Abstract
Background and Aims:
One potential complication of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is reduced dynamic compliance, saturation for peripheral oxygenation (SpO2) and increased sputum in patients that are mechanically ventilated. Airway clearance technique is the treatment given for patients on mechanically ventilator with ARDS. The purpose of the case series is to know the immediate effects of Acapella® on dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) in subject with ARDS.
Subjects and Methods:
Patients who are on ventilator for more than 48hrs were included in the study. Readings for Cdyn, SpO2 were noted at baseline, immediately post treatment, 10, 20, 30 and 60minutes. Pre and post treatment sputum volume was also noted.
Results:
Five patients were included with age range of 25 to 75 years. Clinical improvement was seen immediately after treatment in Cdyn and SpO2. There was not much change in sputum volume.
Conclusion:
Acapella® increased the dynamic compliance of lungs and sputum clearance in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.
Keywords: Acapella®, acute respiratory distress syndrome, airways clearance technique, mechanical ventilation
INTRODUCTION
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening complication causing respiratory insufficiency in critically ill patients. This syndrome is associated with a high mortality rate varying between 30% and 60%.[1]
In mechanically ventilated ARDS patients, there is increased mucus production and decreased dynamic compliance (Cdyn) due to impairment of mucociliary clearance, lesions caused by suctioning, inadequate humidification, administration of paralytic agents,[2,3,4,5] and drugs which decrease chest wall tone.[6] Airway clearance techniques are commonly used for clearing secretions, improving gas exchange, oxygenation, and work of breathing.[7,8,9,10,11,12]
Acapella® is an airway clearance device that combines the resistive features of a positive expiratory pressure device with oscillations which diminishes the mucus adhesiveness and decrease the collapsibility of airways.[13]
Earlier study using Acapella® demonstrated improvement in sputum clearance, respiratory mechanics, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) in mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).[14]
This case series reports the immediate effects of Acapella® on the dynamic compliance of the lungs (Cdyn), SpO2, and sputum volume.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Manipal Academy of Higher Education and ethical clearance was taken from Manipal hospital, Bangalore Written consent form was taken from relatives of all patients. Five patients over 18 years of age on mechanical ventilator for more than 48 h with positive end-expiratory pressure ≤8, FIO2 ≤0.6, heart rate ≤125/min, SpO2 ≥88%, blood pressure 110/70 mmHg (±20 units), on paralytic agents, chest X-ray having bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, were included in this study. Patients with rib fracture and chest trauma, absence of cough reflex, untreated pneumothorax or pleural effusion, cardiac arrhythmia, intracranial hypertension (>20 mmHg), tracheal bleeding were excluded from the study.
Prestudy Cdyn was calculated, SpO2 was seen on monitor, and Wet Sputum Volume was measured in the empty volumetric jar connected with the closed vacuum suctioning tube.
Acapella® is connected to the expiratory port of the mechanical ventilator with frequency dial set at minimum for 15 min. The exhaled air from the patient comes out of this expiratory port where the Acapella® is attached and passes through a pivoting cone and generates airflow vibrations between 0 and 30 Hz. These oscillations were felt and seen on the mechanical ventilator graphs. This generates a back pressure which in turn splits and opens the peripheral airways, which lessens airway collapse distally. This cause collateral ventilation, mucus can be mobilized from distal to peripheral airways to the larger and more central airways, thereby enhancing secretion clearance. Passive limb movements were also given during this period. At the end of the treatment session, Cdyn was calculated and SpO2 was recorded immediately. Suctioning of the airway was done by a nursing staff of medical intensive care unit posttreatment. Sputum volume was measured by checking the reading of the sputum collecting volumetric jar and subtracting the amount of distilled water use to flush the secretions posttreatment. Cdyn and SpO2 were noted postimmediately, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes.
Analysis
Descriptive analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version (SPSS 20.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) Mean and standard deviation were taken for all the outcome measures. Paired t-test was used to see the statistical significance at baseline and 60 min postintervention.
RESULTS
Demographics
Four females and one male with an age range of 27–71 years old (mean 44.8) were included in the study. Table 1 shows patient's characteristics such as gender, age, mode of ventilator, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the patients.
Table 1.
Patient information

