ABSTRACT
Diplonemids represent a hyperdiverse and abundant yet poorly studied group of marine protists. Here we describe two new members of the genus Diplonema (Diplonemea, Euglenozoa), Diplonema japonicum sp. nov. and Diplonema aggregatum sp. nov., based on life cycle, morphology, and 18S rRNA gene sequences. Along with euglenozoan apomorphies, they contain several unique features. Their life cycle is complex, consisting of a trophic stage that is, following the depletion of nutrients, transformed into a sessile stage and subsequently into a swimming stage. The latter two stages are characterized by the presence of tubular extrusomes and the emergence of a paraflagellar rod, the supportive structure of the flagellum, which is prominently lacking in the trophic stage. These two stages also differ dramatically in motility and flagellar size. Both diplonemid species host endosymbiotic bacteria that are closely related to each other and constitute a novel branch within Holosporales, for which a new genus, “Candidatus Cytomitobacter” gen. nov., has been established. Remarkably, the number of endosymbionts in the cytoplasm varies significantly, as does their localization within the cell, where they seem to penetrate the mitochondrion, a rare occurrence.
KEYWORDS: Holosporales, diplonemid, endosymbionts, life cycle, ultrastructure
IMPORTANCE
We describe the morphology, behavior, and life cycle of two new Diplonema species that established a relationship with two Holospora-like bacteria in the first report of an endosymbiosis in diplonemids. Both endosymbionts reside in the cytoplasm and the mitochondrion, which establishes an extremely rare case. Within their life cycle, the diplonemids undergo transformation from a trophic to a sessile and eventually a highly motile swimming stage. These stages differ in several features, such as the presence or absence of tubular extrusomes and a paraflagellar rod, along with the length of the flagella. These morphological and behavioral interstage differences possibly reflect distinct functions in dispersion and invasion of the host and/or prey and may provide novel insight into the virtually unknown function of diplonemids in the oceanic ecosystem.
INTRODUCTION
Diplonemids constitute a monophyletic group of predominantly deep-sea protists within the phylum Euglenozoa (1) that was recently subdivided into four lineages: the classic diplonemid clade or Diplonemidae, the Hemistasiidae clade, and deep-see pelagic diplonemid (DSPD) clades I and II (2, 3). With over 45,000 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), diplonemids have been recently characterized as the most species-rich group of marine planktonic eukaryotes (2, 4, 5). Despite their enormous diversity and abundance in the ocean, they remain one of the most poorly studied groups of protists. Indeed, a century after the first report on diplonemids was published (6), there are only nine species for which both sequence data and comprehensive morphological description are available (7). Most representatives of the DSPD I clade, which accounts for 97% of all diplonemid diversity (2), are known only as region V9 of the 18S rRNA gene, although the first information about their morphology and genome has been recently reported (3, 8).
To fill this gap in our knowledge, we launched a project in which diplonemids were screened in coastal surface and deep-sea waters around Japan. We obtained two isolates that fall within the classic diplonemid clade and represent new species. Until recently, the Diplonemidae clade consisted of only two genera, Diplonema and Rhynchopus, whereas Hemistasiidae contained a single species, Hemistasia phaeocysticola. On the basis of 18S rRNA phylogeny, the genus Diplonema is currently composed of two described species, D. ambulator (9, 10) and D. papillatum (11, 12), not yet formally described Diplonema sp. strains ATCC 50225 and ATCC 50232, and a number of environmental sequences unavailable in culture (7). Traditionally, diplonemids that possess a nonflagellated stage within their life cycle were classified into the genus Rhynchopus, whereas all those with permanently protruding flagella were considered members of the genus Diplonema (13, 14).
In this work, we also describe the first case of bacterial endosymbiosis in diplonemids. Endosymbiotic relationships have evolved multiple times independently in a number of unrelated groups of protists (15, 16). By far the most frequently reported protist taxa involved in symbiotic relationships with bacteria are aerobic ciliates and amoebas (15, 17–20), while their anaerobic counterparts establish symbioses with both archaea and bacteria (21–23). Reports on endosymbioses in Euglenozoa are rather scarce, although several cases have been described in three major groups, namely, kinetoplastids (24–26), euglenids (27–29), and possibly symbiontids (30). Diplonemids prominently remained the only group within Euglenozoa with no record of endosymbiotic bacteria. Here we report the presence of Holospora-like symbionts that reside within the novel isolates and display a unique interaction with the host cell as they occupy both the cytoplasm and the mitochondrion.
RESULTS
Molecular phylogenetic position of diplonemids.
Both maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses of an 18S rRNA gene data set with exhaustive sampling of Diplonemidae confirmed the placement of the newly described species within the Diplonema clade. Representatives of this genus are split into two lineages; one consists of D. papillatum, Diplonema sp. strain ATCC 50232, and three uncultured diplonemids, while the second, well-supported, clade contains D. ambulator, Diplonema sp. strain ATCC 50255, Diplonema aggregatum sp. nov., and Diplonema japonicum sp. nov. (see below), the most basal member of this group. The 18S rRNA genes of the two species (accession no. MF422190 and MF422192) differ from each other by 93 nucleotides, which translates into 95.5% sequence identity. Both phylogenetic position and sequence divergence qualify them as new diplonemid species (Fig. 1).
Light microscopy and cell cycle.
Isolates YPF1603 and YPF1604 (holotype) are named Diplonema japonicum sp. nov. here.
Trophic cells in well-growing cultures are cylindrical, elongated, and tapered posteriorly, with a wide anterior half that is slightly constricted and bent at the cell apex (Fig. 2A). Less commonly, trophic cells have a nearly symmetrical elongated shape with both ends rounded (Fig. 2B). The cells measure 15.3 to 22.9 (mean ± SD [standard deviation of mean], 19.9 ± 1.9 [n = 25]) μm in length and 4.5 to 7.0 (5.8 ± 0.6) μm in width. Two thin, equally long flagella, about one-third of the cell body in length, are parallel and inserted subapically into a pronounced flagellar pocket (Fig. 2B and F). In fresh cultures, cells mostly glide at the bottom of the culture flasks flexing their flagella, which gives an impression of ambulation; they may also be observed rotating around their anterior part by attaching to the surface via a single flagellum. The gliding cells often drastically change their shape because of metabolic contortions such as contraction-expansion, extension, writhing, and twisting. Numerous refractive vacuoles are spread throughout the cytoplasm, being absent only from the anterior part (Fig. 2A and B). The J-shaped ingestion apparatus, well visible under transmitted light, runs parallel to the longitudinal axis of the cell (Fig. 2B and F).
Within a few hours after placement in starvation medium, virtually all cells round up and attach firmly to the bottom of the culture flask (Fig. 2C and D). Closer examination reveals that they are not round but folded up and enclosed in a translucent mucilaginous coat through which they appear to attach to the surface. The sessile cells are solitary, measure 6.5 to 8.5 μm in diameter, turn slowly within the mucilaginous envelope, and produce long flagella that wrap around the anterior end (Fig. 2C and D). Upon further extension of starvation by 24 h, the fully flagellated stage begins to detach from the bottom of the flask. It is 10.3 to 12.7 (12.7 ± 1.0 [n = 10]) μm long and 4.0 to 5.2 (4.6 ± 0.4) μm wide and oval or tapered posteriorly and generally lacks refractive vacuoles (Fig. 2F). Swimming is mediated by two thick, unequal flagella usually at least twice as long as the cell (Fig. 2F). The posterior flagellum is loosely twisted around the cell and stretches behind it, while the anterior flagellum forms a tight loop around the anterior half (Fig. 2E). The swimming cells are fast and move in a straight line continuously rotating around their longitudinal axis. Metabolic movements are also typical for this stage, especially when cells are immobilized under a coverslip. The actively swimming phase is transient, usually lasting less than 12 h. Further starvation leads to miniaturization of the cells and flagellar disassembly, accompanied by pronounced swelling of the flagellar tips (Fig. 2G). During this terminal stage of starvation, cells are incapable of movement; possess very short, thin flagella; and reduce their body size to 7.0 by 3.5 μm (Fig. 2H). Eventually, within several days of starvation, the cells undergo lysis. However, if placed in fresh medium, they readily revert to the trophic stage. While the starved cells pass transitions between phases nearly synchronously, old batch cultures exhibit a mixture of trophic, sessile, fast-swimming, and miniaturized cells.
Isolates YPF1605 and YPF1606 (holotype) are named Diplonema aggregatum sp. nov. here.
Notably elongated, flattened trophic cells with acute anterior and round posterior ends constitute the predominant morphotype in fresh culture (Fig. 3A), although slightly C-shaped (Fig. 3B) or S-shaped (Fig. 3C) cells are also frequently seen. The characteristic apical papilla and ingestion apparatus are well visible by light microscopy (Fig. 3B), as are large refractive vesicles in the posterior half. The cell length ranges from 17.6 to 24.7 (21.6 ± 1.9 [n = 25]) μm, and the width is between 4.3 and 6.2 (5.2 ± 0.54) μm. Two parallel-oriented and unequally long, thin flagella emerge from a deep subapical flagellar pocket (Fig. 3B and C). The longer flagellum measures approximately half of the body length and is often twice as long as the shorter flagellum (Fig. 3A). The cells move by gliding, which is accompanied by slow ambulation by flexing of both flagella. Contracting-extending and twisting metabolic movements are frequent among the gliding trophic cells.
In old batch cultures, the cells round up, cluster, and attach firmly to the flask bottom to form extensive, often macroscopic aggregates. However, such sessile cells are never produced by starvation of the trophic cells in seawater. Rounded cells are 6.5 to 8.5 μm in diameter and embedded in a conspicuous amount of a mucilaginous substance that glues neighboring cells together and attaches them to the flask (Fig. 3D and E). Like those of D. japonicum, sessile cells remain active and synthesize long, thick flagella coiling around themselves (Fig. 3D and F). The transition from the sessile stage to free-swimming flagellates does not occur following prolonged starvation in either old culture medium or seawater. The release of swimming stages requires incubation of the sessile cells in seawater, followed by the addition of a small portion of LB agar. The mucilaginous envelopes produced by the sessile stage persist upon the emergence of trophic or swimming cells (Fig. 3G). While the morphology and behavior of the swimming stage of D. aggregatum are indistinguishable from those of D. japonicum (Fig. 3G and H), this phase is much shorter in the former, lasting only a couple of hours. Upon the release of nutrients from the LB agar, the cells revert to the trophic stage. When placed in seawater, swimming cells quickly reduce the size and length of their flagella to produce miniaturized trophic cells, which are incapable of movement and lack cytoplasmic refractive inclusions (data not shown).
Morphology and localization of bacterial endosymbionts.
Bacterial cells were periodically seen in axenic cultures of D. japonicum and D. aggregatum following lysis of the protists. Hybridization with the EUB338 probe, which targets most bacterial groups, revealed numerous rod-shaped cells scattered throughout the host cytoplasm (Fig. 4A and 5A). The signal was never detected in nuclei or extracellularly. All trophic cells of both diplonemids were positive, with the number of bacteria ranging from <10 (Fig. 4A and 5A) to >100 (Fig. 4B and 5B) per host cell.
The endosymbionts in both species are short rods 1.0 to 1.4 μm long and 0.5 to 0.6 μm thick. All sessile and swimming D. japonicum cells contain cytoplasmic bacteria, although often at lower counts (Fig. 4C). In contrast, sessile and swimming D. aggregatum cells usually bear very few bacteria per cell, often arranged in small clusters or lacking any bacteria at all (Fig. 5C). Following 2 weeks of starvation, not only does the number of endosymbionts drop, but the fluorescence intensity produced by the EUB338 probe is reduced, possibly reflecting a decrease in the number of ribosomes in bacteria within the starved host (data not shown). The morphology of the endosymbionts remains unaltered throughout the host cell cycle, with no signs of differentiation into long infectious forms, which are common in Holospora-like bacteria (31). Antibiotic treatment proved unsuccessful at removing endosymbionts; however, incubation with kanamycin transiently reduced the number of bacteria to 10 per D. aggregatum cell (data not shown).
Fluorescence staining of organelles.
