Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Mar 8;6(10):e00081-18. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00081-18

Draft Genome Sequences of Six Vibrio diazotrophicus Strains Isolated from Deep Subsurface Sediments of the Baltic Sea

Daniel Castillo a, Verona Vandieken b, Bert Engelen b, Tim Engelhardt b, Mathias Middelboe a,
PMCID: PMC5843729  PMID: 29519824

ABSTRACT

We present here the draft genome sequences of six Vibrio diazotrophicus strains, which were isolated from deep subseafloor sediments of the Baltic Sea. The genomic sequences contained several virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. These genome sequences provide insights into the genetic composition and evolution of the genus Vibrio in marine environments.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Marine subsurface sediments cover approximately 70% of the Earth’s surface and harbor a remarkable population of microbial life that comprises 1/10 of all living biota on Earth (1). Studies of adaptation have suggested that the microbes found in the subsurface seabed represent descendants of surface communities that were buried in the past (2). Thus, subseafloor sediment provides an unprecedented opportunity to investigate genetic richness of bacterial communities on a time scale of thousands to millions of years.

Vibrio species are heterotrophic bacteria that occur naturally in diverse marine environments, including subseafloor sediments (3). Although the presence of Vibrio spp. has been determined by 16S rRNA gene library analysis in deep marine subsurface sediments (4), little is known about the whole-genome sequences of Vibrio spp. isolated from this environment. Here, we announce the draft genome sequences of six Vibrio diazotrophicus strains isolated from deep subsurface sediments (12.7 to 79.6 m below the sea floor) of the Baltic Sea.

Vibrio diazotrophicus strains 60.6B, 60.6F, 60.18M, 60.27F, 65.7M, and 65.10M were grown at 22°C in LB broth (catalog no. 12106 to 12105; Mo Bio, Inc.). Genomic DNA was extracted by using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (catalog no. A1120; Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A sequencing library was prepared using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (BGI, Hong Kong) with paired-end read sizes of 100 bp. A total of 15,092,729 to 17,078,579 paired-end reads were used for de novo assembly in Geneious version 9.1.6 (5). Short and low-coverage contigs were filtered out, resulting in a set from 37 to 77, with an average coverage of 99× (average N50 value, 137,585 bp). Annotation was performed with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (6). Additionally, the genomes were analyzed on the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (7). Antibiotic resistance genes were identified using ResFinder version 2.1 (8), virulence factors were identified using VirulenceFinder version 1.2 (9), and prophage-related sequences were identified using PHASTER (10).

The final assemblies for the six Vibrio diazotrophicus strains had total lengths from 4,543,538 to 4,824,458 bp and an average G+C content of 43.4%. Genome annotations resulted in between 4,122 to 4,421 coding sequences (CDSs), 56 to 67 tRNAs, and 3 to 5 rRNAs for all strains. Three zot-encoding prophages of 6.9, 9.1, and 12.5 kb were detected for strains 60.6B, 60.27F, and 60.18M, respectively. Interestingly, strain 60.6B contained the virulence-related genes toxR and toxS, which were described previously in V. cholerae (11). Genes associated with resistance to the antibiotic fluoroquinolone (parC, parE, gyrA, and gyrB) were found for all strains except 60.27M. Tetracycline resistance genes (BLc and BLII) were only found in strains 60.27F and 65.10M. Also, all strains harbored the eight genes (R1, DedA, R3, R4, R5, DedD, R8, and PurF) related to colicin V production. Thus, these genome sequences can facilitate understanding of the genetic diversity within the genus Vibrio in one of the largest ecosystems on Earth, the deep marine biosphere.

Accession number(s).

Genomes were deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The assembly versions described in this paper are the first versions of the assemblies.

TABLE 1.

Summary report of the de novo assembly of the six Vibrio diazotrophicus strains from this study

Strain No. of
contigs
N50 value Assembly
length (bp)
G+C
content (%)
Coverage
(×)
No. of
CDSsa
No. of
tRNAs
Accession no.
65.7M 54 196,201 4,606,601 43.4 98 4,159 66 POSL00000000
65.10M 77 114,453 4,824,458 43.5 91 4,421 67 POSM00000000
60.27F 42 254,877 4,691,444 43.5 107 4,267 67 POSK00000000
60.18M 40 193,656 4,544,576 43.3 100 4,085 56 POSJ00000000
60.6F 49 180,451 4,747,742 43.5 98 4,300 66 POSI00000000
60.6B 37 206,116 4,543,538 43.7 110 4,122 65 POSH00000000
a

CDSs, coding sequences.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research used samples provided by the IODP. We thank the cochiefs of IODP Expedition 347, Bo Barker Jørgensen and Thomas Andrén, and the scientific party, including the crew of the Greatship Manisha and Carol Cotterill, for providing samples from the cruise. We thank Jana Schmidt, Frank Meyerjürgens, and Oscar Chiang for support in the laboratory.

This work was supported by grants from the Danish Directorate for Food, Fisheries and Agri Business (ProAqua, project 09-072829) and the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) (project 7014-00080).

Footnotes

Citation Castillo D, Vandieken V, Engelen B, Engelhardt T, Middelboe M. 2018. Draft genome sequences of six Vibrio diazotrophicus strains isolated from deep subsurface sediments of the Baltic Sea. Genome Announc 6:e00081-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00081-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kallmeyer J, Pockalny R, Adhikari RR, Smith DC, D’Hondt S. 2012. Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16213–16216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203849109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Starnawski P, Bataillon T, Ettema TJ, Jochum LM, Schreiber L, Chen X, Lever MA, Polz MF, Jørgensen BB, Schramm A, Kjeldsen KU. 2017. Microbial community assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:2940–2945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614190114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Batzke A, Engelen B, Sass H, Cypionka H. 2007. Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of cultured deep-biosphere bacteria from equatorial Pacific Ocean and Peru margin sediments. Geomicrobiol J 24:261–273. doi: 10.1080/01490450701456453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.D'Hondt S, Jørgensen BB, Miller DJ, Batzke A, Blake R, Cragg BA, Cypionka H, Dickens GR, Ferdelman T, Hinrichs KU, Holm NG, Mitterer R, Spivack A, Wang G, Bekins B, Engelen B, Ford K, Gettemy G, Rutherford SD, Sass H, Skilbeck CG, Aiello IW, Guèrin G, House CH, Inagaki F, Meister P, Naehr T, Niitsuma S, Parkes RJ, Schippers A, Smith DC, Teske A, Wiegel J, Padilla CN, Acosta JL. 2004. Distributions of microbial activities in deep subseafloor sediments. Science 306:2216–2221. doi: 10.1126/science.1101155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arndt D, Grant J, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DiRita VJ. 1995. Three-component regulatory system controlling virulence in Vibrio cholerae, p 351–365. In Hoch J, Silhavy T. (ed), Two-component signal transduction, 1st ed American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1128/9781555818319.ch22. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES