To the Editor
Quinacrine, a compounded antimalarial, has been used for patients intolerant or unresponsive to hydroxychloroquine. In March 2016 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) raised safety concerns about quinacrine-associated aplastic anemia. Additionally, the Office of New Drugs (OND) advised that although quinacrine may be safe at the 100 mg/day dose prescribed for rheumatic skin diseases, generalists might prescribe this drug at higher dosages and for alternative indications that have yet to be formally studied. Consequently, this orphan drug may no longer be compounded or might become effectively unavailable with prescription requiring an IND, IRB approval, patient consent, and toxicity reporting.1
To evaluate the need for continued access, we surveyed providers at various institutions to determine their quinacrine prescribing practices. Two rheumatologic skin disease specialists (Drs. MC and CB) from Texas, estimated having seen 96 and 30 patients on quinacrine within the last year but could not provide exact figures. An academic dermatologist (Dr. RDS) from Utah, prescribed quinacrine to 98 patients over a 3-year period (see acknowledgements). We examine the extent of quinacrine use and its associated toxicities at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP).
Through an electronic search of HUP’s data stores from June 1st, 2015–May 31st, 2016, we found that out of 899,990 active patients 241 (0.027%) were prescribed quinacrine. Most prescriptions were ordered by dermatology (n=177) and rheumatology (n=75) with 18 individuals prescribed by multiple departments. Records from 111 patients who filled prescriptions at the hospital pharmacy indicate that quinacrine was prescribed to 63.1% (n=70) by dermatologists, 34.2% (n=38) by rheumatologists, and 2.7% (n=3) by internists. Although the OND stated that maintaining quinacrine availability would open access to “any prescriber…for any use…at any dose,” we found that quinacrine has almost exclusively been prescribed by rheumatic skin disease specialists at our center.1
Secondly, we retrospectively analyzed two NIH-funded prospective longitudinal databases of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) (n=421) and dermatomyositis (DM) (n=215) initiated in 2007 by Dr. Victoria P. Werth’s research team. All patients were seen at HUP’s outpatient autoimmune skin disease clinic. Those without antimalarial history (n=73) or scant records (n=25) were excluded. Over half (58.7%, n=316) of the remaining 538 patients used quinacrine. Quinacrine users (n=314) were more likely to have smoking history (current=20.6%, past=28.8%, never=50%) than non-users (n=222, current=16.2%, past=19.4%, never=64.4%), χ2 (2, N=536) =10.79, p=0.0045, likely representing treatment escalations required in smokers (Table 1).2
Table 1.
Total on Antimalarials N = 538 N (%) |
Quinacrine Users N = 316 N (%) |
Percentage of Quinacrine Users per Demographic Category % |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean Age | 52.3 | 52.9 | ||
Gender | ||||
Female | 458 (85.1) | 273 (86.4) | 59.6 | |
Male | 80 (14.9) | 43 (13.6) | 53.8 | |
Race | ||||
Black | 125 (23.2) | 76 (24.1) | 60.8 | |
White | 376 (69.9) | 217 (68.7) | 57.7 | |
Asian | 16 (3.0) | 7 (2.2) | 43.8 | |
Other | 18 (3.3) | 14 (4.4) | 77.8 | |
Unknown | 3 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) | 66.7 | |
Ethnicity | ||||
Hispanic | 15 (2.8) | 10 (3.2) | 66.7 | |
Not-Hispanic | 519 (96.5) | 303 (95.9) | 58.4 | |
Unknown | 4 (0.7) | 3 (0.9) | 75 | |
Smoking History | ||||
Never | 301 (55.9) | 158 (50) | 52.5 | |
Current | 101 (18.8) | 65 (20.6) | 64.4 * | |
Past | 134 (24.9) | 91 (28.8) | 67.9 * | |
Unknown | 2 (0.4) | 2 (0.6) | 100 | |
Disease Type | ||||
CLE | 368 (68.4) | 222 (70.3) | 60.3 | |
Dermatomyositis | 170 (31.6) | 94 (29.7) | 55.3 | |
CLE subtype | ||||
Discoid Total | 162 (30.1) | 114 (21.2) | 70.4 | |
Discoid + SLE | 64 (11.9) | 53 (16.8) | 84.7 | |
Discoid + LP | 6 (1.1) | 6 (1.9) | 100 | |
LET Total | 24 (4.5) | 12 (3.8) | 50 | |
LET +SLE | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.3) | 100 | |
LP | 4 (0.7) | 1 (0.3) | 25 | |
Hypertrophic | 3 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) | 66.7 | |
Chilblains | 2 (0.4) | 2 (0.6) | 100 | |
Lupus Pernio | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.3) | 100 | |
SCLE Total | 70 (16.9) | 41 (12.9) | 58.6 | |
SCLE + SLE | 19 (3.5) | 10 (3.2) | 52.6 | |
ACLE Total | 12 (2.2) | 4 (1.3) | 33.4 | |
ACLE + SLE | 11 (2.0) | 4 (1.3) | 36.7 | |
Total SLE | 64 (11.9) | 41 (13.0) | 64.1 | |
History of HCQ a | 534 (99.3) | 312 (98.7) | 58.4 | |
History of CQ b | 98 (18.2) | 85 (26.9) | 86.7 |
Quinacrine users are significantly more likely to have smoking history than non-users, p = 0.0045.