Multiple attempts to label the mitochondrion with specific membrane potential-based probes and immunofluorescence failed in all diplonemid stages. However, we were able to visualize the single reticulated mitochondrion by staining its DNA, which is, as in the case of D. papillatum (32), extremely abundant and distributed uniformly throughout the organelle. Bacterial nucleoids are brightly stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and precisely follow the pattern of the EUB338 probe fluorescence (Fig. 4A and B and 5A and B). In contrast, in both diplonemids, the mitochondrial DNA is stained very poorly with DAPI, which is likely a reflection of its unusually high GC content (33). However, the SYTO24 probe yields very strong fluorescence of the host DNA, both nuclear and mitochondrial, whereas the bacterial nucleoids remain virtually unstained, as SYTO24 fluorescence does not overlap the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signal (Fig. 4C and 5C). The SYTO24 staining suggests that, in both species, the single mitochondrion is a flat, reticulated structure located beneath the cell surface (Fig. 4D and 5D). In some trophic and swimming cells, the mitochondrial DNA seems to be organized into multiple discrete foci (Fig. 4D and 5D). In both species, the nucleus is usually located in the anterior half of the cell, adjacent to the turn of the J-shaped ingestion apparatus (Fig. 4A and B and 5A and B).
Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of endosymbionts.
Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA genes of the endosymbionts isolated from D. japonicum and D. aggregatum confirmed their alphaproteobacterial origin (accession no. MG719947 and MG719948). Both sequences are part of the Holosporaceae clade (class Alphaproteobacteria, order Holosporales, family Holosporaceae), which contains bacterial symbionts of ciliates and other protists, such as amoebas, ciliates, and rhizarians. Together with sequences obtained from an aspen rhizosphere (EF019091) and a flea of vertebrates Oropsylla hirsuta (EU137604), the endosymbionts of diplonemids form a well-separated clade, sister to all currently recognized candidate holosporaceans, namely, Holospora, Paraholospora, and Gortzia spp. For this novel lineage of bacterial endosymbionts, we have established a new genus, “Candidatus Cytomitobacter” (Fig. 6), to accommodate “Ca. Cytomitobacter primus” sp. nov. (D. japonicum) and “Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum” sp. nov. (D. aggregatum).
The observed branching order has a rather low level of support, probably reflecting a general trend of increased rates of evolution typically seen in symbiotic bacteria, which consequently causes problems with their phylogenetic reconstruction. Both of the diplonemid symbionts described here differ in their partial 16S rRNA sequences by 41 nucleotides, which translates into 96% sequence identity. Their distance from other members of the family Holosporaceae is, on average, 158 nucleotides in the same gene (85% sequence identity). A sister group of Holosporales is the so-called C/N clade, consisting of Caedibacter and “Ca. Nucleicultrix,” followed by a large assemblage of members of the family “Ca. Paracaedibacteraceae,” which is in agreement with current understanding of evolution of symbiotic alphaproteobacteria in protists (34, 35).
Infection experiments.
Since some Holospora-like bacteria are capable of horizontal transmission from one taxonomically related host to another (17), several infection experiments have been performed with the bacteria isolated from diplonemids. However, none of the methods employed to infect several endosymbiont-free diplonemid species were successful. The endosymbionts were incapable of growing in the liquid and agar media tested (data not shown).
Fine structure.
The trophic cells of D. japonicum and D. aggregatum are smooth with separate feeding and flagellar apparatuses joined by an apical papilla at the anterior end (Fig. 7A and B and 8A and B). The opening to the cytopharynx is represented by a pronounced collar-like cytostome slightly protruding above the cell surface (Fig. 7A and B and 8A and B). When entering the sessile stage, both diplonemids acquire a globular shape with their flagella firmly wrapped around them (Fig. 9A to D). In addition, they become enveloped by an amorphous coat of uniform thickness that seems to help the cells stick to each other (Fig. 9D and E).
The fine structures of the two species are similar (Fig. 7C and D and 8C and D). The cell membrane is supported by a tight corset of cytoskeletal microtubules that enfold the cell longitudinally following an S-helix path (Fig. 7A, B, and E; Fig. 8E; and Fig. 11). The cytoskeletal microtubules are absent from the region of flagellar attachment (Fig. 7J and 8N). Adjacent to them extends a peripheral mitochondrial network that is seen as multiple narrow tubular structures in longitudinal sections (Fig. 7C, D, and G and 8C to F; also see Fig. 11). The only discernible structures in the lumen of the organelle are numerous patches of electron-dense DNA and few large lamellar cristae with a longitudinal orientation (Fig. 8F and 10A1 to A3). Occasionally, individual mitochondrial branches were observed to form complex circling profiles (Fig. 10A1 to A3). Just below and parallel to the mitochondrion, a thin tubular network of endoplasmic reticulum is extended (Fig. 7C and D; 8C to E; and 11), which also tends to be frequently located around the pharynx (Fig. 7D, H, and I and 8D, I, and J). Cells bear a large vesicular nucleus, usually spherical or ellipsoidal, that is situated in the anterior third of the cell (Fig. 7C and D, 8C and D, and 11). It contains one conspicuous nucleolus placed either centrally or eccentrically and a condensed heterochromatin distributed at the periphery (Fig. 7C and D; 8C and D; 9B, D, and E; and 11). Close to the nucleus lies the Golgi complex, which often consists of several distinct bodies, each consisting of 6 to 13 and 4 to 11 prominent, stacked, flat cisternae in D. japonicum and D. aggregatum, respectively (Fig. 7C, D, and G; 8G, 9B and E; and 11). The posterior part of the cell is filled with various vacuoles with different contents and phagolysosome-like bodies (Fig. 7C and D, 8C and D, and 11). The cytoplasm is packed with free ribosomes, small refractive granules, vesicular inclusions, and microbodies.
A number of rod-shaped intracytoplasmic bacteria are randomly distributed throughout the cell (Fig. 7C and G, 8C and D, and 11). They possess a homogeneously dense granular interior enveloped by single and double membranes with a periplasmic space in between (Fig. 7F and 8H). These bacteria invariably showed no signs of lysis or degradation. They prefer to be localized adjacent to the mitochondrion and were occasionally seen wrapped by the organelle or even establishing themselves within it (Fig. 7C and 11). We were able to reconstruct a series of steps presumably leading to the internalization of the endosymbiont in the mitochondrial lumen (Fig. 10B1 to B6). The interaction seems to be initiated by either penetration of the endosymbiont into the mitochondrion, or active encirclement by the latter (Fig. 10B1 to B6).
