Abstract
The inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction between tetrazine (Tz) and trans-cyclooctene (TCO) facilitates the efficient radiosynthesis of 225Ac-radioimmunoconjugates in a two-step method, outperforming conventional approaches based on isothiocyanate couplings
Actinium-225 (225Ac; t1/2 = 10.0 d; 5.8 MeV α) is an α-particle emitting radionuclide that sequentially decays through six dominant daughters to stable 209Bi, yielding 4 net α and 2 β-disintegrations. In light of this scheme, it has been dubbed a “nanogenerator” or “in vivo generator” of α-particles.1 The 10.0 day physical half-life of 225Ac advantageously matches the long biological half-life of immunoglobulins, making it particularly well suited for applications in radioimmunotherapy (RIT). An anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody (HuM195; Lintuzumab) radiolabelled with 225Ac was recently translated to the clinic for Phase I and II trials for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.2,3 While the initial results have been promising, the clinical potential of 225Ac-targeted alpha RIT remains limited by both a shortage of the radionuclide as well as a dearth of well-explored radiochemical protocols. High-energy proton spallation of 232Th is currently evaluated for the production of gigabecquerel level of 225Ac.4 However, with regard to the latter, the current radiolabelling procedure for the clinical production of 225Ac-labelled antibodies still relies on a two-step method that suffers from low radiochemical yields (~10 %) (Figure 1A).5 Reported by McDevitt et al. in 2002, this method relies on the radiolabelling of an isothiocyanate-bearing, C-functionalized 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) derivative at 50–60°C for 30–60 minutes in a first step.5 Subsequently, this 225Ac-DOTA-NCS conjugate is reacted with the IgG of interest at 37°C for 50–60 min (pH 8.7).5 While this approach does indeed work, the hydrolysis of the isothiocyanate moiety reduces radiochemical yields to 8–11 % depending on the IgG.5 More recently, Maguire et al. have reported a one-step method that provides radiochemical yields up to 80%.6 However, this method, requires the functionalization of the IgG with >10 DOTA chelators per construct,6 a procedure which might not be feasible with most antibodies and could drastically reduce the immunoreactivity of the radioimmunoconjugate. Clearly the development of novel, modular, and efficient strategies for 225Ac radiolabelling is an urgent unmet need.
Figure 1.
A) Schematic representation of the currently used two-step radiolabelling procedure for the clinical production of 225Ac-radioimmunoconjugates; B) Schematic representation of the proposed click-reaction radiolabelling strategy between a 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-Tz and TCO-antibody conjugate.
In 2006, Marik and Sutcliffe pioneered the application of click chemistry for the synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals, with the use of a CuI-catalysed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition for the synthesis of 18F-radiolabelled peptides.7 Catalyst free click reactions such as the strain-promoted [3+2] azide alkyne cycloaddition8,9,10 and Staudinger ligation11,12 were later used for the synthesis of radiotracers for use in small animal positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, the low rate constant of these reactions, (k ~ 10−2−1 M−1s−1 and 10−3 M−1s−1, respectively)13,14 limit their application in vivo. The remarkable selectivity and rapidity (k ~ 1–106 M−1.s−1) of the bioorthogonal inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) cycloaddition between tetrazine (Tz) and trans-cyclooctene (TCO) has most notably been leveraged for in vivo pretargeting.15 Pretargeting is a strategy for the administration of radioimmunoconjugates that relies on the separate injection of a TCO-antibody conjugate and a Tz-radioligand. This approach has been applied for both nuclear imaging and radiotherapy and has the major advantage of reducing the radiation dose to non-target tissues.15 The IEDDA reaction also holds promise for a wide variety of other applications in radiochemistry.15,16 The use of the IEDDA reaction was reported for the synthesis of 18F-radiolabelled peptides by Fox et al.,17 but also for the synthesis of radioimmunoconjugates by Zeglis et al. (64Cu and 89Zr) and Rossin et al. (111In).18,19,20 However, in these cases, this click-based radiolabelling method did not constitute a significant improvement compared to more traditional radiolabelling protocols. Here, we evaluate the application of inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) chemistry to the ex-vivo synthesis of 225Ac-labelled radioimmunoconjugates.