HCQ = hydroxychloroquine,
CQ = Chloroquine
Of the quinacrine users, 36 patients were started recently and details of the course are unavailable. Quinacrine was started in the majority (86.1%, n=241) of the remaining 280 due to hydroxychloroquine refractoriness, consistent with studies on its efficacy for recalcitrant disease.3 Following initiation, quinacrine was discontinued in 50.4% (n=141), hydroxychloroquine in 44.5% (n=237), and chloroquine in 62.2% (n=61). Patients on these medications are not mutually exclusive as most were on either hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine in combination with quinacrine. Notably, quinacrine was discontinued more often than other antimalarials due to cost and access barriers (quinacrine: 23.4%, n=33; hydroxychloroquine: 4.6%, n=11; chloroquine: 16.4%, n=10) rather than side effects (quinacrine: 30.5%, n=43; hydroxychloroquine: 42.6%, n=101; chloroquine: 49.2%, n=30) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Quinacrine N (%) |
HCQ * N (%) |
CQ ** N (%) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 43 | 101 | 30 | |
Skin | ||||
Dyschromia | 8 (18.6) | 2 (2.0) | 0 | |
Pruritic Rash | 11 (25.6) | 36 (35.6) | 7 (23.4) | |
Bullous Rash | 0 | 2 (2.0) | 0 | |
CLE exacerbation | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Alopecia | 0 | 5 (5.0) | 3 (10.0) | |
Gastrointestinal | ||||
N / V / D / C a | 8 (18.6) | 20 (19.8) | 6 (20.0) | |
Transaminitis | 2 (4.7) b | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Dysgeusia | 2 (4.7) | 0 | 1 (3.4) | |
Neurologic | ||||
Headache / Dizziness | 3 (7.0) | 10 (9.9) | 1 (3.4) | |
Tinnitus | 1 (2.3) | 2 (2.0) | 0 | |
Hearing Loss | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Insomnia | 1 (2.3) | 0 | 1 (3.4) | |
Anxiety | 1 (2.3) | 0 | 0 | |
Mental Fog | 1 (2.3) | 3 (3.0) | 1 (3.4) | |
Auditory Hallucinations | 0 | 1 (1.0) g | 0 | |
Nightmares | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Ocular | 0 | 18 (17.8) | 10 (33.4) | |
Musculoskeletal | ||||
Myopathy | 1 (2.3) | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Muscle Cramps | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Joint Pains | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Shakes / Tremors | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Hematologic / Oncologic | ||||
Thrombocytopenia | 1 (2.3) c | 0 | 0 | |
Leukopenia | 1 (2.3) d | 0 | 0 | |
Pancytopenia | 1 (2.3) e | 0 | 0 | |
Other | ||||
Hypersensitivity | 1 (2.3) f | 0 | 0 | |
Lethargy/Fatigue | 4 (9.3) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (3.4) | |
Weight Gain | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | |
Palpitations | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
Nausea / Vomiting / Diarrhea / Constipation
Transaminitis was mild. Lab values are available for one case: AST 47 ALT 85
Lab values unclear from records
In setting of lupus flare in patient with SLE-related leukopenia; unclear if drug induced
In the setting of evolving MDS. WBC 2.9, Hematocrit 31.7, Platelets 130K
Dyspnea, body cramping, fatigue, methemoglobinemia; similar reaction on dapsone
Related to supratherapeutic plaquenil dose
HCQ = Hydroxychloroquine;
CQ = Chloroquine
Following side effects, quinacrine was restarted in 27.7% (n=13), hydroxychloroquine in 25.7% (n=26), and chloroquine in 16.7% (n=5). There were two instances of mild transaminitis and three of slight hematological disturbances not clearly attributable to quinacrine. In prior reports of WWII soldiers, 1/500,000 patients experienced aplastic anemia at dosages exceeding 100 mg/day.4,5 Quinacrine’s safety is thus supported by our large experience.
Our study is limited by its retrospective methodology. It is crucial to continue to examine the repercussions of the loss of quinacrine availability considering the lack of suitable alternatives.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Richard Sontheimer, Melissa Costner, and Carolyn Bangert for providing information about their quinacrine prescribing practices. We are also grateful to Ms. Yuliya Borovskiy from the Penn DAC for her assistance with data acquisition and Dr. Andrew Cucchiara for his guidance with Redcap project planning.
Funding Sources: This work was supported by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development and Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development) Merit Review 5 I01 BX000706-04 (PI: Werth) and by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) R21 AR066286 (PI: Werth).
Abbreviations List
- PCAC
Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee
- OND
Office of New Drugs
- IND
Investigational New Drug
- IRB
Institutional Review Board
- HUP
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
- CLE
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
- SLE
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- LP
Lupus Profundus
- LET
Lupus Erythematosus Tumidus
- SCLE
Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
- ACLE
Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
- DM
Dermatomyositis
- WWII
World War II
- HCQ
Hydroxychloroquine
- CQ
Chloroquine
- N / V / D / C
Nausea / Vomiting / Diarrhea / Constipation
- AST
Aspartate Aminotransferase
- ALT
Alanine Aminotransferase
- MDS
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
IRB Approval: This study is exempt from IRB review.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
- 1.FDA Briefing Document. Paper presented at: Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) Meeting. 2016 Mar 8–9; 2016. link: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/PharmacyCompoundingAdvisoryCommittee/UCM486146.pdf.
- 2.Piette EW, Foering KP, Chang AY, et al. Impact of smoking in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Archives of dermatology. 2012;148(3):317–322. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chang AY, Piette EW, Foering KP, Tenhave TR, Okawa J, Werth VP. Response to antimalarial agents in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a prospective analysis. Archives of dermatology. 2011;147(11):1261–1267. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biro L, Leone N. Aplastic anemia induced by quinacrine. Archives of dermatology. 1965;92(5):574–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Custer RP. Aplastic anemia in soldiers treated with atabrine (quinacrine) Am J Med Sci. 1946;212(2):211–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]