In both diplonemids, the feeding apparatus is oriented longitudinally within the cell. It opens with a cytostome that leads into a deep, hornlike, tubular cytopharynx and terminates at the level of the nucleus (Fig. 7D and G, 8D and J, and 11). The cytopharynx is represented by an integrated system of five membranous folds, called vanes or ribs, that originate from the rods made of clusters of microtubules and fibrous material (Fig. 7H and I and 8D and I). This arrangement is structurally supported by a row of longitudinally and transversely oriented microtubules that run on the opposite side (Fig. 7H and 8I). While descending into the cell, the cytopharynx becomes gradually thinner, so that the microtubule row is drawing together with the rods (Fig. 7G and I and 8D and J). The proximal end of the feeding apparatus is often associated with membrane-bounded vesicles (Fig. 7I and 8D). In the cytostomal region, the row of microtubules that lines the cytopharynx occurs in close proximity to the cytoskeletal microtubules, as well as to a complex of reinforcing microtubules (MTR) (Fig. 7H and 8I). A band of MTR originates from a J-like extension underneath the flagellar pocket and stretches along it before reaching the cytostome (Fig. 7L, 8M, and 11). At the cell’s apex, several reinforcing microtubules arch, forming an apical papilla that becomes surrounded by a dense matrix and eventually develops into the cytopharyngeal vanes (Fig. 8K and 11).
Two flagella emanate from parallel basal bodies located at the bottom of a deep flagellar pocket (Fig. 7J and 8N). The basal bodies comprise typical centrioles assembled by nine microtubular triplets (Fig. 8M) and are associated with three asymmetrically arranged microtubular roots (Fig. 7J and 8J and N). One of them is intermediate, while the other two are lateral (also called ventral and dorsal), projecting on the sides of the basal bodies (Fig. 7J and 8N). The axonemes of both flagella are composed of nine outer microtubular doublets and a central pair originating at the distal transitional plate (Fig. 7J and K and 8L and N). Both flagella of trophic cells lack the paraflagellar rod (Fig. 7J and K and 8L and N), while this lattice-like structure is prominently present in flagella of the sessile cells (Fig. 9D, F, and G). The paraflagellar rod joins the axoneme already within the flagellar pocket and spreads along the length of it almost to the tip of the flagellum (Fig. 9G). The apical part of the cell, including the flagellar pocket and both flagella, is covered with a glycocalyx and a hair coat, which appear denser in D. aggregatum (Fig. 7K, 8J to L, and 9F and G).
Another distinctive trait of the sessile cells is the presence of tubular extrusomes (Fig. 9B, D, H, and I). They mostly occupy the anterior part of the cell on the side of the flagellar pocket (Fig. 9B, D, and H), though sometimes they may also be irregularly distributed in the posterior part (Fig. 9B). The extrusomes are often arranged in a battery where they are oriented parallel to each other (Fig. 9B and H). These extrusive organelles represent cylinders furnished with cruciate centers that are surrounded by a thick membrane (Fig. 9I).
Taxonomic summary. (i) Diplonemid hosts.
Phylum Euglenozoa Cavalier-Smith 1981, emend. Simpson 1997; class Diplonemea Cavalier-Smith 1993, emend. Simpson 1997; genus Diplonema Griessmann 1913.
Diplonema japonicum sp. nov. Tashyreva, Prokopchuk, and Lukeš (2018) (a) Description.
Species identified by 18S rRNA phylogenetic position. Trophic cells cylindrical, elongated, tapered posteriorly, wide anterior half slightly constricted and bent at cell apex; some with both ends rounded; 15.3 to 22.9 (19.9 ± 1.9) μm long and 4.5 to 7.0 (5.8 ± 0.6) μm wide; numerous refractive vacuoles missing from anterior quarter; flagella equal or subequal third of body length, subapical, regular axonemes, lacking the paraflagellar rod; gliding movement, pronounced metabolic contortions. Starvation-induced sessile stage round, solitary, 6.5 to 8.5 μm in diameter, embedded in mucilaginous coat; long flagella wrapping around anterior end; paraflagellar rods; and tubular extrusomes. Swimming stage emerging from sessile, 10.3 to 12.7 (12.7 ± 1.0) μm long and 4.0 to 5.2 (4.6 ± 0.4) μm wide, oval or tapered posteriorly, lacking refractive vacuoles; swimming fast; unequal flagella twice body length; posterior flagellum stretched; anterior flagellum loops around cell apex, paraflagellar rods, and tubular extrusomes; converted to miniaturized cells measuring 7.0 by 3.5 μm after prolonged starvation. Single reticulated mitochondrion; nucleus anterior.
(b) Etymology.
Species name is defined by the origin of the isolate.
Diplonema aggregatum sp. nov. Tashyreva, Prokopchuk, and Lukeš (2018) (a) Description.
Trophic cells notably elongated, flattened, acute anterior and round posterior ends, slightly bent into C- or S-shaped cells also observed; large refractive vesicles in posterior half; 17.6 to 24.7 (21.6 ± 1.9 [n = 25]) μm long and 4.3 and 6.2 (5.2 ± 0.54) μm wide; two parallel unequally long flagella half of body length, regular axonemes, no paraflagellar rod; gliding on surfaces and metabolic movements. In old batch cultures, sessile cells round, 6.5 to 8.5 μm in diameter, clustered in big aggregates, embedded in mucilaginous substance, long thick flagella around cell apex, a paraflagellar rod, and tubular extrusomes. Swimming stage same as that of Diplonema japonicum, released by minor addition of nutrients. Single reticulated mitochondrion; nucleus anterior.
(b) Etymology.
The species name denotes massive aggregation of cells in the sessile stage.
Type locality.
The type locality of both species is the Enoshima Aquarium, Kanagawa, Japan.
Type material.
Hapanthotypes are OsO4-fixed slides and ethanol-fixed cells deposited at the protistological collection of the Institute of Parasitology, Biology Center, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, no. IPCAS Prot 42 (D. japonicum) and 43 (D. aggregatum).
(ii) Endosymbionts.
Class Alphaproteobacteria Garrity et al. 2006; subclass Caulobacteridae Ferla et al., 2013; order Holosporales Szokoli et al., 2016; family Holosporaceae Görtz & Schmidt, 2005.
Genus “Ca. Cytomitobacter” gen. nov. Tashyreva, Prokopchuk, and Lukeš (2018).