In the study at hand, two Tz-bearing chelators and two TCO-modified immunoconjugates were employed to evaluate the potential of the IEDDA reaction for the synthesis of 225Ac-radioimmunoconjugates (Figure 1B). More specifically, a DOTA-PEG7-Tz construct was synthesized according to previously reported protocols21, and a DO3A-PEG7-Tz ligand was prepared via a similar synthetic route (see Supporting Information). With respect to the antibodies, 5B1 is a fully human antibody that targets carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9), an antigen that is highly expressed by many cancers, most notably pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. huA33 is a humanized antibody that targets the A33 antigen, a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by >95% of colorectal carcinomas. The conjugation of TCO-NHS to 5B1 and huA33 as well as the subsequent determination of the average number of TCO moieties per antibody were performed according to previously published methods (see Supporting information).19,21
225Ac is received as a nitrate salt and reconstituted using 0.2 M Optima grade HCl solution. DOTA-PEG7-Tz (10 to 370 nmol) is radiolabelled with 225Ac (0.7 to 33.0 MBq) at 37°C in NH4OAc (0.25 mM, pH 5.5) for 1 hour. Decay-corrected radiochemical yields range from 66 ± 2% to 96 ± 2% depending on the amount of activity added per µmol of Tz-chelator (Figure 2A). After purification on a C18 light cartridge, instant thin layer chromatography (iTLC) indicates the presence of free non-equilibrium daughters at low level (<5%). At secular equilibrium, the radioligands are obtained with radiochemical purity >98% (see Supporting information) and molar activities up to 0.17 ± 0.03 MBq/µmol. The ligation of the Tz-bearing radioligands is performed by adding different molar ratios of 5B1-TCO (4:1 or 8:1 Tz-to-5B1) to the 225Ac-tetrazine complex. Not surprisingly given the speed of the click-reaction, the ligation is completed in less than 5 minutes. The 225Ac-labelled radioimmunoconjugates are purified using a PD-10 desalting column and obtained with excellent radiochemical purity (>98%) as confirmed by iTLC (see Supporting information). Specific activities for the 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-5B1 conjugates range from 2.8 ± 0.9 and 4.6 ± 0.2 MBq/mg depending on the molar ratio of Tz-to-5B1 (Figure 2B). These values are in the range of those produced using the currently clinically used two-step method (3.0–4.4 MBq/mg).5 Decay corrected radiochemical yields after purification vary from 35 ± 11 % to 45 ± 6 %. Taking into account the degree of labelling of TCO on the antibody (1.8 ± 0.4) and the molar ratio of Tz-to-5B1 used, the conjugation step is nearly quantitative. Clearly, our click-based two-step approach produces a significant improvement over the radiochemical yields obtained using the previously reported method (mAb = HuM195; radiochemical yield =10.6 ± 3.6%; P<0.05). Similar methods are applied to the radiolabelling of 5B1-TCO with the Tz-PEG7-DO3A derivative as well as for the labelling of the huA33-TCO conjugates. The results in these cases confirm the modularity of this approach and are provided in the supporting information.
Figure 2.
Two-step 225Ac-radiolabelling method based on the IEDDA reaction (A) Dependence of the radiochemical yield and specific activity on the activity added (MBq) per nmol of DOTA-PEG7-Tz; (B) Dependence of the radiochemical yield and specific activity on the Tz-to-5B1 ratio.