Dynamic Lung Compliance
For Cdyn, there was an improvement seen at all the time intervals. There is a significant change (P = 0.004) at 60 min posttreatment [Tables 2 and 5].
Table 2.
Dynamic lung compliance (ml/cmH2O)

Table 5.
sputum volume (ml)

Oxygen saturation
There was no improvement for patient 1, 3, and 4. SpO2 was improved in patient 2 and 5. There is no significant change in SpO2 at the end of 60 minutes [Tables 3 and 5].
Table 3.
Mean (standard deviation) for dynamic compliance, oxygen saturation and sputum volume at baseline and 60 min posttreatment

Sputum volume
There is an improvement of 20 ml in one patient only. Data were analyzed and showed (P = 0.008) which is significant [Tables 4 and 5].
Table 4.
Oxygen saturation (%)

Pre- and post-analysis showed significant improvement in dynamic lung compliance and sputum volume.
DISCUSSION
This case series describes the immediate effects of Acapella® on Cdyn, SpO2, and sputum volume for patients on mechanical ventilator with ARDS. Significant improvement was seen in Cdyn and sputum volume.
Cdyn is improved for all five patients. A previous study on mechanically ventilated COPD patients showed improvement from 3rd day after using Acapella®.[14]
In the present study, the reason for increase in Cdyn could be due to the movement of secretion to central airway promoting expansion of affected lung.
There was an improvement of 3% and 1% at the end of 60 min in patient number 4 and 5, respectively. Minimal clinical important difference for SpO2 is ±4.[14] The mean and standard deviation from baseline and 60 min was 95.40 ± 4.50 and 95.20 ± 2.95 for all patients.
There was significant difference found in sputum collection from baseline and 60 min which is similar to the study of Abu-Rayan et al.[15] This could be due to the enhanced mucociliary clearance caused by the oscillatory effects of the Acapella®.
There was no adverse event reported during the intervention.
CONCLUSION
Acapella® increased the Cdyn of lungs in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.
Future recommendations
There is a need for further studies to be performed on large scale to study the long-term effects of Acapella® on weaning from mechanical ventilator, the length of hospital stay, and health-related quality of life in patients with ARDS.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Singh G, Gladdy G, Chandy TT, Sen N. Incidence and outcome of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome in the surgical Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:659–65. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.142175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suh M, Heitkemper M, Smi CK. Chest physiotherapy on the respiratory mechanics and elimination of sputum in paralyzed and mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury: A pilot study. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2011;5:60–9. doi: 10.1016/S1976-1317(11)60014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Konrad F, Schreiber T, Brecht-Kraus D, Georgieff M. Mucociliary transport in ICU patients. Chest. 1994;105:237–41. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Judson MA, Sahn SA. Mobilization of secretions in ICU patients. Respir Care. 1994;39:213–26. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Branson RD. Secretion management in the mechanically ventilated patient. Respir Care. 2007;52:1328–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nunn JF. Effects of anaesthesia on respiration. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:54–62. doi: 10.1093/bja/65.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Frownfelter DL, Dean E. Principles and Practice of Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frownfelter D. Chest physical therapy and airway care. In: Barnes TA, editor. Core Textbook of Respiratory Care Practice. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dean E, Ross J. Discordance between cardiopulmonary physiology and physical therapy. Toward a rational basis for practice. Chest. 1992;101:1694–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Myslinski MJ, Scanlan CL. Bronchial hygiene therapy. In: shelled DC, editor. Egan's Fundamental of Respiratory Care. 8th ed. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Publishers; 2003. pp. 883–910. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hardy KA. A review of airway clearance: New techniques, indications, and recommendations. Respir Care. 1994;39:440. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hardy KA, Anderson BD. Noninvasive clearance of airway secretions. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1996;2:323–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Volsko TA, DiFiore J, Chatburn RL. Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: Acapella versus flutter. Respir Care. 2003;48:124–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tang J, Mandrusiak A, Russell T. The feasibility and validity of a remote pulse oximetry system for pulmonary rehabilitation: A pilot study. Int J Telemed Appl 2012. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/798791. 798791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abu-Rayan MA, Afifi MK, Othman HA, El-Ganady AA, Mikhael BN. Evaluation of the single and combined roles of positive expiratory pressure device and conventional multimodality chest physiotherapy in mechanically ventilated COPD patients. Bull Alex Fac Med. 2009;45:355–64. [Google Scholar]