Genus of endosymbiotic bacteria distinguished from similar genera by molecular phylogenetic analyses. Straight, rod-shaped bacteria 1.0 to 1.4 μm long and 0.5 to 0.6 μm thick, no visible inclusions, spores not observed, Gram-negative cell wall organization. Reside freely in the cytoplasm and occasionally in mitochondria, not surrounded by additional host membranes. Name is derived from the host cell compartments that representatives of the genus inhabit.
“Ca. Cytomitobacter primus” sp. nov. Tashyreva, Prokopchuk, and Lukeš (2018).
Species identified by its unique phylogenetic position on 16S rRNA gene tree. Type host Diplonema japonicum. Name (primus) denotes it as first described species of the genus.
“Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum” sp. nov. Tashyreva, Prokopchuk, and Lukeš (2018).
Species identified by its unique phylogenetic position on 16S rRNA gene tree. Type host Diplonema aggregatum. Name (indipagum) represents abbreviation of the phrase “in Diplonema aggregatum.”
DISCUSSION
Phylogeny of diplonemids.
The novel diplonemid species described here are robustly placed within the family Diplonemidae close to D. ambulator, thus clearly belonging to the genus Diplonema. The low support for the whole Diplonema clade, as well as the relatively short branch separating it from the Rhynchopus lineage, indicates the lack of molecular synapomorphies defining the current concept of the genus Diplonema and the limits of resolution provided by the 18S rRNA gene. Further detailed comparative study, including phylogenomics along with ultrastructural and life cycle data, will hopefully shed more light on the status of this genus. All euglenozoan apomorphies, such as the tripartite flagellar root complex, the lattice-like paraflagellar rod, and the thick-walled tubular extrusomes (14, 36), are present in both newly described Diplonema species. Moreover, they share a set of morphological traits with other diplonemids, such as a prominent apical papilla, a tubular ingestion apparatus contiguous to a deep flagellar pocket, two parallel flagella, metaboly, and a tightly packed microtubular corset (7).
All of the diplonemids studied so far have a relatively uniform ultrastructural organization (11, 37), with the distinguishing features, such as size and number of vacuoles, presence of extrusomes and a paraflagellar rod, length of flagella, body shape and size, and the character of movement, being subject to alteration and variability under different conditions and/or in different life cycle stages (7, 14, 38; this work). Moreover, distantly related species may exhibit similar morphology, as in the case of Flectonema neradi, which closely resembles representatives of the D. ambulator clade and was originally deposited in the American Type Culture Collection as Diplonema sp. yet is rather distantly related to it according to the 18S rRNA-based phylogeny (7) (Fig. 1). Therefore, the establishment of the new taxa presented here is based primarily on their unique 18S rRNA gene sequences, although their morphology is sufficiently different from that of other Diplonema species for which only morphological data are available (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Some unique characteristics of D. aggregatum and D. japonicum are worth further attention, as so far they have not been described in this group of protists. Both species form a morphologically distinct trophic stage in the nutrient-rich environment and a sessile stage when nutrients are limited in which long paraflagellar rod-bearing flagella and extrusomes are produced, and finally, a highly motile swimming stage is released upon further starvation or addition of small amount of nutrients. We know close to nothing about the ecologic roles of diplonemids in the ocean, yet the observed morphological alterations may point to (significantly) different strategies of individual stages in the life cycle. Specifically, the trophic stage may possibly be maintained inside the host or prey and, upon death or the exhaustion of nutrients, undergo transformation via the sessile stage into the swimming stage, which seems to be well equipped for dissemination and active searching for a host or prey. Although the role of tubular extrusomes has not yet been investigated, we hypothesize that they may play a role in the invasion process. The presence of batteries of tubular extrusomes in the apical part of H. phaeocysticola, the only diplonemid for which active predation has been described so far (39), supports this notion.
D. aggregatum and D. japonicum are the first members of the genus Diplonema in which a swimming stage was described (Table S1). Remarkably, cells in the trophic stage bear thin flagella with a regular axoneme arrangement lacking the paraflagellar rod, while this prominent structure supports flagella of the swimming stage. So far, all of the other ultrastructurally studied members of the genus Diplonema, namely, D. nigricans (40), D. ambulator (37), and D. papillatum (11), lack the paraflagellar rod in their trophic stage, and the same applies to Rhynchopus spp. (7, 13, 41). However, unlike the Diplonema species, members of the genus Rhynchopus carry only flagellar stubs with largely disordered axonemes that are concealed inside their flagellar pockets (14), while all of the remaining diplonemid genera, namely, Flectonema, Lacrimella, and Sulcionema, bear this prominent flagellar structure in their trophic stage (7). Therefore, we suggest that the absence of the paraflagellar rod in both flagella in the trophic stage and its emergence in the swimming stage may provisionally serve as an apomorphy for the genus Diplonema.
Our finding that in D. japonicum and D. aggregatum, the trophic stage lacks the paraflagellar rod while the swimming stage builds it is significant. While this well-known feature of the euglenozoan flagellum can be greatly reduced in some kinetoplastid flagellates (42), it is considered to be a canonical organelle, at least in kinetoplastids (43). At this point, we cannot exclude the possibility that the paraflagellar rod, which is composed of dozens of specialized proteins (43), is suppressed yet still present in the trophic stage. However, the observed interstage difference in the cross-sectioned flagellum of both diplonemid species is unprecedented and worth further investigation, as it implies that distinct stages of one species may build a dramatically different flagellum. Since D. papillatum was recently turned into a genetically tractable organism (44) and since different stages can be obtained in culture, the observed differences in flagellar structure can be studied by methods of functional genomics.
Phylogeny of endosymbionts and their interaction with diplonemid hosts.
Phylogenetic analyses revealed that both new bacteria are members of family Holosporaceae, which mostly contains other endosymbionts of protists. The host repertoire of this alphaproteobacterial clade, so far containing ciliates, amoebas, and rhizarians, is now expanded to accommodate the endosymbionts of euglenozoans described here. The position of “Ca. Cytomitobacter primus” and “Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum” within the order Holosporales, investigated by maximum-likelihood analysis (under the standard gamma-corrected GTR model) and the empirical admixture model (GTR+CAT40) employed in Bayesian inference analysis, is not robustly supported, and both endosymbionts stand out from the core representatives of Holosporaceae because of their highly divergent 16S rRNA sequence. While the observed topology may be an artifact caused by heterotachy, we tried to overcome the high evolutionary rates and consequent problems with phylogenetic reconstruction by using robust admixture CAT models. We therefore believe that the observed topology reflects the true state and the candidate bacterial species “Ca. Cytomitobacter primus” and “Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum” form a new genus within the family Holosporaceae.
