathology. 1963;43:175–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Urology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES