Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;5(1):ENEURO.0315-17.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0315-17.2018

Table 4.

Results of the model comparison of the 2 × 2 dynamic causal models in which visual reliability (VR) modulated the connection from V1-3 to IPS0–4 and modality-specific report (MR) modulated the connection from PFC to IPS0–4

Factor Modulation VR and MR Modulation VR Modulation MR No modulation
Model evidence (FFX) 0 –52.947 –54.033 –90.45
Posterior p (FFX) 1 0 0 0
Expected posterior p (RFX) 0.587 0.136 0.139 0.139
Exceedance p (RFX) 0.902 0.032 0.033 0.033
Protected exceedance p (RFX) 0.699 0.1 0.101 0.101

FFX, fixed-effects analysis; RFX, random-effects analysis; model evidence corresponds to free energy (relative to full model) summed over participants (i.e., larger is better); expected posterior p, probability that a given model generated the data for a randomly selected subject; exceedance p, probability that a given model is more likely than any other model; protected exceedance p, probability that one model is more likely than any other model beyond chance.