D. japonicum and D. aggregatum are closely related, and the same holds true also for “Ca. Cytomitobacter primus” and “Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum” (Fig. 1 and 6). In fact, sequences of the endosymbionts are more similar to each other than those of their diplonemid hosts are to each other. Although this difference is only minor, it is in contrast to the commonly accepted scenario of accelerated evolutionary rates in organisms with the parasitic and/or symbiotic lifestyle (45, 46). This discrepancy brings us to the question of the origin of bacterial endosymbiosis in diplonemids. The most parsimonious explanation of the observed relationships is cospeciation of diplonemid hosts and their bacteria. If this is true, the phylogeny of the hosts would be mirrored by the phylogeny of their endosymbionts. However, while both bacterial sequences are monophyletic, this is not the case for the corresponding diplonemid hosts. D. japonicum is the most basal representative of a clade containing D. aggregatum and the other novel diplonemid isolates YPF1508 and YPF1509, as well as D. papillatum and Diplonema sp. strain ATCC 50232. Out of these, to the best of our knowledge, only D. japonicum and D. aggregatum contain bacterial endosymbionts.
This discrepancy can be explained by two alternative scenarios of endosymbiont acquisition in the genus Diplonema. The first one postulates that the phylogeny of the endosymbionts follows that of their hosts, with symbiosis being lost in most members of the Diplonema clade. The 16S rRNA gene of the endosymbionts is under selection, and thus, evolutionary rates (at least of this gene) are rather low. The second scenario supposes a single origin of endosymbiosis in either of the diplonemid species, followed by horizontal transfer of the bacterium to the other diplonemid host. If this is correct, these diplonemid species would have to have been in close contact at least for some time in their evolutionary history. Interestingly, both D. japonicum and D. aggregatum were isolated during a single sampling event from the same spot, so such contact is possible. At the current state of knowledge, we slightly prefer the second scenario; however, a detailed genomic survey of both the hosts and endosymbionts is necessary to discriminate between these two hypotheses.
The representatives of Holosporales are very common endosymbionts of amoebas and ciliates, in which they colonize various cell compartments, including the cytoplasm and micro- and macronucleus (17, 20, 47, 48). In fact, this group of bacteria consists exclusively of obligate endosymbionts of a variety of protist hosts (49). The role of these bacteria is mostly unknown (17, 18), although the available data suggest that the interactions of Holosporales with protists are complex. They may become beneficial or disadvantageous to their hosts under specific conditions or at certain life stages. For instance, endosymbionts reduce the ciliate growth rate but, at the same time, provide a competitive advantage to their hosts over taxonomically related species by releasing killer toxins (50). Holospora-like bacteria may endow their host with a tolerance to heat shock (51), whereas other species induce host cell lysis at elevated temperatures (47). As far as we know, no mutual exchange of nutrients and metabolic complementation has been reported for the members of Holosporales.
In the case of D. japonicum and D. aggregatum, understanding of the significance their endosymbionts was impeded by the failure to eliminate them, which we explain by the possible resistance of these bacteria to a variety of antibiotics and/or failure of the drugs to penetrate the host plasma membrane. Nevertheless, we hypothesize that under the conditions studied, the endosymbionts do not negatively affect their host, as they grow well and lyse only in old batch cultures or upon long-term starvation. Moreover, the endosymbiosis appears to be stable and species specific, without differentiation of bacteria into infectious and reproductive forms, a common behavior of bacteria of the genus Holospora (17). Better understanding of this endosymbiotic relationship will require sequencing and annotation of the endosymbionts’ genomes, as well as further attempts to eliminate the bacteria via a wider spectrum of antibiotics and cell sorting. In any case, the presence of endosymbionts may help explain the recently described extreme ecologic flexibility of diplonemids, which seem to be omnipresent in the world’s oceans (2, 4, 5, 8).
The endosymbiotic bacteria are found inside mitochondria extremely rarely. In fact, only a small proportion of endosymbiont-infected mitochondria were described in ciliates (52), while the only documented case of bacteria residing predominantly within the organelle is a Rickettsia-like organism, “Ca. Midichloria mitochondrii,” an endosymbiont found in the ovaries of female Ixodes ricinus ticks (53). Remarkably, the massive multiplication of bacteria within the mitochondria and consumption of the organellar content do not disturb the normal development of eggs in the tick host. In a situation reminiscent of the ciliates, we only occasionally detected bacteria inside the mitochondrial matrix. However, we were able to map a sequence by which the bacterium establishes itself inside the organelle. Thanks to its availability in culture, this unique endosymbiont-host system is amenable to detailed dissection in future studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Axenic clonal cultures were established from samples of seawater by manual cell picking, followed by treatment with antibiotics and cultivation in horse serum-containing liquid medium. The presence of endosymbionts was verified by FISH with a 5′ Cy3-labeled EUB338 probe. DNA was stained with DAPI or SYTO24. For visualization of mitochondria, samples were treated with the membrane potential-sensitive dye tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester, DiOC6(3), MitoTracker Green FM, or MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Life Technol). An immunofluorescence assay targeting mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) was performed with antibodies generated against Trypanosoma brucei HSP70. For elimination of bacteria, the culture was treated with the antibiotic chloramphenicol, ampicillin, kanamycin, gentamicin, or azithromycin or a penicillin-streptomycin-neomycin cocktail. Infection experiments were carried out by coculturing of endosymbiont-free diplonemid species with endosymbiont-bearing D. japonicum and D. aggregatum or by incubation with their cell lysates. For a detailed description of the procedures, as well as DNA isolation, amplification, phylogenetic analyses, and light and electron microscopy, see Text S1.
Accession number(s).
The GenBank accession numbers of the sequences described here are MF422190 (D. japonicum), MF422192 (D. aggregatum), MG719947 (“Ca. Cytomitobacter primus”), and MG719948 (“Ca. Cytomitobacter indipagum”).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Rudy Cadena for the English editing of the manuscript.
Support from the ERC CZ (LL1601), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF4983.01), the Czech-BioImaging RI Project (LM2015062 funded by MEYS CR), and the Czech Ministry of Education (ERD Funds, project OPVVV 16_019/0000759) to J.L. and from JSPS (17K19343) to A.Y. is kindly acknowledged.