The stability of the 225Ac-DOTA/DO3A-PEG7-5B1 radioimmunoconjugates is determined in saline and human serum for up to 10 days. Radiochemical purity after 10 days was >70%, and the activity still bound to protein is >80%. The low activity concentrations observed in non-target organs during the in vivo evaluation experiments provide further evidence for the radiochemical stability of the radioimmunoconjugates. The in vitro immunoreactivity of the 225Ac-labelled 5B1 radioimmunoconjugates is determined to ensure that the conjugation and radiolabelling processes did not alter the affinity of the antibody for CA19.9. To this end, two human PDAC cell lines are used: BxPC3 (CA19.9 positive) and MIAPaCa-2 (CA19.9 negative). The immunoreactivity of 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-5B1 is determined to be 0.23 ± 0.01 % with MIAPaCa-2 cells and 61.3 ± 4.52 % with BxPC3 cells, confirming the selectivity of the radioimmunoconjugate for CA19.9. The immunoreactivity with BxPC3 cells is rather low but still acceptable for further in vivo evaluation. Similar results are obtained with 225Ac-DO3A-PEG7-5B1 (see Supporting Information).
Acute biodistribution experiments are performed in healthy athymic nude mice as well as athymic nude mice bearing subcutaneous BxPC3 or MIAPaCa-2 xenografts. These mice are administered either 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-5B1 or 225Ac-DO3A-PEG7-5B1 (18.5 kBq, 8.6 µmol) in 150 µL of 0.9 % NaCl + 1.0 % BSA. Then, after 4 h, 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, or 10 d, tissues of interest are harvested, and each sample is weighed and counted for up to 10 min on a gamma counter using a 150 to 600 keV energy window. In healthy animals, the biodistribution data up to 3 days post-injection reveals good clearance of the radioimmunoconjugates with decreasing activity concentrations in the blood, heart, lung and kidneys (see Supporting Information). In mice bearing BxPC3 xenografts, 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-5B1 produces high levels of prolonged tumor accumulation, with activity concentrations up to 32.4 ±9.8 % ID/g, 10 days post-injection. The specificity of the radioimmunoconjugate for CA19.9 is confirmed by the drastic reduction in the tumoral activity concentrations in the mice bearing MIAPaCa-2 xenografts (5.3 ± 2.7 %ID/g, 3 days post-injection). Good clearance of 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-5B1 is observed in this case as well, with decreasing concentrations of the radioimmunoconjugates in all other organs. This observation suggests that the radioimmunoconjugate is adequately stable in vivo since no persistent uptake is observed in the organs in which free 225Ac and its daughters typically accumulate (e.g. liver, bone and kidneys). Similar biodistribution profiles — with high tumor uptake and efficient clearance — are observed with the 225Ac-DO3A-PEG7-5B1 radioligand as well as with 225Ac-labelled variants of the huA33 antibody in mice bearing SW1222 human colorectal cancer xenografts (see Supporting Information).
In conclusion, this study positions the IEDDA ligation as an extremely promising radiosynthetic approach for the development and clinical production of 225Ac-labelled radioimmunoconjugates. The Tz/TCO-based two step radiolabelling strategy described herein offers dramatically superior radiochemical yields compared to the two step method that is currently used in the clinic. This modular approach also yields radioimmunoconjugates with suitable specific activities and good in vitro stability. Finally, the excellent biodistribution profiles of the 225Ac-labelled radioimmunoconjugates confirm the potential of this strategy. In the end, we contend that this Tz/TCO-based approach could be used in cases in which the targeting vector (e.g. antibody, protein, etc.) is unstable under the conditions necessary for the chelation of the radiometal. Two such scenarios that immediately come to mind are the creation of 227Th-labelled antibodies for radioimmunotherapy22,23 and the synthesis of 89Zr-DOTA-labelled biomolecules for PET imaging.24
Supplementary Material
Figure 3.
In vivo biodistribution of in BxPC3 (CA19.9 positive) and MIAPaCa-2 (CA19.9 negative) tumor bearing athymic nude mice of 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-Tz (18.5 kBq, 8.6 µmol, 0.06 nmol) up to 10 days post-injection. Only major organs are represented. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 5).