Footnotes
Citation Tashyreva D, Prokopchuk G, Votýpka J, Yabuki A, Horák A, Lukeš J. 2018. Life cycle, ultrastructure, and phylogeny of new diplonemids and their endosymbiotic bacteria. mBio 9:e02447-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02447-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Adl SM, Simpson AG, Lane CE, Lukeš J, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brown MW, Burki F, Dunthorn M, Hampl V, Heiss A, Hoppenrath M, Lara E, Le Gall L, Lynn DH, McManus H, Mitchell EA, Mozley-Stanridge SE, Parfrey LW, Pawlowski J, Rueckert S, Shadwick L, Shadwick L, Schoch CL, Smirnov A, Spiegel FW. 2012. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol 59:429–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flegontova O, Flegontov P, Malviya S, Audic S, Wincker P, de Vargas C, Bowler C, Lukeš J, Horák A. 2016. Extreme diversity of diplonemid eukaryotes in the ocean. Curr Biol 26:3060–3065. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Okamoto N, Gawryluk RMR, del Campo J, Strassert JFH, Lukeš J, Richards TA, Worden AZ, Santoro AE, Keeling PJ. Eupelagonema oceanica n. gen. and sp. and a revised diplonemid taxonomy. J Eukaryot Microbiol, in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lukeš J, Flegontova O, Horák A. 2015. Diplonemids. Curr Biol 25:R702–RR704. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.David V, Archibald JM. 2016. Evolution: plumbing the depths of diplonemid diversity. Curr Biol 26:R1290–R1292. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Griessmann K. 1913. Ueber marine Flagellaten. Arch Protistenkd 32:1–78. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tashyreva D, Prokopchuk G, Yabuki A, Kaur B, Faktorová D, Votýpka J, Kusaka C, Fujikura K, Shiratori T, Ishida K-I, Horák A, Lukeš J. Phylogeny and morphology of new diplonemids from Japan. Protist, in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gawryluk RMR, Del Campo J, Okamoto N, Strassert JFH, Lukeš J, Richards TA, Worden AZ, Santoro AE, Keeling PJ. 2016. Morphological identification and single-cell genomics of marine diplonemids. Curr Biol 26:3053–3059. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Montegut-Felkner AE, Triemer RE. 1996. Phylogeny of Diplonema ambulator (Larsen and Patterson). Eur J Protistol 32:64–76. doi: 10.1016/S0932-4739(96)80040-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Busse I, Preisfeld A. 2002. Phylogenetic position of Rhynchopus sp. and Diplonema ambulator as indicated by analyses of euglenozoan small subunit ribosomal DNA. Gene 284:83–91. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00390-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Porter D. 1973. Isonema papillatum sp. n., a new colorless marine flagellate: a light- and electronmicroscopic study. J Protozool 20:351–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1973.tb00895.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maslov DA, Yasuhira S, Simpson L. 1999. Phylogenetic affinities of Diplonema within the Euglenozoa as inferred from the SSU rRNA gene and partial COI protein sequences. Protist 150:33–42. doi: 10.1016/S1434-4610(99)70007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schnepf E. 1994. Light and electron microscopical observations in Rhynchopus coscinodiscivorus spec. nov., a colorless, phagotrophic Euglenozoon with concealed flagella. Arch Protistenkd 144:63–74. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9365(11)80225-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simpson AGB. 1997. The identity and composition of the Euglenozoa. Arch Protistenkd 148:318–328. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80012-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Horn M, Wagner M. 2004. Bacterial endosymbionts of free-living amoebae. J Eukaryot Microbiol 51:509–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nowack ECM, Melkonian M. 2010. Endosymbiotic associations within protists. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:699–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fokin SI. 2004. Bacterial endosymbionts of Ciliophora and their interactions with the host cell. Int Rev Cytol 236:181–249. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(04)36005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dziallas C, Allgaier M, Monaghan MT, Grossart HP. 2012. Act together-implications of symbioses in aquatic ciliates. Front Microbiol 3:288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dirren S, Salcher MM, Blom JF, Schweikert M, Posch T. 2014. Ménage-à-trois: the amoeba Nuclearia sp. from Lake Zurich with its ecto- and endosymbiotic bacteria. Protist 165:745–758. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Serra V, Fokin SI, Castelli M, Basuri CK, Nitla V, Verni F, Sandeep BV, Kalavati C, Petroni G. 2016. “Candidatus Gortzia shahrazadis,” a novel endosymbiont of Paramecium multimicronucleatum and a revision of the biogeographical distribution of Holospora-like bacteria. Front Microbiol 7:1704. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tokura M, Ohkuma M, Kudo T. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of methanogens associated with flagellated protists in the gut and with the gut epithelium of termites. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33:233–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hackstein JHP. 2010. Anaerobic ciliates and their methanogenic endosymbionts, p 13–23. In Hackstein JHP (ed), (Endo)symbiotic methanogenic archaea. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Strassert JFH, Köhler T, Mikaelyan A, Gregor I, McHardy AC, Tringe SG, Hugenholtz P, Radek R, Brune A. 2016. “Candidatus Adiutrix intracellularis,” an endosymbiont of termite gut flagellates, is the first representative of a deep-branching clade of Deltaproteobacteria and a putative homoacetogen. Environ Microbiol 18:2548–2564. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Teixeira MMG, Borghesan TC, Ferreira RC, Santos MA, Takata CSA, Campaner M, Nunes VLB, Milder RV, de Souza W, Camargo EP. 2011. Phylogenetic validation of the genera Angomonas and Strigomonas of trypanosomatids harboring bacterial endosymbionts with the description of new species of trypanosomatids and of proteobacterial symbionts. Protist 162:503–524. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kostygov AY, Dobáková E, Grybchuk-Ieremenko A, Váhala D, Maslov DA, Votýpka J, Lukeš J, Yurchenko V. 2016. Novel trypanosomatid-bacterium association: evolution of endosymbiosis in action. mBio 7:e01985. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01985-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Loyola-Machado AC, Azevedo-Martins AC, Catta-Preta CMC, de Souza W, Galina A, Motta MCM. 2017. The symbiotic bacterium fuels the energy metabolism of the host trypanosomatid Strigomonas culicis. Protist 168:253–269. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leedale GF. 1969. Observations on endonuclear bacteria in euglenoid flagellates. Öster Bot Zeitschr 116:279–294. doi: 10.1007/BF01379628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schnepf E, Schlegel I, Hepperle D. 2002. Petalomonas sphagnophila (Euglenophyta) and its endocytobiotic cyanobacteria: a unique form of symbiosis. Phycologia 41:153–157. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-41-2-153.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kuo RC, Lin S. 2013. Ectobiotic and endobiotic bacteria associated with Eutreptiella sp. isolated from Long Island Sound. Protist 164:60–74. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Breglia SA, Yubuki N, Hoppenrath M, Leander BS. 2010. Ultrastructure and molecular phylogenetic position of a novel euglenozoan with extrusive episymbiotic bacteria: Bihospites bacati n. gen. et sp. (Symbiontida). BMC Microbiol 10:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fokin SI, Görtz H-D. 2009. Diversity of Holospora bacteria in Paramecium and their characterization, p 161–199. In Fujishima M (ed), Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marande W, Lukeš J, Burger G. 2005. Unique mitochondrial genome structure in diplonemids, the sister group of kinetoplastids. Eukaryot Cell 4:1137–1146. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.6.1137-1146.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vlcek C, Marande W, Teijeiro S, Lukeš J, Burger G. 2011. Systematically fragmented genes in a multipartite mitochondrial genome. Nucleic Acids Res 39:979–988. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferla MP, Thrash JC, Giovannoni SJ, Patrick WM. 2013. New rRNA gene-based phylogenies of the Alphaproteobacteria provide perspective on major groups, mitochondrial ancestry and phylogenetic instability. PLoS One 8:e83383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hess S, Suthaus A, Melkonian M. 2015. Candidatus Finniella (Rickettsiales, Alphaproteobacteria), novel endosymbionts of viridiraptorid amoeboflagellates (Cercozoa, Rhizaria). Appl Environ Microbiol 82:659–670. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02680-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yubuki N, Edgcomb VP, Bernhard JM, Leander BS. 2009. Ultrastructure and molecular phylogeny of Calkinsia aureus: cellular identity of a novel clade of deep-sea euglenozoans with epibiotic bacteria. BMC Microbiol 9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Triemer RE, Ott DW. 1990. Ultrastructure of Diplonema ambulator Larsen and Patterson (Euglenozoa) and its relationship to Isonema. Eur J Protistol 25:316–320. doi: 10.1016/S0932-4739(11)80123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.von der Heyden S, Chao EE, Vickerman K, Cavalier-Smith T. 2004. Ribosomal RNA phylogeny of bodonid and diplonemid flagellates and the evolution of Euglenozoa. J Eukaryot Microbiol 51:402–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00387.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Elbrächter M, Schnepf E, Balzer I. 1996. Hemistasia phaeocysticola (Scherffel) comb. nov., redescription of a free-living, marine, phagotrophic kinetoplastid flagellate. Arch Protistenkd 147:125–136. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9365(96)80028-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schuster F, Goldstein S, Hershenov B. 1968. Ultrastructure of a flagellate, Isonema nigricans nov. gen. nov. sp., from a polluted marine habitat. Protistologica 4:141–154. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roy J, Faktorová D, Benada O, Lukeš J, Burger G. 2007. Description of Rhynchopus euleeides n. sp. (Diplonemea), a free-living marine Euglenozoan. J Eukaryot Microbiol 54:137–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2007.00244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gadelha C, Wickstead B, de Souza W, Gull K, Cunha-e-Silva N. 2005. Cryptic paraflagellar rod in endosymbiont-containing kinetoplastid protozoa. Eukaryot Cell 4:516–525. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.3.516-525.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Portman N, Gull K. 2010. The paraflagellar rod of kinetoplastid parasites: from structure to components and function. Int J Parasitol 40:135–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kaur B, Valach M, Peña Diaz P, Moreira S, Keeling PJ, Burger G, Lukeš J, Faktorová D. Transformation of Diplonema papillatum, the type species of the highly diverse and abundant marine micro-eukaryotes Diplonemida (Euglenozoa). Environ Microbiol, in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Moran NA. 1996. Accelerated evolution and Muller’s rachet [sic] in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2873–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Clark MA, Moran NA, Baumann P. 1999. Sequence evolution in bacterial endosymbionts having extreme base compositions. Mol Biol Evol 16:1586–1598. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Birtles RJ, Rowbotham TJ, Michel R, Pitcher DG, Lascola B, Alexiou-Daniel S, Raoult D. 2000. “Candidatus Odyssella thessalonicensis” gen. nov., sp. nov, an obligate intracellular parasite of Acanthamoeba species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:63–72. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-1-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Boscaro V, Fokin SI, Schrallhammer M, Schweikert M, Petroni G. 2013. Revised systematics of Holospora-like bacteria and characterization of “Candidatus Gortzia infectiva,” a novel macronuclear symbiont of Paramecium jenningsi. Microb Ecol 65:255–267. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Szokoli F, Castelli M, Sabaneyeva E, Schrallhammer M, Krenek S, Doak TG, Berendonk TU, Petroni G. 2016. Disentangling the taxonomy of Rickettsiales and description of two novel symbionts (“Candidatus Bealeia paramacronuclearis” and “Candidatus Fokinia cryptica”) sharing the cytoplasm of the ciliate protist Paramecium biaurelia. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:7236–7247. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02284-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kusch J, Czubatinski L, Wegmann S, Hubner M, Alter M, Albrecht P. 2002. Competitive advantages of Caedibacter-infected paramecia. Protist 153:47–58. doi: 10.1078/1434-4610-00082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hori M, Fujishima M. 2003. The endosymbiotic bacterium Holospora obtusa enhances heat-shock gene expression of the host Paramecium caudatum. J Eukaryot Microbiol 50:293–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fokin SI, Schweikert M, Görtz H-D, Fujishima M. 2003. Bacterial endocytobionts of Ciliophora. Diversity and some interactions with the host. Eur J Protistol 39:475–480. doi: 10.1078/0932-4739-00023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sassera D, Beninati T, Bandi C, Bouman EAP, Sacchi L, Fabbi M, Lo N. 2006. “Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii,” an endosymbiont of the tick Ixodes ricinus with a unique intramitochondrial lifestyle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2535–2540. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64386-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.