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe core, which is supported in part by NIH grant P30 CA08748. We gratefully acknowledge Mr. William H. and Mrs. Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and The Center for Experimental Therapeutics of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (JSL), the National Institutes of Health (R00 CA1440138, BMZ), the Thompson grant, and the fellowship from the François Wallace Monahan Fellowship from the JLM Benevolent Fund (SP). Michael McDevitt is acknowledged for generously providing part of the radioisotope used in this study. We also thank Kimberley Edwards and Dalya Abdel-Atti for technical support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
‡ All animals were treated according to the guidelines approved by the Research Animal Resource Center and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
§ The isotope used in this research was supplied by the United States Department of Energy Office of Science by the Isotope Program in the Office of Nuclear Physics.
- 1.McDevitt MR, Ma D, Lai LT, Simon J, Borchardt P, Frank RK, Wu K, Pellegrini V, Curcio MJ, Miederer M, Bander NH, Scheinberg DA. Science. 2001;294:1537. doi: 10.1126/science.1064126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jurcic JG, Rosenblat TL. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e126. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jurcic JG, Levy MY, Park JH, Ravandi F, Perl AE, Pagel JM, Smith BD, Estey EH, Kantarjian H, Cicic D, Scheinberg DA. Blood. 2016:128. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Griswold JR, Medvedev DG, Engle JW, Copping R, Fitzsimmons JM, Radchenko V, Cooley JC, Fassbender ME, Denton DL, Murphy KE, Owens AC, Birnbaum ER, John KD, Nortier FM, Stracener DW, Heilbronn LH, Mausner LF, Mirzadeh S. Appl Radiat Isot. 2016;118:366. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McDevitt MR, Ma D, Simon J, Frank RK, Scheinberg DA. Appl Radiat Isot. 2002;57:841. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maguire WF, McDevitt MR, Smith-Jones PM, Scheinberg DA. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1492. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marik J, Sutcliffe JL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:6681. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bouvet V, Wuest M, Wuest F. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:7393. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06034a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baumhover NJ, Martin ME, Parameswarappa SG, Kloepping KC, O'Dorisio MS, Pigge FC, Schultz MK. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:5757. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carpenter RD, Hausner SH, Sutcliffe JL. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2011;2:885. doi: 10.1021/ml200187j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pretze M, Wuest F, Peppel T, Kockerling M, Mamat C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:6410. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carroll L, Boldon S, Bejot R, Moore JE, Declerck J, Gouverneur V. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:136. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00564a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dommerholt J, Rutjes FPJT, van Delft FL. Top Curr Chem. 2016;374 doi: 10.1007/s41061-016-0016-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Berkel SS, van Eldijk MB, van Hest JCM. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50:8806. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Altai M, Membreno R, Cook B, Tolmachev V, Zeglis B. J Nucl Med. 2017 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.189944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer JP, Adumeau P, Lewis JS, Zeglis BM. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2791. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Selvaraj R, Liu S, Hassink M, Huang CW, Yap LP, Park R, Fox JM, Li Z, Conti PS. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:5011. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zeglis BM, Mohindra P, Weissmann GI, Divilov V, Hilderbrand SA, Weissleder R, Lewis JS. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22:2048. doi: 10.1021/bc200288d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zeglis BM, Sevak KK, Reiner T, Mohindra P, Carlin SD, Zanzonico P, Weissleder R, Lewis JS. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1389. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rossin R, Verkerk PR, van den Bosch SM, Vulders RC, Verel I, Lub J, Robillard MS. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:3375. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Houghton JL, Membreno R, Abdel-Atti D, Cunanan KM, Carlin S, Scholz WW, Zanzonico PB, Lewis JS, Zeglis BM. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:124. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dahle J, Borrebaek J, Melhus KB, Bruland OS, Salberg G, Olsen DR, Larsen RH. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33:271. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ramdahl T, Bonge-Hansen HT, Ryan OB, Larsen S, Herstad G, Sandberg M, Bjerke RM, Grant D, Brevik EM, Cuthbertson AS. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:4318. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pandya DN, Bhatt N, Yuan H, Day CS, Ehrmann BM, Wright M, Bierbach U, Wadas TJ. Chem Sci. 2017;8:2309. doi: 10.1039/c6sc04128k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.